DOCSLIB.ORG

PUBLICATIONS of the ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY of the PACIFIC Vol. XLI San Francisco, California, October, 1929 No. 243 the OLDEST

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PUBLICATIONS of the ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY of the PACIFIC Vol. XLI San Francisco, California, October, 1929 No. 243 the OLDEST PUBLICATIONS OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF THE PACIFIC Vol. XLI San Francisco, California, October, 1929 No. 243 THE OLDEST ASTRONOMERS KNOWN By Professor H. H. Turner I gladly respond to the suggestion that I should write for the Astronomical Society of the Pacific something about the old astronomers, for, though California has the best possible opportunities for appreciating the most recent advances in as- tronomy, it may not as yet be so well equipped for learning of the steadily growing knowledge of the past, a growth in the last quarter of a century nearly as remarkable as that provided by the splendid instruments on the Pacific shores. Who were the earliest astronomers of note? It is a ques- tion which appeals to a public wider than that of astronomers themselves. The whole world feels an interest in those early heroes who, in loneliness almost certainly, and perhaps in the face of active opposition, laid the sure foundations on which our present-day science was built. And the correct answer to this question was not known, not even suspected, a quarter of a century ago. Dr. J. K. Fotheringham, Reader in Ancient Astronomy and Chronology in the University of Oxford, re- cently collected the main facts in a public lecture with the title "The Indebtedness of Greek to Chaldean Astronomy," printed in the Observatory magazine for October, 1928, and he dates our first inkling of the correct answer from 1906, twenty-three years ago. Before then we should have given the Greeks the credit for being the first serious astronomers, the Chaldeans being regarded merely as astrologers who tried to foretell events by the stars. A single example will suffice to illustrate this attitude. Writing in 1862 a Historical Survey of the Astronomy of the Ancients, Sir George Cornewall Lewis begins with the Greeks ; though in some concluding chapters he refers to the Babylonians (Chaldeans) and Egyptians as having made "rude 291 © Astronomical Society of the Pacific · Provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System 292 PUBLICATIONS OF THE observations unassisted by instruments and doubtless irregu- larly and imperfectly recorded ; it may be reasonably suspected that they were directed particularly to phenomena, such as eclipses, to which a superstitious interest attached." "We can- not," he continues, "consistently with the capacity and tendencies of the Oriental mind, suppose that either of these nations ever rose to the conception of astronomy as a science." He is inclined to ascribe the traditional origin of astronomy in Babylon to the fancies of the Greeks themselves. "The Greeks were so much in the habit of finding a fabulous origin for every useful art and invention that the stories which connected the original cultiva- tion of astronomy with the Babylonians, the Egyptians, and the Phoenicians would not, of themselves, deserve more credit than the legend which made Amphion the inventor of music" (p. 262). Now let us turn to Dr. Fotheringham's lecture, and learn something of Naburiannu and Kidinnu, two Chaldeans whom the Greeks called Naburianos and Cidenas, who "are entitled to a place among the greatest of astronomers," but whose achievements have been hitherto ascribed to others. Until 1906 Cidenas was known only from a passage in Pliny as having made a statement about the planet Mercury, and Naburianos was entirely unknown. Since 1906 they have become known (through Greek texts printed for the first time between 1906 and 1926, and Babylonian texts published from 1900 to 1926), as authors of systems for computing the places and motions of the Sun and Moon. Much of this knowledge is due to the industry of German Jesuit Fathers, Epping, Strassmaier, and Kugler; others who have contributed are Kroll, Schiaparelli, Weidner, and Schnabel. Let us do honor to these names, for they have taught us to know and honor the great names of Naburiannu and Kidinnu, thus removing one of Sir G. C. Lewis's strongest arguments against the existence of serious astronomy in Chaldea, that no great names had come down to us. He writes, "If any of the Chaldaean and Egyptian priests had really possessed the profound and exact knowledge of as- tronomy which is attributed·to them in a body, we should probably have heard his name. Someone would have gained an © Astronomical Society of the Pacific · Provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF THE PACIFIC 293 individual reputation: his