On Francesco Guicciardini's Thought

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

On Francesco Guicciardini's Thought 2021-4142-AJHIS-HIS – 08 MAR 2021 1 On Francesco Guicciardini’s Thought 2 3 Francesco Guicciardini (1483-1540), Italian historian, politician and writer, - 4 descendant of one of the most important and faithful families to the Medici family in 5 Florence - received a solid humanistic education and was also the protagonist of the 6 Italian politics in the XVIth century; during the wars between France and Spain for 7 the domination of the peninsula, he became the objective interpreter of these events 8 in terms of historiography. Upright and austere character, he is the author of one of 9 the best histories of Italy, written in the spirit of the time, whose prime quality is the 10 historical veracity. Guicciardini fed the feeling of nationality and the aspiration to 11 independence of Italy. In his works he shows the painful efforts of the princes and 12 heads of republics, dragged in continuous wars, trying to defend, to confederate, to 13 seek help in various foreign powers in order to save themselves from the oppression 14 of the rulers. His genius, intuitive and painfully prophetic, discerns the events from 15 the things; he pronounces safe judgments and recommends possible remedies to save 16 the nation. 17 18 Keywords: Francesco Guicciardini, Sixteenth Century, Italian States 19 20 21 Francesco Guicciardini (1483-1540), Italian historian, politician and writer, 22 - descendant of one of the most important and faithful families to the Medici 23 family in Florence - received a solid humanistic education and was also the 24 protagonist of the Italian politics in the XVIth century; during the wars 25 between France and Spain for the domination of the peninsula, he became the 26 objective interpreter of these events in terms of historiography. 27 Upright and austere character, he is the author of one of the best histories 28 of Italy - Storia d’Italia - The History of Italy - written in the spirit of the time, 29 whose prime quality is the historical veracity. We must add his considerable 30 diplomatic skills. Cavour put him ahead of Machiavelli: politician, performing 31 many high dignities, Guicciardini is an imposing figure. 32 The marriage with Maria Salviati, in 1508, strengthened the political 33 influence and it granted him the political ascension. After the war against Pisa, 34 in 1509, he ascended very quickly in the international politics and in 1512 he 35 was appointed by the Florentine Republic as ambassador to Spain at 36 Ferdinand the Catholic. In 1512 he stopped writing his first work, Storie 37 fiorentine - The Florentine Histories, to assume the diplomatic assignment that 38 we mentioned before, the embassy to the court of Spain, where he remained 39 until 1514. The result of this experience in his diplomatic activity will be the 40 political work Il Discorso di Logrogno - The Discourse from Logrogno (1512), a 41 proposal for a political organization of the Florentine state, within which 42 Guicciardini sustains the reform in the aristocratic sense of the Florentine 43 Republic. 1 2021-4142-AJHIS-HIS – 07 MAR 2021 1 After the moment when Giulio de’ Medici became Pope Clement VII, 2 Guicciardini is sent to govern the Romagna, a region very agitated by the 3 struggles between the richest families. To counterpoint the power of Charles 4 V, he proposed an alliance between the regional states of Italy and France, in 5 order to safeguard the independence of the peninsula. The agreement was 6 signed in Cognac in 1526, but was never put into practice. After the predation 7 of Rome – il sacco di Roma - (1527), he was removed from the diplomatic 8 assignments that he had been given. 9 In 1529 he left Florence and returned to Rome with the intention to enter 10 the service of Pope Clement VII, and was offered the position of a diplomat to 11 Bologna. After the fall of the Republic of Florence and restoration of the power 12 of the Medici family, in 1531, Guicciardini returned to Florence, where he held 13 various duties on behalf of the Medici family and Pope Clement VII, but after 14 1534, the new Pope Paul III didn’t give him any big assignments. 15 After the return of the Medici family in Florence, he remained in their 16 residence as counsellor of Duke Alessandro. In the latest years, he finished the 17 Ricordi politici e civili („The Political and Civil Memories”), he collected his 18 Discorsi politici („Political Discourses”) and wrote the Storia d’Italia (History of 19 Italy-1537-1540). None of Guicciardini’s works was published during his 20 lifetime. 