July, 1984 USAID, Niamey NIGER IRRIGATION SUBSECTOR

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

July, 1984 USAID, Niamey NIGER IRRIGATION SUBSECTOR NIGER IRRIGATION SUBSECTOR ASSESSMENT VOLUME ONE MAIN REPORT July, 1984 Glenn Anders, Irrigation Engineer USAID, Niamey Walter Firestone, Agronomist Michael Gould, Environmental Specialist Emile Malek, Public Health Specialist Emmy Simmons, arming Systems Economist Malcolm Versel, Vegetable Marketing Teresa Ware, Institutional Analyst Tom Zalla, Team Leader NIGER IRRIGATION SUB-SECTOR A.SSESSMENT Table of Contents Paae EXECUTIV.E S==",R L­.. .......... i i. INTRODU2 0N...... ................. II. GOVERNMENT AND DONOR ACTIVITIES RELATED TO IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE ...... ........... 2 A. Government of Niger Institutions ....... 2 1, Ministrv of Rqal Development (MDR) . 2 2. Ministry of Hydrology and the Environment (AHE) ........... 3 3. Ministry of Higher Education and Research (MESR) ...... ............ 4 B. Donor Activities ....... ............. 4 III. IRRIGATION SYSTEMS IN NIGER .... ........ 5 A. Jointly Managed River Pumping Systems . 6 B. Jointly Managed Surface Dam Systems . 6 C. Jointly Managed Ground Water Pumping Systems ........................ 7 D. Individual Managed Micro-Irrigation Systems ......... ................. 7 IV. ENGINEERING ASPECTS OF IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE IN NIGER .......... .................. 8 A. Factors Influencing Development Costs . 9 1. Topography ........ ............... 9 2. Design Standards... ............ 11 3. Competition ..... .............. 12 4. Risk and Uncertainty... .......... .. 12 B. Water Supply and Management Problems. 13 C. System Maintenance. ............... 14 D. Feasibility of Promoting Small Scale Irrigation ........................ V. PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES AND AGRONOMIC CONSTRAINTS ...... ................ 17 A. Cropping Systems and Cultural Practices 17 1. Irrigated Rice Perimeters ........ 17 2. Surface Dam Systems .. .......... 17 3. Ground Water Pumping Systems ...... .. 18 4. Micro Irrigation Systems .... ........ 18 B. Agronomic Constraints on Increasing Yields Under Irrigation... ............ 19 VI. ECONOMIC AND FARMING SYSTEMS ASPECTS ...... 21 A. Costs and Returns to Irrigated Farming . 21 B. Farming Systems Constraints on Irrigated Production ..... .. ................ .. 23 VII. MARKETING ASPECTS OF IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE . 26 A. Marketing Systems. ............... 26 B. Demand for Irrigated Grains and Vegetables . 26 1. The National Demand for Cereals. ....... 26 2. The National Demand for Fresh Vegetables 27 3. The Interregional Demand for Fresh Vegetables ...... ................. 27 4. Demand for Dried Vegetables............ 27 C. Constraints on the Marketing of Vegstables . 28 1. The Timing of Production .. .......... 28 2. Market Access ... ................ 29 3. Storage and Preservation of Vegetables . 29 4. Entrepreneurial Capacity .. .......... 29 D. New Markets and Products ... ........... 30 VIII. INSTITUTIONAL, SOCIAL AND POLICY ISSUES ..... 31 A. Cooperatives ...... ................. 31 B. Extension and Training ... ............ 32 C. ONAHA......... ........... ..... .. 33 D. Research ...... ................... 34 E. Management System and Tand Tenure ....... ... 35 F. The Role of the Priva-e Sector ......... 35 IX. ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH ISSUES ..... 38 A. Water Resources..... ................ 38 B. Soils .............................. 39 C. Pesticides and Fertilizers .. .......... 39 D. Waterborne Diseases..... .............. 39 E. Measures for Improving Public Health Aspects of Irrigation Projects ... ............ 40 X. PROGRAM AND PROJECT POSSIBILITIES ........... 41 A. Improving Production Versus Expanding Irrigated Area ..... ................ 41 B. Choosing Priorities..... .............. 41 1. Critical Problems Which USAID Should Address. .................... 41 2. Problems Which USAID is Addressing in Existing Projects ..... .............. 42 3. Problems and Constraints Which USAID Would Not Address....................... 4. Program Areas Which USAID Might Address Along with Priority Problem Areas Under a Production Improvement Program ...... 43 C. Possible Project Alternatives ............ 44 1. Strengthening ONAHA.... ............. 44 2. Privatizing Extension... ............ 