DOCSLIB.ORG

A Case Study of Walter C. Kaiser Jr. and Norman L. Geisler

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2012 God and Integrity: a Case Study of Walter C. Kaiser Jr. and Norman L. Geisler Augustin Tchamba Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Tchamba, Augustin, "God and Integrity: a Case Study of Walter C. Kaiser Jr. and Norman L. Geisler" (2012). Dissertations. 153. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/153 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT GOD AND INTEGRITY: A CASE STUDY OF WALTER C. KAISER JR. AND NORMAN L. GEISLER by Augustin Tchamba Adviser: Miroslav M. Kiš ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH Dissertation Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Title: GOD AND INTEGRITY: A CASE STUDY OF WALTER C. KAISER JR. AND NORMAN L. GEISLER Name of researcher: Augustin Tchamba Name and degree of faculty adviser: Miroslav M. Kiš, Ph.D. Date completed: April 2012 The God of the Bible is sometimes portrayed as using and condoning deceit to achieve His purpose, especially when human life is at stake. Two evangelical scholars, Walter C. Kaiser Jr. and Norman L. Geisler, with a shared theological heritage, differ in their interpretation of Exod 1:15-21 and Josh 2:1-7 that addresses the ethical issue of lying to save life. This dissertation not only refutes the claim that God uses and condones the use of deceit to achieve His purpose, but also clarifies biblical argument for His integrity. The study provides answers to a number of questions. First, what causes divergent interpretations in the work of Kaiser and Geisler? Second, is it ever right to lie in order to save life? Third, does the God of the Bible who claims not to lie use or condone lies in any form? A biblical, theological, and philosophical inquiry is conducted in order to establish the biblical teachings on God’s character. In the first chapter, a historical survey displays the intensity of two opposing views and shows how scholars have pondered the moral issue of lying in general and lying to save life in particular. In order to explain the underlying reasons for these two divergent views on the issue of lying as implied in Exod 1:15-21 and Josh 2:1-7, the second chapter determines the meaning of the word integrity in the Bible. After an overview of terms in both Testaments, the Hebrew word ~ymiT' and the Greek word te,leioj, as related to God, His actions and/or attributes, are analyzed contextually, exegetically, and semantically. This chapter establishes that the word ~ymiT' means “without blemish or spotless” when it is applied to sacrificial animals, and means “whole, sound, healthful, flawless” when applied to God. The chapter thus concludes that God’s integrity is flawless. The third chapter extends the analytical scope of the word ~ymiT' to certain attributes of God. A systematic analysis of the attributes of truthfulness, trustworthiness, holiness, and mercy are done both biblically and theologically. The analysis of these attributes together with the exegetical study of the word ~ymiT' confirms that the God of the Bible is a being of integrity. The fourth chapter makes available the reasons for both scholars’ divergent interpretations by providing a report of their presuppositions, hermeneutical principles, and interpretations of the two texts under consideration. This report identifies the different presuppositions and hermeneutical principles at the genesis of their understanding of the texts. The first part of chapter five presents an exegetical study of Exod 15-22 and Josh 2:1-7 and the second part critically analyzes both Kaiser’s and Geisler’s presuppositions and hermeneutical principles. The assessment focuses on internal consistency and consistency with the biblical material. As their divergent views became more and more apparent and evident, this study concludes and posits that God is the being of integrity in whom there is no lie. He, consequently, does not use deceit to achieve His purpose. Accordingly, any attempt to use dishonesty or deceit to achieve one’s purpose is biblically unwarranted. Kaiser’s and Geisler’s different interpretations of Exod 1:15-22 and Josh 2:1-7 provide just another example of how hermeneutical principles that are alien to Scripture may project a different view of God and morality. Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary GOD AND INTEGRITY: A CASE STUDY OF WALTER C. KAISER JR. AND NORMAN L. GEISLER A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Augustin Tchamba April 2012 © Copyright by Augustin Tchamba 2012 All Rights Reserved GOD AND INTEGRITY: A CASE STUDY OF WALTER C. KAISER JR. AND NORMAN L. GEISLER A dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy by Augustin Tchamba APPROVAL BY THE COMMITTEE: __________________________________ ____________________________ Faculty Adviser, Director, PhD in Religion/ThD Programs Miroslav Kiš Tom Shepherd Professor of Ethics __________________________________ ____________________________ Richard M. Davidson Dean, SDA Theological Seminary J. N. Andrews Professor of Old Testament Denis Fortin Interpretation __________________________________ JoAnn Davidson Professor of Theology __________________________________ Paul Petersen Professor of Hebrew Bible __________________________________ _________________________ Daniel Block Date approved Gunther H. Knoedler Professor of Old Testament Wheaton College TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................... viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................... ix Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1 Working Definition of the Word “Integrity” ........................................ 2 Difficult Passages in Scripture .............................................................. 3 Historical Survey of the Interpretation of Exod 1:15-22 and Josh 2:1-7 .......................................................... 4 Problem ................................................................................................. 12 Purpose of the Study ............................................................................. 13 Justification of the Study ...................................................................... 13 Scope and Delimitations ....................................................................... 15 Methodology ......................................................................................... 16 2. MEANING OF THE WORD INTEGRITY IN THE BIBLE ..................... 18 Overview of Terms ............................................................................... 18 Old Testament ................................................................................. 18 Septuagint ....................................................................................... 20 New Testament ............................................................................... 21 Terms for Integrity as Related to God, His Actions, and/or Attributes ............................................................... 21 Old Testament ................................................................................. 22 Pentateuch: Deut 32:4 ............................................................... 22 Contextual Analysis ............................................................ 22 Hebrew Text.................................................................. 22 Translation .................................................................... 22 Exegetical Considerations ................................................... 25 Semantic Analysis ............................................................... 27 Prophets: ~ymiT'' in 2 Sam 22:31 ................................................. 30 Contextual Analysis ............................................................ 30 Hebrew Text.................................................................. 30 Translation .................................................................... 30 Exegetical Considerations ................................................... 33 Semantic Analysis ............................................................... 34 iii Writings..................................................................................... 37 Contextual Analysis of Job 37:16 ....................................... 37 Hebrew Text.................................................................. 37 Translation .................................................................... 37 Exegetical Considerations ................................................... 39 Semantic Analysis ............................................................... 40 Contextual Analysis of Psalms 19:8 ................................... 41 Hebrew Text.................................................................. 41 Translation .................................................................... 41 Exegetical Considerations
Recommended publications
  • Understanding Morality Shawn Nelson

