Attachment 2 a Risk Profile of Dairy Products in Australia Appendices 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Attachment 2 a Risk Profile of Dairy Products in Australia Appendices 1 2-06 22 March 2006 Attachment 2 A Risk Profile of Dairy Products in Australia Appendices 1-6 DRAFT ASSESSMENT REPORT PROPOSAL P296 PRIMARY PRODUCTION AND PROCESSING STANDARD FOR DAIRY RISK PROFILE OF DAIRY PRODUCTS IN AUSTRALIA VII APPENDICES 1. IMPACT OF PROCESSING ON DAIRY PRODUCT SAFETY 1.1 Milk and cream 1.2 Cheese 1.3 Dried milk powders 1.4 Infant formulae 1.5 Concentrated milk products 1.6 Butter and butter products 1.7 Ice cream 1.8 Cultured and fermented milk products 1.9 Dairy desserts 1.10 Dairy based dips 1.11 Casein, why products and other functional milk derivatives 1.12 Colostrum 2. EPIDEMIOLOGICAL INFORMATION ON OUTBREAKS OF FOODBORNE ILLNESS ASSOCIATED WITH DAIRY PRODUCTS 3. OCCURRENCE OF MICROBIOLOGICAL HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH DAIRY PRODUCTS 4. CONSUMPTION FIGURES OF DAIRY PRODUCTS FOR AUSTRALIAN CONSUMERS 5. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION/HAZARD CHARACTERISATION OF PATHOGENS 5.1 Aeromonas Spp. 5.2 Bacillus cereus 5.3 Brucella Spp. 5.4 Campylobacter jejuni/coli 5.5 Clostridium Spp. 5.6 Coxiella burnetii 5.7 Corynebacterium ulcerans 5.8 Cryptosporidium 5.9 Enterobacter sakazakii 5.10 Pathogenic Escherichia coli 5.11 Listeria monocytogenes 5.12 Mycobacterium bovis 5.13 Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis 5.14 Salmonella Spp. 5.15 Shigella Spp. 5.16 Staphylococcus aureus 5.17 Streptococcus Spp. 5.18 Yersinia enterocolitica 6. PREVIOUS RISK ASSESSMENTS ON MICROBIOLOGICAL PATHOGENS IN DAIRY PRODUCTS 7. CHEMICAL RISK ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK 8. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR AGRICULTURAL AND VETERINARY CHEMICALS 9. MAXIMUM RESIDUE LIMITS 10. CHEMICAL RESIDUES MEASURED IN BOVINE DAIRY PRODUCTS 11. REGISTERED ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS 12. REVIEW OF ANTIBIOTICS AND ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN AUSTRALIA 13. FEEDS AND FEED COMMODITIES FOR CATTLE 14. THERAPEUTIC PRODUCTS USED IN GOAT PRODUCTION AND REGISTRATION STATUS FOR USE IN GOATS 226 184 APPENDIX 1 Impact of processing on dairy product safety 1.1 Milk and cream 1.1.1 Description Milk is defined in Standard 2.5.1 of the Food Standards Code as “the mammary secretion of milking animals, obtained from one or more milkings for consumption as liquid milk or for further processing but excludes colostrums”. In this Dairy Risk Profile, milk refers to the fluid form of milk derived from cow, sheep, goats, buffaloes, camels, horses and other mammalian animals, and available for human consumption through retail sale in Australia. Milk may be sold in many forms, including whole milk, skim milk, low-fat milk, flavoured milk and other modified milks. Some of these products require the removal of the fat portion as cream. Under Standard 2.5.2, cream is defined as “a milk product comparatively rich in fat, in the form of an emulsion of fat-in-skim milk, which can be obtained by separation from milk”. Cream is produced from whole milk by skimming or other separation means. Milk is subjected to a range of processing operations before being sold. Typical processes include standardisation or formulation of milk, which may include: separation steps such as filtration, centrifugation, and sometimes clarification; homogenisation; and various forms of heat treatment such as thermisation, pasteurisation, sterilisation and UHT (ultra-high temperature) processing. The key processing operations are shown in Figure 1. Dairy animal husbandry Milking, cooling and refrigerated storage Transport to processing plant Milk receival and testing Cold storage Standardisation or formulation Homogenisation Homogenisation and pasteurisation and UHT Chilling Packaging and storage Distribution 185 Figure 1: Indicative processing of fluid milk and cream products Figure 1 simplifies the major steps in the processing of liquid milk products. The raw milk for low fat, skim milk and modified milk products is subjected to centrifugal separation to remove some of the fat phase. Flavoured milks have the addition of flavours and colouring agents, which are sometimes added post-pasteurisation, while ultra-high temperature processing (UHT) results in milk products which are shelf-stable and do not require refrigeration or chilling. The cream that is separated from whole milk may be used in the production of liquid cream products, butter, and anhydrous milk fat. The cream may be subjected to additional processes