DOCSLIB.ORG

The Fourth Crusade (1000)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Fourth Crusade (1000) The Fourth Crusade The real author of the Fourth Crusade was the famous pope, Innocent III. Young, enthusiastic, and ambitious for the glory of the Papacy, he revived the plans of Pope Urban II and sought once more to unite the forces of Christendom against Islam. No emperor or king answered his summons, but a number of knights (chiefly French) took the crusader's vow. None of the Crusades, after the Third, effected much in the Holy Land; either their force was spent before reaching it, or they were diverted from their purpose by different objects and ambitions. The crusaders of the Fourth expedition captured Constantinople instead of Jerusalem. The Crusaders and the Venetians! The leaders of the crusade decided to make Egypt their objective point, since this country was then the center of the Moslem power. Accordingly, the crusaders proceeded to Venice, for the purpose of securing transportation across the Mediterranean. The Venetians agreed to furnish the necessary ships only on condition that the crusaders first seized Zara on the eastern coast of the Adriatic. Zara was a Christian city, but it was also a naval and commercial rival of Venice. In spite of the pope's protests the crusaders besieged and captured the city. Even then they did not proceed against the Moslems. The Venetians persuaded them to turn their arms against Constantinople. The possession of that great capital would greatly increase Venetian trade and influence in the East; for the crusading nobles it held out endless opportunities of acquiring wealth and power. Thus it happened that these soldiers of the Cross, pledged to war with the Moslems, attacked a Christian city, which for centuries had formed the chief bulwark of Europe against the Arab and the Turk. The Sack of Constantinople in 1204! The crusaders, now better styled the invaders, took Constantinople by storm. No "infidels" could have treated in worse fashion this home of ancient civilization. They burned down a great part of it; they slaughtered the inhabitants; they wantonly destroyed monuments, statues, paintings, and manuscripts - the accumulation of a thousand years. Much of the movable wealth they carried away. Never, declared an eye-witness of the scene, had there been such plunder since the world began. The Wealth of Constantinople! The victors hastened to divide between them the lands of the Roman Empire in the East. Venice gained some districts in Greece, together with nearly all the Aegean islands. The chief crusaders formed part of the remaining territory into the Latin Empire of Constantinople. It was organized in fiefs, after the feudal manner. There was a prince of Achaia, a duke of Athens, a marquis of Corinth, and a count of Thebes. Baldwin, Count of Flanders, was crowned Emperor of the East. Large districts, both in Europe and Asia, did not acknowledge, however, these "Latin" rulers. The new empire lived less than sixty years. At the end of this time the Greeks returned to power. Consequences of the Fourth Crusade! Constantinople, after the Fourth Crusade, declined in strength and could no longer cope with the barbarians menacing it. Two centuries later the city fell an easy victim to the Turks. The responsibility for the disaster which gave the Turks a foothold in Europe rests on the heads of the Venetians and the French nobles. Their greed and lust for power turned the Fourth Crusade into a political adventure. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Crisis of the Fourth Crusade in Byzantium (1203-1204) and the Emergence of Networks for Anti-Latin Reaction and Political Action
    The Crisis of the Fourth Crusade in Byzantium (1203-1204) and the Emergence of Networks for Anti-Latin Reaction and Political Action Ilias GIARENIS In spite of a great number of important publications on the relevant issues,1 the Fourth Crusade and its impact in the Eastern Mediterranean are often – even nowadays – neither fully apprehended nor sufficiently explained. Important aspects of the rich scientific debate still are the collapse of the Byzantine state, the formation of smaller political entities, and the processes through which such immense changes took place. As is well known, the two most prominent among those successor polities were the States of Nicaea and of Epirus, which were both established mainly by members of the high Byzantine Constantinopolitan aristocracy;2 neverheless, the empire of Trebizond, where the imperial legacy of the Komnenoi had been considered as a solid ground for the Grand Komnenoi rulership, should also not be neglected in the study of the historical framework.3 The events of 1203/1204 led to the conquest of Constantinople by the Latin Crusaders, the milites Christi of the Fourth Crusade who had reached the Byzantine capital in a “diversion” from the declared original destination of the Crusade, i.e. Jerusalem. The latter, a Sacred *This paper is dedicated to Nikolaos G. Moschonas. 1 See D. E. Queller and Th. F. Madden, The Fourth Crusade. The Conquest of Constantinople, second edition, Philadelphia 1997; M Angold, The Fourth Crusade. Event and Context, [The Medieval World] Harlow 2003; J. Phillips, The Fourth Crusade and the Sack of Constantinople, London 2004; Urbs Capta.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION the Capture of Constantinople by the Armies of the Fourth Crusade in 1204 Fragmented the Byzantine Empire. Territor
