THE SUSS-EX CLUB NEWSLETTER NO. 4 March
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Challenging Lesbian and Gay Inequalities in Education. Gender and Education Series. REPORT NO ISBN-0-335-19130-4 PUB DATE 94 NOTE 253P
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 398 296 UD 031 103 AUTHOR Epstein, Debbie, Ed. TITLE Challenging Lesbian and Gay Inequalities in Education. Gender and Education Series. REPORT NO ISBN-0-335-19130-4 PUB DATE 94 NOTE 253p. AVAILABLE FROMOpen University Press, Celtic Court, 22 Ballmoor, Buckingham, MK18 1KW, England, United Kingdom ($27.50); Open University Press, 1900 Frost Road, Suite 101, Bristol, PA 19007. PUB TYPE Books (010) Collected Works General (020) Reports Evaluative/Feasibility (142) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC11 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Academie Achievement; Elementary Secondary Education; *Equal Education; Foreign Countries; *Homophobia; *Homosexuality; Minority Groups; Peer Acceptance; Peer Relationship; *Self Esteem; Sex Education; *Social Discrimination; Social Support Groups; *Student Attitudes IDENTIFIERS *Bisexuality; Homosexual Teachers; United Kingdom ABSTRACT Educators in Britain have tended to ignore lesbian and gay issues, creating a gap that this book addresses by discussing the complex debates about sexuality and schooling. Contributors to this collection tell stories of distress and victimization and of achievement and support in the following: (1) "Introduction: Lesbian and Gay Equality in Education--Problems and Possibilities" (Debbie Epstein); (2)"So the Theory Was Fine" (Alistair, Dave, Rachel, and Teresa);(3) "Growing Up Lesbian: The Role of the School" (Marigold Rogers);(4) "A Burden of Aloneness" (Kola) ;(5) "Are You a Lesbian, Miss?" (Susan A. L. Sanders and Helena Burke);(6) "Victim of a Victimless Crime: Ritual and Resistance" -
Introduction
Notes Introduction 1. I witnessed the demonstrations against Terrence McNally’s play, Corpus Christi, in 1999 at Edinburgh’s Bedlam Theatre, the home of the University’s student theatre company. But these protests were not taken seriously by any- one I knew: acknowledged as a nuisance, certainly, but also judged to be very good for publicity in the competitive Festival fringe. 2. At ‘How Was it for You? British Theatre Under Blair’, a conference held in London on 9 December 2007, the presentations of directors Nicholas Hytner, Emma Rice and Katie Mitchell, writers Mark Lawson, Kwame Kwei-Armah, Tanika Gupta and Mark Ravenhill, and actor and Equity Rep Malcolm Sinclair all included reflection upon issues of censorship, the policing of per- formance or indirect forms of constraint upon content. Ex-Culture Minister Tessa Jowell’s opening presentation also discussed censorship and the closure of Behzti. 3. Andrew Anthony, ‘Amsterdammed’, The Observer, 5 December 2004; Alastair Smart, ‘Where Angels Fear to Tread’, The Sunday Telegraph, 10 December 2006. 4. Christian Voice went on to organise protests at the theatre pro- duction’s West End venue and then throughout the country on a national tour. ‘Springer protests pour in to BBC’, BBC News, 6 January 2005, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/tv_and_radio/4152433.stm [accessed 1 August 2007]. 5. Angelique Chrisafis, ‘Loyalist Paramilitaries Drive Playwright from His Home’, The Guardian, 21 December 2005. 6. ‘Tate “Misunderstood” Banned Work’, BBC News, 26 September 2005, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/entertainment/arts/4281958.stm [accessed 1 August 2007]; for discussion of the Bristol Old Vic’s decision, see Ian Shuttleworth, ‘Prompt Corner’, Theatre Record, 25.23, 6 December 2005, pp. -
The Rosemarie Nathanson Charitable Trust the Shoresh Charitable Trust the R and S Cohen Foundation the Margolis Family the Kobler Trust
