Egg Database Bibliography

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Egg Database Bibliography Egg Database Bibliography Samuel H. Church1;∗;y, Seth Donoughe1;2;∗, Bruno A. S. de Medeiros1, Cassandra G. Extavour1;3;y Note: This document is a list of the 1,756 published sources that were used to generate the assembled dataset of insect egg traits. ‘Diss.’ indicates a PhD dissertation, whereas ‘MA thesis’ indicates a Master’s thesis. For more information on the dataset, please see Church et al. 2018: “A database of egg size and shape from more than 6,700 insect species” (preprint). It describes the criteria that were used to include sources, definitions of each trait, and details on the procedure that was used to collect data from each source. References Abbassy, M. M., N. Helmy, M. Osman, S. E. Cope, and S. M. Presley. “Embryogenesis of the sand fly Phlebotomus pa- patasi (Diptera: Psychodidae): cell cleavage, blastoderm formation, and gastrulation”. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 88.6 (1995): 809–814. Abdel-Razak, S. I., S. M. Beshr, A. K. Mourad, and K. S. Moursi. “Ultrastructure of egg shell of four different Coccoidea species in Egypt”. Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences 73.3 (2007): 521– 527. Abdurahiman, U. C. and K. J. Joseph. “Observations on the biology and behaviour of Ceratosolen marchali Mayr (Agaonidae, Chalcidoidea, Hymenoptera)”. Entomon 1.2 (1976): 115–122. Abraham, Y. J., D. Moore, and G. Godwin. “Rearing and aspects of biology of Cephalonomia stephanoderis and Prorops nasuta (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) parasitoids of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)”. Bulletin of Entomological Research 80.2 (1990): 121–128. Adamski, D., J. R. Makinson, B. T. Brown, S. A. Wright, P. D. Prattand, and J. W. Brown. “Description and evaluation of Metharmostis multilineata (Cosmopterigidae) and Idiophantis soreuta (Gelechiidae) (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea) For biocontrol of downy rose myrtle, Rhodomyrtus tomentosa (Myrtaceae)”. The Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 67.2 (2013): 111–127. Adidharma, D. and Y. D. Ciptadi. “Biology of Trissolcus latisulcus Crawford (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), an egg parasitoid of Chrysocoris javanus Westw (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae)”. Agrivita 34.3 (2012): 262–296. Ahmad, A. “The eggshell morphology of Rallicola unguiculatus Piaget, 1880 (Ischnocera: Phthiraptera)”. Journal of Parasitic Diseases 41.2 (2017): 562–564. Ahmad, A., G. Arya, N. Bansal, and A. K. Saxena. “Stray notes on two phthirapteran species occurring on Indian grey Horn Bill, Tockus birostris Scopoli (Coraciformes: Bucerotidae)”. Journal of Parasitic Diseases 39.4 (2015): 761–765. Ahmad, A., V. Khan, S. Badola, G. Arya, N. Bansal, and A. K. Saxena. “Population characteristics and the nature of egg shells of two Phthirapteran species parasitizing Indian cattle egrets”. Journal of Insect Science 10 (2010): 1–7. Aiello, A. “Life history of Dysodia ska (Lepidoptera: Thyrididae) in Panama”. Psyche 87.1-2 (1980): 121–130. ∗ Samuel H. Church and Seth Donoughe contributed equally to this work. 1 Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States 2 Current address: Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States 3 Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States y Correspondence to [email protected] and [email protected] Church et al. 2018 – Insect egg size and shape evolve with ecology, not developmental rate page 2 of 85 Aiello, A. and M. Balcazar-lara. “The immature stages of Oxytenis modestia with comments of the larvae of Asthenidia and Homoeopteryx (Saturniidae: Oxyteninae)”. Journal of The Lepidopterists’ Society 51.1-1 (1997): 105–118. Aiken, R. B. “Effects of temperature on incubation times and mortality rates of eggs of Dytiscus alaskanus (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae)”. Ecography 9.2 (1986): 133–136. Aina, J. O. “The life history of Riptortus dentipes F.(Alydidae, Heteroptera) a pest of growing cowpea pods”. Journal of Natural History 9.5 (1975): 589–596. Aitken, A. D. “A strain of small Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.) (Coleoptera, Silvanidae) from the Far East”. Journal of Stored Products Research 2.1 (1966): 45–55. Ajidagba, P. O. A. “Embryonic development of the stable fly, Stomoxys calcitrans Linnaeus (Diptera: Muscidae): a light and electron microscopy study”. MA thesis. Kansas State University, 1979. Ajidagba, P., C. W. Pitts, and D. E. Bay. “Early embryogenesis in the stable fly (Diptera: Muscidae)”. