Background Brief No. 12 EUC Background Brief No. May 2014
INFOSPECTIVE ON THE
EUROPEAN ELECTIONS
AND THE EUROPEAN
PARLIAMENT
Dexter Lee & Devi Shree Malarvanan
EU Centre in Singapore
Contents
Introduction 1
History of Treaty Changes
2
Strengthening of Parliament’s Powers 3
European Elections (1979-2009) 4
State of the Political Groups 11
The 2014 European Elections 12
The European Parliament and European Elections 1
.
- a . in
to to
the the
and
and of also The 60% pan
being for
social
social
states major .
during
Union steadily
of on
highlight took election lack compete common
overview order
change European European over
have
tended -
The
to
a
to
.
in personalities parties, the been project
pan
elections, each
few member
quick Parliament of
and questions
2009
has debates slightly
a European order of
and
s 2000
integration,
develop
few place prominence parties
to in
summary 2014 in
elections first
the unemployment, in
to
with and
from
issues,
led
in a elections
European because
occupied very
- of
issues
the turnout integration
gained turnout. European
addition
put
However, pan begin Yet, European European and have 1990s
elections began policy have Parliament - the beginning
key
upcoming
the
European
.
voter
issues .
election,
affairs as
will
were on pan positions the
and
of
the 2009. that 1994 declining provides with the
on the 2007
issues in
European
first crisis direct
of in parties
such
throughout brief
for level of the
allow
1979 foreign creation
and
stance
the
the
issues also to during
43% job trend interest
leadership
“demos”
since
in
issues even national Furthermore, expansion some
elections 2004 the
first since
to
.
the for 2007 economic and national development
surfaced
of
about European European brief
on of
and
common in
background
later
the the
1979 1995,
Photo: thisis1979.blogspot.com Photo: Sources: Parliament European Sources: at rules their reverse welfare Also, manifestos heightened severe in asked highlight phases running the “electioneering” declining some policy campaigning focus issues The European elections in European of This The the place
- ) in
of to an by for
the the the the the
the the the see and Act had
that role
This
now
basis
Paris
while
The Institutional Triangle .
as
ECSC is Firstly, we at for further of Simone the
(
process of
push .
failed
and and
with
and
the Veil,
extended . Secondly, European European European Assembly life,
of
Parliament
.
Council
stones “federalist” accordance
importance initially Union and Conference
legislator
Parliament
and what -
more a
Parliamentary Parliamentary
in 1976. the the
stood its limited were co Treaty
the
1986 the to institutions, of
gradual
for
Parliament’s Council Ministers relationship body
Simone
Union,
the a 1970 of leaders
legitimacy
provided
responsible The of the
of Assembly key
began Summit economic
beforehand Community
in Common the were
.
European
accordance the
European
and In was that Treaties
now
), 1982 European created
treaty powers
fledged
foundation . development plan increase evolved
in the
Act
to and but a were
three the
the
the September foster
political
. the
Steel European this
to to
is , full- the
s 1970
which
the has convictions
Council system
the on
act President
of
European in
of today a draft by Commission,
Spinelli
to
Rome
to Common while the
Assembly and
and it
and parliamentary
refers
and to the
stipulated ECSC Community 1992.
early laid
elected, political
budgetary
1979 powers this
of led
the
now voting Ministers on
the
of Special
the
replaced European Union – European has
of be
attempts
the power , 1975 triangle 1970 the
1958.
is with
woman the
of Coal tirelessly
Altiero
Assembly
of
Union
elections
by Authority Rome in in the 1974
in European
, 1952 social,
that triangle
response do of expanding (from
Indeed,
Treaty
of until
later like after Treaty
. first
uniform
Union integration
would
Body Single
a create
in of to
the
division
a
conferred
Parliamentary
worked Council
European the to High
Authority,
as
to institution
the blocked 1958
Council
European
the growth
came
the had
powers
European
institutional parliament’s
Treaty
European
the
the
European
December
with
powers the
each Advisory
governs the
institutional Parliamentary
Commission, High Special the The
Communities
when Assembly
functioning signed
as The
founded European
Maastricht for
European Spinelli
in forefront
Parliament Veil,
on of
to strengthened institutions
federalists also,
Assembly the The agree were
from Introduction
that The
only the
th of
of by a
in
be 10 for
the the the and were state
.
for
Single 1984. 434.
number
Europe
of and up as
European
in
to
European proposed
September Politicamente Club’
principle
Spinelli the
1979. authority
20 decisions first in elections
committee
by
club Jan 1981 for the federal and proposal MEPs a
integration
market,
on Establishing
opened
the
a Member general Greece Accession increased of member
the major Associazione on Parliament
that
Crocodile
a basis
and the 9
united
European draft
the . . NATO Photo:
the a Parliament Treaty which : Photo 410
with as Brussels
legitimacy in . ‘The common the
European
1986) 1986)
to direct
by
1992. introduced
the
of
in 1978,
treaty . .
