DOCSLIB.ORG

115 SUPREME COURT REPORTER S 779U.S. TERM LIMITS, INC., Et Al., Petitioners, V. Ray THORNTON Et Al. Winston BRYANT, Attorney

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
115 SUPREME COURT REPORTER S 779U.S. TERM LIMITS, INC., Et Al., Petitioners, V. Ray THORNTON Et Al. Winston BRYANT, Attorney 1842 115 SUPREME COURT REPORTER 514 U.S. 779 514 U.S. 779, 131 L.Ed.2d 881 people of the United States. U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 1, §§ 2, cl. 2, 3, cl. 3. S 779U.S. TERM LIMITS, INC., et al., Petitioners, 2. United States O7.1 v. With respect to Congress, framers of the Ray THORNTON et al. Constitution intended the Constitution to es- tablish fixed qualifications in the sense that Winston BRYANT, Attorney General they may not be supplemented by Congress. of Arkansas, Petitioner, U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 1, §§ 2, cl. 2, 3, cl. 3. v. 3. States O4.16(2) Bobbie E. HILL et al. Powers retained by the states under the Nos. 93–1456, 93–1828. Tenth Amendment proceed, not from the Argued Nov. 29, 1994. people of America, but from the people of the Decided May 22, 1995. several states and they remain, after adop- tion of the Constitution, what they were be- fore, except so far as they may be abridged Action was brought challenging amend- by that instrument. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. ment to the Arkansas Constitution which 10. precluded persons who had served certain number of terms in the United States Con- 4. States O4 gress from having their names placed on the States retain a significant measure of ballot for election to Congress. The Circuit sovereign authority but they do so only to Court found that the provision violated the the extent that the Constitution has not di- United States Constitution. The Arkansas vested them of their original powers and Supreme Court affirmed, 316 Ark. 251, 872 transferred those powers to the federal gov- S.W.2d 349. On certiorari, the Supreme ernment. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 10. Court, Justice Stevens, held that: (1) states may not impose qualifications for offices of 5. States O4.4(3) the United States representative or United United States O7.1 States senator in addition to those set forth by the Constitution; (2) power to set addi- Power to add qualifications for the of- tional qualifications was not reserved to the fices of congressman and senator is not part states by the Tenth Amendment; and (3) of the original powers of sovereignty which state provision is unconstitutional when it has the Tenth Amendment reserved to the likely effect of handicapping a class of candi- states. U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 1, §§ 2, cl. 2, 3, dates and has the sole purpose of creating cl. 3; Amend. 10. additional qualifications indirectly. 6. States O4.4(1) Affirmed. States can exercise no powers whatsoev- Justice Kennedy filed a concurring opin- er which exclusively spring out of the exis- ion. tence of the national government which the Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opin- Constitution does not delegate to them, and ion in which Chief Justice Rehnquist, Justice no state can say that it has reserved what it O’Connor, and Justice Scalia joined. never possessed. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 10. 7. Taxation O9 1. United States O7.1 Constitution’s silence on the subject of Allowing individual states to adopt their state power to tax corporations chartered by own qualifications for congressional service Congress does not imply that the states have would be inconsistent with framers’ vision of reserved power to tax such federal instru- uniform national legislature representing the mentalities. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 10. 514 U.S. 779 U.S. TERM LIMITS, INC. v. THORNTON 1843 Cite as 115 S.Ct. 1842 (1995) 8. United States O7.1 15. States O18.71 In the national government, representa- United States O7.1, 11 tives owe primary allegiance, not to the peo- State constitutional provision which pre- ple of a state, but to the people of the nation. cluded person’s name from appearing on bal- lot for election to Congress if the person had 9. United States 7.1 O served three or more terms as a member of Even if states possessed as part of their the House of Representatives or two or more original powers some control over congres- terms as a member of the United States sional qualifications, the qualifications clauses Senate was not a mere regulation of the were intended to preclude states from exer- times, places, and manner of holding elec- cising any such power and to fix as exclusive tions but, rather, was an impermissible quali- the qualifications set forth in the Constitu- fication for office. U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 1, tion. U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 1, §§ 2, cl. 2, 3, cl. §§ 2, cl. 2, 3, cl. 3, 4, cl. 1. 