The Africa Solidarity Trust Fund (ASTF)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Africa Solidarity Trust Fund (ASTF) Africa Solidarity Trust Fund (ASTF) Transforming resources into development solutions Final report 2014–2018 Africa Solidarity Trust Fund (ASTF) Transforming resources into development solutions Final report 2014–2018 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2019 Required citation: FAO. 2019. Africa Solidarity Trust Fund (ASTF). Transforming resources into development solutions. Final report 2014–2018. Rome. 84 pp. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. © FAO, 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that FAO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the FAO logo is not permitted. If the work is adapted, then it must be licensed under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If a translation of this work is created, it must include the following disclaimer along with the required citation: “This translation was not created by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original [Language] edition shall be the authoritative edition. Disputes arising under the licence that cannot be settled amicably will be resolved by mediation and arbitration as described in Article 8 of the licence except as otherwise provided herein. The applicable mediation rules will be the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/mediation/rules and any arbitration will be conducted in accordance with the Arbitration Rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). Third-party materials. Users wishing to reuse material from this work that is attributed to a third party, such as tables, figures or images, are responsible for determining whether permission is needed for that reuse and for obtaining permission from the copyright holder. The risk of claims resulting from infringement of any third-party-owned component in the work rests solely with the user. Sales, rights and licensing. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) and can be purchased through publications-sales@fao.org. Requests for commercial use should be submitted via: www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request. Queries regarding rights and licensing should be submitted to: copyright@fao.org. Cover photographs ©FAO Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................................................................................. v Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................................. vi Acronyms and abbreviations ...........................................................................................................................................vii Executive summary .............................................................................................................................................................. ix 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................1 2. Progress and achievements for 2014–2018 ............................................................................................................3 2.1. Contribution of the ASTF to FAO corporate results .....................................................................................3 2.2. Key achievements by thematic area .................................................................................................................4 2.2.1. Agribusiness, value chains and youth employment ...........................................................................5 2.2.2. Resilience and livelihood support ...........................................................................................................7 2.2.3. Food safety, security and nutrition..........................................................................................................8 2.2.4. Women’s empowerment......................................................................................................................... 10 2.3. Achievements in regional and subregional programmes .......................................................................11 2.3.1. Africa’s south–south cooperation facility for agriculture and food security ........................... 11 2.3.2. Promoting decent rural youth employment and entrepreneurship in agriculture and agribusiness .................................................................................................................. 13 2.3.3. Rural women’s empowerment in agriculture programme (RWEAP) ......................................... 14 2.3.4. Adoption of efficient and climate-smart agriculture practices in African SIDS ...................... 15 2.3.5. Creating agribusiness employment opportunities for youth through sustainable aquaculture systems and cassava value chains in Western Africa ....................... 16 2.3.6. Enhanced food security in urban areas in Central Africa through improved availability of locally produced food ................................................................................ 17 2.3.7. Promoting nutrition sensitive agricultural diversification to fight malnutrition and enhance youth employment opportunities in Eastern Africa ..................................................... 18 2.3.8. Strengthening controls of food safety threats, plant and animal pests and diseases for agricultural productivity and trade in Southern Africa ........................................................... 21 2.3.9. Enhancing capacity/risk reduction of emerging tilapia lake virus (TiLV) to African tilapia aquaculture ..................................................................................................................... 