DOCSLIB.ORG

Analytical Project Vladimir Putin‘S Russia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analytical Project Vladimir Putin‘S Russia ANALYTICAL PROJECT VLADIMIR PUTIN‘S RUSSIA January 9, 2014 No. 8 Do traces of KGB, FSB and GRU lead to Islamic State? Marius Laurinavičius, Senior Analyst, EESC Again, this article will not be related to the Crooke’s headline can be rephrased like this: ‘Is structure, clans, their interrelations, and KGB it really possible to fully understand the basis in Putin’s current regime. This essay is a phenomenon of the Islamic state without paying sequel of the previous piece which aimed to attention to the alleged links between Russian take another glimpse at Putin’s suspicious links secret services and Chechen terrorists?’ with international terrorism. Some things are hard to deny This time I decided to draw attention to a significant role (which was a surprise for many In general, the links between Chechen terrorist experts) of Chechen terrorists in a battle of and Russian secret services cannot be denied Islamic state that has become a main threat to even by those Western experts and the West. Based on this role, it is not only commentators who tend to call these links a possible, but vital to examine the potential links conspiracy theory. between the Islamic state and Russian secret services. The fact that the famous Shamil Basayev, Ruslan Gelayev and some others Chechen One of the inspiration sources was the article terrorist commanders began their career not published in ‘The Huffington Post’ called ‘You only fighting on the Russian side during the Can't Understand ISIS If You Don't Know the Georgian-Abkhaz war, but were directly trained History of Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia’1. It was by the special forces of Russian military written by Alastair Crooke, a famous expert of intelligence (GRU), was basically never even the Middle East terrorism, a former diplomat denied in Russia.2 The traces of GRU agents and a ranking figure in British intelligence MI-6 were not a secret as well.3 That article is definitely worth reading for all of those who want to understand more about the Even Yuri Drozdov, the legend of Russian phenomenon and threats of the Islamic state. secret services, former KGB General-Major and And I don’t even consider arguing with the a longtime chairman of the board at ‘S’, in his famous expert, especially when I, myself, do not interview for fontanka.ru in 2011 publicly aspire a career of terrorism expert. admitted that all this information about Basayev was true. According to Drozdov, Basayev was However, after long years of exploring Putin’s current regime and it’s KGB roots, I believe that 2 Миф о Басаеве - или кого он представляет на самом деле. http://www.apsny.ge/analytics/1128329041.php 3 Борис Кагарлицкий. С террористами не 1 Alastair Crooke.”You Can't Understand ISIS If You разговариваем. Но помогаем? Версия взрывов домов в Don't Know the History of Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia” России. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alastair-crooke/isis- http://2000.novayagazeta.ru/nomer/2000/03n/n03n- wahhabism-saudi-arabia_b_5717157.html s08.shtml 1 www.eesc.lt ANALYTICAL PROJECT VLADIMIR PUTIN‘S RUSSIA ‘one of the leaders of a special military However, this time the examination should not division’4. start from the aforementioned allegations. It is worth following Crooke’s example and examine Also undenied is the fact that Basayev’s the history of Wahhabism - not only in Saudi incursion into Dagestan and house bombing Arabia but in Chechnya and the former USSR in afterwards contributed, to say the least, to general. Because namely the so-called Chechen Putin’s coming to power. The Western world Wahhabis are now battling for Islamic terrorists has less and less doubt that this was all a well- - they were always the synonym for the term executed, although seemingly unthinkable, ‘terrorists’ in Russia. operation of Russian secret services. Russian journalist Sanobar Shermatova, who Whether we read Litvinenko's and Felshtisnky’s died in 2011, was considered not only a book ‘FSB blowing up Russia’5, David Satter’s journalist, but also one of the best Russian ‘Darkness at Dawn: The Rise of the Russian experts of Middle Asia and Caucasus. After the Criminal State’6, John Dunlop’s ‘The Moscow events in Chechnya and Dagestan in summer Bombings of September 1999: Examinations of 1999 she wrote a serious analytic piece called Russian Terrorist Attacks at the Onset of ‘The so-called Wahhabis’11. Vladimir Putin's Rule’78, or the especially popular investigation carried out by Karen In this essay Shermatova digs into Wahhabism Dawisha, professor at the Miami University, roots not only in Chechnya and