45 NIGR IRRIGATION SUBSECTOR ASSESSMENT Table of Contents VOLUME TWO: ANNEXES ANNEX A: DONOR ACTIVITIES RELATING TO IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE ANNEX A-1 B: IRRIGATED PERIMETERS IN INIGER: EXISTING AND UNDER WAY B-I ANNEX C: AGRONOMIC ASPECTS OF IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE IN NIGER C-I ANNEX D: THE ECONOMICS OF IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT AND PERFORMANCE IN NIGER ANNEX D-I E: VEGETABLE MARKETING IN NIGER E-1 ANNEX F: INSTITUTIONAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES RELATED TO IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE IN NIGER ANNEX F-I G: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OF IRRIGAlION IN NIGER G-I ANNEX H: PROGRAM AND PROJECT POSSIBILITIES ANNEX H-I I: TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR VEGETABLE MARKETING STUDY I-I ANNEX J: IMPACT OF IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE ON PUBLIC HEALTH IN NIGER WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SCHISTOSOMIASIS J-1 ANNEX K: ASSESSMENT OF THE ENGINEERING ASPECTS OF IRRIGATION IN NIGER K-I NIGER IRRIGATION SECTOR ASSESSMENT Executive Summary Background Of over 9,000 hectares of irrigation schemes established in Niger since independence, only 5,500 hectares were actually in production in 1983. Existin, irrigated area is falling out of production at the rate of 12% per year. More­ over, irrigated land still in production 's producing well below its agronomic potential. This state of affairs is a source of concern to donors who see the development of irrigated agriculture in Niger as crucial to the country's abi­ lity to feed itself over the longer term. The purpose of this report is to identify the reasons for this substantial underachievement of potential and to suggest areas where !SAID might most effectively focus its develooment assis­ tance for this subsector. Responsibility for irrigated agriculture in Niger is divided principally between the Genie Rural, the Office National des Amenagements Hydro-A ricoles (ONAHA) and TF-Ministry of Hydrology and the Environment (HHE). The Genie Rural is responsible for design and for supervising construction; ONAHA, for implementation, management and maintenan>e )f irrigated perimeters; and the MHE for collecting and analyzing information on surface and groundwater. The FED, FAC, 1BRD, CCCE, KF1! and Kuwait are the most active donors workin( in irrigation. At the present time, Niger has under construction or committed for donor financing over 5,500 hectares of new perimeters. Another 4,000 hec­ tares are scheduled for rehabilitation. Donors generally provide training, credit and technical assistance for the perimeters which they finance. Irrigation Systems Niger has four predominant types of irrigation systems. Jointly managed river pumping systems are located on the flood plains and terraces of the Niger River. They generally produce a double crop of rice. These account for about half of all irrigated land. Jointly managed surface dam systems are found in and near the Maggia Val­ ley. They account for about 20% of Niger's developed irrigated area. Cotton and sorghum are the principal rainy season crops grown on these perimeters whict essentially provide only supplemental irrigation. Less than 25% of the land produces anything during the dry season because of a lack of water in the reser­ voirs. Vegetables, wheat, millet and other crops dominate dry season cropping systems on these perimeters. Niger is just completing development of its first medium-scale, jointly managed groundwater pumping system at Djiratawa, on the Goulbi Maradi. This system accounts for less than 2-1/2% of Niger's irrigated area, but being a tube-well system, it offers promise for developing vast shallow river valleys where surface reservoirs tend to silt up and experience very high rates of ii evaporation. Because of the more reliable water supply, dry season vegetables are more important on the groundwater pumping systems than on the other nonrice perimeters. Individual managed micro-irrigation systems probably account for somewhere around 25% of Niger's total irrigated area at the present time. These are generally small, family-sized systems, ranging in size from a quarter hectare to two hectares. On these systems, farmers draw water from wells six meters deep or less, using various manual methods, and generally produce high valued vege­ tables--more often than not, onions. Small scale irrigation is found in all four systems. Small scale systems tend to be 2-20 hectares in size, but thpir crucial identifying characteristic is their management system, not thei- size. Small scale systems tend to be initiated and managed by a group of farmers or individual households, with mini­ mal or no assistance from 2xtcrnal sources. The cost of developing one hectare of medium scale irriqated perimeter in Niger is high, even by Sahelian standards, amounting to four to six million FCFA per hectare. Key facto'rs accounting for the relatively high cost include diffi­ cult topography, unnecessarily high design standards, a lack of competition in bidding for construction contracts and political risks and uncertainty. Water Supply and Management Water supply and manaiement appear to be a problem on virtually every peri­ meter. Reduced rainfall has lowered the flow of the river and reduced the inflow into the inland reservoirs. At the same time, heavy siltation has re­ duced the stGrage capacity of the reservoirs and greatly reduced their ability to provide adequate water for dry season irrigation. Unnecessarily long pumping periods, excessive application of water, poorly cleaned canals and poorly leveled fields all compound