writings or his discourses would have become celebrated ; and he would have been distinguished from the mass. Neither Plato nor Aristotle, nor any of the earlier writers, however, name any Babylonian or Egyptian in reference to astronomical observations" (p. 288). It is an impressive argument, but a dangerous one; rather like invoking the testimony of witnesses who did not see the crime committed. Apparently the fault was with the witnesses, especially Aristotle, to whom his nephew, Callisthenes, sent a collection of Babylonian observations by request, an incident which Dr. Fotheringham calls "the great event in the develop- ment of exact astronomy in Greece." But Aristotle apparently forgot to leave on record the names of the observers to whom he was indebted, though we owe to him so much in other ways that we can afford to forgive this omission. It is not surprising to find that there is a certain amount of truth in the views of Sir G. C. Lewis, in spite of their being essentially at variance with this modern view. It was by the study of eclipses that Naburiannu and Kidinnu arrived at their wonderfully exact knowledge; and it may well have been that this study had its origin in the "superstitious interest attaching to them." The important thing was that the study was suffi- ciently protracted and systematic to reveal the recurrence of eclipses at nearly the same place after an interval of fifty-four years and one month. Once this essential fact was grasped (and clearly it could not have been realized without at least a century or two of watching and recording), it is pretty clear that there would be a real interest in verifying it at each successive repe- tition. But this could not be done without a civilization which could preserve continuity of record over long periods, through priestly traditions or otherwise. Apparently the Chaldeans had such a measure of civilization, so that they accumulated ob- servations of the eclipses of the Sun and Moon over many centuries, from which Naburiannu and Kidinnu deduced such accurate values for the movements of these bodies that in one instance they actually beat the best modern knowledge. "So it seems," writes Dr. Fotheringham, "that Cidenas's (Kidinnu's) Canon of Eclipses actually contained a better value © Astronomical Society of the Pacific · Provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System 294 PUBLICATIONS OF THE for this motion than that which is used in our standard modern Canon. You may imagine how much better Cidenas's value was if you compare it, not with Oppolzer's value for his own day, but with Oppolzer's value for Cidenas's day." Let us turn aside for a moment to consider how the study of ancient eclipses, even without telescopes, is capable of giving us results of such surprising accuracy. In the figure let aOA represent a portion of the Sun's apparent path in the heavens, and bOB a portion of the Moon's path. The two paths are inclined at the small angle of five degrees and intersect each other at a point 0, called the node. There are two such nodes, Fig. 1 the other being always at the opposite point of the heavens ; though both of them change their places slowly. It takes a month for the Moon to go completely round the heavens, a year for the Sun to go completely round, and about 19 years for the node to go completely round. But these are only rough values ; the great question is. What are the accurate values? and "aris- ing out of that" as they say in Parliament, will the values be such that the same positions come round again? We can more readily visualize the second question if we think of three objects that can be actually seen such as three planets. Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. On a rare occasion we might see them all shining close together, and should naturally inquire when such a coin- cidence or "conjunction" would again occur. Knowing the times of revolution of Mars and Jupiter, we could easily cal- culate when they would come together again, but should prob- ably find that Saturn would not be anywhere in their neigh- borhood. If it happened to be (say) about ninety degrees (or a quarter, of the sky-circuit) away, then we might expect a triple conjunction after four times the interval just calculated. But probably its distance would not be such a simple fraction © Astronomical Society of the Pacific · Provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF THE PACIFIC 295 of the circuit as one-fourth ; it might be between one-eleventh and one-twelfth, say; and then at the eleventh conjunction of Mars and Jupiter, Saturn would not be near enough ; at the twelfth it would have gone too far. In fact it would be, so to speak, a piece of good luck if the periods happened to fit so that the triple conjunction came round in a reasonable time. Now the period of fifty-four years and one month repre- sents just such a piece of good luck, for the Sun, the Moon, and the node. We cannot see the node ; we can only infer its posi- tion from the way in which the Moon covers up part of the Sun.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In the Wake of the Compendia Science, Technology, and Medicine in Ancient Cultures