ECSC Union, of of
the
up new 1974 on
1986 Parliament Parliament
parliament
‘Draft July was
by the
suffrage
deeper
states for .
elected Union new set European together to Elected Formed
signed
of e
on
.
- (1907 provided accepted i
Treaty )
and Advocate • •
European Jun 1979 Jun
Act and were Union’ legislation
Parliament
force plan MEPs
Plan’ borders ( member European Members universal elected European the
establishing
the
into on
Maastricht
Spinelli suffrage and national
with gave
Spinelli the Parliament national European European ‘ Spinelli’s
for December Sheets
Act • •
entered increased
Parliament
. Treaty of Paris
Fact universal
of . The
4)
Act
expands .
Denmark
Altiero it 3.
in
.
or Jan 1973 the the 1.
198. this the
( provisions
direct 1979. EEC UK, Ireland members to
of
suffrage Member
acquired by
designate
while
June
States, since
in
suffrage Parliament
10 parliament and Community gave
to
“Parliamentary
nature
framework introduction
up
Summit Parliament
and the universal
Elections
life.
7 the
Member set
of Renamed
“European the universal by other Parliament”
national
President Jan 1962 European subsequently on
all
of
originally
Parliament’
with renamed whether
President ofPresident the
and
by the
own
former direct
European place
)
to
- elected of
then female representative . 2002, by
on opponents the (later
Paris their creation
in 1979. Elected Elected European Parliament forefrontAt the of European the expanding Parliament’s role in European social, political and economic
Photo: minniebeaniste.wordpress.com
national Assembly took
.
. delegated
the 142 Act
First • • the
of
ratification from
elections
directly founded picked
Parliamentary firmest choice
election
and 1958) is representation revised
its Assembly
elections in the
Mar 1957
‘European
direct them
states was the
Parliaments by numbered members EEC The Assembly
1962.
Treaty Fontainebleau : Evolution of Evolution Parliament :
Following
on
undermined Parliamentary
Decision Act name
76 have
the first
meets proportional Assembly” Common also eliminated The introducing the The Member January taken
At The
The States representatives 1976. to Parliament
.
with Common
the
Simone Veil Simone Veil (1927
Key Figures Key
.
Timelime Sep 1952
for
ECSC Assembly members time
History of Treaty Changes 2
3
.
th as
Strengthening of Parliament’s Powers 28 state
joins
.
a
in of increased : EU’s
the the the the the also
gave
by
there 766.
Jul 2013 Jul
of ; of Article with
fields Council Croatia the member to MEPs and
required EC),
over
European
procedure
where procedure
and which (right)
the
the
assent
was of 190 the results
in 47 the
and
However, strengthened after
of areas President
. . with site.eu control
the
- strengthened combined and Treaty
decision join
uniform
-
procedure, increased the of
a Justice the 191) been 42
co (Article
736
article unanimity
was of
were all
of
. Parliament's
www.ep
partner
18, Jan 2007 the
account
president have to adopt to to Romania Bulgaria MEPs EU Number
same Article decision
powers - Maastricht . where to Court
suffrage
the equal cf into powers when co
(
the
its
the an
(Articles
and http:// applied in subject powers
procedure
areas
the 732
MEPs in
elect
power
appointment nations
Eastern taking its of
footing
parties
Southern to
European cases
universal EU,
the
become
included
increasing - Parliament's and number
new
the decision
four .
equal existing scope -
legislative
procedure decision)
May 2004 May agreements - has process
Council,
direct power political In
was co
. the now 10 and European join thus the Treaty.
(co
by
the the other to
citizens
the
in MEPs procedure of
decision its
Parliament practically - join
The . majority with
a
European for European .
of
co association Parliament
and Council
added
Finland
extended
approval, No
Maastricht on
increased the pan- .
and the Parliament
the
eyes
was
decision
time
- the
Sweden EU
statute by Council European unchanged)
to
qualified
Lisbon,
co
the
.
626
Jan 1995 further
with .
