Aryan Race Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
10/4/2015 Aryan race Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Aryan race From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article is about the racial theory. For the full range of meanings of "Aryan", see Aryan. For other uses, see Aryan (disambiguation). "Aryanism" redirects here. For the Christian theology, see Arianism. The Aryan race was a racial grouping commonly used in the period of the late 19th century to the mid 20th century to describe peoples of European and Western Asian heritage. It derives from the idea that the original speakers of the IndoEuropean languages and their descendants up to the present day constitute a distinctive race or subrace of the larger Caucasian race.[1] While originally meant simply as a neutral ethnolinguistic classification, from the late 19th century onwards the concept of the Aryan race has been used as a form of Scientific racism, a pseudoscience used by proponents of ideologicallymotivated racism and supremacism such as in doctrines of Nazism and neo Nazism. Aryanism developed as a racial ideology that claimed that the Aryan race was a master race. Contents 1 Origin of the term 2 19thcentury physical anthropology 3 Occultism 3.1 Theosophy 3.2 Ariosophy 4 Aryanism 4.1 Nazism 4.2 Italian Fascism 4.3 NeoNazism 4.3.1 Tempelhofgesellschaft 5 See also 5.1 Philosophical 5.2 Third Reich specific 5.3 Contemporaneous concepts of race 6 References 7 Sources 8 Further reading 9 External links Origin of the term Main article: Aryan The term Aryan originates from the Sanskrit word ārya, in origin an ethnic selfdesignation, in Classical Sanskrit meaning "honourable, respectable, noble".[3][4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan_race 1/17 10/4/2015 Aryan race Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In the 18th century, the most ancient known IndoEuropean languages were those of the ancient Indo Iranians. The word Aryan was therefore adopted to refer not only to the IndoIranian peoples, but also to native IndoEuropean speakers as a whole, including the Romans, Greeks, and the Germans. It was soon recognised that Balts, Celts, and Slavs also belonged to the same group. It was argued that all of these languages originated from a common root—now known as ProtoIndoEuropean—spoken by an ancient people who were thought of as ancestors of the European, Iranian, and IndoAryan peoples. The ethnic group composed of the ProtoIndoEuropeans and their modern descendants was termed the "Aryans". This usage was common among knowledgeable authors writing in the late 19th and early 20th century. An example of this usage appears in The Outline of History, a bestselling 1920 work by H. G. The earliest epigraphicallyattested Wells.[5] In that influential volume, Wells used the term in the plural reference to the word arya occurs in ("the Aryan peoples"), but he was a staunch opponent of the racist the 6thcentury B.C. Behistun and politically motivated exploitation of the singular term ("the inscription, which describes itself to Aryan people") by earlier authors like Houston Stewart Chamberlain have been composed "in arya (see below) and was careful either to avoid the generic singular, [language or script]" (§ 70). As is though he did refer now and again in the singular to some specific also the case for all other Old Iranian "Aryan people" (e.g., the Scythians). In 1922, in A Short History of language usage, the arya of the the World, Wells depicted a highly diverse group of various "Aryan inscription does not signify anything [2] peoples" learning "methods of civilization" and then, by means of but "Iranian". different uncoordinated movements that Wells believed were part of a larger dialectical rhythm of conflict between settled civilizations and nomadic invaders that also encompassed Aegean and Mongol peoples inter alia, "subjugat[ing]"—"in form" but not in "ideas and methods"—"the whole ancient world, Semitic, Aegean and Egyptian alike".[6] However, in a climate of burgeoning racism it proved difficult to maintain such nuanced distinctions. Even Max Mueller, a linguist who The region Aria as depicted by wrote in 1888 that "an ethnologist who speaks of Aryan race, Aryan Waldseemuller in 1507 blood, Aryan eyes and hair, is as great a sinner as a linguist who speaks of a dolichocephalic dictionary or a brachycephalic grammar,"[7] was on occasion guilty of using the term "Aryan race."[8] So it was that despite the injunctions of writers like Wells, the notion of an Aryan race took root in mainstream culture. Thus, in the 1944 edition of Rand McNally's World Atlas, the Aryan race is depicted as one of the ten major racial groupings of mankind.[9] The science fiction author Poul Anderson (1926–2001), an antiracist libertarian of Scandinavian ancestry, in his many novels, novellas, and short stories, consistently used the term Aryan as a synonym for IndoEuropeans.