2Nd Annual State of Accessibility Report May 21St, 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2Nd Annual State of Accessibility Report May 21St, 2020 #SOAR 2nd Annual State of Accessibility Report May 21st, 2020 There are 2.2 Billion People Worldwide with a Visual Impairment According to the World Health Organization 1 Foreword By Joe Devon, Co-Founder of Diamond and Global Accessibility Awareness Day Much has happened since we launched our 1st State of Accessibility Report. At Diamond, we had our frst full year with an accessibility practice area. We’ve learned the pain organizations & accessibility professionals face when a project revolves around compliance issues. CTOs hate losing velocity on their roadmap and increased costs as the pressure mounts on the whole organization. Happily, our DNA is a company built by software developers for software developers. We have tai- lored our oferings to how CTOs think. Rather than focus on audits that slow down development, we actually fx the bugs and help with velocity. The results of this year’s report show that the state of accessibility on the web hasn’t changed con- siderably. Diamond has again performed a manual analysis of registration, login and logout of the top Alexa websites and found improvements. By contrast, Jared Smith updates us on his seminal WebAIM Million study, which shows worse results than last year. Sharron Rush, accessibility pioneer at Knowbility, has a somewhat somber update on accessibility in the K-12 space. Lastly, it is long overdue that we fatten the curve of inequality for People with Disabilities (“PwD”). It needs to start with the developer community. We will share our plans here to move the needle with the Diamond #GAADPledge, an initiative geared at infuencing developer culture. In the Age of the Coronavirus, the world has gone digital. This is our moment to shine! Joe Devon Joe Devon Co-Founder of Diamond 2 Table of Contents Foreword pg 2 The State of Accessibility in 2020 pg 4 Accessibility of the Registration, Login and Logout of the Alexa Top 100 pg 4 Web Technology Accessibility - What We Learn from the WebAIM Million pg 5 The State of Accessibility in EdTech for K-12 pg 8 In Conclusion pg 12 It is Time to Flatten the Curve of Digital Inequality for People with Disabilities pg 12 How to Improve the State of Accessibility pg 12 What is the #GAADPledge? pg 13 Diamond Launches the GAAD Pledge pg 13 Facebook Takes the GAAD Pledge pg 13 Diamond Invites You to Take the GAAD Pledge pg 13 Until Next Year pg 13 Appendix A pg 14 Annotated Bibliography pg 14 Contributors pg 17 About Diamond pg 17 About WebAIM pg 17 About Knowbility pg 17 #SOAR & Contact Info pg 18 3 State of Accessibility in 2020 Accessibility of the Registration, Login or form element trees made available by the and Logout of the Alexa Top 100 software. by Richard Nesbitt & Joe Devon, Diamond The AXE plugin for Chrome was used to identify If registration, login and logout sections of a lang, contrast, label and ARIA errors; this was run website are inaccessible, by defnition the entire on the frst screen of the registration process for site is inaccessible. To assess the state of the top the site. websites with respect to these three features, we Registration have manually tested the Alexa Top 100 web- sites. The process of registering on most sites can be broken down into the following four phases (not Technology Methodology all sites required #4): Technology used: • Find a link or button to start the registration • VoiceOver on Safari, macOS Mojave • Fill out the form • NVDA on Firefox, Windows 10 • Submit the form • JAWS on Internet Explorer 11, Windows 10 • Complete a confrmation process Can the following processes be accessed and Most of the failures recorded for the registration completed using only the keyboard and key process were from phase 1 or 2. If the initial op- combinations made available through the screen tion to begin registration was not available to the reading software? screen reader, the site was given a failing grade. Additionally, if the page contained any forms re- • Register quiring a CAPTCHA that had no audio alternative, • Log In the site was given a failing grade. • Log Out If you can register but you can’t login, that is con- If registration could not be completed, no further sidered a failure. testing was done in most instances. If you can login but you can’t logout, that is con- Login and Logout Upon successful registration, sidered a failure. testing of the login and logout processes was conducted. If the requisite elements (forms and/ The screen reader software listed above was or buttons) could not be accessed via the key- used to navigate through the registration pro- board, the site was given a failing grade in that cess, logging out of the site, and then logging category. back in. If registration could not be achieved, login and logout were not tested. “With Difculty” Any login and logout processes that seemed illogical, but were still completable, On occasions where the links, buttons, or forms were considered accessible “with difculty”. For did not receive focus at appropriate times, or example, triggering a login button or link and were for some reason unavailable by regular then needing to search for form elements/but- means of navigation, a search was done for the tons to proceed because focus was not given to appropriate element by accessing either the link the modal. 