DOCSLIB.ORG

EU-Funded Rural Development Initiatives in Borjomi Municipality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EU-Funded Rural Development Initiatives in Borjomi Municipality ENPARD I – EU-funded Rural Development Initiatives in Borjomi Municipality N Borjomi Local Project Location EU Grant Implementer’s Co- Employment/Beneficiaries Development (GEL) financing (GEL) Strategy (LDS) Women Men Total priority areas 1. Tourism Provision of Rafting Village 56 520 GEL 37 680 GEL 12 employed 13 employed 25 employed service on the river Chitakhevi 11 youth 10 youth 21 youth 2000 Benef. 2. Tourism Synchronic Translation Town 36 420 GEL 24 280 GEL 2 Employed 2 Employed service provision Borjomi 1 youth 1 youth 1500 Benef. 3. Tourism Improvement of the ski Borough 18 000 GEL 12 000 GEL 1 Employed 4 employed 5 employed rental service for the Bakuriani 1 youth 2 youth 3 youth Tourists 1800 Benef. 4. Tourism Attraction service and Borough 75 000 GEL 75 000 GEL 9 Employed 9 Employed 18 Employed adventure tours for the Bakuriani 4 youth 2 youth 6 youth tourists 5000 Benef. 5. Tourism Souvenir development for Village Tba 6 420 GEL 4 280 GEL 1 Employed 4 Employed 5 Employed Borjomi municipality 1 youth 3 youth 4 youth 30 Benef. 50 Benef. 80 Benef. 6. Tourism Adventure service Borjomi- 19 200 GEL 12 800 GEL 1 Employed 4 Employed 5 Employed development for the Bakuriani 3 youth 3 youth tourists, organization of the 600 Benef. tours 7. Tourism Guest House establishment Village 26 688 GEL 26 688 GEL 4 Employed 2 Employed 6 Employed in the remote area Tabatskuri 2 youth 1 youth 3 youth Remote Area 350 Benef. 8. Tourism Borjomi Valley virtual Borjomi 63 000 GEL 42 000 GEL 2 3 5 Employed tours Employe d 2 Employed 1 youth 3 youth youth 150 Benef. 9. Tourism Arrangement of Tourist Village 18 000 GEL 12 000 GEL 3 2 Employed 5 Employed facility & Zanavi Employed 3 3 youth infrastructure for pedestrian youth 200 Benef. and cyclist tourists 10. Agriculture Bee-keeping Borough 50 000 GEL 17 000 GEL 2 Member 11 Member 13 Member development Tsagveri 1 youth 4 youth 5 youth 500 Benef. 11. Agriculture Young Fish incubator Village 60 000 GEL 40 000 GEL 2 Employed 4 6 Employed Tadzrisi 1 youth Employed 2 youth 3 youth 200 Benef. 12. Agriculture Berry Production Village Daba 18 000 GEL 6 000 GEL 9 6 15 Employed Employe d 1 Employed 2 youth 3 youth youth 1000 Benef. 13. Agriculture Combined food Village Likani 26 952 GEL 17 968 GEL 2 Employed 5 7 Employed production Employed 4 youth 4 youth 80 (farmers) Benef. 14. Sport & Culture Borjomi Cultural Town Borjomi 4 500 GEL 500 GEL Monuments & landscape 1 Owner photos for the tourists 1 Owner 0 youth 1500 Benef. 15. Sport & Culture Establishment of Sport Town Borjomi 75 000 GEL 75 000 GEL 40 Employed 56 Employed 96 Employed Playground 23 youth 22 employed 45 youth 3500 Benef. 16. Sport & Culture Development of local Village 3000 GEL 2000 GEL 3 Employed 2 Employed 5 Employed souvenirs by Tsikisjvari 2 youth 1 youth 3 youth 3D router Remote Area 500 Benef. 17. Sport & Culture Intellectual games Town Borjomi 14 292 GEL 1 588 GEL 3 2 Employed 5 Employed Employed 3 3 youth youth 300 Benef. 18. Sport & Culture Support Football club Town Borjomi 23 400 GEL 2 600 GEL 2 Employed 30 Employed 32 Employed “Borjomi2013” 30 Youth 30 youth 100 Benef, 19. Sport & Culture Musical Studio Borjomi town 10 499.85 GEL 3 499.95 GEL 2 owner 2 2 Employed Establishment youth 1000 Benef. 20. Environment Reforestation though new Village 7 050 GEL 2 350 GEL 1 owner 1 owner Plants “Kvabiskevi” 300 Benef. 21. Environment Establishment of tree Borough 50 000 GEL 5 000 GEL 1 owner 1 owner seedling plants for Tsagveri 1 youth 1 youth reforestation 3000 Benef. 22. Tourism Rehabilitation of “Eternal Town Borjomi90 660 GEL 40 Employed 56 Employed 96 Employed Flame (55% EU financing, 45% municipality 23 youth 22 employed 45 youth Square” co-financing) 5000 Benef 23. Sport & Culture Construction of Georgian Borough 97 684 GEL 6 Employed 6 Employed wrestling arena Akhladaba (55% EU financing, 45% municipality 4 youth co-financing) 120 Benef. 24. Sport & Culture Arrangement (construction) Village Tba70 057 GEL 1 Employed 1 Employed of small sport area (55% EU financing, 45% municipality 1000 Benef co-financing) 25. Sport & Culture Arrangement (construction) Village 74 980 GEL 1 Employed 1 Employed of small sport area Tsikhisjvari (55% EU financing, 45% municipality 300 Benef. co-financing) 26. Sport & Culture Rehabilitation of Puppet Town Borjomi127 000 GEL 14 4 18 Employed Theater building (55% EU financing, 45% municipality Employed 2 Employed l youth 3 youth co-financing) youth 5000 Benef. 27. Sport & culture Rehabilitation of Borjomi town96 708 GEL 32 Employed 1 Employed 33 Employed kindergarten (55% EU financing, 45% municipality 29 youth 29 youth co-financing) 150 Benef. 28. Sport & culture Rehabilitation of Borjomi town58 241 GEL 24 Employed 1 Employed 25 Employed kindergarten (55% EU financing, 45% municipality 20 youth 20 youth co-financing) 100 benef Contribution to the Social Economic Development of Borjomi Municipality Employment 440 Beneficiaries 35 330.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • As the Museum of Decorative-Applied Arts