21 „The History of Italy”- Storia d’Italia begins with the history of Italy from 22 1490, which is the year of the death of Lorenzo the Magnificent and ends in 23 1534, the year of the descent into Italy of Charles VIII of France (after the 24 predation of Rome by the Lanzichenecchi and the death of Pope Clement VII). 25 Written by a „senior official and advisor to three popes”, with ambitions of 26 classicism – he was inspired by the “Commentaries” of Caesar -, but with a 27 great modernity1. 28 Objective and impartial critic of his times, in his Storia d’Italia (History of 29 Italy) - vast and detailed image of what happened in Italy between the last 30 decade of the Quattrocento and 1534 - he achieved excellent results as an 31 analyst and political thinker. In Guicciardini there is a political realism that 32 follows the idea of a unified Italian state by taking as examples the great 33 national monarchies of Europe, but not taking into account the fact that those 34 had been created through the strength of an enterprising and opened 35 bourgeoisie, while in Italy a petty bourgeoisie survived, unable to look 36 beyond the narrow limits of the municipality or region. 37 In Discorsi politici - Political Discourses Guicciardini imitates the ancient 38 historians, and makes them the main characters of the time. Their councils are 39 intent to make Guicciardini’s contemporaries to seek the salvation of the states 40 which were at that time involved in the ambitions of the foreign rulers, eager 41 to divide Italy. The Discourses have a general character because they highlight 1V. De Caprariis, Francesco Guicciardini. Dalla politica alla storia, Bari, 1950, p. 28 2 2021-4142-AJHIS-HIS – 07 MAR 2021 1 the conditions of the states of Europe and their relationships with those of the 2 peninsula. It’s part of a series of Discourses that Guicciardini wrote in 1511, 3 after being appointed ambassador of the Republic of Florence through the 4 Crown of Aragon, ruled at the time by Ferdinand the Catholic. This 5 experience made him understand, in a more detached and professional way, 6 the high-level politics of Florence, which he analyzed in his work. 7 Il Discorso di Logrogno („The Discourse of Logrogno”) is a juvenile political 8 work written in 1512 in which Gucciardini sustains a reform - in the 9 aristocratic sense - of the Florentine Republic, proposing a system similar to 10 that of Venice. The discourse takes its name from the city where it was 11 written, the current Logroño. In “The Discourse from Logrogno” he begins from 12 the analysis of the various political events in Italy, still divided into regional 13 states, to arrive at the influence on the peninsula made by the monarchical 14 states of Europe of that time. 15 During the same period, Guicciardini also wrote the Relazioni di Spagna 16 („The Relationships of Spain”) and Il Diario di Spagna („The Diary of Spain”), 17 and started the first draft of the Ricordi („Memories”). His political thinking is 18 exposed in Ricordi - “Memories”2 and he is the author of a skeptical and 19 disenchanted vision on politics and on the human ability to manipulate 20 reality. „The Memories” relates to various periods of Guicciardini’s activity as 21 diplomat and politician, taking its resources from this long and complex 22 experience. Hence the character of the work (the title really means “things to 23 remember” and then, by extension, “thoughts”, “reflections”), that faces, with 24 a bitter and disillusioned pessimism, more general problems. These reflections 25 can provide a useful teaching but they don’t have, however, absolute validity, 26 because reality does not obey to universal laws, maintaining a changing and 27 unpredictable course. 28 Between 1516 and 1527 Guicciardini works for the papal curia, in the 29 service of the Medici popes: Leo X, afterwards Clement VII. In this period, he 30 writes Dialogo del reggimento di Firenze („The Dialogue of the Regiment of 31 Florence”) - 1521-1526, in two books. This is his only political-theoretical 32 treaty. The work is a dialogical treaty, under the form of two days of 33 discussion, a few weeks after the expulsion of Piero de’ Medici from Florence, 34 among people of different political views: Bernardo del Nero, a partisan of the 35 Medici, Piero Capponi, aristocratic, Paolantonio Soderini, a partisan of the 36 people, Piero Guicciardini, father of the writer, moderator. It is a general 37 reflection on the state and on human nature. The author imagines a discussion 38 held in Florence in 1494, after the death of Lorenzo the Magnificent. The 39 interlocutors are the writer’s father, Piero, Paolantonio Soderini and Piero 40 Capponi, all Republicans, to whom Bernardo del Nero - who was linked to the 2Marin Vătafu, С. Antoniade, Trei Figuri Din Cinquecento, in “Gând românesc”, Cluj, anul IV, nr.3-4/1936, p. 236 3 2021-4142-AJHIS-HIS – 07 MAR 2021 1 Medici party - opposes.
