Pilzwiderstandsfähige Rebsorten
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Viticulture Research and Outreach Addressing the Ohio Grape and Wine Industry Production Challenges
HCS Series Number 853 ANNUAL OGIC REPORT (1 July ’16 – 30 June ‘17) Viticulture Research and Outreach Addressing the Ohio Grape and Wine Industry Production Challenges Imed Dami, Professor & Viticulture State Specialist Diane Kinney, Research Assistant II VITICULTURE PROGRAM Department of Horticulture and Crop Science 1 Table of Contents Page Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………………..………….3 2016 Weather………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……..5 Viticulture Research……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…… 10 Project #1: Trunk Renewal Methods for Vine Recovery After Winter Injury……………………………………… 11 Project #2: Evaluation of Performance and Cultural Practices of Promising Wine Grape Varieties….. 16 Viticulture Production…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….28 Commercial Expansion of Varieties New to Ohio………………………………………………………………………………….28 Viticulture Extension & Outreach……………………………………………………………………………………………41 OGEN and Fruit Maturity Updates………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 41 Ohio Grape & Wine Conference………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 42 Industry Field Day and Workshops………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 43 “Buckeye Appellation” Website………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 45 Industry Meetings………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 45 Professional Meetings…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 45 Student Training & Accomplishments…………………………………………………………………………………… 49 Honors & Awards………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 50 Appendix………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. -
Grapevine Survey for Viruses of Potential Economic Importance in Norton, Chardonel, and Vignoles
Grapevine Survey for viruses of potential economic importance in Norton, Chardonel, and Vignoles James E. Schoelz Dean Volenberg Division of Plant Sciences University of Missouri Columbia MO The 2017 virus survey: Missouri vineyards tested for the presence of 26 different viruses 25 hybrid grape cultivars tested 400 samples collected in July through a prearranged pattern to avoid bias towards selection of virus-infected plants Each sample was a composite of 4 vines (for a total of 1600 vines sampled) Each sample tested for 26 different viruses Table 2. Virus incidence in each cultivar Muscat Survey Average Survey Valvin Cabernet franc Cabernet Traminette Cloeta Vidal blanc Vignoles Chardonel Norton Vivant Vincent Catawba Rayon Saperavi Noiret Viognier Foch Crimson Cabernet Concord Cayuga Chambourcin Muench Lenior Wetumka Albania Virus Hidalgo GRSPaV3 58.71 100 100 46.7 0 100 100 0 15.0 80.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.4 0 0 100 100 100 0 100 100 GLRaV-3 52.7 91.1 88.5 33.3 85.0 3.3 10.0 0 10.0 0 100 40.0 100 40.0 100 100 0 0 100 50.0 50.0 0 0 0 0 100 GRBV 35.0 24.4 4.3 75.5 77.5 26.7 40.0 90.0 0 0 20.0 100 20.0 80.0 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 60.0 20.0 100 GVE 31.0 26.7 85.7 8.9 30.0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 40.0 100 100 0 0 80.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GLRaV-2 19.0 91.1 54.2 6.7 0 26.7 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.0 0 0 0 0 0 GVB 17.2 0 65.7 0 22.5 0 0 0 0 0 10.0 60.0 40.0 0 20.0 100 0 0 80.0 0 10.0 0 0 0 0 0 GVkV 13.5 28.9 38.5 0 15.0 3.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40.0 0 0 0 0 40.0 GLRaV- 9.2 0 1.4 0 72.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60.0 0 0 0 0 0 2RG GVCV 8.2 33.3 1.4 24.4 0 0 20.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.0 0 0 0 10.0 10.0 0 GVA 0.5 0 0 0 2.5 3.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GLRaV-5 0.2 0 0 2.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sample #2 400 45 70 45 40 30 20 10 20 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 11 5 10 10 4 5 10 10 5 1This value is the percentage of the composite samples positive for the selected virus. -
Observations of German Viticulture
Observations of German Viticulture GregGreg JohnsJohns TheThe OhioOhio StateState UniversityUniversity // OARDCOARDC AshtabulaAshtabula AgriculturalAgricultural ResearchResearch StationStation KingsvilleKingsville The Group Under the direction of the Ohio Grape Industries Committee Organized by Deutsches Weininstitute Attended by 20+ representatives ODA Director & Mrs. Dailey OGIC Mike Widner OSU reps. Todd Steiner & Greg Johns Ohio (and Pa) Winegrowers / Winemakers Wine Distributor Kerry Brady, our guide Others Itinerary March 26 March 29 Mosel Mittelrhein & Nahe Join group - Koblenz March 30 March 27 Rheingau Educational sessions March 31 Lower Mosel Rheinhessen March 28 April 1 ProWein - Dusseldorf Depart Observations of the German Winegrowing Industry German wine educational sessions German Wine Academy ProWein - Industry event Showcase of wines from around the world Emphasis on German wines Tour winegrowing regions Vineyards Wineries Geisenheim Research Center German Wine Academy Deutsches Weininstitute EducationEducation -- GermanGerman StyleStyle WinegrowingWinegrowing RegionsRegions RegionalRegional IdentityIdentity LabelingLabeling Types/stylesTypes/styles WineWine LawsLaws TastingsTastings ProWein German Winegrowing Regions German Wine Regions % white vs. red Rheinhessen 68%White 32%Red Pfalz 60% 40% Baden 57% 43% Wurttemberg 30% 70%*** Mosel-Saar-Ruwer 91% 9% Franken 83% 17% Nahe 75% 25% Rheingau 84% 16% Saale-Unstrut 75% 25% Ahr 12% 88%*** Mittelrhein 86% 14% -
