Chapter 3. Existing Environment, Anticipated Impacts, and Mitigation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2013 Legislative Report Template
2016 Report on the MnDOT Cost Participation Policy DRAFT – 12/11/15 1 Prepared by The Minnesota Department of Transportation 395 John Ireland Boulevard Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899 Phone: 651-296-3000 Toll-Free: 1-800-657-3774 TTY, Voice or ASCII: 1-800-627-3529 2 Contents Contents .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Legislative request .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Summary .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Interpretation ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 Interpreting the Law ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Policy Principles ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Consulting Representatives of Local Units of Government ....................................................................... 8 Policy Recommendations ................................................................................................................................. 9 Non-Policy -
TCEP I-10-County Line Interchange
CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SB 1 Program Application Transmittal Sheet Project Name: I-10/County Line Road Interchange Project Nominating Agency/Agencies: City of Calimesa and City of Yucaipa Implementing Agency/Agencies: City of Calimesa and City of Yucaipa Total Project Cost: $8,800,000 Requesting Cost: $6,160,000 Project Location: Interstate 10 and County Line Road City/Cities: City of Calimesa and City of Yucaipa County/Counties: County of Riverside and County of San Bernardino Post Miles: SBD R38.949 to RIV R0.239 Legislative Districts: Assembly Districts: 42nd District Senate Districts: 23rd District Program(s) Applying for: Local Partnership Program ([email protected]) Solutions to Congested Corridors Program ([email protected]) X Trade Corridor Enhancement Program ([email protected]) For Agencies with Multiple Project Submissions: Priority # 1 of 1 projects CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2018 TRADE CORRIDOR ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (TCEP) Interstate 10 and County Line Road Interchange I-10/County Line Road Interchange Project TCEP APPLICATION Section B. Government Code Section 14525.3 The Interstate 10 (I-10) and County Line Road Interchange Project is not a new bulk coal terminal project and will not be used to handle, store, or transport coal in bulk. As such, the Project will not have significant environmental impacts related to bulk coal handling. Section C. Street and Highway Code Section 100.15 The I-10/County Line Road Interchange Project is an interchange improvement project in the Cities of Calimesa and Yucaipa, and in the Counties of Riverside and San Bernardino, but reversible lanes are not a viable solution for this project. -
Outreach Summary P a G E | 1 August 2020 REFERENCE B
REFERENCE B Outreach #1 Summary Table of Contents Introduction..................................................................................................................................................1 Listening Sessions ........................................................................................................................................2 Online Survey................................................................................................................................................2 Key Findings..................................................................................................................................................3 Survey Questions and Summary ..................................................................................................................3 Demographics.............................................................................................................................................29 Appendix A..................................................................................................................................................39 Appendix B................................................................................................................................................136 Appendix C................................................................................................................................................139 Introduction The following report provides an overview of the results of the listening sessions and -
VP 13-07 View from NE 82Nd Avenue Near Portland International Airport Description of Resource Surroundings Vicinity
