Bioblitz! OK 2019 - Cherokee County Moth List

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bioblitz! OK 2019 - Cherokee County Moth List BioBlitz! OK 2019 - Cherokee County Moth List Sort Family Species 00366 Tineidae Acrolophus mortipennella 00372 Tineidae Acrolophus plumifrontella Eastern Grass Tubeworm Moth 00373 Tineidae Acrolophus popeanella 00383 Tineidae Acrolophus texanella 00457 Psychidae Thyridopteryx ephemeraeformis Evergreen Bagworm Moth 01011 Oecophoridae Antaeotricha schlaegeri Schlaeger's Fruitworm 01014 Oecophoridae Antaeotricha leucillana 02047 Gelechiidae Keiferia lycopersicella Tomato Pinworm 02204 Gelechiidae Fascista cercerisella 02301.2 Gelechiidae Dichomeris isa 02401 Yponomeutidae Atteva aurea 02401 Yponomeutidae Atteva aurea Ailanthus Webworm Moth 02583 Sesiidae Synanthedon exitiosa 02691 Cossidae Fania nanus 02694 Cossidae Prionoxystus macmurtrei Little Carpenterworm Moth 02837 Tortricidae Olethreutes astrologana The Astrologer 03172 Tortricidae Epiblema strenuana 03202 Tortricidae Epiblema otiosana 03494 Tortricidae Cydia latiferreanus Filbert Worm 03573 Tortricidae Decodes basiplaganus 03632 Tortricidae Choristoneura fractittana 03635 Tortricidae Choristoneura rosaceana Oblique-banded Leafroller moth 03688 Tortricidae Clepsis peritana 03695 Tortricidae Sparganothis sulfureana Sparganothis Fruitworm Moth 03732 Tortricidae Platynota flavedana 03768.99 Tortricidae Cochylis ringsi 04639 Zygaenidae Pyromorpha dimidiata Orange-patched Smoky Moth 04644 Megalopygidae Lagoa crispata Black Waved Flannel Moth 04647 Megalopygidae Megalopyge opercularis 04665 Limacodidae Lithacodes fasciola 04677 Limacodidae Phobetron pithecium Hag Moth 04691 Limacodidae Monoleuca semifascia 04697 Limacodidae Euclea delphinii Spiny Oak Slug Moth 04699 Limacodidae Parasa indetermina Stinging Rose Caterpillar Moth 04748 Pyralidae Elophila icciusalis 04751 Pyralidae Elophila gyralis 04776 Pyralidae Petrophila hodgesi 04794 Pyralidae Eustixia pupula 04944 Pyralidae Crocidophora serratissimalis 04946 Pyralidae Ostrinia penitalis 04947 Pyralidae Ostrinia obumbratalis 04949 Pyralidae Ostrinia nubilalis 04953 Pyralidae Anania tertialis 04967 Pyralidae Hahncappsia mancalis 04975 Pyralidae Achyra rantalis 04975 Pyralidae Achyra rantalis Garden Webworm 04979 Pyralidae Neohelvibotys polingi 04991 Pyralidae Sericoplaga externalis 04992 Pyralidae Uresiphita reversalis 05034 Pyralidae Pyrausta signatalis 05051 Pyralidae Pyrausta rubicalis 05056 Pyralidae Pyrausta generosa 05069 Pyralidae Pyrausta tyralis 05071 Pyralidae Pyrausta acrionalis 05071 Pyralidae Pyrausta acrionalis Mint-loving Pyrausta Moth 05073 Pyralidae Pyrausta niveicilialis 05079 Pyralidae Udea rubigalis Page 1 of 7 Celery Leaftier Moth Rev. Sep. 7, 2019 BioBlitz! OK 2019 - Cherokee County Moth List Sort Family Species 05107 Pyralidae Lineodes integra 05142 Pyralidae Diacme elealis 05147 Pyralidae Epipagis huronalis 05156 Pyralidae Nomophila nearctica Lucerne Moth 05156.5 Pyralidae Duponchelia fovealis 05159 Pyralidae Desmia funeralis 05160 Pyralidae Desmia maculalis 05160 Pyralidae Desmia maculalis Grape Leaffolder Moth 05169 Pyralidae Hymenia perspectalis Spotted Beet Webworm Moth 05170 Pyralidae Spoladea recurvalis Hawaiian Beet Webworm Moth 05226 Pyralidae Palpita magniferalis 05228 Pyralidae Polygrammodes flavidalis 05241 Pyralidae Pantographa limata 05272 Pyralidae Herpetogramma bipunctalis Two-spotted Herpetogramma 05277 Pyralidae Herpetogramma thestealis 05280 Pyralidae Herpetogramma aeglealis 05355 Pyralidae Crambus praefectellus 05362 Pyralidae Crambus agitatellus Double-banded Grass-veneer 05420 Pyralidae Microcrambus elegans 05422 Pyralidae Microcrambus minor 05435 Pyralidae Fissicrambus mutabilis 05450 Pyralidae Parapediasia decorella 05451 Pyralidae