    In the Wake of the Compendia Science, Technology, and Medicine in Ancient Cultures Edited by Markus Asper Philip van der Eijk Markham J. Geller Heinrich von Staden Liba Taub Volume 3 In the Wake of the Compendia Infrastructural Contexts and the Licensing of Empiricism in Ancient and Medieval Mesopotamia Edited by J. Cale Johnson DE GRUYTER ISBN 978-1-5015-1076-2 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-1-5015-0250-7 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-1-5015-0252-1 ISSN 2194-976X Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2015 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin Typesetting: Meta Systems Publishing & Printservices GmbH, Wustermark Printing and binding: Hubert & Co. GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Notes on Contributors Florentina Badalanova Geller is Professor at the Topoi Excellence Cluster at the Freie Universität Berlin. She previously taught at the University of Sofia and University College London, and is currently on secondment from the Royal Anthropological Institute (London). She has published numerous papers and is also the author of ‘The Bible in the Making’ in Imagining Creation (2008), Qurʾān in Vernacular: Folk Islam in the Balkans (2008), and 2 (Slavonic Apocalypse of) Enoch: Text and Context (2010). Siam Bhayro was appointed Senior Lecturer in Early Jewish Studies in the Department of Theology and Religion, University of Exeter, in 2012, having previously been Lecturer in Early Jewish Studies since 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Babylonian Astral Science in the Hellenistic World: Reception and Transmission
    CAS® e SERIES Nummer 4 / 2010 Francesca Rochberg (Berkeley) Babylonian Astral Science in the Hellenistic World: Reception and Transmission Herausgegeben von Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Center for Advanced Studies®, Seestr. 13, 80802 München www.cas.lmu.de/publikationen/eseries Nummer 4 / 2010 Babylonian Astral Science in the Hellenistic World: Reception and Transmission Francesca Rochberg (Berkeley) In his astrological work the Tetrabiblos, the astronomer such as in Strabo’s Geography, as well as in an astrono- Ptolemy describes the effects of geography on ethnic mical text from Oxyrhynchus in the second century of character, claiming, for example, that due to their specific our era roughly contemporary with Ptolemy [P.Oxy. geographical location „The ...Chaldeans and Orchinians 4139:8; see Jones 1999, I 97-99 and II 22-23]. This have familiarity with Leo and the sun, so that they are astronomical papyrus fragment refers to the Orchenoi, simpler, kindly, addicted to astrology.” [Tetr. 2.3] or Urukeans, in direct connection with a lunar parameter Ptolemy was correct in putting the Chaldeans and identifiable as a Babylonian period for lunar anomaly Orchinians together geographically, as the Chaldeans, or preserved on cuneiform tablets from Uruk. The Kaldayu, were once West Semitic tribal groups located Babylonian, or Chaldean, literati, including those from in the parts of southern and western Babylonia known Uruk were rightly famed for astronomy and astrology, as Kaldu, and the Orchinians, or Urukayu, were the „addicted,” as Ptolemy put it, and eventually, in Greco- inhabitants of the southern Babylonian city of Uruk. He Roman works, the term Chaldean came to be interchan- was also correct in that he was transmitting a tradition geable with „astrologer.” from the Babylonians themselves, which, according to a Hellenistic Greek writers seeking to claim an authorita- Hellenistic tablet from Uruk [VAT 7847 obv.
    [Show full text]
  • A Concise History of Mathematics the Beginnings 3
    A CONCISE HISTORY OF A CONCISE HISTORY MATHEMATICS STRUIK OF MATHEMATICS DIRK J. STRUIK Professor Mathematics, BELL of Massachussetts Institute of Technology i Professor Struik has achieved the seemingly impossible task of compress- ing the history of mathematics into less than three hundred pages. By stressing the unfolding of a few main ideas and by minimizing references to other develop- ments, the author has been able to fol- low Egyptian, Babylonian, Chinese, Indian, Greek, Arabian, and Western mathematics from the earliest records to the beginning of the present century. He has based his account of nineteenth cen- tury advances on persons and schools rather than on subjects as the treatment by subjects has already been used in existing books. Important mathema- ticians whose work is analysed in detail are