including vacuum pasteurisation, which involves heat treatment and deodorisation of the fat. 1.1.2 The Microbial Flora of Milk The microbial status of raw milk is influenced by various factors associated with milk production on farm. These factors impact on both the numbers of microorganisms present in raw milk and the type of bacterial flora. Generally, few bacteria are present in milk drawn from the udder of a healthy animal, but bacteria may enter milk if it is drawn from an infected animal or if it is contaminated by unhygienic milking practices and poor milk handling. Bramley and McKinnon (1990) identified the main groups of microorganisms comprising the microflora of raw milk as follows: Table 1: Major flora of raw milk Group Incidence (%) Micrococci e.g. Micrococcus, Staphylococcus 30-99% Streptococci e.g. Enterococcus 0-50% Asporogenous Gram +ve rods e.g. Corynebacterium, Microbacterium, etc <10 Gram –ve rods e.g. Klebsiella, Escherichia, Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, etc <10 Sporeformers e.g. Bacillus spores or vegetative cells <10 Miscellaneous e.g. Streptomycetes, yeasts, moulds, etc <10 Various pathogenic microorganisms may also be associated with raw milk. These include organisms shed by an infected animal (pathogens will predominate in milk from mastitic cows) or organisms that enter the milk from contaminated equipment and poor milking hygiene. Surveys of raw cow’s milk, mainly conducted overseas, have detected Aeromonas spp., B. cereus, Brucella spp., Campylobacter spp., Coxiella burnetii, pathogenic E. coli, L. monocytogenes, Mycobacterium spp., Salmonella spp., S. aureus, Streptococcus spp. and Y. enterocolitica. Raw goat’s and sheep milk have been shown to contain Aeromonas spp., Brucella spp., Campylobacter spp., pathogenic E. coli, L. monocytogenes, Mycobacterium spp., S. aureus and Y. enterocolitica. In Australian surveys, potential pathogens detected in raw cow’s milk have included Aeromonas spp. and S. aureus. Detections in raw goat’s milk have included E. coli, L. monocytogenes, and Y. enterocolitica (Appendix 3). 186 Overseas surveys of cream have detected Aeromonas spp. and Shigella spp., while Australian surveys have indicated the presence of E. coli and Salmonella spp. (Appendix 3). 1.1.3 Effect of milk processing on the growth and survival of microbial pathogens To minimise microbiological activity, raw milk harvested from animals at dairy farms is cooled rapidly to temperatures of 7°C or lower within 2 hours of milking (White, 2003). In Australia, milk is cooled to 4°C. After a period of storage on farm, raw milk is transported by insulated bulk milk tankers to milk processing facilities. Traditionally, milk transportation was conducted in the early part of the day to minimise the impact of heat from sunlight, but nowadays milk collection may occur at any time during the day or night and insulated tankers minimise the impact of ambient temperatures on milk. When the raw milk reaches the processing plant, it is sampled and its status assessed by measuring parameters such as temperature, presence of antibiotics, somatic cell counts, standard plate count, bactoscan, fat content, etc. Information on the microbial content of milk is helpful in judging its sanitary quality and the conditions of production, and is used in payment schemes that reward producers of high quality raw milk. The raw milk is normally transferred to large insulated storage silos and maintained at temperatures of less than 4°C before decisions are made about how it will be processed. Milk for drinking is usually homogenised, a process where the milk fat globules are physically reduced in size and then remain in suspension throughout the milk for long periods of time. In unhomogenised milk, fat globules may coalesce to form a compact cream layer. Homogenisation has little effect on the microbiology of fluid milk, but may predispose the fat to oxidation reactions that affect its quality, hence homogenisation occurs simultaneously with pasteurisation. Practically all drinking milk in Australia is homogenised, preventing the milk from separating and giving it a more uniform colour. Pasteurisation involves heat treatment of milk with the aim of ensuring a microbiological safe product, as well as to extend the shelf-life during refrigerated storage. Milk pasteurisation may be carried out either as a batch holding heat treatment or a high-temperature-short-time (HTST) heat treatment. The batch process involves low-temperature-holding for 30 minutes or longer at temperatures of approximately 63°C. This has been largely replaced by HTST treatment at temperatures of ≥72°C for