4 Results • 33% had either missing or improperly associ- ated feld labels Between last year and this year’s tests, we saw a • 15% had invalid ARIA usage signifcant improvement in sites that were acces- sible on all three screen reader platforms tested. Last year, 29% of sites tested were accessible 52 Had 15 Had without error. This year, that number jumped to Constant Invalid 40% of sites accessible without error. Errors ARIA Usage Alexa Top 100 33 Had 13 Were Missing or Missing a Incorrect Lang Field Attribute Labels 40% Accessible Causes of Failure There were varied reasons for 39% Inaccessible failure. In 3 cases, inaccessible “Terms of Ser- 21% Accessible vice” (“ToS”) caused the failures. There were 6 with Difficulties inaccessible captchas, 12 problems with ele- ment focus, 8 form element problems, and 18 We saw a decrease in sites that failed the tests. problems with :focus states. Last year, 43% of sites failed. This year, 39% Web Technology Accessibility - What failed. While not a huge improvement, at least it is better than last year. We Learn from the WebAIM Million By Jared Smith, WebAIM Last year, 28% of sites tested were accessible The WebAIM Million is an annual accessibili- “with difculty” as defned above. This year, that ty analysis of the home pages for the top one number dropped to 21% of sites accessible “with million web sites. It provides great insight into difculty”. We consider this to be an improve- the current state and trends of web accessibility. ment only because the 7% diference went to In February 2019 and February 2020, nearly 200 sites that have improved from the “with difculty” accessibility and technology characteristics of category to the completely accessible category. the one million home pages were collected. In Drilling Down Of the phases tested are registra- 2020, accessibility data for over 100,000 interi- tion, login, logout. or pages for the top 1,300 web sites were also collected. These data points provide a deep For Logins: perspective on the accessibility of home pages • 23% failed on all three screen readers across the web. This article focuses on trends • 25% failed on at least one screen reader from 2019 to 2020, and how the data from the WebAIM Million research can inform web acces- Other Accessibility Metrics Tested Of the top sibility improvements for users with disabilities. 100 Alexa websites: • 13% are missing a lang attribute Overview • 52% have contrast errors WebAIM conducted these analyses using the WAVE web accessibility evaluation tool. While 5 no automated tool can detect all accessibility 3. Empty links and buttons - 66% of home pag- issues, the detectable issues are often among es, 8.4 instances per page the most impactful for users with disabilities. 4. Missing form input labels - 54% of home pag- es, 1.9 instances per page 5. Missing document language - 28% of home Average Number of Errors pages Per Home Page 60.9 Cause of Most Common Accessibility Failures In February 2020, an average of 60.9 errors were detected per home page. Each introduc- Percentage of Average Failures es a barrier to users with certain disabilities and Home Pages Per Page refects non-conformance with the Web Content L Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). This is up from Contrast 36 Text 86% 59.6 errors in February 2019. 98.1% of home pag- es had at least one detectable WCAG 2 failure, Missing up from 97.8% in 2019. Image At 66% 12 Tex Interior pages within the most popular websites Empty had 53 errors on average. 97.8% of these interior Links and 8.4 Buttons 66% pages had detectable WCAG 2 failures. Missing These data suggest that accessibility for users Form Input 1.9 54% with disabilities is slowly getting worse over Labels time. This pervasive inaccessibility is a crisis for Missing the web design and development feld. Owners Doument 28% - Language of inaccessible web sites are subject to lawsuits and formal complaints under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Inaccessible web sites are All of these issues are readily preventable and less usable, more difcult to maintain, and less fxable. They refect a fundamental failure in use search engine compatible than those that have case development and an inattention to design been built with accessibility in mind.