Dagestan, but called ‘Putin's Kleptocracy: Who Owns also in Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kirghizia. Russia?’9, it is difficult to deny the tons of odd She doesn’t tend to any conspiracy theories, and coincidences and inexplicable actions of examines various links of ‘the so-called Russian government. In the meantime, Putin’s Wahhabis’ - also with Afghanistan, Pakistan regime closed all doors to any kind of and Saudi Arabia. investigations, and many people, who were trying to shed some light on these allegations, But the story begins with the protests in were murdered or died under very strange Dunshanbe in autumn 1991 that resulted in circumstances.10 Tajikistan government allowing the first free elections and registering the Islamic party12 (not What are the roots of Chechen’s without the help of Moscow’s go-betweens, Wahhabism? including Vladimir Putin and Anatolij Sobczak,1314 who is more likely Putin’s comrade rather than a democrat which he is often 4 Юрий Дроздов: Россия для США - не поверженный referred to - aut. note). противник, http://www.fontanka.ru/2011/03/05/042/ 5 Александр Литвиненко, Юрий Фельштинский “ФСБ взрывает Россию”, http://www.felshtinsky.com/books/FSB%203rd%20ed.20 Many authors in Tajikistan itself claim that 11.pdf namely the pressure from Sobczak-led 6 David Satter. “Darkness at Dawn: The Rise of the delegation led to Tajikistan’s government Russian Criminal State”, 2003. decision to register the Islamic party, although it 7 John B.Dunlop. “The Moscow Bombings of September 1999: Examinations of Russian Terrorist Attacks at the Onset of Vladimir Putin's Rule”, 2012. 11 Санобар Шерматова.”Так называемые ваххабиты”. 8 Amy Knight. “Finally, We Know About the Moscow http://old.sakharov-center.ru/chr/chrus20_1.htm Bombings”. 12 Душанбе-1990: русский взгляд. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/nov/22/fi http://www.fergananews.com/articles/6484 nally-we-know-about-moscow-bombings 13 Путин: “Эту прививку я получил от Собчака”. 9 Karen Dawisha. “Putin's Kleptocracy: Who Owns http://www.aif.ru/society/2183 Russia?”, 2014. 14 Олег Панфилов. “Таджикистан: неизвестная 10 Mona Charen. “The Despot in the Kremlin”. революция”. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/383301/despot- http://inosmi.ru/sngbaltia/20130315/206982497.html kremlin-mona-charen 2 www.eesc.lt ANALYTICAL PROJECT VLADIMIR PUTIN‘S RUSSIA has already been labeled extremists and ideas to a level where it turns out that KGB ‘Wahhabis’ by then.15 started to use the name ‘Wahhabis’ on those Muslim activists who were not willing to After emphasising that this Islamic party was collaborate with KGB in the first place18. merely a ‘branch of USSR Islamic Revival party’, Shermatova continued: ‘Islamic activists But none of these experts deny that establishing played a pretty important role in the opposition. a USSR Islam Revival party was a main I mean those who were called ‘Wahhabis’ in element of ‘Wahhabism’ rudiment in the former KGB chronicles. At the time this term was not USSR territory.1920 widely known, and not entirely understood even by those who were called this name. USSR had In the meantime, Akhmed Zakayev (who then banned the Islamic literature, and only those lived in London and was even called the Prime few who went to study in Arab countries, had minister of the unrecognised Chechen Republic knowledge about Islam history, movements and of Ichkeria), Aslan Maskhadov (former streams. But these people, as usual, were Chechnya’s president) and other so-called inspected for their loyalty to KGB, and then representatives of the wing of the secular battle included into ‘religious nomenclature’ while for Chechnya’s independence has long and constantly being controlled by the special consistently called many radicals the agents of services. Ordinary Muslims were not familiar Russian special services. Zakayev’s attitude with Muhammad Ibn Abd al-Wahhabi’s towards the aforementioned congress of USSR doctrine. In Shermatova’s research and in Islam Revival party in Astrakhan is also further investigation of Uzbekistan’s and unambiguous. Kirghizia’s ‘Wahhabis’, KGB traces stretch along the story. When the the founding congress of USSR Islamic Revival party was held in Astrakhan in Which theory is more reliable? 1989 (other sources say 1990, so Zakayev might be mistaken - aut. note), KGB undoubtedly Truth is, many other Russian researchers deny knew what they wanted. Just as Vladimir any role of the KGB in spreading Wahhabism Zhirinovsky’s liberal democrat party, which has ideas in the former USSR territory. For been preventing the true Russian liberal example, a famous Russian historian of religion democrats from uniting for two decades now, and Islamic researcher Roman Silantyev16 states the branches of USSR Islam Revival party, that that KGB allegedly had no more power to resist have taken roots into in Muslim regions of the this spread. Aleksei Kundryavtsev,17 associate at former USSR, have successfully separated the Moscow Institute of Oriental Studies, even Muslims by dividing them into ‘right’ and claims that the young generation of Islamists ‘wrong’. This is how Moscow turned Islamic turned the Wahhabism direction precisely radicalism into an effective vaccine against because the old religious authorities had KGB various nations’ movements for national shadows on them.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • James Rowson Phd Thesis Politics and Putinism a Critical Examination
