University of Warwick Institutional Repository

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

University of Warwick Institutional Repository University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/4519 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. An Audience with the Queen: Subversion, Submission and Survival in Three Late Elizabethan Progress Entertainments By Birgit Oehle,MA PhD in RenaissanceStudies The University of Warwick The Centrefor the Study of the Renaissance July 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements Declaration Summary List of Abbreviations INTRODUCTION 1-10 I. The Elizabethan Progress 11-23 I. I The 1591 Progress 23-27 1.2 The 1602Progress 27-29 II. The Historical-Political Context H. 1 The Two Reigns of Elizabeth 30-40 11.2 The Year 1591 40-44 III. Viscount Montague, the Sussex Community and Catholicism 45-71 IV. The Cowdray Entertainmentof 1591 IV. 1 Cowdray Park 72-80 80-83 N. 2 The Background to the Entertainment - Deja vu? IV. 3 The Cowdray Entertainment as an Event 84-85 IV. 3.1 The Loyalty Reading 86-88 N. 3.2 Other Readings 88-112 V. The Aftermath of the Cowdray Entertainment 113-122 VI. The Earl of Hertford and the Succession Debate 123-146 VII. The Elvetham Entertainment of September 1591 VII. 1 The Entertainment Text 147-151 VII. 2 An Introduction to the Entertainment 151-156 VII. 3 The Entertainment as an Event 157-159 VIII. 3. I The Hertford Family -- Suitable Candidates for the Succession 159-178 VHI. 3.2 The Iconographyand SexualPolitics of the Elvetham Entertainment 179-197 VIII. The Aftermath of the Elvetham Entertainment 198-208 IX. The Harefield Entertainment of July 1602 209 IX. 1 Sir Thomas Egerton -- Career Politician 210-216 IX. 2 Harefield Place 217 IX. 3 The Entertainment Text(s) 217-221 IX. 4 An Introduction to the Entertainment 222-226 X. The Harefield Entertainment-A Transcription of the Text 227-243 XI. The Entertainment as an Event 244-260 CONCLUSION 261-262 APPENDIX I 263-271 APPENDIX II 272 BIBLIOGRAPHY 273-291 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS All illustrations can be found in Appendix H. The Progress of 1591 Illustration 1: Cowdray Park 2 Illustrations and 3: Cowdray - The Courtyard Illustration 4: Cowdray -- The Buck Hall The Hertfords and the Succession Illustration 5: Elvetham -- The Crescent-Shaped Lake Illustration 6: The Hertford Coat of Arms Illustration 7: The Rainbow Portrait For Brian, with love Thoughfor myself alone I would not be ambitious in my wish To wish myself much better, yet for you I would be trebled twenty times myself. (TheMerchant of Venice,111.2.150-53) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis has taken somewhat longer to complete than anticipated, and I must thank my friends and family who have never lost faith in me. I sincerely hope they will not be disappointed. Amongst the people who have helped me in their professional capacity, my thanks are due first and foremost to Professor Ronnie Mulryne. He was never an intrusive supervisor and left me to my own devices much of the time. However, he did impart enthusisam and encouragement in generous measure, reading drafts and redrafts, and always criticized my efforts constructively. Our meetings invariably gave me the reassurance for which I was looking, and any doubts -voiced and unvoiced- were usually swiftly dispelled. My thanks also go to Dr Peter Marshall from the Department of History at the University of Warwick, who very kindly agreed to read the first draft of the chapter on Catholicism, and who made some very helpful suggestions for further reading. I am grateful to Mr Timothy McCann of West Sussex County Record Office, who pointed me in the right direction where Viscount Montague and Elizabethan Sussex were concerned, and the staff at Warwick County Record Office who were most helpful and friendly. A big thank you goesto SamPimlott for her friendship and tremendoussupport over the years. Surprisingly, she never gets tired of listening to me go on about Queen Elizabeth, and she invariably asksall the right questions.Most importantly, Sam can always be relied upon to `put the world to rights' over a glass of cider, whatever happens. Last, but certainly not least, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Alice, who has kept me sane (I think), and to Brian Ody. He has been, and I hope will continue to be, my harshest critic and my greatest fan. He decided long ago that he would become the spur to prick the side of mine intent, if he felt that a spur was what was required. Needless to say, we do not always agree on this point. He has listened patiently over a long time, first to vague ideas, then to drafts. More than once he has thrown up his hands in horror when I unearthed yet another piece of information that I felt just had to be included in a chapter that was supposedly long completed. For his support