DOCSLIB.ORG

Double Storey Brick Dwelling

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Double Storey Brick Dwelling KHOE 269 The Esplanade, Mt Pleasant. reference: KHOE HOUSE COVER SHEET © C O P Y R I G H T 1b/157 Main Street Osborne Park W.A, Australia t : (08) 9201 9993 w: dcdesign.com.au e: [email protected] 269 The Esplanade Mt Pleasant. THIS PLAN SHALL REMAIN THE SOLE PROPERTY OF D.C.D AND MUST NOT BE GIVEN, LENT, RESOLD, HIRED OUT OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF OR COPIED WITHOUT THE PERMISSION IN WRITING FROM D.C.D. Document Set ID: 5141032 Version: 2, Version Date: 12/03/2021 Road Descr. Bitumen Services: Gas PhoneYes BUILDING SITE INSPECTION REPORT MSD REF Check Your Lot With Alinta Comms. DWELLING AREAS SERVICE AND CONTOUR SKETCH 432-25/29 Kerbing Semi-Mount / Nil Call 13 13 58 TOTAL AREA (ALL STORIES) Water Yes Sewer Yes OLD Condition Good 01.PORCH 3.87 Client Khoe AREA Footpath Concrete Electricity O/Head Licensed Surveyors c 06.BALCONY 26.48 Date House No. 13 Oct 20 269 With 05.ALFRESCO 35.09 Rendered Condition Good & Coastal Zone 87-89 Guthrie Street, Osborne Park, Western Australia Tile 03.GARAGE 44.27 Lot No. Area Street The Esplanade YES 2 55 1012m² (Scaled from StreetSmart Directory Under Sand Telephone: (08) 9446 7361 Facsimile: (08) 9445 2998 - Soil # Only - Confirm With Shire) Storey 02.GROUND FLOOR 132.68 271 Email : [email protected] Website: www.cottage.com.au On Suburb Mt Pleasant Shire CITY OF MELVILLE Drainage Good 06.SECOND FLOOR 174.97 Slab Brick Fencing and As Shown Croft 04.FIRST FLOOR 176.60 Plan 5014 C/T Vol. 1618 Fol 36 Vegetation Refer to Survey other improvements J/N: DATE: SCALE: DRAWN: 593.96 m2 Special Features As Shown 481132 13 Oct 20 1:200 B. Saliba S First Floor S E E >>> >>> >>> SEC Dome Approx>>> Sewer Power Pole T C Phone Pits ( 1 . W Water Conn. 72 . M Garage W Door W [TP 10.00 ] Top Pillar/Post 40 ) / [TW10.00 ] Top Wall H Garage m Door by ( Ref LEGEND [TR 10.00 ] Top Retaining Established [TF 10.00 ] Top Fence N the N Nail Ground Floor GONE PEG [ Geodetic LOT MISCLOSE TP At [ TW GONE PEG 4 [ [ [ Base [ [ TW TW TW TW TF UMR Patio 0.000 m . Nil 2 from 13 . 6 0 6 . 4 6 5 4 89 . Section Of 63 . TW . [ 7.21 ] ] B 05 63 16 SOIL DESCRIPTION 84 4 4 . 2 L Kerb . 2 M 2.03 . Sewer M/H . 72 ] Sand / 19 1 Box 77 Hedge/Vine Hedge/Vine (Not Located In Field. Plotted . ] . ] ] ] C 1 3.38 ] Refer to Survey .9903 50.29 4.80 C . From Water Corp. Sheet Only) 88 2 4 2 Gate 4 of A 4 4 W 3 . 4 240 . 3.72 Ht Ø Citrus 4.94 3.07 4.87 4.87 68 . 5.155 08 Paving Paving 07 2 3.38 . 73 . 5 3 1 3 . 4 1 2 40 4 9597 3 4 95 Gate H Meter . Landgate . .. Citrus Trees . 12 3 . 0 . DISCLAIMER: . 43 44 Rock . 90 . 91 90 32 Concrete 3 4 9091 83 . 95 In 71 Ht Ø Citrus 4.90 53 5 5 4 . D . ( using 4 Due to lack of survey marks/pegs, all building offset . 74 2 6.92 69 ° Metal [TF ] 3 0 . 