Recommended publications
  • L 2Did-2Dii Sommaire Preambule
    I M l fllütK fi*iiianiiiâ iru'/ail rVugras ia i Rapport Général Public L 2DID-2DII SOMMAIRE PREAMBULE.........................................................................................................................................................7 Extrait de la délibération portant approbation du Rapport Général Public..............................8 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................................9 PREMIERE PARTIE : PRESENTATION DE LA COUR...............................................................10 1.1- Le cadre institutionnel...................................................................................................................................11 1.2- Les missions ................................................................................................................................................... 11 1.3- La composition...............................................................................................................................................12 1.4- L’organisation.................................................................................................................................................. 12 1.5- Les moyens de fonctionnement................................................................................................................ 13 1.6- La coopération internationale ....................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Niger Valley Development Programme Summary of the Updated Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
    Kandadji Ecosystems Regeneration and Niger Valley Development Programme Summary of the Updated Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Language: English Original: French AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP PROJECT TO SUPPORT THE KANDADJI ECOSYSTEMS REGENERATION AND NIGER VALLEY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (P_KRESMIN) COUNTRY: NIGER SUMMARY OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) Mohamed Aly BABAH Team Leader RDGW2/BBFO 6107 Principal Irrigation Engineer Aimée BELLA-CORBIN Chief Expert, Environmental and Social SNSC 3206 Protection Expert Nathalie G. GAHUNGA RDGW.2 3381 Chief Gender Expert Gisèle BELEM, Senior Expert, Environmental and Social SNSC 4597 Protection Team Members Parfaite KOFFI SNSC Consulting Environmentalist Rokhayatou SARR SAMB Project Team SNFI.1 4365 Procurement Expert Eric NGODE SNFI.2 Financial Management Expert Thomas Akoetivi KOUBLENOU RDGW.2 Consulting Agroeconomist Sector Manager e Patrick AGBOMA AHAI.2 1540 Sector Director Martin FREGENE AHAI 5586 Regional Director Marie Laure. AKIN-OLUGBADE RDWG 7778 Country Manager Nouridine KANE-DIA CONE 3344 Manager, Regional Mouldi TARHOUNI RDGW.2 2235 Agricultural Division Page 1 Kandadji Ecosystems Regeneration and Niger Valley Development Programme Summary of the Updated Environmental and Social Impact Assessment SUMMARY OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) Project Name : Project to Support the Kandadji Ecosystems SAP Code: P-NE-AA0-020 Regeneration and Niger Valley Development Programme Country : NIGER Category : 1 Department : RDGW Division : RDGW.2 1. INTRODUCTION Almost entirely located in the Sahel-Saharan zone, the Republic of Niger is characterised by very low annual rainfall and long dry spells. The western part of country is traversed by the Niger River, which is Niger’s most important surface water resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Narrative Report
