DOCSLIB.ORG

Unmanned Ground Systems Roadmap Robotic Systems Joint Project Office

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unmanned Ground Systems Roadmap Robotic Systems Joint Project Office UNCLASSIFIED Unmanned Ground Systems Roadmap Robotic Systems Joint Project Office Robotic Systems Joint Project Office Unmanned Ground Systems Roadmap July 2011 Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited Disclaimer: Reference herein to any specific commercial company, product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or the Department of the Army (DoA). The opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or the DoA, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. Unmanned Ground Systems Roadmap UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 1: RS JPO Goals and Vision; 2011 – 2020 .................................................................... 5 1.0 Roadmap Background .......................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Major Events since Release of the 2009 UGS Roadmap ..................................................... 5 1.2 RS JPO Mission .................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 RS JPO Partnerships ............................................................................................................. 6 1.3.1 RDECOM, Academia, Industry ..................................................................................... 6 1.3.2 Rapid Equipping Force (REF) & Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization (JIEDDO) ........................................................................................................... 7 1.3.3 RS JPO/Army Capabilities Integration Center (ARCIC) Partnership ........................... 7 1.3.4 The Joint Ground Robotics Integration Team (JGRIT) ................................................. 7 1.4 RS JPO Organizational Structure ......................................................................................... 8 1.4.1 APM & PI Roles and Responsibilities........................................................................... 8 1.4.1.1 APM – M160 APMCS ............................................................................................ 9 1.4.1.2 APM – PackBot Family of Systems ....................................................................... 9 1.4.1.3 APM – TALON Family .......................................................................................... 9 1.4.1.4 APM – Route Reconnaissance and Clearance (R2C) Robot Program.................... 9 1.4.1.5 APM – MARCbot ................................................................................................... 9 1.4.1.6 APM – Appliqué Kits ............................................................................................. 9 1.4.1.7 APM – Common Mobility Platform (CMP) ........................................................... 9 1.4.1.8 APM – Small Unmanned Ground Vehicle (SUGV) – XM1216 .......................... 10 1.4.1.9 APM – Autonomous Navigation System (ANS) – XM155 .................................. 10 1.4.2 RS JPO Liaison Officers .............................................................................................. 10 1.4.3 RS JPO Divisions ........................................................................................................ 11 1.4.3.1 Business Management Division............................................................................ 11 1.4.3.2 Logistics Division ................................................................................................. 13 1.4.3.3 Product Assurance, Test and Configuration Management (PATCM) Division ... 14 1.4.3.4 Technical Management Division .......................................................................... 16 Chapter 2: Technology Enablers/Road Ahead ......................................................................... 20 2.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 20 2.1 Autonomous Navigation ..................................................................................................... 21 2.2 Communications ................................................................................................................. 23 2.3 Power .................................................................................................................................. 26 2.4 Vision ................................................................................................................................. 28 2.5 Architecture ........................................................................................................................ 30 2.6 Soldier-Machine Interface (SMI) ....................................................................................... 33 2.7 Manipulation ....................................................................................................................... 34 2.8 Terrain Mobility ................................................................................................................. 36 2.9 Payloads .............................................................................................................................. 38 Chapter 3: UGV Modernization Strategy ................................................................................. 41 3.1 Army UGV Campaign Plan ................................................................................................ 41 3.2 RS JPO Needs Analysis ...................................................................................................... 