0 m I 0 Hatch 93 . 92 m 4 dimensions & features are approximate only and ' . 43 Tree 90 level 90 2 In 0 O . 3 . ( 2 Retaining . " Step UMR & positioned from existing pegs/fences and walls 0 Metal 17 Rendered . ° m ° Gate Bore Note I m 38 Hatch 0 3 0 Tree . Meter . 38 4 Vines Galv data which may not be on the correct alignment. Any ) Paving Approx O ' ' 0 3 0 At [ ) Steps . TW 2 " 3 . " ( design that involves additions to any structures 88 75 . .35 3 1 3 Semi 3 Gas . 4 - 2 76 . Approx At Rear . : ) Storey 5 shown or portion of structures remaining after . 73 5 Gardenbed G 52 72 . Pool . 43 . supplied 86 Sill . 3 . 3 4 3 On 0 any demolition has taken place requires boundaries 0 Box 3 4 . Front Paving 78 Gardenbed Steps m . ) 31 . 28 . 40 . - 73 93 to be repegged and exact offsets provided to your 2 House The Sill Mount 2 3 Brick . 4 50 Door Fence 5 . Slab . Structure 4 designer/architect before any plans are produced 2 . 75 3 57 2.53 4 . 99 House 2 Vine . 22 . 4 ] 3 and before any work is started on site. 53 93 93 Door 74 Closest To . 3 . 99 Fibreglass 4.92 5 This design by Setbacks ( Approx 69 4.94 4 20 On 1 . Ht Ø Tree 2 This F DISCLAIMER: Belowground 2 71 . 1 1 . Boundary 90 Lot boundaries drawn on survey are 89 28 2 . / 0 L . 65 Water 5 2 On . F & 82 70 Rock . NOTE 4 . 3 5 . 5 based on landgate plan only. Survey does not 12 . / 0 . line . Rendered 3 line Views L 44 Ht Ø Tree Esplanade Galv m 68 River 2 3 95 include title search and as such may not show 2 . m 3 Wire . 41 . 3 Gate . 43 68 work Concrete . 31 2 0 easements or other interests not shown on plan. 3 Sewer 15 Ht Ø Citrus 3 Retaining 69 . 2 . 5 . is 38 . 72 is Corp 7 3 - MUST 40 . 4 . 4 Title should be checked to verify all lot details Pool . # Pole Storey 0 67 . m . 35 4 On 5 0 NOT 67 Approx 97 269 97 NOT . and for any easements or other interests which At Steps . 2 m [TF 6.95 ] : . 4 0 is 30 m may affect building on the property. 3 m . Tree . Clearance Front L 20 94 NOTE Inv In Sewer . 5 Brick undertaken before / 5 69 Sill an stone At . be definitive : 4 Path . DISCLAIMER: 4 35 Approx 5 35 : 6 TF 6.95 . [ ] . 2 Pump RGB 2 . Survey does not include verification of cadastral House 95 - 2 97 Rear . 3 00 12 easement 5 confirmed 0 6 . .53 2 . Door boundaries. All features and levels shown are 40 67 71 . : 3 04 3 Up . Vines Junction . 57 72 Sill UP based on orientation to existing pegs and fences 1 2 4 any 1 . 1 . Depth 41 86 Ht Ø Tree (top&gl) . : [ only which may not be on correct cadastral alignment. TW Window . House 97 3.69 Line 81 69 3 On 1 4 F 3.46 5 0 . Steps 78 3.65 . Any designs based or dependent on the location of 6 . ] / . UMR . 1 2 . 63 00 L 5 Pool & 0 4 existing features should have those features' . Rendered (top&gl) Paving m 16 ) : 2 m . location verified in relation to the true boundary. Galv 96 1 523.03 3.67 1 1 2 2 2 Line Clothes . F Light Pole 5 2 . 