SPONSORS THE ROSEMARIE NATHANSON CHARITABLE TRUST THE SHORESH CHARITABLE TRUST THE R AND S COHEN FOUNDATION THE MARGOLIS FAMILY THE KOBLER TRUST BANK LEUMI (UK) DIGITAL MARKETING MEDIA TRAVEL GALA SPONSOR SPONSOR SPONSOR SPONSOR President: Hilton Nathanson Patrons Carolyn and Harry Black Peter and Leanda Englander Isabelle and Ivor Seddon Sir Ronald Cohen and Lady The Kyte Group Ltd Eric Senat Sharon Harel-Cohen Lord and Lady Mitchell Andrew Stone Honorary Patrons Honorary Life Patron: Sir Sydney Samuelson CBE Tim Angel OBE Romaine Hart OBE Tracy-Ann Oberman Helen Bamber OBE Sir Terry Heiser Lord Puttnam of Queensgate CBE Dame Hilary Blume Stephen Hermer Selwyn Remington Lord Collins of Mapesbury Lord Janner of Braunstone QC Ivor Richards Simon Fanshawe Samir Joory Jason Solomons Vanessa Feltz Lia van Leer Chaim Topol Sir Martin Gilbert Maureen Lipman CBE Michael Grabiner Paul Morrison Funding Contributors In Kind Sponsors Film Sponsors The Arthur Matyas & Jewish Genetic Disorders UK - The Mond Family Edward (Oded) Wojakovski with thanks to The Dr. Benjamin Fiona and Peter Needleman Charitable Foundation Angel Foundation The Normalyn Charitable Trust Anthony Filer Stella and Samir Joory Stuart and Erica Peters The Blair Partnership Joyce and David Kustow René Cassin Foundation The Ingram Family The Gerald Ronson Foundation The Rudnick Family Charlotta and Roger Gherson Veronique and Jonathan Lewis The Skolnick Family Jane and Michael Grabiner London Jewish Cultural Centre Velo Partners Dov Hamburger/ Carolyn and Mark Mishon Yachad Searchlight Electric The Lowy Mitchell Foundation 1 Welcome to the 16th UK JeWish Film Festival It is with enormous pleasure that I invite you to join us at the 16th UK Jewish Film Festival which, for the first time, will bring screenings simultaneously to London, Glasgow, Leeds, Liverpool and Manchester. -
Radio 4 Christmas 2004 Highlights
CHRISTMAS HIGHLIGHTS Contents 2 Drama and Readings Factual A Chile Christmas 6 Correspondents Look Ahead 19 A Long Time Dead 4 Crib City 10 All Fingers And Thumbs 17 Crypt Music Kings 18 Ancient And Modern 8 Falling Up 7 Angelic Hosts 5 Food Quiz Special 13 Augustus Carp Esq. By Himself 6 Fractured 5 Boxing Clever 14 Hallelujah! 11 In The Bosom Of The Family 19 If The Slipper Fits 15 Just William – Doin’ Good 14 JM Barrie – Man And Boy 14 Lorna Doone 4 Magic Carpets 3 Peter And Wendy (rpt) 15 Opening Nights: Peter Pan Takes Flight 8 The Adventure Of The Christmas Pudding 9 People’s D-Day 13 The Dittisham Nativity 8 Remember Alistair Cooke 12 The Little White Bird 12 Robert Burns 20 The Nutcracker 3 Santarchy 11 The Sorcerer’s Apprentice 16 Sing Christmas 12 Soul Music 11 Comedy and Entertainment Start The Week 14 The Long Winter 9 Best Of I’m Sorry I Haven’t A Clue 15 The Reunion 13 Fanshawe Gets To The Bottom Of…Christmas 11 Veg Talk 19 Fanshawe Gets To The Bottom Of…The Party Season 19 Wall Of Death 4 Hamish And Dougal Hogmanay Special 19 Who Was Wenceslas And Who Decided He Was Good? 7 Lets Hear It For The King Of Judea 3 The Now Show Christmas Special 10 Religion Roy Hudd’s Tales From The Lodge Room 15 Steven Appleby’s Normal Christmas 8 Christmas In Bethlehem 11 The Write Stuff 17 Christmas Service 11 With Great Pleasure At Christmas 11 Daily Service 9 Festival Of Nine Lessons And Carols 9 Midnight Mass 9 Sunday Worship 13 The Choice 6 3 Saturday 18 December 2004 BBC RADIO 4 Saturday 18 December Magic Carpets 1/1 3.30-4.00pm Let’s Hear It For The King Of Judea 1/1 Seaside entertainer Tony Lidington (who has flown on a magic 10.30-11.00am carpet himself) explores the symbolism and language of carpets. -
Agenda and Papers for 1 February 2018 Board Meeting
Board Meeting Thursday 1 February 2018 Venue: S3.41 (New Boardroom), 3rd floor, Seacole building, 2 Marsham Street, SW1P 4DF Board breakfast 9.00am 75 mins Water Resources pre Stakeholder event Harvey Bradshaw 10.15am informative session with Peter Simpson CEO of 75 mins Anglian Water 1. Apologies Emma Howard Boyd 11.30am 2. Declarations of Interest Emma Howard Boyd 5 mins 3. Minutes of the Board meeting held on 5 Emma Howard Boyd December 2017 and matters arising 4. Topical Update items 4.1 Chief Executive’s update James Bevan 11.35am 4.2 25 Year Environment Plan and EU Exit Harvey Bradshaw 40 mins 5. Committee meetings – oral updates and forward 12.15pm look 20 mins 5.1 