    01/01/2019-31/12/2019 Agro-pastoral mediation in the Sahel region NARRATIVE REPORT 1 January to 31 December 2019 Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue 114 rue de Lausanne CH 1202 Geneva Tél : +41 22 908 11 30 www.hdcentre.org June 2020 Page 1 out of 8 01/01/2019-31/12/2019 1. Evaluation of the implementation of the activities of the action and of the results In the Sahel, agropastoral activities are highly dependent on climate variability. As a result, agropastoralists are constantly looking for strategies to enable them to effectively adapt their production systems to climate change. In recent years, politico-military crises and the occupation of certain areas by violent extremist groups have greatly disrupted traditional animal movements and caused a crisis of confidence between pastoral and agro-pastoral communities sharing the same geographical spaces and resources and have resulted in an increase in violence By the end of 2019, the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue (HD) was supporting a network of 961 community mediators spread across 58 border communities in Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Mauritania and Niger in their efforts to resolve conflicts over access to natural resources. This network of mediators resolved 105 micro-conflicts and facilitated the return of 229 head of cattle, two plots of land and two motorcycles to their owners. This work reflects the project's objective to prevent the transformation of micro-conflicts into inter-community conflicts that could be triggered by armed groups operating in the Sahel region. Denmark and the European Union also fund the agro-pastoral mediation programme implemented by HD with the support of the Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • In Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger Situation Overview : Niger – Tillabéri and Tahoua Regions | March 2020
    Humanitarian situation monitoring (HSM) in Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger Situation overview : Niger – Tillabéri and Tahoua regions | March 2020 Context Since the outbreak of violence in Mali in 2012, the border area between Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso has been characterized by a climate of insecurity due to the presence of armed groups, crime and rising tensions between communities1. The security situation in Niger has deteriorated sharply since 2018 and has caused the internal displacement of 159,028 people in the Tillabéri and Tahoua regions as of March 20202. In addition, the provision of humanitarian assistance is subject to multiple constraints resulting in limitations to access affected populations due to security, geographic and climatic factors, as well as to measures taken as part of the state of emergency covering parts of the Tillabéri and Tahoua regions1. Limited humanitarian access is one of the factors at the origin of important information gaps about the scope, nature and severity of needs. To fill these information gaps, REACH has been implementing a monitoring of the humanitarian situation, financed by the U.S. Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA) since January 2020, following a pilot phase in November 20193. This situation overview presents the main results for data collected in March 2020 in the Tillabéri and Tahoua regions and analyzes the development of main indicators in the Tillabéri region between November 2019 and March 20204. Methodology This assessment adopts a so-called “Area of knowledge” methodology. The aim of this methodology is to collect, analyze and share up-to-date information regarding multi-sectoral humanitarian needs in the region, including in areas that are difficult to access.
    [Show full text]
  • Niger SCP-II CE
    ÉVALUATION DE PROJET République du Niger Programme Spécial National phase II Evaluation terminale Novembre 2007 Via del Serafico, 107 - 00142 Rome, Italie Téléphone: +39 06 54592048 - Facsimile: +39 06 54593048 Courrier électronique: [email protected] Site web: www.ifad.org/evaluation A Document du Fonds International de Développement Agricole République du Niger Programme Spécial National Phase II (PSN-II) Evaluation terminale Novembre 2007 Rapport No. 1920-NE EQUIPE D ’EVALUATION Directeur, Bureau de l’évaluation M. Luciano Lavizzari Chargé d’évaluation M. Fabrizio Felloni Evaluateur associé M. Michael Carbon Chef de l’équipe M. Bernard Bonnet, Consultant Membres de l’équipe M. Boubacar Yamba, Consultant spécialiste en développement communautaire Mme Aichatou Nargoungou, Consultante spécialiste en micro-finance Photo de couverture: République du Niger Un comité de gestion de terroir pastoral à Ingal (Agadez) présente une carte des mouvements de troupeaux Photo: Bernard Bonnet République du Niger Programme Spécial National Phase II, Prêts No. 381-NE et SRS-46-NE Evaluation terminale Table des matières Abréviations et acronymes iii Cartes v Avant propos vii Foreword ix Résumé exécutif xi Executive Summary xix Accord conclusif xxv Agreement at Completion Point xxxi I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. Contexte du pays 1 B. Le projet 2 C. Objectifs de l’évaluation 5 II. PERFORMANCE DU PROJET 5 A. Conception du projet 5 B. Mise en œuvre et réalisations 9 C. Atteinte des objectifs du projet 18 D. Appréciation: pertinence, efficacité et efficience 21 E. Performance des partenaires 24 III. IMPACTS DU PROJET 27 A. Impacts sur la réduction de la pauvreté et des inégalités 27 B.