and encouragement over the years I am intensely grateful. Brian asked specifically not to be mentioned in the Acknowledgements, but since I never do as he tells me (as he keeps complaining), I shall say thank you anyway. Warwick, July 1999 DECLARATION All the material submitted in this thesis is new and has not been used before. However, Chapter H is based on work completed for an MA dissertation written in 1992. Although a substantial part of the research carried out for this thesis builds on previous work, the eleven chapters, or parts thereof, submitted here have not appearedin print before. SUMMARY Three late Elizabethan progress entertainments are being discussed: Cowdray (August 1591), Elvetham (September 1591), and Harefield (July 1602). The Elvetham entertainmenthas received some critical attention and is comparatively well known due to the extraordinarypreparations undertaken for the royal visit, and the fact that a woodcut of an artificial crescent-shaped,lake especially dug for the occasion, has survived. The other two entertainments have been somewhat neglected, and Harefield survives only in fragmentaryform. To my knowledge, its text has never been printed in toto, and the thesis will include a transcript of the original manuscripthoused in Warwickshire County Record Office. The traditional view that progress entertainments were pastoral tales whose main purpose was to consolidate and confirm existing class structures is challenged. Entertainments are rather complex fictions that serve not merely to establish and preservethe `beautiful relation' between Queen and her subjects,highborn as well as lowly. Theseoccasions were also very much sites for the exerciseof power, by monarch and hosts alike. When examining these festivities in their historical and political contextsand illuminating their hosts' backgrounds,significant new interpretations,or at least possible alternative readings,may be found. Most importantly, the entertainments have to be viewed holistically, as eventsrather than as the texts that have come down to us. The hosts of the first two entertainments were powerful peers who were politically suspect from the regime's point of view. Both these lords, on the other hand, had little reason to love the regime because they had been harassed. Despite this state of affairs, traditional interpretations still maintain that both entertainments were submissive in tenor; that their hosts regarded the royal visit as an honour, and tried to (re)gain the Queen's favour through the spectacles that they were putting on. I would claim that these pageants are far more complex affairs and have to be read on different levels of signification. Far from being submissive, these fetes can be interpreted as challenging the existing order, if not indeed actively trying to subvert it. Having said that, there are country welcomes that seem to conform to the more traditional view of progress entertainments. The third pageant at Harefield was offered by a top-ranking Elizabethan official whose relationship with the Queen was presumably more amicable. Her visit to him was probably intended as a sign of favour, and his motivation in hosting the entertainment may well have been the consolidation of his own position within her close circle of councillors. He would have aimed at maintaining the existing order rather than challenge it; at establishing a `beautiful relation' between all classes. These conclusions can only be drawn, however, once the event as a whole has been studied as well as the surviving fragments of text. List of Abbreviations Add. Addenda (to Calendar of State Papers) AHR American Historical Review APC Acts of the Privy Council BIHR Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research BL British Library CJH Canadian Journal of History CQ Critical Quarterly CSPD Calendarof StatePapers Domestic CSP Span. Calendarof StatePapers, Spanish DNB Dictionary of National Biography EHR English Historical Review ELH English Literary History ELR English Literary Renaissance HJ Historical Journal HLQ Huntington Library Quarterly HLRO House of Lords Record Office HMC Historical Manuscripts Commission HT History Today JEH Journal of EcclesiasticalHistory JHI Journal of the History of Ideas JMRS Journal of Medieval and RenaissanceStudies L&A List and Analysis of StatePapers, Foreign, Elizabeth MP Modern Philology N&Q Notes and Queries OED Oxford English Dictionary P&P Past and Present PMLA Publicationsof the Modern LanguageAssociation PRO Public Record Office RecH Recusant History RenD Renaissance Drama Rep. Representations RES Review of English Studies RORD Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama RQ Renaissance Quarterly SAQ South Atlantic Quarterly SCJ Sixteenth Century Journal SEL Studies in English Literature ShQ ShakespeareQuarterly SP StatePapers, Domestic, Elizabeth (in the Public Record Office) Suss.Arch.