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 76.4 (1983): 616–623. Al Bitar, L., S. N. Gorb, C. P. W. Zebitz, and D. Voigt. “Egg adhesion of the codling moth Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) to various substrates: II. Fruit surfaces of different apple cultivars”. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 6.3 (2014): 471–488. Alba-Tercedor, J. and M. El Alami. “Description of the nymphs and eggs of Acentrella almohades sp. n. from Morocco and Southern Spain (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae)”. Aquatic Insects 21.4 (1999): 241–247. Alexander, B. and J. G. Rozen Jr. “Ovaries, ovarioles, and oocytes in parasitic bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)”. The Pan-Pacific Entomologist 63.2 (1987): 155–164. Alford, D. V. “The biology and immature stages of Syntretus splendidus (Marshall) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Euphorinae), a parasite of adult bumblebees”. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 120.17 (1968): 375–393. Allsopp, P. G. “Identification of false wireworms (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) from southern Queensland and northern New South Wales”. Australian Journal of Entomology 18.3 (1980): 277–286. Allsopp, P. G. and L. N. Robertson. “Biology, ecology and control of soldier flies Inopus spp (Diptera, Stratiomyidae) - a review”. Australian Journal of Zoology 36.6 (1988): 627–648. Almeida, F., L. Suesdek, M. T. Motoki, E. S. Bergo, and M. A. M. Sallum. “Morphometric comparisons of the scanning electron micrographs of the eggs of Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) darlingi Root (Diptera: Culicidae)”. Acta Tropica 139 (2014): 115–122. Altahtawy, M. M., S. M. El‐Sawaf, and F. F. Shalaby. “Studies on morphology and development of the immature stages of Microplitis rufiventris Kokujev (Hym., Bracon.)” Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 71.1‐4 (1972): 134–140. Altson, A. M. “On the method of oviposition and the egg of Lyctus brunneus, Steph.” Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology 35.234 (1923): 217–227. Alves-dos-Santos, I., G. A. R. Melo, and J. G. Rozen Jr. “Biology and immature stages of the bee tribe Tetrapediini (Hymenoptera: Apidae)”. American Museum Novitates 3377 (2002): 1–45. Amos, W. B. and G. Salt. “An atlas of the development of eggs of an ichneumon wasp”. Journal of Entomology Series B, Taxonomy 43.1 (1974): 11–18. Amy, R. L. “The embryology of Habrobracon juglandis (Ashmead)”. Journal of Morphology 109.2 (1961): 199–217. Andaur-Arenas, D. and T. S. Olivares. “Ultraestructura de huevos en cinco especies de macrolepidópteros con una clave de los huevos de Copitarsia Hampson (Lepidoptera, Ditrysia)”. Agrociencia 43.1 (2009): 49–59. Anderson, D. T. “The embryology of Dacus tryoni (Frogg.)[Diptera, Trypetidae (= Tephritidae)], the queensland fruit-fly”. Development 10.3 (1962): 248–292. Anderson, D. T. and C. Lawson-Kerr. “The embryonic development of the marine caddis fly, Philanisus plebeius Walker (Trichoptera: Chathamidae)”. The Biological Bulletin 153.1 (1977): 98–105. Anderson, J. M. E. “Aquatic Hydrophilidae (Coleoptera). The biology of some Australian species with descriptions of immature stages reared in the laboratory”. Australian Journal of Entomology 15.2 (1976): 219–228. Church et al. 2018 – Insect egg size and shape evolve with ecology, not developmental rate page 3 of 85 Anderson, N. H. and J. R. Bourne. “Bionomics of three species of glossosomatid caddis flies (Trichoptera: Glossoso- matidae) in Oregon”. Canadian Journal of Zoology 52.3 (1974): 405–411. Ando, H., R. Machida, and T. Nagashima. “Cleavage of the jumping bristletail, Pedetontus unimaculatus Machida: Hexapoda, Microcoryphia, Machilidae”. Bulletin of Seisen Women’s Junior College 8-9 (1990): 197–202. Ando, H. “Old oocytes and newly laid eggs of scorpion-flies and hanging-flies (Mecoptera: Panorpidae and Bittaci- dae)”. Science Reports of the Tokyo Kyoiku Daigaku 15 (1973): 163–187. Ando, H. and H. Kobayashi. “Description of early and middle developmental stages in embryos of the firefly, Luciola cruciata Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Lampyridae)”. Sugadaira Kogen Biological Laboratory Research Report 7 (1975): 1–11. Ando, H. and R. Machida. “Relationship between Notoptera and Dermaptera, from the embryological standpoint”. Recent Advances in Insect Embryology in Japan and Poland. Tsukuba: Arthropodan Embryological Society of Japan, 1987. 