DOCSLIB.ORG

Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Survey and Supplemental Testing of the Ocala Ranch Property, Marion County, Florida

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Survey and Supplemental Testing of the Ocala Ranch Property, Marion County, Florida FINAL REPORT PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT SURVEY AND SUPPLEMENTAL TESTING OF THE OCALA RANCH PROPERTY, MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA NÊòÃÙ 2016 PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT SURVEY AND SUPPLEMENTAL TESTING OF THE OCALA RANCH PROPERTY, MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR FARNER BARLEY AND ASSOCIATES, INC. WILDWOOD, FLORIDA PREPARED BY LILLIAN AZEVEDO, PHD SEARCH PROJECT # 3617‐16017P ___________________________________ MICHAEL ARBUTHNOT, MS, RPA PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR SEARCH WWW.SEARCHINC.COM NOVEMBER 2016 SEARCH November 2016 Phase I CRAS and Supplemental Testing of the Ocala Ranch Property, Marion County, Florida Final Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Phase I cultural resource assessment survey (CRAS) was conducted for the approximately 2,079‐acre Ocala Ranch Property, Marion County, Florida. The survey was conducted as due diligence in anticipation of requirements from the Florida Division of Historical Resources (FDHR). The parcel is located approximately one‐half mile northeast of the Withlacoochee River, south of State Road (SR) 200 between Stokes Ferry and Gum Slough. The investigation resulted in the identification of seven newly recorded cultural resources consisting of five prehistoric lithic scatters (8MR3929, 8MR3930, 8MR3931, 8MR3933, and 8MR3934), one historic homestead (8MR3932), and one segment of a historic road (8MR3937). In addition, one previously recorded resource group adjacent to the project area (Drake Ranch, 8MR3722) was updated. Site 8MR3929 consists of a 2.8‐acre low‐density lithic, prehistoric ceramic and historic glass scatter, defined by 29 positive shovel tests. Site 8MR3930 consists of a 17.8‐acre low‐density lithic and ceramic scatter in close proximity to a small freshwater pond. One large triangular projectile point (O’Leno) indicates a Middle or Late Woodland cultural affiliation while the remaining artifacts are not diagnostic. Site 8MR3931 is an 18.5‐acre lithic scatter defined by 82 positive shovel tests that yielded a total of 221 prehistoric artifacts. The only diagnostic artifacts consist of 22 Pasco plain and sand‐tempered plain ceramic sherds. Site MR3932 is defined by 19 positive tests (six shovel tests and 13 metal detector hits) that yielded a total of 56 artifacts. The site covers 0.96 acres and consists of the archaeological remains of a late nineteenth to early twentieth century homestead. No foundation remnants or other historic features were identified. Site 8MR3933 consists of a single positive shovel test that yielded three pieces of tertiary debitage. Site 8MR3934 is a 1.6‐acre lithic scatter defined by six positive shovel tests containing just seven lithic flakes. None of these newly identified prehistoric resources are recommended eligible for listing in the National Register of Historical Places (NRHP). A segment of historic road (8MR3937) associated with the Resource Group 8MR3722 (Drake Ranch) was recorded in the project area. While the road is associated with Drake Ranch, it no longer connects any of the 13 buildings which make up 8MR3722. No other historical remains associated with the Drake Ranch were identified, and 8MR3937 lacks sufficient integrity to merit consideration for listing in the NRHP. SEARCH recommends that the road be considered a non‐contributing element to the Drake Ranch Resource Group (8MR3722). In addition to these newly recorded resources, the Florida Master Site File (FMSF) lists five previously recorded archaeological sites (8MR2351, 8MR2352, 8MR2353, 8MR3788, and 8MR3873) inside the project area. All five sites were previously evaluated by the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and determined not eligible for the NRHP; no testing occurred at these sites for this project. iii November 2016 SEARCH Final Report Phase I CRAS and Supplemental Testing of the Ocala Ranch Property, Marion County, Florida This page intentionally left blank. iv SEARCH November 2016 Phase I CRAS and Supplemental Testing of the Ocala Ranch Property, Marion County, Florida Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. v List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. vii List of Tables .................................................................................................................................... x Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 2: Project Location and Environment ............................................................................... 4 Modern Environment ............................................................................................................... 7 Geology and Geomorphology ................................................................................................... 8 Paleoenvironment .................................................................................................................. 10 Chapter 3: Historic Context ........................................................................................................... 11 Pre‐Columbian Context ........................................................................................................... 11 Post‐Contact History ............................................................................................................... 17 Historic Map and Aerial Photography Review ........................................................................ 26 Chapter 4: Previous Investigations ............................................................................................... 38 Florida Master Site File Review ............................................................................................... 38 Chapter 5: Research Design .......................................................................................................... 44 Cultural Resources Potential ................................................................................................... 44 Site Evaluation Criteria ............................................................................................................ 