at least 15 seconds. The Food Standards Code states: Milk must be pasteurised by: (a) heating to a temperature of no less than 72°C and retaining at such temperature for no less than 15 seconds and immediately shock cooling to a temperature of 4.5°C; or (b) heating using any other time and temperature combination of equal or greater lethal effect on bacteria;Where dairy products contain elevated levels of fat or solids, the specified temperature is increased to compensate for the protective effect of these fat and solids on microorganisms. These specifications are sufficient to reduce populations of vegetative bacterial pathogens to a level considered safe for public health. The pasteurisation process used by processors of milk often employs temperatures and times in excess of 72°C for 15 seconds. This is to provide a higher margin of safety and to extend the shelf-life of liquid milk. 187 From survey data on industry pasteurisation practices in Australia HTST treatment of milk for liquid milk products was mostly in the range of 74-78°C for 15-30 seconds1. Pasteurisation processes for cream products utilise higher temperatures because of the protective effects of fat on microorganisms. From survey data on industry pasteurisation practices in Australia the pasteurisation temperatures and times for table cream varied in the range from 75-80°C for 20-30 seconds2.
Recommended publications
  • ID 2 | Issue No: 4.1 | Issue Date: 29.10.14 | Page: 1 of 24 © Crown Copyright 2014 Identification of Corynebacterium Species
    UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations Identification of Corynebacterium species Issued by the Standards Unit, Microbiology Services, PHE Bacteriology – Identification | ID 2 | Issue no: 4.1 | Issue date: 29.10.14 | Page: 1 of 24 © Crown copyright 2014 Identification of Corynebacterium species Acknowledgments UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations (SMIs) are developed under the auspices of Public Health England (PHE) working in partnership with the National Health Service (NHS), Public Health Wales and with the professional organisations whose logos are displayed below and listed on the website https://www.gov.uk/uk- standards-for-microbiology-investigations-smi-quality-and-consistency-in-clinical- laboratories. SMIs are developed, reviewed and revised by various working groups which are overseen by a steering committee (see https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/standards-for-microbiology-investigations- steering-committee). The contributions of many individuals in clinical, specialist and reference laboratories who have provided information and comments during the development of this document are acknowledged. We are grateful to the Medical Editors for editing the medical content. For further information please contact us at: Standards Unit Microbiology Services Public Health England 61 Colindale Avenue London NW9 5EQ E-mail: [email protected] Website: https://www.gov.uk/uk-standards-for-microbiology-investigations-smi-quality- and-consistency-in-clinical-laboratories UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations are produced in association with: Logos correct at time of publishing. Bacteriology – Identification | ID 2 | Issue no: 4.1 | Issue date: 29.10.14 | Page: 2 of 24 UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations | Issued by the Standards Unit, Public Health England Identification of Corynebacterium species Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NGS-Based Phylogeny of Diphtheria-Related Pathogenicity Factors in Different Corynebacterium Spp
    Dangel et al. BMC Microbiology (2019) 19:28 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-019-1402-1 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access NGS-based phylogeny of diphtheria-related pathogenicity factors in different Corynebacterium spp. implies species- specific virulence transmission Alexandra Dangel1* , Anja Berger1,2*, Regina Konrad1 and Andreas Sing1,2 Abstract Background: Diphtheria toxin (DT) is produced by toxigenic strains of the human pathogen Corynebacterium diphtheriae as well as zoonotic C. ulcerans and C. pseudotuberculosis. Toxigenic strains may cause severe respiratory diphtheria, myocarditis, neurological damage or cutaneous diphtheria. The DT encoding tox gene is located in a mobile genomic region and tox variability between C. diphtheriae and C. ulcerans has been postulated based on sequences of a few isolates. In contrast, species-specific sequence analysis of the diphtheria toxin repressor gene (dtxR), occurring both in toxigenic and non-toxigenic Corynebacterium species, has