DOCSLIB.ORG

206, 224, PR2 Summary of Responses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
206, 224, PR2 Summary of Responses Consultation on possible changes to routes 206, 224 and PR2 Summary of responses September 2011 Contents Section Page 1 Introduction 3 2 The consultation 3 3 Responses from members of the public 5 4 Responses from statutory bodies and other 10 stakeholders Appendices A Copy of the consultation letter 13 B St Raphael’s Estate letter drop 17 C List of stakeholders consulted 18 2 1. Introduction The bus network is under regular review. Services in and around Park Royal and Wembley have been reviewed and a number of changes are proposed. • Route 206 would be diverted at Brent Park to Wembley Park and The Paddocks. • Route 224 would be diverted at Harlesden Station to Brentfield Road and the St Raphael’s Estate. • Route PR2 would be withdrawn. These proposals were designed to support continued provision of a comprehensive transport network, taking account of current usage and plans for development in the area. 2. The consultation 2.1 About the consultation: Stakeholder and public consultation on the proposals took place between 11 July and 19 August 2011. The key benefits of the proposals are: • More frequent service for many users with higher capacity in and around Wembley Park, the St Raphael’s Estate and Brentfield Road. • A more direct link between St Raphael’s and central Park Royal. • Introducing new Sunday services. • Better links to other modes of transport. Some direct links in the current network would no longer be provided. TfL asked the following questions: • What modes of transport do you use? • If you use buses, what are the main reasons for using them? • Please let us know what bus routes you take and how often? • Do you support the proposed changes to route PR2? • Do you support the proposed changes to route 206? • Do you support the proposed changed to route 224? • Do you think you would use public transport more or less if the changes went ahead? • Please let us know any further comments or suggestions you may have regarding these proposals. 3 2.2 Who we consulted The public consultation was intended to seek the views of people who lived near to the proposed route, current users of the service and potential users. We also consulted stakeholders including the London Boroughs of Brent, Ealing and Harrow, traffic police, London TravelWatch, Members of Parliament, Assembly Members and local interest groups. A list of the stakeholders we consulted is shown in Appendix C and a summary of their responses is in section 4. 2.3 Consultation material, distribution and publicity Website Content from the leaflet was displayed on the TfL website, along with an online form allowing users to respond to the questions and submit additional comments. Bus Stops The consultation was advertised at bus stops along the routes. Press Advertisements were published in the local press Letter A letter was distributed to addresses in the St Raphael’s Estate. People could respond by letter, telephone, textphone, email or web. Braille, audio and large font versions of the consultation material were available, as was a translation service to other languages. 4 3. Responses from members of the public We asked seven consultation questions and invited respondents to add further comments. There were 573 public responses to the consultation, not all respondents chose to answer all of the questions. 19 responded by post, 548 responded online, four responded via email, and two responded via the TfL Call Centre. Responses are summarised below. 3.1 Public consultation results Q1. What modes of transport do you use? 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Bus Train Tube Cycle Walk Car Q2. If you use buses, what are the main reasons for using them? 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Going to Shopping Social Medical Connect to other work/school/other appointments transport modes education 5 Q3. Please let us know what bus routes you take and how often? 200 180 160 140 120 Daily 100 Weekly 80 Monthly 60 Never 40 20 0 PR2 206 223 204 Q4 – 6. Do you support the proposed changes to route PR2/206/224? 450 400 350 300 250 Yes 200 No Does Not Affect Me 150 100 50 0 PR2 206 224 6 Q7 Do you think you would use public transport more or less if the changes went ahead? 