Recommended publications
  • The Original Lists of Persons of Quality, Emigrants, Religious Exiles, Political
    Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924096785278 In compliance with current copyright law, Cornell University Library produced this replacement volume on paper that meets the ANSI Standard Z39.48-1992 to replace the irreparably deteriorated original. 2003 H^^r-h- CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND GIVEN IN 1891 BY HENRY WILLIAMS SAGE : ; rigmal ^ist0 OF PERSONS OF QUALITY; EMIGRANTS ; RELIGIOUS EXILES ; POLITICAL REBELS SERVING MEN SOLD FOR A TERM OF YEARS ; APPRENTICES CHILDREN STOLEN; MAIDENS PRESSED; AND OTHERS WHO WENT FROM GREAT BRITAIN TO THE AMERICAN PLANTATIONS 1600- I 700. WITH THEIR AGES, THE LOCALITIES WHERE THEY FORMERLY LIVED IN THE MOTHER COUNTRY, THE NAMES OF THE SHIPS IN WHICH THEY EMBARKED, AND OTHER INTERESTING PARTICULARS. FROM MSS. PRESERVED IN THE STATE PAPER DEPARTMENT OF HER MAJESTY'S PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE, ENGLAND. EDITED BY JOHN CAMDEN HOTTEN. L n D n CHATTO AND WINDUS, PUBLISHERS. 1874, THE ORIGINAL LISTS. 1o ihi ^zmhcxs of the GENEALOGICAL AND HISTORICAL SOCIETIES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THIS COLLECTION OF THE NAMES OF THE EMIGRANT ANCESTORS OF MANY THOUSANDS OF AMERICAN FAMILIES, IS RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED PY THE EDITOR, JOHN CAMDEN HOTTEN. CONTENTS. Register of the Names of all the Passengers from London during One Whole Year, ending Christmas, 1635 33, HS 1 the Ship Bonavatture via CONTENTS. In the Ship Defence.. E. Bostocke, Master 89, 91, 98, 99, 100, loi, 105, lo6 Blessing .
    [Show full text]
  • Bonfire Night
    Bonfire Night What Is Bonfire Night? Bonfire Night remembers the failed attempt to kill the King of England and the important people of England as they gathered for the State Opening of Parliament on 5th November 1605. Bonfires were lit that first night in a joyful celebration of the King being saved. As the years went by, the burning of straw dummies representing Guy Fawkes was a reminder that traitors would never successfully overthrow a king. The Gunpowder Plot After Queen Elizabeth I died in 1603, the English Catholics were led to believe that the Act of terrorism: new King, James I, would be more accepting Deliberate attempt to kill of them. However, he was no more welcoming or injure many innocent of Catholic people than the previous ruler people for religious or which led some people to wish he was off the political gain. throne to allow a Catholic to rule the country. A small group of Catholic men met to discuss what could be done and their leader, Robert Catesby, was keen to take violent action. Their plan was to blow up the Houses of Parliament, killing many important people who they did not agree with. This was an act of terrorism. They planned to kill all of the leaders who were making life difficult for the Catholic people. They recruited a further eight men to help with the plot but as it took form, some of the group realised that many innocent people would be killed, including some who supported the Catholic people. This led some of the men to begin to have doubts about the whole plot.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gunpowder Plot Activity Pack
    TTHHEE GGUUNNPPOOWWDDEERR PPLLOOTT The Gunpowder Plot Activity Pack Welcome to Heritage Doncaster’s the Gunpowder Plot activity pack. This booklet is filled with ideas that you can have a go at as a family at home whilst learning about the Gunpowder Plot. Some of these activities will require adult supervision as they require using an oven, a sharp implement, or could just be a bit tricky these have been marked with this warning triangle. We would love to see what you create so why not share your photos with us on social media or email You can find us at @doncastermuseum @DoncasterMuseum [email protected] Have Fun! Heritage Doncaster Education Service Contents What was the Gunpower Plot? Page 3 The Plotters Page 4 Plotters Top Trumps Page 5-6 Remember, remember Page 7 Acrostic