not been done yet. We used whole genome sequencing data from 91 toxigenic and 46 non-toxigenic isolates of different pathogenic Corynebacterium species of animal or human origin to elucidate differences in extracted DT, DtxR and tox-surrounding genetic elements by a phylogenetic analysis in a large sample set. Results: Sequences of both DT and DtxR, extracted from whole genome sequencing data, could be classified in four distinct, nearly species-specific clades, corresponding to C. diphtheriae, C. pseudotuberculosis, C. ulcerans and atypical C. ulcerans from a non-toxigenic toxin gene-bearing wildlife cluster. Average amino acid similarities were above 99% for DT and DtxR within the four groups, but lower between them. For DT, subgroups below species level could be identified, correlating with different tox-comprising mobile genetic elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Envelope of Corynebacteria: Structure and Influence on Pathogenicity
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation ISRN Microbiology Volume 2013, Article ID 935736, 11 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/935736 Review Article Cell Envelope of Corynebacteria: Structure and Influence on Pathogenicity Andreas Burkovski Lehrstuhl fur¨ Mikrobiologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat¨ Erlangen-Nurnberg,¨ Staudtstre 5, 91058 Erlangen, Germany Correspondence should be addressed to Andreas Burkovski; [email protected] Received 2 December 2012; Accepted 31 December 2012 Academic Editors: S. H. Flint, G. Koraimann, and T. Krishnan Copyright © 2013 Andreas Burkovski. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To date the genus Corynebacterium comprises 88 species. More than half of these are connected to human and animal infections, with the most prominent member of the pathogenic species being Corynebacterium diphtheriae, which is also the type species of the genus. Corynebacterium species are characterized by a complex cell wall architecture: the plasma membrane of these bacteria is followed by a peptidoglycan layer, which itself is covalently linked to a polymer of arabinogalactan. Bound to this, an outer layer of mycolic acids is found which is functionally equivalent to the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. As final layer, free polysaccharides, glycolipids, and proteins are found. The composition of the different substructures of the corynebacterial cell envelope and their influence on pathogenicity are discussed in this paper. 1. The Genus Corynebacterium Based on their medical importance as etiological agent of diphtheria and their enormous biotechnological potential, The genus Corynebacterium belongs to the class of Acti- C.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Corynebacterium Species in Macaques
    Journal of Medical Microbiology (2012), 61, 1401–1408 DOI 10.1099/jmm.0.045377-0 Characterization of Corynebacterium species in macaques Jaime Venezia,1 Pamela K. Cassiday,2 Robert P. Marini,1 Zeli Shen,1 Ellen M. Buckley,1 Yaicha Peters,1 Nancy Taylor,1 Floyd E. Dewhirst,3,4 Maria L. Tondella2 and James G. Fox1 Correspondence 1Division of Comparative Medicine, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, James G. Fox 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA [email protected] 2Division of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA 3Department of Molecular Genetics, The Forsyth Institute, 245 First Street, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA 4Department of Oral Medicine, Infection and Immunity, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA Bacteria of the genus Corynebacterium are important primary and opportunistic pathogens. Many are zoonotic agents. In this report, phenotypic (API Coryne analysis), genetic (rpoB and 16S rRNA gene sequencing), and physical methods (MS) were used to distinguish the closely related diphtheroid species Corynebacterium ulcerans and Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis, and to definitively diagnose Corynebacterium renale from cephalic implants of rhesus (Macaca mulatta) and cynomolgus (Macaca fascicularis) macaques used in cognitive neuroscience research. Throat and cephalic implant cultures yielded 85 isolates from 43 macaques. Identification by API Coryne yielded C. ulcerans (n574), Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis (n52), C. renale or most closely related to C. renale (n53), and commensals and opportunists (n56). The two isolates identified as C. pseudotuberculosis by API Coryne required genetic and MS analysis for accurate characterization as C. ulcerans. Of three isolates identified as C.