23 2.4 Country-specific projects ....................................................................................................................................23 2.4.1. Guinea ........................................................................................................................................................... 23 2.4.2. Liberia ........................................................................................................................................................... 25 2.4.3. Sierra Leone ................................................................................................................................................. 26 2.4.4. Central African Republic ......................................................................................................................... 27 2.4.5. South Sudan ................................................................................................................................................ 28 2.4.6. Ethiopia ........................................................................................................................................................ 29 2.4.7. Malawi .......................................................................................................................................................... 30 iii 2.4.8. Mali ................................................................................................................................................................ 31 2.4.9. Niger .............................................................................................................................................................. 32 3. General experiences, lessons and spin-off effects ..............................................................................................33 3.1. Technical experiences and lessons ..................................................................................................................33 3.1.1. Catalytic effects and leveraging ............................................................................................................ 33 3.1.2. Partnerships ................................................................................................................................................ 33 3.1.3. Capacity development ............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Republic of South Sudan "Establishment Order
    REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN "ESTABLISHMENT ORDER NUMBER 36/2015 FOR THE CREATION OF 28 STATES" IN THE DECENTRALIZED GOVERNANCE SYSTEM IN THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN Order 1 Preliminary Citation, commencement and interpretation 1. This order shall be cited as "the Establishment Order number 36/2015 AD" for the creation of new South Sudan states. 2. The Establishment Order shall come into force in thirty (30) working days from the date of signature by the President of the Republic. 3. Interpretation as per this Order: 3.1. "Establishment Order", means this Republican Order number 36/2015 AD under which the states of South Sudan are created. 3.2. "President" means the President of the Republic of South Sudan 3.3. "States" means the 28 states in the decentralized South Sudan as per the attached Map herewith which are established by this Order. 3.4. "Governor" means a governor of a state, for the time being, who shall be appointed by the President of the Republic until the permanent constitution is promulgated and elections are conducted. 3.5. "State constitution", means constitution of each state promulgated by an appointed state legislative assembly which shall conform to the Transitional Constitution of South Sudan 2011, amended 2015 until the permanent Constitution is promulgated under which the state constitutions shall conform to. 3.6. "State Legislative Assembly", means a legislative body, which for the time being, shall be appointed by the President and the same shall constitute itself into transitional state legislative assembly in the first sitting presided over by the most eldest person amongst the members and elect its speaker and deputy speaker among its members.
    [Show full text]
  • 20170331 Abyei
    Abyei Report Village Assessment Survey | Nov - Dec 2016 IOM OIM bomas functional functional reported villages are 73% education 73% health 52% presence of 21% deserted facilities facilities UXOs. RUMAMEER RUMAMEER MAJAK payams hosting the majority of IDPs ABYEI TOWN payams receiving the majority of returnees ALAL MAJAK MAIN SURVEY RECOMMENDATIONS MAIN RECOMMENDATION livelihood diversication Rehabilitate and Engage in sustained activities operationalize key public community-level dialogue infrastructure Ed Dibeikir Ramthil Raqabat Rumaylah Nyam Roba Nabek Umm Biura El Amma Mekeines Zerafat SUDABeida N Ed Dabkir Shagawah Duhul Kawak Al Agad Al Aza Meiram Tajiel Dabib Farouk Debab Pariang Um Khaer Langar Di@ra Raqaba Kokai Es Saart El Halluf Pagol Bioknom Pandal Ajaj Kajjam Majak Ghabush En Nimr Shigei Di@ra Ameth Nyak Kolading 15,685 Gumriak 2 Aguok Goli Ed Dahlob En Neggu Fagai 1,055 Dumboloya Nugar As Sumayh Alal Alal Um Khariet Bedheni Baar Todach Saheib Et Timsah Noong 13,130 Ed Derangis Tejalei Feid El Kok Dungoup Padit DokurAbyeia Rumameer Todyop Madingthon 68,372 Abu Qurun Thurpader Hamir Leu 12,900 Awoluum Agany Toak Banton Athony Marial Achak Galadu Arik Athony Grinঞ Agach Awal Aweragor Madul Northern Bahr Agok Unity State Lort Dal el Ghazal Abiemnom Baralil Marsh XX Population in need SOUTH SUDANMolbang Warrap State Ajakuao 0 25 50 km The boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the Government of the Republic of South Sudan or IOM. This map is for planning purposes only. IOM cannot guarantee this map is error free and therefore accepts no liability for consequential and indirect damages arising from its use.