poem Page 8 Tunnels Page 9 Build a tunnel Page 10 Mysterious letter Page 11 Letter writing Page 12 Escape and capture Page 13 Wanted! Page 14 Create a boardgame Page 15 Guy Fawkes Night Page 16 Firework art Page 17-18 Rocket experiment Page 19 Penny for a Guy Page 20 Sew your own Guy Page 21 Traditional Bonfire Night food Page 22 Chocolate covered apples Page 23 Wordsearch Page 24 What was the Gunpowder Plot? The Gunpowder Plot was a plan made by thirteen men to blow up the Houses of Parliament when King James I was inside. The Houses of Parliament is an important building in London where the government meet. It is made up of the House of Lords and the House of Commons.
    [Show full text]
  • Trinityevents
    Trinityevents April 2, 2017 Welcome to Trinity Church Whether you have worshiped here for years or are visiting our Episcopal Church for the first time, we are glad you are with us. We invite all to enter fully into worship and to explore the variety of learning, small group, and service opportunities that are part of our life together. To learn more, visit trinitychurchboston.org and click on For Newcomers or contact Mark Kharas, at [email protected], 617-536-0944 x360. We hope to know you better in the time ahead. Today Fifth Sunday in Lent Welcome To Dean June Osborne: Guest Preacher & Forum Speaker Sun., April 2 • Guest Preacher: 9 & 11:15 a.m. • Forum Speaker: 10:15 a.m. Today we welcome as Guest Preacher in our morning services an important leader in the Church of England today, the Very Rev. June Osborne, Dean of Salisbury Cathedral. Dean Osborne has been a significant voice in the Church of England addressing major issues, among them the ordination of women and controversies over consecrating gay and lesbian bishops. The London Times attributed to Dean Osborne’s speech in the Church’s Synod the “swinging of the General Synod vote in favor of female priests.” Dean Osborne presides over one of England’s most cherished places of worship. With its narrow, graceful spire, the tallest in England, rising from the vivid green lawn of the cloister, author and travel writer Bill Bryson declares that “there is no doubt in my mind that Salisbury Cathedral is the single most beautiful structure in England and the close around it the most beautiful space.” Chat with a Vestry Member Today, 10:15-11 a.m.,Angel Room • 12:15-1 p.m., Parish House LL-A • 7:10-7:50 p.m., Commons Join a few members of the Vestry for coffee and informal conversation about what’s currently going on in the parish.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 396 September 2006
    Registered Charity No: 272098 ISSN 0585-9980 SURREY ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY CASTLE ARCH, GUILDFORD GUI 3SX Tel/ Fax: 01483 532454 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.surreyarohaeology.org.uk Bulletin 396 September 2006 STONE AGE SUMMER: Piers Chandler showing how to stretch leather WOLVES, FLINTS AND FUR Best-selling author Michelle Paver visits Surrey History Centre Visitors to the Surrey History Centre travelled back in time 6000 years on Saturday 22nd July when Stone Age Summer was launched in spectacular style with best selling children's author Michelle Paver. She dropped in to talk about her books, Wolf Brother and Spirit Walker, which d e s c r i b e t h e a d v e n t u r e s o f To r a k , a y o u n g S t o n e A g e b o y, h i s w o l f companion and their fight for survival. Michelle described how she travelled to Greenland to live with the Inuit, and to t h e f r o z e n f o r e s t s o f F i n l a n d t o scavenge for food to research her stories. She told an avid audience that although the Stone Age had been a childhood passion of hers, it had taken a near death experience with a Canadian bear to make her change careers as a top lawyer to become a full time writer. Perhaps that's why the bear in Wolf Allan Course, Michelle Paver and Piers S r o f h e r i s s o m e n a c i n g i C h a n d l e r To help create a Stone Age feel on the day, Michelle was joined by flint knapper Allan Course, and leather worker Piers Chandler.
