DOCSLIB.ORG

Recognising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples in the Constitution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Recognising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples in the Constitution Report of the Expert Panel January 2012 © Commonwealth of Australia 2012 ISBN 978-1-921975-28-8 (print) ISBN 978-1-921975-29-5 (PDF) ISBN 978-1-921975-30-1 (HTML) Creative Commons licence Except where otherwise noted, all material presented in this document is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution–Non-Commercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au). The details of the relevant licence conditions are available on the Creative Commons website (accessible using the links provided) as is the full legal code for the CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 AU licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/legalcode). This document should be attributed as: Recognising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples in the Constitution: Report of the Expert Panel Disclaimer The material contained in this document has been developed by the Expert Panel on Constitutional Recognition of Indigenous Australians. The views and opinions expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the views of or have the endorsement of the Commonwealth Government or of any minister, or indicate the Commonwealth’s commitment to a particular course of action. In addition, the members of the Expert Panel, the Commonwealth Government, and its employees, officers and agents accept no responsibility for any loss or liability (including reasonable legal costs and expenses) incurred or suffered where such loss or liability was caused by the infringement of intellectual property rights, including the moral rights, of any third person, including as a result of the publishing of the submissions. Inquiries Inquiries regarding the licence and any use of this document are welcome at: Group Manager, Indigenous Policy and Engagement Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs GPO Box 7576 Canberra Mail Centre ACT 2610 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 1800 836 422 This document is available online at www.youmeunity.org.au and at www.fahcsia.gov.au. Editorial, design and artwork by Wilton Hanford Hanover Index by Barry Howarth Printed by Blue Star Print Canberra 16 January 2012 The Hon Julia Gillard MP Prime Minister Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Dear Prime Minister We are pleased to present to you the report of the Expert Panel on Constitutional Recognition of Indigenous Australians, Recognising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples in the Constitution. This report has been prepared in accordance with the Expert Panel’s terms of reference issued on 23 December 2010. Yours sincerely Patrick Dodson Mark Leibler AC Co-chair Co-chair Expert Panel on Constitutional Recognition of Indigenous Australians Letter to the Prime Minister iii Foreword from the co-chairs We present this report to the Prime Minister with the gratitude of all members of the Expert Panel for the opportunity to carry out the important task we were given in December 2010: to investigate how to give effect to constitutional recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. The Panel’s task was to report to the Government on the options for constitutional change and approaches to a referendum that would be most likely to obtain widespread support across the Australian community. The conversation with our fellow Australians took place in communities, towns and cities across the country and gave the Panel invaluable insights into how people from many backgrounds and walks of life want to see their sense of nationhood and citizenship reflected in the Constitution. The consultations the Panel undertook were a reminder of how far Australia has come since the nation’s legal and political foundations were laid down in the late nineteenth century. Then, in line with the values of the times, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples were excluded from the deliberations that led to the adoption of the Constitution. The text of the Constitution excluded them. It was not until two-thirds of the way through the nation’s first century that the exclusion was removed and the Constitution shifted closer to a position of neutrality. The logical next step is to achieve full inclusion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in the Constitution by recognising their continuing cultures, languages and heritage as an important part of our nation and by removing the outdated notion of race. Public participation in and support for the Panel’s consultations and submissions program has been strong. Together with research commissioned by the Panel during 2011, this has given us confidence that the constitutional changes recommended in this report are capable of gaining the overwhelming public support needed to succeed at a referendum. While we believe that the options outlined in this report are capable of succeeding at a referendum, the consequences of failure would be damaging to the nation. An essential pre-condition to gaining the support needed for a successful referendum is cross-party parliamentary support. Notwithstanding their political differences, all major political parties have strongly affirmed the principle of constitutional recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. We believe that significant common ground exists across the political spectrum in relation to the Panel’s recommendations, and that this support has grown as the Panel has carried out its work throughout the year. In this we have been greatly assisted by the Panel’s four parliamentary members. The Panel hopes that all Australians will respond with an open mind to its recommendations. We believe that the current multiparty support creates a window of opportunity to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in and eliminate race-based provisions from the Constitution, provided that the necessary conditions for a successful referendum, as detailed in this report, are in place. It is now for the Government and the Parliament to take the Panel’s recommendations forward. As co-chairs, we would be pleased to assist in this process by participating in discussions and providing advice, including on the extent to which any proposals the Government puts to Parliament are likely to be supported by the Australian community as a whole. Finally, we thank the members of the Panel for their dedication and commitment during the past year, and we also thank the thousands of Australians who have contributed their ideas and their personal experiences to the Panel’s deliberations. Foreword from the co-chairs v Contents Letter to the Prime Minister .............................................................................................................................................................. iii Foreword from the co-chairs ................................................................................................................................................................. v Executive summary..........................................................................................................................................................................................xi Introduction: Expert Panel and its methodology ........................................................................................................1 Background to the establishment of the Expert Panel ....................................................................................... 1 Membership of the Panel.................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Principles to guide the Panel’s assessment of proposals for constitutional recognition .......... 4 Consultation and community engagement ..................................................................................................................... 4 A historic opportunity ...................................................................................................................................................................... 10 1 Historical background.................................................................................................................................................................... 13 1.1 The history of the Australian Constitution ................................................................................................ 13 1.2 ‘Aboriginal natives’ ............................................................................................................................................................ 21 1.3 Colonisation and Aboriginal resistance ......................................................................................................... 22 1.4 ‘White Australia’ ................................................................................................................................................................... 23 1.5 Protection and assimilation ...................................................................................................................................... 24 1.6 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander suffrage ....................................................................................... 26 1.7 Early voices for change ................................................................................................................................................. 28 1.8 The 1967 referendum ....................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Hope for the Future for I Know the Plans I Have for You,” Declares the Lord, “Plans to Prosper You and Not to Harm You, Plans to Give You Hope and a Future

