Vitis Vinifera
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Viticulture Research and Outreach Addressing the Ohio Grape and Wine Industry Production Challenges
HCS Series Number 853 ANNUAL OGIC REPORT (1 July ’16 – 30 June ‘17) Viticulture Research and Outreach Addressing the Ohio Grape and Wine Industry Production Challenges Imed Dami, Professor & Viticulture State Specialist Diane Kinney, Research Assistant II VITICULTURE PROGRAM Department of Horticulture and Crop Science 1 Table of Contents Page Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………………..………….3 2016 Weather………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……..5 Viticulture Research……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…… 10 Project #1: Trunk Renewal Methods for Vine Recovery After Winter Injury……………………………………… 11 Project #2: Evaluation of Performance and Cultural Practices of Promising Wine Grape Varieties….. 16 Viticulture Production…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….28 Commercial Expansion of Varieties New to Ohio………………………………………………………………………………….28 Viticulture Extension & Outreach……………………………………………………………………………………………41 OGEN and Fruit Maturity Updates………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 41 Ohio Grape & Wine Conference………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 42 Industry Field Day and Workshops………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 43 “Buckeye Appellation” Website………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 45 Industry Meetings………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 45 Professional Meetings…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 45 Student Training & Accomplishments…………………………………………………………………………………… 49 Honors & Awards………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 50 Appendix………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. -
Observations of German Viticulture
Observations of German Viticulture GregGreg JohnsJohns TheThe OhioOhio StateState UniversityUniversity // OARDCOARDC AshtabulaAshtabula AgriculturalAgricultural ResearchResearch StationStation KingsvilleKingsville The Group Under the direction of the Ohio Grape Industries Committee Organized by Deutsches Weininstitute Attended by 20+ representatives ODA Director & Mrs. Dailey OGIC Mike Widner OSU reps. Todd Steiner & Greg Johns Ohio (and Pa) Winegrowers / Winemakers Wine Distributor Kerry Brady, our guide Others Itinerary March 26 March 29 Mosel Mittelrhein & Nahe Join group - Koblenz March 30 March 27 Rheingau Educational sessions March 31 Lower Mosel Rheinhessen March 28 April 1 ProWein - Dusseldorf Depart Observations of the German Winegrowing Industry German wine educational sessions German Wine Academy ProWein - Industry event Showcase of wines from around the world Emphasis on German wines Tour winegrowing regions Vineyards Wineries Geisenheim Research Center German Wine Academy Deutsches Weininstitute EducationEducation -- GermanGerman StyleStyle WinegrowingWinegrowing RegionsRegions RegionalRegional IdentityIdentity LabelingLabeling Types/stylesTypes/styles WineWine LawsLaws TastingsTastings ProWein German Winegrowing Regions German Wine Regions % white vs. red Rheinhessen 68%White 32%Red Pfalz 60% 40% Baden 57% 43% Wurttemberg 30% 70%*** Mosel-Saar-Ruwer 91% 9% Franken 83% 17% Nahe 75% 25% Rheingau 84% 16% Saale-Unstrut 75% 25% Ahr 12% 88%*** Mittelrhein 86% 14% -
2019 Grape Maturity at OSU Research Vineyards Imed Dami, Diane Kinney, Andy Kirk, Yvonne Woodworth, the Ohio State University
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER 2019 Grape Maturity at OSU Research Vineyards Imed Dami, Diane Kinney, Andy Kirk, Yvonne Woodworth, The Ohio State University. Thanks to the continuous interest by Ohio growers and vintners and support by the Ohio Grape Industries Committee, we are pleased to resume monitoring fruit maturity progression of varieties grown at the research vineyards during the 2019 season. This information will be sent weekly to OGEN subscribers and posted on the program website, Buckeye Appellation. The date of berry sampling and corresponding heat units or growing degree days (GDD) are included. Note that the GDD in your location could be higher or lower than that at our sites. For example, at the Wooster research vineyard, grape ripening of similar varieties is typically 1 to 2 weeks behind central and southern Ohio, and 1 to 2 weeks ahead of more northern latitude vineyards and on Lake Erie shores. To determine the GDD in your location, visit the OSU-GDD Calculator. To learn more about monitoring fruit maturity and berry sampling, please read OSU factsheet at the following link: Are your grapes ready to pick? Click here for Fruit maturity from previous years. We wish you bountiful and successful harvest!! rape maturity of grape varieties at the Wooster research vineyard: G (1) Sampling Date: 8/20/2019 (GDD=2138) 100 Harvest Variety Berry SS (%) pH T.A. (g/L) FMI Date wt (g) Chardonnay 136 15.2 2.93 16.9 9 Chambourcin 187 14.3 2.79 18.3 8 La Crescent 138 17.9 2.89 16.0 11 Marquette 144 18.3 2.90 16.1 11 Regent 169 17.0 3.20 13.3 13 Sauvignon blanc 139 17.5 2.94 16.8 10 *SS: soluble solids, which estimate sugar concentration in grape juice using a refractometer. -