Recommended publications
  • Make Your Marketing More Accessible June 20, 2019 Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio
    Make Your Marketing More Accessible June 20, 2019 Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 6/20/2019 VSA Ohio Welcome & Thanks • You • ArtsNow • City of Cuyahoga Falls • Ohio Arts Council 6/20/2019 VSA Ohio Agenda • Tip #1 – get to know your audience • Tip #2 – write an access statement • Tip #3 – audit your outlets • Tip #4 – use images • Tip #5 – adapt your designs • Tip #6 – the digital age • Tip #7 – spread the word • Your Marketing Materials *Ask Questions Any Time 6/20/2019 VSA Ohio Tip #1 Get to Know your Audience 6/20/2019 VSA Ohio Common Disabilities • Vision Loss • Hearing Loss • Mobility disability • Intellectual disability • Developmental disability • Learning disability • Speech / Language disability • Psychological / Emotional • Chronic health issues • Multiple disabilities 6/20/2019 VSA Ohio Vision 6/20/2019 VSA Ohio Mobility 6/20/2019 VSA Ohio Hidden 6/20/2019 VSA Ohio Market Power • Disposable income for working‐age people with disabilities is about $490 Billion. • Discretionary income for working‐age people with disabilities is about $21 Billion. ‐ African Americans ($3 billion); Hispanics ($16 billion) • 66% of consumers will purchase good and services from a business that features people with disability in their advertising. • 78% of consumers will purchase goods and services from a business that takes steps to ensure easy access for people with disabilities. • The market potential is even larger when one considers the friends, family members, caregivers, colleagues, and others who are connected to consumers with disabilities. American Institutes for Research (April 2018) 6/20/2019 VSA Ohio Examples Microsoft – new game control Swiffer – everyday cleaning 6/20/2019 VSA Ohio Partners + People • Involve people with disabilities! • Word of Mouth is Very important • Service Organizations / Providers • Advocacy Groups • County Boards of Disabilities • Get to know your regional partners 6/20/2019 VSA Ohio Tip #2 Write an Access Statement 6/20/2019 VSA Ohio Access Statement • Tell your audiences what / who you stand for.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019: Center for Persons with Disabilities
    ANNUAL REPORT 2019 CENTER FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES CPD MISSION We are working together to create inclusive communities and improve the lives of children and adults with disabilities and their families through sustainable innovation, collaborative research, responsive service, and interdisciplinary training and education. CONTACT THE CPD Phone:435-797-1981 www.cpd.usu.edu Address: 6800 Old Main Hill Logan, UT 84322-6800 From the Director THIS PAST YEAR AT THE CPD has been marked by new projects, new personnel, and a renewed focus on building partnerships on campus, in our communities, and across the country. In the pursuit of our mission to create more inclusive communities and improve the lives of individuals with disabilities and their families, we have focused our efforts on diversifying our projects and expanding our reach into the community, state, and nation. New projects have strengthened our efforts on mental health issues, employment supports for people with disabilities, and literacy. This year marks the best funding year for the CPD in the past five years, which is a testament to the hard work of our dedicated staff. The fact that we have continued to grow, in spite of a challenging funding environment, is a clear indicator that the CPD is adapting Dr. Matthew Wappett and evolving. Much of our success has come from new federal and CPD Executive Director state partnerships that build upon the reputation of our people and programs. In FY 2019, CPD staff worked on 114 different projects delivering training, conducting research, and providing technical assistance in every Utah county, 46 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Least You Need to Know
    Accessibility Maintainers of WebLearn sites need to be aware of accessibility issues, for users with various types of impairment Why are accessibility issues important? Have you ever experienced problems such as Repetitive Strain Injury (RSI), sore eyes, headaches, back or shoulder aches from long term use of a computer? Are you perhaps colour blind, have a touch of dyslexia, or need magnification of the computer screen? Are you sensitive to screen flashing due to photo-sensitive epilepsy? It is not only major sensory impairments such as vision or hearing disabilities which impede people in their use of technology. In many cases, assistive/adaptive/access technology (AT) can be used to enable or facilitate the use, navigation, creation or completion of electronic materials (such as web pages, online forms, Internet services and products) that would be inaccessible by conventional means. Assistive technologies include screen readers (such as JAWS, ReadPlease, BrowseAloud) or screen enlargers (magnifiers), voice recognition systems, alternative input devices such as eye or head operated pointing devices. The Opera browser now includes voice-enabled shopping and booking systems and spoken commands to browse the web. What types of impairments need to be considered? It helps to classify types of impairments in order be able to address differing needs (AbilityNet (www.abilitynet.org.uk) • Vision – including blindness, partial sightedness, colour blindness and tunnel vision • Hearing – deaf and partial hearing • Headings are an absolute Mobility problems – RSI, problems with using hands or arms asset – you can key through • Cognitive, mental problems – including dyslexia, learning problems them by ‘arrowing down’ A quotation from a blind person browsing internet sites with the help of a screen reader: (using the down arrow on the keyboard) Holistic approach to web design Build your Content first (in a simple, linear layout), add styling on top of that (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Webaim Campus Training Session 2