151–157. Ando, H. and J. Okada. “Embryology of the butterbur stem sawfly Aglaeostigma occipitosa (Malaise) as studied by external observation (Tenthredinidae, Hymenoptera)”. Acta Hymenopterologica 1 (1958): 55–62. Ando, H. and M. Tanaka. “The formation of germ rudiment and embryonic membranes in the primitive moth, Endoclita excrescens Butler (Hepialidae, Monotrysia, Lepidoptera) and its phylogenetic significance”. Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology 12 (1976): 52–55. Ando, H. and M. Tanaka. “Early embryonic development of the primitive moths, Endoclyta signifer Walker and E. excrescens Butler (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae)”. International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology 9.1 (1980): 67–77. Ando, Y.“Structure of the chorion in the false melon
Recommended publications
  • 1 1 DNA Barcodes Reveal Deeply Neglected Diversity and Numerous
    Page 1 of 57 1 DNA barcodes reveal deeply neglected diversity and numerous invasions of micromoths in 2 Madagascar 3 4 5 Carlos Lopez-Vaamonde1,2, Lucas Sire2, Bruno Rasmussen2, Rodolphe Rougerie3, 6 Christian Wieser4, Allaoui Ahamadi Allaoui 5, Joël Minet3, Jeremy R. deWaard6, Thibaud 7 Decaëns7, David C. Lees8 8 9 1 INRA, UR633, Zoologie Forestière, F- 45075 Orléans, France. 10 2 Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte, UMR 7261 CNRS Université de Tours, UFR 11 Sciences et Techniques, Tours, France. 12 3Institut de Systématique Evolution Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, 13 CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 50, 75005 Paris, France. 14 4 Landesmuseum für Kärnten, Abteilung Zoologie, Museumgasse 2, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria 15 5 Department of Entomology, University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar 16 6 Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E., Guelph, ON 17 N1G2W1, Canada 18 7Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS–Université de Genome Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIV GUELPH on 10/03/18 19 Montpellier–Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier–EPHE), 1919 Route de Mende, F-34293 20 Montpellier, France. 21 8Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, SW7 5BD, UK. 22 23 24 Email for correspondence: [email protected] For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from final official version of record. 1 Page 2 of 57 25 26 Abstract 27 Madagascar is a prime evolutionary hotspot globally, but its unique biodiversity is under threat, 28 essentially from anthropogenic disturbance.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcodes Reveal Deeply Neglected Diversity and Numerous Invasions of Micromoths in Madagascar
    Genome DNA barcodes reveal deeply neglected diversity and numerous invasions of micromoths in Madagascar Journal: Genome Manuscript ID gen-2018-0065.R2 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 17-Jul-2018 Author: Complete List of Authors: Lopez-Vaamonde, Carlos; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), ; Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte (IRBI), Sire, Lucas; Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte Rasmussen,Draft Bruno; Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte Rougerie, Rodolphe; Institut Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Wieser, Christian; Landesmuseum für Kärnten Ahamadi, Allaoui; University of Antananarivo, Department Entomology Minet, Joël; Institut de Systematique Evolution Biodiversite deWaard, Jeremy; Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Decaëns, Thibaud; Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS–Université de Montpellier–Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier–EPHE), , CEFE UMR 5175 CNRS Lees, David; Natural History Museum London Keyword: Africa, invasive alien species, Lepidoptera, Malaise trap, plant pests Is the invited manuscript for consideration in a Special 7th International Barcode of Life Issue? : https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/genome-pubs Page 1 of 57 Genome 1 DNA barcodes reveal deeply neglected diversity and numerous invasions of micromoths in 2 Madagascar 3 4 5 Carlos Lopez-Vaamonde1,2, Lucas Sire2, Bruno Rasmussen2, Rodolphe Rougerie3, 6 Christian Wieser4, Allaoui Ahamadi Allaoui 5, Joël Minet3, Jeremy R. deWaard6, Thibaud 7 Decaëns7, David C. Lees8 8 9 1 INRA, UR633, Zoologie Forestière, F- 45075 Orléans, France. 10 2 Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte, UMR 7261 CNRS Université de Tours, UFR 11 Sciences et Techniques, Tours, France.