Recommended publications
  • Fra Sabba Da Castiglione: the Self-Fashioning of a Renaissance Knight Hospitaller”
    “Fra Sabba da Castiglione: The Self-Fashioning of a Renaissance Knight Hospitaller” by Ranieri Moore Cavaceppi B.A., University of Pennsylvania 1988 M.A., University of North Carolina 1996 Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Italian Studies at Brown University May 2011 © Copyright 2011 by Ranieri Moore Cavaceppi This dissertation by Ranieri Moore Cavaceppi is accepted in its present form by the Department of Italian Studies as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date Ronald L. Martinez, Advisor Recommended to the Graduate Council Date Evelyn Lincoln, Reader Date Ennio Rao, Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date Peter M. Weber, Dean of the Graduate School iii CURRICULUM VITAE Ranieri Moore Cavaceppi was born in Rome, Italy on October 11, 1965, and moved to Washington, DC at the age of ten. A Fulbright Fellow and a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania, Ranieri received an M.A. in Italian literature from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1996, whereupon he began his doctoral studies at Brown University with an emphasis on medieval and Renaissance Italian literature. Returning home to Washington in the fall of 2000, Ranieri became the father of three children, commenced his dissertation research on Knights Hospitaller, and was appointed the primary full-time instructor at American University, acting as language coordinator for the Italian program. iv PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I deeply appreciate the generous help that I received from each member of my dissertation committee: my advisor Ronald Martinez took a keen interest in this project since its inception in 2004 and suggested many of its leading insights; my readers Evelyn Lincoln and Ennio Rao contributed numerous observations and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Political Philosophy of Niccolò Machiavelli Filippo Del Lucchese Table of Contents Preface Part I
    The Political Philosophy of Niccolò Machiavelli Filippo Del Lucchese Table of Contents Preface Part I: The Red Dawn of Modernity 1: The Storm Part II: A Political Philosophy 2: The philosopher 3: The Discourses on Livy 4: The Prince 5: History as Politics 6: War as an art Part III: Legacy, Reception, and Influence 7: Authority, conflict, and the origin of the State (sixteenth-eighteenth centuries) 1 8: Nationalism and class conflict (nineteenth-twentieth centuries) Chronology Notes References Index 2 Preface Novel 84 of the Novellino, the most important collection of short stories before Boccaccio’s Decameron, narrates the encounter between the condottiere Ezzelino III da Romano and the Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II: It is recorded how one day being with the Emperor on horseback with all their followers, the two of them made a challenge which had the finer sword. The Emperor drew his sword from its sheath, and it was magnificently ornamented with gold and precious stones. Then said Messer Azzolino: it is very fine, but mine is finer by far. And he drew it forth. Then six hundred knights who were with him all drew forth theirs. When the Emperor saw the swords, he said that Azzolino’s was the finer.1 In the harsh conflict opposing the Guelphs and Ghibellines – a conflict of utter importance for the late medieval and early modern history of Italy and Europe – the feudal lord Ezzelino sends the Emperor a clear message: honours, reputation, nobility, beauty, ultimately rest on force. Gold is not important, good soldiers are, because good soldiers will find gold, not the contrary.