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 More Less No Change Reasons for supporting the scheme: Reasons given for supporting the change can be seen in the table below: Reason Total Service will provide better access for users of the Swaminarayan Temple 24 Having two buses running on Sundays and bank holidays will be beneficial 7 Proposals take into account passenger safety 5 Changes will improve the link between Harlesden Station and Brentfield Road 4 Good that there is another route around Wembley 3 Routes should not serve St Raphael’s Estate 2 7 Reasons for opposing the scheme: Reasons given for opposing the change can be seen in the table below: Reason Total Routes should serve St Raphael’s Estate 22 PR2 is the only direct link to Central Middlesex Hospital 18 Proposals will result in an increase in fares 15 Will be difficult for the elderly to get around 10 PR2 should run 7 days a week 9 Hillside will be underserved if PR2 is removed 9 Shouldn’t remove any links through Willesden Junction Station 7 Changes are not good for the community 7 Longer journeys for the community 7 206 is a direct link to IKEA 6 Accessibility to the temple will be reduced 3 Routes serve several train/tube stations 2 Employees of nearby industrial estates will be negatively affected 1 TfL cutting services to save money 1 8 3.3 Other Suggestions Some respondents suggested changes to the proposal or took the opportunity to re-iterate their concerns and also comment more widely about the service. Issue Total There should be a higher frequency of bus services 41 Route(s) should be extended to Kingsbury 12 Waiting times are too high 7 Route(s) should serve Stonebridge Park Station 6 Bigger buses should be used 5 Routes should serve The Paddocks 5 24 hour bus service would be beneficial 3 Brentfield Road should be hail and ride 2 Route 206 should have a traditional timetabled schedule (i.e. not a bus will arrive every 10-15 minutes) 1 Bus route 440 should be extended to Wembley Arena 1 9 4. Responses from statutory bodies and other stakeholders TfL had nine responses from Stakeholders and these are summarised below: The London Borough of Brent Brent officers stated that the changes represent an improvement in a number of respects. It would also provide links from the south of Brent to the new Civic Centre. A further extension of route 206 northwards to Queensbury was suggested (or route 305 extended southwards from Queensbury). There are concerns that Hillside in Stonebridge would lose its direct link to both Central Middlesex Hospital and Brent Park. Could route 223 be extended to Northwick Park Hospital and Harrow from North Wembley to allow passengers to make a direct journey? Councillor Daniel Brown – London Borough of Brent Could route 440 be extended from Stonebridge via Harrow Rd and Brentfield Road to avoid the loss of service from Stonebridge Park/Harrow Road to Brent Park Tesco’s. Other than that these are reasonable proposals Caroline Pidgeon – London Assembly Member Could route 223 be extended to Northwick Park as this will improve access to the local hospital for many people in the Wembley/Sudbury area. Navin Shah – London Assembly Member The increase in capacity and frequency for passengers in the Wembley area is welcome. It would be beneficial for local residents if the 206 could be extended to terminate at Queensbury Station to give an easier link to Central Middlesex Hospital. Route 223 is shown on the map along Empire Way instead of Wembley Park Drive. Residents currently use this route as a quick way to get from Preston Road to Wembley Central but the proposed changes will lengthen the journey time. Furthermore, a number of buses already serve Empire Way. Barry Gardiner – Member of Parliament for Brent North On behalf of the Chairman at BAPS Swaminarayan Mandir Temple, the temple and the devotees are quite supportive of the changes. However, could route 206 be extended to Queensbury Station, or at least at the Kingsbury roundabout. This will benefit devotees as well as residents, who travel to Central Middlesex Hospital and other local amenities. The London Borough of Ealing LB Ealing officers have no objection to the proposals. If the proposals are implemented, they should be closely monitored and reviewed regularly. Councillor Zaffar Van Kalwala – London Borough of Brent These changes are an improvement on the present arrangements, particularly with regard to improving links to the borough’s new Civic Centre and surrounding developments. However, there are some reservations. 10 The Swaminarayan Temple on Brentfield Road attracts a great number of worshippers and tourists. A significant number live in the north of the borough (Kingsbury area). The temple is also a ‘London Landmark’ for the London 2012 Olympics. Could route 206 be further extended to terminate at ideally Queensbury Station or the Kingsbury roundabout. Or could route 305 be extended from its present terminus at Kingsbury Circle to Central Middlesex Hospital, along Fryent Way and The Paddocks, Wembley Park, Great Central Way and Brentfield Road. North West London Hospitals Trust – NHS The North West London Hospitals NHS Trust is responsible for Central Middlesex and Northwick Park Hospitals and encourages staff, patients and visitors to use public transport, cycling, walking and car sharing whenever possible.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Decision of the Election Committee on a Due Impartiality Complaint Brought by the Respect Party in Relation to the London Deba