    INTRODUCTION The capture of Constantinople by the armies of the Fourth Crusade in 1204 fragmented the Byzantine empire. Territories which did not submit to the Crusaders fell into the hands of Byzantine magnates who became rulers of numerous small political entities. The most important of these newly founded states, which each claimed to be the successor of the destroyed Byzantine empire, were the empires of Trebizond and Nicaea in Asia Minor and the principality of Epiros in the Balkans.1 The so-called empire of Nicaea, which was established as a viable state by Theodore I Laskaris (1204–1221), was the most suc- cessful of these. Laskaris averted the threat of a combined attack from the Latin empire of Constantinople and the Seljuks of Rum and over- came various local lords who, in the wake of the collapse of Byzantium, had established their own independent authorities in Asia Minor. His successors, John III Vatatzes (1221–1254) and Theodore II Laskaris (1254–1258), conquered large territories in the Balkans. They forced the rulers of Epiros to abandon their claim to the imperial title and reduced the military strength of the Latin empire of Constantinople. Under John III and Theodore II, Nicaea prevailed as the legitimate successor to the Byzantine empire. In 1261, the Nicaean army cap- tured Constantinople and Michael VIII Palaiologos (1259–1282), who had seized the throne from the Laskarids, restored the Byzantine empire. Yet, despite the conquests of the Laskarids and the recovery of Constantinople by Michael VIII, much territory which had belonged to the Byzantine empire before the Fourth Crusade remained beyond imperial control.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fourth Crusade Was No Different
    Coastal Carolina University CCU Digital Commons Honors College and Center for Interdisciplinary Honors Theses Studies Fall 12-15-2016 The ourF th Crusade: An Analysis of Sacred Duty ‌ Dale Robinson Coastal Carolina University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/honors-theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Robinson, Dale, "The ourF th Crusade: An Analysis of Sacred Duty "‌ (2016). Honors Theses. 4. https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/honors-theses/4 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College and Center for Interdisciplinary Studies at CCU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of CCU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Robinson 1 The crusades were a Christian enterprise. They were proclaimed in the name of God for the service of the church. Religion was the thread which bound crusaders together and united them in a single holy cause. When crusaders set out for a holy war they took a vow not to their feudal lord or king, but to God. The Fourth Crusade was no different. Proclaimed by Pope Innocent III in 1201, it was intended to recover Christian control of the Levant after the failure of past endeavors. Crusading vows were exchanged for indulgences absolving all sins on behalf of the church. Christianity tied crusaders to the cause. That thread gradually came unwound as Innocent’s crusade progressed, however. Pope Innocent III preached the Fourth Crusade as another attempt to secure Christian control of the Holy Land after the failures of previous crusades.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Book the Fourth Crusade: and the Sack of Constantinople
    THE FOURTH CRUSADE: AND THE SACK OF CONSTANTINOPLE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Professor Jonathan Phillips | 400 pages | 07 Jun 2005 | Vintage Publishing | 9781844130801 | English | London, United Kingdom The Fourth Crusade: And the Sack of Constantinople PDF Book After the city's sacking, most of the Byzantine Empire's territories were divided up among the Crusaders. Dandolo, who joined the crusade during a public ceremony in the church of San Marco di Venezia , proposed that the crusaders pay their debts by intimidating many of the local ports and towns down the Adriatic, culminating in an attack on the port of Zara in Dalmatia. Boniface of Montferrat , meanwhile, had left the fleet before it sailed from Venice, to visit his cousin Philip of Swabia. It is a fact that a crime was committed here in the city years ago. In order to cover their retreat the Westerners instigated the "Great Fire", which burnt from 19 to 21 August, destroying a large part of Constantinople and leaving an estimated , homeless. Byzantine aristocrats also established a number of small independent splinter states, one of them being the Empire of Nicaea , which would eventually recapture Constantinople in and proclaim the reinstatement of the Empire. Secular Sacred Cross-in-square Domes. As an adult, Rupert has written about numerous battles from the ancient world to the Crusades , military expeditions, beginning in the late 11th century, that were organized by western European Christians in response to centuries of Muslim wars of expansion. About ships, horse transports, and galleys delivered the crusading army across the narrow strait, where Alexios III had lined up the Byzantine army in battle formation along the shore, north of the suburb of Galata.