43 3.3 RS JPO Priorities ................................................................................................................ 45 3.3.1 Modernization ............................................................................................................... 46 3.3.2 Emerging Requirements and Risk Reduction Efforts .................................................. 50 3.3.3 Interoperability ............................................................................................................ 52 3.4 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 55 2 UNCLASSIFIED July 2011 Unmanned Ground Systems Roadmap UNCLASSIFIED Appendix A: RS JPO Systems/Programs Portfolio .................................................................. 56 A1 Anti-Personnel Mine Clearing System, Remote Control (M160) ...................................... 56 A2 PackBot Family of Systems ................................................................................................ 58 A3 Mini-EOD ........................................................................................................................... 60 A4 TALON Family of Systems ................................................................................................ 62 A5 MARCbot ........................................................................................................................... 64 A6 Common Mobility Platform (CMP) ................................................................................... 66 A7 XM1216 Small Unmanned Ground Vehicle (SUGV) ........................................................ 68 A8 XM155 Autonomous Navigation System (ANS) ............................................................... 70 Appendix B: Acronym List ......................................................................................................... 72 List of Tables & Figures Figure 1. RS JPO Structure ............................................................................................................ 8 Figure 2. LNO Activities .............................................................................................................. 11 Figure 3. Technical Management Responsibilities....................................................................... 17 Figure 4. UGV Technology Enablers ........................................................................................... 20 Figure 5. Autonomous Navigation Enablers ................................................................................ 21 Table 1. Autonomous Navigation Capability Needs .................................................................... 21 Table 2. Autonomous Navigation Advancements ........................................................................ 22 Figure 6. Communications Enablers ............................................................................................ 23 Table 3. Communications Capability Needs ................................................................................ 24 Table 4. Communications Advancements .................................................................................... 24 Figure 7. Power Enablers ............................................................................................................. 26 Table 5. Power Use Profiles ......................................................................................................... 26 Table 6. Power Advancements ....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Irobot Corporation Irobot Designs, Develops and Sells Robots That Make a Difference
    iRobot Corporation iRobot designs, develops and sells robots that make a difference. iRobot invests significant resources to manufacture, promote and protect its products and related intellectual property. iRobot registered trademarks are protected under U.S. and international law; iRobot reserves the right to bring action against the infringement of legally protected trademarks and products. iRobot regularly monitors the Internet, including auction sites, in order to protect its intellectual property rights. Unauthorized reselling, marketing or auctioning using iRobot copyrighted items is illegal and can result in liability for damages, criminal penalties and termination of eBay selling privileges. iRobot notifies eBay of auction listings containing unauthorized uses of iRobot copyrights and trademarks. eBay complies with iRobot's request by taking appropriate action in accordance to its user policies. This includes the removal of auctions from the eBay website that illegally offer copyrighted terms and products. Only iRobot brand products, as supplied and distributed by iRobot Corporation, and delivered as manufactured, in the carton to the original customer purchaser, is warranted by iRobot Corporation against manufacturing defects in materials and workmanship for the qualifyinglimited warranty period. iRobot Affiliate Program If you are an online retailer and want to earn commission by selling iRobot products on your website, you may opt to participate in the iRobot Affiliate Program. iRobot selects partners based on corporate guidelines and federal law. Through the iRobot Affiliate Program, Approved Affiliates may earn cash by promoting iRobot products on their website by directing consumers from your site to the iRobot Online Store. The program is free to join and easy to use.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Inventory of AUV and Glider Technology Available for Routine Marine Surveying