    Hope for the Future for I Know the Plans I Have for You,” Declares the Lord, “Plans to Prosper You and Not to Harm You, Plans to Give You Hope and a Future

    ISSUE 3 {2017} BRINGING THE LIGHT OF CHRIST INTO COMMUNITIES Hope for the future For I know the plans I have for you,” declares the Lord, “plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future Jeremiah 29:11 Lifting their voices What it’s like in their world Our first Children and Youth A new product enables participants Advocate will be responsible to experience the physical and for giving children and young mental challenges faced by people people a greater voice. living with dementia. networking ׀ 1 When Jesus spoke again to the people, he said, I am the light of the world. Contents Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life. John 8:12 (NIV) 18 9 20 30 8 15 24 39 From the Editor 4 Zillmere celebrates 135 years 16 Research paves way for better care 30 networking Churches of Christ in Queensland Chief Executive Officer update 5 Kenmore Campus - ready for the future 17 Annual Centrifuge conference round up 31 41 Brookfield Road Kenmore Qld 4069 PO Box 508 Kenmore Qld 4069 Spiritual Mentoring: Companioning Souls 7 Hope for future managers 19 After the beginnings 32 07 3327 1600 [email protected] Church of the Outback 8 Celebrating the first Australians 20 Gidgee’s enterprising ways 33 networking contains a variety of news and stories from Donations continue life of mission 9 Young, vulnerable and marginalised 22 People and Events 34 across Churches of Christ in Queensland. Articles and photos can be submitted to [email protected].
  • Placing Vulnerability at the Centre of Section 15(1) of the Charter: a Case Comment on Inglis V British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety)

    Placing Vulnerability at the Centre of Section 15(1) of the Charter: a Case Comment on Inglis V British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety)

