Assessing and Developing the Eco-Tourism Potential of the Protected Areas in Georgia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Assessing and Developing the Eco-Tourism Potential of the Protected Areas in Georgia 1ST PHASE REPORT Final Transboundary Joint Secretariat for the Southern Caucasus ASSESSING AND DEVELOPING THE ECO-TOURISM POTENTIAL OF THE PROTECTED AREAS IN GEORGIA Contract number: 2008.65.550 / 2013.11.001 Version: Final 25.11.2014 Issue/Version No.: Final Contract No.: 2008.65.550 / 2013.11.001 Date: 25.11.2014 Contact Information: Paula Ruiz Rodrigo Österreichische Bundesforste AG Consulting Pummergasse 10-12 3002 Purkersdorf Austria T: +43 2231 600 5570 F: +43 2231 600 5509 [email protected] www.oebfconsulting.at Authors Janez Sirse / Lela Khartishvili Financed by: Transboundary Joint Secretariat / KfW ASSESSING AND DEVELOPING THE ECO- TOURISM POTENTIAL OF THE PROTECTED AREAS IN GEORGIA 1ST PHASE REPORT - FINAL CONTENT 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2 ASSESSMENT OF 7 SELECTED PROTECTED AREAS IN GEORGIA ............................... 2 2.1 Main documents used for assessment .................................................................... 2 2.2 Field visit assessment of 7 selected PAs ................................................................. 3 2.3 Workshop of Assessment – 1st phase findings ........................................................ 3 3 PROTECTED AREAS AND PROFILE OF SELECTED 7 PAs IN GEORGIA .......................... 4 4 TOURISM GUIDING PRINCIPLES IN PROTECTED AREAS ........................................... 8 5 BASIC CHARACTERISTICS OF TOURISM IN PROTECTED AREAS IN GEORGIA .............. 9 6 SWOT EVALUATION OF SELECTED PAs ................................................................ 14 7 PAs AND STAKEHOLDERS COOPERATION ............................................................. 20 7.1 Identified stakeholders of protected areas ............................................................ 20 7.2 DMO – Destination Management Organisation Model ............................................. 21 7.3 Association of Friends of Protected Areas ............................................................. 23 8 MARKET POTENTIAL FOR ECOTOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN PROTECTED AREAS IN GEORGIA ......................................................................................................... 25 8.1 Market segmentation......................................................................................... 25 8.2 Market potential to visit PAs ............................................................................... 26 9 TOURISM PRODUCTS AND POTENTIALS IN PAs .................................................... 28 9.1 Tourism products in PAs .................................................................................... 28 9.2 Potential tourism products in PAs ........................................................................ 30 10 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................. 33 11 ANNEXES ......................................................................................................... 36 ÖSTERREICHISCHE BUNDESFORSTE AG i ASSESSING AND DEVELOPING THE ECO- TOURISM POTENTIAL OF THE PROTECTED AREAS IN GEORGIA 1ST PHASE REPORT - FINAL ANNEXES Annex 1 Project field visit realization ............................................................................... 36 Annex 2 List of participants on the meetings during field visits ............................................ 38 Annex 3 Workshop 1st Phase programme and list of participants ....................................... 42 Annex 4 Minutes of Workshop 1st Phase .......................................................................... 45 Annex 5 Workshop 1st Phase assessment of ecotourism potentials in PAs in Georgia presentation (power point) ................................................................................. 50 Annex 6: Working Material Assessing the 7 selected Protected Areas .................................... 84 ÖSTERREICHISCHE BUNDESFORSTE AG ii ASSESSING AND DEVELOPING THE ECO- TOURISM POTENTIAL OF THE PROTECTED AREAS IN GEORGIA 1ST PHASE REPORT - FINAL LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Map of existing and planned protected areas in Georgia by the END of 2014 .............. 4 Figure 2: Training needs in 7 Protected Areas in Georgia ...................................................... 7 Figure 4: Main motives for visiting PAs from March – October 2013 (in%) ............................. 11 Figure 5: Main tourist activities during visits in PAs from March – October 2013 (in %) ........... 11 Figure 6: Accommodation used by tourist during the trip in PAs (2013) ................................ 