    [Show full text]
  • WRAP THESIS Shilliam 1986.Pdf
    University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/34806 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. FOREIGN INFLUENCES ON AND INNOVATION IN ENGLISH TOMB SCULPTURE IN THE FIRST HALF OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY by Nicola Jane Shilliam B.A. (Warwick) Ph.D. dissertation Warwick University History of Art September 1986 SUMMARY This study is an investigation of stylistic and iconographic innovation in English tomb sculpture from the accession of King Henry VIII through the first half of the sixteenth century, a period during which Tudor society and Tudor art were in transition as a result of greater interaction with continental Europe. The form of the tomb was moulded by contemporary cultural, temporal and spiritual innovations, as well as by the force of artistic personalities and the directives of patrons. Conversely, tomb sculpture is an inherently conservative art, and old traditions and practices were resistant to innovation. The early chapters examine different means of change as illustrated by a particular group of tombs. The most direct innovations were introduced by the royal tombs by Pietro Torrigiano in Westminster Abbey. The function of Italian merchants in England as intermediaries between Italian artists and English patrons is considered. Italian artists also introduced terracotta to England.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019- 2020 December
    Recent books and articles added to the Library stock arranged by subject; December 2019 to March 2020 Archaeology Council for British Archaeology February 2020 Communication and participation in archaeology survey 2020: the results! Obituaries British Archaeology 171, 2020 Requiem, compiled by Mike Pitts, 52--55 (includes John Hampton, vice-president of Surrey Archaeological Society who died in October 2019 aged 97) Egham-by-Runnymede Historical Society Newsletter 555, 2020 Donald (Don) Mummery – an appreciation, by Richard Williams, 5 (Obituary: lived in Englefield Green) Medieval Pottery Research Group Newsletter 83, 2016 Phil Jones, by Lorraine Mepham, 1 (obituary) Surrey Archaeological Society Bulletin 477, 2019 John Hampton OBE FSA, by David Bird, 21--2 (obituary) Biographies Around & About Horsley 247, 2019 Sir Henry Enfield Roscoe at Woodcote Lodge, by June Davey, 21--5 (Surrey People; 1890s) Egham-by-Runnymede Historical Society Newsletter 557, 2020 A brief history of Albert Buske, by his granddaughter Carole Spurdon, 4--5 (born in 1877 and resident in Englefield Green) Farnham & District Museum Society Journal 19.1, 2020 A Farnham character – George Baxter, by Cyril Trust, 12--13 (20th century) Gardens Trust News 11, 2019 Mavis Batey and Oxford, by David Lambert, 17--19 (lived in Farnham in 1950s and was part of the campaign to save Painshill Park) Kenley Common Newsletter February, 2020 Paul Farnes DFM, AE (16th July, 1918 – 28th January, 2020), by David Meanwell, 2 and insert 1, (oral history transcript) Leatherhead & District
    [Show full text]
  • E Names of Those Persons Who Subscribed Towards the Efence Of
    E N A M ES o f tho se Pe rso n s w ho s ub s crib ed to w ards the efen ce o f this Co un try at the time the SPA N ISH A RM A DA 1 8 8 , 5 , the amo unt d s each co n trib ute . ' VI TH H I STO RI CA L I N TROD UCTI ON C B E " A N D N D X T. N O L E . , I . PHO TO CO PIED BY PRESERVATIO N flonbo n AL F RED RU SSEL L SM ITH, 6 H O O UAR . 3 , S SQ E R DUCTIO N INT O . all th e n o f F the reigns of Sovereigns of E gland , that th e u Qu een Elizabeth is undoubtedly most momento s . The manners and customs, progresses and pageantry of that half century of English history the remarkable men and W0 ’ Who co n tinfio us s men lived in it the succession of eventful matter , not only of domestic, but political import , have caused the sove reignty of Elizabeth Tudor to be made the study of all class es of An d society, historians and critics . certainly the most noteworthy a u incident, the most momentous event in the annals of co ntry, was the invasion of England by the Spanish Fleet in the year of 1 5 88 . I n o t r our Lord, do pretend to write at large the histo y of the Rise and Fall of the Spanish Armada but presume to give in as short an essay as possible, so complete a collection of notes upon the subj ect as could be gathered from the contemporary records of the period, now preserved in various depositories , u Oth M especially our P blic Record ee and the British useum , W n o twith here the Burleigh State Papers are to be seen.
