DOCSLIB.ORG

Benthic Subtidal and Intertidal Ecology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Benthic Subtidal and Intertidal Ecology MARINE ENERGY WALES MARINE ENERGY TEST AREA (META) Environmental Impact Assessment Chapter 7: Benthic Subtidal and Intertidal Ecology EOR0730 Marine Energy Test Area Rev: 03 May 29, 2019 rpsgroup.com Document Status Version Date Authored by Reviewed by Approved by Review date Rev00 12/02/19 AP RDS RDS 13/02/19 Rev01 15/02/19 AP JK JK 18/02/19 Rev01a 25/02/19 AP RDS RDS 03/04/19 Rev02 15/05/19 AP RDS RDS 15/04/19 Rev02A 19/05/19 AP RDS RDS 30/04/19 Rev03 21/05/19 AP RDS RDS 28/05/19 Approval for issue Jessica Hooper 2019-05-29 This report was prepared by RPS Energy Ltd. (‘RPS’) within the terms of its engagement and in direct response to a scope of services. This report is strictly limited to the purpose and the facts and matters stated in it and does not apply directly or indirectly and must not be used for any other application, purpose, use or matter. In preparing the report, RPS may have relied upon information provided to it at the time by other parties. RPS accepts no responsibility as to the accuracy or completeness of information provided by those parties at the time of preparing the report. The report does not take into account any changes in information that may have occurred since the publication of the report. If the information relied upon is subsequently determined to be false, inaccurate or incomplete then it is possible that the observations and conclusions expressed in the report may have changed. RPS does not warrant the contents of this report and shall not assume any responsibility or liability for loss whatsoever to any third party caused by, related to or arising out of any use or reliance on the report howsoever. No part of this report, its attachments or appendices may be reproduced by any process without the written consent of RPS. All enquiries should be directed to RPS. Prepared by: Prepared for: RPS Energy Ltd. Marine Energy Wales EOR0730 | Marine Energy Test Area | Rev: 03 | May 29, 2019 rpsgroup.com Page i Table of Tables Table of Contents Table 7.1: Summary of NPS EN-1 policy framework provisions relevant to benthic subtidal and intertidal 7. BENTHIC SUBTIDAL AND INTERTIDAL ECOLOGY ......................................................... 1 ecology…………….. ........................................................................................................................... 1 7.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 Table 7.2: Summary of NPS EN-3 policy framework provisions relevant to benthic subtidal and intertidal 7.2 Purpose of this chapter ...................................................................................................... 1 ecology…………….. ............................................................................................................ ………….2 7.3 Study area ......................................................................................................................... 1 Table 7.3: Summary of key consultation issues raised during consultation activities undertaken for the 7.4 Policy context .................................................................................................................... 1 META project relevant to benthic subtidal and intertidal ecology. ........................................................ 6 7.4.1 National Policy Statements ................................................................................... 1 Table 7.4: Summary of key desktop reports. ....................................................................................... 9 7.4.2 Other relevant policies .......................................................................................... 3 Table 7.5: Designated sites and relevant qualifying interest features for the META project benthic 7.5 Consultation ...................................................................................................................... 5 subtidal and intertidal ecology chapter.............................................................................................. 22 7.6 Methodology to inform the baseline .................................................................................... 9 Table 7.6: Valued Ecological Receptors categorisation for benthic subtidal and intertidal ecology. ..... 22 7.6.2 Desktop study ....................................................................................................... 9 Table 7.7: Benthic subtidal and intertidal ecology VERs in the benthic subtidal and intertidal ecology 7.6.3 Site specific surveys ........................................................................................... 10 study area…………… ...................................................................................................................... 24 7.7 Baseline environment ....................................................................................................... 10 Table 7.8: Maximum and most likely design scenarios considered for the assessment of potential 7.7.2 Subtidal benthic ecology ..................................................................................... 11 impacts on benthic subtidal and intertidal ecology. ........................................................................... 27 7.7.3 Sediment contamination ...................................................................................... 18 Table 7.9: Impacts scoped out of the assessment for benthic subtidal and intertidal ecology. ............ 32 7.7.4 Intertidal benthic ecology .................................................................................... 