    [Show full text]
  • Leonardo Bruni, the Medici, and the Florentine Histories1
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Queensland eSpace /HRQDUGR%UXQLWKH0HGLFLDQGWKH)ORUHQWLQH+LVWRULHV *DU\,DQ]LWL Journal of the History of Ideas, Volume 69, Number 1, January 2008, pp. 1-22 (Article) 3XEOLVKHGE\8QLYHUVLW\RI3HQQV\OYDQLD3UHVV DOI: 10.1353/jhi.2008.0009 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/jhi/summary/v069/69.1ianziti.html Access provided by University of Queensland (30 Oct 2015 04:56 GMT) Leonardo Bruni, the Medici, and the Florentine Histories1 Gary Ianziti Leonardo Bruni’s relationship to the Medici regime raises some intriguing questions. Born in 1370, Bruni was Chancellor of Florence in 1434, when Cosimo de’ Medici and his adherents returned from exile, banished their opponents, and seized control of government.2 Bruni never made known his personal feelings about this sudden regime change. His memoirs and private correspondence are curiously silent on the issue.3 Yet it must have been a painful time for him. Among those banished by the Medici were many of his long-time friends and supporters: men like Palla di Nofri Strozzi, or Rinaldo degli Albizzi. Others, like the prominent humanist and anti-Medicean agita- tor Francesco Filelfo, would soon join the first wave of exiles.4 1 This study was completed in late 2006/early 2007, prior to the appearance of volume three of the Hankins edition and translation of Bruni’s History of the Florentine People (see footnote 19). References to books nine to twelve of the History are consequently based on the Santini edition, cited in footnote 52.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Friends Discourses of Power and Desire in the Machiavelli
    JOHN M. NAJEMY Between Friends Discourses of Power and Desire in the Machiavelli-Vettori Letters of 1513-1515 PRINCETON LEGACY LIBRARY c."Between friends DISCOURSES OF POWER AND DESIRE IN THE MACHIAVELLI-VETTORI LETTERS OF 1513-1515 John M. Najemy PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS • PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY Copyright © 1993 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, Chichester, Wesr Sussex All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Najemy, John M., 1943- Between friends : discourses of power and desire in the Machiavelli-Vettori letters of 1513-1515 / John M. Najemy. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-691-03262-9 z. Machiavelli, Niccolo, 1469-1527-Correspondence. 2. Vettori, Francesco, 1474-1539-Correspondence. 3. Italy-Intellectual life-1268-1559. DG738.14.M2A4 1993 320.1'092-dc20 93-9737 CIP This book has been composed in Garamond typeface Princeton University Press books are printed on acid-free paper and meet the guidelines fur permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources Printed in the United States of America IO 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Princeton Legacy Library edition 2019 Paperback ISBN: 978-0-691-65522-2 Hardcover ISBN: 978-0-691-65664-9 To the memory of Hans Baron (1900-1988) and Edward P. Morris (1924-1989) ?f CONTENTS ?f Prefac e ix Abbreviations xiii INTRODUCTION : The Letters in Machiavelli
    [Show full text]
  • Renaissance Quarterly Books Received: January–March 2011
    Renaissance Quarterly Books Received: January–March 2011 EDITIONS AND TRANSLATIONS: Alexander, Gavin R. Writing after Sidney: The Literary Response to Sir Philip Sidney 1586– 1640. Paperback edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. xliv + 380 pp. index. illus. bibl. $55. ISBN: 978–0–19–959112–1. Barbour, Richmond. The Third Voyage Journals: Writing and Performance in the London East India Company, 1607–10. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. 281 pp. index. append. illus. gloss. bibl. $75. ISBN: 978–0–230–61675–2. Buchanan, George. Poetic Paraphrase of The Psalms of David. Ed. Roger P. H. Green. Geneva: Librairie Droz S.A., 2011. 640 pp. index. append. bibl. $115. ISBN: 978–2–600–01445–8. Campbell, Gordon, and Thomas N. Corns, eds. John Milton: Life, Work, and Thought. Paperback edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. xv + 488 pp. index. illus. map. bibl. $24.95. ISBN: 978–0–19–959103–9. Calderini, Domizio. Commentary on Silius Italicus. Travaux d’Humanisme et Renaissance 477. Ed. Frances Muecke and John Dunston. Geneva: Librairie Droz S.A., 2010. 958 pp. index. tbls. bibl. $150. ISBN: 978–2–600–01434–2 (cl), 978–2–600–01434–2 (pbk). Campanella, Tommaso. Selected Philosophical Poems of Tommaso Campanella: A Bilingual Edition. Ed. Sherry L. Roush. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2011. xi + 248 pp. index. bibl. $45. ISBN: 978–0–226–09205–8. Castner, Catherine J., trans. Biondo Flavio’s Italia Illustrata: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Volume 2: Central and Southern Italy. Binghamton: Global Academic Publishing, 2009. xvi + 488 pp. index. illus. map. bibl. $36. ISBN: 978–1–58684–278–9.