    Appendix 1. Global Inventory of AUVs and Gliders Global Inventory of AUV and Glider Technology available for Routine Marine Surveying Project Leaders: Dr Russell Wynn (NOC) and Dr Elizabeth Linley (NERC) Report Prepared by: Dr James Hunt (NOC) Inventory correct as of September 2013 1 Return to Contents Appendix 1. Global Inventory of AUVs and Gliders Contents United Kingdom Institutes ................................................................. 16 Marine Autonomous and Robotic Systems (MARS) at National Oceanography Centre (NOC), Southampton ................................. 17 Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) at MARS ................................... 18 Autosub3 ...................................................................................................... 18 Technical Specification for Autosub3 ......................................................... 18 Autosub6000 ................................................................................................ 19 Technical Specification .............................................................................. 19 Autosub LR ...................................................................................................... 20 Technical Specification .............................................................................. 20 Air-Launched AUVs ........................................................................................ 21 Gliders at MARS .............................................................................................. 22 Teledyne
    [Show full text]
  • Kinematic Modeling of a Rhex-Type Robot Using a Neural Network
    Kinematic Modeling of a RHex-type Robot Using a Neural Network Mario Harpera, James Paceb, Nikhil Guptab, Camilo Ordonezb, and Emmanuel G. Collins, Jr.b aDepartment of Scientific Computing, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA bDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Florida A&M - Florida State University, College of Engineering, Tallahassee, FL, USA ABSTRACT Motion planning for legged machines such as RHex-type robots is far less developed than motion planning for wheeled vehicles. One of the main reasons for this is the lack of kinematic and dynamic models for such platforms. Physics based models are difficult to develop for legged robots due to the difficulty of modeling the robot-terrain interaction and their overall complexity. This paper presents a data driven approach in developing a kinematic model for the X-RHex Lite (XRL) platform. The methodology utilizes a feed-forward neural network to relate gait parameters to vehicle velocities. Keywords: Legged Robots, Kinematic Modeling, Neural Network 1. INTRODUCTION The motion of a legged vehicle is governed by the gait it uses to move. Stable gaits can provide significantly different speeds and types of motion. The goal of this paper is to use a neural network to relate the parameters that define the gait an X-RHex Lite (XRL) robot uses to move to angular, forward and lateral velocities. This is a critical step in developing a motion planner for a legged robot. The approach taken in this paper is very similar to approaches taken to learn forward predictive models for skid-steered robots. For example, this approach was used to learn a forward predictive model for the Crusher UGV (Unmanned Ground Vehicle).1 RHex-type robot may be viewed as a special case of skid-steered vehicle as their rotating C-legs are always pointed in the same direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Domestic Robot Owners Ja-Young Sung1, Rebecca E
    Housewives or Technophiles?: Understanding Domestic Robot Owners Ja-Young Sung1, Rebecca E. Grinter1, Henrik I. Christensen1, Lan Guo2 1 Center for Robotics and Intelligent Machines 2Siemens Medical Solutions Inc. Georgia Institute of Technology 51 Valley Stream Pkwy 85 5th Street, Atlanta GA 30332 USA Malvern, PA 19355 USA {jsung, beki,hic}@cc.gatech.edu [email protected] ABSTRACT Roomba users. Among other domestic robots that serve household Despite the growing body of Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) tasks, such as Scooba, Robomower and Dressman, we selected research focused on domestic robots, surprisingly little is known Roomba for three main reasons. First, Roomba have been very about the demographic profile of robot owners and their influence successful in the United States and that gave us wide accessibility on usage patterns. In this paper, we present the results of a survey to Roomba owners making it easier to recruit a large sample size. of 379 iRobot’s Roomba owners, that identified their Second, Roomba is one of the longest available domestic robots, demographic and usage trends. The outcome of the survey and we hypothesize that its adoption may have gone beyond suggests that Roomba users are equally likely to be men or “early adopters” or leading users, allowing us to capture a broader women, and they tend to be younger with high levels of education range of experiences. Third, and most importantly, Roomba is an and technical backgrounds. Their adoption and use patterns exemplary case for understanding how householders respond to illustrate the important role that gift exchange plays in adoption, robotic products that replace blue-collar work in the home, which and how the robot changes cleaning routines and creates non- some researchers believe to be the future of home robotic cleaning activities.