    WebAIM Campus Training-Session 2 OK, another aspect of accessibility for users with low vision is ensuring that there is sufficient contrast between the text content and the background. This is something that impacts everybody. We all have difficulty reading content if there is insufficient contrast. It is important to keep in mind that ultimately the end user has control over the way they view your web content. They can change colors. They can invert contrast. They can enable high contrast to override your colors to view content in a way that works best for them. So keep that in mind. This is always something that they can do. That idea that we fully control the user experience-- we have to give that up. We have to give up that notion that we control what the user is going to see or what they're going to do. What we want to do instead is to enable a good experience. If the user comes and they customize, they adapt the content for their own needs, what we have provided still is going to work for them. To ensure that you provide sufficient contrast, WCAG does define this for you. They provide some measures. All you have to do is implement this very basic formula, and just put this in your memory banks and you'll be good. No, you don't want to be doing this complex math to determine if your content has sufficient contrast. You want to use tools like the WebAIM Contrast Checker. This is a tool that we've built.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessibility Requirements for UH Websites.Pdf
    Accessibility Requirements for UH Websites Section 508 and WCAG 2.0 Level A & AA These slides are at goo.gl/09Ifa2 Mitchell Ryan Sunny Ochi McCalla Walker ITS ITS UH Hilo ochi rmcalla swalker @hawaii.edu @hawaii.edu @hawaii.edu What is Accessibility? Accessibility is about access, not disability. Why is Accessibility Important? Without accessibility, those with disabilities would not be able to participate in this increasingly technology driven world. Physical Disabilities ● Color blind ● Low-vision or legally blind ● Hearing loss ● Low motor control ● Cognitive (e.g., dyslexia, high stress, non-native speaker, etc.) ● and more… Environmental/Temporary Disabilities ● Very small or large screen sizes ● Touch-only or keyboard-only ● Projected or on a TV ● Poor lighting ● Slow connection speed ● Background noise ● Printed ● User-overridden style sheets ● and more… Browser “Disabilities” ● Old IE ● Edge ● Safari (the new IE) ● Chrome ● Firefox ● Opera Mini ● UC Browser ● WebView (in-app) ● Different versions of the same browser ● and more… 2 Rule Sets Section 508 Law: www.section508.gov Checklist: webaim.org/standards/508/checklist WCAG 2.0 Specs: www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20 508 ♥ WCAG Checklist: webaim.org/standards/wcag/checklist Compliance Deadline (spoiler: January 18, 2018) Section 508 or WCAG 2.0? Already 508 compliant? Not yet 508 compliant? Should update Must update to WCAG 2.0 A and AA. to WCAG 2.0 A and AA. “Safe-harbor” exemption if already fully compliant as of January 2018. What does compliance mean? What I see is not what you get. Alt
    [Show full text]
  • Cen Cwa 15778 Workshop Agreement
    CEN CWA 15778 WORKSHOP February 2008 AGREEMENT ICS 35.240.30 English version Document Processing for Accessibility This CEN Workshop Agreement has been drafted and approved by a Workshop of representatives of interested parties, the constitution of which is indicated in the foreword of this Workshop Agreement. The formal process followed by the Workshop in the development of this Workshop Agreement has been endorsed by the National Members of CEN but neither the National Members of CEN nor the CEN Management Centre can be held accountable for the technical content of this CEN Workshop Agreement or possible conflicts with standards or legislation. This CEN Workshop Agreement can in no way be held as being an official standard developed by CEN and its Members. This CEN Workshop Agreement is publicly available as a reference document from the CEN Members National Standard Bodies. CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom. EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG Management Centre: rue de Stassart, 36 B-1050 Brussels © 2008 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national Members. Ref. No.:CWA 15778:2008 D/E/F CWA 15778:2008 (E) Contents Page
    [Show full text]
  • Webaim Quick Reference: Testing Web Content for Accessibility
    Quick Reference: Testing Web Content for Accessibility Test with Check keyboard accessibility Run a report at wave.webaim.org. For very complex or The first time testing with Mac, press Control + F7 to non-public pages, use the WAVE Chrome or Firefox enable full keyboard accessibility. extension (wave.webaim.org/extension). o In Safari, select Preferences > Advanced > o Watch the overview video on the WAVE homepage. Accessibility > Press Tab to highlight each Error icons flag known issues. Other icons identify item… potential problems or features. Click an icon to highlight Navigate the page using only the keyboard: the corresponding element and learn more using the o Tab: Navigate interactive elements (links, form Reference panel. controls, etc.) Use the Details panel to review page issues. Click an o Shift + Tab: Navigate backwards. icon to find it in the page. Uncheck icons to hide them. o Enter: Activate links or buttons, submit most forms. Turn off Styles to simplify the page view and to check o Spacebar: Activate checkboxes and buttons, expand a the reading and navigation order. select menu, or scroll the window. Click the Code button at the bottom of the page to see o Arrow keys: Navigate radio buttons, the page code with WAVE icons. select/dropdown menus, sliders, tab panels, tree Images menus, etc. Ensure alternative text (shown in green) conveys the Look for mouse-only interaction (e.g., rollover menus). equivalent content and/or function of the image. Confirm every focusable element has a keyboard focus Look for ways to replace images of text with true text.
