GS 1708-09Y GENERAL SYNOD DRAFT BISHOPS AND PRIESTS (CONSECRATION AND ORDINATION OF WOMEN) MEASURE DRAFT AMENDING CANON No. 30 ILLUSTRATIVE DRAFT CODE OF PRACTICE REVISION COMMITTEE Chair: The Ven Clive Mansell (Rochester) Ex officio members (Steering Committee): The Rt Revd Nigel McCulloch, (Bishop of Manchester) (Chair) The Very Revd Vivienne Faull (Dean of Leicester) Dr Paula Gooder (Birmingham) The Ven Ian Jagger (Durham) (from 26 September 2009) The Ven Alastair Magowan (Salisbury) (until 25 September 2009) The Revd Canon Anne Stevens (Southwark) Mrs Margaret Swinson (Liverpool) Mr Geoffrey Tattersall QC (Manchester) The Rt Revd Trevor Willmott (Bishop of Dover) Appointed members: Mrs April Alexander (Southwark) Mrs Lorna Ashworth (Chichester) The Revd Dr Jonathan Baker (Oxford) The Rt Revd Pete Broadbent (Southern Suffragans) The Ven Christine Hardman (Southwark) The Revd Canon Dr Alan Hargrave (Ely) The Rt Revd Martyn Jarrett (Northern Suffragans) The Revd Canon Simon Killwick (Manchester) The Revd Angus MacLeay (Rochester) Mrs Caroline Spencer (Canterbury) Consultants: Diocesan Secretaries: Mrs Jane Easton (Diocesan Secretary of Leicester) Diocesan Registrars: Mr Lionel Lennox (Diocesan Registrar of York) The Revd Canon John Rees (Diocesan Registrar of Oxford) 1 CONTENTS Page Number Glossary 3 Preface 5 Part 1: How the journey began 8 Part 2: How the journey unfolded 15 Part 3: How the journey was completed – the Committee‟s clause by clause consideration of the draft legislation A. The draft Bishops and Priests (Consecration and Ordination of Women) Measure 32 B. Draft Amending Canon No. 30 69 Part 4: Signposts for what lies ahead 77 Appendix 1: Proposals for amendment and submissions 83 Appendix 2: Summary of proposals and submissions received which raised points of substance and the Committee‟s consideration thereof Part 1. The draft Bishops and Priests (Consecration and Ordination of Women) Measure 91 Part 2. Draft Amending Canon No. 30 114 Appendix 3: Destination tables 118 Appendix 4: The society model – supplementary analysis 121 Appendix 5: Transfer by operation of law – supplementary analysis 128 Appendix 6: The Code of Practice to be made under the Measure 135 2 GLOSSARY In this Report: ‘the Act of Synod’ means the Episcopal Ministry Act of Synod 1993; ‘the CDM’ means the Clergy Discipline Measure 2003; ‘the draft Amending Canon’ means draft Amending Canon No. 30 (GS 1710) in the form in which it received First Consideration by the General Synod in February 2009; ‘the revised draft Amending Canon’ means the Amending Canon as revised by the Committee; ‘the draft Measure’ means the draft Bishops and Priests (Consecration and Ordination of Women) Measure (GS 1708) in the form in which it received First Consideration by the General Synod in February 2009; ‘the revised draft Measure’ means the draft Measure in the form in which it has been amended by the Revision Committee; ‘the 1986 Measure’ means the Patronage (Benefices) Measure 1986; ‘the 1993 Measure’ means the Priests (Ordination of Women) Measure 1993; ‘the financial provisions Measure’ means the Ordination of Women (Financial Provisions) Measure 1993; ‘the illustrative draft Code’ means the illustrative draft Code of Practice (GS 1710) prepared by the Legislative Drafting Group and circulated to the General Synod in February 2009; ‘the Legislative Drafting Group’ means the drafting group established by the Archbishops‟ Council to prepare draft legislation in accordance with the General Synod‟s resolution of July 2006; ‘Letter of Request‟ means a Letter of Request issued by a parochial church council under clause 3(1) of the revised draft Measure; ‘Letter of Request during a Vacancy’ means a Letter of Request during a Vacancy issued by a parochial church council under clause 3(3) of the revised draft Measure; ‘PCC’ means a parochial church council; ‘PEV’ means a provincial episcopal visitor appointed under section 5 of the Act of Synod; ‘Resolutions A and B’ means the resolutions for which provision is made under s.3 of, and Schedule 1 to, the 1993 Measure; ‘TEA’ means transferred episcopal arrangements of the kind proposed in the Report of the Working Group of the House of Bishops chaired by the Bishop of Guildford (GS 1605); ‘the transfer / vesting model’ means arrangements under which certain episcopal functions are transferred by operation of law (as opposed to being undertaken by way of delegation) from the diocesan bishop to another bishop so as to be exercisable by the latter bishop; 3 ‘the simplest possible legislation’ means legislation confined to that necessary to allow the consecration of women to the episcopate, with any provision for those conscientiously unable to receive the episcopal ministry of women being made outside the terms of the legislation (e.g. in a non-statutory Code of Practice); and ‘the society model’ means arrangements under which certain episcopal functions are exercised by a bishop who is a member of a society comprising those who are unable on grounds of theological conviction to receive the episcopal ministry of women. 