    Understanding Morality Shawn Nelson

    February 11, 2018 Understanding Morality Shawn Nelson What is Morality? • When we say, “Humans are moral beings,” what do we really mean? o It means that people are able to make choices. o To understand this, compare humans with other life forms: ▪ Spiders (always spin the same web) ▪ Dogs (can’t help being dogs!) o In contrast, people are in the “image of God.” Genesis 1:27: “So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.” • Part of being created in God’s image means free will. Free will = the ability to “do otherwise.” People can do the right thing –or– wrong thing. Examples of right things: ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ Examples of wrong things: ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ Who decides what’s Right/Wrong? Imagine you could live on a large island where people could do ANYTHING they wanted to. You could rob banks, loot stores, lie in court, cheat on tests, sleep with whomever you want... What do you think would happen? Would people be happy? Moral laws come from God. • God is an absolute moral lawgiver 1 • Moral laws exude from His unchanging nature • These laws are traced to His moral attributes (truthfulness, love/omnibenevolence, mercy) • Morality is prescribed through special revelation (Bible). • Moral laws are understood intuitively through general revelation. We know right from wrong by our own reaction when wrong is done to us, and we intuitively know we should not treat people this way (Rom. 2:14-15). Why should we care about what’s “Right”? Objection: Nobody is righteous! We’re saved by faith in Christ.
  • An Introduction to Ethics