    Politics and Putinism: A Critical Examination of New Russian Drama James Rowson A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Royal Holloway, University of London Department of Drama, Theatre & Dance September 2017 1 Declaration of Authorship I James Rowson hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: ______________________ Date: ________________________ 2 Abstract This thesis will contextualise and critically explore how New Drama (Novaya Drama) has been shaped by and adapted to the political, social, and cultural landscape under Putinism (from 2000). It draws on close analysis of a variety of plays written by a burgeoning collection of playwrights from across Russia, examining how this provocative and political artistic movement has emerged as one of the most vehement critics of the Putin regime. This study argues that the manifold New Drama repertoire addresses key facets of Putinism by performing suppressed and marginalised voices in public arenas. It contends that New Drama has challenged the established, normative discourses of Putinism presented in the Russian media and by Putin himself, and demonstrates how these productions have situated themselves in the context of the nascent opposition movement in Russia. By doing so, this thesis will offer a fresh perspective on how New Drama’s precarious engagement with Putinism provokes political debate in contemporary Russia, and challenges audience members to consider their own role in Putin’s autocracy. The first chapter surveys the theatrical and political landscape in Russia at the turn of the millennium, focusing on the political and historical contexts of New Drama in Russian theatre and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mujahedin in Nagorno-Karabakh: a Case Study in the Evolution of Global Jihad
    The Mujahedin in Nagorno-Karabakh: A Case Study in the Evolution of Global Jihad Michael Taarnby 9/5/2008 WP 20/2008 The Mujahedin in Nagorno-Karabakh: A Case Study in the Evolution of Global Jihad Michael Taarnby Summary The current volume of publications dealing with Islamist militancy and terrorism defies belief in terms of its contents. The topic of this paper is a modest attempt to direct more attention and interest towards the much overlooked sub-field of historical research within Jihadi studies. Introduction The current volume of publications dealing with Islamist militancy and terrorism defies belief in terms of its contents. This can be perceived as part of a frantic effort to catch up for the lack of attention devoted to this phenomenon during the 1980s and 1990s, when this field of research field was considerably underdeveloped. The present level of research activity is struggling to keep pace with developments. Thus, it is primarily preoccupied with attempting to describe what is actually happening in the world right now and possibly to explain future developments. This is certainly a worthwhile effort, but the topic of this paper is a modest attempt to direct more attention and interest towards the much overlooked sub-field of historical research within Jihadi studies. The global Jihad has a long history, and everyone interested in this topic will be quite familiar with the significance of Afghanistan in fomenting ideological support for it and for bringing disparate militant groups together through its infamous training camps during the 1990s. However, many more events have been neglected by the research community to the point where most scholars and analysts are left with an incomplete picture, that is most often based on the successes of the Jihadi groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Assemblée Parlementaire : 3E Partie De La Session De 2010 ( 21-25 Juin 2010) Parliamentary Assembly : 3Rd Part of the 2010 Session (21-25 June 2010)