    [Show full text]
  • Wartime Trade and the Reshaping of Power in South Sudan Learning from the Market of Mayen Rual South Sudan Customary Authorities Project
    SOUTH SUDAN CUSTOMARY AUTHORITIES pROjECT WARTIME TRADE AND THE RESHAPING OF POWER IN SOUTH SUDAN LEARNING FROM THE MARKET OF MAYEN RUAL SOUTH SUDAN customary authorities pROjECT Wartime Trade and the Reshaping of Power in South Sudan Learning from the market of Mayen Rual NAOMI PENDLE AND CHirrilo MADUT ANEI Published in 2018 by the Rift Valley Institute PO Box 52771 GPO, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya 107 Belgravia Workshops, 159/163 Marlborough Road, London N19 4NF, United Kingdom THE RIFT VALLEY INSTITUTE (RVI) The Rift Valley Institute (www.riftvalley.net) works in eastern and central Africa to bring local knowledge to bear on social, political and economic development. THE AUTHORS Naomi Pendle is a Research Fellow in the Firoz Lalji Centre for Africa, London School of Economics. Chirrilo Madut Anei is a graduate of the University of Bahr el Ghazal and is an emerging South Sudanese researcher. SOUTH SUDAN CUSTOMARY AUTHORITIES PROJECT RVI’s South Sudan Customary Authorities Project seeks to deepen the understand- ing of the changing role of chiefs and traditional authorities in South Sudan. The SSCA Project is supported by the Swiss Government. CREDITS RVI EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Mark Bradbury RVI ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH AND COMMUNICATIONS: Cedric Barnes RVI SOUTH SUDAN PROGRAMME MANAGER: Anna Rowett RVI SENIOR PUBLICATIONS AND PROGRAMME MANAGER: Magnus Taylor EDITOR: Kate McGuinness DESIGN: Lindsay Nash MAPS: Jillian Luff,MAPgrafix ISBN 978-1-907431-56-2 COVER: Chief Morris Ngor RIGHTS Copyright © Rift Valley Institute 2018 Cover image © Silvano Yokwe Alison Text and maps published under Creative Commons License Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Available for free download from www.riftvalley.net Printed copies are available from Amazon and other online retailers.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Progress Report on U.S. Government International Ebola Response and Preparedness Activities
    USAID Office of HHS Office of Inspector General Inspector General Quarterly Progress Report on U.S. Government International Ebola Response and Preparedness Activities Fiscal Year 2016, First Quarter | December 31, 2015 An Ebola response team from the Bong County Ebola treatment unit educates a town in Bong Mines, Liberia about Ebola. (Morgana Wingard for USAID, October 9, 2015) QUARTERLY REPORT ON EBOLA RESPONSE AND PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES Quarterly Progress Report on U.S. Government International Ebola Response & Preparedness December 31, 2015 FISCAL YEAR 2016, FIRST QUARTER ii QUARTERLY REPORT ON EBOLA RESPONSE AND PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Ebola Outbreak in West Africa 2 U.S. Government Response to the Ebola Outbreak 3 Funding Response, Preparedness, and Recovery Efforts 4 U.S. Government Efforts to Control the Outbreak 10 Transition from Response to Recovery 14 U.S. Government Recovery Efforts to Mitigate Second-Order Impacts 14 Food Security 14 Health Systems and Critical Non-Ebola Health Services 16 Governance and Economic Crisis Mitigation 19 Innovation and Communication Technology 20 U.S. Government Efforts to Strengthen Global Health Security 21 Oversight Activities 23 U.S. Agency for International Development OIG 24 Department of Health and Human Services OIG 27 Department of Defense OIG 28 Department of State OIG 29 Department of Homeland Security OIG 30 Government Accountability Office 30 Investigations 30 Appendix A: Telected Ebola Diagnostic Tools and Medical Countermeasures Supported by U.S. Government Agencies 31 Appendix B: USAID Ebola-related Programs by Pillar and Geographical Focus as of December 31, 2015 (Unaudited) 33 Appendix C: Acronyms 59 Appendix D: Endnotes 61 FISCAL YEAR 2016, FIRST QUARTER iii Children and families waiting to be screened at the Ola Children’s Hospital in Freetown, Sierra Leone.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Appeal Operation Update Ebola Virus Disease Emergency Appeals (Guinea, Liberia, Sierra Leone and Global Coordination & Preparedness)