Parapediasia teterrella 05454 Pyralidae Euchromius ocelleus 05460 Pyralidae Argyria nummulalis 05462 Pyralidae Argyria rufisignella 05464 Pyralidae Urola nivalis 05466 Pyralidae Vaxi critica 05482 Pyralidae Haimbachia squamulella 05491 Pyralidae Haimbachia diminutalis 05533 Pyralidae Hypsopygia olinalis 05568 Pyralidae Arta olivalis 05579 Pyralidae Epipaschia zelleri 05754.1 Pyralidae Pimodes caliginosus 05890 Pyralidae Adelphia petrella 05944 Pyralidae Homoeosoma deceptorum 06077 Thyrididae Psuedothyris sepulchralis Mournful Thyris 06271.1 Geometridae Mellila xanthometata Orange wing 06273 Geometridae Macaria pustularia Lesser Maple Spanworm Moth 06299 Geometridae Macaria coortaria Four Spotted Itame 06326 Geometridae Macaria aemulataria Common Angle 06331 Geometridae Macaria promiscuata Promiscuous Angle 06335 Geometridae Macaria aequiferaria 06335 Geometridae Macaria aequiferaria Woody Angle 06341 Geometridae Macaria bicolorata Bicolored Angle 06386 Geometridae Digrammia ocellinata 06420 Geometridae Fernaldella fimetaria 06439 Geometridae Hypomecis umbrosaria Umber Moth 06442 Geometridae Pimaphera sparsaria 06445 Geometridae Glena grisearia 06486 Geometridae Tornos scolopacinarius Dimorphic Gray 06586 Geometridae Iridopsis defectaria Brown shaded Gray 06590 Geometridae Anavitrinella pampinaria 06590 Geometridae Anavitrinella pampinaria Common Gray 06597 Geometridae Ectropis crepuscularia 06616 Geometridae Melanchroia chephise White-tipped Black Moth 06654 Geometridae Hypagyrtis unipunctataPage 2 of 7 Rev. Sep. 7, 2019 BioBlitz! OK 2019 - Cherokee County Moth List Sort Family Species 06654 Geometridae Hypagyrtis unipunctata One spotted Variant 06662 Geometridae Paleacrita vernata Spring Cankerworn Moth 06667 Geometridae Lomographa vestaliata 06667 Geometridae Lomographa vestaliata White Spring Moth 06704 Geometridae Erastria coloraria Broad lined Erastria 06705 Geometridae Erastria cruentaria Thin lined Erastria 06726 Geometridae Euchlaena obtusaria Obtuse Euchlaena 06729 Geometridae Euchlaena johnsonaria Johnson's Euchlaena 06735 Geometridae Euchlaena pectinaria Forked Euchlaena 06740 Geometridae Xanthotype urticaria 06740 Geometridae Xanthotype urticaria False Crocus Geometer 06753 Geometridae Pero honestaria Honest Pero 06797 Geometridae Ennomos magnaria Yellow-washed Metarranthis 06837 Geometridae Probole alienaria 06837.1 Geometridae Probole nyssaria 06837.1 Geometridae Probole nyssaria Dogwood Probole 06838 Geometridae Probole amicaria 06843 Geometridae Plagodis fervidaria Fervid Plagodis 06858 Geometridae Lychnosea intermicata 06941 Geometridae Eusarca confusaria 06941 Geometridae Eusarca confusaria Confused Eusarca 06974 Geometridae Patalene olyzonaria Juniper Geometer 06982 Geometridae Prochoerodes lineola Large Maple Spanworm Moth 07033 Geometridae Nemoria lixaria Red bordered Emerald 07053 Geometridae Dichorda iridaria Showy Emerald 07058 Geometridae Synchlora aerata Wavy lined Emerald 07059 Geometridae Synchlora frondaria Southern Emerald 07071 Geometridae Chlorochlamys chloroleucaria 07071 Geometridae Chlorochlamys chloroleucaria Blackberry Looper Moth 07094 Geometridae Lobocleta ossularia Drab Brown Wave 07100 Geometridae Lobocleta peralbata 07114 Geometridae Idaea demissaria 07114 Geometridae Idaea demissaria Red Bordered Wave 07136 Geometridae Cyclophora packardi 07146 Geometridae Haematopis grataria Chickweed Geometer 07147 Geometridae Timandra amaturaria Cross lined Wave 07159 Geometridae Scopula limboundata Large Lace Border 07179 Geometridae Leptostales rubromarginaria 07179 Geometridae Leptostales rubromarginaria Dark Ribboned Wave 07196 Geometridae Eulithis diversilineata Lesser Grapevine Looper Moth 07197 Geometridae Eulithis gracilineata Greater Grapevine Looper Moth 07414 Geometridae Orthonama obstipata