BUSINESS MASTER PLAN for Development and Construction of a Ski Center in the Galičica National Park

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BUSINESS MASTER PLAN for Development and Construction of a Ski Center in the Galičica National Park BUSINESS MASTER PLAN FOR Development and Construction of a Ski Center in the Galičica National Park. AD MEPSO d.d. Orce Nikolov b.b. 1000 SKOPJE MASTER PLAN SKI CENTER GALIČICA INTRODUCTION DISCLAIMER Our study and report are based on assumptions and estimates that are subject to uncertainty and variation. In addition, we have made assumptions as to the future behaviour of consumers and the general economy, which are uncertain. This Report is for your internal purposes and for submission to strategic partners and potential creditors of the project. Any use of the Report must include the entire content of such report in the form delivered to you. No portion or excerpts thereof may be otherwise quoted or referred to in any offering statement, prospectus, loan agreement, or other document unless expressly approved in writing by Horwath HTL. Reproducing or copying of this Report may not be done without our prior consent. MASTER PLAN SKI CENTER GALIČICA © COPYRIGHT 2014 by HORWATH HTL All rights reserved; no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without either the prior written permission of Horwath HTL or a license permitting restricted copying. This publication may not be lent, resold, hired out or otherwise disposed of by way of trade in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published, without prior consent of Horwath HTL. MASTER PLAN SKI CENTER GALIČICA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ASSIGNMENT AND PROCEDURES ____________________________________ 10 1.1 Assignment ________________________________________________________________ 10 1.2 Procedures ________________________________________________________________ 10 2 SITUATION ANALYSES ______________________________________________ 13 2.1 MACEDONIA _______________________________________________________________ 13 2.1.1 General facts, geography _____________________________________________ 13 2.1.2 Traffic access ________________________________________________________ 22 2.1.3 Economic environment _______________________________________________ 26 2.2 GALIČICA AREA ____________________________________________________________ 36 2.2.1 Ohrid municipality - general facts _____________________________________ 36 2.2.2 Ohrid History and culture _____________________________________________ 37 2.2.3 Economy _____________________________________________________________ 42 2.2.4 Resen municipalities - general facts ___________________________________ 43 2.2.5 History and culture ___________________________________________________ 44 2.2.6 Economy _____________________________________________________________ 44 2.2.7 Regions Infrastructure and current planning framework ________________ 45 2.3 CONSLUSIONS OF THE SITUATION ANALYSIS _________________________________ 46 3 MARKET ANALYSES ________________________________________________ 49 3.1 MACEDONIA TOURISM AND HOTEL MARKET _________________________________ 49 3.1.1 Accommodation supply _______________________________________________ 49 3.1.2 Key attractions and destinations ______________________________________ 54 3.1.3 Demand _____________________________________________________________ 56 3.1.4 Macedonia mountain centres __________________________________________ 66 3.1.5 Performance _________________________________________________________ 67 3.2 OHRID AND RESEN MARKET _________________________________________________ 68 3.2.1 Accommodation supply _______________________________________________ 68 3.2.2 Demand _____________________________________________________________ 71 3.2.3 Performance _________________________________________________________ 74 3.3 COMPETITION ANALYSIS ____________________________________________________ 74 Page 4 of 161 © 2013 Horwath HTL MASTER PLAN SKI CENTER GALIČICA 3.3.1 Regional competition overview ________________________________________ 74 3.3.2 Brief assessment of regional markets __________________________________ 84 3.4 CONCLUSIONS OF MARKET ANALYSIS________________________________________ 85 3.5 MARKET POTENTIAL ESTIMATION ___________________________________________ 86 3.5.1 Assumptions _________________________________________________________ 86 3.5.2 Market potential 2013 ________________________________________________ 87 3.5.3 Market potential 2023 ________________________________________________ 89 3.6 KEY CONSLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ________________________________ 89 4 MARKETING STRATEGY ____________________________________________ 93 4.1 STRATEGIC STRONGHOLDS _________________________________________________ 93 4.1.1. Introduction__________________________________________________________ 93 4.1.2. Strategic strongholds _________________________________________________ 93 4.2. MARKETING STRATEGY _____________________________________________________ 96 4.2.1. Market and competitive positioning ___________________________________ 96 4.2.2. System of experiences ________________________________________________ 97 4.2.3. Elements of differentiation ____________________________________________ 99 4.2.4. Unique selling proposition (USP)______________________________________ 100 4.3. PRODUCTS AND MARKETS _________________________________________________ 101 4.3.1. Tourism products and product features ______________________________ 101 4.3.2. Target markets ______________________________________________________ 105 5 CONCEPT AND BUSINESS MODEL ___________________________________ 109 5.1 GALIČICA MOUNTAIN RESORT CONCEPT ____________________________________ 109 5.2 CONCEPT AND SPACE ALLOCATION FOR THE FIRST DEVELOPMENT PHASE ____ 112 5.2.1. Gradište location ____________________________________________________ 112 5.2.2. Upper Peštani location _______________________________________________ 116 5.2.3. Other concept considerations – Oteševo connection and development__ 117 5.3 business and management model __________________________________________ 118 5.3.1. Introduction ________________________________________________________ 118 5.3.2. Project development – foundation of development company __________ 118 5.3.3. Managing resort operations _________________________________________ 122 6 FINANCIAL EVALUATION __________________________________________ 125 6.1 INVESTMENT VOLUME AND TIME SCHEDULE ________________________________ 125 6.1.1 Scenario 1 - Investments ____________________________________________ 125 6.1.2 Scenario 2 - Investments ____________________________________________ 128 6.2 FINANCING MODEL ________________________________________________________ 129 Page 5 of 161 © 2013 Horwath HTL MASTER PLAN SKI CENTER GALIČICA 6.2.1 Scenario 1 – Financing model ________________________________________ 130 6.2.2 Scenario 2 – Financing model ________________________________________ 131 6.3 OPERATING PROJECTIONS __________________________________________________ 133 6.3.1 Methodology ________________________________________________________ 133 6.3.2 Operational Assumptions and Projections _____________________________ 134 6.3.2.1 Scenario 1 – Operations and projections _______________________________ 134 6.3.2.2 Scenario 2 – Operations and projections _______________________________ 146 6.4 FINANCIAL EVALUATION ___________________________________________________ 152 6.4.1 Scenario 1 - Financial evaluation _____________________________________ 152 6.4.2 Scenario 2 - Financial evaluation _____________________________________ 153 6.4.3 Scenario 3 – As in Scenario 1 with only phase 1 development - Financial evaluation __________________________________________________________ 155 6.4.4 Scenario 4 – As in Scenario 2 with only phase 1 development - Financial evaluation __________________________________________________________ 156 6.4.5 Scenario 5 – As in Scenario 1 with hotel management companies - Financial evaluation __________________________________________________________ 156 6.4.6 Scenario 6 – As in Scenario 1 with extension of the development to Prespansko area - Financial evaluation _______________________________ 157 6.5 ECONOMY EFFECTS ________________________________________________________ 158 7 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ____________________________ 160 Page 6 of 161 © 2013 Horwath HTL MASTER PLAN SKI CENTER GALIČICA LIST OF ABREVIATIONS, GLOSSARY average achieved rate per room: rack rate ADR Average Daily Rate after deduction of VAT, discounts, etc. av. average DOF Double Occupancy Factor average number of guests per room occupied e.g. for example (exempli gratia) Earnings before Interest, operational result after deduction of EBITDA Income Tax, Depreciation and management fees and fixed charges Amortization etc. et cetera Frequent Independent F.I.T. Traveller F&B Food & Beverage movable furniture, fixtures or other Furniture, Fixtures & FF&E equipment which have no permanent Equipment connection to the structure of the building GDA Gross Developed Area GDP Gross Domestic Product operational result before management fees GOP Gross Operating Profit and fixed charges Gross Operating Profit per GOPPAR Available Room KPIs Key Performance Indicators Meetings, Incentives, overall term to describe the meetings & MICE Congresses, Events congress market NDA Net Developed Area percentage of rooms occupied in relation to Occ. Occupancy Rate number of operating days (or 365 days) p.a. Per Annum per year Rev. Revenues total room revenues divided by number of RevPAR Revenue per Available Room total available room nights SOP Standard Operating
Recommended publications
  • Ohrid the City Where the Cultural Embraces the Natural Heritage
