Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2012 God and Integrity: a Case Study of Walter C. Kaiser Jr. and Norman L. Geisler Augustin Tchamba Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Tchamba, Augustin, "God and Integrity: a Case Study of Walter C. Kaiser Jr. and Norman L. Geisler" (2012). Dissertations. 153. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/153 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT GOD AND INTEGRITY: A CASE STUDY OF WALTER C. KAISER JR. AND NORMAN L. GEISLER by Augustin Tchamba Adviser: Miroslav M. Kiš ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH Dissertation Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Title: GOD AND INTEGRITY: A CASE STUDY OF WALTER C. KAISER JR. AND NORMAN L. GEISLER Name of researcher: Augustin Tchamba Name and degree of faculty adviser: Miroslav M. Kiš, Ph.D. Date completed: April 2012 The God of the Bible is sometimes portrayed as using and condoning deceit to achieve His purpose, especially when human life is at stake. Two evangelical scholars, Walter C. Kaiser Jr. and Norman L. Geisler, with a shared theological heritage, differ in their interpretation of Exod 1:15-21 and Josh 2:1-7 that addresses the ethical issue of lying to save life. This dissertation not only refutes the claim that God uses and condones the use of deceit to achieve His purpose, but also clarifies biblical argument for His integrity. The study provides answers to a number of questions. First, what causes divergent interpretations in the work of Kaiser and Geisler? Second, is it ever right to lie in order to save life? Third, does the God of the Bible who claims not to lie use or condone lies in any form? A biblical, theological, and philosophical inquiry is conducted in order to establish the biblical teachings on God’s character. In the first chapter, a historical survey displays the intensity of two opposing views and shows how scholars have pondered the moral issue of lying in general and lying to save life in particular. In order to explain the underlying reasons for these two divergent views on the issue of lying as implied in Exod 1:15-21 and Josh 2:1-7, the second chapter determines the meaning of the word integrity in the Bible. After an overview of terms in both Testaments, the Hebrew word ~ymiT' and the Greek word te,leioj, as related to God, His actions and/or attributes, are analyzed contextually, exegetically, and semantically. This chapter establishes that the word ~ymiT' means “without blemish or spotless” when it is applied to sacrificial animals, and means “whole, sound, healthful, flawless” when applied to God. The chapter thus concludes that God’s integrity is flawless. The third chapter extends the analytical scope of the word ~ymiT' to certain attributes of God. A systematic analysis of the attributes of truthfulness, trustworthiness, holiness, and mercy are done both biblically and theologically. The analysis of these attributes together with the exegetical study of the word ~ymiT' confirms that the God of the Bible is a being of integrity. The fourth chapter makes available the reasons for both scholars’ divergent interpretations by providing a report of their presuppositions, hermeneutical principles, and interpretations of the two texts under consideration. This report identifies the different presuppositions and hermeneutical principles at the genesis of their understanding of the texts. The first part of chapter five presents an exegetical study of Exod 15-22 and Josh 2:1-7 and the second part critically analyzes both Kaiser’s and Geisler’s presuppositions and hermeneutical principles. The assessment focuses on internal consistency and consistency with the biblical material. As their divergent views became more and more apparent and evident, this study concludes and posits that God is the being of integrity in whom there is no lie. He, consequently, does not use deceit to achieve His purpose. Accordingly, any attempt to use dishonesty or deceit to achieve one’s purpose is biblically unwarranted. Kaiser’s and Geisler’s different interpretations of Exod 1:15-22 and Josh 2:1-7 provide just another example of how hermeneutical principles that are alien to Scripture may project a different view of God and morality. Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary GOD AND INTEGRITY: A CASE STUDY OF WALTER C. KAISER JR. AND NORMAN L. GEISLER A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Augustin Tchamba April 2012 © Copyright by Augustin Tchamba 2012 All Rights Reserved GOD AND INTEGRITY: A CASE STUDY OF WALTER C. KAISER JR. AND NORMAN L. GEISLER A dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy by Augustin Tchamba APPROVAL BY THE COMMITTEE: __________________________________ ____________________________ Faculty Adviser, Director, PhD in Religion/ThD Programs Miroslav Kiš Tom Shepherd Professor of Ethics __________________________________ ____________________________ Richard M. Davidson Dean, SDA Theological Seminary J. N. Andrews Professor of Old Testament Denis Fortin Interpretation __________________________________ JoAnn Davidson Professor of Theology __________________________________ Paul Petersen Professor of Hebrew Bible __________________________________ _________________________ Daniel Block Date approved Gunther H. Knoedler Professor of Old Testament Wheaton College TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................... viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................... ix Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1 Working Definition of the Word “Integrity” ........................................ 2 Difficult Passages in Scripture .............................................................. 3 Historical Survey of the Interpretation of Exod 1:15-22 and Josh 2:1-7 .......................................................... 4 Problem ................................................................................................. 12 Purpose of the Study ............................................................................. 13 Justification of the Study ...................................................................... 13 Scope and Delimitations ....................................................................... 15 Methodology ......................................................................................... 16 2. MEANING OF THE WORD INTEGRITY IN THE BIBLE ..................... 18 Overview of Terms ............................................................................... 18 Old Testament ................................................................................. 18 Septuagint ....................................................................................... 20 New Testament ............................................................................... 21 Terms for Integrity as Related to God, His Actions, and/or Attributes ............................................................... 21 Old Testament ................................................................................. 22 Pentateuch: Deut 32:4 ............................................................... 22 Contextual Analysis ............................................................ 22 Hebrew Text.................................................................. 22 Translation .................................................................... 22 Exegetical Considerations ................................................... 25 Semantic Analysis ............................................................... 27 Prophets: ~ymiT'' in 2 Sam 22:31 ................................................. 30 Contextual Analysis ............................................................ 30 Hebrew Text.................................................................. 30 Translation .................................................................... 30 Exegetical Considerations ................................................... 33 Semantic Analysis ............................................................... 34 iii Writings..................................................................................... 37 Contextual Analysis of Job 37:16 ....................................... 37 Hebrew Text.................................................................. 37 Translation .................................................................... 37 Exegetical Considerations ................................................... 39 Semantic Analysis ............................................................... 40 Contextual Analysis of Psalms 19:8 ................................... 41 Hebrew Text.................................................................. 41 Translation .................................................................... 41 Exegetical Considerations