    Decision of the Election Committee on a due impartiality complaint brought by the Respect Party in relation to The London Debate ITV London, 5 April 2016 LBC 97.3 , 5 April 2016 1. On Friday 29 April 2016, Ofcom’s Election Committee (“the Committee”)1 met to consider and adjudicate on a complaint made by the Respect Party in relation to its candidate for the London Mayoral election, George Galloway (“the Complaint”). The Complaint was about the programme The London Debate, broadcast in ITV’s London region on ITV, and on ITV HD and ITV+1 at 18:00 on Tuesday 5 April 2016 (“the Programme”). The Programme was broadcast simultaneously by LBC on the local analogue radio station LBC 97.3, as well as nationally on DAB radio and on digital television (as a radio channel). 2. The Committee consisted of the following members: Nick Pollard (Chair, Member of the Ofcom Content Board); Dame Lynne Brindley DBE (Member of the Ofcom Board and Content Board); Janey Walker (Member of the Ofcom Content Board); and Tony Close (Ofcom Director with responsibility for Content Standards, Licensing and Enforcement and Member of the Ofcom Content Board). 3. For the reasons set out in this decision, having considered all of the submissions and evidence before it under the relevant provisions of the Broadcasting Code (“the Code”), the Committee decided not to uphold the Respect Party’s complaint. The Committee found that in respect of ITV the broadcast of the Programme complied with the requirements of the Code. In the case of LBC, the Programme did not a contain list of candidates in the 2016 London Mayoral election (in audio form) and LBC therefore breached Rule 6.11.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Royal ■ London ■ Nw10 7Ny
    waxlow road PARK ROYAL ■ LONDON ■ NW10 7NY D A O R W O L X A W New Industrial/Warehouse Development in Park Royal 25,400 to 32,950 sq ft (2,406 to 3,061 sq m) This Draft is intended for feedback as the image develops. Elements may be work in progress or yet to be addressed project name: WaxlowPARK Road ROYALNotes: - image title: Imagewww.canmoor.com/parkroya 01 - Aerial View l Draft 01 issue date: 10/03/2016 code: DCA006_IM01_D01 Oxford +44(0)1865 552006 / London +44(0)20 3637 1125 / www.blinkimage.com waxlow road PARK ROYAL ■ LONDON ■ NW10 7NY DESCRIPTION Mus apersped mo inctus sitaquam ex et utatus net omnimusci adit endeles veritem es saperi aut haribus et qui doluptat mo enihitae omni dio elicabo. Obis mollam, WAXLOW ROAD quam hitium ut late et as eius quo dolorit INDICATIVE IMAGE atemquat porest perferspieni dolorepratia FIRST & SECOND FLOOR OFFICES SUB-STATION UNIT 2 30M ACCOMMODATION FIRST & SECOND FLOOR OFFICES UNIT 1 Unit 1 sq ft sq ft Warehouse 21,400 1,989 33M Offices 5,110 475 INDICATIVE IMAGE INDICATIVE IMAGE Total 26,510 2,464 GRAND UNION CANAL Unit 2 sq ft sq ft SPECIFICATION EXTERNAL WAREHOUSE OFFICES Warehouse 28,230 2,623 ■ Established industrial location ■ Self-contained warehouse ■ EPC rating of BREEAM Excellent ■ Level access loading doors ■ Minimum clear internal height of 11m ■ Self-contained warehouse Offices 5,930 551 ■ Planning for B1, B2 & B8 uses ■ TBC ■ TBC Total 34,160 3,174 Areas are GEA. PARK ROYAL www.canmoor.com/parkroyal waxlow road Harlow PARK ROYAL ■ LONDON ■ NW10 7NY A1(M) M1 A10 M11 D STONEBRIDGE
    [Show full text]
  • London Assembly London Voters Elect Both an Assembly Member for Each Constituency and Also ‘Top-Up’ Members for the Whole City Constituency Members