    OHRID THE CITY WHERE THE CULTURAL EMBRACES THE NATURAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF OHRID FOR WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTY: NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE OHRID REGION (within the territory of the Municipality of Ohrid) 2014-2020 1 2 MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF OHRID FOR WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTY: NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE OHRID REGION (within the territory of the Municipality of Ohrid) 2014-2020 3 4 MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF OHRID FOR WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTY: NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE OHRID REGION (within the territory of the Municipality of Ohrid) 2014-2020 5 6 The Management Plan 2014-2020 has been funded by EU funds of the Project SUSTCULT: “Achieving SUSTainability through an integrated approach to the management of CULTural heritage” – South-East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme. 7 8 Contents 1 Introduction 11 2 Planning Methodology 15 3 The World Heritage property: Natural and cultural heritage of the Ohrid region 19 3.1 Basic Data 20 3.2 Criteria for inscription on the world heritage list 20 3.3 The territory of the Municipality of Ohrid within the boundaries of the WHP Ohrid region 22 3.3.1 Buffer zone 23 3.4 Outstanding Universal Value 23 3.4.1 Statement of Significance 23 4 Management Plan of the Municipality of Ohrid for WHP: Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Ohrid region (within the territory of the Municipality of Ohrid) 27 4.1 The Management plan for the World Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Ohrid region 28 4.2 The Main Aim and Need for Management
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Methodology and Protocols for 20 Habitats, 20 Species and 20 Birds
    1 Finnish Environment Institute SYKE, Finland Monitoring methodology and protocols for 20 habitats, 20 species and 20 birds Twinning Project MK 13 IPA EN 02 17 Strengthening the capacities for effective implementation of the acquis in the field of nature protection Report D 3.1. - 1. 7.11.2019 Funded by the European Union The Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning, Department of Nature, Republic of North Macedonia Metsähallitus (Parks and Wildlife Finland), Finland The State Service for Protected Areas (SSPA), Lithuania 2 This project is funded by the European Union This document has been produced with the financial support of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the Twinning Project MK 13 IPA EN 02 17 and and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union 3 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Summary 6 Overview 8 Establishment of Natura 2000 network and the process of site selection .............................................................. 9 Preparation of reference lists for the species and habitats ..................................................................................... 9 Needs for data .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Protocols for the monitoring of birds ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Aromanians in Macedonia
    Macedonian Historical Review 3 (2012) Македонска историска ревија 3 (2012) EDITORIAL BOARD: Boban PETROVSKI, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia (editor-in-chief) Nikola ŽEŽOV, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia Dalibor JOVANOVSKI, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia Toni FILIPOSKI, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia Charles INGRAO, Purdue University, USA Bojan BALKOVEC, University of Ljubljana,Slovenia Aleksander NIKOLOV, University of Sofia, Bulgaria Đorđe BUBALO, University of Belgrade, Serbia Ivan BALTA, University of Osijek, Croatia Adrian PAPAIANI, University of Elbasan, Albania Oliver SCHMITT, University of Vienna, Austria Nikola MINOV, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia (editorial board secretary) ISSN: 1857-7032 © 2012 Faculty of Philosophy, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, Macedonia University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius - Skopje Faculty of Philosophy Macedonian Historical Review vol. 3 2012 Please send all articles, notes, documents and enquiries to: Macedonian Historical Review Department of History Faculty of Philosophy Bul. Krste Misirkov bb 1000 Skopje Republic of Macedonia http://mhr.fzf.ukim.edu.mk/ [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 Nathalie DEL SOCORRO Archaic Funerary Rites in Ancient Macedonia: contribution of old excavations to present-day researches 15 Wouter VANACKER Indigenous Insurgence in the Central Balkan during the Principate 41 Valerie C. COOPER Archeological Evidence of Religious Syncretism in Thasos, Greece during the Early Christian Period 65 Diego PEIRANO Some Observations about the Form and Settings of the Basilica of Bargala 85 Denitsa PETROVA La conquête ottomane dans les Balkans, reflétée dans quelques chroniques courtes 95 Elica MANEVA Archaeology, Ethnology, or History? Vodoča Necropolis, Graves 427a and 427, the First Half of the 19th c.