    [Show full text]
  • Corynebacterium Rouxii Sp. Nov., a Novel Member of the Diphtheriae
    Corynebacterium rouxii sp. nov., a novel member of the diphtheriae species complex Edgar Badell, Melanie Hennart, Carla Rodrigues, Virginie Passet, Mélody Dazas, Valerie Bouchez, Leonardo Panunzi, Annick Carmi-Leroy, Julie Toubiana, Sylvain Brisse To cite this version: Edgar Badell, Melanie Hennart, Carla Rodrigues, Virginie Passet, Mélody Dazas, et al.. Corynebac- terium rouxii sp. nov., a novel member of the diphtheriae species complex. Research in Microbiology, Elsevier, 2020, 171 (3-4), pp.122-127. 10.1016/j.resmic.2020.02.003. pasteur-02862963v2 HAL Id: pasteur-02862963 https://hal-pasteur.archives-ouvertes.fr/pasteur-02862963v2 Submitted on 18 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License Research in Microbiology 171 (2020) 122e127 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Research in Microbiology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/resmic Original Article Corynebacterium rouxii sp. nov., a novel member of the diphtheriae
    [Show full text]
  • Microorganisms
    microorganisms Review Zoonotic Diseases: Etiology, Impact, and Control Md. Tanvir Rahman 1,* , Md. Abdus Sobur 1 , Md. Saiful Islam 1 , Samina Ievy 1, Md. Jannat Hossain 1, Mohamed E. El Zowalaty 2,3, AMM Taufiquer Rahman 4 and Hossam M. Ashour 5,6,* 1 Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh; [email protected] (M.A.S.); [email protected] (M.S.I.); [email protected] (S.I.); [email protected] (M.J.H.) 2 Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah 27272, UAE; [email protected] 3 Zoonosis Science Center, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, SE 75123 Uppsala, Sweden 4 Adhunik Sadar Hospital, Naogaon 6500, Bangladesh; drtaufi[email protected] 5 Department of Integrative Biology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA 6 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo 11562, Egypt * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.T.R.); [email protected] (H.M.A.) Received: 12 August 2020; Accepted: 2 September 2020; Published: 12 September 2020 Abstract: Most humans are in contact with animals in a way or another. A zoonotic disease is a disease or infection that can be transmitted naturally from vertebrate animals to humans or from humans to vertebrate animals. More than 60% of human pathogens are zoonotic in origin. This includes a wide variety of bacteria, viruses, fungi, protozoa, parasites, and other pathogens. Factors such as climate change, urbanization, animal migration and trade, travel and tourism, vector biology, anthropogenic factors, and natural factors have greatly influenced the emergence, re-emergence, distribution, and patterns of zoonoses.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Analysis of Two Complete Corynebacterium Ulcerans
    Trost et al. BMC Genomics 2011, 12:383 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/12/383 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Comparative analysis of two complete Corynebacterium ulcerans genomes and detection of candidate virulence factors Eva Trost1,2, Arwa Al-Dilaimi1, Panagiotis Papavasiliou1, Jessica Schneider1,2,3, Prisca Viehoever4, Andreas Burkovski5, Siomar C Soares6, Sintia S Almeida6, Fernanda A Dorella6, Anderson Miyoshi6, Vasco Azevedo6, Maria P Schneider7, Artur Silva7, Cíntia S Santos8, Louisy S Santos8, Priscila Sabbadini8, Alexandre A Dias8, Raphael Hirata Jr8, Ana L Mattos-Guaraldi8 and Andreas Tauch1* Abstract Background: Corynebacterium ulcerans has been detected as a commensal in domestic and wild animals that may serve as reservoirs for zoonotic infections. During the last decade, the frequency and severity of human infections associated with C. ulcerans appear to be increasing in various countries. As the knowledge of genes contributing to the virulence of this bacterium was very limited, the complete genome sequences of two C. ulcerans strains detected in the metropolitan area of Rio de Janeiro were determined and characterized by comparative genomics: C. ulcerans 809 was initially isolated from an elderly woman with fatal pulmonary infection and C. ulcerans BR-AD22 was recovered from a nasal sample of an asymptomatic dog. Results: The circular chromosome of C. ulcerans 809 has a total size of 2,502,095 bp and encodes 2,182 predicted proteins, whereas the genome of C. ulcerans BR-AD22 is 104,279 bp larger and comprises 2,338 protein-coding regions. The minor difference in size of the two genomes is mainly caused by additional prophage-like elements in the C.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxigenic Corynebacterium Ulcerans in Woman And