Euclid, Archimedes, Diophantos, Hammurabi, Bernoulli, Fermat, Euler, Newton, Leibniz, Laplace, Lagrange, Gauss, Jacobi, Riemann, Cremona, Betti, and others. Among the 47 illustra- tions arc portraits of many of these great figures. Each chapter is followed by a select bibliography. CHARLES WILSON A CONCISE HISTORY OF MATHEMATICS by DIRK. J. STRUIK Professor of Mathematics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology LONDON G. BELL AND SONS LTD '954 Copyright by Dover Publications, Inc., U.S.A. FOR RUTH Printed in Great Britain by Butler & Tanner Ltd., Frame and London CONTENTS Introduction xi The Beginnings 1 The Ancient Orient 13 Greece 39 The Orient after the Decline of Greek Society 83 The Beginnings in Western Europe 98 The
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Greek Mathēmata from a Sociological Perspective
    Ancient Greek Mathēmata from a Sociological Perspective: A Quantitative Analysis Leonid Zhmud, Institute for the History of Science and Technology, St. Petersburg Alexei Kouprianov, National Research University–Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg Abstract: This essay examines the quantitative aspects of Greco-Roman science, represented by a group of established disciplines that since the fourth century B.C.E. had been called mathēmata or mathēmatikai epistēmai. Among the mathēmata, which in antiquity normally comprised mathematics, mathematical astronomy, harmonics, mechanics, and optics, the essay also includes geography. Using a data set based on The Encyclopaedia of Ancient Natural Scientists, it considers a com- munity of mathēmatikoi (as they called themselves), or ancient scientists (as they are defined for the purposes of this essay), from a sociological point of view, fo- cusing on the size of the scientific population known to us and its disciplinary, temporal, and geographical distribution. A diachronic comparison of neighboring and partly overlapping communities—ancient scientists and philosophers—allows the pattern of their interrelationship to be traced. An examination of centers of sci- ence throughout ancient history reveals that there were five major sites—Athens, Al- exandria, Rhodes, Rome, and Byzantium/Constantinople—that appeared, in suc- cession, as leaders. These conclusions serve to reopen the issue of the place of mathēmata and mathēmatikoi in ancient society. he historiography of ancient Greek science is nearly as old as its subject. The earliest T known writings on the history of mathematics and astronomy belong to Eudemus of Rhodes, a pupil of Aristotle. When, after a long period of decline and oblivion in medieval Europe, the sciences were revived, it was ancient Greek science that became the primary sub- ject of Renaissance and early modern studies in the history of science.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Memory in and After the Persian Empire Persian the After and Memory in Political
    POLITICAL IN MEMORY AND AFTER THE PERSIAN EMPIRE At its height, the Persian Empire stretched from India to Libya, uniting the entire Near East under the rule of a single Great King for the rst time in history. Many groups in the area had long-lived traditions of indigenous kingship, but these were either abolished or adapted to t the new frame of universal Persian rule. is book explores the ways in which people from Rome, Egypt, Babylonia, Israel, and Iran interacted with kingship in the Persian Empire and how they remembered and reshaped their own indigenous traditions in response to these experiences. e contributors are Björn Anderson, Seth A. Bledsoe, Henry P. Colburn, Geert POLITICAL MEMORY De Breucker, Benedikt Eckhardt, Kiyan Foroutan, Lisbeth S. Fried, Olaf E. Kaper, Alesandr V. Makhlaiuk, Christine Mitchell, John P. Nielsen, Eduard Rung, Jason M. Silverman, Květa Smoláriková, R. J. van der Spek, Caroline Waerzeggers, IN AND AFTER THE Melanie Wasmuth, and Ian Douglas Wilson. JASON M. SILVERMAN is a postdoctoral researcher in the Faculty of eology PERSIAN EMPIRE at the University of Helsinki. He is the author of Persepolis and Jerusalem: Iranian In uence on the Apocalyptic Hermeneutic (T&T Clark) and the editor of Opening Heaven’s Floodgates: e Genesis Flood Narrative, Its Context and Reception (Gorgias). CAROLINE WAERZEGGERS is Associate Professor of Assyriology at Leiden University. She is the author of Marduk-rēmanni: Local Networks and Imperial Politics in Achaemenid Babylonia (Peeters) and e Ezida Temple of Borsippa: Priesthood, Cult, Archives (Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten). Ancient Near East Monographs Monografías sobre el Antiguo Cercano Oriente Society of Biblical Literature Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente (UCA) Edited by Waerzeggers Electronic open access edition (ISBN 978-0-88414-089-4) available at Silverman Jason M.