    [Show full text]
  • AI, Robots, and Swarms: Issues, Questions, and Recommended Studies
    AI, Robots, and Swarms Issues, Questions, and Recommended Studies Andrew Ilachinski January 2017 Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. This document contains the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the sponsor. Distribution Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. Specific authority: N00014-11-D-0323. Copies of this document can be obtained through the Defense Technical Information Center at www.dtic.mil or contact CNA Document Control and Distribution Section at 703-824-2123. Photography Credits: http://www.darpa.mil/DDM_Gallery/Small_Gremlins_Web.jpg; http://4810-presscdn-0-38.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/ Robotics.jpg; http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-edia/image/upload/18kxb5jw3e01ujpg.jpg Approved by: January 2017 Dr. David A. Broyles Special Activities and Innovation Operations Evaluation Group Copyright © 2017 CNA Abstract The military is on the cusp of a major technological revolution, in which warfare is conducted by unmanned and increasingly autonomous weapon systems. However, unlike the last “sea change,” during the Cold War, when advanced technologies were developed primarily by the Department of Defense (DoD), the key technology enablers today are being developed mostly in the commercial world. This study looks at the state-of-the-art of AI, machine-learning, and robot technologies, and their potential future military implications for autonomous (and semi-autonomous) weapon systems. While no one can predict how AI will evolve or predict its impact on the development of military autonomous systems, it is possible to anticipate many of the conceptual, technical, and operational challenges that DoD will face as it increasingly turns to AI-based technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharkninja V Irobot Corporation IPR2020-00734
    [email protected] Paper No. 11 571-272-7822 Entered: October 6, 2020 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD SHARKNINJA OPERATING LLC, SHARKNINJA MANAGEMENT LLC, AND SHARKNINJA SALES COMPANY, Petitioner, v. IROBOT CORPORATION, Patent Owner. IPR2020-00734 Patent 9,921,586 B2 Before TERRENCE W. McMILLIN, AMANDA F. WIEKER, and JASON W. MELVIN, Administrative Patent Judges. MELVIN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 U.S.C. § 314 IPR2020-00734 Patent 9,921,586 B2 I. INTRODUCTION SharkNinja Operating LLC, SharkNinja Management LLC, and SharkNinja Sales Company (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition (Paper 1, “Pet.”) requesting institution of inter partes review of claims 1–19 of U.S. Patent No. 9,921,586 B2 (Ex. 1001, “the ’586 patent”). iRobot Corporation (“Patent Owner”) filed a Preliminary Response. Paper 6. After our email authorization, Petitioner filed a Preliminary Reply (Paper 7) and Patent Owner filed a Preliminary Sur-Reply (Paper 9). Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.4(a), we have authority to determine whether to institute review. An inter partes review may not be instituted unless “the information presented in the petition . and any response . shows that there is a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail with respect to at least 1 of the claims challenged in the petition.” 35 U.S.C. § 314(a). For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that Petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood it will prevail in establishing the unpatentability of at least one challenged claim, and we institute inter partes review.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Robotics: Timeline
    History of Robotics: Timeline This history of robotics is intertwined with the histories of technology, science and the basic principle of progress. Technology used in computing, electricity, even pneumatics and hydraulics can all be considered a part of the history of robotics. The timeline presented is therefore far from complete. Robotics currently represents one of mankind’s greatest accomplishments and is the single greatest attempt of mankind to produce an artificial, sentient being. It is only in recent years that manufacturers are making robotics increasingly available and attainable to the general public. The focus of this timeline is to provide the reader with a general overview of robotics (with a focus more on mobile robots) and to give an appreciation for the inventors and innovators in this field who have helped robotics to become what it is today. RobotShop Distribution Inc., 2008 www.robotshop.ca www.robotshop.us Greek Times Some historians affirm that Talos, a giant creature written about in ancient greek literature, was a creature (either a man or a bull) made of bronze, given by Zeus to Europa. [6] According to one version of the myths he was created in Sardinia by Hephaestus on Zeus' command, who gave him to the Cretan king Minos. In another version Talos came to Crete with Zeus to watch over his love Europa, and Minos received him as a gift from her. There are suppositions that his name Talos in the old Cretan language meant the "Sun" and that Zeus was known in Crete by the similar name of Zeus Tallaios.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Couple Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Portable Magnetic