2 . In On Undercroft 86 95 36 50 - 18 / 22 DISCLAIMER: Crossover 2.51 2.63 2.65 L [ Storey 5 Concrete 5 TR 5 . Area Survey shows visible features only and will not Paving Paving . On . 03 30 Galv show locations of underground pipes or conduits 33 5 On 4 4 Nil Citrus Brick for internal or mains services. Verification of 22 . Slab . Bushes . 02 96 . 35 95 4 the location of all internal and mains services 3435 . ( Paving [ 4 Tree . top TR [ 1 2 2 Carport 95 1 TR Ht Ø Tree should be confirmed prior to finalisation of any . 4 40 Step . 94 17 Buired 94 4 2 ] . 83 2 4 & design work. Buired . 2 9796 [TF 6.93 ] 0 90 90 . gl 2 . 5 3 3 Ht Ø Tree 10 52 65 41 . Ht Ø Tree 48 . BBQ 69 4.49 ) 44 . 4.41 6 . 2 ° ° . Galv Shed NOTE Inv In Sewer 2 09 2 10 0 0 Semi 0 . 0 DISCLAIMER: m 2 0 Power 4 Galv 2 Shed . 1 5 0 . 3 Step ' ' . Pole 0 0 46 73 . 90 : . 6 m Cottage & Engineering surveys accept no . 30 2 5 5 0 Citrus Trees 14 " " 54 : 0 2 2 77 . m ° m 2 m 07 ] . 0 3 m responsibility for any physical on site changes to . 1 Gardenbed 13 ] . Brick Ret. Wall ' 1 . - 17 Vines 0 . 7 . 4.50 Vines Mount the parcel or portion of the parcel of land shown " : 1 2.62 63 & Small Trees 3.12 Junction UP [ Step Depth . [ Brick [ [ on this survey including any adjoining neighbours TF Wall TW 77 TW TW 5.00 [ TW levels and features that have occurred after the Vines 5.16[ 1 2 Pole Consumer TF date on this survey. All Sewer details plotted .85 . 6 0 6 3 50.29 3 . 6 2 60 Crossover 6 Consumer : . from information supplied by Water Corporation. Concrete . 60 GONE PEG 19 73 . GONE PEG 03 1 . 86 Overhead 60 . Nil Power 4 Scale 1:200 Cable ] ] ] ] O NOTE ] ] / 02468 Head Obstructed 2 Carport Ground / BEWARE . 30 UMR Floor Approx power At Front Approx Approx Sill : Sewer Sewer Sewer ADVISE Obstructed House ( ( lines 1 1 2 First Floor Door . & . 2 Balcony 52 52 53 - UMR . Tile Storey ) ) M M 36 36 # On TRADES / / F H H m m 267 On / >>> >>> L >>> >>> Brick Slab Scale 1:200 0 2 4 6 8 8,000 15,110 27,180 First Floor S E >>> Approx>>> Sewer ( 1 . 72 . M Garage Door W 40 ) / H 2 Garage m OVERSHADOWING= 209.30 m Door by ( Ref Established the N Nail Ground Floor GONE PEG [ Geodetic PROPOSED RETAINNG PROPOSED RETAINNG TP At [ TW GONE PEG WALL TOP @ 2.572 WALL TOP @ 3.172 4 [ [ [ Base [ [ TW TW TW TW TF UMR Patio .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • City Maintained Street Inventory
    City Maintained Streets Inventory DATE APPROX. AVG. STREET NAME ACCEPTED BEGINNING AT ENDING AT LENGTH WIDTH ACADEMYText0: ST Text6: HENDERSONVLText8: RD BROOKSHIREText10: ST T0.13 Tex20 ACADEMYText0: ST EXT Text6: FERNText8: ST MARIETTAText10: ST T0.06 Tex17 ACTONText0: WOODS RD Text6:9/1/1994 ACTONText8: CIRCLE DEADText10: END T0.24 Tex19 ADAMSText0: HILL RD Text6: BINGHAMText8: RD LOUISANAText10: AVE T0.17 Tex18 ADAMSText0: ST Text6: BARTLETText8: ST CHOCTAWText10: ST T0.16 Tex27 ADAMSWOODText0: RD Text6: CARIBOUText8: RD ENDText10: OF PAVEMENT T0.16 Tex26 AIKENText0: ALLEY Text6: TACOMAText8: CIR WESTOVERText10: ALLEY T0.05 Tex12 ALABAMAText0: AVE Text6: HANOVERText8: ST SWANNANOAText10: AVE T0.33 Tex24 ALBEMARLEText0: PL Text6: BAIRDText8: ST ENDText10: MAINT T0.09 Tex18 ALBEMARLEText0: RD Text6: BAIRDText8: ST ORCHARDText10: RD T0.2 Tex20 ALCLAREText0: CT Text6: ENDText8: C&G ENDText10: PVMT T0.06 Tex22 ALCLAREText0: DR Text6: CHANGEText8: IN WIDTH ENDText10: C&G T0.17 Tex18 ALCLAREText0: DR Text6: SAREVAText8: AVE CHANGEText10: IN WIDTH T0.18 Tex26 ALEXANDERText0: DR Text6: ARDIMONText8: PK WINDSWEPTText10: DR T0.37 Tex24 ALEXANDERText0: DR Text6: MARTINText8: LUTHER KING WEAVERText10: ST T0.02 Tex33 ALEXANDERText0: DR Text6: CURVEText8: ST ARDMIONText10: PK T0.42 Tex24 ALLENText0: AVE 0Text6:/18/1988 U.S.Text8: 25 ENDText10: PAV'T T0.23 Tex19 ALLENText0: ST Text6: STATEText8: ST HAYWOODText10: RD T0.19 Tex23 ALLESARNText0: RD Text6: ELKWOODText8: AVE ENDText10: PVMT T0.11 Tex22 ALLIANCEText0: CT 4Text6:/14/2009 RIDGEFIELDText8:
    [Show full text]
  • Pavements and Surface Materials
    N O N P O I N T E D U C A T I O N F O R M U N I C I P A L O F F I C I A L S TECHNICAL PAPER NUMBER 8 Pavements and Surface Materials By Jim Gibbons, UConn Extension Land Use Educator, 1999 Introduction Traffic Class Type of Road Pavements are composite materials that bear the weight of 1 Parking Lots, Driveways, Rural pedestrian and vehicular loads. Pavement thickness, width and Roads type should vary based on the intended function of the paved area. 2 Residential Streets 3 Collector Roads Pavement Thickness 4 Arterial roads 5 Freeways, Expressways, Interstates Pavement thickness is determined by four factors: environment, traffic, base characteristics and the pavement material used. Based on the above classes, pavement thickness ranges from 3" for a Class 1 parking lot, to 10" or more for Class 5 freeways. Environmental factors such as moisture and temperature significantly affect pavement. For example, as soil moisture Sub grade strength has the greatest effect in determining increases the load bearing capacity of the soil decreases and the pavement thickness. As a general rule, weaker sub grades require soil can heave and swell. Temperature also effects the load thicker asphalt layers to adequately bear different loads associated bearing capacity of pavements. When the moisture in pavement with different uses. The bearing capacity and permeability of the freezes and thaws, it creates stress leading to pavement heaving. sub grade influences total pavement thickness. There are actually The detrimental effects of moisture can be reduced or eliminated two or three separate layers or courses below the paved wearing by: keeping it from entering the pavement base, removing it before surface including: the sub grade, sub base and base.