    Placing Vulnerability at the Centre of Section 15(1) of the Charter: A Case Comment on Inglis v British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety) Connor Bildfell* In order to advance substantive equality under Afin de faire progresser l'dgalite reelle selon the Charter through the section 15(1) frame- la Charte grdce au cadre de l'rticle 15(1), work, Canadian courts should shift towards les tribunaux canadiens devraient adopter un a vulnerability-centric model that focuses on modile centre sur la vulndrabilitiqui accorde protecting individuals and groups who expe- la prioriti & la protection d'individus et de rience vulnerability based on enumerated or groupes qui connaissent la vulndrabilite selon analogous grounds. In adjudicating claims des motifs inumirs ou analogues. Au mo- under section 15(1), Canadian courts have oc- ment de statuer sur des rilamationsen vertu casionally invoked the notion of "vulnerabili- de l'rticle 15(1), les tribunaux canadiens ont ty. "However, the courts have yet to engage in a parfois invoque la notion de la o vulndrabilite thorough discussion of the term's meaning and ). Cependant, ils nontpas encore entami une implications across specific contexts. This arti- discussion approfondie de la signification et la cle explores the meaning and contours of "vul- porte du terme dans des contextesparticuliers. nerability" and analyzes the prospectofusefully L'uteur de cet article examine la signification integratingvulnerability into the section 150) et les contours de la o vulndrabilite ) et fait framework. This includes a discussion of how l'nalyse de la possibilite d'intigrer utilement the section 15(1) test as currently formulated la vulndrabilitidans le cadrede l'article 15(1).
  • NARRATIVE REPORT 31 July – 3 August, 2015

    NARRATIVE REPORT 31 July – 3 August, 2015

    NARRATIVE REPORT 31 July – 3 August, 2015 Message from our Director The Yothu Yindi Foundation is proud to have produced, directed & hosted yet another compelling Garma at the Gulkula ceremonial grounds in northeast Arnhem Land, Northern Territory, Australia. As an indigenous woman, it is difficult to put into words how much of an an honour it is to direct this wonderful experience, as we seek to extract the raw beauty of Australia’s Indigenous people & our incredible cultural heritage. Moreover, I take great pride in staging an event that also provides a healthy economic return to the Arnhem region by tapping the rich veins of the NT's tourism market and beyond. It is a humbling experience to showcase northeast Arnhem Land to the nation and the world as we strive to shape the national & political conversation on Indigenous affairs from a grass roots perspective. The Yothu Yindi Foundation would like to thank everyone who has contributed to the success of Garma. I would personally like to thank our guests for making the pilgrimage north to join us; thank you all for your continued contribution to the reconciliation process between black & white Australia & thank you for taking part in some of the challenging conversations needed to further advance the cause. As in previous years, the 17th annual Garma delivered a wide-ranging program that mixed the exciting with the informative, the eye-catching with the educational, as we sought to provide an action packed program appealing to everyone over four days & nights. Our aim is to develop our activities & objectives through the use of artistic and cultural practices which ensure Yolngu ownership, drive & direction are the foundational anchors to success.
  • The Making of Indigenous Australian Contemporary Art

    The Making of Indigenous Australian Contemporary Art

    The Making of Indigenous Australian Contemporary Art The Making of Indigenous Australian Contemporary Art: Arnhem Land Bark Painting, 1970-1990 By Marie Geissler The Making of Indigenous Australian Contemporary Art: Arnhem Land Bark Painting, 1970-1990 By Marie Geissler This book first published 2020 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2020 by Marie Geissler All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-5546-1 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-5546-4 Front Cover: John Mawurndjul (Kuninjku people) Born 1952, Kubukkan near Marrkolidjban, Arnhem Land, Northern Territory Namanjwarre, saltwater crocodile 1988 Earth pigments on Stringybark (Eucalyptus tetrodonta) 206.0 x 85.0 cm (irreg) Collection Art Gallery of South Australia Maude Vizard-Wholohan Art Prize Purchase Award 1988 Accession number 8812P94 © John Mawurndjul/Copyright Agency 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements .................................................................................. vii Prologue ..................................................................................................... ix Theorizing contemporary Indigenous art - post 1990 Overview ................................................................................................
  • 1 Heat Treatment This Is a List of Greenhouse Gas Emitting

