Postgaardi.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Protist Phylogeny and the High-Level Classification of Protozoa
Europ. J. Protistol. 39, 338–348 (2003) © Urban & Fischer Verlag http://www.urbanfischer.de/journals/ejp Protist phylogeny and the high-level classification of Protozoa Thomas Cavalier-Smith Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK; E-mail: [email protected] Received 1 September 2003; 29 September 2003. Accepted: 29 September 2003 Protist large-scale phylogeny is briefly reviewed and a revised higher classification of the kingdom Pro- tozoa into 11 phyla presented. Complementary gene fusions reveal a fundamental bifurcation among eu- karyotes between two major clades: the ancestrally uniciliate (often unicentriolar) unikonts and the an- cestrally biciliate bikonts, which undergo ciliary transformation by converting a younger anterior cilium into a dissimilar older posterior cilium. Unikonts comprise the ancestrally unikont protozoan phylum Amoebozoa and the opisthokonts (kingdom Animalia, phylum Choanozoa, their sisters or ancestors; and kingdom Fungi). They share a derived triple-gene fusion, absent from bikonts. Bikonts contrastingly share a derived gene fusion between dihydrofolate reductase and thymidylate synthase and include plants and all other protists, comprising the protozoan infrakingdoms Rhizaria [phyla Cercozoa and Re- taria (Radiozoa, Foraminifera)] and Excavata (phyla Loukozoa, Metamonada, Euglenozoa, Percolozoa), plus the kingdom Plantae [Viridaeplantae, Rhodophyta (sisters); Glaucophyta], the chromalveolate clade, and the protozoan phylum Apusozoa (Thecomonadea, Diphylleida). Chromalveolates comprise kingdom Chromista (Cryptista, Heterokonta, Haptophyta) and the protozoan infrakingdom Alveolata [phyla Cilio- phora and Miozoa (= Protalveolata, Dinozoa, Apicomplexa)], which diverged from a common ancestor that enslaved a red alga and evolved novel plastid protein-targeting machinery via the host rough ER and the enslaved algal plasma membrane (periplastid membrane). -
The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231610049 The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes Article in Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology · September 2012 DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 961 2,825 25 authors, including: Sina M Adl Alastair Simpson University of Saskatchewan Dalhousie University 118 PUBLICATIONS 8,522 CITATIONS 264 PUBLICATIONS 10,739 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Christopher E Lane David Bass University of Rhode Island Natural History Museum, London 82 PUBLICATIONS 6,233 CITATIONS 464 PUBLICATIONS 7,765 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Biodiversity and ecology of soil taste amoeba View project Predator control of diversity View project All content following this page was uploaded by Smirnov Alexey on 25 October 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. The Journal of Published by the International Society of Eukaryotic Microbiology Protistologists J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 59(5), 2012 pp. 429–493 © 2012 The Author(s) Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology © 2012 International Society of Protistologists DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes SINA M. ADL,a,b ALASTAIR G. B. SIMPSON,b CHRISTOPHER E. LANE,c JULIUS LUKESˇ,d DAVID BASS,e SAMUEL S. BOWSER,f MATTHEW W. BROWN,g FABIEN BURKI,h MICAH DUNTHORN,i VLADIMIR HAMPL,j AARON HEISS,b MONA HOPPENRATH,k ENRIQUE LARA,l LINE LE GALL,m DENIS H. LYNN,n,1 HILARY MCMANUS,o EDWARD A. D. -
Systema Naturae. the Classification of Living Organisms
Systema Naturae. The classification of living organisms. c Alexey B. Shipunov v. 5.601 (June 26, 2007) Preface Most of researches agree that kingdom-level classification of living things needs the special rules and principles. Two approaches are possible: (a) tree- based, Hennigian approach will look for main dichotomies inside so-called “Tree of Life”; and (b) space-based, Linnaean approach will look for the key differences inside “Natural System” multidimensional “cloud”. Despite of clear advantages of tree-like approach (easy to develop rules and algorithms; trees are self-explaining), in many cases the space-based approach is still prefer- able, because it let us to summarize any kinds of taxonomically related da- ta and to compare different classifications quite easily. This approach also