[10] Today the use of "Aryan" as a synonym for "IndoEuropean" or to a lesser extent for "IndoIranian" both in academia and in popular culture is obsolete, ideologically suspect, and politically incorrect. But the term may still occasionally appear in material that is based on older scholarship or written by persons https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan_race 2/17 10/4/2015 Aryan race Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia accustomed to older usage. Thus in a 1989 article in Scientific American, Colin Renfrew uses the term "Aryan" as a synonym for "IndoEuropean".[11] The term IndoAryan is still commonly used to describe the Indic half of the IndoIranian languages, i.e., the family that includes Sanskrit and modern languages such as Hindi, Urdu and Bengali. 19thcentury physical anthropology Main article: Caucasian race See also: Scientific racism In 19th century physical anthropology, represented by some as being scientific racism, the "Aryan race" was defined as the subgroup of the Caucasian (or Europid) race consisting of the native speakers of Indo European languages descended from the original ProtoIndo Europeans, that in modern times reside in Europe, Australia, New Zealand, AngloAmerica, Canada, Russia, South Africa, Latin America, Iran, Armenia, Maldives, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Northern India, and Nepal.[12] The original 19thcentury and early 20thcentury use of the The 4th edition of Meyers Konversationslexikon (Leipzig, 1885–1890) shows term Aryan referred to "the early the Caucasian race (in various shades of grayish bluegreen) as comprising speakers of ProtoIndo Aryans, Semites, and Hamites. Aryans are further subdivided into European European and their Aryans and IndoAryans (the term "IndoAryans" was then used to describe descendents".[13][14] Max Müller those now called IndoIranians). is often identified as the first writer to speak of an Aryan "race" in English. In his Lectures on the Science of Language in 1861[15] he referred to Aryans as a "race of people". At the time, the term race had the meaning of "a group of tribes or peoples, an ethnic group".[16] When Müller's statement was interpreted to imply a biologically distinct subgroup of humanity, he soon clarified that he simply meant a line of descent, insisting that it was very dangerous to mix linguistics and anthropology. "The Science of Language and the Science of Man cannot be kept too much asunder ... I must repeat what I have said many times before, it would be wrong to speak of Aryan blood as of dolichocephalic grammar".[17] He restated his opposition to this method in 1888 in his essay Biographies of words and the home of the Aryas.[15] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan_race 3/17 10/4/2015 Aryan race Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Müller was responding to the development of racial anthropology, and the influence of the work of Arthur de Gobineau who argued that the IndoEuropeans represented a superior branch of humanity. A number of later writers, such as the French anthropologist Vacher de Lapouge in his book L'Aryen, argued that this superior branch could be identified biologically by using the cephalic index (a measure of head shape) and other indicators. He argued that the longheaded "dolichocephalicblond" Europeans, characteristically found in northern Europe, were natural leaders, destined to rule over more "brachiocephalic" (short headed) peoples.[18] The division of the Caucasian race into Aryans, Semites and Hamites is in origin linguistic, not based on physical anthropology, the division in physical anthropology being that into Nordic, Alpine and Mediterranean. However, the linguistic classification of "Aryan" later became closely associated, and conflated, with the Arthur de Gobineau, one of the key classification of "Nordic" among some archaeologists and formulators of the theory of the anthropologists. "Aryan race" This claim became increasingly important during the 19th century. In the mid19th century, it was commonly believed that the Aryans originated in the southwestern steppes of presentday Russia. However, by the late 19th century the steppe theory of Aryan origins was challenged by the view that the Aryans originated in ancient Germany or Scandinavia, or at least that in those countries the original Aryan ethnicity had been preserved. The German origin of the Aryans was especially promoted by the archaeologist Gustaf Kossinna, who claimed that the ProtoIndoEuropean peoples were identical to the Corded Ware culture of Neolithic Germany. This idea was widely circulated in both intellectual and popular culture by the early twentieth century,[19] and is reflected in the concept of "CordedNordics" in Carleton S. Coon's 1939 The Races of Europe. Other anthropologists contested such claims. In Germany, Rudolf Virchow launched a study of craniometry, which prompted him to denounce "Nordic mysticism" in the 1885 Anthropology Congress in Karlsruhe, while Josef Kollmann, a collaborator of Virchow, stated in the same congress that the people of Europe, be they English, German, French, and Spaniard belonged to a "mixture of various races," furthermore declaring that the "results of craniology...[are] against any theory concerning the superiority of this or that European race" to others.[15] Virchow's contribution to the debate sparked a controversy.