Pensions Joanne Segars 5.2 E&B including annual review Gill Weeks 5.3 FCRM Lynne Frostick 5.4 Audit and Risk Assurance including annual Gill Weeks (for review Karen Burrows) 6. Regular update items 6.1 Schemes of Delegation (for approval) Joanne Segars 12.35pm 6.2 Finance report (for information) Bob Branson 10 mins Lunch 12.45pm 30 mins 7. Defra head of function guests – Jac Broughton, Emma Howard Boyd 1.15pm HR Head of Function for the Defra Group and 60 mins John Seglias, DDTS Head of Function for the Defra Group Break 2.15pm 10 mins 8. FCRM GiA final indicative allocation for 2018/19 John Curtin 2.25pm (for approval) 20 mins 9. Charges items 9.1 Levies and Charges (for approval) Bob Branson 9.2 Strategic Review of Charges (for Harvey Bradshaw 2.45pm information) 45 mins 9.3 Mobilising More Money Harvey Bradshaw 10. -
Enter the Man Aaron C
Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2012 Enter the Man Aaron C. Thomas Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF VISUAL ARTS, THEATRE & DANCE ENTER THE MAN By AARON C. THOMAS A Dissertation submitted to the School of Theatre in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2012 Aaron C. Thomas defended this dissertation on October 19, 2012. The members of the supervisory committee were: Mary Karen Dahl Professor Directing Dissertation Patricia Warren Hightower University Representative Elizabeth A. Osborne Committee Member Leigh H. Edwards Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want, first of all, to thank my advisor, Mary Karen Dahl, for believing in this project from the first and as her graduate students always say among ourselves for always making my questions smarter. Many years ago as I was speaking to Dr. Dahl about this project when it was only an idea, she said to me: and isn’t it interesting that Aristotle placed the moment of the greatest release at the same moment as the greatest violence. If I hadnt been convinced that she would be the perfect advisor before that moment, then that sentence certainly confirmed her as the ideal director of this project. I would also like to thank my dissertation committee, Leigh Edwards, Patricia Warren Hightower, Lynn Hogan, and Elizabeth Osborne. -
What Do They Know of England Who Only England Know’: Grosvenor, Ian
University of Birmingham ‘What do they know of England who only England know’: Grosvenor, Ian DOI: 10.1080/0046760X.2017.1420240 Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Grosvenor, I 2018, '‘What do they know of England who only England know’: a case for an alternative narrative of the ordinary in 21st century Britain', History of Education, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 148-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/0046760X.2017.1420240 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in History of Education on 31/01/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/0046760X.2017.1420240 General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. -
Evidence for Equality the Future of Equality in Higher Education
Evidence for Equality The future of equality in higher education Trevor Phillips OBE Professor David Eastwood Armineh Soorenian Professor Chris Brink Simon Fanshawe Contents 3 Introduction 4 Detaching origins from destiny: higher education and the equality agenda Trevor Phillips OBE, Chair of Equality and Human Rights Commission 12 Embedding equality: a HEFCE perspective Professor David Eastwood, Chief Executive of Higher Education Funding Council for England 18 ‘Extreme isolation’: experiences of disabled international students in UK universities Armineh Soorenian, Centre for Disability Studies, University of Leeds 22 ‘Standards will drop’: dispelling fears about the equality agenda in higher education Professor Chris Brink, Vice-chancellor of Newcastle University 42 Sophisticated narratives: equality and the role of governing bodies Simon Fanshawe, Chair of Council, University of Sussex Equality Challenge Unit supports the higher education sector in its mission to realise the potential of all staff and students whatever their