    [Show full text]
  • FOLGER MS L.B.425 1 ______
    FOLGER MS L.b.425 1 ________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY The document below contains notes made by Sir William More (1520- 1600) of Loseley on the lease of his house in the Blackfriars. According to the notes, More leased the house at the request of Sir Henry Neville (c.1520–1593) to Richard Farrant (d.1580), who converted the premises into a playhouse for the Children of the Chapel. Farrant also sublet part of the premises, for which infraction More claimed Farrant had forfeited his lease, but before More could regain possession, Farrant died, leaving the lease in his will to his widow, Anne, the daughter of Richard Bower (d.1561), Master of the Choristers of the Chapel Royal. For the will of Richard Farrant, dated 30 November 1580 and proved 1 March 1581, see TNA PROB 11/63, f. 67. After her husband’s death, and intervention by Leicester with Sir William More on behalf of William Hunnis (d.1597), Master of the Children of the Chapel, Anne Farrant sublet the premises to Hunnis and John Newman on 20 December 1581, who later transferred their interest to Henry Evans. Evans sold his sublease to Oxford, who granted it to his servant, John Lyly (1554–1606). More brought suit against Evans, and was granted possession of the property in Easter term 1584, and the first Blackfriars theatre was closed. See Smith, Irwin, Shakespeare’s Blackfriars Playhouse (New York University Press, 1964), pp. 148-52, 467-8. The final phase of the dispute is described by Smith at pp. 151-2: Under these troublous circumstances a new company of boys was formed, with Henry Evans as manager, John Lyly as dramatist and proprietor of the playhouse, and the Earl of Oxford as patron.