12 Figure 7: Main sources of information of PAs in 2013 (in %) ................................................ 12 Figure 8: The most exposed and important SWOT elements in PAs in Georgia ....................... 14 Figure 9: SWOT analysis of Protected Areas in Georgia ....................................................... 15 Figure 10: SWOT analysis of surrounding areas - destinations of PAs ................................... 17 Figure 11: Identification of main tourism related stakeholders in PAs in Georgia .................... 20 Figure 12: Membership structure of DMOs – Destination management organisations .............. 22 Figure 13: Distribution of international arrivals to Goergia by main categories of visitors and type of destination visited during their stay in Georgia in 2013 ........................ 27 Figure 14: Motivation of eco-tourists to visit nature and Protected Areas .............................. 28 Figure 15: Activities of eco-tourist during ecotrip ............................................................... 29 Figure 16: Identification of existing tourism products and services in selected PAs in Georgia (status mid year 2014) ............................................................................... 29 Figure 17: Potential tourism products in Protected Areas in Georgia (status mid year 2014) .... 30 ÖSTERREICHISCHE BUNDESFORSTE AG iii ASSESSING AND DEVELOPING THE ECO- TOURISM POTENTIAL OF THE PROTECTED AREAS IN GEORGIA 1ST PHASE REPORT - FINAL LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Basic information of selected protected (status end of 2013) .................................... 6 Table 2: Number and structure of employees in selected PAs (status end of 2013) ................... 6 Table 3: Matrix of tourism compatibility and profiles of eco-tourists according to category and management purpose of PAs ................................................................... 8 Table 4: Number of visitors to Protected Areas in Georgia from 2007 till October 2014 ............. 9 Table 5: Main countries of origin of foreign visitors to Protected Areas in Georgia in 2013 ....... 10 Table 6: Intensity of visitation to Protected Areas in Georgia ............................................... 10 Table 7: Main observations of visitors about positive and negative experiences while visiting PAs ................................................................................................ 13 Table 8: Evaluation of potential demand to visit selected protected areas in Georgia .............. 27 ÖSTERREICHISCHE BUNDESFORSTE AG iv ASSESSING AND DEVELOPING THE ECO- TOURISM POTENTIAL OF THE PROTECTED AREAS IN GEORGIA 1ST PHASE REPORT - FINAL ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS APA Agency for Protected Areas BKNP Borjomi Kharagauli National Park BTA Batumi Tourism Agency CBD Convention on Biodiversity CBT Community Based Tourism CNF Caucasus Nature Fund DMC Destinantion Management Company DMO Destination Management Organization GITOA Georgia Incomming Tour Operators Association GNTA Georgia National Tourism Administration GTA Georgia Tourism Association IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature KfW Kreditanstallt fuer Wiederaufbau MoE Ministry of Environment Protection and Natural Resources NACRES Centre for Biodiversity Conservation and Research NGO Non - Governmental Organization NP National Park PA Protected Area SSPA Support Programme for Protected Areas in the Caucasus TIC Tourist Information Center TJS Transboundary Joint Secretariat for the Southern Caucasus UNDP United nations Development Programme UNEP United Nations Environment Programme USAID United States Agency for International Development UNWTO United Nations World Tourism Organization WB World Bank WWF World Wildlife Fund ÖSTERREICHISCHE BUNDESFORSTE AG v ASSESSING AND DEVELOPING THE ECO- TOURISM POTENTIAL OF THE PROTECTED AREAS IN GEORGIA 1ST PHASE REPORT - FINAL 1 INTRODUCTION The project „Assessing and development the eco-tourism potential of the protected areas in Georgia” started with its implementation on 28th July 2014. The overall objective of the study is to strengthen the tourism services and tourism revenues for Protected Area in Georgia contributing to further development of the tourism sector in Georgia and to financial sustainability, contributing to anchoring responsible tourism principles into Georgia’s tourism sector and contributing to the image of Georgia as attractive tourist destination. A short inception phase gave to project team insight into basic problems of tourism development of protected areas in Georgia and expectations of the beneficiary and the client. The expert team met the most important institutions and individuals forming a wide and strong coalition for development of protected areas in Georgia. At this stage experts collected basic documents, materials and data, discussed the project plan and prepared an operational work plan for project implementation that will meet
