DOCSLIB.ORG

Overview of the English Rail System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Overview of the English Rail System House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts Overview of the English rail system Tenth Report of Session 2021–22 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 1 July 2021 HC 170 Published on 7 July 2021 by authority of the House of Commons The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No. 148). Current membership Meg Hillier MP (Labour (Co-op), Hackney South and Shoreditch) (Chair) Mr Gareth Bacon MP (Conservative, Orpington) Kemi Badenoch MP (Conservative, Saffron Walden) Shaun Bailey MP (Conservative, West Bromwich West) Olivia Blake MP (Labour, Sheffield, Hallam) Dan Carden MP (Labour, Liverpool, Walton) Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP (Conservative, The Cotswolds) Mr Mark Francois MP (Conservative, Rayleigh and Wickford) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Peter Grant MP (Scottish National Party, Glenrothes) Antony Higginbotham MP (Conservative, Burnley) Mr Richard Holden MP (Conservative, North West Durham) Craig Mackinlay MP (Conservative, Thanet) Sarah Olney MP (Liberal Democrat, Richmond Park) Nick Smith MP (Labour, Blaenau Gwent) James Wild MP (Conservative, North West Norfolk) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 148. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2021. This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright-parliament/. Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website and in print by Order of the House. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Jessica Bridges-Palmer (Media Officer), Ameet Chudasama (Committee Operations Manager), Richard Cooke (Clerk), Rose Leach (Committee Operations Officer), Ben Rayner (Second Clerk), Ben Shave (Chair Liaison). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Committee of Public Accounts, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 5776; the Committee’s email address is [email protected]. You can follow the Committee on Twitter using @CommonsPAC. Overview of the English rail system 1 Contents Summary 3 Introduction 4 Conclusions and recommendations 5 1 Rail system recovery and reform 8 Encouraging passengers back to the railway 8 Planned rail system reform 10 Oversight of the rail system 11 2 Financial and environmental sustainability 12 Interim National Rail contracts for passenger service delivery 12 Rail network electrification 13 Network Rail’s efficiencies 14 Formal minutes 16 Witnesses 17 Published written evidence 17 List of Reports from the Committee during the current Parliament 18 Overview of the English rail system 3 Summary The rail system in England has suffered from a lack of strategic direction and accountability for many years. The delivery of services has not been focused sufficiently on the needs of passengers, and the system has struggled to improve service reliability, quality and flexibility. The rail system has become increasingly costly for the taxpayer. In 2019–20, the net cost of the system to the taxpayer was £5.1 billion; a 99.7% increase in real terms from 2015–16 to 2019–20. Since March 2020, an estimated £8.5 billion of additional government financial support has also been provided to the system in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the significant cost to the taxpayer, the pandemic presents a highly unusual operating environment, from which lessons should be learned and implemented to improve the system in future. The Government needs to make tough choices and determine priorities about the future of rail. Government intends to move from the previous failed franchise system to new arrangements expected to result from the Williams-Shapps Plan for Rail (the Rail White Paper). At the same time, government must address the impact of COVID-19 on the system and put in place measures to ensure a net zero railway in accordance with its previous commitments. The Department and Network Rail must ensure that rail delivers better services for passengers in a way that meets new travel demands. At the same time the high-cost fixed assets required to run these services need to be maintained, while keeping ticket prices affordable to encourage people to travel by rail. While the Department is aware of the need for improvement across a range of areas we are concerned that the Department has neither the necessary urgency nor appreciates the scale of the challenge ahead. Now is the time to make radical, effective reform in the rail system and aspirations and intentions need to be turned into concrete actions that deliver meaningful change. 4 Overview of the English rail system Introduction The rail system in England involves public bodies (including Network Rail), passenger operators under government contract, and private sector bodies. It is regulated by the Office of Rail and Road. The Department for Transport (the Department) is responsible for setting the strategic direction for the rail system in England. The arrangements between all those involved in delivering rail services involve complex cash flows and accountabilities. The total expenditure of the rail system in 2019–20 was £17.4 billion, made up of £9.5 billion spent on operating rail passenger services, £7.1 billion spent on operating infrastructure and £0.9 billion spent on operating freight services and High Speed 1 (figures do not sum due to rounding). In 2019–20, total rail sector income was £17.1 billion, of which £5.1 billion was government funding. The remaining £12.0 billion was earned income, the majority (80%) of which was earned through passenger fares. The disruption to national rail services following the May 2018 timetable change, and the collapse of the East Coast Rail Franchise in the same month, led the Government