    An Introduction to Ethics

    An Introduction to Ethics: From the Greeks to Applied Behavior Analysis Michael F. Dorsey, Ph.D., LABA, BCBA-D Professor of Education Director, The Institute for Behavioral Studies 1 Ethics: What’s all the Fuss? 2 Ethics “Relating to what is good or bad, having to do with moral duty and obligation.” (Moral is defined as relating to principles of right and wrong.) “Ethics is not about being better than someone else; it’s about being the best we can be.” 1Webster’s New World Dictionary, 3rd College Edition 2 © 2000 Josephson Institute of Ethics. 3 What is Ethics Acting with an awareness of the need for complying with rules, such as the laws of the land, the customs and expectations of the community, the principles of morality, the policies of the organization, and such general concerns as the needs of others and fairness. 4 Code of Ethics Sometimes referred to as a Value Statement, with general principles to guide behavior, outlining a set of principles that affect decision making. 5 Perhaps the BEST Example: The US Constitution We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America 6 Code of Conduct A “code of conduct” is a set of rules outlining the social norms and rules and responsibilities of, or proper practices for, an individual, party or organization.
  • How NOT to Respond to Tragedy: Learning from Job's Friends

    How NOT to Respond to Tragedy: Learning from Job's Friends

    Wheelersburg Baptist Church 4/22/07 Brad Brandt “How NOT to Respond to Tragedy: Learning from Job’s Friends” ** Main Idea: We learn both how to respond and how NOT to respond to tragedy by looking at Job’s friends in the book of Job. I. We learn how to help people in crisis (2:11-13). A. Notice what Job’s friends did (11-12). 1. They heard about Job’s trouble (11). 2. They went to be with Job. 3. Their goal was to comfort him. 4. They wept and grieved with Job (12). B. Notice what Job’s friends did not do (13). 1. They did not hide their grief (no plastic smiles!). 2. They did not rush Job. 3. They did not speak to Job seven days and nights. C. Notice some marks of a good friend. 1. A good friend makes personal sacrifices. 2. A good friend is a good listener. 3. A good friend engages in the ministry of presence. 4. A good friend exhibits humility. 5. A good friend is real. II. We learn how NOT to help people in crisis (chapters 3-37). A. Here’s what Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar did (chapters 3-31). 1. They said true things but failed to get all the facts. 2. The problem wasn’t so much what they said but what they didn’t know (11:7-8). 3. They said there had to be sin when there wasn’t (8:4; 11:6; 18:19; 22:5). 4. They preached truth at Job instead of ministering truth to him.
  • The Chapters of the Bible a Guide to the Systematic Study of the Bible

    The Chapters of the Bible a Guide to the Systematic Study of the Bible

    Scholars Crossing An Alliterated Outline for the Chapters of the Bible A Guide to the Systematic Study of the Bible 5-2018 The Chapters of Job Harold Willmington Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/outline_chapters_bible Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Willmington, Harold, "The Chapters of Job" (2018). An Alliterated Outline for the Chapters of the Bible. 33. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/outline_chapters_bible/33 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the A Guide to the Systematic Study of the Bible at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in An Alliterated Outline for the Chapters of the Bible by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Job SECTION OUTLINE ONE (JOB 1-2) Job is introduced. God allows Satan to test Job's faithfulness by taking all that he has. Job responds with great sorrow, but he worships God. Satan accuses Job again and strikes him with boils. Job's wife tells him to curse God and die, but Job remains faithful. Three of Job's friends come and mourn with him. I. JOB'S PRESTIGE (1:1-5) A. His faith (1:1): "There was a man named Job who lived in the land of Uz. He was blameless, a man of complete integrity. He feared God and stayed away from evil." B. His fortune (1:3): "He owned 7,000 sheep, and 3,000 camels, 500 teams of oxen, and 500 female donkeys, and he employed many servants.
  • A Serious Man