    1 Heat Treatment This Is a List of Greenhouse Gas Emitting

    Heat treatment This is a list of greenhouse gas emitting companies and peak industry bodies and the firms they employ to lobby government. It is based on data from the federal and state lobbying registers.* Client Industry Lobby Company AGL Energy Oil and Gas Enhance Corporate Lobbyists registered with Enhance Lobbyist Background Limited Pty Ltd Corporate Pty Ltd* James (Jim) Peter Elder Former Labor Deputy Premier and Minister for State Development and Trade (Queensland) Kirsten Wishart - Michael Todd Former adviser to Queensland Premier Peter Beattie Mike Smith Policy adviser to the Queensland Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy, LHMU industrial officer, state secretary to the NT Labor party. Nicholas James Park Former staffer to Federal Coalition MPs and Senators in the portfolios of: Energy and Resources, Land and Property Development, IT and Telecommunications, Gaming and Tourism. Samuel Sydney Doumany Former Queensland Liberal Attorney General and Minister for Justice Terence John Kempnich Former political adviser in the Queensland Labor and ACT Governments AGL Energy Oil and Gas Government Relations Lobbyists registered with Government Lobbyist Background Limited Australia advisory Pty Relations Australia advisory Pty Ltd* Ltd Damian Francis O’Connor Former assistant General Secretary within the NSW Australian Labor Party Elizabeth Waterland Ian Armstrong - Jacqueline Pace - * All lobbyists registered with individual firms do not necessarily work for all of that firm’s clients. Lobby lists are updated regularly. This
  • Aboriginal Art - Resistance and Dialogue

    Aboriginal Art - Resistance and Dialogue

    University of New South Wales College of Fine Arts School of Art Theory ABORIGINAL ART - RESISTANCE AND DIALOGUE The Political Nature and Agency of Aboriginal Art A thesis submitted by Lee-Anne Hall in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Art Theory CFATH709.94/HAL/l Ill' THE lJNIVERSllY OF NEW SOUTH WALES COLLEGE OF FINE ARTS Thesis/Project Report Sheet Surnune or Funily .nune· .. HALL .......................................................................................................................................................-....... -............ · · .... U · · MA (TH' rn ....................................... AbbFinlname: . ·......... ' ....d ........... LEE:::ANNE ......................lend.............. ................. Oher name/1: ..... .DEBaaAH. ....................................- ........................ -....................... .. ,CVlalJOn, or C&ltltal &1YCOIn '"" NVCfllt)'ca It:.... ..................... ( ............................................ School:. .. ART-����I��· ...THEORY ....... ...............................··N:t�;;�?A�c·���JlacjTn·ar··................................... Faculty: ... COLLEGE ... OF. ...·Xr"t F.J:blll:...................... .AR'J: ..................... .........................-........................ n,1e:........ .................... •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• .. •••••• .. •••••••••••••••••••••••••• .. •• • .. ••••• .. ••••••••••• ..••••••• .................... H ................................................................ -000000000000••o00000000
  • Australian Indigenous Petitions

    Australian Indigenous Petitions

    Australian Indigenous Petitions: Emergence and Negotiations of Indigenous Authorship and Writings Chiara Gamboz Dissertation Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of New South Wales School of Arts and Media Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences October 2012 ORIGINALITY STATEMENT 'l hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by others, with whom I have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the proiect's design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged.' Signed 5 o/z COPYRIGHT STATEMENT 'l hereby grant the University of New South Wales or its agents the right to archive and to make available my thesis or digsertation in whole or part in the Univercity libraries in all forms of media, now or here after known, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I retain all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertiation.
  • Appellants – Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta

    Appellants – Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta

    File No. 33340 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL OF ALBERTA) BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ALBERTA (MINISTER OF ABORIGINAL AFFAIRS AND NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT) and REGISTRAR, METIS SETTLEMENTS LAND REGISTRY APPELLANTS (Respondents) -and- BARBARA CUNNINGHAM and JOHN KENNETH CUNNINGHAM, LA WRENT (LAWRENCE) CUNNINGHAM, RALPH CUNNINGHAM, LYNN NOSKEY, GORDON CUNNINGHAM, ROGER CUNNINGHAM AND RAY STUART RESPONDENTS (Appellants) -and- ATTORNEY GENERAL OF QUEBEC ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SASKATCHEWAN ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO INTERVENERS APPELLANTS' FACTUM Mr. Robert J. Normey Henry S. Brown, Q.C. Mr. David Kamal Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP Attorney General of Alberta Suite 2600 4th Floor 160 Elgin Street Bowker Building Ottawa, Ontario 9833 - 109th Street KIP 1C3 Edmonton, Alberta T5K2E8 Tel.: 780422-9532 Tel.: 613 233-1781 Fax: 780425-0307 Fax: 613 788-3433 [email protected] henry. [email protected] Counsel for the Appellants Agent for the Appellants -11- Mr. Kevin Feth Mr. Dougald E. Brown Field LLP Nelligan O'Brien Payne LLP Suite 2000 Suite 1500 10235 - 101 Street 50 O'Connor Street Edmonton, Alberta Ottawa, Ontario T5J 3GI KIP 6L2 Tel.: 780423-7626 Tel.: 613 231-8210 Fax: 780424-7116 Fax: 613 788-3661 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for the Respondents Agent for the Respondents Ms. Isabelle Harnois Mr. Pierre Landry Attorney General of Quebec Noill & Associes 2nd Floor III Champlain Street 1200 Route de l'Eglise Gatineau, Quebec Ste-Foy, Quebec J8X 3RI GlY 4MI Tel.: 418 643-1477 Tel.: 819771-7393 Fax: 418 646-1696 Fax: 819771-5397 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for the Intervener Agent for the Intervener Attorney General of Quebec Attorney General of Quebec Attorney General of Saskatchewan Brian A.
  • Hon Penny Sharpe

    Hon Penny Sharpe

    NSW Legislative Council Hansard Page 1 of 3 NSW Legislative Council Hansard Rice Marketing Amendment (Prevention of National Competition Policy Penalties) Bill Extract from NSW Legislative Council Hansard and Papers Wednesday 16 November 2005. The Hon. PENNY SHARPE [5.43 p.m.] (Inaugural speech): I support the Rice Marketing Authority (Prevention of National Competition Council Penalties) Amendment Bill. As this is my first speech in this place I wish to formally acknowledge that we hold our deliberations on the land of the Gadigal people of the Eora nation. I pay my respects to elders past and present and to the Aboriginal people present here today. I thank the members of the House for their courtesy and indulgence as I take this opportunity to talk about the path that has brought me to this place, the values I have gained on the way, and what I hope to achieve as a member of Parliament. I joined the Labor Party when I was 19 for the very simple reason that I wanted to change the world— immediately. It is taking a little longer than I expected. But although I know now that commitment to change must be matched with patience and perseverance, I still believe in the principles and values I held as a young woman at her first Labor Party branch meeting. Australia is a nation of abundant wealth—in our environment, in our people, in our diversity and in our spirit. We are able to care for all of our citizens. That we do not is a burning injustice. I could not and cannot accept that in a wealthy nation like Australia we tolerate the poverty, the violence and the plain unfairness that too many Australians experience day after day.
  • The Supreme Court of Canada and Constitutional (Equality) Baselines