The Gem 07416 Geometridae Costaconvexa centrostrigaria Bent line Carpet 07417 Geometridae Disclisioprocta stellata Somber Carpet 07440 Geometridae Eubaphe mendica The Beggar 07647 Geometridae Heterophleps triguttaria 07647 Geometridae Heterophleps triguttaria Three-spotted Fillip 07648 Geometridae Dyspteris abortivaria The Bad Wing 07665 Apatelodidae Olceclostera angelica The Angel 07685 Lasiocampidae Heteropacha rileyana Riley's Lappet Moth 07704 Saturniidae Eacles imperialis Imperial Moth 07706 Saturniidae Citheronia regalis Regal Moth 07709 Saturniidae Syssphinx bicolor Honey Locust Moth 07712 Saturniidae Syssphinx bisecta Bisected Honey Locust Moth 07715 Saturniidae Dryocampa rubicunda Rosy Maple Moth 07716 Saturniidae Anisota stigma Spiny Oakworm Moth 07723 Saturniidae Anisota virginiensis Page 3 of 7 Pink Striped Oakworm Moth Rev. Sep. 7, 2019 BioBlitz! OK 2019 - Cherokee County Moth List Sort Family Species 07746 Saturniidae Automeris io Io Moth 07757 Saturniidae Antheraea polyphemus Polyphemus Moth 07758 Saturniidae Actias luna Luna Moth 07764 Saturniidae Callosamia promethea 07767 Saturniidae Hyalophora cecropia Cecropia Moth 07771 Sphingidae Agrius cingulatus Pink Spotted Hawk Moth 07775 Sphingidae Manduca sexta Tobacco Hornworm 07776 Sphingidae Manduca quinquemaculata Five Spotted Hawk Moth 07778 Sphingidae Manduca rustica Rustic Sphinx 07787 Sphingidae Ceratomia undulosa Waved Sphinx 07789 Sphingidae Ceratomia catalpae Catalpa Sphinx 07793 Sphingidae Paratrea plebeja Plebian Sphinx 07821 Sphingidae Smerinthus jamaicensis Twin Spot Sphinx 07822 Sphingidae Smerinthus cerisyi One-eyed Sphinx 07824 Sphingidae Paonias excaecatus Blind Eyed Sphinx 07827 Sphingidae Amorpha juglandis Walnut Sphinx 07853 Sphingidae Hemaris thysbe Hummingbird Clearwing 07855 Sphingidae Hemaris diffinis Snowberry Clearwing 07859 Sphingidae Eumorpha pandorus Pandora Sphinx 07871 Sphingidae Deidamia inscriptum Lettered Sphinx 07873 Sphingidae Amphion floridensis Nessus Sphinx 07885 Sphingidae Darapsa myron Grapevine Sphinx 07890 Sphingidae Xylophanes tersa Tersa Sphinx 07894 Sphingidae Hyles lineata White Lined Sphinx 07903 Notodontidae
Recommended publications
  • Self-Repair and Self-Cleaning of the Lepidopteran Proboscis
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Dissertations Dissertations 8-2019 Self-Repair and Self-Cleaning of the Lepidopteran Proboscis Suellen Floyd Pometto Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations Recommended Citation Pometto, Suellen Floyd, "Self-Repair and Self-Cleaning of the Lepidopteran Proboscis" (2019). All Dissertations. 2452. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/2452 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SELF-REPAIR AND SELF-CLEANING OF THE LEPIDOPTERAN PROBOSCIS A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy ENTOMOLOGY by Suellen Floyd Pometto August 2019 Accepted by: Dr. Peter H. Adler, Major Advisor and Committee Co-Chair Dr. Eric Benson, Committee Co-Chair Dr. Richard Blob Dr. Patrick Gerard i ABSTRACT The proboscis of butterflies and moths is a key innovation contributing to the high diversity of the order Lepidoptera. In addition to taking nectar from angiosperm sources, many species take up fluids from overripe or sound fruit, plant sap, animal dung, and moist soil. The proboscis is assembled after eclosion of the adult from the pupa by linking together two elongate galeae to form one tube with a single food canal. How do lepidopterans maintain the integrity and function of the proboscis while foraging from various substrates? The research questions included whether lepidopteran species are capable of total self- repair, how widespread the capability of self-repair is within the order, and whether the repaired proboscis is functional.