    [Show full text]
  • .Fifi...In.Waan»: , 31..-...31...1. .1...“ M
    .. 51.... .. PH . ...v 411 .. -. v.1. b... h. u a . a .ag....vww3.mw; i . t .. ... $1.ka , v1 L59! 1.355;. M...» n. a 6.... 1 :71 .L- .. v-3} - i... mwnfiwEmuw . firswmffiwur. E. L: .- , c .31.. 1 5.] 1.2.2.41. .w: w 1m...” .1. 11. a. m . , . L»... 5.5.... my"? 1%. .. .r. .5». I. ..p. HwN...».U-.h....1... {whwnnuflzfinfiwfl flaws... n...” ... .HWVWW you - .8.“ .g .9453. :1 . .YWMV . .. 3..w.1........1 4%....th . 3m...” .14“: .PnMvrlmH..., . - r ] .11 (Kglhfi‘. a... ,. 1 .. 1N. ’- .. 0.. u 0.13 . - .fifi.....in.wav. ‘.‘|:L~!- an»: . , .]0] 31..-... 31...... .1. .1...“ M. I”. n .5 5%..“ kumwlflb . .1 . 2.. r.» .. ... ..rtf. dr— ..... I.].Iou.v.. 3... n1 .1 .1. .1)": 419.0114 ”.14“- . .. .21.- .:..............1m§.d& he? .. 1.1..s..nh.r.,.... 9......uLx. .1 .Tshlui . , . .. .5] .-.. .Wmuw Nougat... 11. non. 5’47“: “-13.6 I ,ZIWWuu-N..- 2... - “than...” 2.....13 .93 1. ,. , . .. .3 Oi . fid n 4:... l Pa... .45»..E...+..L 5* human.» r .. n . .M. #142“. .53 Mo... "X. 5. wand, H ._ . I1..1..G..H.I.L. armeknfindvr . .L .1 . 7| 5 l O «O . AVILJIHAH. I.I u‘1 .. 1.17.. Iovr A. .1. b. 3. 1.. Ivnb rdulaulh .. .. If.» 5...... (at. o 1.1.11. .. a in']; :0]. an”: . .. (Lute... nu . 1 . , wd11xu1 b #7.... .. .uc iv.” ... .1 .. .. ”4.07.1.113: 4.111.121 bl. $1.. 1.). 1 .. W but...“ O..1ap.-av.0o.|h.51r c... .o.1ncOI11]]o. at: I 2.. .1. .1119... v1.11“... .. .. .d .autifi].
    [Show full text]
  • NIGER: Carte Administrative NIGER - Carte Administrative
    NIGER - Carte Administrative NIGER: Carte administrative Awbari (Ubari) Madrusah Légende DJANET Tajarhi /" Capital Illizi Murzuq L I B Y E !. Chef lieu de région ! Chef lieu de département Frontières Route Principale Adrar Route secondaire A L G É R I E Fleuve Niger Tamanghasset Lit du lac Tchad Régions Agadez Timbuktu Borkou-Ennedi-Tibesti Diffa BARDAI-ZOUGRA(MIL) Dosso Maradi Niamey ZOUAR TESSALIT Tahoua Assamaka Tillabery Zinder IN GUEZZAM Kidal IFEROUANE DIRKOU ARLIT ! BILMA ! Timbuktu KIDAL GOUGARAM FACHI DANNAT TIMIA M A L I 0 100 200 300 kms TABELOT TCHIROZERINE N I G E R ! Map Doc Name: AGADEZ OCHA_SitMap_Niger !. GLIDE Number: 16032013 TASSARA INGALL Creation Date: 31 Août 2013 Projection/Datum: GCS/WGS 84 Gao Web Resources: www.unocha..org/niger GAO Nominal Scale at A3 paper size: 1: 5 000 000 TILLIA TCHINTABARADEN MENAKA ! Map data source(s): Timbuktu TAMAYA RENACOM, ARC, OCHA Niger ADARBISNAT ABALAK Disclaimers: KAOU ! TENIHIYA The designations employed and the presentation of material AKOUBOUNOU N'GOURTI I T C H A D on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion BERMO INATES TAKANAMATAFFALABARMOU TASKER whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations BANIBANGOU AZEY GADABEDJI TANOUT concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area ABALA MAIDAGI TAHOUA Mopti ! or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its YATAKALA SANAM TEBARAM !. Kanem WANZERBE AYOROU BAMBAYE KEITA MANGAIZE KALFO!U AZAGORGOULA TAMBAO DOLBEL BAGAROUA TABOTAKI TARKA BANKILARE DESSA DAKORO TAGRISS OLLELEWA
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Flood Risk Preliminary Mapping in Niamey, Niger33
    Maurizio Tiepolo31 and Sarah Braccio32 12 Flood Risk Preliminary Mapping in Niamey, Niger33 Abstract: Flood mapping is still rare in the large cities South of Sahara. The lack of information on the characteristics of floods, the orography of the sites and the recep- tors hampers its production. However, even with scant information, it is possible to create preliminary risk mapping. This tool can be used by local administrations in decision making on emergency plans or on climate change (CC) action plans. From 2010 onwards, the River Niger at Niamey (1.1 million