Parliament of
by the in over policy,
and the to MEPs Austria,
develop
under
the legislators single made in -
EU Parliament’s a to principles
co powers . Lisbon
enlargement to
elections Treaty
for to remained the bases
of changes
on procedure
MEPs decisions .
Commission,
:
European of adopt
for 567
the
decision
cooperation
. proposal
extended legal
to
became competition
of common
to measures of
a the
take
which
legislative
unification
subject for
Treaty
214)
various of
to . decision election Members and
-
legislative
European force adopt and legitimacy of existing
co
EP
agreements
Council possible
Jun 1994 Jun made procedure
policy, allowing unanimous basis to th to the
limited,
affairs
to it
15
provides
German 4 account increased
Number
the a
(Article into
Amsterdam
if
the
Nice to
to
the procedure the
was
for permitted of
undergone of
a
to statute agriculture
home and
real, to power
on entry
powers
subject making
. power cultural Treaty
Spain provision MEPs was
has comes increase
control for
Community
and elections
and
the of it not no
on new Treaty
to
of Treaty increases of extended
basis
regard
Lisbon
still Portugal
justice
executive was gave Commission The Parliament The were requirement Council 151 when Parliament With Except Making Introducing
legal
Jan 1986
518.
was
A The
Power
Commission With
European Community’s Election
• • • Legislative
attempt •
• • • Parliament
The European Parliament then and now. Photo Sources: German Federal Archive (left) (left) Archive Federal German Sources: then and Photo now. Parliament The European
europarl.europa.eu website official in 2 page and Parliament’s The 3 information from the European sourced is to
and EC number Accession Elections 1979 Main Issues:
Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Seats Disenchantment with CAP due to the perception that it imposes a burden on the 410 Community budget
Working Hours Proposals to reduce working hours to 35hours per week within a European Electorate Framework 191.7 million
Gender Issues Principle of equal pay in 1976 Council Directive that called for equal treatment of men and women not fully applied. Many Turnout member states addressed the question of 61.99% gender equality. Expectations of the European Parliament to play a dynamic role in developing directives to fight gender inequalities were high, especially now that it is being elected by universal suffrage. Post-Election
Environment Issues Media coverage and public opinion A series of environmental issues such as following the elections suggest no reduction of nuclear energy usage were on significant rise in the visibility of the the table. There were calls to look for parliament despite the direct election. solutions to these issues on a supranational level. The European Parliament became more assertive; especially in relation to the Results Council • In December 1979, the European RGN IDN Parliament (EP) used its power under 11 9 Article 203 of the Treaty of Rome to NC veto proposals 22 LIB • In December 1982: the EP blocked the SOC Supplementary Budget 40 113 Party Groups LEFT Confederation of Socialist Parties (SOC) 44 European People’s Party (EPP) European Democrats (ED) ED EPP Communists/Far-Left (LEFT) 107 Liberals and Liberal Democats (LIB) 64 National Conservatives (NC) Heterogeneous/Regionalists (RGN) Sources: European Parliament, European Council and Independents (IDN) 4 Europe-politique.eu
Elections 1984 Context
Recession In the years preceding the elections Issues (1981-1983) member states such as the UK and Ireland were hit by a recession. Renationalisation of Entry of the Greens The 1984 elections mark the first time campaigns that the Greens enter the European Transnational issues Parliament scene. They have been represented in the European Parliament take a backseat ever since.
The EC’s first expansion Greece became the 10th member state Electorate of the Community in 1981. 200.5 million Results
G&R FAR IDN 20 16 9 NC 29 SOC Seats LIB 130 Turnout 31 434 58.98% LEFT 41 ED EPP 50 110
Confederation of Socialist Parties (SOC) Liberals and Liberal Democats (LIB) European People’s Party (EPP) National Conservatives (NC) European Democrats (ED) Greens and Regionalists (G&R) Communists/Far-Left (LEFT) Far-Right Parties (FAR) Independents (IDN)
Sources: European Parliament, European Council and Europe-politique.eu 5 Main Issues
Despite the significance of the Single European Act that provided the foundation for the creation of the Single Context Market with four freedoms, pan- European issues were not particularly discussed either. In 1987, two years before
the elections, the A survey showed that : Single European • 72% of people felt unemployment Act was adopted and as was one of the important issues • 39% considered environmental consequent of this act, protection to be an important issue 1992 was set as the too deadline for the creation • Only 8% chose the realization of the of a single market. Single European Market as an important point to be discussed during the elections 1989 Sources: European Parliament and Voters’ Study of the European Elections Study 1989 1994 Context Issues The Treaty of Maastricht was • Greater attention devoted to ratified and came into force European issues in these elections. in November 1993 thereby Greatest amount of debate in creating the European Union Denmark, France, and Great Britain. (EU).