    [Show full text]
  • The Byzantino-Latin Principality of Adrianople and the Challenge of Feudalism (1204/6–Ca
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ghent University Academic Bibliography The Byzantino-Latin Principality of Adrianople and the Challenge of Feudalism (1204/6–ca. 1227/28) Empire, Venice, and Local Autonomy Filip Van Tricht n the aftermath of the conquest of Constantinople in designated or recognized by Venice as ruler of the city I1204 during the Fourth Crusade, one of many new of Adrianople, the author convincingly argues that political entities that took shape was a relatively short- the principality was no independent state, but a feu- lived principality centered on the city of Adrianople in dal principality within the framework of the (Latin) Thrace. Until recently not much attention had been Empire of Constantinople, a conclusion that for non- devoted to its history or position within the Byzantine Greek authors such as Jean Longnon had been rather space in the first decades of the thirteenth century.1 A self-evident.3 few years ago, however, Benjamin Hendrickx wrote an Along the way Hendrickx also makes some state- article with as starting point the observation that most ments that in my opinion raise new questions and war- Greek scholars until then had always maintained that rant further investigation. First, the author considers the principality in question was an independent state the mentioned Pactum to be an illustration of “Venice’s in the sense of a so-called Territorialstaat or toparchia independent policy in Romania” vis-à-vis the Latin as defined by Jürgen Hoffman.2 Through a renewed emperors.4 I will argue however that there are good rea- analysis of the so-called Pactum Adrianopolitanum sons to challenge this proposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Let's Sue Them All! the Byzantine Disaster. Grade 7 Lesson. Schools of California Online Resources
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 457 064 SO 031 525 AUTHOR Otto, Gina TITLE Let's Sue Them All! The Byzantine Disaster. Grade 7 Lesson. Schools of California Online Resources for Education (SCORE): Connecting California's Classrooms to the World. INSTITUTION San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools, CA. PUB DATE 1998-00-00 NOTE 38p. AVAILABLE FROM Schools of California Online Resources for Education, San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools, 601 North East Street, San Bernardino, CA 92410-3093. E-mail: [email protected]; Web site: http://score.rims.k12.ca.us. For full text: http://score.rims.k12.ca.us/activity/academy/index.htm. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Learner (051) Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Case Method (Teaching Technique); *Cultural Context; Curriculum Enrichment; *European History; Foreign Countries; Grade 7; Interdisciplinary Approach; Junior High Schools; *Middle Eastern History; Non Western Civilization; *Role Playing; Social Studies; Writing Assignments IDENTIFIERS *Ottoman Empire; *Roman Empire ABSTRACT Who is responsible for loss of life and property when one empire is conquered by another? It is the year 1473 A.D., 20 years after the fall of Constantinople. On May 29, 1453, the Eastern Roman Empire came to an end with the military takeover of Constantinople by the Ottoman Turks. How could an empire cease to exist? What were the people in and around the area doing in its final days? History does not occur in a vacuum. What occurs in one place effects others and can be partially caused by the actions or non-actions of neighbors.