    [Show full text]
  • The Present and the History of the Own Time: an Historical Approach
    The present and the history of the own time: an historical approach Gonzalo Pasamar Alzuria Universidad de Zaragoza The expression ‘History of the Present’ spans over a diversity of trends different in their political birth, main issues, and historical traditions from which they have derived It is however true that from the nineties onward, the ‘Zeitsgeschichte’, the ‘Contemporary History’, and the ‘Histoire du Temps Present’, quoting only the most noteworthy, have underwent changes, and even have approximated to one another. Born in the period of Cold War, supported by institutions and journals, the disappearance of the Soviet Union and the globalization has obliged them to revise their former approaches, and provided them with new opportunities for research. Nevertheless, these all have coincided in being pioneers in signalling the importance of the twentieth century and recent times by claiming the importance that witnesses, memories, and proximity to events have for historians. Even they have shown highly aware of being breaking with clichés coming from the first generations of professional historians, who ignored the recent times because of an assumed lack of perspective, or influenced by the dictum that ‘history must be about the past’. It is not coincidence that some authors had considered them, beyond designations, as a ‘new history’ (Aróstegui 2004, 19-61). To the members of the French Institute d’ Histoire du Temps Present, for instance, this trend should be regarded as a ‘démarche’, as a way of representing the present in motion; a recent time –the time of the contemporary historian- where events, processes, and memories converge (Tresbitsch 1993, 65).
    [Show full text]
  • MACHIAVELLI and GUICCIARDINI: ANCIENTS and MODERNS J. G. A. Pocock
    Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory/Revue canadienne de thiorie politique et sociale, Vol. 2, No. 3 (Fall/ Automne 1978). MACHIAVELLI AND GUICCIARDINI : ANCIENTS AND MODERNS J. G. A. Pocock This essay's aim' is to examine the contention, put forward by such diverse scholars as Friedrich Meinecke, Leo Strauss and Felix Gilbert, that Machiavelli's thought and that of other Florentines such as Bernardo Rucellai,.marked the start ofthinking about "modern" politics and history . It also attempts to consider the paired terms "ancient" and "modern" - what they may mean and have meant, and how far it has been or may be useful to examine the two Florentines in the context of the relation between antiquity and modernity. Leo Strauss held that we were living in times when modernity had itself become a problem. One might say that the word has always been used to denote a consciously problematical view of the human condition ; but doubtless it was some highly self-confident brand of progressivist or dialectical modernism that Strauss had chiefly in mind. At a much simpler level, we can agree that the concept of modernity always presents a rather obvious problem, that of definition. Must we always mean the same thing? It would not be hard to show that the word modern is what we make of it; its meaning depends largely upon what we choose to place before it. If we ask whether there is a sense in which Machiavelli and Guicciardini have been, or may be, said to mark the beginnings of modern political thinking, the elementary thought should soon occur to us that what preceded them ought to be termed not ancient but medieval.