lead us to four-kingdom classification, but with different groups: Monera, Protista, Vegetabilia and Animalia, which represent different steps of in- creased complexity of living things, from simple prokaryotic cell to compound Nature Precedings : doi:10.1038/npre.2007.241.2 Posted 16 Aug 2007 eukaryotic cell and further to tissue/organ cell systems. The classification Only recent taxa. Viruses are not included. Abbreviations: incertae sedis (i.s.); pro parte (p.p.); sensu lato (s.l.); sedis mutabilis (sed.m.); sedis possi- bilis (sed.poss.); sensu stricto (s.str.); status mutabilis (stat.m.); quotes for “environmental” groups; asterisk for paraphyletic* taxa. 1 Regnum Monera Superphylum Archebacteria Phylum 1. Archebacteria Classis 1(1). Euryarcheota 1 2(2). Nanoarchaeota 3(3). Crenarchaeota 2 Superphylum Bacteria 3 Phylum 2. Firmicutes 4 Classis 1(4). Thermotogae sed.m. 2(5). -
Phylogeny of Deep-Level Relationships Within Euglenozoa Based on Combined Small Subunit and Large Subunit Ribosomal DNA Sequence
PHYLOGENY OF DEEP-LEVEL RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN EUGLENOZOA BASED ON COMBINED SMALL SUBUNIT AND LARGE SUBUNIT RIBOSOMAL DNA SEQUENCES by BING MA (Under the Direction of Mark A. Farmer) ABSTRACT My master’s research addressed questions about the evolutionary histories of Euglenozoa, with special attention given to deep-level relationships among taxa. The Euglenozoa are a putative early-branching assemblage of flagellated Eukaryotes, comprised primarily by three subgroups: euglenids, kinetoplastids and diplonemids. The goals of my research were to 1) evaluate the phylogenetic potential of large subunit ribosomal DNA (LSU rDNA) gene sequences as a molecular marker; 2) construct a phylogeny for the Euglenozoa to address their deep-level relationships; 3) provide morphological data of the flagellate Petalomonas cantuscygni to infer its evolutionary position in Euglenozoa. A dataset based on LSU rDNA sequences combined with SSU rDNA from thirty-nine taxa representing every subgroup of Euglenozoa and outgroup species was used for testing relationships within the Euglenozoa. Our results indicate that a) LSU rDNA is a useful marker to infer phylogeny, b) euglenids and diplonemdis are more closely related to one another than either is to the kinetoplatids and c) Petalomonas cantuscygni is closely related to the diplonemids. INDEX WORDS: Euglenozoa, phylogenetic inference, molecular evolution, 28S rDNA, LSU rDNA, 18S rDNA, SSU rDNA, euglenids, diplonemids, kinetoplastids, conserved core regions, expansion segments, TOL PHYLOGENY OF DEEP-LEVEL RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN EUGLENOZOA BASED ON COMBINED SMALL SUBUNIT AND LARGE SUBUNIT RIBOSOMAL DNA SEQUENCES by BING MA B. Med., Zhengzhou University, P. R. China, 2002 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2005 © 2005 Bing Ma All Rights Reserved PHYLOGENY OF DEEP-LEVEL RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN EUGLENOZOA BASED ON COMBINED SMALL SUBUNIT AND LARGE SUBUNIT RIBOSOMAL DNA SEQUENCES by BING MA Major Professor: Mark A. -
Co-Evolution of Epibiotic Bacteria Associated with the Novel
Identity of epibiotic bacteria on symbiontid euglenozoans in O2-depleted marine sediments: evidence for symbiont and host co-evolution 1*Edgcomb, V.P., 2Breglia, S.A., 2Yubuki, N., 3Beaudoin, D., 4Patterson, D.J., 2Leander, B.S. and 1Bernhard, J.M. 1Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Geology and Geophysics Department, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA 2Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Program in Integrated Microbial Biodiversity, Departments of Botany and Zoology, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada 3Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Biology Department, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA 4Marine Biological Laboratory, Biodiversity Informatics, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA. Running title: Identity of epibionts on symbiontid euglenozoans Keywords: Symbiontida, epibionts, epsilon-proteobacteria, Calkinsia, Bihospites, co-evolution, sulfide Subject categories: 1) Microbe-microbe and microbe-host interactions 2) Evolutionary genetics *Corresponding author Abstract A distinct subgroup of euglenozoans, referred to as the “Symbiontida,” has been described from oxygen-depleted and sulfidic marine environments. By definition, all members of this group carry