44 Phase I Survey Methods .......................................................................................................... 46 Supplemental Testing ............................................................................................................. 48 Chapter 6: Survey Results ............................................................................................................. 51 Archaeology Results ................................................................................................................ 51 Area A Results ......................................................................................................................... 51 Area B Results ......................................................................................................................... 55 Area C Results ......................................................................................................................... 57 Area D Results ......................................................................................................................... 58 Area E Results ......................................................................................................................... 62 Area F Results .......................................................................................................................... 62 Area G Results ......................................................................................................................... 77 Area H Results ......................................................................................................................... 90 Area I Results .......................................................................................................................... 92 Low Probability Areas Results ................................................................................................. 92 Discussion of Prehistoric Findings ........................................................................................... 94 Architectural Assessment ....................................................................................................... 95 Chapter 7: Conclusions and Recommendations ........................................................................... 96 Newly Recorded Sites ............................................................................................................. 96 Updated Resource Group 8MR3722 ....................................................................................... 98 References Cited ........................................................................................................................... 99 v November 2016 SEARCH Final Report Phase I CRAS and Supplemental Testing of the Ocala Ranch Property, Marion County, Florida Appendix A: Unanticipated Discoveries Statement Appendix B: Data Inventory Appendix C: FDHR Survey Log Appendix D: FMSF Site Forms vi SEARCH November 2016 Phase I CRAS and Supplemental Testing of the Ocala Ranch Property, Marion County, Florida Final Report LIST
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wilderness on the Edge: a History of Everglades National Park
    Wilderness on the Edge: A History of Everglades National Park Robert W Blythe Chicago, Illinois 2017 Prepared under the National Park Service/Organization of American Historians cooperative agreement Table of Contents List of Figures iii Preface xi Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations and Acronyms Used in Footnotes xv Chapter 1: The Everglades to the 1920s 1 Chapter 2: Early Conservation Efforts in the Everglades 40 Chapter 3: The Movement for a National Park in the Everglades 62 Chapter 4: The Long and Winding Road to Park Establishment 92 Chapter 5: First a Wildlife Refuge, Then a National Park 131 Chapter 6: Land Acquisition 150 Chapter 7: Developing the Park 176 Chapter 8: The Water Needs of a Wetland Park: From Establishment (1947) to Congress’s Water Guarantee (1970) 213 Chapter 9: Water Issues, 1970 to 1992: The Rise of Environmentalism and the Path to the Restudy of the C&SF Project 237 Chapter 10: Wilderness Values and Wilderness Designations 270 Chapter 11: Park Science 288 Chapter 12: Wildlife, Native Plants, and Endangered Species 309 Chapter 13: Marine Fisheries, Fisheries Management, and Florida Bay 353 Chapter 14: Control of Invasive Species and Native Pests 373 Chapter 15: Wildland Fire 398 Chapter 16: Hurricanes and Storms 416 Chapter 17: Archeological and Historic Resources 430 Chapter 18: Museum Collection and Library 449 Chapter 19: Relationships with Cultural Communities 466 Chapter 20: Interpretive and Educational Programs 492 Chapter 21: Resource and Visitor Protection 526 Chapter 22: Relationships with the Military
    [Show full text]
  • Late Mississippian Ceramic Production on St
    LATE MISSISSIPPIAN CERAMIC PRODUCTION ON ST. CATHERINES ISLAND, GEORGIA Anna M. Semon A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Vincas P. Steponaitis C. Margaret Scarry R. P. Stephen Davis Anna Agbe-Davis John Scarry © 2019 Anna M. Semon ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Anna M. Semon: Late Mississippian Ceramic Production on St. Catherines Island, Georgia (Under the direction of Vincas P. Steponaitis) This dissertation examines Late Mississippian pottery manufacturing on St. Catherines Island, Georgia. Data collected from five ceramic assemblages, three village and two mortuary sites, were used to characterize each ceramic assemblage and examine small-scale ceramic variations associated with learning and making pottery, which reflect pottery communities of practice. In addition, I examined pottery decorations to investigate social interactions at community and household levels. This dissertation is organized in six chapters. Chapter 1 provides the background, theoretical framework, and objectives of this research. Chapter 2 describes coastal Georgia’s culture history, with focus on the Mississippian period. Chapters 3 and 4 present the methods and results of this study. I use both ceramic typology and attribute analyses to explore ceramic variation. Chapter 3 provides details about the ceramic typology for each site. In addition, I examine the Mississippian surface treatments for each assemblage and identified ceramic changes between middle Irene (A.D. 1350–1450), late Irene (A.D. 1450–1580), and early Mission (A.D. 1580–1600) period.