    [Show full text]
  • Venice, Commerce, and the Fourth Crusade James B
    Historical Perspectives: Santa Clara University Undergraduate Journal of History, Series II Volume 10 Article 10 2005 A Calculated Crusade: Venice, Commerce, and the Fourth Crusade James B. Hooper Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.scu.edu/historical-perspectives Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Hooper, James B. (2005) "A Calculated Crusade: Venice, Commerce, and the Fourth Crusade," Historical Perspectives: Santa Clara University Undergraduate Journal of History, Series II: Vol. 10 , Article 10. Available at: http://scholarcommons.scu.edu/historical-perspectives/vol10/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Historical Perspectives: Santa Clara University Undergraduate Journal of History, Series II by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hooper: A Calculated Crusade A Calculated Crusade 87 88 Historical Perspectives March 2005 A Calculated Crusade: a number of territories—including Jerusalem—known as the Crusader States. After stabilizing the region as Venice, Commerce, and the Fourth Cru- much as possible, a practical problem emerged. Since sade all the Muslims had not been expelled from the Levant, the two sides would be forced to live in peace together. James B. Hooper While the war had been founded on cultural incompat- When Urban II preached the First Crusade to the ibility and religious opposition, neither side could Council of Clermont at the end of the 11th century, he justify genocide. When Christians had gained firm urged a pre-emptive strike against the Muslims whose control of the Holy Land and had established the military advances continually threatened the eastern Crusader States, they allowed Muslims and Jews to boundaries of the Byzantine Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleksandar Uzelac (Institute of History, Belgrade)
    62 GOLDEN HORDE REVIEW. № 3. 2015 УДК 327:94(495.02:477.75)"12":94(=512.145) LATIN EMPIRE OF CONSTANTINOPLE, THE JOCHIDS AND CRIMEA IN THE MID-THIRTEENTH CENTURY* Aleksandar Uzelac (Institute of History, Belgrade) The aim of this paper is the analysis of relations between the Latin Empire of Constantinople and Ulus of Jochi (the Golden Horde). It is primarily focused upon the diplomatic mission of Baldwin of Hainaut, which took place approxi- mately between 1249 and 1252. As a representative of the namesake Latin Em- peror, Baldwin of Hainaut led negotiations with the Batu’s son Sartak, and then, he traveled to the Far East, where he possibly met with the Great Khan Möngke. The aim of the mission was to secure the Mongol support for the defense of Con- stantinople against aggressive aspirations of the Empire of Nicaea. The immedi- ate results of the Baldwin’s mission are not known, but it is certain that they led to the establishment of the diplomatic relations between the Latin Empire and the Jochids. It is confirmed by the fact that the famous Flemish traveler William of Rubruck carried recommendations of the Latin emperor to a Tatar representative who governed the lands to the north of Crimea. Exactly these recommendations provided Rubruck safe passage through the Tatar territory. Important factor that led to the Baldwin’s enterprise were activities of Vene- tian and other Italian merchants. They served as primary intermediaries between the Frankish establishment of Constantinople and the Tatars, but they were not the only ones who played this role.
    [Show full text]
  • Propaganda and Denominations of the Byzantine Successor States and the Crusader States (1204-1261) an Essay on the Political History of the Empire in Exile
    Propaganda and Denominations of the Byzantine Successor States and the Crusader States (1204-1261) An Essay on the Political History of the Empire in Exile Michiya NISHIMURA Introduction In 1204, the fourth crusaders finally captured Constantinople, the capital of the Byzantine Empire. Between 1204 and 1261, the empire was compelled to be in exile. Territory of the former empire was divided into the Crusader states and the Byzantine successor states. During this period, these states were allied and conflicted with each other in several ways.1 Concerning their monetary policy, most states were minting previous Byzantine denominations. These denominations were the gold nomisma hyperpyron, the electrum aspron trachy, the billon aspron trachy, the tetarteron and the half-tetarteron (both copper). These were introduced in the fiscal year of 1092/93 by the emperor Alexius I Comnenus (1081-1118). Prior to 1204, the monetary system with these denominations had been effectively well-balanced.2 Even in the present days, the monetary circulation of this period remains a complicated issue. As there are many written and archeological sources, contradictions between them make it difficult to explain this issue. From different researches, many scholars assume that various denominations (those of the Byzantine successor states, the Crusader states, the former 1 G. Ostrogorsky, History of the Byzantine State, trans. J. Hussey, New Brunswick, 1969, pp.418-450. 2 M. F. Hendy, Coinage and Money in the Byzantine Empire, 1081-1261, Washington D.C., 1969. Idem, Catalogue of the Byzantine Coins in the Dumbarton Oaks Collection and the Whittemore Collection: Vol.4, Alexius I to Michael VIII, 1081-1261, Washington D.C., 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fourth Crusade the Crazy