    The Supreme Court of Canada and Constitutional (Equality) Baselines

    Osgoode Hall Law Journal Volume 50, Issue 3 (Spring 2013) Rights Constitutionalism and the Canadian Charter of Article 7 Rights and Freedoms Guest Editors: Benjamin L. Berger & Jamie Cameron The uprS eme Court of Canada and Constitutional (Equality) Baselines Rosalind Dixon Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Special Issue Article Citation Information Dixon, Rosalind. "The uS preme Court of Canada and Constitutional (Equality) Baselines." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 50.3 (2013) : 637-668. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol50/iss3/7 This Special Issue Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode Hall Law Journal by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. The uprS eme Court of Canada and Constitutional (Equality) Baselines Abstract In its approach to defining “analogous grounds” for the purposes of subsection 15(1) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Supreme Court of Canada has adopted an unusual mix of broad and generous interpretation, and high formalism. This article argues that one potential reason for this is the degree of heterogeneity among the nine distinct enumerated grounds in section 15. Heterogeneity of this kind can produce quite different interpretive consequences, depending on whether a court adopts a direct, “multi- pronged,” or a more synthetic, “common denominator,” approach to the question of analogical development. The ourC t, over time, has implicitly shifted from the first to the second of these approaches. For comparative constitutional scholars, a lesson of Canadian Charter jurisprudence is thus that the number and scope of the analogical baseline categories in a constitution—and how courts approach their relationship to each other—can matter a great deal for the subsequent recognition of new constitutional categories.
  • Genesis of the Duty to Consult & Supreme Court

    Genesis of the Duty to Consult & Supreme Court

    THE GENESIS OF THE DUTY TO CONSULT AND THE SUPERME COURT The judicial genesis of the legal duty of consultation began with a series of Aboriginal right and title decisions providing the foundational principles of the duty to consult. Guerin Beginning prior to the repatriation of Canada’s constitution, the Supreme Court in Guerin1 found that the Crown had violated its fiduciary duty to the band by failing to consult with them when they accepted a lesser lease and unilaterally changed the legal position of the band, without their knowledge or consent. Justice Dickson stated “In obtaining, without consultation, a much less valuable lease than the promised, the Crown, breached the fiduciary obligation it owed the band.” Sparrow Then in 1990, the Supreme Court in Sparrow2 deliberated its first post 1982 Aboriginal rights case to explore the content of s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 19823 where the court expressly limited Crown power and conduct by affirming a duty to consult with West Coast Salish asserting their inherent and constitutionally protected right to fish through a ‘justification test’ where the duty to consult is one factor to be considered when justifying an infringement on Aboriginal rights. Van der Peet In 1996 the Supreme Court further developed foundational principles on the duty to consult in their adjudication of the definition of an Aboriginal right in R v Van der Peet.4 Van Der Peet is important for proving CHRs off reserve. Nikal Next in 1996, another Supreme Court decision constraining crown power and affirming the duty to consult regarding resources to which Aboriginal peoples make claim was made in Nikal, where Cory J.
  • Hon Peter Primrose

    Hon Peter Primrose

    Legislative Council 28/05/96 Budget Estimates And Related Papers Hansard Extract The Hon. P. T. PRIMROSE [8.44]: I support the New South Wales Labor Government's 1996-97 budget. However, as this is my first speech in this place, I seek the indulgence of the House to make a few personal comments before moving on to address the budget. I became a member of this House as the result of the vacancy left by Paul O'Grady. I know it is a cliche, but while I am here to fill the vacancy left by Paul, I can never hope to replace him. Paul brought to this place special skills and talents that he used for the benefit of the labour movement and the broader community of this State. I deeply respect him for his courage and strength, and my best wishes and those of his many other friends will always be with him. I feel very privileged to be a representative of the Australian Labor Party in this Parliament and, like Paul O'Grady, to also share in the traditions and the strengths of the New South Wales Left. I feel equally privileged to have been the ALP member for Camden in the Legislative Assembly from 1988 to 1991, having won that marginal seat, I believe, because of our strong campaign against guns. While a member in the other place I had the privilege of working with someone I regard as having been the best representative member that I have ever met: Bill Lovelee, who was the honourable member for Bass Hill.