Determining the Mesoscale Impact of Climatic Change for Quebec's Winegrowing Bioclimatology
Open Geospatial Viticulture: Determining the Mesoscale Impact of Climatic Change for Quebec©s Winegrowing Bioclimatology Trevor James Smith A thesis In the Department of Geography, Planning, and Environment Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Magisteriate in Science (Geography, Urban, and Environmental Studies) Concordia University Montréal, Québec Canada 24 February 2017 © 2017, Trevor James Smith, Some Rights Reserved Creative Commons 4.0 International BY-NC License (see Annex 6) CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY School of Graduate Studies This is to certify that the thesis prepared by Trevor James Smith Entitled Open Geospatial Viticulture: Determining the Mesoscale Impact of Climatic Change for Quebec©s Winegrowing Bioclimatology and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Magisteriate in Science (Geography, Urban, and Environmental Studies) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final Examining Committee: ____________________________________________________ Chair Dr. Norma Rantisi _________________________________________________Examiner Dr. Norman K. Jones _________________________________________________Examiner Dr. Philippe Roy ________________________________________________Supervisor Dr. H. Damon Matthews Approved by ___________________________________________ Chair of Department ___________________________________________ Dean of Faculty of Arts and Science On ___________________________________________ -
2020 Canada Province-Level Wine Landscapes
WINE INTELLIGENCE CANADA PROVINCE-LEVEL WINE LANDSCAPES 2020 FEBRUARY 2020 1 Copyright © Wine Intelligence 2020 • All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means) without the permission of the copyright owners. Application for permission should be addressed to Wine Intelligence. • The source of all information in this publication is Wine Intelligence unless otherwise stated. • Wine Intelligence shall not be liable for any damages (including without limitation, damages for loss of business or loss of profits) arising in contract, tort or otherwise from this publication or any information contained in it, or from any action or decision taken as a result of reading this publication. • Please refer to the Wine Intelligence Terms and Conditions for Syndicated Research Reports for details about the licensing of this report, and the use to which it can be put by licencees. • Wine Intelligence Ltd: 109 Maltings Place, 169 Tower Bridge Road, London SE1 3LJ Tel: 020 73781277. E-mail: [email protected]. Registered in England as a limited company number: 4375306 2 CONTENTS ▪ How to read this report p. 5 ▪ Management summary p. 7 ▪ Wine market provinces: key differences p. 21 ▪ Ontario p. 32 ▪ Alberta p. 42 ▪ British Colombia p. 52 ▪ Québec p. 62 ▪ Manitoba p. 72 ▪ Nova Scotia p. 82 ▪ Appendix p. 92 ▪ Methodology p. 100 3 CONTENTS ▪ How to read this report p. 5 ▪ Management summary p. 7 ▪ Wine market provinces: key differences p. 21 ▪ Ontario p. 32 ▪ Alberta p. 42 ▪ British Colombia p. 52 ▪ Québec p. -
2014 Midwest Small Fruit and Grape Spray Guide Contents Foreword
2 014 Midwest Small Fruit and Grape Arkansas Spray Guide University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service AG1281 Illinois University of Illinois Extension ICSG3-14 Indiana Purdue Extension ID-169 Iowa Iowa State University Extension and Outreach PM 1375 Kansas K-State Research and Extension Kentucky University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service ID-94 Missouri University of Missouri Missouri State University MX377 Nebraska University of Nebraska — Lincoln Extension Ohio Ohio State University Extension 506B2 Oklahoma Oklahoma State University Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service E-987 West Virginia West Virginia University Extension Service Publication 865 Wisconsin University of Wisconsin-Extension A3899 2014 Midwest Small Fruit and Grape Spray Guide Contents Foreword .......................................................................................................................................6 Tips on Using This Spray Guide .................................................................................................13 Grape Spray Schedule .................................................................................................................15 Blueberry Spray Schedule ...........................................................................................................37 Raspberry and Blackberry Spray Schedule .................................................................................42 Strawberry Spray Schedule .........................................................................................................49 -
Guide H-309: Grape Varieties for North-Central New Mexico
COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURAL, CONSUMER AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Grape Varieties for North-central New Mexico Revised by William “Gill” Giese and Kevin Lombard1 aces.nmsu.edu/pubs • Cooperative Extension Service • Guide H-309 The College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences is an engine for economic and community development in New © Alika1712 | Dreamstime.com INTRODUCTION Mexico, improving Grapes (Vitis spp.) are the most widely grown perennial fruit crop in the world. They are grown in home gardens for fruit and landscape the lives of New purposes or commercially for wine, raisins, or fresh consumption as “table” grapes. A cultivated variety, or “cultivar,” is a formal term for Mexicans through variety. Variety is the more common term, and will be used in this publication. Selecting grape varieties that are adapted to prevailing academic, research, climatic and soil conditions is an important step before planting. Very few locations above 6,000 feet in elevation are successful grape pro- and Extension duction sites. Suitable growing conditions at lower elevations are still very site-specific due to the major threat to grape culture: winter or programs. frost injury. Winter injury occurs at subfreezing temperatures during vine dormancy when no green tissue is present. Frost injury occurs at subfreezing temperatures when green tissue is present. A variety’s win- ter hardiness, or ability to withstand cold temperatures, depends on its genetic makeup or “type.” In addition to winter hardiness, other considerations when selecting a variety are its fruit characteristics, number of frost-free days required for ripening, disease susceptibility, yield potential, growth habit, and other cultural requirements. -
Determining Grape Maturity and Fruit Sampling
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION 2018 Grape Maturity at OSU Research Vineyards Imed Dami, Diane Kinney, Andy Kirk, Yvonne Woodworth, The Ohio State University. Thanks to the continuous interest by Ohio growers and vintners and support by the Ohio Grape Industries Committee, we are pleased to resume monitoring fruit maturity progression of varieties grown at the research vineyards during the 2018 season. This information will be sent weekly to OGEN subscribers and posted on the program website, Buckeye Appellation. The date of berry sampling and corresponding heat units or growing degree days (GDD) are included. Note that the GDD in your location could be higher or lower than that at our sites. For example, at the Wooster research vineyard, grape ripening of similar varieties is typically 1 to 2 weeks behind central and southern Ohio, and 1 to 2 weeks ahead of more northern latitude vineyards and on Lake Erie shores. To determine the GDD in your location, visit the OSU-GDD Calculator. To learn more about monitoring fruit maturity and berry sampling, please read OSU factsheet at the following link: Are your grapes ready to pick? Click here for Fruit maturity from previous years. We wish you bountiful and successful harvest!! Grape maturity of grape varieties at the Wooster research vineyard: (1) Sampling Date: 8/20/2018 (GDD=2242) 50 Berry Variety SS (%) pH T.A. (g/L) FMI wt (g) Cabernet franc 70 15.7 2.95 17.9 9 La Crescent 71 19.5 2.99 18.4 11 Marquette 69 20.9 3.07 14.7 14 Regent 99 19.1 3.22 7.7 25 Sauvignon blanc 80 19.6 3.03 11.1 18 *SS: soluble solids, which estimate sugar concentration in grape juice using a refractometer. -
Wine Grape Variety Trial for Maritime Western Washington 2000-2008
Summary of Results: Wine Grape Variety Trial for Maritime Western Washington 2000-2008 Wine Grape Cultivar Trials 2000-2008 in the Cool Maritime Climate of Western WA Gary Moulton, Carol Miles, Jacqueline King, and Charla Echlin WSU Mount Vernon NWREC 16650 State Route 536, Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Tel. 360-848-6150 Email [email protected] http://extension.wsu.edu/maritimefruit/Pages/default.aspx Wines produced from grapes grown in cool climate regions have generally low alcohol content, low viscosity, and high fruit aromas and flavor (Casteel, 1992; Jackson and Schuster, 1977; Zoecklein, 1998). Certain varietals from Germany, Austria Russia, Hungary, and Armenia, as well as some common French varieties such as Pinot Noir and Pinot Gris can produce excellent fruity wines in western Washington. Selection of the right clone is important and knowing the heat units of your site will greatly aid in the selection of which varieties to grow. The cool maritime region of western Washington is on the very low end of the spectrum with respect to the number of growing degree days (GDD) needed for ripening the more common wine grape cultivars. Although the Puget Sound region has a long growing season in terms of frost free days, mesoclimates within the area range from below 1200 GDD to 2200 GDD. The Washington State University Mount Vernon Northwestern Washington Research and Extension Center (WSU Mount Vernon NWREC) research site is located at 12 feet above sea level in the Skagit Valley floodplain, 3 miles from the Puget Sound. Since 2002, annual GDD averaged 1693; in 2003 there was a spike in GDD of 1965. -
377 Final 2003/0140