    Name _________________________________________________________ Date ______________ Period _______ Class __________ The Fourth Crusade: The Crazy One by John Green (adapted) After the Third Crusade (the famous one with Richard and Saladin), crusading continued all the way into the 14th century, mostly with an emphasis on North Africa and not the Holy Land, but the Fourth Crusade is the last one worth focusing on, because it was the crazy one. So a lot of people volunteered for the Fourth Crusade — more than 35,000 — and the generals didn’t want to march them all the way across Anatolia (aka Asia Minor), because they knew from experience in the previous three Crusades that it was (A) dangerous and (B) hot, so they decided to go by boat, which required the building of the largest naval fleet Europe had seen since the Roman Empire. The Venetians (inhabitants of the Italian port city of Venice) built 500 ships, but then only 11,000 Crusaders actually made it down to Venice, because, like, oh I meant to go but I had a thing come up… etc. There wasn’t enough money to pay for those boats, so the Venetians made the Crusaders a deal: Help us capture the rebellious city of Zara, and we’ll ferry you to Anatolia. This was a smidge problematic, Crusading- wise, because Zara was a Christian city, but the Crusaders agreed to help, resulting in the Pope excommunicating both them and the Venetians. After the Crusaders failed to take back Zara for the Venetians, they were still broke, with no way of getting to the Holy Land to do their crusading, until a would-be Byzantine emperor named Alexius III promised the Crusaders he would pay them if they helped him become the new emperor, so the (excommunicated) Catholic Crusaders fought on behalf of the Greek Orthodox Alexius, who soon became emperor in Constantinople.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    The Sundered Eagle Contents The Middle Classes ........................ 37 I. Introduction 6 III. The Order of Hermes 20 The Lower Classes .......................... 37 BYZANTINE LANDSCAPE ....................... 6 HERMETIC HISTORY .......................... 20 Slavery ............................................ 37 BYZANTINE REALMS ............................ 6 Before the Order of Hermes ........... 20 Eunuchs .......................................... 37 BYZANTINE PEOPLES ........................... 6 Shaping the Theban Tribunal ......... 20 Women ........................................... 38 BYZANTINE LEGENDS .......................... 6 The Collapse of an Empire .................22 THE EASTERN CHURCH ..................... 38 HOW TO USE THIS BOOK ................... 7 THE LEAGUES OF THEBES .................. 22 The Two Patriarchs The League of Constantine ............ 22 of Constantinople ........................... 38 The Children of Olympos .............. 23 Buildings ......................................... 39 II. History of the Empire 8 The League of the Vigilant ............. 24 Clergy ............................................. 39 League Against Idolatry .................. 24 The Origin of Mankind .................... 8 Monastics ....................................... 40 The Age of Heroes ........................... 8 THEBAN TRIBUNAL POLITICS .............. 24 Icons ............................................... 40 The Trojan War .................................8 THE HERMETIC POLITY ..................... 24 INHABITANTS...................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Contemporary Documents Concerning the Fourth Crusade And
    1 Contemporary Documents concerning the Fourth Crusade and the Latin Empire of Constantinople (a) Innocent III to the Illustrious Emperor of Constantinople (Lateran Palace, 16th November 1202). This letter, written a week before the fall of Zara, is a key piece of evidence for the diversion of the Fourth Crusade, as well as important testimony to the pope’s view of the disputed imperial succession in Germany. ‘We have received your letter and envoys with the courtesy which befits your imperial authority, and we have diligently examined those matters which these same envoys wished to put before us, as well as what was contained in the letters themselves. Your envoys indeed suggested (and these ideas are detailed in your letters) that since the Christian army which was coming to the aid of the Holy Land preferred to invade your highness’s territory and take up arms against Christians, it was fitting to our office that we should recall them from such a purpose, lest by defiling their hands with the blood of Christians they should by this incur the displeasure of God, and being weakened in no small measure would be to some extent anyway unable to attack the enemies of Christ. Moreover, on your excellency’s behalf they added that we should show no favour at all to Alexius, son of Isaac Angelos the former emperor, who approached Philip, Duke of Swabia, in order to obtain with his help the empire in your place. This was because there is no reason for the empire to be given to him [Alexius], since the empire is conferred by election, not by succession, unless by chance he had been born after his father had acceded to the exalted rank of imperial authority.
    [Show full text]