    London Assembly London voters elect both an assembly member for each constituency and also ‘top-up’ members for the whole city Constituency members Total of 25 seats Liberal Party Votes Turnout Labour Conservatives Democrats Greens UKIP BNP Barnet and Camden Net loss Net loss 1 2 2 2 1 Brian Coleman Conservative 70,659 46.33% Net gain Net gain Net gain Bexley and Bromley James Cleverly Conservative 105,162 49.13% Total Total Total Total Total Total Brent and Harrow 8 11 3 2 0 1 Navin Shah Labour 57,760 42.17% City and East 14 seats Containing boroughs: in directly elected Barking & Dagenham,Newham, Tower Hamlets, City of London constituencies 33.26% John Biggs Labour 63,635 39.79% % vote for winner Enfield & 40.48% Haringey Croydon and Sutton Barnet & Steve O'Connel Conservative 76,477 45.16% Camden Ealing and Hillingdon 37.29% Richard Barnes Conservative 74,710 41.53% Brent & 47.67% Harrow Havering Enfield and Haringey 42.90% & Redbridge North East Joanne McCartney Labour 52,665 42.9% 43.15% 33.97% Ealing & City & East Greenwich and Lewisham Hillingdon 53.41% Len Duvall Labour 53,174 42.29% West Havering and Redbridge Central 36.21% Roger Evans Conservative 78,493 44.58% 37.16% Greenwich Lambeth and Southwark Lambeth & 40.82% & Lewisham Val Shawcross Labour 60,601 41.27% South West 44.85% Southwark Merton & Merton and Wandsworth Wandsworth Richard Tracey Conservative 75,103 46.18% 52.60% North East Bexley & Containing boroughs: Bromley Waltham Forest, Hackney, Islington 44.08% Jeanette Arnold Labour 73,551 37.95% Croydon & Sutton South West Containing boroughs Hounslow, Richmond upon Thames, Kingston upon Thames Tony Arbour Conservative 76,913 45,39% London-wide members West Central Containing boroughs: BNP Westminster, Kensington & Chelsea, Hammersmith & Fulham Kit Malthouse Conservative 86.651 43.15% Andrew Victoria Gareth Nicky Murad Mike Dee Caroline Jenny Darren Richard Boff Borwick Bacon Gavron Qureshi Tuffrey Doocey Pidgeon Jones Johnson Barnbrook.
    [Show full text]
  • Number of Votes Recorded Rathy ALAGARATNAM UK Independence
    GLA 2016 ELECTIONS ELECTION OF A CONSTITUENCY MEMBER OF THE LONDON ASSEMBLY RESULTS Constituency Brent & Harrow Declaration of Results of Poll I hereby give notice as Constituency Returning Officer at the election of a constituency member of the London Assembly for the Brent & Harrow constituency held on 5 May 2016 that the number of votes recorded at the election is as follows: - Name of Candidates Name of Registered Political Party (if any) Number of Votes Recorded Rathy ALAGARATNAM UK Independence Party (UKIP) 9074 Joel Erne DAVIDSON The Conservative Party Candidate 59147 Anton GEORGIOU London Liberal Democrats 11534 Jafar HASSAN Green Party 9874 Akib MAHMOOD Respect (George Galloway) 5170 Navin SHAH Labour Party 79902 The number of ballot papers rejected was as follows:- (a) Unmarked 1814 (b) Uncertain 107 (c) Voting for too many 569 (d) Writing identifying voter 14 (e) Want of official mark 2 Total 2506 And I do hereby declare the said Navin SHAH, Labour Party is duly elected as constituency member of the Greater London Authority for the said constituency. Signed - Constituency Returning Officer Carolyn Downs Page 1 of 1 Generated On: 13/05/2016 12:27:25 Final Results GLA 2016 ELECTIONS CONSTITUENCY MEMBER OF THE LONDON ASSEMBLY RESULTS Constituency Brent & Harrow Total number of ballot papers counted 177207 Name of Candidates Name of Registered Political Party Number of Votes Recorded (if any) Rathy ALAGARATNAM UK Independence Party (UKIP) 9074 Joel Erne DAVIDSON The Conservative Party Candidate 59147 Anton GEORGIOU London Liberal
    [Show full text]
  • Park Royal Opportunity Area Planning Framework Part B
    PAGE106 Mayor of London Chapter 10 Park Royal proposals 10.1 Introduction 10.2 Central Park Royal 10.3 The Northern Gateway and Alperton 10.4 The Western Gateway 10.5 The Southern Gateway 10.6 The Eastern Gateway 10.7 Neighbourhood Centre the Heart of Park Royal PAGE107 10.1 Introduction OBJECTIVE 1 Protect and maintain Park Royal as the largest industrial employment location in London, Park Royal, together with Willesden The OAPF proposes to intensify commercial supporting the clusters of food/drink, Junction, extends to 700 hectares. It development on under utilised sites across Park distribution/logistics and TV/film through accommodates a range of employment Royal. Regeneration must continue to ensure the facilities and services to support growth. estate functions as a prime location for business uses from manufacturing to in London. Some sites have planning guidance; distribution/logistics and TV/film, with others have site-specific allocations in LDFs. OBJECTIVE 6 approximately 2,000 businesses and The OAPF identifies four gateways, and a Improve access to Park Royal at the four Gateways, employing around 40,000 people. Neighbourhood Centre at the heart of Park Royal. Alperton, Old Oak and Kensal Canalside and secure London Plan policy 5F.2 identifies Park These areas have the capacity to accommodate successful redevelopment of major sites to deliver a more intense form of mixed-use development employment-led growth, high quality amenities and Royal as an Opportunity Area with a of approximately 294,849 sq.m. of mix commercial a better environment. target to accommodate 11,000 new jobs and 500 new homes over the next uses and all of the proposed 3,500 residential units.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Report 793 795 London Road