• The ratification of the Maastricht The European Economic Treaty was an important point of Area came into force in campaign in all states January 1994.
• Growing tendency by the political The reunification of Germany parties to use common manifestos in 1990 and the fall of Communism in Eastern
Europe saw a wave of new • Unemployment and environmental applications by European issues were once again discussed states to join the EU. during these elections
Sources: European Parliament and European Commission 6 Party Groups
Confederation of Socialist Parties FAR (SOC) RGN IDN NAT 17 European People’s Party (EPP) 13 12 20 Liberals and Liberal Democrats (LIB) Communists/Far-Left (LEFT) GRE European Democrats (ED) The Greens (GRE) 30 National Conservatives (NAT) SOC Far-Right (FAR) ED 180 Regionalists (RGN) 34 Independents (IDN) LEFT 42
LIB Electorate Turnout 49 EPP 244.9m 58.5% 121 Total Seats: 518 Sources: European Parliament and Europe-politique.eu Results 1989
Electorate Results 1994 269.2 million SCP IDN ERA 19 27 19 Turnout GRE 56.8% 20 EDA 30 PES Party Groups FE 198 Party of European Socialists (PES) 27 European People’s Party (EPP) LEFT Liberals and Lib Dems (ELDR) Communists/Far-Left (LEFT) 28 Forza Europa Conservatives (FE) LIB European Democats (EDA) 43 The Greens (GRE) EPP Radical Liberals (ERA) 157 Eurosceptics (SCE) Independents (IDN) Total Seats 567
Sources: European Parliament and Europe-politique.eu 7 Context
• The Amsterdam Treaty of 1997, which entered into force in May 1999, opened more legislation to co-decision and confirmed the EP’s role in approving the Elect European Commission President.
• Creation of the Euro: Public opinion on the single currency was favourable
• Emergence of the Green Parties as a “fourth” force, and increasing salience of 1999 environmental issues.
Issues Prevalence of national issues over European issues when EP elections held in conjunction with Electorate regional or local elections/referendums, particularly in Belgium, Luxembourg, Spain and Ireland 300,000,000
Major national level issue for voters include unemployment, the transfer of jobs abroad and fighting poverty and social exclusion.
Major EU-level issues include: • Desired accountability of European Central Turnout Seats Bank vis-a-vis the European Parliament, • Confidence in European Commission – a May 1999 poll indicated that 53 percent of 49.51% 626 Europeans had little or no confidence in the European Commission which came in the wake of a corruption scandal in the Commission. • Debate on deepening or widening of the EU were prominent in both UK and France
Party Groups
European People’s European Greens Party (EPP) (GRE) Party of European National Socialists (PES) Conservatives (NC) European Liberals European United Results (ELDR) Left (Left) Eurosceptics (AEN) Independents and Others (ID) EPP PES
ELDR AEN GRE Left NC 233 50 ID 180 48 42 16 31 29
8 Sources: European Parliament, Eurobarometer 51 and Europe-politique.eu Issues The Constitutional Treaty and Turkey’s prospective EU membership was widely discussed in virtually all member states. Issues related to foreign policy and security, such as ions military non-alignment and the US occupation in Iraq were more prominent in the older member states in Western Europe, while national interest issues were more prominent in the new EU member states from Central and Eastern Europe. 2004 The European party groups (EPP, PES and ELDR) reflected their support for the Constitutional Treaty and an expanded Europe in their manifestos, but lack of proper debate on European integration by these parties. Electorate Context Negotiations on the Constitutional Treaty, 342,000,000 which was first conceived in December 2001 by the European Council, were concluded in June 2004 by the Irish Presidency of the European Union.
The ascension of eight new member states from Central and Eastern Europe and two from Southern Europe on 1st May 2014 brought the number of EU member states to 25. The Seats Turnout number of MEPs increased from 626 to 732 as agreed in the EU’s Constitution Treaty, with 45.6% 151 seats contested by parties in these new 732 member states.
The Treaty of Nice capped the number of seats in the European Parliament at 732. Party Groups European People’s Party (EPP) Party of European Socialists (PES) European Liberals (ELDR) European Greens (Greens) Results National Conservatives (NC) European United Left (UL) Eurosceptics (AEN) EPP Independents (ID) PES ELDR UL GRE 200 268 ID AEN 88 NC 42 27 29 37 41 Sources: European Parliament, EPIN Working Paper 11 (May 2004) and Europe-politique.eu 9 ELECTIONS 2009 Issues Context
Which issues mattered to voters The financial and debt crises in the EU, and in which member unfolded in 2009 when a number states were they prominently of EU member states asked for discussed? bailouts from the European Union. Both Ireland and Spain European Integration & Identity were in recession at the time of the elections.