    [Show full text]
  • A Major Locus Controls a Biologically Active Pheromone Component in Heliconius Melpomene
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/739037; this version posted August 19, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 A major locus controls a biologically active pheromone component in Heliconius melpomene 2 Kelsey J.R.P. Byers1,2,9, Kathy Darragh1,2,9, Jamie Musgrove2, Diana Abondano Almeida2,3, Sylvia Fernanda 3 Garza2,4, Ian A. Warren1, Pasi Rastas5, Marek Kucka6, Yingguang Frank Chan6, Richard M. Merrill7, Stefan 4 Schulz8, W. Owen McMillan2, Chris D. Jiggins1,2,10 5 6 1 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom 7 2 Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama, Panama 8 3 Present address: Institute for Ecology, Evolution and Diversity, Goethe Universität, Frankfurt, Germany 9 4 Present address: Department of Collective Behaviour, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behaviour, 10 Konstanz, Germany & Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, 11 Konstanz, Germany 12 5 Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland 13 6 Friedrich Miescher Laboratory of the Max Planck Society, Tuebingen, Germany 14 7 Division of Evolutionary Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany 15 8 Institute of Organic Chemistry, Department of Life Sciences, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 16 Braunschweig, Germany 17 9 These authors contributed equally to this work 18 10 To whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected] 19 Running title: Genetics of bioactive pheromones in Heliconius 20 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/739037; this version posted August 19, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Micro-Moth Grading Guidelines (Scotland) Abhnumber Code
    Micro-moth Grading Guidelines (Scotland) Scottish Adult Mine Case ABHNumber Code Species Vernacular List Grade Grade Grade Comment 1.001 1 Micropterix tunbergella 1 1.002 2 Micropterix mansuetella Yes 1 1.003 3 Micropterix aureatella Yes 1 1.004 4 Micropterix aruncella Yes 2 1.005 5 Micropterix calthella Yes 2 2.001 6 Dyseriocrania subpurpurella Yes 2 A Confusion with fly mines 2.002 7 Paracrania chrysolepidella 3 A 2.003 8 Eriocrania unimaculella Yes 2 R Easier if larva present 2.004 9 Eriocrania sparrmannella Yes 2 A 2.005 10 Eriocrania salopiella Yes 2 R Easier if larva present 2.006 11 Eriocrania cicatricella Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 2.007 13 Eriocrania semipurpurella Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 2.008 12 Eriocrania sangii Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 4.001 118 Enteucha acetosae 0 A 4.002 116 Stigmella lapponica 0 L 4.003 117 Stigmella confusella 0 L 4.004 90 Stigmella tiliae 0 A 4.005 110 Stigmella betulicola 0 L 4.006 113 Stigmella sakhalinella 0 L 4.007 112 Stigmella luteella 0 L 4.008 114 Stigmella glutinosae 0 L Examination of larva essential 4.009 115 Stigmella alnetella 0 L Examination of larva essential 4.010 111 Stigmella microtheriella Yes 0 L 4.011 109 Stigmella prunetorum 0 L 4.012 102 Stigmella aceris 0 A 4.013 97 Stigmella malella Apple Pigmy 0 L 4.014 98 Stigmella catharticella 0 A 4.015 92 Stigmella anomalella Rose Leaf Miner 0 L 4.016 94 Stigmella spinosissimae 0 R 4.017 93 Stigmella centifoliella 0 R 4.018 80 Stigmella ulmivora 0 L Exit-hole must be shown or larval colour 4.019 95 Stigmella viscerella
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera on the Introduced Robinia Pseudoacacia in Slovakia, Central Europe