    [Show full text]
  • After the Fall: Vettori, Machiavelli, and the Refiguring of Italia in Sixteenth-Century Political Discourse
    After the Fall: Vettori, Machiavelli, and the Refiguring of Italia in Sixteenth-Century Political Discourse Robert A. Policelli A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2006 Approved by Advisor: Melissa M. Bullard Reader: Lloyd S. Kramer Reader: Jay M. Smith © 2006 Robert A. Policelli ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Robert A. Policelli After the Fall: Vettori, Machiavelli, and the Refiguring of Italia in Sixteenth-Century Political Discourse (Under the Direction of Melissa M. Bullard) This thesis tracks changes in political thought in the writings of Niccolò Machiavelli and Francesco Vettori between 1512 and the 1520s. While modern historians have traditionally emphasized the early phase of their correspondence, I examine two often overlooked sources from later years: the letters they exchanged in the 1520s and Vettori’s history, the Sommario della Istoria d’Italia. By the 1520s, the Italian political terrain had experienced sweeping and devastating transformations. I seek to explore the effects of those changes on these Florentines’ thinking by highlighting an idea common to both of their writings—Italia. Through contrast with Vettori’s thought, I contextualize the nature of Machiavelli’s political observations after he had spent a decade and a half in political exile, while also shedding light on the dynamism of Italia in early sixteenth-century political discourse and historiography. In a short epilogue I suggest some ways in which a rethinking of early modern perceptions of Italia can also contribute to modern theoretical debates about the meaning of “nation.” iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the members of the Renaissance Workshop, in particular John Headley, for comments on an early draft of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Wittenberg History Journal Spring 2016
    Wittenberg History Journal Spring 2016 Unexpected Tensions: Social Conflict from the Viking Age to World War II Wittenberg History Journal Spring 2016 Unexpected Tensions: Social Conflict from the Viking Age to World War II Wittenberg History Journal Contents Spring 2016 | Volume XLV Hartje Award Winner 1 Half-Peace: The Successes and Failures of the Peace Process Unexpected Tensions: Social Conflict from the Viking Age to World War II in Northern Ireland Wittenberg University Springfield, Ohio Keri Heath 2016 Editorial Board I. Renaissance Reversed: Social Conflicts Senior Editors in Florence Keri Heath ‘16 Kaitlyn Vazquez ‘16 5 The Tensions Hidden Beneath Religious Festivities and Carnivals: A Social Analysis of Public Celebrations in Renaissance Florence Junior Editors Kristen Brady Kristen Brady ‘17 Vivian Overholt ‘17 Gil Rutledge ‘17 11 From the Bottom Up: Influence on the Upper Class by the Faculty Advisor Florentine Underground in the Renaissance Joshua Paddison Keri Heath Wittenberg History Journal is affiliated with the Gamma Zeta chapter of Phi Alpha Theta. 17 The Ospedale Degli Innocente: A Microhistory The Hartje Paper Hannah Hunt The Martha and Robert G. Hartje Award is presented annually to a senior in the spring semester. The History Department determines the three or four finalists who then write a 600 to 800 word narrative II. Forgotten Stories: Cartoonists and Kings essay on an historical event or figure. The finalists must have at least a 2.7 grade point average and 26 Kings at Sea: Examining a Forgotten Way of Life have completed at least six history courses. The winner is awarded $500 at a spring semester History Department colloquium and the winner paper is included in the History Journal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Real Thucydides Trap Lowell Gustafson Villanova University
    Elites and Imperial Ambitions: A Symposium The Real Thucydides Trap Lowell Gustafson Villanova University But he that desires to look into the truth of things done, and which (according to the condition of humanity) may be done again, or at least their like, he shall find enough herein to make him think it profitable. And it is compiled rather for an everlasting possession, than to be rehearsed for a prize. Thucydides, The Peloponnesian War, book I, chapter 22 (Hobbes’ translation.) The study of intellectual history is desirable for its own sake. Asking what ancient authors meant and how we should un- derstand them today is important, partly because we need to Study of an- consider how they might help us better deal with our pressing cient authors current problems. In this article, we consider a current prob- may help lem of