    Assemblée parlementaire : 3e partie de la Session de 2010 ( 21-25 Juin 2010) Parliamentary Assembly : 3rd part of the 2010 Session (21-25 June 2010) … Recours juridiques en cas de violations des DH dans la région du Caucase du Nord - Intervention de M. Iounous-Bek Evkourov, Président de l’Ingouchie (Fédération de Russie) / Legal remedies for human rights violations in the North Caucasus Region – Statement by the President of Ingushetia Yunus-Bek Yevkurov.................................................................... 3 Russia approves PACE resolution on N Caucasus [28/06/2010-Hurriyet / Turkey] ..................3 PACE report on the North Caucasus approved - Yevkurov was the man of the day [27/06/2010-Novaya Gazeta / Russia].............................................................................4 European body denounces Chechnya 'climate of fear' [27/06/2010-Georgian Daily / Georgia - Reuters] ........................................................................................................7 Verletzung von Menschenrechten verurteilt [25/06/2010-Die Tageszeitung / Deutschland]................................................................................................................8 On Caucasus/Dick Marty report [25/06/2010- Ny tid / Norway]...........................................9 Russia Approves PACE Resolution On North Caucasus For First Time [24/06/2010-RFE / Czech Republic] ..........................................................................................................11 PACE declines idea to discuss
    [Show full text]
  • Inside Russia's Intelligence Agencies
    EUROPEAN COUNCIL ON FOREIGN BRIEF POLICY RELATIONS ecfr.eu PUTIN’S HYDRA: INSIDE RUSSIA’S INTELLIGENCE SERVICES Mark Galeotti For his birthday in 2014, Russian President Vladimir Putin was treated to an exhibition of faux Greek friezes showing SUMMARY him in the guise of Hercules. In one, he was slaying the • Russia’s intelligence agencies are engaged in an “hydra of sanctions”.1 active and aggressive campaign in support of the Kremlin’s wider geopolitical agenda. The image of the hydra – a voracious and vicious multi- headed beast, guided by a single mind, and which grows • As well as espionage, Moscow’s “special services” new heads as soon as one is lopped off – crops up frequently conduct active measures aimed at subverting in discussions of Russia’s intelligence and security services. and destabilising European governments, Murdered dissident Alexander Litvinenko and his co-author operations in support of Russian economic Yuri Felshtinsky wrote of the way “the old KGB, like some interests, and attacks on political enemies. multi-headed hydra, split into four new structures” after 1991.2 More recently, a British counterintelligence officer • Moscow has developed an array of overlapping described Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) as and competitive security and spy services. The a hydra because of the way that, for every plot foiled or aim is to encourage risk-taking and multiple operative expelled, more quickly appear. sources, but it also leads to turf wars and a tendency to play to Kremlin prejudices. The West finds itself in a new “hot peace” in which many consider Russia not just as an irritant or challenge, but • While much useful intelligence is collected, as an outright threat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Job
    The Russian Job The rise to power of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation “We did not reject our past. We said honestly: The history of the Lubyanka in the twentieth century is our history…” ~ Nikolai Platonovich Patrushev, Director of the FSB Between August-September 1999, a series of explosions in Russia killed 293 people: - 1 person dead from a shopping centre explosion in Moscow (31 st August) - 62 people dead from an apartment bombing in Buynaksk (4 th September) - 94 people dead from an apartment bombing in Moscow (9th September) - 119 people dead from an apartment bombing in Moscow (13 th September) - 17 people dead from an apartment bombing in Volgodonsk (16 th September) The FSB (Federal Security Service) which, since the fall of Communism, replaced the defunct KGB (Committee for State Security) laid the blame on Chechen warlords for the blasts; namely on Ibn al-Khattab, Shamil Basayev and Achemez Gochiyaev. None of them has thus far claimed responsibility, nor has any evidence implicating them of any involvement been presented. Russian citizens even cast doubt on the accusations levelled at Chechnya, for various reasons: Not in living memory had Chechen militias pulled off such an elaborated string of bombings, causing so much carnage. A terrorist plot on such a scale would have necessitated several months of thorough planning and preparation to put through. Hence the reason why people suspected it had been carried out by professionals. More unusual was the motive, or lack of, for Chechens to attack Russia. Chechnya’s territorial dispute with Russia predates the Soviet Union to 1858.