VP 13-07 View from NE 82nd Avenue near Portland International Airport Score: 53.98 Description of Resource The viewpoint is along NE 82nd Avenue slightly north of the Columbia Slough. There are no specific areas where vehicles can pull off the road at this location so the view is generally seen as one drives north or south along NE 82nd. The view is north to Mt. St. Helens and easterly to Mt. Hood over property that is currently undeveloped. There is also a partial view of Rocky Butte to the southeast. Surroundings Northeast 82nd Avenue serves as a major route to the City from the airport. The west side of the road is developed with commercial uses such as motels. The east side of the road is beginning to be developed with uses allowed under the current zoning. The Port of Portland received a conditional use approval in 1988 for a planned business park for approximately 460 acres ofland immediately east ofthis viewpoint. Six phases of development are planned to include office, hotel, restaurant, warehouse, distribution, research and development, light manufacturing and other similar uses. Open space areas will include the existing sloughs and nearby vegetation, landscape setbacks, a central water feature, a water retention area, runway clear zone, and a clear zone buffer area. A portion of the 40-Mile Loop Trail will be included in the busines park to the south of the viewpoint along the slough. Vicinity Map 74 ESEE ANALYSIS OF SCENIC RESOURCES 163357 VP 13-07 Existing Development Potential The current zoning of the entire business park is a mixture of general employment (GE-2LN) and general industrial (GI-2LN). -
Alameda County
County Summaries Alameda County Overview Located at the heart of the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area, Alameda County is the second-largest county in the Bay Area, with a population of over 1.66 million. The extensive transportation network of roads, rails, buses, trails and pathways carries roughly 1.2 million commute trips daily to, from, within and through the county, supporting economic growth in the Bay Area, California and the rest of the nation. The county’s transportation system is multimodal, with non-auto trips growing more quickly than auto trips: between 2010 and 2018, for every new solo driver, four people began using transit, walking, biking, or telecommuting. Roads and Highways Alameda County roadways move people and goods within the county and beyond and support multiple transportation modes. As regional economic and population growth increase demand for goods and services, a variety of modes, including cars, transit, bikes and trucks, are competing to access the same facilities. The majority of Alameda County’s 3,978 road miles are highways, arterials and major local roads that provide access to housing, jobs, education and transit. Forty percent of daily trips in Alameda County are carried on arterials and major roads. Currently, five of the Bay Area’s top 10 most-congested freeway segments are in Alameda County, and average freeway delays are growing. The congestion in Alameda County is compounded by the large amount of vehicle, rail and Travelers have made over 14.5 million trips on the I-580 freight travel through Alameda Express Lanes since opening in February 2016. -
TM 27 – NJ-29 Interchange Roundabout Evaluation Study
Prepared for: I-95/Scudder Falls Bridge Improvement Project TM 27 – NJ-29 Interchange Roundabout Evaluation Study Contract C-393A, Capital Project No. CP0301A, Account No. 7161-06-012 Prepared by: Philadelphia, PA In association with: Kittelson & Associates, Inc March 2006 TM 29 – NJ-29 Interchange Roundabout Evaluation Study Contract C-393A, Capital Project No. CP0301A, Account No. 7161-06-012 I-95/Scudder Falls Bridge Improvement Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ................................................................. i Introduction ........................................................................ 1 Project Background .............................................................. 1 The KAI Assessment Scope ................................................... 3 Development of Additional Alternative Interchange Options4 Option 1A Modified: DMJM Folded Diamond w/Roundabout ........ 4 Option 1C Modified: NJDOT Roundabout Modified ..................... 5 Operational Assessment...................................................... 6 Assessment Tool Selection .................................................... 6 Assessment Results.............................................................. 6 I-95 Northbound Ramps/NJ-29 (Southern Intersection)............. 7 Intersection Levels of Service (LOS) ......................................................................... 7 Volume to Capacity Ratio (V/C) ............................................................................... 9 Intersection Delay .............................................................................................. -
Potential Improvements Have Been Identified for Consideration with the Goals of Improving Corridor Mobility for All Modes of Transportation