inhabitants, 123 km2 in 2014) swelled at unseasonal times. This new river flood pattern can be linked to CC. Each flooding event affected thousands of people and homes. The steady development of areas that did not appear to be flood prone in the past is the main cause of these impacts. These areas require special measures if further impact is to be avoided in the future. This chapter presents the preliminary flood risk map of Niamey 1:20,000. The map was built up using an historic approach (flooded area derived from satellite images) and considering risk (R) as the result of hazard (H) and damage (D), R = H * D. Risk was measured according to two scenarios: medium and high probability of flooding. The inverse of the return period of river and pluvial flooding (H) and the potential damage to buildings and crops according the water depth were used. Infor- mation to measure risk components was sourced by daily rainfall and daily discharge of the River Niger from 1946 to 2014, and from high-resolution satellite images (2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Bulletin on Outbreaks
    WEEKLY BULLETIN ON OUTBREAKS AND OTHER EMERGENCIES Week 14: 29 March to 4 April 2021 Data as reported by: 17:00; 4 April 2021 REGIONAL OFFICE FOR Africa WHO Health Emergencies Programme 0 116 103 13 New event Ongoing events Outbreaks Humanitarian crises 117 622 3 105 Algeria ¤ 36 13 110 0 5 420 164 Mauritania 7 2 10 501 392 110 0 7 0 Niger 17 927 449 Mali 3 334 10 567 0 6 0 2 079 4 4 595 165 Eritrea Cape Verde 38 520 1 037 Chad Senegal 4 918 185 59 0 Gambia 27 0 3 0 17 125 159 9 761 45 Guinea-Bissau 796 17 7 0 Burkina Faso 225 46 215 189 2 963 0 162 593 2 048 Guinea 12 817 150 12 38 397 1 3 662 66 1 1 23 12 Benin 30 0 Nigeria 1 873 71 0 Ethiopia 420 14 481 5 6 188 15 Sierra Leone Togo 3 473 296 53 920 779 52 14 Ghana 5 245 72 Côte d'Ivoire 10 098 108 14 484 479 63 0 40 0 Liberia 17 0 South Sudan Central African Republic 916 2 45 0 25 0 19 670 120 43 180 237 90 287 740 Cameroon 7 0 28 676 137 5 330 13 138 988 2 224 1 952 87 655 2 51 22 43 0 112 12 6 1 488 6 3 988 79 11 187 6 902 102 Equatorial Guinea Uganda 542 8 Sao Tome and Principe 32 11 2 042 85 41 016 335 Kenya Legend 7 100 90 Gabon Congo 18 504 301 Rwanda Humanitarian crisis 2 212 34 22 482 311 Measles 18 777 111 Democratic Republic of the Congo 9 681 135 Burundi 2 964 6 Monkeypox Ebola virus disease Seychelles 27 930 739 1 525 0 420 29 United Republic of Tanzania Lassa fever Skin disease of unknown etiology 189 0 4 084 20 509 21 Cholera Yellow fever 1 349 5 6 257 229 22 631 542 cVDPV2 Dengue fever 88 930 1 220 Comoros Angola Malawi COVID-19 Chikungunya 33 661 1 123 862 0 3 719 146
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport Sur Les Indicateurs De L'eau Et De L'assainissement
    REPUBLIQUE DU NIGER ----------------------------------------- FRATERNITE – TRAVAIL - PROGRES ------------------------------------------- MINISTERE DE L’HYDRAULIQUE ET DE L’ASSAINISSEMENT ---------------------------------------- COMITE TECHNIQUE PERMANENT DE VALIDATION DES INDICATEURS DE L’EAU ET DE L’ASSAINISSEMENT RAPPORT SUR LES INDICATEURS DE L’EAU ET L'ASSAINISSEMENT POUR L’ANNEE 2016 Mai 2017 Table des matières LISTE DES SIGLES ET ACRONYMES I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 II. DEFINITIONS ..................................................................................................................... 1 2.1. Définitions de quelques concepts et notions dans le domaine de l’hydraulique Rurale et Urbaine. ................................................................................................................ 1 2.2. Rappel des innovations adoptées en 2011 ................................................................... 2 2.3. Définitions des indicateurs de performance calculés dans le domaine de l’approvisionnement en eau potable ................................................................................... 3 2.4. Définitions des indicateurs de performance calculés dans le domaine de l’assainissement .................................................................................................................... 4 III. LES INDICATEURS DES SOUS – PROGRAMMES DU PROSEHA .......................... 4 IV. CONTRAINTES ET PROBLEMES