    [Show full text]
  • ON the EFFECTIVE USE of PROXY WARFARE by Andrew Lewis Peek Baltimore, Maryland May 2021 © 2021 Andrew Peek All Rights Reserved
    ON THE EFFECTIVE USE OF PROXY WARFARE by Andrew Lewis Peek A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland May 2021 2021 Andrew Peek All rights reserved Abstract This dissertation asks a simple question: how are states most effectively conducting proxy warfare in the modern international system? It answers this question by conducting a comparative study of the sponsorship of proxy forces. It uses process tracing to examine five cases of proxy warfare and predicts that the differentiation in support for each proxy impacts their utility. In particular, it proposes that increasing the principal-agent distance between sponsors and proxies might correlate with strategic effectiveness. That is, the less directly a proxy is supported and controlled by a sponsor, the more effective the proxy becomes. Strategic effectiveness here is conceptualized as consisting of two key parts: a proxy’s operational capability and a sponsor’s plausible deniability. These should be in inverse relation to each other: the greater and more overt a sponsor’s support is to a proxy, the more capable – better armed, better trained – its proxies should be on the battlefield. However, this close support to such proxies should also make the sponsor’s influence less deniable, and thus incur strategic costs against both it and the proxy. These costs primarily consist of external balancing by rival states, the same way such states would balance against conventional aggression. Conversely, the more deniable such support is – the more indirect and less overt – the less balancing occurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian-Speaking
    NOVEMBER 2017 ‘RUSSIAN-SPEAKING’ FIGHTERS IN SYRIA, IRAQ AND AT HOME: CONSEQUENCES AND CONTEXT FULL REPORT Mark Youngman and Dr Cerwyn Moore Centre for Russian, European and Eurasian Studies Department of Political Science and International Studies University of Birmingham This report was produced out of the Actors and Narratives programme, funded by CREST. To find out more information about this programme, and to see other outputs from the team, visit the CREST website at: https://crestresearch.ac.uk/projects/actors-and-narratives/ About the authors: Mark Youngman is an ESRC-funded doctoral student and Cerwyn Moore a Senior Lecturer in the Centre for Russian, European and Eurasian Studies at the University of Birmingham. Disclaimer: This report has been part funded by an ESRC IAA award and part funded by the Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats (ESRC Award: ES/N009614/1). It draws on the existing work of the authors, and supplements their work with original research and ongoing data collection of Russian-speaking foreign fighters.www.crestresearch.co.uk The cover image, Caucasus Emirate, is a remixed derivative ofProposed divisions of the Caucasus Emirate by ArnoldPlaton, under CC BY-SA 3.0. Caucasus Emirate is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. by R. Stevens, CREST. ©2017 CREST Creative Commons 4.0 BY-NC-SA licence. www.crestresearch.ac.uk/copyright CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................4 PART I: ASSESSING THE ‘RUSSIAN-SPEAKING’
    [Show full text]
  • Power and Plunder in Putin's Russia Miriam Lanskoy, Dylan Myles-Primakoff