    International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 11, Issue 1, January-2020 1271 ISSN 2229-5518 Assessment of Couple Unmanned Aerial Vehicle- Portable Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sensor for Precision Agriculture of Crops Balogun Wasiu A., Keshinro K.K, Momoh-Jimoh E. Salami, Adegoke A. S., Adesanya G. E., Obadare Bolatito J Abstract— This paper proposes an improved benefits of integration of Unmanned Aerial vehicle (UAV) and Portable Magnetic Resonance Imaging (PMRI) system in relation to developing Precision Agricultural (PA) that is capable of carrying out a dynamic internal quality assessment of crop developmental stages during pre-harvest period. A comprehensive review was carried out on application of UAV technology to Precision Agriculture (PA) progress and evolving research work on developing a Portable MRI system. The disadvantages of using traditional way of obtaining Precision Agricultural (PA) were shown. Proposed Model Architecture of Coupled Unmanned Aerial vehicle (UAV) and Portable Magnetic Resonance Imaging (PMRI) System were developed and the advantages of the proposed system were displayed. It is predicted that the proposed method can be useful for Precision Agriculture (PA) which will reduce the cost implication of Pre-harvest processing of farm produce based on non-destructive technique. Index Terms— Unmanned Aerial vehicle, Portable Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Precision Agricultural, Non-destructive, Pre-harvest, Crops, Imaging, Permanent magnet —————————— —————————— 1 INTRODUCTION URING agricultural processing, quality control ensure Inspection of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) for harvesting is a rig- that food products meet certain quality and safety stand- orous assignment which can be overlooked or applied physi- D ards in a developed country [FAO]. Low profits in fruit cal counting that are usually not accurate or precise (Sham- farming are subjected by pre- and post-harvest factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Geting (Parakilas and Bryce, 2018; ICRC, 2019; Abaimov and Martellini, 2020)
    Journal of Future Robot Life -1 (2021) 1–24 1 DOI 10.3233/FRL-200019 IOS Press Algorithmic fog of war: When lack of transparency violates the law of armed conflict Jonathan Kwik ∗ and Tom Van Engers Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1001NA, Netherlands Abstract. Underinternationallaw,weapon capabilitiesand theiruse areregulated by legalrequirementsset by International Humanitarian Law (IHL).Currently,there arestrong military incentivestoequip capabilitieswith increasinglyadvanced artificial intelligence (AI), whichinclude opaque (lesstransparent)models.As opaque models sacrifice transparency for performance, it is necessary toexaminewhether theiruse remainsinconformity with IHL obligations.First,wedemon- strate that theincentivesfor automationdriveAI toward complextaskareas and dynamicand unstructuredenvironments, whichinturnnecessitatesresorttomore opaque solutions.Wesubsequently discussthe ramifications of opaque models for foreseeability andexplainability.Then, we analysetheir impact on IHLrequirements froma development, pre-deployment and post-deployment perspective.We findthatwhile IHL does not regulate opaqueAI directly,the lack of foreseeability and explainability frustratesthe fulfilmentofkey IHLrequirementstotheextent that theuse of fully opaqueAI couldviolate internationallaw.Statesare urgedtoimplement interpretability duringdevelopmentand seriously consider thechallenging complicationofdetermining theappropriate balancebetween transparency andperformance in their capabilities. Keywords:Transparency, interpretability,foreseeability,weapon,
    [Show full text]
  • Variety of Research Work Has Already Been Done to Develop an Effective Navigation Systems for Unmanned Ground Vehicle
    Design of a Smart Unmanned Ground Vehicle for Hazardous Environments Saurav Chakraborty Subhadip Basu Tyfone Communications Development (I) Pvt. Ltd. Computer Science & Engineering. Dept. ITPL, White Field, Jadavpur University Bangalore 560092, INDIA. Kolkata – 700032, INDIA Abstract. A smart Unmanned Ground Vehicle needs some organizing principle, based on the (UGV) is designed and developed for some characteristics of each system such as: application specific missions to operate predominantly in hazardous environments. In The purpose of the development effort our work, we have developed a small and (often the performance of some application- lightweight vehicle to operate in general cross- specific mission); country terrains in or without daylight. The The specific reasons for choosing a UGV UGV can send visual feedbacks to the operator solution for the application (e.g., hazardous at a remote location. Onboard infrared sensors environment, strength or endurance can detect the obstacles around the UGV and requirements, size limitation etc.); sends signals to the operator. the technological challenges, in terms of functionality, performance, or cost, posed by Key Words. Unmanned Ground Vehicle, the application; Navigation Control, Onboard Sensor. The system's intended operating area (e.g., indoor environments, anywhere indoors, 1. Introduction outdoors on roads, general cross-country Robotics is an important field of interest in terrain, the deep seafloor, etc.); modern age of automation. Unlike human being the vehicle's mode of locomotion (e.g., a computer controlled robot can work with speed wheels, tracks, or legs); and accuracy without feeling exhausted. A robot How the vehicle's path is determined (i.e., can also perform preassigned tasks in a control and navigation techniques hazardous environment, reducing the risks and employed).