• The 2007 Treaty of Lisbon: Electorate Institutionalised the European Council meetings and created The Economy 385.6m the position of a permanent President of the European Council. • Further empowered the European Parliament • Created the position of a High The Environment Seats Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy 732 supported by the European Social Policy and Integration External Action Service. • Allowed for the possibility of a member state withdrawing Turnout from the EU. Turkey’s EU Aspirations 43% Also, new rules proposed by the European Commission to allow pan-European political groupings Results to compete at the national level were made law in 2007. S&D 184 Party Groups EPP European People’s Party (EPP) 265 Socialists and Democrats (S&D) Alliance of Liberals and ALDE Democrats of Europe (ALDE) 84 European Greens (EGP) European Conservatives EGP and Reformists (ECR) 55 European United Left (LEFT) Europe for Freedom and Democracy (EFD) ECR NI Other Parties (NI) 54 19 EFD 32 LEFT Sources: European Parliament, Europa.eu, Europe-politique.eu and 10 35 EUDO-EUI 2009 Elections to the European Parliament Country Report European People’s Party Party of European Socialists EPP The European People’s Party (EPP) is a centre-right The Party of European Socialists (PES) is the PES European political group that was founded on 8 main social democratic political group in July 1976 in Luxembourg by French MP Jean the European Union. PES first started out as Seitlinger, the then Belgian Prime Minister Leo a loose group of centre-left parties in the Tindemans (was also elected as the party’s first 1960s, before being inaugurated as the president) and the later Belgian Prime Minister Confederation of the Socialist Parties of the and EPP President Wilfried Martens. The party has European Community (SOC) in 1973 after contested all European elections since 1979, and it the accession of Denmark, the UK and was enlarged in 2002 after the European Ireland into the EC. The party adopted its Democrat Union (EDU) successfully negotiated a current name in 1992 after the formation of merger with the party. the European Union, and it sits as the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and The EPP has consistently stood for freedom, Democrats group (S&D) in the European democracy, respect for traditions and associations, Parliament. the principle of subsidiary and a Social Market Economy. The party has is also known for As a social democratic alliance, the PES has advocating deeper European integration in areas stood firm on ideals such as the protection such as the completion of the single market, the of workers' and human rights, equal pay, integration of immigrants, the continued equality and diversity. The party is a enlargement of the EU and a direct election for proponent of European integration, and in the European Commission President. recent times, has advocated for a "Social Europe" that calls for governments to work towards fair redistribution of wealth and the setting of binding targets on employment, education and social STATE OF cohesion. THE POLITICAL GROUPS European Green Party Alliance of Liberals & Democrats for Europe The European Green Party started out as a Coordination of European Green and Radical ALDE ALDE The ALDE is a European political group Parties (CEGRP) prior to the 1979 election, comprising 57 national-level liberal parties from though no Green MP entered the European across Europe. European Liberal parties first Parliament in that year. The Greens then set formed a political confederation in 1976, before up a European Green Coordination (EGC) in embarking on a name change of the group to 1984, winning 11 seats in that election. It was the European Liberal Democrat and Reform only in 1989 were the Greens able to form Party (ELDR) in 1994. The ELDR then partnered their parliamentary group in the European with the European People's Party-European Parliament, and in 1999 they replaced the Democrats Group in the 1999-2004 European European Left as the fourth largest party Parliament to form a grand coalition, and in group in the European Parliament. 2004, the party registered itself as a political entity and absorbed MEPs from the European The Greens champion the basic tenets of Democratic Party. The party had adopted its Green politics such as environmental current name in 2012 to match the pan- responsibility, individual freedom, inclusive European alliance and parliamentary group of democracy, diversity, social justice, gender the same name. equality, sustainable development and non- violence. The party initially advocated the Since its formation, the ALDE has often formation of a neutral and decentralised espoused the principles of democracy, the rule Europe, though from 1999 onwards it has of law, human rights, individualism and proposed pragmatic alternatives to the EU's tolerance, and has strongly supported the policies and institutions. enlargement of the European Union as well as free trade. Sources: EPP.eu, Party of European Socialists 2014 Manifesto, ALDE.eu and Europeangreens.eu 11 20Front JEAN-CLAUDE Context The 2014 European Elections will be held between 22 and 25 May 2014 in the 28 member states of the European Union. Juncker European People’s Party (EPP) Voters will indirectly elect the European Commission – According to the Lisbon Trea t y, the European Parliament is empowered to elect the President of the European Commission on the basis of a proposal of the European Council taking into account the election results. The European political groups have each nominated a candidate for the Commission presidency.