    [Show full text]
  • 15. the Biblical and Observational Case for Geocentricity
    The Biblical and Observational Case for Geocentricity A Place rather than a Path for the Earth IF THE EARTH AND ATMOSPHERE ARE SPINNING 1038 MPH AT THE EQUATOR, WHY IS THE EQUATOR CALLED THE DOLDRUMS? WHY DOES EARTH’S SUPPOSED SPIN HAVE SO LITTLE EFFECT ON EAST-WEST PLANE FLIGHTS? Compiled by J. A. Moorman WE DO NOT WANT TO BE FUNDAMENTALLY WRONG CONCERNING THE EARTH ON WHICH GOD HAS PLACED US. WE KNOW THAT DARWINISM IS WRONG. WE KNOW THAT BIG- BANGISM IS WRONG. THIS PRESENTATION PRESENTS THE CASE THAT COPERNICANISM IS ALSO WRONG, AND IN FACT PAVED THE WAY FOR DARWINISM. AS WITH DARWINISM, COPERNICANISM BECAME ESTABLISHED WITHOUT EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE. A SUBSTANTIAL CASE CAN BE MADE FOR THE GEOCENTRIC VIEW; BUT AS THIS IS A MATTER BARELY CONSIDERED TODAY, IT IS BEST TO SAY THAT THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ARE THOSE OF THE AUTHOR AND NOT NECESSARILY OF BETHEL BAPTIST CHURCH, LONDON OR OTHER GROUPS WITH WHICH THE AUTHOR FELLOWSHIPS. Contents Introduction 5 Part I: What the Senses Observe 9 Part II: What the Bible Declares 13 A Perceived Violation of Scripture Early Heliocentricists Knew They Were Violating Scripture Geocentric Passages Become the “Language of Appearance” Heaven and Earth Becomes the “Universe” John Gill: Halting Between Two Opinions The Foundation of the Earth: 21 Passages The Non-movement of the Earth (Except During End Time Judgements): 12 Passages The Stretching Out of the Heavens: 12 Passages The Movement of the Sun: 58 Passages The First, Second and Fourth Days: No Statement of Earth Motion An Examination of 50 Selected Passages
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth of Astronomy This Is Ephesus Full Moon Over Cape Sounio Photo by Anthony Ayiomitas • P
    The Birth of Astronomy This is Ephesus Full moon over Cape Sounio Photo by Anthony Ayiomitas • P Picture by Tunc Tezel Peter Watson, Dept. of Physics Peter Watson Sky view : Stars seem to rotate in circles, centred on the Lets turn off the sun, and track the planets now North Celestial Pole 100750928 Stars near the equator set 4 minutes earlier each night. We can make things a bit easier by freezing the stars and always looking South Note the sun tracks along a line in the sky, the Isn’t it complicated! “ecliptic”. Planets and moon more or less follow this • Midsummer day: when the sun rises/sets in most The first observatory (or the northerly position: sunrise aligns with “heel stone” earliest we know about) •Measured at Stonehenge: important to define seasons •Stonehenge and hence time to plant crops •Probably 2300 BC ± 100 years Peter Watson Peter Watson Sunset • Alignments let you measure summer solstice Midsummer sunrise Winter moonrise low point Midwinter Sunrise South-west West North-west Southern moonrise (minimum) Midwinter Equinox Midsummer Southern moonrise (maximum) 6 p.m. 4 p.m. 8 p.m. Midwinter sunset Northern moonset (minimum) Northern moonset (maximum) • Note that position varies more as you Winter moonrise high point move away from the equator http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~scidemos/ AstronomyAstrophysics/Stonehenge/ Stonehenge.html Peter Watson Peter Watson Colin Cole points out Carahunge, Armenia's Supposedly dates to 5500 BC, and also shows Stonehenge. astronomical alignments through holes in stones http://www.carahunge.com/ Peter Watson Peter Watson • 3200 BC Newgrange, Ireland •Note many other stone circles: e.g •Avebury (Wiltshire) •Callanish (Isle of Lewis) •Carnac (Brittany) Peter Watson Peter Watson • Sun illuminates long corridor on Winter Solstice Chankillo • Much later • Row of 13 towers on a ridge in a desert in Peru Peter Watson Peter Watson •From observation sites the towers line up with sunrise and sunset Babylon • The questions: •Can tell date to within 2-3 days.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cohesive Theology of Christian Living: Principles from the Book of Daniel