    793-795 London Road - proposed red route restrictions Consultation summary July 2016 Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 1 1 Background ................................................................................................................ 2 2 Scheme description .................................................................................................... 2 3 The consultation ......................................................................................................... 4 4 Overview of consultation responses ............................................................................ 5 5 Responses from statutory bodies and other stakeholders ........................................... 7 6 Conclusion and next steps .......................................................................................... 7 Appendix A – Response to issues raised .............................................................................. 8 Appendix B – Consultation Materials ..................................................................................... 9 Appendix C – List of stakeholders consulted ....................................................................... 13 Executive Summary Between 5 February and 17 March 2017, we consulted on proposed changes to parking restrictions at the area in front of 793-795 London Road, Croydon. The consultation received 11 responses, with 7 responses supporting or partially supporting
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-01-31-Making-The-Most-Of-Social-Media-To-Promote
    Making the most of Social Media to promote #CleanAirforChildren 1. Tips for using Twitter and Facebook at the Clean Air for Children London Question Time event ● Use our ‘How to find your elected representatives in England’ guide to identify your local representatives. Make a list of who you want to tweet at and share Facebook posts or messages with and search for them a few days before the event, these might include: ✓ Your MP ✓ Mayor of London - @MayorofLondon ✓ Your ward councillors ✓ Your Council Leader ✓ Your London Assembly Member ✓ Chairs/Deputy Chairs of the London Assembly’s Transport and Environment Committees ▪ Environment ▪ Chair: Caroline Russell - @CarolineRussell ▪ Deputy Chair: Leonie Cooper - @LeonieC ▪ Transport ▪ Chair: Caroline Pidgeon - @CarolinePidgeon ▪ Deputy Chair: Florence Eshalomi - @FloEshalomi ✓ Your borough council (search under the name of your borough and twitter, e.g., LB Camden Twitter, LB Hounslow Twitter) ● Keep your tone positive and respectful even if you are being challenging or critical. ● Use the hashtags #cleanairforchildren and #Llondon ● If you have enough characters remaining in your tweets, it might be good to add in #cleanair or #airpollution into your tweets so they are picked up and retweeted by a larger audience. ● Tag or retweet to the @ClientEarth and @lunguk Twitter accounts. ● If you are directing your tweet at somebody in particular, make sure that others can also see it by putting a full-stop before their Twitter account name to start the message, e.g.: “.@[yourMP] will you... “. ● If posting on Facebook, focusing on your ‘personal pollution story’ could win more likes and shares – write about how dirty air in your area affects you, your children and your community and why this has led you to call for action.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Access Statement
    NORTHFIELDS Design and Access Statement Volume 1 - Outline application Produced by: Terence O’Rourke January 2018 St George Developments Limited St George House 16 The Boulevard Imperial Wharf Fulham SW6 2UB © Terence O’Rourke Ltd 2018. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form or stored in a retrieval system without the prior written consent of the copyright holder. All figures (unless otherwise stated) © Terence O’Rourke Ltd 2018. Based upon the 2017 Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of the Ordnance Survey on behalf of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown Copyright Terence O’Rourke Ltd Licence number 100019980. NORTHFIELDS Design and Access Statement Volume 1 - Outline application Produced by: Terence O’Rourke January 2018 St George Developments Limited St George House 16 The Boulevard Imperial Wharf Fulham SW6 2UB © Terence O’Rourke Ltd 2018. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form or stored in a retrieval system without the prior written consent of the copyright holder. All figures (unless otherwise stated) © Terence O’Rourke Ltd 2018. Based upon the 2017 Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of the Ordnance Survey on behalf of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown Copyright Terence O’Rourke Ltd Licence number 100019980. 1 NORTHFIELDS THE VISION The vision for Northfields is to open and transform the site, reconnecting the local area with the Grand Union Canal and River Brent, creating and improving routes to Stonebridge Park station and providing new homes, new employment space, public open spaces and local amenities, including a community centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Tender Specs
    7. Service Specification Route: 440 Contract Reference QC44303 This Service Specification forms section 7 of the ITT and should be read in conjunction with the ITT document, Version 1 dated 29 September 2011. You are formally invited to tender for the provision of the bus service detailed below and in accordance with this Service Specification. Tenderers must ensure that a Compliant Tender is submitted and this will only be considered for evaluation if all parts of the Tender documents, as set out in section 11, have been received by the Corporation by the Date of Tender. The Tender must be fully completed in the required format, in accordance with the Instructions to Tenderers. A Compliant Tender must comply fully with the requirements of the Framework Agreement; adhere to the requirements of the Service Specification; and reflect the price of operating the Services with new vehicles. Terminus Points Gunnersbury, Power Road to Stonebridge Park Station Contract Basis Incentivised Commencement Date 24th May 2014 Vehicle Type 60 capacity, dual door, single deck, minimum 10.8m long, subject to a satisfactory route test Current Maximum Approved 10.2 metres long and 2.55 metres wide Dimensions New Vehicles Mandatory Yes Hybrid Price Required Yes Sponsored Route No Advertising Rights Operator Minimum Performance Standard Departing on Time - No less than 82.00% Extension Threshold Departing on Time Threshold - 86.00% Minimum Operated Mileage No less than 98.00% Standard The Date of Tender for this ITT is: No later than 12 Noon on Monday 3rd June 2013 Tenderers should refer to section 3 of Part A for the Service Specification Explanatory Notes and Appendix B of section 5 for the Example Service Specification of the ITT document.
    [Show full text]
  • Tudor Estate Availability
    PARK ROYAL NW10 7UN PARK ROYAL TUDOR ESTATE AVAILABILITY WAREHOUSE / INDUSTRIAL UNITS CLOSE TO THE A406 TARGET ROUNDABOUT M40 / M25 A40 WESTERN AVENUE HANGER LANE STATION NORTH CIRCULAR ROAD (A406) GRAND UNION CANAL ABBEY ROAD CENTRAL LONDON SEGRO.com/parkroyal TUDOR ESTATE FLEXIBLE SPACE FOR DYNAMIC BUSINESS REQUIREMENTS WAREHOUSE / INDUSTRIAL UNITS AVAILABLE TO LET FROM 1,735 SQ FT. Tudor Estate provides the opportunity for companies to locate to a vibrant and established business environment, with direct access from Abbey Road to the North Circular (A406). A range of different sized units all benefit from level loading access and generous car parking provision, amongst well-known occupiers. Prominent site with exceptional Local occupiers include Bleep UK PLC, access to the A406, A40, the Warmup, Elite Moving Systems, national motorway network and Premier Moves, Resapol, H. G. Walter M1/A40/A406 < TO A406 NORTH CIRCULAR ROAD Central London and Crown Paints 703 Highly accessible with Stonebridge Park Royal is a strategic Park overland and underground business location with station (Bakerloo Line) only a short over 1,700 businesses walk away and 43,100 employees 702 ESS 704 ESS 701A 730 TUDOR ESTATE 701B 701C 701D 731 TUDOR ESTATE IS HOME TO 708A 708B 708C 6 ESTABLISHED LOCAL OCCUPIERS: 708D 5 732 708E 4 ABBEY ROAD 3 733 739 2 1 ESS GRAND UNION ESTATE 735 738 734 10 9 736 8 7 737 GRAND UNION CANAL A40 TWYFORD ABBEY ROAD M1 (J1) NW10 7UN STONEBRIDGE PARK A404 CRAVEN PAR K DRIVING DISTANCES RO AD TUDOR STONEBRIDGE PARK STATION 0.7 miles ESTATE HARLESDEN A40 WESTERN AVENUE 1.2 miles R LA HARLESDEN STATION 2.4 miles U PARK ROYAL RC HANGER I A C B NORTH ACTON STATION 3.0 miles LANE H B T E AD R D Y RO OA O R M1 (JUNCTION 1) 4.0 miles Y R N N E O O B T B A C 6 A A 0 RD D M4 (JUNCTION 1) 5.2 miles 4 O A YF M40 & W CENTRAL T MIDDLESEX CENTRAL LONDON 8.6 miles M25 HOSPITAL AD O M40 (J1) / M25 (J16) 12.0 miles R N O D ROAD TI P A A RAINSFORD ON A NORTH HEATHROW AIRPORT 12.6 miles R R CO O K D RD.