    Check List 8(4): 709–711, 2012 © 2012 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution Lepidoptera on the introduced Robinia pseudoacacia in PECIES S OF ISTS L Slovakia, Central Europe Miroslav Kulfan E-mail: [email protected] Comenius University, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Ecology, Mlynská dolina B-1, SK-84215 Bratislava, Slovakia. Abstract: Robinia pseudoacacia A current checklist of Lepidoptera that utilize as a hostplant in Slovakia (Central Europe) faunalis provided. community. The inventory Two monophagous is based on species, a bibliographic the leaf reviewminers andMacrosaccus new unreported robiniella data and from Parectopa southwest robiniella Slovakia., and Thethe polyphagouslist includes 35pest Lepidoptera Hyphantria species cunea belonging to 10 families. Most species are polyphagous and belong to Euro-Siberian have subsequently been introduced to Slovakia. Introduction E. The area is a polygon enclosed by the towns of Bratislava, Robinia pseudoacacia a widespread species in its native habitat in southeastern North America. It was L.introduced (black locust, to orEurope false acacia),in 1601 is Komárno, Veľký Krtíš and Myjava. Ten plots were located in the southern part of the study area. Most were located in theThe remnant trophic ofgroups the original of the floodplain Lepidoptera forests larvae that found were (Chapman 1935). The first mention of planting the species distributed along the Danube and Morava rivers. (Keresztesiin Slovakia dates 1965). from Today, 1750, itwhen is widespread black locust wasthroughout planted (1986). The zoogeographical distribution of the species western,around the central, fortress eastern in Komárno and southern in southern Europe, Slovakia where followswere defined the arrangement following the give system by Reiprichof Brown (2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropods and Other Biota Associated with the Azorean Trees and Shrubs: Juniperus Brevifolia
    Arquipelago - Life and Marine Sciences ISSN: 0873-4704 Arthropods and other Biota associated with the Azorean Trees and Shrubs: Juniperus brevifolia RUI NUNES, R. GABRIEL, R.B. ELIAS, F. RIGAL, A.O. SOARES, P. CARDOSO & P.A.V. BORGES Nunes, R., R. Gabriel, R.B. Elias, F. Rigal, A.O. Soares, P. Cardoso & P.A.V. Borges 2015. Arthropods and other Biota associated with the Azorean Trees and Shrubs: Juniperus brevifolia. Arquipelago. Life and Marine Sciences 32: 19-48. Appendix I-IV. This work aims to characterize the arthropods and other biota (lichens, bryophytes, vascular plants and birds) associated with the Azorean endemic tree, Juniperus brevifolia. This is the first of a series of publications that will (i) provide a comprehensive list of all the biota associated with the main Azorean endemic trees and shrubs, (ii) describe in detail the diver- sity, abundance and spatial patterns of canopy arthropods, and (iii) whenever possible, to extend biodiversity assessments to communities of bryophytes, lichens, vascular plants and vertebrates. We use standardized sampled data from BALA project for canopy arthropods and for the remaining taxa we surveyed literature data and the Herbarium of University of Azores. Juniperus brevifolia occurs in a wide range of elevation belts in Azores and accommodates a remarkable large number of taxa: besides canopy arthropods (161 species) it is also an important substrate to other vascular species (six species), bryophytes (105 spe- cies), lichens (106 species) and also birds (four species). In addition, the species richness and particularly the abundance of endemics are dominant, and the number of conservation concern species for bryophytes is noteworthy (30 out of 70).