    [Show full text]
  • Brick Streets Plan
    BRICK STREETS PLAN City of Rock Island Community & Economic Development Department Planning & Redevelopment Division Rock Island Preservation Commission Adopted 1988 by Rock Island City Council Amended: January 23, 2012 August 22, 2011 March 28, 2005 April 10, 2000 May 12, 1997 September 14, 1992 Rock Solid. Rock Island. 1899 - The first brick pavement was laid in the Tri-Cities on the corner of Twentieth Street and Second Avenue, Rock Island. The first brick was placed by Mayor William McConochie. Civil Engineer for the project was H.G. Paddock. -- From Historical Souvenir of Moline and Vicinity, 1909 TABLE of CONTENTS Executive Summary ..................................................................................... 3 Prioritization List ........................................................................................... 5 Map of Brick Streets ..................................................................................... 6 Methodology ................................................................................................ 9 History of Brick Street Construction in Rock Island ...................................... 10 Condition of Brick Streets ............................................................................. 13 Utilities and Brick Streets ............................................................................. 17 Street Standards .......................................................................................... 18 Owner-Occupancy Along Brick Streets .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Access Management Manual, September 5, 2019 TABLE of CONTENTS
    AccessAccess ManagementManagement ManualManual T E X A S Prepared by the City of Irving Public Works/Traffic and Transportation Department Adopted September 5, 2019 Access Management Manual, September 5, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Introduction Page 1.0 Purpose 1 1.1 Scope 1 1.2 Definitions 3 1.3 Authority 10 Section 2 Principles of Access Management 2.1 Relationship between Access and Mobility 11 2.2 Integration of Land Use and Transportation 11 2.3 Relationship between Access and Roadway Efficiency 12 2.4 Relationship between Access and Traffic Safety 12 Section 3 Access Management Programs and Policies 3.1 Identifying Functional Hierarchy of Roadways 14 3.1.1 Sub-Classifications of Roadways 14 3.1.1.1 Revising the “Master Thoroughfare Plan” 15 3.1.2 Comprehensive Plan 15 3.1.3 Discretionary Treatment by the Director 15 3.2 Land Use 15 3.3 Unified Access Planning Policy 16 3.4 Granting Access 16 3.4.1 General Mutual Access 17 3.4.2 Expiration of Access Permission 17 3.4.3 “Grandfathered” Access and Non-Conforming Access 17 3.4.4 Illegal Access 19 3.4.4.1 Stealth Connection 19 3.4.5 Temporary Access 19 3.4.6 Emergency Access 19 3.4.7 Abandoned Access 20 3.4.8 Field Access 20 3.4.9 Provision for Special Case Access 20 3.4.10 Appeals, Variances and Administrative Remedies 20 3.5 Parking and Access Policy 20 3.6 Access vs Accessibility 21 3.7 Precedence of Access Rights Policy 21 3.8 Right to Access A Specific Roadway 22 3.9 Traffic Impact Analyses (TIA’s) 22 3.9.1 Level of Service (LOS) 22 3.9.2 Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Requirements
    [Show full text]
  • Town Standards Index (Select to View) • Collector Street Cross Section
    Town Standards Index (select to view) • Collector Street Cross Section - Standard #3.00 • Collector Street Cross Section w/ Bike Lanes - Standard #3.01 • Local Street Cross Section - Standard #3.02 • Local Street Cross Section (No Curb) - Standard #3.03 • Industrial Street Cross Section - Standard #3.04 • 4-Lane Divided Street Cross Section - Standard #3.05 • Alley Cross Section - Standard #3.06 • Greenway Asphalt Path Cross Section - Standard #3.07 • Utility Trench Pavement Repair - Standard #3.08 • Typical Pavement Repair - Standard #3.09 • Standard Driveway Turnout - Standard #3.12 • Standard Curb & Gutter - Standard #3.13 • Median Curb - Standard #3.14 • Rolled Curb - Standard #3.15 • Residential Cul-de-sac - Standard #3.16 • Barricade for