    [Show full text]
  • BUSINESS MASTER PLAN for Development and Construction of a Ski Cente R in the Galičica National Park
    BUSINESS MASTER PLAN FOR Development and Construction of a Ski Cente r in the Galičica National Park AD MEPSO d.d. Orce Nikolov b.b. 1000 SKOPJE MASTER PLAN SKI CENTER GALIČICA INTRODUCTION DISCLAIMER Our study and report are based on assumptions and estimates that are subject to uncertainty and variation. In addition, we have made assumptions as to the future behaviour of consumers and the general economy, which are uncertain. This Report is for your internal purposes and for submission to strategic partners and potential creditors of the project. Any use of the Report must include the entire content of such report in the form delivered to you. No portion or excerpts thereof may be otherwise quoted or referred to in any offering statement, prospectus, loan agreement, or other document unless expressly approved in writing by Horwath HTL. Reproducing or copying of this Report may not be done without our prior consent. MASTER PLAN SKI CENTER GALIČICA © COPYRIGHT 2014 by HORWATH HTL All rights reserved; no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without either the prior written permission of Horwath HTL or a license permitting restricted copying. This publication may not be lent, resold, hired out or otherwise disposed of by way of trade in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published, without prior consent of Horwath HTL. MASTER PLAN SKI CENTER GALIČICA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ASSIGNMENT
    [Show full text]
  • National Operational Broadband Plan
    NATIONAL OPERATIONAL BROADBAND PLAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION SOCIETY AND ADMINISTRATION April 2019 1 DOCUMENT OBJECTIVE Republic of North Macedonia, being a candidate country for EU membership, is obliged to harmonise its national policies on electronic communications development with EU policies, in line with which an obligation was imposed to adopt a National Operational Broadband Plan (NOBP), which will be harmonised with the strategic objectives of the EU 2010 initiative on Digital Agenda for Europe1, as an umbrella strategy for information society development, and the EU 2016 strategy Towards a European Gigabit Society2 for 2025. Also, the development of the National Operational Broadband Plan took into consideration the EU recommendations and regulations on the development of the next generations of broadband networks, recommendations for using state aid in broadband development, EU 2018 strategy for enlargement with Western Balkan countries3, EU reports on the broadband market development, reports from international institutions on the electronic communications development in the region (World Bank etc.), reports and experiences of EU member states in using state aid for broadband development, etc. The National Operational Broadband Plan, succeeding the National Strategy for Development of the Next Generation of Broadband Internet, sets the national broadband4 targets that are to be achieved over the next period of time, and defines the measures and activities required for achieving those targets. DEVELOPMENT, REVISION OF THE NATIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • DCFF Saturday Party Playlist
    Door County Folk Festival Global Dance After-Party #2 Sat/Sun - 10/11 July 2021 - 7:00pm-6:20am CST Schedule Subject to Change (Times are approximate) Playlist Begins on Next Page - Scroll Down Click for Door County Folk Festival Announcement Guest Hosts From Guest Hosts From Filip Arilon Veles - North Macedonia Barbara Merson Portland - ME USA Diane Baker Corona del Mar - CA USA Melissa Miller (Live Music-Sviraci) Santa Clara - CA USA Fred Bear (Last Dance) Chicago Area - IL USA Stewart-Tengco Mirinisa (Live Music) Albuquerque - NM USA Melissa Boutell Hudsonville - MI USA Asako Oshiro Santa Monica - CA USA Tom Bozigian La Mirada - CA USA John Parrish (Live Music) Oak Park - MI USA Clara Byom (Live Music) Albuquerque - NM USA Mariana Paunova sao paulo - Brazil Evan Chu