Potential improvements have been identified for consideration with the goals of improving corridor mobility for all modes of transportation. Information from existing transportation conditions, environmental screening, public input, and stakeholder meetings was used to identify several potential improvements for consideration and evaluation. The recommended potential improvements are categorized as Highway Improvements; Interchanges and Auxiliary Lane Improvements; Local Street Improvements; and Noise Abatement Improvements to address the needs of the corridor. The categories of potential improvements to address these key operational issues are listed in Table 5. Within each category, the list of viable potential projects is listed in a table and shown on the corridor map. Exhibits illustrating the potential improvements are included in Attachment 1. Study Goals Need/Deficiency Potential Improvements Improve travel time reliability; Improve operations and reduce Highway Improvements Preserve and enhance the travel time delay along highway ▪ HOV Lanes environment corridor ▪ EL ▪ Mainline Metering (system interchanges) Improve mainline and Address highway bottlenecks and Interchanges Improvements interchange operations improve weaving conditions ▪ HOV/EL direct connectors ▪ HOV by-pass lanes on ramps ▪ Interchange reconfigurations Promote multiple modes of Promote and develop alternative Local Street Improvements travel; Promote transit modes of transportation ▪ Add Bicycle Lanes alternatives; Improve bicycle ▪ Add or improve sidewalks -
BARBUR PLACE 24 Units • Portland, Oregon OFFERING MEMORANDUM INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BARBUR PLACE 24 Units • Portland, Oregon OFFERING MEMORANDUM INVESTMENT SUMMARY Barbur Place is a 24-unit community in Southwest Portland that offers Barbur Place has been well cared for over the years. Dishwashers have an investor an exceptionally well maintained asset with the potential to been added to one-bedroom units on turnover (each two-bedroom increase rents. Completed in 1969, Barbur Place consists of two adjacent already included a dishwasher) and kitchens have recently been upgraded buildings offering nicely designed one- and two-bedroom units with with granite countertops. The owners have spent a significant amount of private decks or patios. time and money on capital improvements in the past year, including: Barbur Place’s rents currently average $1,000 per unit or $1.50 per square • New roof foot. Rents have grown significantly over the past several months—an average increase of $58 over 2017 year-end leases. Barbur Place’s nicely • New siding planned units—with updated finishes and amenities throughout—make • Parking lot re-striping this an attractive home for tenants. • New cabinets, appliances, carpets, and fixtures • Landscaping upgrades 2 HFO INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SUMMARY ASSET SUMMARY Property Barbur Place Location 8924 SW 30th Ave Portland, OR 97219 County Multnomah 66.67% 33.33% Total Units 24 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom Year Built 1969 Stories 3 stories Approx. NR Sq Ft 16,000 Average Sq Ft 667 Acreage 0.63 PRICING FOR MORE INFORMATION Price $3,725,000 Greg Frick • [email protected] Price Per Unit $155,208 HFO Investment Real Estate Per Square Foot $233 2424 SE 11th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97214 www.hfore.com • (503) 241.5541 • Fax: (503) 241.5548 Projected Cap Rate 5.20% Brokers licensed in Oregon and Washington. -
Draft Constrained Project List Projects Are Listed Alphabetically by County and Nominating Agency
2018 Regional Transportation Plan Constrained Project List - Public Review Draft Draft Constrained Project List Projects are listed alphabetically by County and nominating agency. Included in Financially Nominating 2018 RTP Estimated Cost Constrained RTP Investment County Agency Primary Facility Owner Time Period ID Project Name Start location End location Description (2016 dollars) project list Category Primary Purpose Clackamas County Clackamas County Clackamas County 2018-2027 11774 Johnson Creek Blvd and Bell Ave Johnson Creek NA Improve intersection of Johnson Creek Blvd and $ 1,500,000 Yes Active Reduce fatal and Intersection Safety Improvements Blvd/Bell Ave Bell Ave to improve intersection safety by Transportation severe injury crashes (TSAP) intersection implementing proven safety counter measures for bicyclist and pedestrians as identified in county Transportation Safety Action Plan and improve ADA accessibility. No change in intersection capacity. Clackamas County Clackamas County ODOT 2018-2027 10018 82nd Ave. Bike and Ped Safety Monterey Ave. Sunnybrook Blvd. Improve safety for bike and pedestrian system $ 1,745,000 Yes Active Reduce fatal and Improvements by completing gaps and implementing proven Transportation severe injury crashes safety counter measures at identified locations within the corridor. Improve ADA accessibility. Clackamas County Clackamas County ODOT 2018-2027 10024 McLoughlin Blvd. Improvement Milwaukie Gladstone Improve safety for bicyclist and pedestrians by $ 7,685,000 Yes Active Reduce fatal and adding bikeways, pedestrian facilities, fill Transportation severe injury crashes sidewalk gaps, add transit supportive elements, improve ADA accessibility, and implementing proven safety counter measures. Clackamas County Clackamas County NCPRD 2018-2027 10085 Lake Oswego Oak Grove Bike Ped Willamette Shoreline Trolley Trail Improve safety and mobility for bicyclists and $ 21,536,380 Yes Active Increase travel Bridge Over the Willamette River pedestrians by constructing a bike/pedestrian Transportation options/alt. -
Download PDF File Discussion Draft