    Emergency Appeal Operation Update Ebola Virus Disease Emergency Appeals (Guinea, Liberia, Sierra Leone and Global Coordination & Preparedness) Combined Monthly Ebola Operations Update No 281 15 December 2015 Current epidemiological situation + country-specific information The spread of Ebola in West Africa has slowed intensely, but enormous challenges remain in conquering this scourge while re-establishing basic social services and building resilience in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone. This unparalled outbreak has hit some of the most vulnerable communities in some of the world’s poorest countries. School children practicing proper handwashing before classes begin in Montserrado, Liberia in October 2015. LNRCS supported by IFRC has been distributing handwashing kits, soap, chlorine and no-touch thermometers to over On 20 November 2015, the Government 500 schools across the country. Photo: IFRC of Liberia confirmed three new cases of IFRC’s Ebola virus disease (EVD) strategic framework is organised around five Ebola from a family of six living in an area outcomes: of Monrovia. All the cases were transferred to an Ebola Treatment Unit (ETU). One of 1. The epidemic is stopped; the three confirmed cases, a boy, died on 2. National Societies (NS) have better EVD preparedness and stronger long-term capacities; 23 November. His brother and father continued with the treatment. 3. IFRC operations are well coordinated; 4. Safe and Dignified Burials (SDB) are effectively carried out by all actors; 5. Recovery of community life and livelihoods. There have not been any additional/new Helping stop the epidemic, the EVD operations employ a five pillar approach confirmed cases so far. A total of 166 comprising: (i) Beneficiary Communication and Social Mobilization; (ii) Contact contacts related to the current cluster were Tracing and Surveillance; (iii) Psychosocial Support; (iv) Case Management; and (v) Safe and Dignified Burials (SDB) and Disinfection; and the revision has listed and continued with daily follow-up.
    [Show full text]
  • NIGER : REGION DE MARADI/ZINDER Rapport Mensuel Er Du 1 Au 31 Mai 2020
    NIGER : REGION DE MARADI/ZINDER Rapport mensuel er Du 1 au 31 Mai 2020 Ce rapport est produit par OCHA Niger en collaboration avec les partenaires humanitaires. Il couvre la période du 1er au 31 mai 2020. FAITS SAILLANTS Situation sécuritaire La situation sécuritaire est relativement calme sur l’ensemble de la région, mais reste toutefois volatile dans la bande sud frontalière du Nigéria, en raison de la persistance des attaques criminelles. On assiste en effet à un regain d’insécurité dans le département de Guidan Roumdji particulièrement au niveau des communes de Guidan Roumdji et Guidan Sory frontalières avec l’Etat de Sokoto au Nigeria. Il s’agit le plus souvent d’attaques à mains armées et vols de bétails, occasionnant quelques fois des pertes en vies humaines et blessures corporelles. Onze attaques ont été enregistrées, dont 82% dans le département de Guidan Roumdji. Le bilan des dégâts occasionnés est de 02 personnes tuées, 02 blessés et plus d’un millier de têtes de bétail emporté. On constate par ailleurs, une accalmie apparente dans le département de Madarounfa avec un mouvement de retour de certaines personnes déplacées internes chez eux. Les forces de défense et de sécurité (FDS), notamment le Bataillon d'Intervention de Commandement des Opération Spéciales (BI-COS), la Compagnie Mobile de Contrôle Frontalière (CMCF) et les patrouilles départementales sont toujours présentes dans la zone frontalière pour assurer la sécurité des populations. Situation humanitaire 1. Situation sanitaire Situation des Maladies à Déclaration Obligatoire (MDO) Selon les données du SPIS sur les MDO, la région de Maradi a enregistré à la semaine 19 de l’année 2020 : 297 cas de rougeole pour 02 décès ; 190 713 cas de paludisme pour 111 décès.