3. 16. United States O7.1 10. States O18.71 State provision is unconstitutional when United States O7.1 it has a likely effect of handicapping a class State-imposed restrictions on qualifica- of candidates for Congress and has the sole tions for Congress violate the idea that the purpose of creating additional qualifications right to choose representatives belongs, not indirectly. U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 1, §§ 2, cl. to the states, but to the people. U.S.C.A. 2, 3, cl. 3. Const. Art. 1, §§ 2, cl. 2, 3, cl. 3. Syllabus * 11. United States O7.1 Respondent Hill filed this suit in Arkan- Congress of the United States is not a sas state court challenging the constitutional- confederation of nations in which separate ity of § 3 of Amendment 73 to the Arkansas sovereigns are represented by appointed del- Constitution, which prohibits the name of an egates but is instead a body composed of otherwise-eligible candidate for Congress representatives of the people. from appearing on the general election ballot if that candidate has already served three 12. United States O1 terms in the House of Representatives or Ours is a government of the people, by two terms in the Senate. The trial court the people, for the people. held that § 3 violated Article I of the Federal Constitution, and the Arkansas Supreme 13. United States O7.1 Court affirmed. A plurality of the latter Constitutionality of state law setting court concluded that the States have no au- forth qualifications for Congress would not thority ‘‘to change, add to, or diminish’’ the depend on the method of its adoption, and age, citizenship, and residency requirements the people of the state, in enacting a mea- for congressional service enumerated in the sure, have no more power than does the state Qualifications Clauses, U.S. Const., Art. I, legislature to supplement the qualifications § 2, cl. 2, and Art. I, § 3, cl. 3, and rejected for service in Congress. U.S.C.A. Const. the argument that Amendment 73 is constitu- Art. 1, §§ 2, cl. 2, 3, cl. 3. tional because it is formulated as a ballot access restriction rather than an outright 14. Constitutional Law O38 disqualification of congressional incumbents. Constitution nullifies sophisticated as Held: Section 3 of Amendment 73 to the well as simple-minded modes of infringing on Arkansas Constitution violates the Federal constitutional protections. Constitution. Pp. 1847–1871. * The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of See United States v. Detroit Lumber Co., 200 U.S. the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 287, 50 L.Ed. 499. of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. 1844 115 SUPREME COURT REPORTER 514 U.S. 779 (a) The power granted to each House of sentatives would result in a patchwork that Congress to judge the ‘‘Qualifications of its would be inconsistent with the Framers’ vi- own Members,’’ Art. I, § 5, cl. 1, does not sion of a uniform National Legislature repre- include the power to alter or add to the senting the people of the United States. The qualifications set forth in the Constitution’s fact that, immediately after the adoption of text. Powell v. McCormack, 395 U.S. 486, the Constitution, many States imposed term 540, 89 S.Ct. 1944, 1973, 23 L.Ed.2d 491. limits and other qualifications on state offi- After examining Powell ’s analysis of the cers, while only one State imposed such a Qualifications Clauses history and text, id., at qualification on Members of Congress, pro- 518–548, 89 S.Ct., at 1962–1978, and its artic- vides further persuasive evidence of a gener- ulation of the ‘‘basic principles of our demo- al understanding that the qualifications in the cratic system,’’ id., at 548, 89 S.Ct., at 1978, Constitution were unalterable by the States. this Court reaffirms that the constitutional Pp. 1852–1866. qualifications for congressional service are (c) A state congressional term limits ‘‘fixed,’’ at least in the sense that they may not be supplemented by Congress. Pp. measure is unconstitutional when it has the 1847–1852. likely effect of handicapping a class of candi- dates and has the sole purpose of creating (b) So too, the Constitution