to announce the Williams review to examine substantial concerns from across the industry around the rail system’s structural organisation and the delivery of rail services. Those concerns included long-standing issues that have been prevalent in the rail system including: poor passenger service performance, reliability and value for money; fragmentation between bodies in the system and the lack of clear accountability; concerns around cost pressures and financial sustainability; and the ability of the system to respond flexibly to future challenges and opportunities. To add to these challenges, passenger demand has not continued to increase in the way anticipated by the Department and train operators (plateauing at around 1.35 billion journeys per year since 2015–16). This has contributed to problems with the financial sustainability of those franchises whose finances are dependent on continuing to maintain revenues at levels previously anticipated. In addition, during the COVID-19 pandemic the government told the public to stay at home if they could, and without passenger fare income, government stepped in to pay rail operators to keep services running. In doing so, it took on all risks associated with running the railway. The Department now faces an extremely challenging and uncertain environment in which to implement its proposed reforms. Overview of the English rail system 5 Conclusions and recommendations 1. The Department lacks a convincing and timely plan for encouraging passengers back to the railway as part of COVID-19 recovery, and risks an increase in car use. The Department and Network Rail have some plans to encourage people back to rail travel, including increasing the capacity of services and the information available to passengers. However, these plans do not reflect the urgency required to avoid an increase in car use as people begin to travel again, which would undermine the decarbonisation of transport required to meet net zero commitments. Even before the pandemic, passenger demand had plateaued, reflecting a change in travel patterns. Long-standing barriers to rail travel remain unaddressed by the Department. For example, fare reform to reduce the complexity and cost of rail travel and encourage use is long overdue. In addition, it remains unclear how the Department will better integrate rail travel with other modes of public transport, which would improve utility of the whole public transport network and incentivise use. The Department’s own data shows that people are returning to cars faster than to other modes of transport. Without targeted and timely intervention, the opportunity to reinvigorate use of public transport and prevent a car-led recovery will be missed. Recommendation: The Department should write to the Committee by December setting out the actions it is taking to encourage passengers back to the railway. This should include: • a plan for rail fare reform and flexible ticketing post-pandemic; • the steps it is taking to integrate across public transport to provide a joined- up transport system for passengers; and • how Network Rail is actively managing rail timetables and services to respond to emerging demand patterns. 2. In recent years, we have identified serious failings in the rail system, and the Department must now overcome significant long-standing issues to bring about complex reform. We have previously reported on the problems inherent in the rail system, such as: poor performance and reliability of the network; the lack of accountability and Departmental oversight and the Department’s poor management of franchises. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought additional challenges, not least the collapse in passenger demand and associated revenues, and significant financial cost to government and the taxpayer. The Department acknowledges that the rail system faces a complex and deep-rooted set of issues and that collaboration between all bodies in the system will be required to make changes across the sector.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Our Rail and Road Duties
    Our rail and road duties Summary How ORR exercises its functions is governed by various statutory duties which we must take into account when making decisions. Different duties apply depending on whether ORR is exercising its economic or safety functions. These duties are listed below. Economic duties For economic regulation our duties are set out under section 4 of the Railways Act 1993. These duties include the duty to: promote improvements in railway service performance; otherwise to protect the interests of users of railway services; promote the use of the railway network in Great Britain for the carriage of passengers and goods, and the development of that railway network, to the greatest extent that it considers economically practicable; contribute to the development of an integrated system of transport of passengers and goods; contribute to the achievement of sustainable development; promote efficiency and economy on the part of persons providing railway services; promote competition in the provision of railway services for the benefit of users of railway services; promote measures designed to facilitate the making by passengers of journeys which involve use of the services of more than one passenger service operator; impose on the operators of railway services the minimum restrictions which are consistent with the performance of ORR's functions under Part 1 RA 1993 or the RA 2005 that are not safety functions; Office of Rail and Road | 1 enable persons providing railway services to plan the future of their businesses
    [Show full text]
  • Download Publication