    LIBERTY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY A COHESIVE THEOLOGY OF CHRISTIAN LIVING: PRINCIPLES FROM THE BOOK OF DANIEL ____________________ A Thesis Project Submitted to Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF MINISTRY ____________________ By Jeremy C. Shaffer March 25, 2011 Copyright © 2011 Jeremy C. Shaffer All Rights Reserved LIBERTY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY THESIS PROJECT APPROVAL SHEET _________________GRADE _________________________________MENTOR _________________________________READER ABSTRACT A COHESIVE THEOLOGY OF CHRISTIAN LIVING: PRINCIPLES FROM THE BOOK OF DANIEL Jeremy C. Shaffer Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary, 2011 Mentor: Dr. Charlie Davidson The propensity to force preconceived ideologies and theological systems upon the interpretation of the book of Daniel is evident. The purpose of this project is to provide a proper interpretation of Daniel 1-6 so that proper applications can be made for preaching and teaching, trying to eliminate any preconceptions along the way that are forced upon the text. A six-part theology of Christian living is developed from the preaching outlines of each chapter, all connected to the book’s theme of sovereignty and thereby forming a cohesive unit. Ultimately, a greater appreciation for the value of the Old Testament in Christian living is at the core of this project. Abstract length: 108 words DEDICATION To my wife Rebekah and my two children Grace and Luke, you are my pride and joy this side of heaven. God only knows how much I love you and appreciate you. You have encouraged me to stay on track even when I did not feel like it. You have been there for me and I could not have done it without you.
    [Show full text]
  • Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-41955-0 — Between Greece and Babylonia Kathryn Stevens Index More Information INDEX Abnu Šikinšu, 273–4 Antimenidas, brother of Alcaeus, 16 Adapa, 98n.12, 99 Antioch on the Orontes, 28, 244, 246 Aḫ’ûtu family, Uruk, 226–7, 320, 324–6 in Akkadian texts, 256n.6, 259–60, 290, Akesines river, 286–7, 301, 309 293, 297, 306 akītu festival, 224, 321 library at, 164 Akkadian language, 4 Antiochus Cylinder, from Borsippa, 26, disappearance of, 370–1 198, 220–3, 251, 258 loan-words into Greek, 17 Antiochus I of Commagene, 72 transcriptions in Greek alphabet, 56–7, Antiochus I Soter 95, 117–19, 268. See also and Berossus, 114–17, 270 Graeco-Babyloniaca land grants in Babylonia, 358 usage in Hellenistic Babylonia, 25 patronage of Babylonian culture, 198, Alexander Balas, 206, 208, 244 220–4, 361–2 Alexander of Aetolia, 205 patronage of Greek intellectual culture, Alexander Polyhistor, 96, 106, 163 206–7, 214, 244, 247 Alexander the Great, 233, 283, 287 Antiochus II Theos, 116, 155, 201, 325, interactions with Chaldaeans, 86, 358 229–31 Antiochus III Megas, 227, 366 Alexandria, 27 patronage of Babylonian culture, 224–5 astrology at, 86 patronage of Greek intellectual culture, astronomy at, 86, 145 206, 242, 244, 246 Library and Museum. See Library of Antiochus VIII Epiphanes, 216 Alexandria; Museum of Alexandria Antiochus IX Eusebes Cyzicenus, 212 Almanacs, 49, 370, 378 antiscion, 72 ammatu. See cubit Anu (god), 321, 323, 326, 352, 354, Amurru, 264 378 Anaxandridas of Delphi, 335–6, 342 elevation in Uruk pantheon,
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in the Greek Astronomers
    Eudoxian Topics Huxley, George Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1963; 4, 2; ProQuest pg. 83 Studies in the Greek Astronomers George Huxley I Eudoxian Topics T IS OBVIOUS THAT EUDOXUS OF CNIDUS occupies a distinguished I position in the intellectual life of Greece in the fourth century B.C.: he was a mathematician, an astronomer, a lawgiver, and a geo­ grapher, and the interests of this astonishing man reached into medicine and philosophy. As an associate of Plato and a friend of Aristotle, Eudoxus repays examination by Platonists and Aristotel­ ians, but he is hardly less interesting for himself and his own work. He still awaits a biographer, but the range of his interests was so great and the evidence for his work is so fragmentary that it is doubtful whether a definitive biography could be written. In this essay we consider a few only of the outstanding problems concerning his life and work. The Chronology of Eudoxus' Life The attempt to determine the dates of his birth has given