prohibits additional qualifications indirectly. The States from imposing congressional qualifica- Court rejects petitioners’ argument that tions additional to those specifically enumer- Amendment 73 is valid because it merely ated in its text. Petitioners’ argument that precludes certain congressional candidates States possess control over qualifications as from being certified and having their names part of the original powers reserved to them appear on the ballot, and allows them to run by the Tenth Amendment is rejected for two reasons. First, the power to add qualifica- as write-in candidates and serve if elected. tions is not within the States’ pre-Tenth Even if petitioners’ narrow understanding of Amendment ‘‘original powers,’’ but is a new qualifications is correct, Amendment 73 must right arising from the Constitution itself, and fall because it is an indirect attempt to evade the Qualifications Clauses’ requirements and thus is S 780not reserved.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The David and Barbara Pryor Center for Arkansas Oral and Visual History
    The David and Barbara Pryor Center for Arkansas Oral and Visual History University of Arkansas 1 East Center Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-6829 Arkansas Memories Project Ray Thornton Interviewed by Scott Lunsford September 20, 2011 Little Rock, Arkansas Copyright 2014 Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas. All rights reserved. Objective Oral history is a collection of an individual's memories and opinions. As such, it is subject to the innate fallibility of memory and is susceptible to inaccuracy. All researchers using these interviews should be aware of this reality and are encouraged to seek corroborating documentation when using any oral history interview. The Pryor Center's objective is to collect audio and video recordings of interviews along with scanned images of family photographs and documents. These donated materials are carefully preserved, catalogued, and deposited in the Special Collections Department, University of Arkansas Libraries, Fayetteville. The transcripts, audio files, video highlight clips, and photographs are made available on the Pryor Center website at http://pryorcenter.uark.edu. The Pryor Center recommends that researchers utilize the audio recordings and highlight clips, in addition to the transcripts, to enhance their connection with the interviewee. Transcript Methodology The Pryor Center recognizes that we cannot reproduce the spoken word in a written document; however, we strive to produce a transcript that represents the characteristics and unique qualities of the interviewee's speech pattern, style of speech, regional dialect, and personality. For the first twenty minutes of the interview, we attempt to transcribe verbatim all words and utterances that are spoken, such as uhs and ahs, false starts, and repetitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Betty Clark Dickey Oral History
    Arkansas Supreme Court Project Arkansas Supreme Court Historical Society Interview With Betty C. Dickey Little Rock, Arkansas February 20, 2018 Interviewer: Ernest Dumas Ernest Dumas: I am Ernie Dumas and I am interviewing Judge Betty C. Dickey. This interview is being held at her home at 132 Falata Circle, Little Rock, Arkansas, in Pulaski County on February 20, 2018. The audio recording of this interview will be donated to the David and Barbara Pryor Center for Oral and Visual Arkansas History at the University of Arkansas and the Arkansas Supreme Court Historical Society. The recording transcript and any other related materials will be deposited and preserved forever in the Special Collections Department, University of Arkansas Libraries, Fayetteville. And the copyright will belong to the University of Arkansas and the Arkansas Supreme Court Historical Society. Judge Dickey, please state your full name and spell your name and indicate that you are willing to give the Pryor Center and the Supreme Court Historical Society permission to make the transcript available to others? Betty Dickey: My name is Betty Clark Dickey and, yes, I am willing. ED: OK. Judge, let’s start off at the beginning. Your birth date and your full name as it was at birth. BD: My birth date was February 23, 1940. I was born in Black Rock [Lawrence County]. ED: Your father and your mother. BD: My full name was Betty Clark. No middle name. My father’s name was Millard Morris Clark of Black Rock. My mother was Myrtle Norris Clark, also of Black Rock. ED: Black Rock is in Lawrence County.