2019 Grape Maturity at OSU Research Vineyards Imed Dami, Diane Kinney, Andy Kirk, Yvonne Woodworth, the Ohio State University
OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER 2019 Grape Maturity at OSU Research Vineyards Imed Dami, Diane Kinney, Andy Kirk, Yvonne Woodworth, The Ohio State University. Thanks to the continuous interest by Ohio growers and vintners and support by the Ohio Grape Industries Committee, we are pleased to resume monitoring fruit maturity progression of varieties grown at the research vineyards during the 2019 season. This information will be sent weekly to OGEN subscribers and posted on the program website, Buckeye Appellation. The date of berry sampling and corresponding heat units or growing degree days (GDD) are included. Note that the GDD in your location could be higher or lower than that at our sites. For example, at the Wooster research vineyard, grape ripening of similar varieties is typically 1 to 2 weeks behind central and southern Ohio, and 1 to 2 weeks ahead of more northern latitude vineyards and on Lake Erie shores. To determine the GDD in your location, visit the OSU-GDD Calculator. To learn more about monitoring fruit maturity and berry sampling, please read OSU factsheet at the following link: Are your grapes ready to pick? Click here for Fruit maturity from previous years. We wish you bountiful and successful harvest!! rape maturity of grape varieties at the Wooster research vineyard: G (1) Sampling Date: 8/20/2019 (GDD=2138) 100 Harvest Variety Berry SS (%) pH T.A. (g/L) FMI Date wt (g) Chardonnay 136 15.2 2.93 16.9 9 Chambourcin 187 14.3 2.79 18.3 8 La Crescent 138 17.9 2.89 16.0 11 Marquette 144 18.3 2.90 16.1 11 Regent 169 17.0 3.20 13.3 13 Sauvignon blanc 139 17.5 2.94 16.8 10 *SS: soluble solids, which estimate sugar concentration in grape juice using a refractometer. -
Growing Grapes in Missouri
MS-29 June 2003 GrowingGrowing GrapesGrapes inin MissouriMissouri State Fruit Experiment Station Missouri State University-Mountain Grove Growing Grapes in Missouri Editors: Patrick Byers, et al. State Fruit Experiment Station Missouri State University Department of Fruit Science 9740 Red Spring Road Mountain Grove, Missouri 65711-2999 http://mtngrv.missouristate.edu/ The Authors John D. Avery Patrick L. Byers Susanne F. Howard Martin L. Kaps Laszlo G. Kovacs James F. Moore, Jr. Marilyn B. Odneal Wenping Qiu José L. Saenz Suzanne R. Teghtmeyer Howard G. Townsend Daniel E. Waldstein Manuscript Preparation and Layout Pamela A. Mayer The authors thank Sonny McMurtrey and Katie Gill, Missouri grape growers, for their critical reading of the manuscript. Cover photograph cv. Norton by Patrick Byers. The viticulture advisory program at the Missouri State University, Mid-America Viticulture and Enology Center offers a wide range of services to Missouri grape growers. For further informa- tion or to arrange a consultation, contact the Viticulture Advisor at the Mid-America Viticulture and Enology Center, 9740 Red Spring Road, Mountain Grove, Missouri 65711- 2999; telephone 417.547.7508; or email the Mid-America Viticulture and Enology Center at [email protected]. Information is also available at the website http://www.mvec-usa.org Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction.................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 2 Considerations in Planning a Vineyard ........................................................ -
Phenolic Compounds As Markers of Wine Quality and Authenticity
foods Review Phenolic Compounds as Markers of Wine Quality and Authenticity Vakare˙ Merkyte˙ 1,2 , Edoardo Longo 1,2,* , Giulia Windisch 1,2 and Emanuele Boselli 1,2 1 Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100 Bozen-Bolzano, Italy; [email protected] (V.M.); [email protected] (G.W.); [email protected] (E.B.) 2 Oenolab, NOI Techpark South Tyrol, Via A. Volta 13B, 39100 Bozen-Bolzano, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0471-017691 Received: 29 October 2020; Accepted: 28 November 2020; Published: 1 December 2020 Abstract: Targeted and untargeted determinations are being currently applied to different classes of natural phenolics to develop an integrated approach aimed at ensuring compliance to regulatory prescriptions related to specific quality parameters of wine production. The regulations are particularly severe for wine and include various aspects of the viticulture practices and winemaking techniques. Nevertheless, the use of phenolic profiles for quality control is still fragmented and incomplete, even if they are a promising tool for quality evaluation. Only a few methods have been already validated and widely applied, and an integrated approach is in fact still missing because of the complex dependence of the chemical profile of wine on many viticultural and enological factors, which have not been clarified yet. For example, there is a lack of studies about the phenolic composition in relation to the wine authenticity of white and especially rosé wines. This review is a bibliographic account on the approaches based on phenolic species that have been developed for the evaluation of wine quality and frauds, from the grape varieties (of V. -