    [Show full text]
  • GIS Handbook Appendices
    Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Appendix D Cooperating Agency Codes The following table lists the aerial survey cooperating agencies and codes to be used in the agency1, agency2, agency3 fields of the flown/not flown coverages. The contents of this list is available in digital form (.dbf) at the following website: http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/publications/id/id_guidelines.html 28 Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Code Agency Name AFC Alabama Forestry Commission ADNR Alaska Department of Natural Resources AZFH Arizona Forest Health Program, University of Arizona AZS Arizona State Land Department ARFC Arkansas Forestry Commission CDF California Department of Forestry CSFS Colorado State Forest Service CTAES Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station DEDA Delaware Department of Agriculture FDOF Florida Division of Forestry FTA Fort Apache Indian Reservation GFC Georgia Forestry Commission HOA Hopi Indian Reservation IDL Idaho Department of Lands INDNR Indiana Department of Natural Resources IADNR Iowa Department of Natural Resources KDF Kentucky Division of Forestry LDAF Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry MEFS Maine Forest Service MDDA Maryland Department of Agriculture MADCR Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation MIDNR Michigan Department of Natural Resources MNDNR Minnesota Department of Natural Resources MFC Mississippi Forestry Commission MODC Missouri Department of Conservation NAO Navajo Area Indian Reservation NDCNR Nevada Department of Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Bionomics of Bagworms (Lepidoptera: Psychidae)
    ANRV363-EN54-11 ARI 27 August 2008 20:44 V I E E W R S I E N C N A D V A Bionomics of Bagworms ∗ (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) Marc Rhainds,1 Donald R. Davis,2 and Peter W. Price3 1Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 47901; email: [email protected] 2Department of Entomology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C., 20013-7012; email: [email protected] 3Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, 86011-5640; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2009. 54:209–26 Key Words The Annual Review of Entomology is online at bottom-up effects, flightlessness, mating failure, parthenogeny, ento.annualreviews.org phylogenetic constraint hypothesis, protogyny This article’s doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.54.110807.090448 Abstract Copyright c 2009 by Annual Reviews. The bagworm family (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) includes approximately All rights reserved 1000 species, all of which complete larval development within a self- 0066-4170/09/0107-0209$20.00 enclosing bag. The family is remarkable in that female aptery occurs in ∗The U.S. Government has the right to retain a over half of the known species and within 9 of the 10 currently recog- nonexclusive, royalty-free license in and to any nized subfamilies. In the more derived subfamilies, several life-history copyright covering this paper. traits are associated with eruptive population dynamics, e.g., neoteny of females, high fecundity, dispersal on silken threads, and high level of polyphagy. Other salient features shared by many species include a short embryonic period, developmental synchrony, sexual segrega- tion of pupation sites, short longevity of adults, male-biased sex ratio, sexual dimorphism, protogyny, parthenogenesis, and oviposition in the pupal case.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera, Endromidae) in China
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 127: 29–42 (2011)The genusAndraca (Lepidoptera, Endromidae) in China... 29 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.127.928 RESEARCH artICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research The genus Andraca (Lepidoptera, Endromidae) in China with descriptions of a new species Xing Wang1,†, Ling Zeng2,‡, Min Wang2,§ 1 Department of Entomology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, P.R. China. Present address: Institute of Entomology, College of Biosafety Science and Technology, Hunan Agricul- tural University, Changsha 410128 Hunan, China; and Provincial Key Laboratory for Biology and Control of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China 2 Department of Entomology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, P.R. China † urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F8727887-0014-42D4-BA68-21B3009E8C7F ‡ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:7981BF0E-D1F8-43CA-A505-72DBBA140023 § urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:D683614E-1F58-4CA8-9D80-B23BD41947A2 Corresponding author: Ling Zeng ([email protected]) Academic editor: N. Wahlberg | Received 21 January 2011 | Accepted 15 August 2011 | Published 8 September 2011 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:33D4BBFB-4B7D-4BBC-B34C-17D2E7F99F67 Citation: Wang X, Zeng L, Wang M (2011) The genus Andraca (Lepidoptera, Endromidae) in China with descriptions of a new species. ZooKeys 127: 29–42. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.127.928 Abstract The six species of the genus Andraca Walker hitherto known from China are reviewed, and a new species, A. gongshanensis, sp. n., described from Yunnan Province, China. Adults and male genitalia of all exam- ined species are illustrated, together with a distributional map. A key to all seven Chinese Andraca species is provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Oviposition Preference and Olfactory Response of Diaphania Indica (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) to Volatiles of Uninfested and Infested Cucurbitaceous Host Plants