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution Des Femmes Aux Dépenses Des Ménages Et À La Réduction De La Pauvreté À Maradi
    REPUBLIQUE DU NIGER Fraternité- Travail- Progrès MINISTERE DES FINANCES INSTITUT NATIONAL DE LA STATISTIQUE Etablissement Public à Caractère Administratif OBSERVATOIRE NATIONAL DE LA PAUVRETE ET DU DEVELOPPEMENT HUMAIN DURABLE (ONAPAD) Contribution des femmes aux dépenses des ménages et à la réduction de la pauvreté à Maradi Etude réalisée dans le cadre du Programme Conjoint Maradi du Système des Nations Unies au Niger Novembre 2012 LISTE DES TABLEAUX ....................................................................................................... II LISTE DES GRAPHIQUES ET FIGURES ....................................................................... III LISTE DES ACRONYMES ................................................................................................... V INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPITRE 1 : PRESENTATION DE LA REGION DE MARADI .................................. 4 1.1. LES CARACTERISTIQUES PHYSIQUES ET NATURELLES ................................................... 4 1.1.1 Les caractéristiques physiques. ............................................................................... 4 1.1.2. Les caractéristiques naturelles ................................................................................. 4 1.2 SITUATION ECONOMIQUE ET SOCIALE ........................................................................... 6 1.2.1 Les caractéristiques sociales ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Bulletin on Outbreaks and Other Emergencies
    WEEKLY BULLETIN ON OUTBREAKS AND OTHER EMERGENCIES Week 51: 14 - 20 December 2020 Data as reported by: 17:00; 20 December 2020 REGIONAL OFFICE FOR Africa WHO Health Emergencies Programme 0 118 105 13 New event Ongoing events Outbreaks Humanitarian crises 95 203 2 666 Algeria ¤ 36 13 Mauritania 795 2 3 788 123 6 191 222 7 2 102 0 7 0 Niger 10 971 225 Mali 754 0 567 0 6 0 Eritrea Cape Verde 2 079 4 1 890 102Chad 17 758 365 Senegal 2 361 82 166 1 Gambia 49 0 1 0 3 0 11 579 111 8 702 42 Guinea-Bissau 450 16 Burkina Faso 1 177 241 119 951 1 853 78 434 1 221 Guinea 5 160 76 10 0 38 386 1 2 447 44 1 1 Benin 30 0 Nigeria Ethiopia 1 873 30 0 412 5 Sierra Leone Togo 420 14 972 17 6 053 14 Ghana 198 5 25 849 448 4 938 63 52 14 Côte d'Ivoire 3 228 62 South Sudan 14 728 257 Liberia 17 0 58 0 Central African Republic 35 0 916 2 29 0 Cameroon 25 0 13 545 80 21 918 331 53 653 327 7 0 28 676 137 1 868 13 94 500 1 639 1 952 87 626 2 51 22 879 3 66 130 55 1 488 6 2 497 75 3 396 5 214 85 Equatorial Guinea Uganda 3 1 305 7 Sao Tome and Principe Kenya 1 788 83 31 187 231 Legend 58 2 3 167 44 Gabon Congo 711 13 18 504 301 Rwanda Humanitarian crisis 1 012 17 9 400 64 Democratic Republic of the Congo 7 232 59 Measles Burundi 6 200 100 762 2 Monkeypox Skin disease of unknown etiology Seychelles 15 211 369 989 0 124 17 United Republic of Tanzania Lassa fever Yellow fever 178 0 202 0 509 21 Cholera Dengue fever 1 349 5 6 231 203 16 644 387 cVDPV2 Chikungunya 18 716 373 Comoros Angola Malawi COVID-19 Leishmaniasis 6 161 187 862 0 643 7 Zambia 133 0 Mozambique Anthrax
    [Show full text]