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of South Sudan Public Opinion April 24 to May 22, 2013 Survey Methodology
    Survey of South Sudan Public Opinion April 24 to May 22, 2013 Survey Methodology • The International Republican Institute (IRI) undertook a public opinion poll in all 10 states of South Sudan. Training of the poll researchers was performed by Opinion Research Business (ORB), an international opinion research firm. Fieldwork management, analysis, supervision and execution were done by IRI under critical guidance of ORB. • Data was collected via face-to-face interviews from April 24 – May 22, 2013. • The population studied was adults ages 18 and older. A representative random sample was designed based on the latest population estimates reported in the 2010 Statistical Yearbook for South Sudan. • The survey employed probability proportional to size (PPS) sampling methodology. The population of South Sudan was stratified first at the region level and then by the state level. Within each state, IRI and ORB then selected counties. This was done by creating a multi-stage probability sample. Enumeration areas within each county were selected using PPS; households within each enumeration area were then identified using a random walk method, the days code and a skip pattern; respondents were randomly chosen within households using a Kish grid. Every other interview was conducted with a female to try to achieve 50 percent gender parity. • The questionnaire was translated into Bari, Classical Arabic, Dinka, English, Juba Arabic and Nuer (portions of the questionnaire were orally translated into other languages by the interviewer). 2 Survey Methodology • The margin of error is +/- 1.9 percent. The margin of error for subsets (i.e. age/education/tribes/ etc.) is significantly higher and should be treated as indicative only.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport Sur Les Indicateurs De L'eau Et De L'assainissement
    REPUBLIQUE DU NIGER ----------------------------------------- FRATERNITE – TRAVAIL - PROGRES ------------------------------------------- MINISTERE DE L’HYDRAULIQUE ET DE L’ASSAINISSEMENT ---------------------------------------- COMITE TECHNIQUE PERMANENT DE VALIDATION DES INDICATEURS DE L’EAU ET DE L’ASSAINISSEMENT RAPPORT SUR LES INDICATEURS DE L’EAU ET L'ASSAINISSEMENT POUR L’ANNEE 2016 Mai 2017 Table des matières LISTE DES SIGLES ET ACRONYMES I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 II. DEFINITIONS ..................................................................................................................... 1 2.1. Définitions de quelques concepts et notions dans le domaine de l’hydraulique Rurale et Urbaine. ................................................................................................................ 1 2.2. Rappel des innovations adoptées en 2011 ................................................................... 2 2.3. Définitions des indicateurs de performance calculés dans le domaine de l’approvisionnement en eau potable ................................................................................... 3 2.4. Définitions des indicateurs de performance calculés dans le domaine de l’assainissement .................................................................................................................... 4 III. LES INDICATEURS DES SOUS – PROGRAMMES DU PROSEHA .......................... 4 IV. CONTRAINTES ET PROBLEMES