rise to a number of estimates ranging from 420 to about 390 B.C.! All make use of the statement of Apollodorus2 that Eudoxus died in his fifty-third year and flourished in the 103rd Olympiad (368 to 365 B.C.). If Apollo­ dorus placed his floruit in his fortieth year then he lived from ca. 408 B.C. to ca. 355 B.C., and these dates are given for his lifespan in many textbooks. However, we do not know that Apollodorus assumed that Eudoxus was forty in 368 B.C., and if Eudoxus died in 355 then he predeceased Plato; but a passage in Pliny shows clearly that Eudoxus 1 Among the dates suggested for his birth have been: 390, Fr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rosette of Spiral Diagrams As Produced by the Saros Series of Solar Eclipses
    THE ROSETTE OF SPIRAL DIAGRAMS AS PRODUCED BY THE SAROS SERIES OF SOLAR ECLIPSES DIMITRIE OLENICI1,2 1Astronomical Observatory, Stefan cel Mare University, Suceava 2The Romanian Society for Cultural Astronomy, Timisoara Abstract. This article presents a new concept to illustrate the chain of solar eclipses in accordance with the Saros cycle. Eclipses in a Saros cycle are placed in a circle de- pending on the calendar date. By concentrically placing several Saros circles in chrono- logical order, we notice that the Saros series appear in the form of spirals that resemble a rosette. In an entire Saros series we can easily notice where it begins and ends. By analyzing within the rosette representation the chain of eclipses – circular, radial, and spiral – we can highlight several cycles of eclipses. A correlation between the Saros cycle and the Maya cycles of repeating eclipses is also illustrated. Key words: Astronomy – Solar system – Eclipses – Saros. 1. BACKGROUND The Rosette of spiral diagrams of Saros series of solar eclipse was elaborated by the author in the 1990’s as a prelude to the total solar eclipse of August 11, 1999 which had the center in Romania near the town of Ramnicuˆ Valcea. With this occasion the author has published a book (in Romanian) about eclipses entitled The eclipse since the Sun the Moon and the World exists (Eclipsele de candˆ lumea Soarele s¸i Luna, Editura Casei Corpului Didactic, Suceava, 1999 – in Roma- nian). The book was reedited in 2015 when the spiral diagrams of Saros series of solar eclipse was added to the text (Olenici, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander in Babylon. a Tragedy in Five Acts
    ALEXANDER IN BABYLON. A TRAGEDY IN FIVE ACTS. BY H. A. PERSON AE : Alexander the Great. Hephaestion, Alexander's favorite and Poet. Nearchus, Alexander's Admiral. Craterus, Captain of Alexander's bodyguard. Ptolemy, a General. Promachus, a Soldier. Onesicritus, a Cynic Philosopher. Cassander, son of Antipater, the regent of Macedon. loLAUS, Alexander's Cupbearer and Cassander's brother. Aristander, a Greek Diviner. KiDiNNU, a Chaldsean Astrologer. Calanus, a Gymnosophist. Sisimithres, a Magian. RoxANA, a Medic princess, wife of Alexander. Statira, daughter of Darius Codomannus. Rachel, a Jewish slave, servant to Roxana. Orientals, Bacchanals, Greek Soldiers, Dancers, Singers, Servants, Persian Youths of Alexander's bodyguard. ACT I. Scene: A Street in Babylon. On either hand are flat-topped houses with balconied windows, the parapets of the houses and the balconies gay with the carpets of Babylon. Beneath the balconies, lining the street, are the party-colored shops of Oriental merchants. In the background is a temple wall, bright with encaustic tiling—brilliant rosettes and mythic monsters; while beyond the wall rise the seven stages of a pyramidal temple, each stage of a different color, with a golden zikkiirat shining at the top. People are to be seen everywhere, shopkeepers, women at the balconies, crowd- ing street and parapet—Babylonian Semites in gorgeously woven and trousers, pointed fringed robes, hair and beard curled ; Medes with baggy shoes and gay vests; Persians in long tunics, with bright sashes and ! : ! ! — ! 404 THE OPEN COURT. conical turbans; men of the desert in brown camel's hair robes; Ethiop- . ians in leopard skin, and Hindus in linen; Greeks in light tunics with chaplets of flowers on their heads or with helmet and cuirass, sword and spear.
    [Show full text]