    [Show full text]
  • Reddie Report Magazine for Alumni and Friends of Henderson State University
    Reddie Report Magazine for Alumni and Friends of Henderson State University Henderson State University’s 15th President Dr. Charles Welch Spring 2009 Letter from the President Alumni and Friends, There are amazing things happening on the Henderson campus, and I welcome every opportunity to share the good news with you. Our faculty, staff and students have been actively participating in planning and implementing changes that will make Henderson more progressive and efficient in the future. I am committed to building an even stronger university with an environment of inclusiveness and collaboration. Enhancing our image and increasing enrollment are top priorities. We are developing and PR / Steve Fellers renewing partnerships with our community, public schools, community colleges, other universities and the businesses that employ our graduates. This improved connectivity will boost Henderson’s enrollment and positively impact the citizens in our region. We are celebrating the completion of two fantastic new additions to our beautiful campus, the Nursing Building and the Charles D. Dunn Student Recreation Center. We have also embarked on the creation of a new campus master plan which will assist in the wise use of our resources as we look to the future. We are also strategically planning effective ways to enhance our image in order to more effectively communicate what an exciting and vibrant university we have. Please be looking for a new and improved website in the near future! It is an exciting experience for me to meet alumni, former faculty, staff and friends of the university. Mandy, Wheatley, Emma and I feel blessed to be a part of the Henderson family, and we look forward to celebrating the exciting future of our university with each of you.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Members of Congress Organization” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 8, folder “Congress - Former Members of Congress Organization” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 8 of The John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE w;-.;\TE. HOUSE 'N A 5 H I •'i G T 0 N r.tay 22, 19 75 RECEPTIO~J FOR FORi',lER HE~lBERS OF COJ.\TGRESS T~ursday, May 22, 1975 5:00-6:00 p.m. (60 minutes) The State Floor Fo::om: ~lax L. Friedersdorf AJ1.6 , I. PURPOSE To host a reception in honor of approximately 144 forw.er .Hembers of Congress. II. BACKGROUND, PARTICIPfu~TS ?~D PRESS PLaN A. Background: 1. A ~'ihi te House reception attended by the President will highlight the Fifth Annual Alumni Days' activities of Former Members of Congress. 2. The Nhite House event will be the last affair of the blo day event, also featuring reunions and receptions in the House and Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas Supreme Court Project Arkansas Supreme Court Historical Society Interview with Ray Thornton Little Rock, Arkansas September 20, 2011
    This oral history with former Justice Ray Thornton was conducted in two parts, on September 20, 2011, by Scott Lunsford of the David and Barbara Pryor Center for Oral and Visual History at the University of Arkansas and on February 21, 2013, by Ernest Dumas. The second interview goes into more detail on some aspects of his political career, particularly the Supreme Court. The Dumas interview follows the end of the Lunsford interview. Arkansas Supreme Court Project Arkansas Supreme Court Historical Society Interview with Ray Thornton Little Rock, Arkansas September 20, 2011 Interviewer: Scott Lunsford Scott Lunsford: Today’s date is September 20 and the year is 2011 and we’re in Little Rock at 1 Gay Place. I’m sorry, I don’t know the name of the person whose residence we are at, but we decided we wanted kind of a quiet, withdrawn place to do this interview and Julie Baldridge, your loyal helper… Ray Thornton: She and I have worked together for many years and she is really an extraordinary person. And on this day she has just been named the interim director of the Arkansas Scholarship Lottery Commission staff in Little Rock. SL: That’s a great honor. RT: Well, it is for her and she deserves it. SL: Well, we’re very grateful for her help in finding this place and getting us together. Let me say first that it is a great honor to be sitting across from you and I’ve looked forward to this for some time. Now, let me give you a brief description of what we’re doing here.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Known Descendants of This Is Not the Typical AAFA Genealogy. These