The partisan electoral contest for Commission President has led for the first time to television debates where candidates for the Commission Presidency would face each other in April and May. Candidates also hit the road to campaign for votes.
There is a rise of “hard” Eurosceptic and far- right parties in Europe in the midst of economic crisis as Europeans give greater backing to far-right parties – an increase in hard Eurosceptic MEPs in EP could pose problems Aged 60, Juncker was one of the longest serving for other EU institutions such as the Council and Prime Ministers of Luxembourg (1995-2013) and has experience chairing the Eurogroup of finance Commission. ministers during the recent financial and debt crisis. Juncker is a strong supporter of European Also, will turnout drop further or will the new integration and the Union’s social justice agenda. changes to EP’s powers encourage more voters Other Candidates to turn out?
Electorate 400,000,000 Seats 751 Guy Verhofstadt Alexis Tsipras Alliance of Liberals Party of the and Democrats of European Left Sources: elections2014.eu, European Parliament, 12 European Council, epp.eu, pes.eu, euobserver.com Europe (ALDE)
Issues The topic of European integration is expected to be one of the biggest issues in these elections and all European parties have addressed their plans for Europe in their manifestos. However, 60% of Europeans do not trust the EU and anti-EU feelings are on the rise, making the task of getting voters to the polls even tougher. 14runners MARTIN Eurosceptic and far-right parties are hoping to capitalise on the surge of nationalism to gain more seats in the European Parliament. The French National Front (FN), the United Kingdom Schulz Independence Party (UKIP) and the Dutch PVV are Party of European Socialists calling for national control over immigration, while Germany’s Alternative für Deutchland (AfD) and (PES) Italy’s Five Star Movement (MF5) are calling for their countries to exit the Eurozone.
Economy and social policy remains a prominent issues: outgoing MEPs call for a new narrative that binds Europeans together in a globalised world with the PES campaigning on building a social union with effective integration policies There is a desire among Europe’s youth for education schemes on rights and identity as EU citizens.
Lastly, the recent crisis in Ukraine has overshadowed other national concerns in Poland, and is expected to feature strongly in the election campaigns in the EU’s Baltic states as well as in Bulgaria. Ones to watch
A former aspiring football player, German Martin “No” to electoral threshold in Germany Schulz has worked through the ranks of Germany’s Social Democratic Party (SPD) and was first elected to Germany’s Constitutional Court annulled the the European Parliament in 1994. He served as its Bundestag’s decision on a 3% electoral threshold, President from 2012 to 2013, and is an ardent opening the door for the 15 month old anti-Euro champion of human rights, reform of financial Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) to gain its first markets, deeper European integration and seats in these upcoming elections. promotion of economic growth in the EU away from austerity. First-place finishes for FN and UKIP Opinion polls suggest that Marine Le Pen’s Front The Alliance of European National (FN) and Nigel Farage’s UKIP will come Conservatives & out tops in France and the UK respectively. If these Reformists (ECR), Le Pen polls are accurate, this will be the first time that and Wilders’ new mainstream parties in both these EU member European Alliance for states will fail to clinch first place. Freedom (EAF) and the Europe of Freedom and Crisis in Ukraine Ska Keller & José Bové Democracy Group (EFD) The ongoing Ukraine crisis has prompted fresh all declined to present a (Joint Candidates) debate on Poland’s security issues and is set to candidate for the ensure that the centre-right Civic Platform will European Green Party Commission Presidency. come out tops in these elections. 13
Established in 2008, the European Union Centre in Singapore is a joint project of the European Union, the National University of Singapore (NUS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU) and the Singapore Institute of International Affairs (SIIA), and is part of a worldwide network of EU centres and EU institutes. We aim to promote knowledge and understanding of the EU and its impact on Singapore and the region, through activities revolving around outreach, education and research. As part of our public outreach activities, the Centre organises an ongoing series of talks, lectures and seminars. The Centre contributes to education and research on the EU through organising academic conferences and by publishing background briefs, working papers, and policy and research briefs.
Copyright ©2014 EU Centre in Singapore
www.eucentre.sg
2