    [Show full text]
  • The Adaptive Function of Tiger Moth Clicks Against Echolocating Bats: an Experimental and Synthetic Approach
    2811 The Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 2811 Published by The Company of Biologists 2006 doi:10.1242/jeb.02367 Corrigendum Ratcliffe, J. M. and Fullard, J. H. (2005). The adaptive function of tiger moth clicks against echolocating bats: an experimental and synthetic approach. J. Exp. Biol. 208, 4689-4698 There was in error in the legend to Fig.·3. The published version reads: Parameter functions for three gleaning echolocation call sequences of an individual M. septentrionalis. (A) Attack on non-arctiid moth; (B) attack on muted C. tenera; (C) attack on intact C. tenera. See Fig.·1 for further details. The correct version should read: Fig.·3. Parameter functions for three aerial hawking echolocation call sequences of an individual M. septentrionalis. (A) Attack on non-arctiid moth; (B) attack on muted C. tenera; (C) attack on intact C. tenera. See Fig.·1 for further details. The authors apologise for this mistake and any inconvenience caused to readers. THE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY The Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 4689-4698 4689 Published by The Company of Biologists 2005 doi:10.1242/jeb.01927 The adaptive function of tiger moth clicks against echolocating bats: an experimental and synthetic approach John M. Ratcliffe* and James H. Fullard Department of Zoology, University of Toronto at Mississauga, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G5, Canada *Author for correspondence at present address: Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Seeley G. Mudd Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 12 October 2005 Summary We studied the efficiency and effects of the multiple during aerial hawking attacks: tymbal clicks were sensory cues of tiger moths on echolocating bats.
    [Show full text]
  • LITERA TURE CITED CLOKEY, IW 951. Flora Of
    24 JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPI'ERISTS' SOCIETY LITERA TURE CITED CLOKEY, I. W. 951. Flora of the Charleston Mountains, Clark County, Nevada. Univ. Calif. Publ. Botany, No. 24. EMMEL, J. F. & O. SHIELDS. The biology of Plebejus (Icaricia) shasta in the western United Sta s (Lycaenidae). J. Res. Lepid., in press. FERRIS, C. D. 976. Revisionary notes on Plebejus (Icaricia) shasta (Edwards). Bull. Allyn Mus m, No. 36. GARTH,]. S. 1 8. Report of the Lorquin Entomological Society of Los Angeles. Proc. So. Calif. A ad. Sci. 27: 93-94. HALL, E. R. 1946. Mammals of Nevada. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley. HOWE, W. H. 1975. The butterflies of North America. Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y. JOHNSON, N. K. 1965. The breeding avifaunas of the Sheep and Spring ranges in southern Nevada. Condor 67: 93-124. SMITHE, F. B. 1975. Naturalist's color guide. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Societ!J 34(1), 1980,24 THE IDENTITY OF THE PLANT REFERRED TO AS ANDROMEDA BY W. T. M. FORBES The name Andromeda has been used ambiguously in the lepidopteran literature. A striking example is in its mention as a larval host for Datana major Grote and Robinson and Datana ranaeceps (Guerin) by Forbes (1948, Lepidoptera of New York ... II: Cornell U. Agric. Expt. Sta. Mem. 274, p. 215). The ranges of both of these species lie almost entirely to the south and east of the only species of the genus Andromeda covered by Fernald (1950, Gray's Manual of Botany, 8th ed. Amer. Book Co., N.Y., p.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2
    Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) by Boris C. Kondratieff, Paul A. Opler, Matthew C. Garhart, and Jason P. Schmidt C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 March 15, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration (top to bottom): Widow Skimmer (Libellula luctuosa) [photo ©Robert Behrstock], Stonefly (Perlesta species) [photo © David H. Funk, White- lined Sphinx (Hyles lineata) [photo © Matthew C. Garhart] ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Copyrighted 2004 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………….…1 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………..…………………………………………….…3 OBJECTIVE………………………………………………………………………………………….………5 Site Descriptions………………………………………….. METHODS AND MATERIALS…………………………………………………………………………….5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION………………………………………………………………………..…...11 Dragonflies………………………………………………………………………………….……..11
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • GIS Handbook Appendices
    Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Appendix D Cooperating Agency Codes The following table lists the aerial survey cooperating agencies and codes to be used in the agency1, agency2, agency3 fields of the flown/not flown coverages. The contents of this list is available in digital form (.dbf) at the following website: http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/publications/id/id_guidelines.html 28 Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Code Agency Name AFC Alabama Forestry Commission ADNR Alaska Department of Natural Resources AZFH Arizona Forest Health Program, University of Arizona AZS Arizona State Land Department ARFC Arkansas Forestry Commission CDF California Department of Forestry CSFS Colorado State Forest Service CTAES Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station DEDA Delaware Department of Agriculture FDOF Florida Division of Forestry FTA Fort Apache Indian Reservation GFC Georgia Forestry Commission HOA Hopi Indian Reservation IDL Idaho Department of Lands INDNR Indiana Department of Natural Resources IADNR Iowa Department of Natural Resources KDF Kentucky Division of Forestry LDAF Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry MEFS Maine Forest Service MDDA Maryland Department of Agriculture MADCR Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation MIDNR Michigan Department of Natural Resources MNDNR Minnesota Department of Natural Resources MFC Mississippi Forestry Commission MODC Missouri Department of Conservation NAO Navajo Area Indian Reservation NDCNR Nevada Department of Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) 1880 in Louisiana by Vernon Antoine Brou Jr., 74320 Jack Loyd Road, Abita Springs, Louisiana 70420 Email: [email protected]
    Catocala carissima Hulst, (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) 1880 in Louisiana by Vernon Antoine Brou Jr., 74320 Jack Loyd Road, Abita Springs, Louisiana 70420 email: [email protected] a b Fig. 1. Catocala carissima: a, male, b. female. 10 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 5 number of adults 0 Fig. 2. Catocala carissima captured mostly in light traps in Louisiana. n = 294 G. D. Hulst (1880) described Catocala cara var. carissima as a variation of Catocala cara Guenee, 1852. Barnes and McDunnough (1918) pictured adult, larva and genitalia ofcara , and said of cara, "in the southern part of its range (Texas to Florida), it forms the race carissima Hulst". Forbes (1954) states of cara, "The southern variation carissima Hulst is larger, browner, with pale apical patch; it is Floridian, but odd specimens and transitions occur as far north as New Jersey". Chapin and Callahan (1967) reported cara carissima from the Baton Rouge area without specific locality. Sargent (1976) reported cara form "carissima" in Florida, and that it is predominately southern, but taken in Long Island, New York. Covell (1984) states of cara, " form carissima more common than typical form southward". Knudson and Bordelon (1999) listed and illustrated carissima from Texas. Heppner (2003) listed carissima from Florida and occurring in the Fig. 3. Parish records by this author. southeast U.S.: Maryland to Florida and Missouri to Texas. I have captured the large underwing moth Catocala carissima Hulst (Fig.1) in Louisiana from the end of May through the end of November (Fig. 2) and it occurs commonly across the state (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Bionomics of Bagworms (Lepidoptera: Psychidae)
    ANRV363-EN54-11 ARI 27 August 2008 20:44 V I E E W R S I E N C N A D V A Bionomics of Bagworms ∗ (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) Marc Rhainds,1 Donald R. Davis,2 and Peter W. Price3 1Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 47901; email: [email protected] 2Department of Entomology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C., 20013-7012; email: [email protected] 3Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, 86011-5640; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2009. 54:209–26 Key Words The Annual Review of Entomology is online at bottom-up effects, flightlessness, mating failure, parthenogeny, ento.annualreviews.org phylogenetic constraint hypothesis, protogyny This article’s doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.54.110807.090448 Abstract Copyright c 2009 by Annual Reviews. The bagworm family (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) includes approximately All rights reserved 1000 species, all of which complete larval development within a self- 0066-4170/09/0107-0209$20.00 enclosing bag. The family is remarkable in that female aptery occurs in ∗The U.S. Government has the right to retain a over half of the known species and within 9 of the 10 currently recog- nonexclusive, royalty-free license in and to any nized subfamilies. In the more derived subfamilies, several life-history copyright covering this paper. traits are associated with eruptive population dynamics, e.g., neoteny of females, high fecundity, dispersal on silken threads, and high level of polyphagy. Other salient features shared by many species include a short embryonic period, developmental synchrony, sexual segrega- tion of pupation sites, short longevity of adults, male-biased sex ratio, sexual dimorphism, protogyny, parthenogenesis, and oviposition in the pupal case.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats a Symposium
    Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats A Symposium y Edited b Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS-145 DISCLAIMER The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. Papers published in these proceedings were submitted by authors in electronic media. Some editing was done to ensure a consistent format. Authors are responsible for content and accuracy of their individual papers and the quality of illustrative materials. Cover photos: Large photo: Craig W. Stihler; small left photo: Joseph S. Johnson; small middle photo: Craig W. Stihler; small right photo: Matthew J. Clement. December 2011 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats: A Symposium Athens, Georgia March 9–10, 2010 Edited by: Susan C. Loeb U.S Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station Michael J. Lacki University of Kentucky Darren A. Miller Weyerhaeuser NR Company Sponsored by: Forest Service Bat Conservation International National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources Offield Family Foundation ContEntS Preface . v Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats: An Introduction . 1 Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller Distribution and Status of Eastern Big-eared Bats (Corynorhinus Spp .) . 13 Mylea L. Bayless, Mary Kay Clark, Richard C. Stark, Barbara S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Psychidae)
    Eur. J. Entomol. 111(1): 121–136, 2014 doi: 10.14411/eje.2014.013 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Evaluation of criteria for species delimitation of bagworm moths (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) VERONICA CHEVASCO1, JELMER A. ELZINGA1, JOHANNA MAPPES2 and ALESSANDRO GRAPPUTO3 1 Department of Biological and Environmental Science, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland; e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Center of Excellence in Biological Interactions, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland; e-mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Biology, University of Padova, Via Ugo Bassi 58/B, I-35121 Padova, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Lepidoptera, Psychidae, Dahlica, Siederia, DNA barcoding, COI Abstract. Accurate identification of species is fundamental for biological research and necessary for species conservation. DNA bar- coding is particularly useful when identification using morphological characteristics is laborious and/or unreliable. However, bar- codes for species are dependent on the availability of reference sequences from correctly identified specimens. The traditional use of morphology to delimit the species boundaries of Finnish bagworm moths (Lepidoptera: Psychidae: Naryciinae: Dahliciini) is contro- versial because there is overlap in their morphological characteristics. In addition, there are no suitable molecular markers. We veri- fied the delimitation of seven out of eight previously described taxa, by using the currently standardized COI barcode and phylogenetic inference based on fragments of mitochondrial (COI) and nuclear genes (MDH). Moreover, we compared the results of molecular methods with the outcome of geometric morphometrics. Based on molecular identification, our findings indicate that there are five sexual species (Dahlica and Siederia spp.) and two parthenogenetic species (D.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions Toward a Lepidoptera (Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, Thyrididae, Drepanoidea, Geometro
    Contributions Toward a Lepidoptera (Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, Thyrididae, Drepanoidea, Geometroidea, Mimalonoidea, Bombycoidea, Sphingoidea, & Noctuoidea) Biodiversity Inventory of the University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Lab Hugo L. Kons Jr. Last Update: June 2001 Abstract A systematic check list of 489 species of Lepidoptera collected in the University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Lab is presented, including 464 species in the superfamilies Drepanoidea, Geometroidea, Mimalonoidea, Bombycoidea, Sphingoidea, and Noctuoidea. Taxa recorded in Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, and Thyrididae are also included. Moth taxa were collected at ultraviolet lights, bait, introduced Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), and by netting specimens. A list of taxa recorded feeding on P. notatum is presented. Introduction The University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Laboratory (NATL) contains 40 acres of natural habitats maintained for scientific research, conservation, and teaching purposes. Habitat types present include hammock, upland pine, disturbed open field, cat tail marsh, and shallow pond. An active management plan has been developed for this area, including prescribed burning to restore the upland pine community and establishment of plots to study succession (http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/natl.htm). The site is a popular collecting locality for student and scientific collections. The author has done extensive collecting and field work at NATL, and two previous reports have resulted from this work, including: a biodiversity inventory of the butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea & Papilionoidea) of NATL (Kons 1999), and an ecological study of Hermeuptychia hermes (F.) and Megisto cymela (Cram.) in NATL habitats (Kons 1998). Other workers have posted NATL check lists for Ichneumonidae, Sphecidae, Tettigoniidae, and Gryllidae (http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/insect.htm).
    [Show full text]