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 24.6.2003 COM (2003) 377 final 2003/0140 (ACC) Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion of an agreement between the European Community and Canada on trade in wines and spirit drinks (presented by the Commission) EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. This agreement between Canada and the European Community is the result of bilateral negotiations which took place from 7 November 2001 to 24 April 2003 on the basis of a negotiating mandate adopted by the Council on 1 August 2001 (Doc. 11170/01). The agreement comprises arrangements for the reciprocal trade in wines and spirit drinks with a view to creating favourable conditions for its harmonious development. 2. The agreement specifies oenological practices which may be used by producers of wine exported to the other Party, as well as a procedure for accepting new oenological practices. The Community's simplified system of certification will be applied to imported wines originating in Canada. Canada will not introduce import certification for Community wines and will simplify the extent of such testing requirements as are currently applied by provinces, within a year of entry into force. Production standards are agreed for wine made from grapes frozen on the vine. Concerning production standards for spirit drinks, the agreement provides that Canada will adhere to Community standards for its exports of whisky to the Community. 3. Procedures whereby geographical indications relating to wines and spirit drinks of either Party may be protected in the territory of the other Party are agreed. The current "generic" status in Canada of 21 wine names will be ended by the following dates: 31 December 2013 for Chablis, Champagne, Port and Porto, and Sherry; 31 December 2008 for Bourgogne and Burgundy, Rhin and Rhine, and Sauterne and Sauternes; the date of entry into force of the agreement for Bordeaux, Chianti, Claret, Madeira, Malaga, Marsala, Medoc and Médoc, and Mosel and Moselle. -
LES CEPAGES RESISTANTS Présentation, Réglementation Introduction
LES CEPAGES RESISTANTS Présentation, réglementation Introduction • 1845 arrivée de l’oïdium en Europe • 1868 introduction du phylloxéra • 1878 introduction du mildiou Vitis vinifera sensible Lutte fongicide obligatoire sur Amélioration variétale Vitis vinifera Historique Contraintes environnementales, Comment crée t’on une variété? réglementaires sociétales Qu’est - ce que la résistance? Quels progrès récents? Quel intérêt économique? Formation Cépages résistants | Libourne, 20/05/2015 2 Au départ, de nombreuses espèces dans le monde Muscadinia Vitis américains Vitis vinifera Vitis asiatiques 3 Historique de la création variétale 1878 Mildiou Soufre + cuivre Fongicides de synthèse 1863 Phylloxera Décret du 18 janvier 1935 : 1845 Oïdium Proscription de 6 cépages hybrides 1ère Génération 2ème Génération 3ème Génération Croisements franco- Croisements G1 x Vitis Croisements G2 américains Ex : Baco Noir asiatiques et vinifera M. rotundifolia Croisements américains Ex : Clinton (V. riparia x V. labrusca) 1800 1900 1970 2000 année Obtentions INRA Bouquet Vitis vinifera x FormationMuscadinia Cépages résistants rotundifolia | Libourne, 20/05/2015 4 Les cépages résistants de deuxième génération Rétrocroisements Croisements V. HPD avec V. vinifera x Vitis 1935 vinifera asiatiques Zarya Castor, Pollux, severa 1950 Hibernal Chardonnel 20-30% 1960 Merzling Regent Bianca Zalagyöngie 1970 Croisements V. vinifera x M. Bronner, Solaris 1980 rotundifolia Souvignier gris, Muscaris 50% 1990 Variétés Cabernet Cortis, Prior…. monogéniques Cabernet b, Pinotin… -
2004 Grape Variety Trial at Rogers Mesa
2004 Grape Variety Trial at Rogers Mesa Horst Caspari Grape variety trial (2004) at Rogers Mesa In 2004, we started a variety and clonal trial at the Western Colorado Research Center – Roger Mesa. Evaluation of several V. vinifera and hybrid varieties rarely used in Delta County. Evaluation of Pinot noir clones. Evaluation of irrigation / soil management systems. Grape variety trial (2004) at Rogers Mesa White varieties: Riesling, Rkatsiteli, Traminette, Valvin Muscat Red varieties: Chambourcin, Corot noir, Geneva Red, Noiret Dornfelder, Malbec, Pinot noir, Pinot Meunier, Regent Grape variety trial (2004) at Rogers Mesa Pinot noir clones: 02A, 09, 23, 29, 115, 236, 777, Geneva, Pernand Materials and Methods Planted in 2004, with additions in 2006 All vines are own-rooted Vine x row spacing is 4’-6’ x 7’-8’ Cordon and spur Vertical Shoot Positioning Soil / irrigation management Comparison of two soil/irrigation treatments, each replicated twice: Drip irrigation with bare soil in the inter-row area Micro-sprinkler irrigation with a perennial grass cover crop in the inter-row area Bud cold hardiness Controlled freezing test were used to monitor bud cold hardiness of Chambourcin and Rkatsiteli over 7 and 8 years, respectively. Bud survival was evaluated for all varieties prior to dormant pruning. Pruning adjustments were made if/when primary bud mortality exceeded 5 %. Results First crop in 2006 On 30 Nov, 2006 the minimum temperature was -9.9 F. There was close to 100 % bud mortality on Dornfelder, Pinot noir, Regent, and Valvin Muscat. Riesling and Rkatsiteli had about 50 % bud mortality. Chambourcin had about 10 % bud mortality.