    Terms of Reference Preparation of Museography for the “New Cavalry House” (Cavalry Corps) as the Museum of Decorative-Applied Arts Museum Exposition Concept, Interior Design and Management Plan 1: INTRODUCTION The Municipal Development Fund of Georgia (hereinafter the employer) is a legal entity of public law whose purpose is to mobilize financial resources from donors including international and Georgian financial institutions, in order to make them available for investments in local infrastructure and services, while simultaneously helping local self-governments in strengthening their institutional and financial capacity. The MDF programs envisage the implementation of various projects including the Third Regional Development Project financed by the World Bank and the Government of Georgia (GoG). The aim of the project is to promote tourism development in Mtskheta-Mtianeti and Samtskhe-Javakheti Regions. Site location and description The Decorative-Applied Arts Museum (“New Cavalry House”) is located in Borjomi Municipality, in the city of Borjomi. Borjomi is outstanding among the Georgian Spa resorts and owns the origin of the mineral water brand, “Borjomi”. Borjomi Gorge has great and significant resources and potentials for the development of cultural tourism. Besides the richness in culture and the presence of relevant monuments of cultural heritage, the natural landscape is of incomparable beauty. The extremely favourable location of Borjomi town and the numerous places of interest (among which area: Likani complex, Borjomi-Kharagauli National Park, alpine ski resort Bakuriani, Vardzia, Akhaltsikhe Rabati and Historical Museum of Samtskhe-Javakheti, Abastumani resort) make it an important tourist destination. Borjomi has a big advantage over other tourist destinations: it is located next to the National Borjomi-Kharagauli Park, the largest National Park in Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Realizing the Urban Potential in Georgia: National Urban Assessment
    REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA National Urban Assessment ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA NATIONAL URBAN ASSESSMENT ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2016 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2016. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-92-9257-352-2 (Print), 978-92-9257-353-9 (e-ISBN) Publication Stock No. RPT168254 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Asian Development Bank. Realizing the urban potential in Georgia—National urban assessment. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2016. 1. Urban development.2. Georgia.3. National urban assessment, strategy, and road maps. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. This publication was finalized in November 2015 and statistical data used was from the National Statistics Office of Georgia as available at the time on http://www.geostat.ge The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • Borjomi Local Development Strategy
    Borjomi Local Development Strategy 2016‐2019 June 1, 2016 BORJOMI LOCAL ACTION GROUP www.borjomilag.ge The development of this Local Development Strategy has been financially support by the European Union under the ENPARD project “A New Approach for Rural Development in Georgia” implemented by Mercy Corps. Technical support was provided by the Austrian Federal Institute for Less Favoured and Mountainous Areas (BABF), with additional input from the project partners, Angus Council in Scotland and Borjomi Municipality. 2 Contents 1. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 4 2. General Overview of Borjomi Municipality ..................................................................................... 5 3. Analysis of the Development Needs ............................................................................................... 6 3.1 Description of the region ......................................................................................................... 6 3.1.2 Socio‐economic situation ................................................................................................ 7 3.1.3 Education and qualification ............................................................................................. 8 3.1.4 Agriculture ....................................................................................................................... 8 3.1.5 Bio‐diversity ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Development Programme of Georgia 2018-2021 Table of Contents
    REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME OF GEORGIA 2018-2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………7 II. Foreword……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………17 II.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................17 II.2 Legal provisions......................................................................................................................................................................................................................17 II.3 Programming system ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................18 III.II.4 SituationThe institutional and trends framework with regard of regional to territorial policy................................ cohesion and ................................competitiveness................................…………………………………………………….........................................................2119 II.5 Donor support..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................20 III.1 General context .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    SFG2732 Public Disclosure Authorized THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT OF THE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM DEVELOPMENT STARTEGIES OF SAMTSKHE-JAVAKHETI AND MTSKETA-MTIANETI Public Disclosure Authorized Third Regional Development Project Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized December, 2016 Abbreviations GNTA Georgia National Tourism Administration EIA Environnemental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan RDS Regional Development Strategy RTDS Regional Tourism Development Strategy MDF Municipal Development Fund of Georgia MoA Ministry of Agriculture MoENRP Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia MoCMP Ministry of Culture and Monument Protection MESD Ministry of Economic and Sustaineble Developmnet NACHP National Agency for Cultural Heritage Protection PIU Project Implementation Unit RDP Regional Development Project SECHSA Strategic Environmental, Cultural Heritage and Social Assessment WB World Bank Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 THIRD REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (RDP III) ..................................................... 12 1.2 REGIONAL AND SECTORAL CONTEXT: RDS AND RTDS FOR SAMTSKHE- JAVAKHETI AND MTSKHETA-MTIANETI REGIONS ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Agency: Social Service Agency, LEPL
    Chapter V Affordable, Quality Healthcare and Social Security 1.1. Social Security of Population (Program Code: 35 02) Implementing Agency: Social Service Agency, LEPL 1.1.1. Pension Payments to Population (Program Code: 35 02 01) • Beneficiaries of state pensions and state compensations envisaged in Laws of Georgia on State pension, State Commensations and State Academic Bursaries have been paid pensions through financing the commitments made by the State on pension payments; • State pensions have been paid in January to over 708.1 thousand individuals, in February – to over 708.6 thousand individuals, in March – to over 709.4 thousand individuals, in April – to over 710.6 thousand individuals, in May – to over 711.5 thousand individuals, in June – to over 713.0 thousand individuals, in July – to over 714,2 thousand individuals, in August – to over 716.3 thousand individuals, in September – to over 717.8 thousand individuals, while state compensations have been paid in January-February to over 20.7-20.7 thousand beneficiaries, in March – to over 20.8 thousand beneficiaries, in April-May – to over 20.9-20.9 thousand beneficiaries, in June – to over 20.8 thousand beneficiaries and July-September - to over 20.9-20.9 thousand beneficiaries. Total expenditure towards this end in the reporting period has been 1 153.1 MLN GEL. 1.1.2. Social Security of Targeted Groups of Population (Program Code: 35 02 02) • Number of beneficiaries getting subsistance minimum in January has amounted over 407.3 thousand individuals, February – over 422.0 thousand
    [Show full text]
  • National Assessment of Georgian Municipalities (2019)