Volume I: Policies, Objectives and Recommendations CHAPTER III. POLICIES, OBJECTIVES, AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. INTRODUCTION This chapter provides an overview of the River Plan / South Reach proposal by topic: o Watershed Health and Resilience. o Recreation. o Riverfront Communities. Each topical section includes the following: A brief introduction. Overview of the issues and opportunities. Comprehensive Plan policy guidance. Objectives to address the issues and opportunities consistent with the policy guidance. Proposed actions to implement the objectives. Actions may include proposed regulations, investments and/or programs that would be implemented by the City, other jurisdictions, the community, property owners or others. The full action plan can be found in Part 2 of this volume (see page 285 in Part 2). The issues and opportunities raised in the topic sections, Watershed Health and Resilience, Recreation and Riverfront Communities, are not mutually exclusive. Therefore, you may need to explore each section to understand the full range of recommendations related to a particular issue. River Plan / South Reach Discussion Draft 25 Volume I: Policies, Objectives and Recommendations B. WATERSHED HEALTH AND RESILIENCE 1. OVERVIEW The Lower Willamette River is a defining feature of the City of Portland. It travels through the heart of the city and is held as a symbol of the deep relationship between the people of Portland and their natural environment. The South Reach portion of the Lower Willamette River is truly unique within the city because of its natural beauty and expansive natural resources. A diverse mix of habitat types in the area support a variety of flora and fauna, including salmonid species listed under the federal ESA. -
Maintenance of Traffic for Innovative Geometric Design Work Zones
Maintenance of Traffic for Innovative Geometric Design Work Zones Final Report December 2015 Sponsored by Smart Work Zone Deployment Initiative Federal Highway Administration (TPF-5(081)) About SWZDI Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska created the Midwest States Smart Work Zone Deployment Initiative (SWZDI) in 1999 and Wisconsin joined in 2001. Through this pooled-fund study, researchers investigate better ways of controlling traffic through work zones. Their goal is to improve the safety and efficiency of traffic operations and highway work. ISU Non-Discrimination Statement Iowa State University does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, age, ethnicity, religion, national origin, pregnancy, sexual orientation, gender identity, genetic information, sex, marital status, disability, or status as a U.S. veteran. Inquiries regarding non-discrimination policies may be directed to Office of Equal Opportunity, Title IX/ADA Coordinator, and Affirmative Action Officer, 3350 Beardshear Hall, Ames, Iowa 50011, 515-294-7612, email [email protected]. Notice The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the sponsors. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. DOT in the interest of information exchange. The sponsors assume no liability for the contents or use of the information contained in this document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The sponsors do not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document. -
Critical Corridors and Subareas Page 79 PART 5: CRITICAL CORRIDORS and SUBAREAS
5 PREFACE page 1 PART 1: Community Profile page 11 PART 2: Comprehensive Plan Essence page 15 PART 3: Land Classification Plan page 27 PART 4: Transportation Plan page 47 PART 5: Critical Corridors and Subareas page 79 PART 5: CRITICAL CORRIDORS AND SUBAREAS CRITICAL CORRIDORS AND SUBAREAS Plan Map: Each critical corridor or subarea has a full-page illustration of the area within its boundaries. The map is INTRODUCTION included to support the “Strategy” and “Design Guidelines” sections and to illustrate additional information not included in the written text. In many of the maps, the Bicycle and Part 5: Critical Corridors and Subareas has been Pedestrian Plan Map information and Thoroughfare Plan established to provide a summary of several planning studies Map information is integrated. and small area plans. The following sections represent In some critical corridor and subarea sections, a “Detailed” the essence of those studies and plans, and add greater Plan Map is included. The inclusion of such a map is refinement to transportation and growth management goals indication that those critical corridors or subareas have had and objectives. more extensive study and planning. The purpose of this Part is to emphasize that there are certain areas and corridors in the City that require a greater degree of planning. They also require a greater level of review when development proposals are being considered. The following critical corridors and subareas are included in this Part: 1. Keystone Parkway Corridor ............................. pg 82 2. U.S. 31 Corridor ............................................... pg 84 3. 96th Street Corridor ......................................... pg 86 4. City Center/Old Town Subarea .......................