politics and how an ancient author helps us approach with current problems. it. What does a book written 2,500 years ago have to offer us today? Is the condition of humanity indeed similar enough to think that what happened in an extraordinarily different time and condition could happen in some similar way? No doubt Thucydides would have been amazed by computers, airplanes, and all that distinguishes our age from his. But he may well have felt rather at home in many of the political relationships that characterize the human condition. Many since Thucydides’ time have found in his writing LOWEll GUSTAFSON is Professor of Political Science at Villanova University and a Senior Visiting Fellow at the Center for the Study of Statesmanship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historian Francesco Guicciardini Between Political Action and Historical Events*
    The Historian Francesco Guicciardini * between Political Action and Historical Events IGOR MELANI The ambassadors sent abroad are the eyes and ears of republics, and it is they who should be believed, not those who have a personal stake in affairs.1 1. The Statesman Portrayed When composing his Dialogo della mutatione di Firenze (Dialogue on the Revol- ution in Florence) around the year 1520, Bartolomeo Cerretani set the scene in Modena, where Giovanni di Bernardo Rucellai, Florentine ambassador to the King of France and a »Pallesco« (partisan of the Medicean faction), encountered two Florentine gentlemen who were »Frateschi« (partisans of the Savonarolan faction). After their unexpected meeting abroad, the three fellow citizens, at the suggestion of Giovanni Rucellai, decide to spend the evening together at the house of the Governor (»a casa il Governatore«), who at that time was Francesco Guicciardini (»el quale era ms. Francesco Guicciardini«). The host had been absent from Florence (as ambassador to the King of Ara- gon) during the period of regime change in 1512, when the so-called »popular Government«, led by the Gonfaloniere-for-life Francesco Soderini, was over- turned and the Medici family restored. The dialogue is prompted by his request for news on this delicate topic, but with an eight-year delay: on recent political history, Cerretani’s Guicciardini seems far from up-to-date. In accordance with Rucellai’s wishes, the structure of the Dialogo is conceiv- ed as a sort of debate between two voices, integrating that of the Pallesco Rucellai himself on one side (giving an account of the »fall of the popular government«), _____________ * Primary sources in this expanded version of the paper presented at the conference Humanis- tische Geschichten am Hof have been translated into English by Patrick Baker except where otherwise noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Machiavelli's Critique of Christianity
    MACHIAVELLI’S CRITIQUE OF CHRISTIANITY Paul-Erik Korvela The question of Machiavelli’s relation to religion in general and to Christianity in particular has aroused much discussion. There are scholars who claim that he was a sincere Christian in private life and constantly distressed by the fact that politics appears to operate by rules very different from the ones taught by Christ. Then there are those who claim that he was an atheist who aimed at devastating the whole of Christianity. In previous research, his opposition to Chris- tianity has been often assumed but seldom proved or clarified. This article aims to explore Machiavelli’s views on Christianity. Leaving aside the apparently insoluble question of his personal convictions,1 it will be argued that he nevertheless criticised Christianity for various reasons and thought that politics (or public ethics) is fundamentally incompatible with Christian ethics. His message was that politics (or arte dello stato) - when viewed from within the confines of a Christian Weltanschauung - is by nature always immoral. Hence, he does not separate politics and morality, but politics and Christian morality. As is commonly known, Machiavelli harked back to ancient Rome and its practices. The same methods were not used in his time, he thought, because Christianity had already carved men into its way of liking and made them effeminate and contemplative rather than virtuous and active. Machiavelli did not claim that it would be better for a society to eradicate religion altogether. Instead, he claimed that Christianity happens to be rather unsuited for a well-ordered state. Christianity contains some effective elements that were unavailable to paganism, and, when interpreted according to virtù, it, too, could 183 PAUL-ERIK KORVELA allow virtuous action in Machiavelli’s sense.
    [Show full text]