    [Show full text]
  • UN EBOLA RESPONSE MPTF ANNUAL PROJECT NARRATIVE REPORT Year: ___2017______
    UN EBOLA RESPONSE MPTF ANNUAL PROJECT NARRATIVE REPORT Year: ___2017________ Project Number and Title: PROJECT START AMOUNT RECIPIENT #65- Enhancing the post-Ebola national DATE1: ALLOCATED by ORGANIZATION preparedness capacity to efficiently 30-08-2017 MPTF UNDP, UNFPA, respond to future health outbreaks (please indicate different Project ID: 00106881 (Gateway ID) UNICEF, WHO, WFP tranches if applicable) $2,500,000 UNICEF: $446,033 UNDP: $795,031 UNFPA: $446,757 IMPLEMENTING WFP: $188,146 PARTNER(S): WHO: $624,033 Ministry of Health and Project Focal Point: EXTENSION DATE: FINANCIAL Public Hygiene Name: Theoneste Ganza N/A COMMITMENTS Ministry of Local Crisis Recovery/Humanitarian Administration and Coordination Specialist, RCO UNICEF: 125,500 US$ Decentralization UNDP: 0 US$ (MATD) Tel. +224 624 76 41 74 UNFPA: 208,724 US$ E-mail: Theoneste.ganza@one.un.org National Public Health WFP: 0 US$ Security Agency (ANSS) WHO: 0 US$ International Strategic Objective (STEPP) PROJECTED END EXPENDITURES Organization for SO5 – Prevent Outbreaks in countries DATE: as of [01/01/2018] Migrations (OIM)- not currently affected Recovery UNICEF: 134,285 US$ Central Pharmacy of 31-08-2018 Strategic Objectives UNDP: 175,857 US$ Guinea (PCG) RSO# - Description UNFPA: 0 US$ Ministry of Internal WFP: 0 US$ Security/Department of WHO: 60,000 US$ Civil Protection Ministry of Environment/National Mission Critical Action Center for MCA13 – Multi-faceted preparedness Environmental Risk Management Location: Sub-National Coverage Areas: Guinea nationwide All the 38 prefectures of Guinea Report Submitted by: Report Cleared by: o Name: Theoneste Ganza o Name: (Head of Agency): Lionel Laurens, Country Director o Title: Crisis Recovery Specialist o Date of Submission: 21-03-2018 o Date of Submission: 17-03-2018 o Participating Organization (Lead): UNDP o Participating Organization (Lead): UNDP o Email address: lionel.laurens@undp.org o Email address: Theoneste.ganza@undp.org 1 The date project funds were first transferred.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme Conjoint D'appui Au Developpement De La
    PROGRAMME CONJOINT D’APPUI AU DEVELOPPEMENT DE LA REGION DE MARADI (PCM) RAPPORT NARRATIF ANNUEL SUR L’ETAT D’AVANCEMENT DU PROGRAMME ER PERIODE DU RAPPORT : 1 JANVIER – 31 DECEMBRE 2015 ORGANISATIONS PARTICIPANTES ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L’ALIMENTATION ET L’AGRICULTURE ORGANISATION MONDIALE DE LA SANTE FONDS DES NATIONS UNIES POUR LA POPULATION FONDS DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L’ENFANCE PROGRAMME DES NATIONS UNIES POUR LE DEVELOPPMENT PROGRAMME ALIMENTAIRE MONDIAL UNITED NATIONS CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT FUND ONU FEMMES DONATEUR DES FONDS 2 Liste d’Abréviations et d’Acronymes AGR Activités Génératrices des Revenus ARV Anti-Rétro Viraux BCR Bureau du Coordonnateur Résident du système des NU BI Boutiques d’Intrants CRENI Centre de Récupération et d'Education Nutritionnelle Intensif CS Case de Santé CSI Centre de Santé Intégré DBC Distribution à Base Communautaire DS District Sanitaire HC3N Haut-Commissariat à l’Initiative 3N Infections Sexuellement Transmissibles/Virus Immunodéficience IST/VIH/SIDA Humaine/Syndrome Immuno Déficitaire Acquis GTTR Groupe technique de travail des NU sur la résilience NU Nations-Unies PCM Programme Conjoint Maradi PDC Plan de Développement Communal PTME Prévention de la Transmission Mère-Enfant du VIH PVVIH Personne vivant avec le Virus de l’Immunodéficience Humaine Surveillance Intégrée des Maladies et Riposte / Règlement Sanitaire SIMR/RSI International SNU Système des Nations-Unies UNCG Groupe thématique de communication des NU UNDAF Plan cadre des Nations Unies pour l’assistance au développement 3 PROGRAMME CONJOINT D’APPUI AU DEVELOPPEMENT DE LA REGION DE MARADI RAPPORT ANNUEL 2015 Titre du Programme et Référence du Projet Pays, Localité(s) : • Titre du Programme : Programme Conjoint NIGER-MARADI d’appui au développement de la Région de Secteur (s) Prioritaire (s) du Programme : Maradi (PCM) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Usaid/Guinea Annual Report Fy 2002