    1 Known Descendants of WILLIAM HENRY ALFORD This is not the typical AAFA genealogy. These descendants of Job Alford are from a file created by John A. Rogers, AAFA #0544 who is the AAFA authority on Job Descendants. John has researched these folks to a greater degree that AAFA had researched most other Alfords. John also includes more information in his report than is found in a typical AAFA genealogy. Nevertheless it is a work in progress and probably is not complete and with some error. Generations 5-6 have been removed to protect the privacy of most of the living. The work contains many names but the only ones listed in the index are those listed within the registry system. 1. William Henry Alford #331 b. 1811, Wake County, North Carolina, (son of Job Alford #325 and Sarah Ann Turner? #326) m. Sarah Elizabeth "Betsy" Stilwell #1099, b. 1809, North Carolina, (daughter of Shadrack Stilwell #9156 and _____ Unknown #9157) d. ABT. 1875, Harris County, Georgia, buried: ABT. 1875, Harris County, Georgia. William died ABT. 1867, Georgia, buried: ABT. 1867, Unknown. William Henry Alford was Job's 5th son. He was born in 1811 in Wake County, North Carolina, shortly before the family left for South Carolina and then Georgia. Most people called him "Bill." He came to Jones County, Georgia, as a young child, with his family around 1817. In 1823, as a preteen, he moved with his parents to the Redbone District (555) of Upson County, Georgia, northeast of Thomaston, where he lived until 1828, when the family moved to the Black Ankle District (494), southeast of Thomaston.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download The
    BASKETBALL REVIEW 2021 SPORTS COOK OF THE WEEK 2021 BASKETBALL HARDY PLANNING SEASON IN REVIEW LOTS OF TRAVEL Championship, playoff runs — INSIDE Tommie Hardy — Page 1B Established 1881 — Oldest Business Institution in Neshoba County Philadelphia, Mississippi Wednesday, March 24, 2021 140th Year No. 12 **$1.00 NEW CASES CONTINUE TO DROP State surpasses 1M vaccinations By SCOTT HAWKINS county the recipients reside. to https://msdh.ms.gov/c19appo figures were available. As of last Friday, Pearl River meeting spaces and other Resort [email protected] Vaccinations are currently intment#local to check avail- The Mississippi Band of Resort moved to Phase 2 of their venues; being administered in Neshoba ability. Choctaw Indians reported four reopening that included increas- • Placing all slot machines A million COVID-19 vacci- County at the Coliseum, 12000 On Tuesday, Neshoba Coun- new COVID-19 cases in the ing capacity on the casino gam- and electronic table games back nations had been administered Mississippi 15 north, Philadel- ty recorded 25 new confirmed past week for a total of 1,831 ing floors from 50% to 75% and into service; as of Monday, Gov. Tate phia, Tuesday through Friday cases of COVID-19 over the positive cases, up from 1,827 in easing smoking restrictions. • Resumption of full service Reeves announced, and 7,066 by appointment at covidvac- past week for a total of 3,933 last week’s report. The decision to move into at the Spa at Silver Star. were in Neshoba County, cine.umc.edu or by calling 1- cases up from 3,908 cases the The Tribe reported one new phase 2 came after consultation Mississippi’s total number of according to the Mississippi 877-978-6453.
    [Show full text]
  • Some of the Descendants of John Alford Ca1801 North Carolina Alford American Family Association Computer Designation JOH801NC Revised May 2013
    Some of the Descendants of John Alford ca1801 North Carolina Alford American Family Association computer designation JOH801NC Revised May 2013 Generation One 1. John1 Alford #1, born Betw. 1790-1800 in North Carolina, died Betw. 1833-1840 in Pickens Co. Alabama. He married John's Wife's Name Unknown. #2, born betw.1790 - 1800 in North Carolina, died betw.1833 - 1840 in Pickens Co. Alabama. Burial place is unknown. -Aunt Manza Tingle of Neshoba Co. Mississippi, daughter of John Madison Alford, said his brothers were George, Julius, and Duke; said their father was named John (but called Jack, as was son John Madison); and said the children were orphaned and parceled out to relatives. [Letters dated 1967 and 1983 from the late Herman Alford AAFA member #68 (grandson of John Madison) who thought the original John had lived near Carrollton in Pickens County, Alabama.] - The eldest brother George Washington Alford died intestate Sept. 19, 1878 in Noxubee Co. Mississippi apparently having never married. His probate (Chancery Case 803) provides the only legal evidence connecting the brothers and reveals sisters Adeline and Frances. A further petition in 1885 (Chancery Case 1160) by John Madison Alford, Julius C. Alford, and Frances Alexander located their brother Julius C. in Hempstead Co. Arkansas. That suit plus CSA pension application 2881 for Julius C. Alford and the widow’s pension application 3771 (both in Winn Parish, Louisiana) assured us that we had the correct Julius C. - Now Y-DNA test results from one descendant of Julius C., one descendant of Marmaduke, and five descendants of John Madison (including 2 generations) confirm our research.