    RESILIENCE PRIMER Rail An industry guide to enhancing resilience 2 AUTHORS: Sarah Reeves, Mike Winter, Dominic Leal and Alison Hewitt (TRL) Published by The Resilience Shift in collaboration with TRL May 2019 CITATION REFERENCE Reeves, S., Winter, M., Leal, D., and Hewitt, A. (May 2019) Rail: An industry guide to enhancing resilience. Resilience Primer. TRL and Resilience Shift, UK. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/ CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. 3 ABOUT THE RESILIENCE SHIFT The Resilience Shift exists to inspire and empower a global community to make the world safer through resilient infrastructure. More people than ever depend on the critical infrastructure systems that provide essential energy, water, transport and communications services, and underpin food, healthcare and education. When this infrastructure fails the consequences can be catastrophic. Supported by Lloyd’s Register Foundation and Arup, the Resilience Shift provides knowledge and tools for those responsible for planning, financing, designing, delivering, operating and maintaining critical infrastructure systems. Our aim is to ensure infrastructure systems are able to withstand, adapt to, and recover quickly from anticipated or unexpected shocks and stresses - now and in the future. DEFINING RESILIENCE Resilience is the ability to withstand, adapt to changing conditions, and recover positively from shocks and stresses.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short Guide to Regulation July 2015 Overview About Current and Overview of Regulation Future Challenges Key Regulators
    A Short Guide to Regulation July 2015 Overview About Current and Overview of Regulation future challenges key regulators | About this guide This Short Guide summarises what | Contact details Regulation does, how much it costs, recent and planned changes and what to look out for across its main business areas and services. If you would like to know more about the National Audit SURVEY Office’s (NAO’s) work on Regulation, please contact: Joe Perkins Director of Regulation, Competition and Consumers [email protected] 020 7798 7522 If you are interested in the National Audit Office’s work and The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending for Parliament and is independent of government. The Comptroller and Auditor General support for Parliament more widely, please contact: (C&AG), Sir Amyas Morse KCB, is an Officer of the House of Commons and leads the NAO, which employs some 810 people. The C&AG Adrian Jenner certifies the accounts of all government departments and many other Director of Parliamentary Relations public sector bodies. He has statutory authority to examine and report [email protected] to Parliament on whether departments and the bodies they fund have used their resources efficiently, effectively, and with economy. Our 020 7798 7461 studies evaluate the value for money of public spending, nationally and locally. Our recommendations and reports on good practice For full iPad interactivity, please view this PDF help government improve public services, and our work led to Interactive in iBooks or GoodReader
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitivity of a High-Speed Rail Development on Supply Chain and Logistics Via Air-Rail-Road Freight Transportation
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 28 July 2021 doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2021.685884 Sensitivity of a High-Speed Rail Development on Supply Chain and Logistics via Air-Rail-Road Freight Transportation Rucheng Liu, Anton Stefanovich and Sakdirat Kaewunruen* Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom The casual effect and synergy of high-speed rail development on the modal transport changes in supply chain and logistics have not been considered well during the initial phase of any rail project design and development. This has impaired the systems integration and connectivity among the modes of transport in a region. In the United Kingdom, High Speed 2, a large-scale railway project with a planned completion date in 2033, affects many transport stakeholders. The project influences the existing transport systems, but the transport systems integration design has not been well depicted, resulting in a pressing concern on systems connectivity Edited by: Ampol Karoonsoontawong, and social value. This is evident by many public protests along the planned route King Mongkut’s University of of the project. Therefore, it is important to evaluate different aspects for any Technology Thonburi, Thailand possible changes in supply chains caused by the development of high-speed Reviewed by: rail networks. This paper is the world’s first to provide the sensitivity analysis of Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao, Suranaree University of Technology, supply chains via air-rail-road freight transportation and logistics stemming from Thailand the High Speed 2 case by the rigorous assessments into the capacity, performance Duangdao Watthanaklang, ’ Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat and environmental changes that may follow the project s implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory Futures Review
    Regulatory Futures Review January 2017 Regulatory Futures Review: Contents | i Contents Executive summary .................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 9 2. The regulatory landscape ............................................................................................. 13 3. Current regulatory practice and challenges ................................................................... 19 4. The regulatory future..................................................................................................... 24 5. Government setting high-level principles: outcome-based regulation ............................ 28 6. Increased use of regulated self-assurance and earned recognition ............................... 33 7. Cost recovery................................................................................................................ 44 8. Intelligence and data sharing ........................................................................................ 52 9. Developing expertise within regulators .......................................................................... 57 10. Burdens on regulators ................................................................................................... 61 11. The potential benefits of our proposals ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Assisted Travel: a Consultation Summary & Next Steps April 2018