Newark - CA USA Steve Petrovich (Live Music) Greenfield - WI USA Sherry Cochran Los Angeles - CA USA Tom Pixton (Live Music) Arlington - MA USA Paul Collins Chicago Area - IL USA Holly Plotner Austin - TX USA Bill Cope (Live Music-Cope-a-Cabana) San Jose - CA USA Dean Ranger San Diego - CA USA Dimitris Delis Athens - Greece Patti Ranger San Diego - CA USA Sharon Flory New York - NY USA Leslie Scott Columbus - OH USA Joan Hantman Los Angeles - CA USA Judy Silver Toronto - ON Canada Leigh Holden Denver Area - CO USA Parsons Sisters (Live Music) Albuquerque - NM USA Peter Holmes Piedmont - CA USA Lew Smith (Live Music-Sviraci) Santa Clara - CA USA Vincent Hsu Taipei - Taiwan Happy Dancers of Taiwan Taushung - Taiwan Shirley Johnson (Live Music) Austin - TX USA Rebecca Tsai
    [Show full text]
  • Ohrid Municipality I
    PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT Rehabilitation of various streets and two local roads and procurement of special vehicles for communal enterprise August 2014 OHRID MUNICIPALITY I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE MUNICIPALITY Ohrid municipality is one of 80 municipalities in the Republic of Macedonia and belongs to the South West planning region occupying part of Ohrid-Struga valley, Lake Ohrid and part of Galicica National Park. It borders Debarca municipality to the north, Resen municipality to the east, Struga municipality to the west and Albania to the south. Total area of 383.93km 2 comprises 204km 2 land and 179.93km 2 water. Total population is 55,749 inhabitants. The climate is continental with some Mediterranean influence coming through the mountain of Galicica. There are 18 urban communities and 26 rural communities in the city. Ohrid city and the Ohrid Lake became a world cultural and natural heritage under the protection of UNESCO since 1979. Figure 1: Republic of Macedonia *note: the municipal territory is marked in green 2 Figure 2: Municipalities of the South West region *The South-west planning region is one of eight statistical regions within the Republic of Macedonia. It comprises 9 municipalities: Vevcani, Debar, Debrca, Ohrid, Kicevo, Makedonski Brod, Plasnica, Struga and Centar Zupa. B. DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC PROFILE According to the last 2002 Census the total number of inhabitants in the municipality is 55,749 from which male are 27,598 and female 28,151 with natural increase of 0.4%. In relation to the ethnic affiliation of the citizens, the prevailing population are Macedonians, representing 85% of the total population (see table 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Zerohack Zer0pwn Youranonnews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men
    Zerohack Zer0Pwn YourAnonNews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men YamaTough Xtreme x-Leader xenu xen0nymous www.oem.com.mx www.nytimes.com/pages/world/asia/index.html www.informador.com.mx www.futuregov.asia www.cronica.com.mx www.asiapacificsecuritymagazine.com Worm Wolfy Withdrawal* WillyFoReal Wikileaks IRC 88.80.16.13/9999 IRC Channel WikiLeaks WiiSpellWhy whitekidney Wells Fargo weed WallRoad w0rmware Vulnerability Vladislav Khorokhorin Visa Inc. Virus Virgin Islands "Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC" Versability Verizon Venezuela Vegas Vatican City USB US Trust US Bankcorp Uruguay Uran0n unusedcrayon United Kingdom UnicormCr3w unfittoprint unelected.org UndisclosedAnon Ukraine UGNazi ua_musti_1905 U.S. Bankcorp TYLER Turkey trosec113 Trojan Horse Trojan Trivette TriCk Tribalzer0 Transnistria transaction Traitor traffic court Tradecraft Trade Secrets "Total System Services, Inc." Topiary Top Secret Tom Stracener TibitXimer Thumb Drive Thomson Reuters TheWikiBoat thepeoplescause the_infecti0n The Unknowns The UnderTaker The Syrian electronic army The Jokerhack Thailand ThaCosmo th3j35t3r testeux1 TEST Telecomix TehWongZ Teddy Bigglesworth TeaMp0isoN TeamHav0k Team Ghost Shell Team Digi7al tdl4 taxes TARP tango down Tampa Tammy Shapiro Taiwan Tabu T0x1c t0wN T.A.R.P. Syrian Electronic Army syndiv Symantec Corporation Switzerland Swingers Club SWIFT Sweden Swan SwaggSec Swagg Security "SunGard Data Systems, Inc." Stuxnet Stringer Streamroller Stole* Sterlok SteelAnne st0rm SQLi Spyware Spying Spydevilz Spy Camera Sposed Spook Spoofing Splendide