epibionts that are intimately associated with underlying mitochondrion-derived organelles beneath the surface of the hosts. We have used molecular phylogenetic and ultrastructural evidence to identify the rod-shaped epibionts of two members of this group, Calkinsia aureus and Bihospites bacati, hand-picked from sediments from two separate oxygen-depleted, sulfidic environments. We identify their epibionts as closely related sulfur or sulfide oxidizing members of the Epsilon proteobacteria. The Epsilon proteobacteria generally play a significant role in deep-sea habitats as primary colonizers, primary producers, and/or in symbiotic associations. The epibionts likely fulfill a role in detoxifying the immediate surrounding environment for these two different hosts. -
Inventory and Evolution of Mitochondrion-Localized Family a DNA Polymerases in Euglenozoa
pathogens Article Inventory and Evolution of Mitochondrion-localized Family A DNA Polymerases in Euglenozoa Ryo Harada 1, Yoshihisa Hirakawa 2 , Akinori Yabuki 3, Yuichiro Kashiyama 4,5, Moe Maruyama 5, Ryo Onuma 6, Petr Soukal 7 , Shinya Miyagishima 6, Vladimír Hampl 7, Goro Tanifuji 8 and Yuji Inagaki 1,2,9,* 1 Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan; [email protected] 3 Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokosuka 236-0001, Japan; [email protected] 4 Department of Applied Chemistry and Food Science, Fukui University of Technology, Fukui 910-8505, Japan; [email protected] 5 Graduate School of Engineering, Fukui University of Technology, Fukui 910-8505, Japan; [email protected] 6 Department of Gene Function and Phenomics, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima 411-8540, Japan; [email protected] (R.O.); [email protected] (S.M.) 7 Department of Parasitology, Charles University, Faculty of Science, BIOCEV, 252 42 Vestec, Czech Republic; [email protected] (P.S.); [email protected] (V.H.) 8 Department of Zoology, National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba 305-0005, Japan; [email protected] 9 Center for Computational Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 1 February 2020; Accepted: 30 March 2020; Published: 1 April 2020 Abstract: The order Trypanosomatida has been well studied due to its pathogenicity and the unique biology of the mitochondrion. -
Diversity and Biogeography of Diplonemid and Kinetoplastid Protists in Global Marine Plankton
School of Doctoral Studies in Biological Sciences UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH BOHEMIA, FACULTY OF SCIENCE Diversity and biogeography of diplonemid and kinetoplastid protists in global marine plankton Ph.D. Thesis M.Sc. Olga Flegontova Supervisor: Aleš Horák, Ph.D. Biology Centre CAS, Institute of Parasitology České Budějovice, 2017 This thesis should be cited as: Flegontova, O, 2017: Diversity and biogeography of diplonemid and kinetoplastid protists in global marine plankton. Ph.D. Thesis. University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, School of Doctoral Studies in Biological Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic, 121 pp. Annotation The PhD thesis is composed of three published papers, one manuscript submitted for publication and one manuscript in preparation. The main research goal was investigating the diversity of marine planktonic protists using the metabrcoding approach. The worldwide dataset of the Tara Oceans project including small subunit ribosomal DNA metabarcodes (the V9 region) was used. The first paper investigated general patterns of protist abundance and diversity in a global set of samples from the photic zone of the ocean. Diplonemids, a sub- group of Euglenozoa, emerged as one of the most diverse lineages. The second paper was a mini-review highlighting this unexpected result on diplonemids. The third paper provided a detailed characteristic of the diversity, abundance and community structure of diplonemids and revealed them as the most species-rich eukaryotic clade in the plankton. The submitted manuscript was focused on the same topics related to planktonic kinetoplastids, the sister- group of diplonemids. The manuscript in preparation will describe the creation of a curated reference database of excavate 18S rDNA sequences, including those of diplonemids and kinetoplastids, that will be indispensable for analyses of environmental high-throughput metabarcoding data. -
A Revised Six-Kingdom System of Life