Recommended publications
  • As the Museum of Decorative-Applied Arts
    Terms of Reference Preparation of Museography for the “New Cavalry House” (Cavalry Corps) as the Museum of Decorative-Applied Arts Museum Exposition Concept, Interior Design and Management Plan 1: INTRODUCTION The Municipal Development Fund of Georgia (hereinafter the employer) is a legal entity of public law whose purpose is to mobilize financial resources from donors including international and Georgian financial institutions, in order to make them available for investments in local infrastructure and services, while simultaneously helping local self-governments in strengthening their institutional and financial capacity. The MDF programs envisage the implementation of various projects including the Third Regional Development Project financed by the World Bank and the Government of Georgia (GoG). The aim of the project is to promote tourism development in Mtskheta-Mtianeti and Samtskhe-Javakheti Regions. Site location and description The Decorative-Applied Arts Museum (“New Cavalry House”) is located in Borjomi Municipality, in the city of Borjomi. Borjomi is outstanding among the Georgian Spa resorts and owns the origin of the mineral water brand, “Borjomi”. Borjomi Gorge has great and significant resources and potentials for the development of cultural tourism. Besides the richness in culture and the presence of relevant monuments of cultural heritage, the natural landscape is of incomparable beauty. The extremely favourable location of Borjomi town and the numerous places of interest (among which area: Likani complex, Borjomi-Kharagauli National Park, alpine ski resort Bakuriani, Vardzia, Akhaltsikhe Rabati and Historical Museum of Samtskhe-Javakheti, Abastumani resort) make it an important tourist destination. Borjomi has a big advantage over other tourist destinations: it is located next to the National Borjomi-Kharagauli Park, the largest National Park in Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report, Volume 1
    TRANSMISSION GRID STRENGTHENING PROJECT CONSTRUCTION OF AKHALTSIKHE - BATUMI 220KV POWER TRANSMISSION LINE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Volume 1 - Main Text Revision V15 28th of March, 2014 DG Consulting Ltd Address: 10, Mirza Gelovani Street, 0160, Tbilisi, Georgia; Reg No 205 280 998; Tel: +995 322 380 313; +995 599 500 778;e‐mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng_V15 Page 2 of 345 Signatures chapter Prepared by: DG Consulting Ltd Prepared for: AGL- Adjaristsqali Georgia LLC Revision Table chapter Revised Part of Revision # Reason of Revision Document 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Entire document - Elaboration of missing sections _V03 - QC/QA procedure of DG Consulting - Comments of AGL 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Entire document - Comments of AGL, WB and _V04 GSE 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Entire document - QC/QA procedure of DG _V05/V06 Consulting 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Entire document - Comments of AGL, WB and _V07 GSE 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Entire document - QC/QA procedure of DG _V08/V09 Consulting 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Section 5 – ESIA WB comments _V10 Methodology Section 7 – Sensitive Receptors and Potential Impacts Section 8 – Impact Mitigation 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Entire document - QC/QA procedure of DG _V11 Consulting 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Section 10 - Public The section elaborated on ALG _V12 Consultation Activities request 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Signatures chapter ALG comments _V13 Revision Table Chapter 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng The cover page
    [Show full text]
  • Realizing the Urban Potential in Georgia: National Urban Assessment
    REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA National Urban Assessment ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA NATIONAL URBAN ASSESSMENT ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2016 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2016. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-92-9257-352-2 (Print), 978-92-9257-353-9 (e-ISBN) Publication Stock No. RPT168254 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Asian Development Bank. Realizing the urban potential in Georgia—National urban assessment. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2016. 1. Urban development.2. Georgia.3. National urban assessment, strategy, and road maps. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. This publication was finalized in November 2015 and statistical data used was from the National Statistics Office of Georgia as available at the time on http://www.geostat.ge The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • Borjomi Local Development Strategy