    USAID/GUINEA ANNUAL REPORT FY 2002 March 2002 Please Note: The attached RESULTS INFORMATION is from the FY 2002 Annual report, and was assembled and analyzed by the country or USAID operating unit identified on the cover page. The Annual Report is a “pre-decisional” USAID document and does not reflect results stemming from formal USAID review(s) of this document. Related document information can be obtained from: USAID Development Experience Clearinghouse 1611 N. Kent Street, Suite 200 Arlington, VA 22209-2111 Telephone: 703/351-4006 Ext. 106 Fax: 703/351-4039 Email: docorder@dec.cdie.org Internet: http://www.dec.org Released on or after July 1, 2002 3 Annual Report Part III: Performance Narrative A. Challenges and Responses: In addition to successfully responding to a formidable set of development conditions, USAID’s Guinea program was further challenged this year as the impact of the cross-border conflicts that continued into 2001 played out. Implementing partners working in the conflict- affected areas rapidly regrouped to mobilize resources to either start up in other parts of Guinea, or to concentrate efforts in other existing intervention zones. While the negative impacts of the disruption on achievements could not be avoided in all instances, significant results were nonetheless achieved in each Strategic Objective (SO) area and, overall, the program is on track. Encouraged by a successful formal Country Strategy Program mid-term review held in Washington, management attention turned to more closely aligning the program to the Global Pillars. To this end, working groups were established to more clearly reflect conflict prevention, HIV/AIDS and economic growth in current activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Arrêt N° 012/11/CCT/ME Du 1Er Avril 2011 LE CONSEIL
    REPUBLIQUE DU NIGER Fraternité – Travail – Progrès CONSEIL CONSTITUTIONNEL DE TRANSITION Arrêt n° 012/11/CCT/ME du 1er Avril 2011 Le Conseil Constitutionnel de Transition statuant en matière électorale en son audience publique du premier avril deux mil onze tenue au Palais dudit Conseil, a rendu l’arrêt dont la teneur suit : LE CONSEIL Vu la Constitution ; Vu la proclamation du 18 février 2010 ; Vu l’ordonnance n° 2010-01 du 22 février 2010 modifiée portant organisation des pouvoirs publics pendant la période de transition ; Vu l’ordonnance n° 2010-096 du 28 décembre 2010 portant code électoral ; Vu l’ordonnance n° 2010-038 du 12 juin 2010 portant composition, attributions, fonctionnement et procédure à suivre devant le Conseil Constitutionnel de Transition ; Vu le décret n° 2011-121/PCSRD/MISD/AR du 23 février 2011 portant convocation du corps électoral pour le deuxième tour de l’élection présidentielle ; Vu l’arrêt n° 01/10/CCT/ME du 23 novembre 2010 portant validation des candidatures aux élections présidentielles de 2011 ; Vu l’arrêt n° 006/11/CCT/ME du 22 février 2011 portant validation et proclamation des résultats définitifs du scrutin présidentiel 1er tour du 31 janvier 2011 ; Vu la lettre n° 557/P/CENI du 17 mars 2011 du Président de la Commission Electorale Nationale Indépendante transmettant les résultats globaux provisoires du scrutin présidentiel 2ème tour, aux fins de validation et proclamation des résultats définitifs ; Vu l’ordonnance n° 028/PCCT du 17 mars 2011 de Madame le Président du Conseil constitutionnel portant
    [Show full text]