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGYENTOMOLOGY ISSN (online): 1802-8829 Eur. J. Entomol. 116: 392–401, 2019 http://www.eje.cz doi: 10.14411/eje.2019.040 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Oviposition preference and olfactory response of Diaphania indica (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) to volatiles of uninfested and infested cucurbitaceous host plants AMIN MOGHBELI GHARAEI 1, MAHDI ZIAADDINI 1, *, MOHAMMAD AMIN JALALI 1 and BRIGITTE FREROT 2 1 Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran; e-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2 INRA, UMR 1392, iEES Paris, Route de St Cyr, 78000 Versailles, France; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Lepidoptera, Pyralidae, Diaphania indica, cucumber moth, host volatiles, olfactory response, wind tunnel, oviposition, Cucurbitaceae, Citrullus lanatus, Cucumis melo, Cucumis sativus, Cucurbita pepo Abstract. The cucumber moth, Diaphania indica (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), is a major pest of cucurbitaceous plants. The oviposition preference and olfactory response of larvae, mated and unmated male and female adults to volatiles emanating from uninfested and infested plants of four species of cucurbitaceous host plants and odours of conspecifi cs were recorded. Also the role of experience in the host fi nding behaviour of D. indica was evaluated. The experiments were done using a wind tunnel, olfactometer attraction assays and oviposition bioassays. The results reveal that fewer eggs were laid on infested plants than on uninfested plants. Females signifi cantly preferred cucumber over squash, melon and watermelon. Cucurbitaceous plants elicited adults of D. indica to fl y upwind followed by landing on the plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Biology of Diaphania Indica (Lepidoptera : Pyralidae)
    J. Natn. Sci. Coun. Sri Lanka 1997 25(4): 203-209 ASPECTS OF THE BIOLOGY OF DIAPHANIA INDICA (LEPIDOPTERA : PYRALIDAE) G.A.S.M. GANEHIARACHCHI Department of Zoology, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya (Received: 19 January 1995;accepted: 5 September 1997) Abstract: Diaphan ia indica (Saunders)isamajor LepidopteranpestofCucurbits. Some aspects of the biology and natural enemiesofthis pest on snalre gourd were studied. Larvae of D. indica collected from snake gourd vines were reared in the laboratory. Females laid eggs two days after copulation. The average fecundity was observed to be 267 eggs. The incubation period at room temperature was 3- 5 days. The larval period was 8-10 days and pupal period 7-9days. Themaximum longevity of the adult moth was 9 days. Two species of Braconid endoparasites (E1asn~u.sindicus and Apanteles taragamne) and an unidentified Ichneumonid ectoparasite were fbund to parasitize larvae of D.irzdica in the field. Due to the high level of parasitism by Elasn~usindicus (58.5%),the damage by D. indica to snalre gourd was not severe during the study period. Key Words: Cucurbitaceae, Diaphania indica, pests, Pyralidae, snake gourd, vegetable pests. INTRODUCTION Diaplzania indica (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) known as pumpkin caterpillar, is one of the major pests of most Cucurbitaceae all over the w0r1d.l.~It was also reported to attack soya beans.Tost plant preference and seasonal fluctuation of this pest have also been st~died.~ In Sri Lanka, D. indica is one of the major pests of cucurbits some of which are economically important such as snake gourd (Triclzosantlzes anguina) and gherkins (Cucrsmis sativus) (M.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Moth Fauna in the West Bengal State University Campus: a Pictorial Catalogue
    International Journal of Zoology Studies International Journal of Zoology Studies ISSN: 2455-7269 Impact Factor: RJIF 5.14 www.zoologyjournals.com Volume 3; Issue 1; January 2018; Page No. 35-38 Diversity of moth fauna in the West Bengal state university campus: A pictorial catalogue Dr. Samir Kumar Saha Assistant Professor, Department of Zoology, West Bengal State University, Berunanpukuria, Malikapur, Kolkata, West Bengal, India Abstract An attempt has been taken to study the diversity of Moth fauna in West Bengal State University (WBSU) campus. A total of 30 genera were recorded under ten families from the study area from November 2017 to December, 2017. The family Erebidae with 12 genera followed by family Crambidae with 9 genera, family Noctuidae with 2 genera, rest of the family Arctiidae, Sphingidae, Pterophoridae, Uraniidae, Geometridae, Scythrididae and Stathmopodidae with 1 genus each were recorded inside campus area. As 30 different genera of moth recorded within a short span of time, it can be presumed to have a good diversity of moth species inside campus area. Keywords: moth, diversity, WBSU, West Bengal, India 1. Introduction Moth fauna. WBSU Campus is located in between 88° 25′ E Lepidoptera is one of the large order of insects that include longitudes and 44°46′ N latitude in the state of West Bengal, butterflies and moths and is probably one of the most suitable India (Fig. 1). groups for most quantitative comparisons between insect Photographs and observations were taken during the day light faunas to be valid, for the many reasons elaborated by hours. Individual images of Moths were photo-documented Holloway [1].
    [Show full text]