    [Show full text]
  • LGA and ALDC at the Liberal Democrat Virtual Autumn Conference
    LGA and ALDC at the Liberal Democrat Virtual Autumn Conference Friday 25 September How can we revive our town centres? How can we help our town centres recover and what are the challenges? 5pm – 5.50pm Speakers include: Tim Farron, MP Councillor Emily Smith, Leader, Vale of White Horse DC Elected Mayor Dave Hodgson, Bedford Borough Council Kirsten Henly, ’Kingston First’ Business Improvement District Chair: Councillor Heather Kidd, Chair, LGA Liberal Democrat Group Saturday 26 September Working in coalition in local government – From York to Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole What are the challenges and successes in working with other parties to run our councils? 9am – 9.50am Speakers include: Councillor Keith Aspden, Leader, City of York Councillor Darryl Smalley, City of York Councillor Vikki Slade, Bournemouth, Christchurch & Poole Council Chair: Councillor Alan Connett, Chief Whip, LGA Liberal Democrat Group Stop the power grab: How to oppose the government’s meddling in our planning system while delivering the homes we need 1pm – 1.50pm Speakers include: Sir Ed Davey MP, Leader of the Liberal Democrats Councillor Tumi Hawkins, South Cambridgeshire DC Baroness Olly Grender, Liberal Democrat Housing Spokesperson, House of Lords Giddon Amos, Former Chief Executive Town and Planning Association Chair: Councillor Howard Sykes, Leader, LGA Liberal Democrats Sunday 27 September You’ve declared a climate emergency, what next? Hear what steps Liberal Democrat Councils are taking 1pm – 1.50pm Speakers include: Wera Hobhouse MP Victoria Marsom,
    [Show full text]
  • Harlesden Neighbourhood Plan
    Appendix A: Harlesden Neighbourhood Plan HARLESDEN NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2019 - 2034 May 2019 Images in this document produced by Harlesden Neighbourhood Hood Forum unless otherwise stated. With thanks to Crisis Brent Community Researcher volunteers and photography group, as well as to our Forum members, local volunteers and all those who have contributed to the preparation of this document. A welcome from the Chair of the Harlesden Neighbourhood Forum Welcome to the Harlesden Neighbourhood Plan - a vision of how Harlesden can develop and grow over the next fifteen years whilst preserving its distinct heritage. Policies within the Neighbourhood Plan are restricted to matters amenable to planning – primarily the built, physical environment. The Plan’s remit does not extend to local services, cultural and arts activities or economic development, although of course planning policies can contribute to the protection and growth of all these things. Harlesden Neighbourhood Forum’s ambitions for our area however go far beyond planning policy. We hope you will continue to engage with the development of the Plan and work of the Forum throughout the formal process and beyond. Beyond the Plan we are keen to develop an exciting and unique offer for visitors and residents alike based on Harlesden’s cultural and artistic diversity. Harlesden is a colourful, neighbourhood in north west London, home to people from across the world, where you can sample a dizzying range of cultures and cuisines from Brazilian to Polish, Trinidadian to Somali. Where, in a single visit, you can pop into some of the best Caribbean food stores in London, admire the beauty and history of Harlesden’s churches or enjoy the outdoors in beautiful Roundwood Park or one of our newly regenerated pocket parks.
    [Show full text]