    A Serious Man

    THE BIBLE AND CRITICAL THEORY ARTICLES A Serious Man Timothy Stanley, University of Newcastle A Serious Man cinematically deconstructs the life of a mid-twentieth century physics professor named Larry Gopnik. A Job-like theodicy ensues in which the paradoxes of quantum mechanics are haunted by questions of good and evil as well as the spectre of an un-named God. Although a number of commentators have suggested the film is based on the biblical book of Job, the following paper argues for its place within a longer history of commentary. To this end, the film provides a radical if not farcical interrogation of theodicy in the after-math of quantum mechanics. In one of the early scenes of the Coen brothers’ film, A Serious Man, a physics professor named Larry Gopnik giddily finishes off a mathematical proof for the counterintuitive implications of quantum mechanics.1 “And that’s Schrödinger’s paradox, right? Is the cat dead or is the cat not dead” (Coen and Coen 2007)? Soon after he has filled his chalkboard, we are taken to his office to listen in on a meeting he has with a student named Clive who has failed the exam. Evidently Clive simply recounted the story of Schrödinger’s cat,2 but failed to do the math. As Larry will say, “But ... you ... you can't really understand the physics without understanding the math. The math tells how it really works. That's the real thing; the stories I give you in class are just illustrative; they're like, fables, say, to help give you a picture… I mean – even I don't understand the dead cat” (Coen and Coen 2007, 19).3 Although the math is the real thing, it provides a paradoxical account of the world in which we actually live.
  • The Book of Job the Book of Job

    The Book of Job the Book of Job

    THE BOOK OF JOB THE BOOK OF JOB BY NORMAN H. SNAITH, M.A. Tutor in Old Testament Languages and Literature, Wesley College, Headingley, Leeds THE EPWORTH PRESS (EDGAR C. BARTON) 25-35 City Road, London, E.C.r All rights rmrved First published in r945 Mark in Great Britain I THE ANALYSIS OF THE BOOK 1. The Prologue, i, ii J oB is a wealthy Edomite sheikh of long ago, the greatest and most prosperous of them all, a man of blameless piety, scrupulous, even ultra-scrupulous in every slightest duty, perfect, upright and devout. ·Jehovah Himself testifies to his unswerving integrity, unique among the sons of men, but the Satan chal­ lenges this statement in the midst of the heavenly court. Job is but a time-server. Strip him of his wealth, kill his children, and he will renounce God with the rest. And so the Satan is permitted to deprive Job of everything, possessions, servants, chil­ dren, but not to touch Job himself. Bedawi raids begin, and lightnings and storm-winds complete the destitution, but Job in his poverty is as devout as Job with his wealth. The heavenly court gathers again, with God still sure of Job's integrity and the Satan still unbelieving. Now the Satan is permitted to smite Job with a loath­ some 'leprosy' (probably ecthyma), in which the sufferer is covered from head to foot with raw and itching ulcers. Job's wife breaks under the strain, but Job remains steadfastly devout. The last three verses of ii tell of the visit of Job's three friends, who hear of his misfortunes and come to comfort him.
  • Exploring the Spiritually Formative Experiences of Female Seminary Spouses: a Phenomenological Inquiry Benjamin Forrest Liberty University School of Education

    Exploring the Spiritually Formative Experiences of Female Seminary Spouses: a Phenomenological Inquiry Benjamin Forrest Liberty University School of Education

    EXPLORING THE SPIRITUALLY FORMATIVE EXPERIENCES OF FEMALE SEMINARY SPOUSES: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL INQUIRY by Benjamin Kelly Forrest Liberty University A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Education Liberty University June, 2013 EXPLORING THE SPIRITUALLY FORMATIVE EXPERIENCES OF FEMALE SEMINARY SPOUSES: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL INQUIRY By Benjamin Kelly Forrest A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Education Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA June, 2013 APPROVED BY: FRED A. MILACCI, D.Ed., Committee Chair JAMES L. ZABLOSKI, Ed.D., Committee Member JERRY W. POUNDS, Ed.D., Committee Member SCOTT B. WATSON, Ph.D., Associate Dean, Advanced Programs ii EXPLORING THE SPIRITUALLY FORMATIVE EXPERIENCES OF FEMALE SEMINARY SPOUSES: A PHENOMENOLOGY INQUIRY ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to present the findings of a qualitative research study exploring the spiritually formative experiences of nonstudent, female, seminary spouses whose student spouses are beyond the halfway point in their pursuit of an M.Div. at a large evangelical seminary in the eastern United States. Fifteen participants (twelve online nonstudent spouses and three residential nonstudent spouses) were purposefully sampled. The data, which was collected through questionnaires, in-depth interviews, and discussion forums, was analyzed using transcendental phenomenological analysis. Through this analysis it became apparent that seminary spouses did in fact experience spiritual formation through their husband’s education. Spouses experienced enhancements in their spiritual formation as well as detractors in their formation. Formation enhancements included relational, intellectual, and practical enhancements whereas detractors were not thematically segmented. Descriptors: Graduate education, seminary, spiritual formation, nonstudent spouse, female spouse, formative experiences, transcendental phenomenology, enhancements, detractors, spillover, crossover, Work/Family Enrichment, Work/Family Border Theory.
  • Rahab's Best Kept Secret