    Power and Plunder in Putin's Russia Miriam Lanskoy, Dylan Myles-Primakoff Journal of Democracy, Volume 29, Number 1, January 2018, pp. 76-85 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0006 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/683637 Access provided by your local institution (13 Mar 2018 16:12 GMT) PRE created by BK on 11/20/17. The Rise of Kleptocracy POWER AND PLUNDER IN PUTIN’S RUSSIA Miriam Lanskoy and Dylan Myles-Primakoff Miriam Lanskoy is senior director for Russia and Eurasia at the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). She is the author, with Ilyas Akhmadov, of The Chechen Struggle: Independence Won and Lost (2010). Dylan Myles-Primakoff is senior program officer for Russia and Eurasia at the NED. Since Vladimir Putin rose to power in 1999, the quest to restore the might of the Russian state at home and abroad has been a hallmark of his rule. Yet another such hallmark has been rampant looting by the country’s leaders. Thus Russia has figured prominently in recent schol- arly discussions about kleptocracies—regimes distinguished by a will- ingness to prioritize defending their leaders’ mechanisms of personal enrichment over other goals of statecraft. In a kleptocracy, then, cor- ruption plays an outsized role in determining policy. But how have the state-building and great-power ambitions of the new Russian elite coex- isted with its scramble for self-enrichment? Putin’s Russia offers a vivid illustration of how kleptocratic plunder can become not only an end in itself, but also a tool for both consolidating domestic political control and projecting power abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • The Second Chechen War: the Information Component
    WARNING! The views expressed in FMSO publications and reports are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. The Second Chechen War: The Information Component by Emil Pain, Former Russian Ethno-national Relations Advisor Translated by Mr. Robert R. Love Foreign Military Studies Office, Fort Leavenworth, KS. This article appeared in The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file a Military Review July-August 2000 In December 1994 Russian authorities made their first attempt to crush Chechen separatism militarily. However, after two years of bloody combat the Russian army was forced to withdraw from the Chechen Republic. The obstinacy of the Russian authorities who had decided on a policy of victory in Chechnya resulted in the deaths of at least 30,000 Chechens and 5,000 Russian soldiers.1 This war, which caused an estimated $5.5 billion in economic damage, was largely the cause of Russia's national economic crisis in 1998, when the Russian government proved unable to service its huge debts.2 It seemed that after the 1994-1996 war Russian society and the federal government realized the ineffectiveness of using colonial approaches to resolve ethnopolitical issues.3 They also understood, it seemed, the impossibility of forcibly imposing their will upon even a small ethnoterritorial community if a significant portion of that community is prepared to take up arms to defend its interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Caucasian Review of International Affairs (CRIA) Is a Quarterly Peer-Reviewed, Non- Profit and Only-Online Academic Journal Based in Germany
    CCCAUCASIAN REVIEW OF IIINTERNATIONAL AAAFFAIRS Vol. 4 (((3(333)))) sssummersummer 2020201020 101010 EU DEMOCRACY PROMOTION THROUGH CONDITIONALITY IN ITS NEIGHBOURHOOD JANINE REINHARD EU ENGAGEMENT IN CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN GEORGIA : TOWARDS A MORE PROACTIVE ROLE MEHMET BARDAKÇI RELIGION AND ITS IMPORTANCE IN INTERNATIONAL POLITICS : A CASE STUDY OF 2008 RUSSIAN -GEORGIAN WAR INES -JACQUELINE WERKNER FROM RACKETEER TO EMIR : A POLITICAL PORTRAIT OF DOKU UMAROV , RUSSIA ’S MOST WANTED MAN KEVIN DANIEL LEAHY THE CRISIS OF GAZPROM AS THE CRISIS OF RUSSIA ’S “E NERGY SUPER -STATE ” POLICY TOWARDS EUROPE AND THE FORMER SOVIET UNION ANDREY KAZANTSEV EURASIAN BARGAINING , AGRICULTURE , AND THE DOHA ROUND SARITA D. JACKSON WAS KOSOVO ’S SPLIT -OFF LEGITIMATE ? BACKGROUND , MEANING AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE ICJ’ S ADVISORY OPINION HEIKO KRUEGER UKRAINE : A CHALLENGE FOR U.S., EU & NATO REGIONAL POLICY TAMERLAN VAHABOV ISSN: 1865-6773 www.cria -online.org EDITORIAL BOARD: Dr. Tracey German (King’s College Dr. Robin van der Hout (Europa-Institute, London, United Kingdom) University of