    [Show full text]
  • A St. Johns II Pottery Assemblage from the Shields Site (8DU12) Vicki L
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2004 Measuring Tradition and Variation: A St. Johns II Pottery Assemblage from the Shields Site (8DU12) Vicki L. Rolland Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES MEASURING TRADITION AND VARIATION: A ST. JOHNS II POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE FROM THE SHIELDS SITE (8DU12) By VICKI L. ROLLAND A Thesis submitted to the Department of Anthropology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2004 The members of the committee approve the thesis of Vicki L. Rolland defended on December 18, 2003. _____________________________ Rochelle Marrinan Professor Directing Thesis _____________________________ Rebecca A. Saunders Committee Member _____________________________ Glen Doran Committee Member Approved: __________________________________ Dean Falk, Chair, Department of Anthropology The office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii To Jeff and Meaghan Rolland, and Jeff one more time for good measure iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are three women who have been my excellent teachers and my excellent friends. They have always freely shared their time and offered me encouragement. The following pages resonate with their ideas, their knowledge, and their desire to uncover and understand the process of pottery construction, continuity, and change. Thank you to Rebecca Saunders, Rochelle Marrinan, and Ann Cordell. I thank Keith Ashley for his curiosity, patience, and energy, all of which have often provided me with ample inspiration and determination. No one places the bar higher than Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher Materials for Journeys with Florida's Indians
    Teacher Materials for Journeys with Florida’s Indians • Teacher Quick Reference to the Timucua, Calusa, and Apalachee (p.2) • Language Arts Extension Activities by Sunshine State Standard (pp. 3-15) • Florida’s Early People Classroom Activities (pp. 16-19) Materials provided by Florida Author and Educational Consultant, Kelley Weitzel http://www.kelleyweitzel.com Teacher Quick Comparison of Florida’s Early Cultures: Timucua vs. Calusa vs. Apalachee LOCATION Timucua: SE Georgia, NE Florida, and Central Florida Calusa: SW Florida, near Fort Myers Apalachee: NW Florida, near the Tallahassee area FOOD RESOURCES Timucua: Land & water animals, shellfish, forest plants, some crops Calusa: Water animals, shellfish, & plants, some land resources, few crops Apalachee: Mostly land animals and crops, some water resources GOVERNMENT Timucua: Regional headchiefs ruled 30–40 villages. Headchiefs were not united into one government and often fought each other. Calusa: All villages were united under one Paramount Chief. This chief was strong enough to rule SW FL villages that were not Calusa. Apalachee: All villages were loosely united. During times of war and peace, they had different rulers. RELIGION Timucua: Held a deer ceremony to thank the sun for its bounty Calusa: Believed in three gods and that each person has three souls Apalachee: Played the ball game to honor the thunder god and bring rain for their crops. WHAT HAPPENED TO THEM? Timucua: Missionized. Killed by disease, warfare, & slavery. The last few were evacuated to Cuba in 1763. The culture disappeared. Calusa: Never missionized. Killed by disease & warfare. The culture disappeared in the early 1700’s. Apalachee: Missionized. Killed by disease, warfare, & slave raids.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brickhill Bluff Site, Cumberland Island, Georgia