    Rahab's Best Kept Secret

    RAHAB’S BEST KEPT SECRET: AN INQUIRY INTO THE MORAL JUSTIFICATION OF TELLING A LIE Matthew Parks Old Testament Survey I October 8, 2013 1 RAHAB’S BEST KEPT SECRET: AN INQUIRY INTO THE MORAL JUSTIFICATION OF TELLING A LIE “Where are the Jews?” “There aren’t any Jews here.” The man struck me hard across the face. “Where do you hide the ration cards?” “I don’t know what you’re—” Kapteyn hit me again. I staggered up against the astronomical clock. Before I could recover he slapped me again, then again, and again, stinging blows that jerked my head backward… I tasted blood in my mouth. My head spun, my ears rang—I was losing consciousness. “Lord Jesus,” I cried out, “protect me!”1 When the door busted open and an armed Gestapo soldier filed into the room, Dutch watchmaker, Corrie ten Boom, had prepared for this moment. Corrie, along with her family, were instrumental in illegally hiding Jews in their home during the Nazi occupation of Holland during World War II. She did not use brute force nor intellectual advantage. Her weapon of choice? A lie. When asked frankly where she was harboring Jews, she boldly told the Gestapo officer, “There aren’t any Jews here.”2 She knew full well that she was telling a lie in order to save lives. Was this an act of altruistic heroism or moral deficiency? Was she taking a morally responsible action on behalf of her fellow human beings or failing to trust a sovereign God who has the power to make blind eyes see and seeing eyes blind?3 Corrie ten Boom is not alone in this issue.
  • Any Absolutes? Absolutely!

    Any Absolutes? Absolutely!

    STATEMENT DE198 ANY ABSOLUTES? ABSOLUTELY! by Norman L. Geisler Can a system of ethics be sustained apart from a belief in moral absolutes? And, can a belief in moral absolutes be sustained apart from a biblical world view? Norman L. Geisler provides compelling answers to these questions in this highly readable survey of basic issues and options in Christian ethics. Summary Though non-Christians have offered various relativistic definitions of moral "right," all fall short of an adequate basis for making ethical decisions. Christians define "right" in terms of what God wills. What God wills is rooted in His moral nature. And since His moral nature does not change, it follows that moral obligations flowing from His nature are absolute (they are bindi ng everywhere on everyone). When two or more absolutes come into conflict, the Christian is responsible for obeying the greater commandment. The Christian is not held guilty for not following the lesser of two (or more) conflicting commandments. Once while in Australia for a speaking engagement, I was engaged in dinner conversation with a medical student. "What is the subject of your lecture series?" he asked. "Ethics," I replied. "What is that?" he inquired. I took a moment to recover from my shock. Here was a bright young man about to enter a profession involving some of the major ethical decisions of our time who did not even know what ethics was! I said softly and gently, so as not to offend him for his ignorance, "Ethics deals with what is right and what is wrong." I confess I felt a bit like the famed football coach Vince Lombardi, who once, after his Green Bay Packers played a particularly inept game, allegedly told the battered team, "This is a football!" Perhaps we cannot get too basic.
  • Moral Relativism Overview on Moral Relativism