    RESULTS FOR 2019 1 61% Batumi 60 9% Samtredia 2 57% Rustavi 61 8% Adigeni 3 56% Lagodekhi 62 7% Aspindza NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF 4 55% Zugdidi 63 7% Ninotsminda GEORGIAN MUNICIPALITIES 5 52% Tetritskaro 64 6% Akhalkalaki (2019) 4 60 3 1 61 5 2 62 64 63 28% % 21% 31% % 24% 19% 25% 2017 2019 2017 2019 AVERAGE SCORE 2017 2019 MUNICIPAL COUNCIL CITY HALL Municipalities with Biggest Improvements Compared to 2017 www.lsgindex.org +34% +26% +25% +24% +23% Batumi City Senaki Tsageri Tetritskaro Tsalenjikha Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality RESULTS FOR 2019 1 61% Batumi 60 9% Samtredia 2 57% Rustavi 61 8% Adigeni 3 56% Lagodekhi 62 7% Aspindza NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF 4 55% Zugdidi 63 7% Ninotsminda GEORGIAN MUNICIPALITIES 5 52% Tetritskaro 64 6% Akhalkalaki (2019) 4 60 3 1 61 5 2 62 64 63 28% 31% 21% 24% 19% 25% 2017 2019 2017 2019 AVERAGE SCORE 2017 2019 MUNICIPAL COUNCIL CITY HALL Municipalities with Biggest Improvements Compared to 2017 www.lsgindex.org +34% +26% +25% +24% +23% Batumi City Senaki Tsageri Tetritskaro Tsalenjikha Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality Proactive Disclosure of Public Information Participation and Accountability Administrative General The Council of Civil Advisors 7% Expenses 50% Information is yet to be created in MUNICIPALITIES 11% 11 Legal 40% Entities Legal Acts and Court Decisions 19% 33% Budget Property Only 26 MAYORS MAJORITY OF MEMBERS of only 15 held public hearings of their municipal councils held public hearings of 29% performance reports their performance
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Law of Georgia on Changes to the Election
    Strasbourg, 13 January 2016 CDL-REF(2016)001 Opinion No. 834 / 2016 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ORGANIC LAW OF GEORGIA ON CHANGES TO THE ELECTION CODE OF GEORGIA (ON REDRAWING OF CONSTITUENCIES) ADOPTED ON 8 JANUARY 2016 This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-REF(2016)001 - 2 - Article 1. Organic Law of Georgia on the "Election Code of Georgia" (Legislative Herald of Georgia (www.matsne.gov.ge), 10.01.2012, registration code: 010190020.04.001.016032) shall be amended as follows: 1. Article 14, paragraph 1, subparagraph "e" shall be formed as follows: „e) by an ordinance, set up election districts and/or specify their boundaries in accordance with the procedures prescribed by this Law; ". 2. Article 18 shall be formed as follows: "Article 18. Election Districts 1. Election districts, their boundaries, titles and numbers shall be determined in accordance with this Law by a CEC ordinance, except for cases defined by paragraph 2 of this Article. 2. For the elections of the Parliament of Georgia, majoritarian districts shall be set up, their boundaries and numbers shall be determined in accordance with this Law and based on the procedures set by Articles 110 and 1101 of this Law." 3. Paragraph 2 of Article 19 shall be formed as follows: "2. The CEC is authorized to set up, by an ordinance, one DEC within boundaries of one or more self-governing units and 10 DECs in Tbilisi.". 4. Article 110 shall be formed as follows: "Article 110.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects of Ecotourism Development in Recreation Areas of South Georgia
    Accepted Manuscript Prospects of ecotourism development in recreation areas of South Georgia T.K. Khoshtaria, N.T. Chachava PII: S1512-1887(17)30097-0 DOI: 10.1016/j.aasci.2017.07.004 Reference: AASCI 130 To appear in: Annals of Agrarian Sciences Received Date: 15 May 2017 Revised Date: 1512-1887 1512-1887 Accepted Date: 29 June 2017 Please cite this article as: T.K. Khoshtaria, N.T. Chachava, Prospects of ecotourism development in recreation areas of South Georgia, Annals of Agrarian Sciences (2017), doi: 10.1016/ j.aasci.2017.07.004. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Annals of Agrarian Science vol. 15, no. 3, 2017 Prospects of Ecotourism Development in Recreation Areas of South Georgia T. K. Khoshtaria, N. T. Chachava Georgian Technical University, Faculty of Architecture, Urban Planning and Design 77, M. Kostava Str., Tbilisi, 0175, Georgia Received 15 May 2017; Accepted: 29 June2017 Correspondent author: Tamar Khoshtaria [email protected] A B S T R A C T This paper reviews the opportunities of ecotourism development in South Georgia, in particular, in the Gujareti valley located in Samtskhe-Javakheti region which has a rich tourism and recreation potential.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Approach for Participative Rural Development in Georgia – Refl Ecting Transfer of Knowledge and Enhancing Innovation in a Non-European Union Context
    Studies in Agricultural Economics 119 (2017) 48-54 https://dx.doi.org/10.7896/j.1012 Theresia OEDL-WIESER*, Thomas DAX* and Michael FISCHER** A new approach for participative rural development in Georgia – refl ecting transfer of knowledge and enhancing innovation in a non-European Union context Despite achieving independence 25 years ago, Georgia is still a country in transition which is striving to overcome wide- ranging economic development problems, particularly evident through out-migration from rural areas to urban centres and foreign countries, as well as through restricted employment integration. The ‘European Neighbourhood Programme for Agri- culture and Rural Development in Georgia’ focuses on local development in rural regions as a main national goal and offers a series of pilot actions to apply LEADER-like activities in various rural parts of the country. In