    MODELING VARIABILITY IN PRE-COLUMBIAN WOODLAND HABITATION AND SOCIAL ORGANIZATION: THE BRICKHILL BLUFF SITE, CUMBERLAND ISLAND, GEORGIA by Stephen Andrew Wise A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Dorothy F. Schmidt College of Arts and Letters In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, FL August 2017 Copyright by Stephen Andrew Wise 2017 ii iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my advisor Dr. Arlene Fradkin for her continued encouragement and patience. This work would not have been possible without her persistence and guidance. I am especially indebted to Dr. Mike Russo, Archaeologist for the National Park Service, for his reassurance and help. I also would like to thank Valentina Martinez who taught me how to excavate features and the proper way to hold a trowel. Her comments and suggestions were invaluable to the organization and construction of this thesis. Thank you for being supportive of my goals. I am grateful to everyone whom I have had the pleasure to work with on this and other related projects. Whether in the field or in the lab, the members of my excavation team and the many supportive voices at Florida Atlantic University and the National Park Service have contributed to my growth as an archeologist and as a person. I would especially like to thank Dr. David Morgan, Dr. Michael Harris, Richard Vernon, Hank Kratt, Charlie Sproul, and John Cornelison who have guided my academics and career. They have served as mentors and shown me how to be a professional archaeologist and friend.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Survey of the RDA Mine Tract
    Cultural Resources Survey of the RDA Mine Tract Williamsburg County, South Carolina June 2017 15 June2017 SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF Larry James ARCHIVESO HISTORY Brockington and Associates 498 Wando Park Blvd, Ste 700 Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 Re: CR$ of RDA Mine Tract Williamsburg County, South Carolina SHPO Project No. 17-ADOO14 Dear Mr. James: Our office has received the documentation dated June 6, 2017 that you submitted as due diligence for the project referenced above, including the description of and plans for avoidance of site 3$WGOY85. This letter is for preliminary, informational purposes only and does not constitute consultation or agency coordination with our office as defined in 36 CFR $00: “Protection of Historic Properties” or by any state regulatory process. The recommendation stated below could change once the responsible federal and/or state agency initiates consultation with our office. The updated plans call for preservation in place of site 3$WG0185, which is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, through preservation in place, a 50-foot buffer around the site, and perimeter fencing during mining activities within 1000 feet of the site. Our office agrees that these measures are sufficient to protect the site. If the project were to require state permits or federal permits, licenses, funds, loans, grants, or assistance for development, we would recommend to the federal or state agency or agencies that the project will have no adverse effect on cultural resources. We do request, however, that our office be notified immediately if archaeological materials or human skeletal remains are encountered prior to or during construction on the project site.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Anthropological Society NEWSLETTER
    Florida Anthropological Society NEWSLETTER Number 197 David B. Burns, Editor February 2010 Next Board Meeting view the newly completed walk-in shell mound exhibit. Bus transportation to and from the reception is included in your The FAS board will meet on Saturday February 27, conference registration and will depart from the Harborside 2010 at 10 AM at the SEARCH office in Newberry. Chapter Event Center. Representatives are reminded to email their Chapter reports to Saturday, May 8: Papers and posters will be the Board before the meeting. presented morning and afternoon at Harborside Event Center. The deadline for abstracts and poster proposals is February 2010 FAS Annual Meeting 12, 2010. Vendors with books and other wares will be available at the event center. Lunch is on your own on Saturday and many small restaurants are nearby, or pick up a The 62nd annual FAS meeting will be held May 7-9 at the sandwich and stroll by the river. Harborside Event Center in Fort Myers hosted by The The FAS Annual Business Meeting and FAS New Southwest Florida Archaeological Society (SWFAS). Board Meeting will follow the paper sessions on Saturday. Accommodations Saturday night’s banquet features speaker Dr. Jerald Accommodations for FAS 2010 will be at the new Hotel T. Milanich, Curator Emeritus in Archaeology at the Florida Indigo, just a block from the Harborside Event Center and a Museum of Natural History. Please sign up for the banquet short walk to the Caloosahatchee River. The Hotel Indigo is a when you register by April 7, 2010. Dr. Milanich will speak 67-room boutique hotel that opened in 2009, with a bar, on Adventures in the Everglades, A.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Historical Quarterly (ISSN 0015-4113) Is Published by the Florida Historical Society, University of South Florida, 4202 E