CHARDONEL – Still Wine Styles
CHARDONEL – Still Wine Styles MEETING NOTICE The topic for our January meeting is "Chardonel Still Wine Styles". Fifty-nine wineries in Missouri produce wine using the Chardonel grape (1) , making it one of the most popular regional wines. Amateur wine makers in Missouri are fortunate that high quality Chardonel grapes are available from local vineyards. Steve Brunkhorst will lead the meeting, and will share his 2014 vintage Chardonel wines. We will taste his Chardonel produced in glass without flavor or aroma modification, and compare it to the same base wine produced with malolactic fermentation as well the same base wine aged with American oak. We will also taste Chardonel wines from several Missouri wineries. (1) apellationamerica.com CHARDONEL Still Wine Styles Missouri Winemaking Society January 21, 2016 Steve Brunkhorst CHARDONEL – Still Wine Styles Chardonel a cross of Seyval x Chardonnay in 1953. Fruit first observed 1958 Original vine propagated in 1960 Distinguished by superior wine quality combined with high productivity Cold hardiness superior to parent Chardonnay The 4th wine grape cultivar to be named by the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station Cayuga White (1972) Horizon ( 1983) Melody (1986). SOURCE www.hort.cornell.edu CHARDONEL – Still Wine Styles “This hybrid grape is a cross of the famed Chardonnay grape with the popular Seyval Blanc. Chardonel can be fermented in oak or stainless steel barrels, and the grapes produce a dry and full bodied wine. Depending on aging techniques, this hybrid may exude notes -
Matching Grape Varieties to Sites Are Hybrid Varieties Right for Oklahoma?
Matching Grape Varieties to Sites Are hybrid varieties right for Oklahoma? Bruce Bordelon Purdue University Wine Grape Team 2014 Oklahoma Grape Growers Workshop 2006 survey of grape varieties in Oklahoma: Vinifera 80%. Hybrids 15% American 7% Muscadines 1% Profiles and Challenges…continued… • V. vinifera cultivars are the most widely grown in Oklahoma…; however, observation and research has shown most European cultivars to be highly susceptible to cold damage. • More research needs to be conducted to elicit where European cultivars will do best in Oklahoma. • French-American hybrids are good alternatives due to their better cold tolerance, but have not been embraced by Oklahoma grape growers... Reasons for this bias likely include hybrid cultivars being perceived as lower quality than European cultivars, lack of knowledge of available hybrid cultivars, personal preference, and misinformation. Profiles and Challenges…continued… • The unpredictable continental climate of Oklahoma is one of the foremost obstacles for potential grape growers. • It is essential that appropriate site selection be done prior to planting. • Many locations in Oklahoma are unsuitable for most grapes, including hybrids and American grapes. • Growing grapes in Oklahoma is a risky endeavor and minimization of potential loss by consideration of cultivar and environmental interactions is paramount to ensure long-term success. • There are areas where some European cultivars may succeed. • Many hybrid and American grapes are better suited for most areas of Oklahoma than -
Untersuchung Der Transkriptionellen Regulation Von Kandidatengenen Der Pathogenabwehr Gegen Plasmopara Viticola in Der Weinrebe
Tina Moser Institut für Rebenzüchtung Untersuchung der transkriptionellen Regulation von Kandidatengenen der Pathogenabwehr gegen Plasmopara viticola in der Weinrebe Dissertationen aus dem Julius Kühn-Institut Julius Kühn-Institut Bundesforschungsinstitut für Kulturpfl anzen Kontakt/Contact: Tina Moser Arndtstraße 6 67434 Neustadt Die Schriftenreihe ,,Dissertationen aus dem Julius Kühn-lnstitut" veröffentlicht Doktorarbeiten, die in enger Zusammenarbeit mit Universitäten an lnstituten des Julius Kühn-lnstituts entstanden sind The publication series „Dissertationen aus dem Julius Kühn-lnstitut" publishes doctoral dissertations originating from research doctorates completed at the Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI) either in close collaboration with universities or as an outstanding independent work in the JKI research fields. Der Vertrieb dieser Monographien erfolgt über den Buchhandel (Nachweis im Verzeichnis lieferbarer Bücher - VLB) und OPEN ACCESS im lnternetangebot www.jki.bund.de Bereich Veröffentlichungen. The monographs are distributed through the book trade (listed in German Books in Print - VLB) and OPEN ACCESS through the JKI website www.jki.bund.de (see Publications) Wir unterstützen den offenen Zugang zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen. Die Dissertationen aus dem Julius Kühn-lnstitut erscheinen daher OPEN ACCESS. Alle Ausgaben stehen kostenfrei im lnternet zur Verfügung: http://www.jki.bund.de Bereich Veröffentlichungen We advocate open access to scientific knowledge. Dissertations from the Julius Kühn-lnstitut are therefore published open -