18 Table 7.10: Definition of terms relating to the magnitude of an impact. .............................................. 32 7.7.5 Designated sites ................................................................................................. 22 Table 7.11: Definition of terms relating to the sensitivity of the receptor. ........................................... 33 7.7.6 Valued Ecological Receptors ............................................................................... 22 Table 7.12: Matrix used for the assessment of the significance of the effect. ..................................... 33 7.7.7 Future baseline scenario ..................................................................................... 26 Table 7.13: Designed-in measures adopted as part of the META project. .......................................... 34 7.7.8 Data limitations ................................................................................................... 26 Table 7.14: List of other projects and plans considered within the CIA for benthic subtidal and intertidal 7.8 Key parameters for assessment ....................................................................................... 26 ecology………………. ...................................................................................................................... 55 7.8.1 Maximum and most likely design scenario ........................................................... 26 Table 7.15: Summary of potential environment effects, mitigation and monitoring at the META 7.8.2 Impacts scoped out of the assessment ................................................................ 26 project…………….. .......................................................................................................................... 63 7.9 Impact assessment methodology ...................................................................................... 32 7.9.1 Overview ............................................................................................................ 32 Table of Figures 7.9.2 Impact assessment criteria .................................................................................. 32 7.9.3 Designated sites ................................................................................................. 33 Figure 7.1: The benthic subtidal and intertidal ecology study area and designated sites with relevant 7.10 Measures adopted as part of the META Project ................................................................ 34 benthic ecology features. ................................................................................................................... 4 7.11 Assessment of significance .............................................................................................. 34 Figure 7.2: Annex I designated habitats of the Pembrokeshire Marine SAC. ...................................... 12 7.11.1 Installation phase .............................................................................................. 34 Figure 7.3: Distribution of maerl and seagrass beds in the Waterway. ............................................... 14 7.11.2 Operation and maintenance phase .................................................................... 45 Figure 7.4: Annex I habitats of the Pembrokeshire Marine SAC overlapping within each of the META 7.11.3 Decommissioning phase ................................................................................... 53 sites…………… ............................................................................................................................... 17 7.12 Cumulative Impact Assessment ........................................................................................ 54 Figure 7.5: Intertidal habitats within the benthic subtidal and intertidal ecology study area, as mapped 7.12.1 Methodology ....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Revised Essd-2020-161 (20 September 2020)
    1 1 Half-hourly changes in intertidal temperature at nine wave-exposed 2 locations along the Atlantic Canadian coast: a 5.5-year study 3 Ricardo A. Scrosati, Julius A. Ellrich, Matthew J. Freeman 4 Department of Biology, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia B2G 2W5, Canada 5 Correspondence to: Ricardo A. Scrosati ([email protected]) 6 Abstract. Intertidal habitats are unique because they spend alternating periods of 7 submergence (at high tide) and emergence (at low tide) every day. Thus, intertidal temperature 8 is mainly driven by sea surface temperature (SST) during high tides and by air temperature 9 during low tides. Because of that, the switch from high to low tides and viceversa can determine 10 rapid changes in intertidal thermal conditions. On cold-temperate shores, which are 11 characterized by cold winters and warm summers, intertidal thermal conditions can also change 12 considerably with seasons. Despite this uniqueness, knowledge on intertidal temperature 13 dynamics is more limited than for open seas. This is especially true for wave-exposed intertidal 14 habitats, which, in addition to the unique properties described above, are also characterized by 15 wave splash being able to moderate intertidal thermal extremes during low tides. To address this 16 knowledge gap, we measured temperature every half hour during a period of 5.5 years (2014- 17 2019) at nine wave-exposed rocky intertidal locations along the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia, 18 Canada. This data set is freely available from the figshare online repository (Scrosati and 19 Ellrich, 2020a; https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12462065.v1).