4 PREFACE 1. The draft Bishops and Priests (Consecration and Ordination of Women) Measure („the draft Measure‟) and draft Amending Canon No. 30 („the draft Amending Canon‟) both received First Consideration by the General Synod („the Synod‟) at the February 2009 group of sessions. 2. In addition to proposals from the Steering Committee and from individual members of the Revision Committee („the Committee‟), proposals for amendments submitted in accordance with Standing Order 53(a) were received in time from the individual members of the Synod listed in Part A of Appendix 1 and from the groups of members listed in Part B of Appendix 1. Submissions were received, out of time, from those Synod members listed in Part C of Appendix 11. Submissions were also received from the groups consisting of both Synod members and non-members listed in Part D of Appendix 1 and from the non-Synod members and bodies listed in Part E of Appendix 1. 3. All those who attended and addressed the Committee are identified in Parts A to D of Appendix 1. 4. The Committee met on 16 occasions between 1 May 2009 and 30 April 2010 for 15 full day meetings and one two day meeting. The decisions made by the Committee were agreed nem con, except where indicated otherwise. 5. The amendments agreed by the Committee to give effect to the proposals that it accepted are shown in the revised draft Measure and the revised draft Amending Canon (GS 1708A and 1709A) now returned to the Synod. As required by Standing Order 54(b), Appendix 2 contains a summary of the proposals received which raised points of substance and of the Committee‟s consideration of them. Appendix 3 contains a destination table relating the provisions of the draft legislation in the form in which it received First Consideration to those of the draft legislation in the form in which it is now returned to the Synod. 6. The Legislative Drafting Group had prepared an illustrative draft Code of Practice („the illustrative draft Code‟) which was provided to the Synod (as GS 1710) alongside the draft Measure and the draft Amending Canon. The illustrative draft Code is not subject to the formal legislative process at this stage. The responsibility for drawing up the Code of Practice for which provision is made in the revised draft Measure will rest with the House of Bishops and the House will not be able to make the Code, which will require Synodical approval, unless and until the revised draft Measure has become law. 7. It is, however, the Committee’s view that further work should be done on a draft Code of Practice before the revised draft Measure and the revised draft 1 Even though their submissions were received out of time, the Committee agreed to consider, and to invite the Rt Worshipful Timothy Briden and Mr Aiden Hargreaves-Smith to speak to, their submissions. 5 Amending Canon come to the Synod for their Final Drafting and Final Approval Stages, since it will help the Synod at that point to be able to see the emerging shape of the whole package, even though one part of it will necessarily be only a draft: see paragraphs 427 to 432 below. To facilitate that process, the Committee considered the illustrative draft Code in the light of the changes it agreed to the draft Measure and draft Amending Canon. Its views on it are set out in Appendix 6. 8. The reports of Legislative Revision Committees do not generally make for light or easy reading. Their purpose is to set out, systematically and comprehensively, the consideration given by the Committee to submissions for amendment received from members of the Synod. That necessarily involves a good deal of dense and sometimes technical material. 9. Our report is no exception. Indeed, the large number and wide range of the submissions that we have had to work through mean that this document cannot be other than a long read. Given the huge importance of the issues at stake we have, however, thought hard about how best we might fashion a report which would best enable Synod members to follow the journey that we have been on together as a committee over the past year. We strongly urge Synod members to study this report carefully in preparation for the July debates. 10. We have adopted a four-part structure for this report: (a) In the first section, How the journey began, we provide some very brief historical background, a summary of what led up to the establishment of the Committee, a reminder of the nature of our task and an account of how we decided to set about out task. (b) Secondly, in How the journey unfolded, we have provided a chronological account of that part of the Committee‟s deliberations which involved grappling with the fundamental choices over the underlying philosophy of the legislation.