Dead End Streets - Standard #3.17 • Standard Concrete Drop Inlet - Standard #4.10 • Standard Brick Drop Inlet - Standard #4.11 • Standard Drop Inlet Grates - Standard #4.12 • Standard Concrete Catch Basin - Standard #4.13A • Standard Concrete Catch Basin - Standard #4.13B • Standard Brick Catch Basin - Standard #4.14A • Standard Brick Catch Basin - Standard #4.14B • HDPE Pipe - Standard #4.16 • Trench Installation for HDPE - Standard #4.16A • Polypropylene Pipe - Standard #4.17 • Trench Installation for Polypropylene - Standard #4.17A • Dissimilar Pipe Connections to RCP - Standard #4.18 • Curb Ramps - Standard #5.00 • Curb Ramps - New Development - Standard #5.01 • Curb Ramps - New Development - Standard #5.02 • Curb Ramps - New Development - Standard #5.03 • Curb Ramps - Retrofit - Standard #5.04
    [Show full text]
  • Extruded Brick Product Profile
    PRODUCT PROFILE Revised 1/2019 Glen-Gery Extruded Brick General Glen-Gery manufactures many sizes of extruded bricks in a multitude of shades and textures to accommodate the visual requirements of most projects. The more popular extruded bricks have a nominal four inch bed depth. These extruded units are often referred to as cored, stiff mud, or wirecut bricks. To differentiate between wirecut bricks and wirecut finishes, Glen-Gery refers to the wirecut finish as a velour texture. Unit Specifications Glen-Gery extruded bricks are typically manufactured to conform to the requirements of American Society for Brick Positions in a Wall Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Specification C 216, Grade SW, Type FBS and all grades of ASTM C 62. In Stretcher Rowlock some instances brick are manufactured to conform to ASTM C652 which includes increased core volume. These products also conform to the requirements of ASTM C 216, Grade MW. Certain Header products meet the requirements of ASTM C 216, Type FBX, ASTM C 902, ASTM C 652, or ASTM C 32. Inquiries should be made for specific applications or conformance to standards other than ASTM C 216 or C 62. When specifying this product, the specifications should cite: Soldier 1) The product name and state “as manufactured by Glen-Gery Corporation.” Sailor Rowlock Stretcher 2) Conformance to the requirements of the appropriate standard, (typically, ASTM C 216 or C652). 3) The actual unit dimensions listed as thickness x height x length. Example: Glenrose Battlefield as manu - factured by Glen-Gery Corporation to conform to the requirements of ASTM C 216, Grade SW, Type FBS.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Design Geometrics and Criteria
    Topic #625-000-007 Plans Preparation Manual, Volume 1 January 1, 2017 Chapter 2 Design Geometrics and Criteria 2.0 General ...................................................................................... 2-1 2.0.1 Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Near or Within Project Limits ............................................................. 2-3 2.1 Lanes ......................................................................................... 2-4 2.1.1 Travel Lanes and Auxiliary Lanes............................... 2-4 2.1.2 Other Lane Widths ..................................................... 2-5 2.1.3 Ramp Traveled Way Widths ....................................... 2-6 2.1.4 Pedestrian, Bicycle and Public Transit Facilities ......... 2-6 2.1.4.1 Pedestrian Facilities ................................... 2-6 2.1.4.2 Bicycle Facilities ......................................... 2-7 2.1.4.3 Public Transit Facilities ............................... 2-7 2.1.5 Cross Slopes .............................................................. 2-7 2.1.5.1 Hydroplaning Risk Analysis ........................ 2-8 2.1.6 Roadway Pavement ................................................. 2-11 2.1.6.1 Alternative Roadway Paving Treatments ............................................... 2-11 2.1.6.2 Maintenance Memorandum of Agreement Requirements for Patterned Pavement ................................. 2-13 2.1.7 Transitions of Pavement Widths ............................... 2-15 2.1.8 Number of Lanes on the State Highway System ...... 2-15 2.2 Medians ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1017 Wealthy Street Grand Rapids, MI (616) 719-2409 Brickroad Pizza.Com 3 Pm - 9 Pm Tuesday-Friday 11 Am - 9 Pm Saturday - Sunday Closed Monday