    COVER Black Bahamian community of Coconut Grove, late nineteenth century. This is the entire black community in front of Ralph Munroe’s boathouse. Photograph courtesy Ralph Middleton Munroe Collection, Historical Association of Southern Florida, Miami, Florida. The Historical Volume LXX, Number 4 April 1992 The Florida Historical Quarterly (ISSN 0015-4113) is published by the Florida Historical Society, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33620, and is printed by E. O. Painter Printing Co., DeLeon Springs, FL. Second-class postage paid at Tampa, FL, and at additional mailing office. POST- MASTER: Send address changes to the Florida Historical Society, P. O. Box 290197, Tampa, FL 33687. Copyright 1992 by the Florida Historical Society, Tampa, Florida. THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL QUARTERLY Samuel Proctor, Editor Mark I. Greenberg, Editorial Assistant EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD David R. Colburn University of Florida Herbert J. Doherty University of Florida Michael V. Gannon University of Florida John K. Mahon University of Florida (Emeritus) Joe M. Richardson Florida State University Jerrell H. Shofner University of Central Florida Charlton W. Tebeau University of Miami (Emeritus) Correspondence concerning contributions, books for review, and all editorial matters should be addressed to the Editor, Florida Historical Quarterly, Box 14045, University Station, Gainesville, Florida 32604-2045. The Quarterly is interested in articles and documents pertaining to the history of Florida. Sources, style, footnote form, original- ity of material and interpretation, clarity of thought, and in- terest of readers are considered. All copy, including footnotes, should be double-spaced. Footnotes are to be numbered con- secutively in the text and assembled at the end of the article.
    [Show full text]
  • MOU Between Florida Forest Service, USFWS &
    NPS Agreement No. H5023-02- 0515 Memorandum of Understanding /IBetween the United States Department of Interior (National Park Se~ice,I Southeast Region and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Southeast Region) I and the Florida Department Iof Agriculture and Consumer Services (Di'fision of Forestry) I ARTICLE I - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES This Memorandum ofunderstandinJ is hereby entered into this October 30,2002 by and between the Florida Division of Forestry, a state agency (the ST ATE), and the National Park Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, agencies of the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOl), (the SERVICE), tovering a reciprocal fire protection agreement . I The SERVICE is mandated to protect and perpetuate natural and cultura.l resources found within national parks and wildlife refuges, and is responsible for conducting fire management activities in federal patks and wildlife refuges in Florida which are adjacent I to areas protected by the STATE; and The STATE is responsible for conducting fire management activities on state owned and privately owned lands in Florida which are adjacent to and interspersed with National Park and National Wildlife Refuge llands; and It is to the mutual advantage ofbO~h the STATE and the SERVICE to coordinate their efforts in the prevention, detectiori, suppression,' and investigation of wildfires in and adjacent to their areas of responsibility. I Each agency shall render mutual I assistance in law enforcement activities and the gathering of evidence and in actual court prosecutions to the fullest extent allowable by o law and policy. I , , ARTICLE II -AUTHORITY -t"O.