race, gender, disability, sexual orientation, religion and belief, or age, to the benefit of those individuals, higher education institutions and society. Introduction Equality and diversity present an increasingly challenging agenda for the higher education sector. We now have seven protected equality areas – gender, race, disability, sexuality, religion, age and gender reassignment. These account for some significant and entrenched inequalities and imbalances in the sector. But the relationship between the equality areas and an individual’s identity is often complex, and the equality areas do not automatically equate to inequality and disadvantage. Evidence for Equality, Equality Challenge Unit’s conference held in Manchester in November 008, sought to engage with these issues. The two-day event focused on using a secure evidence-base that recognises these complexities but also informs actions and priorities. -
Results of an Empirical Study of Sexual Orientation Fairness in the Courts of England and Wales
Buffalo Women's Law Journal Volume 13 Article 5 9-1-2004 Pride and Prejudice: Results of an Empirical Study of Sexual Orientation Fairness in the Courts of England and Wales Todd Brower Western State University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/bwlj Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Sexuality and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Brower, Todd (2004) "Pride and Prejudice: Results of an Empirical Study of Sexual Orientation Fairness in the Courts of England and Wales," Buffalo Women's Law Journal: Vol. 13 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/bwlj/vol13/iss1/5 This Featured Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Buffalo Women's Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PRIDE AND PREJUDICE: RESULTS OF AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION FAIRNESS IN THE COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES BY TODD BROWERI INTRODUCTION There is a reason why city centres and shopping malls often have a sign with an arrow or dot indicating "You are here." Without that information, it is difficult to navigate effectively through unfamiliar territory. That is the dilemma facing decision-makers on issues of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered persons' rights.2 Even when there is agreement on policy goals or purposes, decision- makers often lack concrete, factual information on the personal experiences and treatment of LGBT persons. -
Stonewall's Censorship Champions
Free Speech Union briefing Stonewall’s Censorship Champions Carrie Clark and Shelley Charlesworth July 2021 2 Executive Summary It isn’t necessary to take a position on the validity of LGBT charity Stonewall’s claims about the nature of sex, gender and identity to recognise that they have far-reaching consequences and should therefore be subject to maximum public debate. Since adding transgender rights to its remit in 2015, Stonewall has adopted gender identity ideology and lobbied for self-identified gender to govern many domains of public life previously determined by biological sex. This has entailed the development of an expansive definition of what constitutes “transphobic” speech, encompassing any criticism of gender identity or self-identified gender as concepts. Standpoint epistemology and a belief that linguistic categories can be “oppressive” or “exclusionary” are at the root of much Stonewall policy. Both frameworks further hinder the ability to speak plainly about issues arising from the transgender debate without incurring accusations of transphobia. Through the operation of the Diversity Champions programme and School and College Champion schemes, Stonewall ideology has come to be enacted at the institutional level with relatively little public scrutiny. This has entailed stigmatising and penalising people exercising their speech rights to comment on the repercussions of Stonewall policies. This briefing summarises the impact Stonewall has had on freedom of speech and the process by which the organisation appears to have bypassed