    LETTERS shows insuffi cient coverage among Pierre Loulergue,1 potential for nosocomial outbreaks. Euro students currently being trained as Jean-Paul Guthmann,1 Surveill. 2011;16.pii 19764. 9. Gagneur A, Pinquier D. Early waning of HCPs in university hospitals within Laure Fonteneau, maternal measles antibodies: why im- the Paris area. Thus, all unvaccinated Jean-Baptiste Armengaud, munization programs should be adapted students (20.7%) and ≈5% of the 50% Daniel Levy-Brühl, over time. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. who have received 1 dose could be and Odile Launay 2010;8:1339–43. doi:10.1586/eri.10.126 10. Schmid K, Merkl K, Hiddemann-Koca susceptible to measles. Moreover, Author affi liations: Assistance Publique K, Drexler H. Obligatory occupation- a rather low proportion of students Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France (P. al health check increases vaccination knew that measles vaccination was Loulergue, J.B. Armengaud, O. Launay); rates among medical students. J Hosp Infect. 2008;70:71–5. doi:10.1016/j. recommended, as described for HCPs and Institut de Veille Sanitaire, Saint- jhin.2008.05.010 (7), which may explain the insuffi cient Maurice, France (J.-P. Guthmann, L. coverage. Fonteneau, D. Levy-Brühl) Address for correspondence: Pierre Loulergue, In France, this situation has DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1709.110141 CIC de Vaccinologie Cochin-Pasteur, 27, resulted in several measles outbreaks Rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014 Paris, within hospitals in recent years (8). References France; email: [email protected] Particular efforts should be made in certain units, such as pediatrics, 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoonoses and Communicable Diseases Common to Man and Animals
    ZOONOSES AND COMMUNICABLE DISEASES COMMON TO MAN AND ANIMALS Third Edition Volume I Bacterioses and Mycoses Scientific and Technical Publication No. 580 PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION Pan American Sanitary Bureau, Regional Office of the WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION 525 Twenty-third Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037 U.S.A. 2001 Also published in Spanish (2001) with the title: Zoonosis y enfermedades transmisibles comunes al hombre a los animales ISBN 92 75 31580 9 PAHO Cataloguing-in-Publication Pan American Health Organization Zoonoses and communicable diseases common to man and animals 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: PAHO, © 2001. 3 vol.—(Scientific and Technical Publication No. 580) ISBN 92 75 11580 X I. Title II. Series 1. ZOONOSES 2. BACTERIAL INFECTIONS AND MYCOSES 3. COMMUNICABLE DISEASE CONTROL 4. FOOD CONTAMINATION 5. PUBLIC HEALTH VETERINARY 6. DISEASE RESERVOIRS NLM WC950.P187 2001 En The Pan American Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. Applications and inquiries should be addressed to the Publications Program, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., U.S.A., which will be glad to provide the latest information on any changes made to the text, plans for new editions, and reprints and translations already available. ©Pan American Health Organization, 2001 Publications of the Pan American Health Organization enjoy copyright protection in accordance with the provisions of Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. All rights are reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the Pan American Health Organization concerning the status of any country, ter- ritory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 Diphtheria Toxoid Tejpratap S.P
    19 Diphtheria Toxoid Tejpratap S.P. Tiwari and Melinda Wharton Respiratory diphtheria is an acute communicable upper respi- Schick introduced a skin test for immunity that consisted of the ratory illness caused by toxigenic strains of Corynebacterium injection of a small, measured amount of diphtheria toxin; in diphtheriae, a Gram-positive bacillus. The illness is character- immune persons, circulating antibody neutralized the toxin, ized by a membranous inflammation of the upper respiratory and no local lesion was observed.2 The Schick skin test was tract, usually of the pharynx but sometimes of the posterior widely used to distinguish immune individuals and target nasal passages, larynx, and trachea, and by widespread damage immunization to those susceptible. In the early 1920s, Ramon to other organs, primarily the myocardium and