    [Show full text]
  • The Micromanagement Myth and Mission Command: Making the Case for Oversight of Military Operations by Christopher J
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 33 The Micromanagement Myth and Mission Command: Making the Case for Oversight of Military Operations by Christopher J. Lamb Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, and Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the unified combatant commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: General William Westmoreland luncheon meeting with President Lyndon B. Johnson, The White House, April 6, 1968 (Yoichi Okamoto/ Courtesy LBJ Presidential Library/C9391-17A) The Micromanagement Myth and Mission Command The Micromanagement Myth and Mission Command: Making the Case for Oversight of Military Operations By Christopher J. Lamb Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 33 Series Editor: Thomas F. Lynch III National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. August 2020 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the State Department, Defense Department, or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of the School of Law at UALR
    University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review Volume 8 Issue 4 Article 1 1985 A Short History of the School of Law at UALR Lawrence H. Averill Jr. University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview Part of the Legal Education Commons Recommended Citation Lawrence H. Averill Jr., A Short History of the School of Law at UALR, 8 U. ARK. LITTLE ROCK L. REV. 619 (1986). Available at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview/vol8/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review by an authorized editor of Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT LITTLE ROCK LAW JOURNAL VOLUME 8 1985-86 NUMBER 4 A SHORT HISTORY OF THE SCHOOL OF LAW AT UALR Lawrence H. Averill, Jr.* I. INTRODUCTION The Law School at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock has both a short and a long history. In its current status, it is but ten years old. As a part of the University system for twenty years, it has barely passed adolescence. But as an institution of legal education, it can trace with pride its roots back to the previous century as the successor to the Arkansas Law School. Under all these circumstances, the Law School has served its constituency well. It is appropriate that a short history of this legal institution be written.1 Legal education as an intellectual and academic endeavor is not very old in this country.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenville, MS 38702-1873 with Your Continued Service to Those in Need, Especially the Children
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF JUNIOR AUXILIARIES, INC. 845 South Main Street Greenville, Mississippi 38701 Mailing Address: Post Office Box 1873 Greenville, Mississippi 38702-1873 Telephone: (662) 332-3000 Facsimile: (662) 332-3076 E-Mail: [email protected] Web site: www.najanet.org Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/NAJAinc Follow us on Twitter: najainc Pinterest: http://pinterest.com/najainc/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/National-Association-Junior-Auxiliaries-Inc-4502392 The Junior Auxiliary membership list provided in this Bulletin is for the use of the Junior Auxiliary only and cannot be used for promotion of any activity unrelated to the Junior Auxiliary. “The Junior Auxiliary membership list shall not be made available for commercial purposes or for the purpose of solicitation.” Association Standing Rules I. Association. C. Fund Raising and Contributions. Junior Auxiliary Prayer Send us, O God, as Thy messengers to the hearts without a home, to lives without love, to the crowds without a guide. Send us to the children whom none have blessed, to the famished whom none have visited, to the fallen whom none have lifted, to the bereaved whom none have comforted. Kindle Thy flame on the altars of our hearts, that others may be warmed thereby; cause Thy light to shine in our souls, that others may see the way; keep our sympathies and insight ready, our wills keen, our hands quick to help others in their need. Grant us clear vision, true judgment, with great daring as we seek to right the wrong; and so endow us with cheer- ful love that we may minister to the suffering and forlorn even as Thou wouldst.
    [Show full text]
  • Campaign - 1974 (2)” of the Robert T
    The original documents are located in Box 24, folder “Campaign - 1974 (2)” of the Robert T. Hartmann Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 24 of the Robert T. Hartmann Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON Mr. Hartmann: Here is another copy of the material Gwen gave you on the results of the 1974 elections. nm (Do you remember her giving you two copies of this information yesterday?) THE WHITE HOUSE WAStilNGTON Mr. Hartmann: I understand Mrs. Anderson has already delivered to you the information you asked for in response to attached memo from the President. Neta Dec. 4 THE WHITE HOUSE WASlotlNGTON Dec. 2, 1974 - 11:35 a.m. Spoke with RTH - he said an updated copy of information in the c.Q. would be all right. Gave this info. to Susan H. She said they would get a copy over to us just as soon as they received all the additional information.
    [Show full text]