    1017 Wealthy Street Grand Rapids, MI (616) 719-2409 brickroad pizza.com 3 pm - 9 pm Tuesday-Friday 11 am - 9 pm Saturday - Sunday Closed Monday ––––CHIC–AGO– DEE–P DIS–H PI–ZZA –––––BU–ILD –YOUR– OWN– PIZ–ZA ––– ALL DEEP DISH PIZZAS COME WITH OUR HOMEMADE SAUCE, PREMIUM CRUST, EACH HAND TOSSED PIZZA COMES WITH OUR HOUSE SAUCE AND CHEESE BLEND. ––AN–D OUR– CHEE–SE BLE–ND. A–VAILA–BLE IN– 12" ON–LY, SE–RVES –4 PEO–PLE! – –––YOU– CAN– ADD A–S MAN–Y ITE–MS AS– YOU L–IKE, TO– CREA–TE A –– AVERAGE COOK TIME IS 45 MIN, BUT IT CAN VARY ! OUR SUGGESTED COMBOS: PIZZA ADVENTURE OF YOUR OWN. THIN CRUST AVAILABLE IN ALL SIZES. THE BRICK ROAD PIZZA FOR ALL THE TURKEy FANS...FRESH TURKEy SAUSAGE, TURKEy PEPPERONI, CHOOSE YOUR SIZE SMOKED TURKEy, RED ONIONS, MUSHROOMS, AND GREEN PEPPERS...$30.50 9" – 1 ITEM...$8.50 2 ITEM...$9.50 3 ITEM...$11.50 EACH ADD ITEM 75¢ HARD CORE VEGGIE 12 "– 1 ITEM...$12.50 2 ITEM...$14.50 3 ITEM...$16.50 EACH ADD ITEM $1.00 ROASTED RED PEPPERS, RED ONIONS, ZUCCHINI, ARTICHOKES, TOMATOES, 16" – 1 ITEM...$17.50 2 ITEM...$19.50 3 ITEM...$21.50 EACH ADD ITEM $1.25 BLACK OLIVES AND SPINACH...$28.50 BUILD YOUR OWN DEEP DISH CHOOSE YOUR SAUCE THERE IS A 3 TOPPING MINIMUM ON CUSTOM DEEP DISHES. WE WANT TO SERVE THE BEST PIZZA WE CAN OFFER. WITH HOUSE SAUCE, CHEESE, AND 3 TOPPINGS... $27.50 EACH HAND TOSSED PIZZA COMES WITH OUR HOUSE SAUCE, OR CHOOSE ONE OF THESE TASTy CHOICES EACH ADDITIONAL ITEM...$2.50...SEE OUR TOPPING LIST HERBED BUTTER, ALFREDO , RICOTTA, BBQ, PEST O ** CONTAINS NUTS 9" ..
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Historic Brick Streets
    Acknowledgments T his puhli c1tion W8S made possible hy an Historic Preservation Ed ucarion G rant from Hisroric Landmark s Foundation of Indiana, the Indiana Hum,miries Counc il and the Narion81 Endowment for the Humanities. Durable Goods: HI5lORJC LA"ID,\NIRKS FOUNDATION OF INDIANA Indiana Humanities Council In partnership with the National Endowment for the Humanities . ,. 1, . '\00 .. , . " , Published by: (photo courtesy of Martin Blakley) West Central Neigh borhood Associatio n PO. Box 13151 Fort Way ne, Indiana 46867 -3151 (260) 385-9378 c C) \V IV W. wcstcentra lne ighborh ood.org w Restoring ~ < l0 ""r-­ Historic Brick ~ '-0 ...2 CX) '-0 '" -q­ ..£....c c::." 'vtJ1J -eG Streets z ~ C ARCH, Inc. l0 ~ c;~17 43 7 E. Berry Sr. t:: ...--. c: E1'l9\ Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802 ~ x ;; (260) 426 -5117 U dS:3 ARCH~ .-_....__... ._. " . w\Vw.archfw . ( ) I }~ .. , .... '''~' .... CI' 0. (.;OtTImonllY Heftlage 0 :3o..:LL~ ~ rst step towa rL1 restoring a brick street to its prop­ A nother way to get sa lvaged l)[[cks at little or no cost The Benefits er integrity is to conduct a survey of the overall condi­ is to be aware of utility work be ing do ne o n concrete tions of the street, curbs and guttering. It may be that o r asphalt streets. Sometimes excavati on work is of more than JU St the street needs to be repa ired and a requ ired, a nd if below the paved surface is a n old brick comprehensive repair of street, the pavers wi ll be dug out a long with the rest of Restoring Brick Streets all elements needs to he the street.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Cycle Analysis of Transport Modes
    Final report (Volume II) Project code 2011UD02 Life cycle analysis of transport modes Final report Volume II – Summary of literature reviews and primary questionnaires used for data collection Prepared for National Transport Development Policy Committee (NTDPC) Life cycle analysis of transport modes (Volume II) © The Energy and Resources Institute 2012 Suggested format for citation T E R I. 2012 Final report - Life cycle analysis of transport modes (Volume II) New Delhi: The Energy and Resources Institute. 