    Moral Relativism Overview on Moral Relativism

    Moral Relativism Overview on Moral Relativism https://youtu.be/5RU7M6JSVtk Moral relativism is the idea that there is no universal or absolute set of moral principles. It’s a version of morality that advocates “to each her own,” and those who follow it say, “Who am I to judge?” It is the position that moral or ethical propositions do not reflect objective and/or universal moral truths, but instead make claims relative to social, cultural, historical or personal circumstances. It does not deny outright the truth-value or justification of moral statements (as some forms of Moral Anti-Realism do), but affirms relative forms of them. It may be described by the common aphorism: “When in Rome, do as the Romans do”. Moral Relativists point out that humans are not omniscient and history is replete with examples of individuals and societies acting in the name of an infallible truth later demonstrated to be more than fallible, so we should be very wary of basing important ethical decisions on a supposed absolute claim. Absolutes also tend to inhibit experimentation and foreclose possible fields of inquiry that might lead to progress in many fields, as well as stifling the human spirit and quest for meaning. In addition, the short term proves itself vastly superior in the ethical decision-making process than the relatively unknown long-term. Relativistic positions may specifically see moral values as applicable only within certain cultural boundaries (Cultural Relativism) or in the context of individual preferences (Ethical Subjectivism). A related but slightly different concept is that of Moral Pluralism (or Value Pluralism), the idea that there are several values which may be equally correct and fundamental, and yet in conflict with each other (e.g.
  • 2020-2021-Graduate-And-Seminary

    2020-2021-Graduate-And-Seminary

    2020-2021 Graduate and Seminary Catalog Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................... 3 Christian Education .................................................................... 27 Our Mission ................................................................................... 3 Church History/Historical Theology ......................................... 30 Our Philosophy of Education ....................................................... 3 Clinical Mental Health Counseling (Pastoral Care and Our History ................................................................................... 4 Counseling) ................................................................................. 30 Where to Find Us .......................................................................... 4 Doctor of Ministry ...................................................................... 34 Student Body ................................................................................. 4 Intercultural Studies (Missions) ................................................. 36 Student Life ................................................................................... 4 Leadership Studies ...................................................................... 38 Jessie C. Eury Library .................................................................... 4 New Testament ........................................................................... 40 University Lectureships ...............................................................
  • The Genesis Creation Account.Pdf

    The Genesis Creation Account.Pdf

    “Creation in the Bible” Series Ekkehardt Mueller, General Editor Deputy Director, Biblical Research Institute The Genesis Creation Account and Its Reverberations in the Old Testament Gerald A. Klingbeil, Volume Editor Research Professor of Old Testament and Ancient Near Eastern Studies, Andrews University The Genesis Creation Account and Its Reverberations in the New Testament Thomas R. Shepherd, Volume Editor Professor of New Testament, Andrews University The following entities collaborated in the preparation of this volume: Biblical Research Institute A doctrinal and theological resource center that serves the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists through research, publication, and presentations. adventistbiblicalresearch.org Geoscience Research Institute area of origins and other related matters. Findings are made available throughAssists the publications Church through and presentations. the scientific grisda.orgstudy of the natural world in the Faith and Science Council A body of the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists created to study the interrelationships of science and Scripture with particular attention to creation. It provides for the two Institutes above to interact and collaborate on projects. fscsda.org Andrews University Press Sutherland House 8360 W. Campus Circle Dr. Berrien Springs, MI 49104–1700 Telephone: 269–471– 6134 Fax: 269–471– 6224 Email: [email protected] Website: http://universitypress.andrews.edu Copyright © 2015 by Andrews University Press and the General Conference of Seventh- day Adventists All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner or translated into other languages without written permission from the publisher except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. ISBN 978–1– 940980–09– 6 (paperback) ISBN 978–1– 940980–10– 2 (e- book) Printed in the United States of America 19 18 17 16 15 1 2 3 4 5 Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data The Genesis creation account and its reverberations in the Old Testament / ed.