    [Show full text]
  • TO DOWNLOAD the MAP and LIST of Go365 BEACON LOCATIONS
    Seaton Creek U A Q R DE P J K S I X W O M V G H B L C F Y T N 904.374.1107 Humana Go365® Beacon Locations (25) – Jacksonville [email protected] Alphabetical order by park name. See attached list. 9953 Heckscher Dr, Jacksonville FL 32226 Park Name Street Address "Check In" Location Picture "Check in" at the trail map kiosk at the trailhead across the street Fort George Island 11241 Fort George Rd E, J from the Ribault Club (near the Cultural State Park Jacksonville, FL 32226 Segway Rental overflow parking area) Huguenot Memorial 10980 Heckscher Drive, K "Check in" at the Nature Center Park Jacksonville, FL 32226 "Check in" at the Jacksonville- Jacksonville-Baldwin Baldwin Station, 850 Center Baldwin Rail-Trail kiosk to the L Rail Trail (Baldwin Street North, Jacksonville, FL east of the train station end) 32234 restrooms "Check in" at the Jacksonville- Jacksonville-Baldwin 1800 Imeson Rd, Jacksonville, Baldwin Rail Trail map in the Timucuan Parks Foundation - BEACON LOCATIONS as of 09/2018 M Rail Trail (Imeson Road FL 32220 kiosk on the paved trail west of end) the parking lot Park Name Street Address "Check In" Location Picture "Check in" at the Julington- Betz-Tiger Point 13990 Pumpkin Hill Road, "Check in" at the large pavilion at Julington-Durbin 13130 Bartram Park Blvd A N Durbin Creek Preserve trail sign in Preserve Jacksonville, FL 32226 the main parking area Creek Preserve Jacksonville, FL the kiosk west of the parking lot "Check in" at the Kathryn Abbey "Check in" at the Jacksonville Camp Milton Historic 1175 Halsema Road
    [Show full text]
  • The Timucua Indians of Sixteenth Century Florida
    Florida Historical Quarterly Volume 18 Number 3 Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol 18, Article 4 Issue 3 1939 The Timucua Indians of Sixteenth Century Florida W. W. Ehrmann Part of the American Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Article is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Historical Quarterly by an authorized editor of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Ehrmann, W. W. (1939) "The Timucua Indians of Sixteenth Century Florida," Florida Historical Quarterly: Vol. 18 : No. 3 , Article 4. Available at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq/vol18/iss3/4 Ehrmann: The Timucua Indians of Sixteenth Century Florida THE TIMUCUA INDIANS OF SIXTEENTH CENTURY FLORIDA By W. W. EHRMANN The University of Florida (Bibliographical note. The most important sources on the Indians of northern Florida* at the time of the first European contacts are the writings of the Frenchmen Ribault and Laudon- niere, and the Franciscan monk Pareja who lived as a mis- sionary among them. A very graphic record of the life of the Timucua comes to us in the sketches of Le Moyne, who accom- panied Laudonniere. The best summaries of the original sources are those of Swanton and, to a less extent, Brinton. See full bibliography, post.) P HYSICAL E NVIRONMENT When first visited by the Spanish explorers in the early sixteenth century, northern Florida was inhabited by the Timucua family of Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher's Guide to Florida's
    Teacher’s Guide to Florida’s Native People Inquiry Boxes: Museum on the move FLORIDA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SW 34th Street & Hull Road on the University of Florida campus, Gainesville, FL Monday – Saturday 10 a.m. – 5 p.m. • Sunday & Holidays 1 p.m. – 5 p.m. (352) 846-2000 ext. 214 • www.flmnh.ufl.edu 2 www.flmnh.ufl.edu © 2002 Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, Florida This Teacher’s Guide is made possible by a grant from the Department of State, Division of Historical Resources, Historical Museums Grants-in-Aid Program Acknowledgments This guide was produced by the Florida Museum of Natural History under the direction of Marilyn M. Roberts, Education Programs Coordinator Graphic Designer . .Pat Klaus Writer and Copy Editor . .Jeanne Chamberlin Writer and Copy Editor . .Darcie MacMahon Copy Editor . .Dr. Betty Dunckel Camp Museum Artist . .Merald Clark Museum Photographers . .Jeff Gage, Tammy Johnson Seminole Photographers . .Ernie Tiger, Elrod Bowers Seminole Graphic Designer . .Melissa Sherman Canoe Race Illustration . .Andrew Works Cover Illustration . .Allen Cheuvront Florida Heritage Education Program, Department of State, Division of Historical Resources In addition, I would like to thank the following people at FLMHH for their contributions to the Museum on the Move: Inquiry Boxes program: Dr. Douglas S. Jones, FLMNH Director Division of Exhibits and Public Programs Kurt Auffenberg • Jeannette Carlisle • Brian Chamberlain Ron Chesser • Lorraine Duerden • Susan Jarzen Dale Johnson • Tom Kyne • Robert Leavy Dr. Bruce J. MacFadden • John Patterson • Erika Simons • Charlene Smith FLMNH Volunteers and Docents Division of Collections and Research Sarah Brix • Richard Franz • Dr. David M.
    [Show full text]