Hi ul. R iv. ' 1998,', 73, p p . 203-266 printed in the United Kingdom © Cambridge Philosophical Society 203 A revised six-kingdom system of life T. CAVALIER-SMITH Evolutionary Biology Programme, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research , Department o f Botany , University o f British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T If4 (.Received 27 M arch 1 9 9 6 ; revised 15 December 1 9 9 7 ; accepted 18 December 1997) ABSTRACT A revised six-kingdom system of life is presented, down to the level of infraphylum. As in my 1983 system Bacteria are treated as a single kingdom, and eukaryotes are divided into only five kingdoms: Protozoa, Animalia, Fungi, Plantae and Chromista. Interm ediate high level categories (superkingdom, subkingdom, branch, infrakingdom, supcrphylum, subphylum and infraphylum) arc extensively used lo avoid splitting organisms into an excessive num ber of kingdoms and phyla (60 only being recognized). The two ‘zoological ’ kingdoms. Protozoa and Animalia, are subject to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, the kingdom Bacteria to the International Code of Bacteriological Nomenclature, and the three ‘botanical’ kingdoms (Plantae, Fungi, Chromista) lo the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, Circumscrip tions of the kingdoms Bacteria and Plantae remain unchanged since Cavalicr-Smith (1981). The kingdom Fungi is expanded by adding M icrosporidia, because of protein sequence evidence that these amitochondrial intracellular parasites are related to conventional Fungi, not Protozoa. Fungi arc subdivided into four phyla and 20 classes; fungal classification at the rank of subclass and above is comprehensively revised. The kingdoms Protozoa and Animalia are modified in the light of molecular phylogenetic evidence that Myxozoa arc actually Animalia, not Protozoa, and that mesozoans arc related lo bilaterian animals. -
Mitochondrial RNA Editing and Processing in Diplonemid Protists
Chapter 6 Mitochondrial RNA Editing and Processing in Diplonemid Protists Drahomíra Faktorová, Matus Valach, Binnypreet Kaur, Gertraud Burger, and Julius Lukeš Abstract RNA editing and processing in the mitochondrion of Diplonema papillatum and other diplonemids are arguably the most complex processes of their kind described in any organelle so far. Prior to translation, each transcript has to be accurately trans-spliced from gene fragments encoded on different circular chromosomes. About half of the transcripts are massively edited by several types of substitution editing and addition of blocks of uridines. Comparative analysis of mitochondrial RNA processing among the three euglenozoan groups, diplonemids, kinetoplastids, and euglenids, highlights major differences between these lineages. Diplonemids remain poorly studied, yet they were recently shown to be extremely diverse and abundant in the ocean and hence are rapidly attracting increasing attention. It is therefore important to turn them into genetically tractable organisms, and we report here that they indeed have the potential to become such. 6.1 Introduction 6.1.1 General Overview It is beyond reasonable doubt that the genome of all extant mitochondria is of bacterial origin and with high confidence derives from a single acquisition of an alpha-proteobacterium by an archaeal cell (Zimorski et al. 2014). The mitochondrial genome was then subject to progressive reduction by downsizing of the endosym- biont genome and via the transfer of genes into the nucleus and subsequent retargeting of their products into the organelle. This led to a stepwise conversion D. Faktorová · B. Kaur · J. Lukeš (*) Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre and Faculty of Sciences, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic e-mail: [email protected] M. -
The New Higher Level Classification of Eukaryotes with Emphasis on the Taxonomy of Protists