Saarland, Germany) Dr. Andrew Liaropoulos (Institute for Dr. Jason Strakes (Analyst, Research European and American Studies, Greece) Reachback Center East, U.S.) Dr. Martin Malek (National Defence Dr. Cory Welt (George Washington Academy, Austria) University, U.S.) INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD: Prof. Hüseyin Bagci , Middle East Prof. Werner Münch , former Prime Technical University, Ankara, Turkey Minister of Saxony-Anhalt, former Member of the European Parliament, Germany Prof. Hans-Georg Heinrich, University of Vienna, Austria Prof. Elkhan Nuriyev , Director of the Centre for Strategic Studies under the Prof. Edmund Herzig , Oxford University, President of the Republic of Azerbaijan UK Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Kadyrovism: Hardline Islam As a Tool of the Kremlin?
    Notes de l’Ifri Russie.Nei.Visions 99 Kadyrovism: Hardline Islam as a Tool of the Kremlin? Marlène LARUELLE March 2017 Russia/NIS Center The Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental, non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the few French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European and broader international debate. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. This text is published with the support of DGRIS (Directorate General for International Relations and Strategy) under “Observatoire Russie, Europe orientale et Caucase”. ISBN: 978-2-36567-681-6 © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2017 How to quote this document: Marlène Laruelle, “Kadyrovism: Hardline Islam as a Tool of the Kremlin?”, Russie.Nei.Visions, No. 99, Ifri, March 2017. Ifri 27 rue de la Procession 75740 Paris Cedex 15—FRANCE Tel.: +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00—Fax : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 Email: [email protected] Ifri-Bruxelles Rue Marie-Thérèse, 21 1000—Brussels—BELGIUM Tel.: +32 (0)2 238 51 10—Fax: +32 (0)2 238 51 15 Email: [email protected] Website: Ifri.org Russie.Nei.Visions Russie.Nei.Visions is an online collection dedicated to Russia and the other new independent states (Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan).
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    ETHNIC WAR AND PEACE IN POST-SOVIET EURASIA By SCOTT GRANT FEINSTEIN A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2016 © 2016 Scott Grant Feinstein To my Mom and Dad ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In the course of completing this monograph I benefited enormously from the generosity of others. To my committee chair, Benjamin B. Smith, I express my sincere appreciation for his encouragement and guidance. Ben not only taught me to systematically research political phenomena, but also the importance of pursuing a complete and parsimonious explanation. Throughout my doctoral studies Ben remained dedicated to me and my research, and with his incredible patience he tolerated and motivated my winding intellectual path. I thank my committee co-chair, Michael Bernhard, for his hours spent reading early manuscript drafts, support in pursuing a multi-country project, and detailed attention to clear writing. Michael’s appreciation of my dissertation vision and capacity gave this research project its legs. Ben and Michael provided me exceptionally valuable advice. I am also indebted to the help provided by my other committee members – Conor O’Dwyer, Ingrid Kleespies and Beth Rosenson – who inspired creativity and scientific rigor, always provided thoughtful and useful comments, and kept me searching for the big picture. Among institutions, I wish to gratefully acknowledge the support of the Center of European Studies at the University of Florida, IIE Fulbright Foundation, the American Council of Learned Societies, the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, IREX, the American Councils, and the Department of Political Science at the University of Florida.
    [Show full text]