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on Implementation of the Plan of Activities for Visibility and Comunicaton of IPARD 2014- 2020
    Organization of the IPARD Monitoring Committee REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE FORESTRY AND WATER ECONOMY Managing Authority REPORT on implementation of the Plan of activities for visibility and comunicaton of IPARD 2014- 2020 (According to Article 30, paragraph 3 of the Sectoral Agreement) (March 2016 – December 2017) December 2017 Project implemented by: IPARD Managing Authority, Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry and Water Economy Str. Aminta Treti 2, Skopje; Tel: +389 2 313 44 77 Financed: Measure Technical Assistance under IPARD Programme 2014-2020 1 Organization of the IPARD Monitoring Committee I. INTRODUCTION In the period 2016-2017 , the following activities from the Plan of activities for visibility and comunicaton of IPARD 2014-2020 were realized: 1. Update of website www.ipard.gov.mk ; 2. IPARD info events; 3. Trainings, workshops and seminars 4. Appearances on national and local radio and television stations as newspapers and Internet portals; 5. Publications of leaflets, brochure, supplements; The institutions responsible for the implementation of the abovementioned activities, respectively to their powers and the functions they perform, were the following: the Managin Authority (MA) within Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Economy and the Agency for Financial Support of Agriculture and Rural Development (AFSARD). II. IMPLEMENTED ACTIVITIES 5TU U5T 1. Updating the website www.ipard.gov.mk The new MA website www.ipard.gov.mk5TU U5T that was launched in July 2016 is registering great increase of visits and if in the first months the average number of visits was up to 2000, in January 2017, more than 9000 visits have been registered. In the period July 2016 –December 2017 in total 519.455 visitors on the website have been registerd.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonian Production & Location Guide
    MACEDONIAN PRODUCTION & LOCATION GUIDE MACEDONIAN FILM AGENCY 8 Mart No.4 1000 Skopje, Macedonia MACEDONIAN PRODUCTION & LOCATION GUIDE Let Macedonia be on your filmmaking map as a beautiful country with breathtaking landscapes, exceptional and skilled local talents and professionals, production companies that have an impressive record in domestic and international production, lowest taxes in the region and Europe and 20% production incentive. …The magic of the Republic of Macedonia is awaiting for you … Explore its beauty. CONTENT 05 INTRODUCTION 05 Macedonian Film Agency 06 Co-production Funding 08 Production incentive 09 Criteria for funding 10 WHY MACEDONIA? 12 MACEDONIA GENERAL OVERVIEW 12 Facts for Macedonia 14 Transport infrastructure 18 Accommodation 18 Communication 18 Climate 23 USEFUL INFO 23 Filming & Location Permits 23 Visas 23 Working Permits 24 Customs Regulations 24 Temporary Import of Professional Equipment 26 BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE MACEDONIAN FILM INDUSTRY 30 LOCATION GUIDE 30 Regions 38 Urban Areas 38 Rural Areas 40 Lakes 42 Rivers 42 Waterfalls 43 Mountains & National Parks 43 Spa Resorts 45 Caves 46 Big City Island 46 Archeological Sites 47 Churches & Monasteries 4 MACEDONIAN FILM AGENCY Macedonian Film Agency is the newly founded governing film body, erators, internet providers, cinema exhibitors, distributors, entertain- legal successor of the Macedonian Film Fund which started to work in ment games and games of chance. 2014 under the new Film Industry Law. The new Agency will continue Under the new Film Industry Law, The Macedonian Film Agency will to giving its full support to development of the film industry, film tra- be the first stop for foreign companies and individuals who are pre- dition and film culture in Macedonia.