    Borjomi Local Development Strategy 2016‐2019 June 1, 2016 BORJOMI LOCAL ACTION GROUP www.borjomilag.ge The development of this Local Development Strategy has been financially support by the European Union under the ENPARD project “A New Approach for Rural Development in Georgia” implemented by Mercy Corps. Technical support was provided by the Austrian Federal Institute for Less Favoured and Mountainous Areas (BABF), with additional input from the project partners, Angus Council in Scotland and Borjomi Municipality. 2 Contents 1. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 4 2. General Overview of Borjomi Municipality ..................................................................................... 5 3. Analysis of the Development Needs ............................................................................................... 6 3.1 Description of the region ......................................................................................................... 6 3.1.2 Socio‐economic situation ................................................................................................ 7 3.1.3 Education and qualification ............................................................................................. 8 3.1.4 Agriculture ....................................................................................................................... 8 3.1.5 Bio‐diversity ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Update to the Market Analysis Samtskhe Javakheti
    UPDATE TO THE MARKET ANALYSIS SAMTSKHE JAVAKHETI ALLIANCES LESSER CAUCASUS PROGRAMME ALLIANCES LESSER CAUCASUS PROGRAMME INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 3 SUMMARY MARKET ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................ 3 THE KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ALLIANCES-SJ PROGRAMME AREA ............................................................ 9 The Programme Area ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Summary of the poulation ........................................................................................................................... 11 CORE MARKET SYSTEMS ................................................................................................................................ 11 DAIRY: COWS, BUFFALO, SHEEP ............................................................................................................................... 11 Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... 12 Womens roles in the dairy sector ................................................................................................................. 12 MEAT .................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Separation of Powers Program
    PROMOTING RULE OF LAW IN GEORGIA (PROLoG) CA # AID-114-A-15-00004 QUARTERLY REPORT YEAR THREE APRIL 1, 2017 – JUNE 30, 2017 1 PROMOTING RULE OF LAW IN GEORGIA ACTIVITY (PROLoG) QUARTERLY REPORT YEAR THREE APRIL 1, 2017 – JUNE 30, 2017 Prepared under the USAID’s Promoting Rule of Law in Georgia (PROLoG) Activity, Cooperative Agreement Number AID-114-A-15-00004 Submitted to: USAID/Georgia as of July 28, 2017 Implementer East-West Management Institute, Inc. Responsible Parties: Giorgi Chkheidze, Chief of Party, Tbilisi, [email protected] Mark Dietrich, Project Director, Washington, D.C. [email protected] Disclaimer This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of East-West Management Institute, Inc. and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government 2 TABLE OF ACRONYMS ACCESS Advancing CSO Capacities and Engaging Society for Sustainability ADR Alternative Dispute Resolution CA Cooperative Agreement CEPEJ European Community for the Efficiency of Justice CIDA Civil Development Agency CRRC Caucasus Resource Research Center CLE Continuing Legal Education COE Council of Europe COP Chief of Party DCOP Deputy Chief of Party ECtHR European Court of Human Rights EHRAC European Human Rights Advocacy Centre EMC Human Rights Education and Monitoring Center EWMI East-West Management Institute Free-Uni Free University of Tbilisi GDI Georgian Democracy Imitative GBA Georgian
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Development Programme of Georgia 2018-2021 Table of Contents
    REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME OF GEORGIA 2018-2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………7 II. Foreword……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………17 II.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................17 II.2 Legal provisions......................................................................................................................................................................................................................17 II.3 Programming system ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................18 III.II.4 SituationThe institutional and trends framework with regard of regional to territorial policy................................ cohesion and ................................competitiveness................................…………………………………………………….........................................................2119 II.5 Donor support..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................20 III.1 General context .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Project Proposal on Development of Tourism in the Javakheti National Park Support Zone
    Detailed Project Proposal on Development of Tourism in the Javakheti National Park Support Zone 2012 - 2013 Content: 1. Project Primary Information and Situational Analysis 2. Description of the Problem and Project Objectives Subsequent from the Problems 3. Project Objectives and Feasible Outcomes 4. Link between Planned Components and the Establishment of the Javakheti National Park in Georgia Project 5. Criteria and Methods for Selection of Beneficiaries 6. Number of Beneficiaries and its Substantiation in accordance with Poverty, Gender Balance and Other Factors 7. Project Implementation Stages and Activities 8. Project Implementation Detailed Schedule (Chart for Summarising Distribution of Activities in Timeline) 9. Detailed Budget of the Project 10. Economic Indicators and Calculation 11. Risks and Assumptions that May Impact on Achieving Goals and Mitigation Strategies 12. Project Implementation Methodology Responsibilities of Implementing Parties 13. Substantiation of Project Sustainability 14. Efficiency Indicators of Project Implementation 15. Project Implementation Monitoring Chart and Methods 16. Additional Information 17. Appendices: Appendix 1 – Study Programmes in Accordance with Training Courses Appendix 2 – Chart for Summarising Distribution of Activities in Timeline Appendix 3 - Questionnaire on Public Perception and Monitoring and Evaluation of Social Impact Appendix 4 - List of Potential Guides Appendix 5 – Business Plans Appendix 6 – Project Budget 2 1. Project Primary Information and Situational Analysis Javakheti is located in the southern part of Georgia. Geographically, it is located in the extreme northern part of the country’s Middle East Highland. The north of Javakheti is bordered by the Trialeti Ridge Slopes while the eastern and southern parts are surrounded by the Abul-Samsar and Javakheti Ranges which gradually transform into Turkey’s north-eastern plateau (the Childir “Çildir” Lake area).
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    SFG2732 Public Disclosure Authorized THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT OF THE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM DEVELOPMENT STARTEGIES OF SAMTSKHE-JAVAKHETI AND MTSKETA-MTIANETI Public Disclosure Authorized Third Regional Development Project Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized December, 2016 Abbreviations GNTA Georgia National Tourism Administration EIA Environnemental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan RDS Regional Development Strategy RTDS Regional Tourism Development Strategy MDF Municipal Development Fund of Georgia MoA Ministry of Agriculture MoENRP Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia MoCMP Ministry of Culture and Monument Protection MESD Ministry of Economic and Sustaineble Developmnet NACHP National Agency for Cultural Heritage Protection PIU Project Implementation Unit RDP Regional Development Project SECHSA Strategic Environmental, Cultural Heritage and Social Assessment WB World Bank Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 THIRD REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (RDP III) ..................................................... 12 1.2 REGIONAL AND SECTORAL CONTEXT: RDS AND RTDS FOR SAMTSKHE- JAVAKHETI AND MTSKHETA-MTIANETI REGIONS ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EU-Funded Rural Development Initiatives in Borjomi Municipality