    [Show full text]
  • Report To: Housing & City Support
    Agenda Item 09 Report PC20/21-01 Report to Planning Committee Date 9 July 2020 By Director of Planning Local Authority Chichester District Council Application Number SDNP/20/01693/FUL Applicant Mr Mike Ruddock Application Construction of 12 treehouses to provide tourism accommodation across 2 woodland sites within the estate (5 x 1 bedroom units at Lodge Wood and 7 x 1 bedroom units at High Field Copse), access and parking, cycle storage, drainage and biodiversity enhancements and woodland management. Address Cowdray Park, A272 Easebourne St to Heath End Lane, Easebourne, West Sussex Recommendation: That planning permission be granted subject to the conditions set out in paragraph 10.1 of the report. Executive Summary The applicant seeks permission for the erection of 12 treehouses across two woodland sites within the Cowdray Estate to provide sustainable tourist accommodation within close proximity of Midhurst and public rights of way. The application follows the refusal of a previous scheme for 10 treehouses on one of the proposed sites (Lodge Wood) due to the size and scale of development and the harm deriving from the imposition of a suburban form of development on the historic woodland character; and associated impacts on biodiversity and priority habitat (see committee report and meeting minutes appended at Appendices 2 and 3). The current scheme has been subject to collaborative working between the applicant’s design team and specialist officers and as a result is considered to be a fully landscape-led proposal. The scheme would conserve and enhance the unique heritage, woodland and ecological character of each site, whilst also accruing significant benefits that would align with the Second Purpose and Duty of the National Park, including the provision of tourist accommodation, opportunities for the understanding and enjoyment of the National Park’s special qualities, and benefitting the local economy.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Gunpowder Plot & Guy Fawkes Night Four Hundred Years Ago, in 1605, a Man Called Guy Fawkes and a Group Of
    History of the Gunpowder Plot & Guy Fawkes Night Four hundred years ago, in 1605, a man called Guy Fawkes and a group of plotters attempted to blow up the Houses of Parliament in London with barrels of gunpowder placed in the basement. They wanted to kill King James and the king’s leaders. Houses of Parliament, London Why did Guy Fawkes want to kill King James 1st and the king’s leaders? When Queen Elizabeth 1st took the throne of England she made some laws against the Roman Catholics. Guy Fawkes was one of a small group of Catholics who felt that the government was treating Roman Catholics unfairly. They hoped that King James 1st would change the laws, but he didn't. Catholics had to practise their religion in secret. There were even fines for people who didn't attend the Protestant church on Sunday or on holy days. James lst passed more laws against the Catholics when he became king. What happened - the Gunpowder Plot A group of men led by Robert Catesby, plotted to kill King James and blow up the Houses of Parliament, the place where the laws that governed England were made. Guy Fawkes was one of a group of men The plot was simple - the next time Parliament was opened by King James l, they would blow up everyone there with gunpowder. The men bought a house next door to the parliament building. The house had a cellar which went under the parliament building. They planned to put gunpowder under the house and blow up parliament and the king.
    [Show full text]
  • Huguenot Merchants Settled in England 1644 Who Purchased Lincolnshire Estates in the 18Th Century, and Acquired Ayscough Estates by Marriage
    List of Parliamentary Families 51 Boucherett Origins: Huguenot merchants settled in England 1644 who purchased Lincolnshire estates in the 18th century, and acquired Ayscough estates by marriage. 1. Ayscough Boucherett – Great Grimsby 1796-1803 Seats: Stallingborough Hall, Lincolnshire (acq. by mar. c. 1700, sales from 1789, demolished first half 19th c.); Willingham Hall (House), Lincolnshire (acq. 18th c., built 1790, demolished c. 1962) Estates: Bateman 5834 (E) 7823; wealth in 1905 £38,500. Notes: Family extinct 1905 upon the death of Jessie Boucherett (in ODNB). BABINGTON Origins: Landowners at Bavington, Northumberland by 1274. William Babington had a spectacular legal career, Chief Justice of Common Pleas 1423-36. (Payling, Political Society in Lancastrian England, 36-39) Five MPs between 1399 and 1536, several kts of the shire. 1. Matthew Babington – Leicestershire 1660 2. Thomas Babington – Leicester 1685-87 1689-90 3. Philip Babington – Berwick-on-Tweed 1689-90 4. Thomas Babington – Leicester 1800-18 Seat: Rothley Temple (Temple Hall), Leicestershire (medieval, purch. c. 1550 and add. 1565, sold 1845, remod. later 19th c., hotel) Estates: Worth £2,000 pa in 1776. Notes: Four members of the family in ODNB. BACON [Frank] Bacon Origins: The first Bacon of note was son of a sheepreeve, although ancestors were recorded as early as 1286. He was a lawyer, MP 1542, Lord Keeper of the Great Seal 1558. Estates were purchased at the Dissolution. His brother was a London merchant. Eldest son created the first baronet 1611. Younger son Lord Chancellor 1618, created a viscount 1621. Eight further MPs in the 16th and 17th centuries, including kts of the shire for Norfolk and Suffolk.
    [Show full text]