peripheral showed that diphtheria toxin, when treated with heat and for- nerves. Extensive membrane production and organ damage malin, lost its toxic properties but retained its ability to produce are caused by local and systemic actions of a potent exotoxin serologic protection against the disease. Thus the current produced by toxigenic strains of C. diphtheriae. A cutaneous immunizing preparation, diphtheria toxoid, came into being.6 form of diphtheria commonly occurs in warmer climates or tropical countries. WHY THE DISEASE IS IMPORTANT HISTORY OF THE DISEASE Before the introduction of diphtheria immunization, diphthe- ria was a major cause of childhood mortality, and it remains Historical descriptions of
    [Show full text]
  • Corynebacterium Ulcerans Diphtheria: an Emerging Zoonosis in Brazil And
    Rev Saúde Pública 2011;45(6) Alexandre Alves de Souza de Oliveira DiasI Corynebacterium ulcerans Louisy Sanchez SantosII diphtheria: an emerging Priscila Soares SabbadiniIII zoonosis in Brazil and Cíntia Silva SantosIII worldwide Feliciano Correa Silva JuniorI Fátima NapoleãoIII Prescilla Emy NagaoIII Maria Helena Simões Villas- ABSTRACT BôasI The article is a literature review on the emergence of human infections caused III Raphael Hirata Junior by Corynebacterium ulcerans in many countries including Brazil. Articles in Medline/PubMed and SciELO databases published between 1926 and 2011 Ana Luíza Mattos GuaraldiIII were reviewed, as well as articles and reports of the Brazilian Ministry of Health. It is presented a fast, cost-effective and easy to perform screening test for the presumptive diagnosis of C. ulcerans and C. diphtheriae infections in most Brazilian public and private laboratories. C. ulcerans spread in many countries and recent isolation of this pathogen in Rio de Janeiro, southeastern Brazil, is a warning to clinicians, veterinarians, and microbiologists on the occurrence of zoonotic diphtheria and C. ulcerans dissemination in urban and rural areas of Brazil and/or Latin America. DESCRIPTORS: Corynebacterium Infections, epidemiology. Disease Reservoirs, veterinary. Zoonoses. Communicable Diseases, Emerging. Review. INTRODUCTION I Departamento de Imunologia. Instituto Diphtheria is a disease with acute evolution that shows local and systemic mani- Nacional de Controle e Controle de Qualidade em Saúde. Fundação Oswaldo festations. It remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality on different Cruz. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil continents, even in countries with child immunization programs.4,35,58,82,92 The classical forms of diphtheria are caused mainly by Corynebacterium diphthe- II Pós-Graduação em Ciências Médicas.
    [Show full text]
  • Corynebacterium Diphtheriae Proteome Adaptation to Cell Culture Medium and Serum
    proteomes Article Corynebacterium diphtheriae Proteome Adaptation to Cell Culture Medium and Serum Jens Möller 1,*, Fatemeh Nosratabadi 1, Luca Musella 1, Jörg Hofmann 2 and Andreas Burkovski 1 1 Microbiology Division, Department of Biology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany; [email protected] (F.N.); [email protected] (L.M.); [email protected] (A.B.) 2 Biochemistry Division, Department of Biology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-9131-85-28802 Abstract: Host-pathogen interactions are often studied in vitro using primary or immortal cell lines. This set-up avoids ethical problems of animal testing and has the additional advantage of lower costs. However, the influence of cell culture media on bacterial growth and metabolism is not considered or investigated in most cases. To address this question growth and proteome adaptation of Corynebacterium diphtheriae strain ISS3319 were investigated in this study. Bacteria were cultured in standard growth medium, cell culture medium, and fetal calf serum. Mass spectrometric analyses and label-free protein quantification hint at an increased bacterial pathogenicity when grown in cell culture medium as well as an influence of the growth medium on the cell envelope. Keywords: diphtheria; host-pathogen interaction; label-free quantification; metabolic pathway; proteomics Citation: Möller, J.; Nosratabadi, F.; Musella, L.; Hofmann, J.; Burkovski, A. Corynebacterium diphtheriae 1. Introduction Proteome Adaptation to Cell Culture Medium and Serum. Proteomes 2021, Corynebacterium diphtheriae is a gram-positive, non-motile, facultative anaerobe bac- 9, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ terium [1] which may lead to severe infections in humans.
    [Show full text]