    [Show full text]
  • Web Accessibility for Designers Great Web Accessibility Starts in the Design
    Web Accessibility FOR Designers Great web accessibility starts in the design. Plan Heading Structure Early Ensure all content and design fits into a logical heading structure. Ensure Logical Reading Order The reading order for screen reader users should align with the visual order. Provide Good Contrast Good Be especially careful with shades of orange, Bad yellow, and light gray. Use True Text Instead of Images of Text Abc True text enlarges better, loads faster, and is easier to translate and customize. Use Adequate Font Size AAA Small text is difficult for all users to see. Ensure text is optimally readable. Remember Line Length Abcdefg Don’t make lines too long or too short. Make Sure Links are Recognizable Link Distinguish links from body text using more than just color (e.g., underline). Design Keyboard Focus Indicators When navigating with the keyboard, the focused item must be visually distinctive. Design a “Skip to Main Content” Link Skip A keyboard accessible link for users to skip navigation should be at the top of the page. Ensure Link Text Makes Sense on Its Own Click Here Avoid “Click Here” or other ambiguous link text, such as “More” or “Continue”. Design Usable Widgets and Controls Dialogs, tooltips, menus, carousels, etc. must be easy to use and accessible. Use Animation, Video, and Audio Carefully Provide play/pause buttons. Avoid distracting movement. Don’t Convey Content Using Only Color Users may override or may not be able to see differences between colors. Design Accessible Form Controls First Name Ensure form controls have descriptive labels, Submit instructions, and error messages.
    [Show full text]
  • July 11, 2018 MEMORANDUM TO: State Board of Regents FROM
    TAB A State Board of Regents Phone 801.321.7101 Board of Regents Building, The Gateway Fax 801.321.7199 60 South 400 West TDD 801.321.7130 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101-1284 www.higheredutah.org July 11, 2018 MEMORANDUM TO: State Board of Regents FROM: David L. Buhler SUBJECT: General Consent Calendar The Commissioner recommends approval of the following items on the Regents’ General Consent Calendar: A. Minutes 1. Minutes of the Board Meeting May 18, 2018, Salt Lake Community College, Salt Lake City, Utah (Attachment). B. Grant Proposals 1. University of Utah – University of California San Francisco; “Pediatric TB”; $1,120,922. Swomitra Kumar Mohanty, Principal Investigator. 2. University of Utah – NIH Natl Ctr Complementary & Altrn Medcn; “Blueberry Derived Metabolites”; $1,444,408/ Amamdj Babu Velayutham, Principal Investigator. 3. University of Utah – US Department of Energy; “MUSE”; $16,000,000. Darryl P Butt, Principal Investigator. 4. University of Utah – US Department of Energy; “Radioelement Halide EFRC”; $1,199,998. Michael F Simpson, Principal Investigator. 5. University of Utah – NIH National Institute on Aging; “Supiano R01 April 2018”; $2,108,474. Katherine Perry Supiano, Principal Investigator. 6. University of Utah – DHHS National Institutes of Health; “Multiplexed PTP Probes”; $1,906,250. Amy M Barrios, Principal Investigator. 7. University of Utah – DHHS National Institutes of Health; “Virtual Coaching”; $2,442,813. Rebecca L Utz, Principal Investigator. 8. University of Utah – American Cancer Society Inc; “4-2-18_Kirchhoff_ACS”; $1,219,546. Ann C Kirchhoff, Principal Investigator. General Consent Calendar July 20, 2018 Page 2 9. University of Utah – NIH National Institute of Mental Health; “Bilder Resubmission 4.10.18”; $3,812,500.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Regent/Trustee Retreat July 19, 2018 Southern Utah University, R Haze Hunter Conference Center
    Joint Regent/Trustee Retreat July 19, 2018 Southern Utah University, R Haze Hunter Conference Center 10:30 – 11:30 a.m. Pre-Session—Audit Committee Training Director of Audit & Financial Services David Pulsipher and Associate Commissioner Kimberly L. Henrie Location: Whiting Room 11:45 – 1:15 p.m. Opening Session – Lunch Location: Great Hall • Welcome Chair Harris Simmons, Chair Eric Leavitt • Lunch • Higher Education Strategic Plan and Initiatives Commissioner David L. Buhler Breakout Sessions: 1:30 - 2:30 p.m. Breakout Session #1 (both sessions repeat) • How Regents and Trustees Can Help Presidents Be Successful – (Location: Whiting Room) Selection and support for institutional presidents