Grape Varieties for Indiana
Commercial • HO-221-W Grape Varieties for Indiana COMMERCIAL HORTICULTURE • DEPARTMENT OF HORTICULTURE PURDUE UNIVERSITY COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE • WEST LAFAYETTE, IN Bruce Bordelon Selection of the proper variety is a major factor for fungal diseases than that of Concord (Table 1). Catawba successful grape production in Indiana. Properly match- also experiences foliar injury where ozone pollution ing the variety to the climate of the vineyard site is occurs. This grape is used primarily in white or pink necessary for consistent production of high quality dessert wines, but it is also used for juice production and grapes. Grape varieties fall into one of three groups: fresh market sales. This grape was widely grown in the American, French-American hybrids, and European. Cincinnati area during the mid-1800’s. Within each group are types suited for juice and wine or for fresh consumption. American and French-American Niagara is a floral, strongly labrusca flavored white grape hybrid varieties are suitable for production in Indiana. used for juice, wine, and fresh consumption. It ranks The European, or vinifera varieties, generally lack the below Concord in cold hardiness and ripens somewhat necessary cold hardiness to be successfully grown in earlier. On favorable sites, yields can equal or surpass Indiana except on the very best sites. those of Concord. Acidity is lower than for most other American varieties. The first section of this publication discusses American, French-American hybrids, and European varieties of wine Other American Varieties grapes. The second section discusses seeded and seedless table grape varieties. Included are tables on the best adapted varieties for Indiana and their relative Delaware is an early-ripening red variety with small berries, small clusters, and a mild American flavor. -
Determining the Mesoscale Impact of Climatic Change for Quebec's Winegrowing Bioclimatology
Open Geospatial Viticulture: Determining the Mesoscale Impact of Climatic Change for Quebec©s Winegrowing Bioclimatology Trevor James Smith A thesis In the Department of Geography, Planning, and Environment Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Magisteriate in Science (Geography, Urban, and Environmental Studies) Concordia University Montréal, Québec Canada 24 February 2017 © 2017, Trevor James Smith, Some Rights Reserved Creative Commons 4.0 International BY-NC License (see Annex 6) CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY School of Graduate Studies This is to certify that the thesis prepared by Trevor James Smith Entitled Open Geospatial Viticulture: Determining the Mesoscale Impact of Climatic Change for Quebec©s Winegrowing Bioclimatology and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Magisteriate in Science (Geography, Urban, and Environmental Studies) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final Examining Committee: ____________________________________________________ Chair Dr. Norma Rantisi _________________________________________________Examiner Dr. Norman K. Jones _________________________________________________Examiner Dr. Philippe Roy ________________________________________________Supervisor Dr. H. Damon Matthews Approved by ___________________________________________ Chair of Department ___________________________________________ Dean of Faculty of Arts and Science On ___________________________________________ -
2014 Midwest Small Fruit and Grape Spray Guide Contents Foreword
2 014 Midwest Small Fruit and Grape Arkansas Spray Guide University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service AG1281 Illinois University of Illinois Extension ICSG3-14 Indiana Purdue Extension ID-169 Iowa Iowa State University Extension and Outreach PM 1375 Kansas K-State Research and Extension Kentucky University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service ID-94 Missouri University of Missouri Missouri State University MX377 Nebraska University of Nebraska — Lincoln Extension Ohio Ohio State University Extension 506B2 Oklahoma Oklahoma State University Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service E-987 West Virginia West Virginia University Extension Service Publication 865 Wisconsin University of Wisconsin-Extension A3899 2014 Midwest Small Fruit and Grape Spray Guide Contents Foreword .......................................................................................................................................6 Tips on Using This Spray Guide .................................................................................................13 Grape Spray Schedule .................................................................................................................15 Blueberry Spray Schedule ...........................................................................................................37 Raspberry and Blackberry Spray Schedule .................................................................................42 Strawberry Spray Schedule .........................................................................................................49