    [Show full text]
  • Robotics Irobot Corp. (IRBT)
    Robotics This report is published for educational purposes only by students competing in the Boston Security Analysts Society (BSAS) Boston Investment iRobot Corp. (IRBT) Research Challenge. 12/13/2010 Ticker: IRBT Recommendation: Sell Price: $22.84 Price Target: $15.20-16.60 Market Profile Figure 1.1: iRobot historical stock price Shares O/S 25 mm 25 Current price $22.84 52 wk price range $14.45-$23.00 20 Beta 1.86 iRobot 3 mo ADTV 0.14 mm 15 Short interest 2.1 mm Market cap $581mm 10 Debt 0 S & P 500 (benchmarked Jan-09) P/10E 25.2x 5 EV/10 EBITDA 13.5x Instl holdings 57.8% 0 Jan-09 Apr-09 Jul-09 Oct-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 Oct-10 Insider holdings 12.5% Valuation Ranges iRobot is a SELL: The company’s high valuation reflects overly optimistic expectations for home and military robot sales. While we are bullish on robotics, iRobot’s 52 wk range growth story has run out of steam. • Consensus is overestimating future home robot sales: Rapid yoy growth in 2010 home robot Street targets sales is the result of one-time penetration of international markets, which has concealed declining domestic sales. Entry into new markets drove growth in home robot sales in Q4 2009 and Q1 2010, 20-25x P/2011E but international sales have fallen 4% since Q1 this year, and we believe the street is overestimating international growth in 2011 (30% vs. our estimate of 18%). Domestic sales were down 29% in 8-12x Terminal 2009 and are up only 2.5% ytd.
    [Show full text]
  • Increasing the Trafficability of Unmanned Ground Vehicles Through Intelligent Morphing
    Increasing the Trafficability of Unmanned Ground Vehicles through Intelligent Morphing Siddharth Odedra 1, Dr Stephen Prior 1, Dr Mehmet Karamanoglu 1, Dr Siu-Tsen Shen 2 1Product Design and Engineering, Middlesex University Trent Park Campus, Bramley Road, London N14 4YZ, U.K. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 2Department of Multimedia Design, National Formosa University 64 Wen-Hua Road, Hu-Wei 63208, YunLin County, Taiwan R.O.C. [email protected] Abstract Unmanned systems are used where humans are either 2. UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLES unable or unwilling to operate, but only if they can perform as Unmanned Ground Vehicles can be defined as good as, if not better than us. Systems must become more mechanised systems that operate on ground surfaces and autonomous so that they can operate without assistance, relieving the burden of controlling and monitoring them, and to do that they serve as an extension of human capabilities in unreachable need to be more intelligent and highly capable. In terms of ground or unsafe areas. They are used for many things such as vehicles, their primary objective is to be able to travel from A to B cleaning, transportation, security, exploration, rescue and where the systems success or failure is determined by its mobility, bomb disposal. UGV’s come in many different for which terrain is the key element. This paper explores the configurations usually defined by the task at hand and the concept of creating a more autonomous system by making it more environment they must operate in, and are either remotely perceptive about the terrain, and with reconfigurable elements, controlled by the user, pre-programmed to carry out specific making it more capable of traversing it.
    [Show full text]