    Improving Assisted Travel: a consultation summary & next steps April 2018 Summary This document provides a summary of responses to the consultation on Improving Assisted Travel and sets out how we intend to take forward the issues discussed. Introduction 1. Our vision is to empower confident use of the railway by all. Whilst our core responsibility is to ensure that the law is met and standards adhered to, we believe the commitment to accessibility is wider than this narrow remit. 2. As a result of a large-scale programme of research into passengers’ awareness and experience of Assisted Travel, we undertook a consultation on Improving Assisted Travel between 15 November 2017 and 2 February 2018. Both the research and the consultation can be found online at: Office of Rail and Road | 30 April 2018 Improving Assisted Travel | 1 http://orr.gov.uk/rail/consultations/policyconsultations-by- topic/consumer-consultations/improving-assisted- travelconsultation. 3. This document provides a summary of responses to the consultation and sets out how we intend to take forward the issues discussed. 4. In total we received 844 responses. 530 of these were variations of a template that indicated an individual’s support for retaining a guard on services where Driver Only Operation/Driver Controlled Operation is proposed. A further 173 responses were either blank or provided only contact information. We received an additional 100 responses from members of the public, 83 of which were short e-mails focused on staffing on trains and at stations. 5. Responses
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Assisted Travel: a Summary of Consultation Responses; and ORR’S Response and Next Steps July 2019
    Improving Assisted Travel: a summary of consultation responses; and ORR’s response and next steps July 2019 Summary This document provides a summary of responses to our Improving Assisted Travel consultation on changes to Guidance for train and station operators on Disabled People’s Protection Policy (DPPP), explains the changes we have made to the Guidance as a result, and sets out an implementation programme for the improvements that we are requiring. Alongside this document we are publishing revised Guidance, together with regulatory and equality impact assessments. Executive Summary 1. The ORR’s vision is of a railway network where passengers can request assistance with confidence and ease, safe in the knowledge that it will be provided reliably, effectively, and consistently by staff that have Office of Rail and Road | July 2019 | Improving Assisted Travel – Responses summary and next steps | 1 the training and knowledge to do so with confidence and skill. 2. The ORR’s objectives for our work on improving assisted travel1 are to: Bring the DPPP Guidance up to date and ensure passengers have all the information they need to make a journey; Improve the reliability of Passenger Assist; Strengthen train and station operators’ staff training obligations; Raise awareness of the assistance that is available; Introduce other new obligations where there is a good case to do so; and Provide greater clarity of operators’ existing requirements. 3. Underpinned by our extensive research in 2017 into passenger experience and awareness of assisted travel, we sought views on a set of proposed changes to the Disabled People’s Protection Policy (DPPP) Guidance for train and station operators, issued by the Department for Transport (DfT) in 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Pr19 Methodology.Indd
    Agenda Advancing economics in business It’s a tough one: Ofwat’s PR19 methodology In July 2017, Ofwat, the economic regulator of the water industry in England and Wales, published its eagerly awaited consultation on the methodology for the 2019 price review of the sector (PR19). The key message? Across virtually all areas, things will be tougher for companies than at the previous review Ofwat’s consultation paper details how it proposes to Challenge across the board set allowed revenues for the 16 water companies in England and Wales over 2020–25.1 It also puts in place Promoting markets arrangements to help introduce markets at various points in the water and wastewater value chain.2 In PR14 Ofwat introduced separate binding controls for wholesale and retail activities. For PR19, it is taking this to The methodology has wide-reaching implications, and not the next stage by setting separate binding controls to cover only for the water companies themselves. For example, some of the different wholesale activities. This will result in while other regulators have published their strategic vision four controls: for future price reviews,3 Ofwat is the first to set out its proposals in detail—in particular on key assumptions such • water resources—covering raw water sourced from as allowed returns. rivers, reservoirs and boreholes; Now that the dust has settled—and sufficient time has • water ‘network plus’—covering raw water transport, elapsed to digest the 280 pages (plus 15 appendices)—we water treatment and distribution; can take a look at the most important messages from the paper.