J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 52(5), 2005 pp. 399–451 r 2005 by the International Society of Protistologists DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.00053.x The New Higher Level Classification of Eukaryotes with Emphasis on the Taxonomy of Protists SINA M. ADL,a ALASTAIR G. B. SIMPSON,a MARK A. FARMER,b ROBERT A. ANDERSEN,c O. ROGER ANDERSON,d JOHN R. BARTA,e SAMUEL S. BOWSER,f GUY BRUGEROLLE,g ROBERT A. FENSOME,h SUZANNE FREDERICQ,i TIMOTHY Y. JAMES,j SERGEI KARPOV,k PAUL KUGRENS,1 JOHN KRUG,m CHRISTOPHER E. LANE,n LOUISE A. LEWIS,o JEAN LODGE,p DENIS H. LYNN,q DAVID G. MANN,r RICHARD M. MCCOURT,s LEONEL MENDOZA,t ØJVIND MOESTRUP,u SHARON E. MOZLEY-STANDRIDGE,v THOMAS A. NERAD,w CAROL A. SHEARER,x ALEXEY V. SMIRNOV,y FREDERICK W. SPIEGELz and MAX F. J. R. TAYLORaa aDepartment of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4J1, Canada, and bCenter for Ultrastructural Research, Department of Cellular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA, and cBigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, West Boothbay Harbor, ME 04575, USA, and dLamont-Dogherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, New York 10964, USA, and eDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada, and fWadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York 12201, USA, and gBiologie des Protistes, Universite´ Blaise Pascal de Clermont-Ferrand, F63177 Aubiere cedex, France, and hNatural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada (Atlantic), Bedford Institute of Oceanography, PO Box 1006 Dartmouth, NS B2Y 4A2, Canada, and iDepartment of Biology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, Louisiana 70504, USA, and jDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0338, USA, and kBiological Faculty, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, St. -
The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes
Published in Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 59, issue 5, 429-514, 2012 which should be used for any reference to this work 1 The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes SINA M. ADL,a,b ALASTAIR G. B. SIMPSON,b CHRISTOPHER E. LANE,c JULIUS LUKESˇ,d DAVID BASS,e SAMUEL S. BOWSER,f MATTHEW W. BROWN,g FABIEN BURKI,h MICAH DUNTHORN,i VLADIMIR HAMPL,j AARON HEISS,b MONA HOPPENRATH,k ENRIQUE LARA,l LINE LE GALL,m DENIS H. LYNN,n,1 HILARY MCMANUS,o EDWARD A. D. MITCHELL,l SHARON E. MOZLEY-STANRIDGE,p LAURA W. PARFREY,q JAN PAWLOWSKI,r SONJA RUECKERT,s LAURA SHADWICK,t CONRAD L. SCHOCH,u ALEXEY SMIRNOVv and FREDERICK W. SPIEGELt aDepartment of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A8, Canada, and bDepartment of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada, and cDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, 02881, USA, and dBiology Center and Faculty of Sciences, Institute of Parasitology, University of South Bohemia, Cˇeske´ Budeˇjovice, Czech Republic, and eZoology Department, Natural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, United Kingdom, and fWadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, 12201, USA, and gDepartment of Biochemistry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada, and hDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada, and iDepartment of Ecology, University of Kaiserslautern, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany, and jDepartment of Parasitology, Charles University, Prague, 128 43, Praha 2, Czech -
Adl S.M., Simpson A.G.B., Lane C.E., Lukeš J., Bass D., Bowser S.S
The Journal of Published by the International Society of Eukaryotic Microbiology Protistologists J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 59(5), 2012 pp. 429–493 © 2012 The Author(s) Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology © 2012 International Society of Protistologists DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes SINA M. ADL,a,b ALASTAIR G. B. SIMPSON,b CHRISTOPHER E. LANE,c JULIUS LUKESˇ,d DAVID BASS,e SAMUEL S. BOWSER,f MATTHEW W. BROWN,g FABIEN BURKI,h MICAH DUNTHORN,i VLADIMIR HAMPL,j AARON HEISS,b MONA HOPPENRATH,k ENRIQUE LARA,l LINE LE GALL,m DENIS H. LYNN,n,1 HILARY MCMANUS,o EDWARD A. D. MITCHELL,l SHARON E. MOZLEY-STANRIDGE,p LAURA W. PARFREY,q JAN PAWLOWSKI,r SONJA RUECKERT,s LAURA SHADWICK,t CONRAD L. SCHOCH,u ALEXEY SMIRNOVv and FREDERICK W. SPIEGELt aDepartment of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A8, Canada, and bDepartment of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada, and cDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, 02881, USA, and dBiology Center and Faculty of Sciences, Institute of Parasitology, University of South Bohemia, Cˇeske´ Budeˇjovice, Czech Republic, and eZoology Department, Natural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, United Kingdom, and fWadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, 12201, USA, and gDepartment of Biochemistry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada, and hDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada, and iDepartment