124pp. [Project code 2011UD02] For more information Akshima T Ghate T E R I Tel. 2468 2100 or 2468 2111 Darbari Seth Block E-mail [email protected] IHC Complex, Lodhi Road Fax 2468 2144 or 2468 2145 New Delhi – 110 003 Web www.teriin.org India India +91 • Delhi (0)11 Life cycle analysis of transport modes (Volume II) Table of contents ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................ V ADVISORY GROUP FOR THE STUDY ............................................................................................ IX TERI PROJECT TEAM ..................................................................................................................... X 1. LITERATURE REVIEW: CONSTRUCTION OF TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE ........................ 1 1.1 Upstream impacts of construction – Material production and transportation ........ 2 1.2 Road construction (National Highways and urban roads) ........................................ 6 1.3 Construction of Bus Rapid
    [Show full text]
  • Brick Streets Plan
    BRICK STREETS PLAN City of Rock Island Community & Economic Development Department Planning & Redevelopment Division Rock Island Preservation Commission Adopted 1988 by Rock Island City Council Amended: March 28, 2005 April 10, 2000 May 12, 1997 September 14, 1992 Rock Island.....Preserving the Past, Dedicated to the Future. TABLE of CONTENTS Executive Summary................................................................................................3 Prioritization List ......................................................................................................5 Map of Brick Streets ................................................................................................6 Methodology ..............................................................................................................9 History of Brick Street Construction in Rock Island....................................10 Condition of Brick Streets......................................................................................13 Utilities and Brick Streets.....................................................................................17 Street Standards .......................................................................................................18 Owner-Occupancy Along Brick Streets...........................................................20 Architectural Integrity Along Brick Streets...................................................22 Recommendations to Preserve Rock Island=s Brick Streets......................25 Brick Streets Repair
    [Show full text]
  • Crossing Signs with Rrfbs Enhanced Crosswalk Markings Brick
    Brick Wayfinding Pillar Enhanced Crosswalk Markings SUMMER 2017 13 10’ 1.5’ • Brick pillar with gray integral color concrete cap and base; concrete frost footing • Preformed thermoplastic graphic panel overlay or white paint stencil applied to integral color concrete • Signature color gradient pattern using Adel dark brown and red bricks, and an additional buff color brick • High-contrast brick pattern references local brick streets and provides a highly visible graphic crossing • Metal sign panels indicate direction and distance to local and regional destinations; could be color-coded per destination • Combined with refuge islands at raised medians on South Gateway School Crossings type (trails, parks, culture and history, shopping, entertainment, etc.) • Crossing dimensions, layout, and pavement marking materials conform to Federal Highway Administration Manual on • Three locations are proposed along the RRVT corridor, but the wayfinding pillar could be replicated throughout Adel parks Uniform Traffic Devices (MUTCD) and trails system Brick Gateway Monuments Crossing Signs with RRFBs 6’ 4’ 2.5’ 1.5’ 6’ 1.5’ 6’ 1.5’ 6’ • Brick monuments of varying heights with gray integral color concrete cap and base; shallow concrete spread footing • Double-sided, 14’ tall bike / pedestrian crossing sign posts with push button-activated RRFB lights proposed at each side of • Signature color gradient pattern using Adel dark brown and red bricks, and an additional buff color brick a crossing and on a center median if applicable • To be installed in a
    [Show full text]