    [Show full text]
  • Heraclea, Pelagonia and Medieval Bitola: an Outline of the Ecclesiastical History (6Th-12Th Century)
    Robert MIHAJLOVSKI Heraclea, Pelagonia and Medieval Bitola: An outline of the ecclesiastical history (6th-12th century) uDK 94:27(497.774)”5/l 1” La Trobe university, Melbourne [email protected] Abstract: Thisstudy presents my long-term field researCh on the Early Christian episCopal seat o f HeraClea LynCestis that was loCated along the anCient Roman Via Egnatia and in the valley o f Pelagonia. 1 disCuss various historiCal sourCes and topography of the region of medieval bishopric o f Pelagonia and Bitola. In addition, I also deal with the Christian Cultural heritage in the region. In this work these approaChes are within the Context o f archaeologiCal, historiCal and eCClesiastiCal investigation in the sites o f anCient HeaClea and modern Bitola. Key words: Heraclea Lyncestis, Pelagonia, Bitola, Prilep, Via Egnatia The Early Christian world on the Balkan Peninsula began to crumble already in the fourth century, with the invasions and migrations of the peoples and tribes. Vizigoths disrupted Balkan urban conditions in 378, the Huns of Atilla ravaged in 447 and Ostrogoths in 479. After the year 500 the disturbing catastrophes included an earthquake in 518, which seriously damaged the urban centers. Then came the Bubonic plague of 541-2, which was a terrible disaster of unprecedented magnitude, and other epidemics and catastrophes, which were recorded in 555, 558, 561, 573, 591 and 599.1 The invasions, epidemics and economic recession badly affected the population and society of the Eastern Roman Empire. Life in Herclea Lynkestis slowly declined. The Episcopal church was rebuilt in the early sixth century when the latest published coins of Justin II are found.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Macedonia
    © Research Project ”New and Ambiguous Nation-building Processes in Southeastern Europe” (Berlin/Graz 2007) Institutional Chronology of Nation Building REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA The Republic of Macedonia declared its independence from Yugoslavia on 19 November 1991. In 1944, the People’s Republic of Macedonia (NRM) had been established as one of the six constituent republics of the Federal People’s Republic of Yugoslavia. In 1963, the re- public’s name was changed into Socialist Republic of Macedonia (SRM). 1. Census-related Issues (after 1945) 1.1 Institution in Charge for Statistical Data and Censuses: By the decision of the Government of the PR of Macedonia on June 1, 1945, the Macedonian Federal Statistical Bureau was formed. Concomitant to the establishment of the national Sta- tistical Bureau, local statistical bureaus were created as well with the task to participate in collecting basic statistical data and carry out statistical research for the needs of the state. 1.2 Years of Census Since the end of the Second world War, 8 population censuses were conducted in the Re- public of Macedonia: 1948, 1953, 1961, 1971, 1981, 1991, 1994, 2002. Since the first post-war census, the ethnonym “Macedonians” was used for the majority pop- ulation of Macedonia, in contrast to the decades before, when they were counted as “Serbs” in the censuses of inter-war Yugoslavia. The largest minority are the Albanians, today com- prising about 25 percent of the total population. 1.3 Share of Macedonians and Albanians of the Total Population Year Total population Macedonians Albanians in 1,000 in % of the total population 1948 1,115 68.5 17.1 1953 1,305 66.0 12.4* 1961 1,406 71.2 13.0 1971 1,647 69.3 17.0 1981 1,909 67.0 19.8 1991 2,034 65.3 21.7 1994 1,946 66.6 22.7 2002 2,041 64.2 25.2 The numbers for other minorities in 2002 were: Turks 77,959 (3.85 %), Roma 53,879 (2.66 %), Serbs 35,939 (1.78 %), Bosniaks 17,018 (0.84%) and Vlachs 9.596 (0.48 %).
    [Show full text]