    ENPARD I – EU-funded Rural Development Initiatives in Borjomi Municipality N Borjomi Local Project Location EU Grant Implementer’s Co- Employment/Beneficiaries Development (GEL) financing (GEL) Strategy (LDS) Women Men Total priority areas 1. Tourism Provision of Rafting Village 56 520 GEL 37 680 GEL 12 employed 13 employed 25 employed service on the river Chitakhevi 11 youth 10 youth 21 youth 2000 Benef. 2. Tourism Synchronic Translation Town 36 420 GEL 24 280 GEL 2 Employed 2 Employed service provision Borjomi 1 youth 1 youth 1500 Benef. 3. Tourism Improvement of the ski Borough 18 000 GEL 12 000 GEL 1 Employed 4 employed 5 employed rental service for the Bakuriani 1 youth 2 youth 3 youth Tourists 1800 Benef. 4. Tourism Attraction service and Borough 75 000 GEL 75 000 GEL 9 Employed 9 Employed 18 Employed adventure tours for the Bakuriani 4 youth 2 youth 6 youth tourists 5000 Benef. 5. Tourism Souvenir development for Village Tba 6 420 GEL 4 280 GEL 1 Employed 4 Employed 5 Employed Borjomi municipality 1 youth 3 youth 4 youth 30 Benef. 50 Benef. 80 Benef. 6. Tourism Adventure service Borjomi- 19 200 GEL 12 800 GEL 1 Employed 4 Employed 5 Employed development for the Bakuriani 3 youth 3 youth tourists, organization of the 600 Benef. tours 7. Tourism Guest House establishment Village 26 688 GEL 26 688 GEL 4 Employed 2 Employed 6 Employed in the remote area Tabatskuri 2 youth 1 youth 3 youth Remote Area 350 Benef. 8. Tourism Borjomi Valley virtual Borjomi 63 000 GEL 42 000 GEL 2 3 5 Employed tours Employe d 2 Employed 1 youth 3 youth youth 150 Benef.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Agency: Social Service Agency, LEPL
    Chapter V Affordable, Quality Healthcare and Social Security 1.1. Social Security of Population (Program Code: 35 02) Implementing Agency: Social Service Agency, LEPL 1.1.1. Pension Payments to Population (Program Code: 35 02 01) • Beneficiaries of state pensions and state compensations envisaged in Laws of Georgia on State pension, State Commensations and State Academic Bursaries have been paid pensions through financing the commitments made by the State on pension payments; • State pensions have been paid in January to over 708.1 thousand individuals, in February – to over 708.6 thousand individuals, in March – to over 709.4 thousand individuals, in April – to over 710.6 thousand individuals, in May – to over 711.5 thousand individuals, in June – to over 713.0 thousand individuals, in July – to over 714,2 thousand individuals, in August – to over 716.3 thousand individuals, in September – to over 717.8 thousand individuals, while state compensations have been paid in January-February to over 20.7-20.7 thousand beneficiaries, in March – to over 20.8 thousand beneficiaries, in April-May – to over 20.9-20.9 thousand beneficiaries, in June – to over 20.8 thousand beneficiaries and July-September - to over 20.9-20.9 thousand beneficiaries. Total expenditure towards this end in the reporting period has been 1 153.1 MLN GEL. 1.1.2. Social Security of Targeted Groups of Population (Program Code: 35 02 02) • Number of beneficiaries getting subsistance minimum in January has amounted over 407.3 thousand individuals, February – over 422.0 thousand
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1. Baseline Survey for Akhalkalaki LDS Development
    Appendix 1: Baseline Survey for Akhalkalaki LDS Development Study of the Community Problems and Needs Baseline Survey for Akhalkalaki LDS Development Study of the Community Problems and Needs Prepared by GRDD of GIPA Tbilisi, 2017 Appendix 1: Baseline Survey for Akhalkalaki LDS Development Study of the Community Problems and Needs Table of Contents 1. Background of the baseline survey .............................................................................. 3 2. Survey design and methodology .................................................................................. 3 2.1. Overall baseline survey design and methodology ................................................................ 3 2.2. Survey sites ....................................................................................................................... 3 2.3. Data Collection ................................................................................................................. 4 2.3.1. Study population and sampling strategy .............................................................................. 4 2.3.2. Group discussion .................................................................................................................. 5 2.3.3. Key informant interview ....................................................................................................... 5 2.3.4. Data collection, registration, processing, and analysis ....................................................... 5 2.3.5. Survey team and organization .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]