are critical to institutional…and higher education…success in Utah. In this session learn about Trustee and Regent roles and collaboration in conducting successful presidential searches and how presidential resource and review teams can help and support institutional presidents. o Associate Commissioner Elizabeth Hitch, President Emeritus David Pershing, and Assistant Commissioner/Legal Counsel Geoff Landward • New Regents’ Initiatives to Improve Access to Higher Education – (Location: Charles Hunter Room) While a college education is more important than ever, there are still significant barriers to even getting in the door. Learn how the Board of Regents is helping Utah high school students find their way to college through three exciting new initiatives: Automatic Acceptance Letters, Student Aid and Tuition Policy Evaluation and Redesign, and StepUp
    [Show full text]
  • USU Greats 2019-2020
    The Greats2019–2020 USU President Noelle E. Cockett shared her presidential priorities on Oct. 1, 2019, at the State of the University Address. Her priorities for the institution include ways in which the university is currently succeeding and aspirations for future success. All priorities fall within the university’s mission of learning, discovery, and engagement. USUTM United Presidential Priorities Inspire Student Success, Including Experiential Learning 1 Provide Access to Post-Secondary Education for Underserved Populations and Communities 3 Strengthen USU’s Trajectory of Research Distinction 5 Communicate and Develop Excellence in Water, Land, and Air Research 9 Increase Diversity of Students, Faculty, and Staff, and Promote Inclusiveness and Respect 11 Facilitate Student and Faculty Entrepreneurship 13 Expand Outreach to Utah Citizens in the Areas of Health and Well-Being 15 Continue to Compete in the Upper-Echelon of the Mountain West Conference 16 Fund the Future 17 Year of the Woman 7 Inspire Student Success, INCLUDING EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING Going Gold onors students and Undergraduate Frederickson studies combinatorics, HResearch Fellows Bryce Frederickson a branch of mathematics that analyzes and Ethan Hammer were named 2019 patterns in discrete objects. Following Goldwater Scholars in a prestigious graduation from USU in 2020, he plans national competition that recognizes to pursue doctoral studies. outstanding achievements in science Hammer has spent two summers and mathematics. of his undergraduate career conducting research with the National Park Ser- vice on varied mammalian species in southern Utah’s majestic Cedar Breaks National Monument. Following graduation from USU in 2020, Hammer plans to pursue a doctoral degree in conservation biology.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping out SXSW Interactive: an Information Session for Ontario Interactive Media Firms
    Scoping out SXSW Interactive: an information session for Ontario interactive media firms Interested in doing some intelligence-gathering at the upcoming SXSW Interactive? Looking to meet with some like-minded U.S. firms in Austin, TX between March 7-11? Come find out more about this key interactive media happening and the opportunities for Canadian firms in the Austin, Texas and the South-Central U.S. Some financial support is available for qualified Canadian companies to help defray travel and accommodation costs while in Austin. In addition, Canadian Heritage, Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada, Industry Canada and the Canadian Interactive Alliance/l’Alliance interactive canadienne will be assisting with B2B meeting opportunities and providing a trade show booth to showcase companies’ offerings. Speakers: Bijoy Goswami, founder, Bootstrap Austin and author, “The Human Fabric” Michael Mendoza, Trade Commissioner, Canadian Consulate General (Dallas) Michael O’Byrne, Trade Commissioner, International Trade Canada Regional Office Topics discussed include: Business Strategies & The Influence of Interactive Media The Demand for New Interactive Advertising Solutions Creating Opportunities at South By Southwest The New Media Industry in Texas Venue: Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada’s Toronto offices 3rd floor boardroom 151 Yonge Street, Toronto (Corner of Yonge and Richmond, one block south of Queen) Date and start time: Friday, February 8, 9:00 a.m. sharp Cost: Free! For more information on this session or anything
    [Show full text]