    [Show full text]
  • ORR's Economic Enforcement Policy And
    ORR’s economic enforcement policy and penalties statement - Great Britain November 2017 Contents Introduction 4 Summary 4 Background 4 Purpose of this policy 4 Parties in scope of this policy 5 Licence holders 5 Relevant Operators 6 Purpose of enforcement 9 Competition and economic licence enforcement 9 Principles of Prioritisation 10 Chapter 1 Enforcement approach and principles 12 Summary 12 Enforcement approach 12 One-off failures 13 Chapter 2 Monitoring and Investigation 17 Monitoring and investigation 18 Chapter 3 Enforcement Action 21 Summary 21 The legal framework for licence enforcement 21 Chapter 4 Penalties Statement 29 The framework for imposing a penalty 29 Calculating the amount of a penalty 30 Proportionality 31 Levels of Seriousness 31 The A&M Regulations 33 Adjustments for mitigating or aggravating factors 33 Financing duty 34 Reaching a conclusion 34 Statutory enforcement action and senior management remuneration 34 Chapter 5 Publication 36 Summary 36 Publication 36 Revision of policy 36 Annex A – ORR’s Statutory Duties 37 Section 4 of the Railways Act 1993 37 Annex B - A&M Regulation 38 41 Annex C – Procedural requirements for penalties 44 Introduction Summary This document sets out the Office of Rail and Road’s economic enforcement policy and penalties statement relating to Rail. Background 1. The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) is the combined economic and health and safety regulator for Great Britain’s rail network and the regulatory body for railway services in Northern Ireland1. The ORR is also the economic monitor for England’s strategic road network. 2. We regulate railway operators because operating railway assets and providing passenger and freight services are activities of national importance and must be safeguarded in the public interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Rail and Road Annual Report and Accounts 2020-21 June 2021 HC 324
    Office of Rail and Road Annual Report and Accounts 2020-21 June 2021 HC 324 Office of Rail and Road Annual Report and Accounts 2020-21 Report presented to Parliament pursuant to section 74(1) of the Railways Act 1993 Accounts presented to the House of Commons pursuant to section 6 of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 Accounts presented to the House of Lords by Command of Her Majesty Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 24 June 2021 HC 324 © Crown copyright 2021 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/ doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available on our website at: https://www.gov.uk/ official-documents Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at contact.cct@ orr.gov.uk ISBN 978-1-5286-2621-7 CCS0521505194 06/21 Preface About this Annual Report and Accounts This document integrates performance and financial data to help readers gain a better understanding of the work of the Office of Rail and Road (ORR). It covers the activities of ORR from 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021 and is split into three main sections: The Performance Report includes a summary of progress achieved in 2020-21 in delivering our strategic objectives and service standards (the Performance Overview), followed by a fuller review of delivery of our strategic objectives (the Performance Analysis).
    [Show full text]
  • What Will Reform Mean for Britain's Railways?
    148 HelpingNEWS ensure a sustainable future for UK rail freight July 2021 What will reform mean for Britain’s railways? Opportunity of a lifetime to grow freight if Great British Railways reform delivers on promises. P.3 First freight train for The Rail Freight Group (RFG) welcomed the creation of Great British Railways is a unique Port of Sunderland. publication of the Williams – Shapps Plan for opportunity to meet these ambitions if it ensures Rail, which offers the opportunity of a lifetime that private sector rail freight operators can to accelerate the growth of rail freight, flourish, and that customers and suppliers are helping decarbonise UK freight transport and encouraged to invest for growth.” meeting the needs of its customers. She added: “We look forward to working with Under the plans set out by Government a Government as they develop the detailed new organisation, Great British Railways, will proposals, including for reform of track access be created to plan and run the rail network, and a new role for the ORR. It will be essential incorporating Network Rail and passenger that the new structure and systems truly deliver P.4 services. Importantly, the new body will have a on their promise for rail freight.” statutory duty to promote freight, and a national Ports benefit from freight co-ordination team will be created to Reform has been widely welcomed across the 775m freight trains. improve the freight customer experience. freight sector. Eddie Aston, CEO for G&W’s Government will also set a growth target for rail UK/Europe Region companies, said: “We freight, as has been done in Scotland, and will welcome the publication of the Williams-Shapps issue guidance on its priorities for rail freight Plan for Rail.
    [Show full text]
  • 1996-2005 Paul Amos and Lou Thompson
    42020 TRANSPORT NOTES PRAL THEMATIC GROUP Public Disclosure Authorized THE WORLD BANK, WASHINGTON, DC Transport Note No. TRN-36 September 2007 Railways in Development: Global Round-Up 1996-2005 Paul Amos and Lou Thompson This Transport Note has been prepared as an adjunct to the 2006-07 updating of the World Bank’s Railways Databases (www.worldbank.org/railways). It uses the databases for inferences on aggregate trends (and so subject to the caveats provided in the Explanatory Note cited) as well as other Bank documents and sources of policy information. It provides a high level view of traffic and policy developments. Particular emphasis is given to the Bank’s six regions of operations at a time when the Bank’s Transport Strategy is being updated with the intention of increasing the attention given to the role of railways in development. For completeness, important policy developments in the higher income countries are also summarized. The Note has been prepared by Paul Amos, Transport Adviser to the World Bank and Lou Thompson, Railway Consultant, and formerly Railways Adviser to the World Bank. While the content has drawn upon the broad experience and expertise of the Bank in the railway sector, any views expressed herein are strictly those of the authors. as a whole, over 94 percent of rail freight is carried by Public Disclosure Authorized 1. RAILWAYS IN DEVELOPMENT publicly-owned operators. In global terms, the public railway network1 consists of In the passenger sector, railways can also perform a just under a million route-km and is equivalent in length valuable economic and social role in dense inter-city to about 6 percent of the world’s paved road network.
    [Show full text]