this paper the application of such a pilot scheme in Borjomi Municipality, the observed case study in the Lesser Caucasus, is analysed. Reviews show a highly committed implementation process, comprising the establishment of the Local Action Group, the elaboration of the Local Development Strategy, an on-going mobilisation process of local actors and the transfer of experiences and good practices from European Union Member States. The assessment of the potential of the LEADER approach in the rural and mountainous area of Borjomi Municipality reveals a high degree of acceptance and interest of rural stakeholders and residents to taking up such an approach and engaging in innovative initiatives within the frame of sustainable rural development. Given the short period of work with these ideas so far, continued knowledge transfer, and enhanced appreciation and participation in search of place-specifi c opportunities in rural regions will be essential for successful rural development pathways across Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Georgian Road Map on Climate Change Adaptation
    The Georgian Road Map on Climate Change Adaptation 1 Foreword The National Association of Local Authorities of Georgia (NALAG) has been implementing a USAID-funded Initiative “Institutionalization of Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in Georgian Regions (ICCAMGR)” since 2012. The program is designed to foster climate change adaptation measures in regions of Georgia through the institutionalization of climate change adaptation and mitigation at the local and national levels by building the capacities of local authorities. The Project is a flagship initiative that integrates environmental and climate change considerations into the agendas of the local authorities of Georgia. The Project envisages establishment of special units on climate change, environment and sustainable agriculture at the level of self-government to ensure the implementation of a broad range of statutory functions of local authorities in terms of natural resources management, spatial planning and sustainable development stipulated in the “Organic Law of Georgia on Local Self-Government” and sectoral legislation. The Georgian Road Map on Climate Change Adaptation is an important contribution of the efforts of NALAG and the ICCAMGR project. 2 The Georgian Road Map on Climate Change Adaptation Tbilisi, 2016 This Publication is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of NALAG and authors of the texts and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. 3 List of Contributors Merab Gaprindashvili Co-author of Sections 3.5, 4.5, 5.5; also The National Environmental Agency of Georgia provided consultation on the relevant parts of the following sections: 3.1.2, 3.5.2, 3.6, 4.6.2 Emil Tsereteli, PhD.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study Georgia 2018
    OCTOBER 22, 2018 IVANE JAVAKHISHVILI TBILIISI STATE UNIVERSITY POSSIBILITIES OF SUSTAINABLE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN THE BOROUGH TSAGVERI TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH FOR SUSTAINABLE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN THE CAUCASUS REGION Tbilisi 1 A C K N O W L E D G M E N T The project CaucaSusT – Transdisciplinarity for Sustainable Tourism Development in the Caucasus Region is financed by APPEAR, a programme of the Austrian Development Cooperation. PREFACE | TSAGVERI COMMUNITY: A BRIEF OVERVIEW 4 RESEARCH METHODS 7 FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD PHASES OF THE STUDY 8 SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT 23 MAIN FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS 25 CONCLUSION 28 Lecturers and students participating in the practice P R E F A C E From 9 to 23 July, 2018 for the first time in Georgia a student field practice/Case-study by using a transdisciplinary approach to research was carried out. The Case-study was supported by the Austrian Development Cooperation Scientific Fund (OEAD) and funded through the project ‘Transdisciplinarity for Sustainable Tourism Development in the Caucasus Region’. The Case-study was conducted in the borough of Tsagveri, Borjomi municipality. 17 students and 5 professors of master’s programs of three faculties (of ‘Human Geography’ of the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, ‘Tourism and Hospitality’ of the faculty of Economics and Business, and ‘Regional Geography and Landscape Planning’ of the Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences) of Tbilisi State University (TSU) have participated in the Case-study. In the course of the Case-study Austrian scientists - Professor Andreas Muhar and Dr Tamara Mitrofanenko of BOKU, and Professor Cristian Maurer of the University of Krems - have also participated and delivered lectures/presentations.
    [Show full text]