    [Show full text]
  • PROTISTS Shore and the Waves Are Large, Often the Largest of a Storm Event, and with a Long Period
    (seas), and these waves can mobilize boulders. During this phase of the storm the rapid changes in current direction caused by these large, short-period waves generate high accelerative forces, and it is these forces that ultimately can move even large boulders. Traditionally, most rocky-intertidal ecological stud- ies have been conducted on rocky platforms where the substrate is composed of stable basement rock. Projec- tiles tend to be uncommon in these types of habitats, and damage from projectiles is usually light. Perhaps for this reason the role of projectiles in intertidal ecology has received little attention. Boulder-fi eld intertidal zones are as common as, if not more common than, rock plat- forms. In boulder fi elds, projectiles are abundant, and the evidence of damage due to projectiles is obvious. Here projectiles may be one of the most important defi ning physical forces in the habitat. SEE ALSO THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES Geology, Coastal / Habitat Alteration / Hydrodynamic Forces / Wave Exposure FURTHER READING Carstens. T. 1968. Wave forces on boundaries and submerged bodies. Sarsia FIGURE 6 The intertidal zone on the north side of Cape Blanco, 34: 37–60. Oregon. The large, smooth boulders are made of serpentine, while Dayton, P. K. 1971. Competition, disturbance, and community organi- the surrounding rock from which the intertidal platform is formed zation: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky is sandstone. The smooth boulders are from a source outside the intertidal community. Ecological Monographs 45: 137–159. intertidal zone and were carried into the intertidal zone by waves. Levin, S. A., and R.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Report for Gulf of the Farallones and Cordell
    Chapter 6 Responses in Marine Habitats Sea Level Rise: Intertidal organisms will respond to sea level rise by shifting their distributions to keep pace with rising sea level. It has been suggested that all but the slowest growing organisms will be able to keep pace with rising sea level (Harley et al. 2006) but few studies have thoroughly examined this phenomenon. As in soft sediment systems, the ability of intertidal organisms to migrate will depend on available upland habitat. If these communities are adjacent to steep coastal bluffs it is unclear if they will be able to colonize this habitat. Further, increased erosion and sedimentation may impede their ability to move. Waves: Greater wave activity (see 3.3.2 Waves) suggests that intertidal and subtidal organisms may experience greater physical forces. A number of studies indicate that the strength of organisms does not always scale with their size (Denny et al. 1985; Carrington 1990; Gaylord et al. 1994; Denny and Kitzes 2005; Gaylord et al. 2008), which can lead to selective removal of larger organisms, influencing size structure and species interactions that depend on size. However, the relationship between offshore significant wave height and hydrodynamic force is not simple. Although local wave height inside the surf zone is a good predictor of wave velocity and force (Gaylord 1999, 2000), the relationship between offshore Hs and intertidal force cannot be expressed via a simple linear relationship (Helmuth and Denny 2003). In many cases (89% of sites examined), elevated offshore wave activity increased force up to a point (Hs > 2-2.5 m), after which force did not increase with wave height.
    [Show full text]
  • Topographic Complexity and Landscape Temperature Patterns Create a Dynamic Habitat Structure on a Rocky Intertidal Shore
    Vol. 428: 1–12, 2011 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published May 3 doi: 10.3354/meps09124 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS FEATURE ARTICLE Topographic complexity and landscape temperature patterns create a dynamic habitat structure on a rocky intertidal shore Justin J. Meager*, Thomas A. Schlacher, Mahdi Green Faculty of Science, Health and Education, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, Queensland 4558, Australia ABSTRACT: Habitat complexity is a fundamental dri- ver of ecosystem structure and function. Rocky inter- tidal shores are the classic model system for investi - gating theoretical and mechanistic models of habitat complexity, because the structural topography is largely biologically independent and stable over time. In the present study, we investigate how static (topographic complexity and heterogeneity) and dynamic (tempera- ture landscape) components of habitat structure influ- ence the abundance and body-size distribution of in - vertebrates on a rocky shore. Using a novel approach that included high-resolution 3D fractal surface and temperature measurements, we show that topographic complexity, temperature landscape and habitat hetero- geneity had largely independent effects on species Dynamic and static habitat traits determine associations of abundance and body size. Invertebrate abundance was invertebrates on a rocky shore: limpets Cellana tramoserica associated with temperature landscape in 7 of 11 spe- under a ledge. cies, while variation in body-size was mostly driven by Photo: J. Meager fractal topography in 7 of 10 species. Overall, the body size−abundance relationship was not influenced by habitat structure, indicating that the effects of habitat and conservation planning (e.g. Banks & Skilleter structure on body size and abundance were largely 2007, McArthur et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Rocky Intertidal Systems of Southern California Mark M
    Overview of the Rocky Intertidal Systems of Southern California Mark M. Littler Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, California 92717 INTRODUCTION The Southern California Bight (Fig. 1) has been defined (SCCWRP 1973) as the open embayment of the Pacific Ocean bounded on the east by the North American coastline extending from Point Conception, California, to Cabo Colnett, Baja California, Mexico, and on the west by the California Current. The climate of the Southern California Bight has been amply studied in quantitative terms and is relatively well known (for physical, air, and seawater data, see Kimura 1974). Wind conditions are extremely important in that major reversals occur predominantly throughout late fall and winter. This results in strong, hot, and dry "Santa Ana" winds from the inland desert regions at the time of low tides during the daylight hours, thereby causing extreme heating, desiccation, and insolation stress to intertidal organisms. Another important ecological factor is the protection of certain mainland shores and the mainland sides of islands from open ocean swell and storm waves. This leads to a higher wave-energy regime on the unprotected outer island shores with marked effects on their biological communities. Nearly all of the southern California mainland coastline is protected to some degree by the outlying islands (Ricketts, Calvin, and Hedgpeth 1968). The only mainland sites receiving direct westerly swell are near the cities of Los Angeles and San Diego. A number of substrate types were present among the 10 rocky intertidal habitats studied (Fig. 1), ranging from hard, irregular flow breccia to smooth sandstone or siltstone.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diel Dynamics of Ciliate Community in a Tide-Pool
    216 Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol. 21, Suppl., pp. 216-222 (2013) DOI: 10.6119/JMST-013-1220-11 THE DIEL DYNAMICS OF CILIATE COMMUNITY IN A TIDE-POOL Chien-Fu Chao1, Bo-Wei Wang1, Chao-Hsiung Cheng1, and Kuo-Ping Chiang1, 2, 3 Key words: ciliate, tide-pool, diel variation. rate and a short generation time, on the order of hours to days. Therefore, they are useful as models to investigate population dynamics, including the effects of disturbance or environ- ABSTRACT mental pressure, as well as cyclical behavior (Holyoak [15]). We investigated the diel cycle mechanism of a tide-pool A central in tide-pool research is whether the organisms pre- ciliate community of the northeastern coast of Taiwan. The sent there represent a resident community or are merely a investigation was conducted on 17th-18th June (typical summer reflection of the species found in adjacent coastal waters. weather), and on 23th -24th July 2013 (10 days after a typhoon). The importance of ciliates within aquatic environments re- In June, the tide-pool ecosystem was an independent and the sides in their roles as consumers of picoplankton and nano- excystment of ciliates in the tide-pool caused a dramatic in- plankton (Verity [30], Bernard and Rassoulzadegan [3], Bern- crease in population abundance, as well as composition inger et al. [4], and Calbet and Landry [6]) and as prey for change. In July, there was no significant difference between mesozooplankton (Broglio et al. [5], and Calbet and Saiz [7]). the species composition in the tide-pool and that in the sur- For these reasons, ciliates may constitute an important link rounding coastal water.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbial Communities Network Structure Across Strong Environmental Gradients: How Do
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.08.445284; this version posted June 9, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Microbial communities network structure across strong environmental gradients: How do 2 they compare to macroorganisms? 3 Arboleda-Baenaa,b, C.M; Freilichc,d, M. A; Pareja, C.Bb; Logares, Re; De la Iglesia, Rb,f; 4 Navarrete, S.A a,f 5 a Estación Costera de Investigaciones Marinas, Center for Applied Ecology and Sustainability 6 (CAPES), Millenium Nucleus NUTME, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile 7 b Laboratorio de Microbiología Marina, Departamento de Genética Molecular y Microbiología, 8 Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile 9 c Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Science, Massachusetts Institute of 10 Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 USA 11 d Department of Physical Oceanography, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution,Woods Hole, 12 Massachusetts 02543 USA 13 e Instituto de Ciencias del Mar – CSIC, Paseo Marítimo de la Barceloneta, 37 – 49, 080003 14 Barcelona, Spain 15 f Marine Energy Research & Innovation Center (MERIC), Avda. Apoquindo 2827, Santiago, 16 Chile. 17 Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] 18 1. Some data are already published, with those publications properly cited in this submission: 19 Broitman et al. 2001 and Freilich et al. 2018. 20 2. Sequence data will be deposited at the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) public database 21 under accession number PRJEB45042 and released after the journal acceptance.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of the New Zealand Rocky Shore Community
    Ecology of the New Zealand Rocky Shore Community A Resource for NCEA Level 2 Biology Darren Smith Ecology of the New Zealand Rocky Shore Community: A Resource for NCEA Level 2 Biology Author: Darren Smith Publisher: New Zealand Marine Studies Centre Address: 185 Hatchery Road, Portobello, Dunedin 9014 ISBN: 978-0-473-23177-4 (PDF) ISBN: 978-0-473-23176-7 (Softcover) January 2013 FOREWORD The New Zealand Marine Studies Centre launched a nationwide citizen science project in Seaweek 2013. Anyone can take part in this project which aims to monitor biodiversity and changes in the New Zealand seashore over time. There are two ways of taking part in the project 1. Marine Metre Squared is a simple way for individuals, families, schools and community groups to monitor the shore. 2. Seashore Survey is aimed at secondary school students to tie in with NCEA standards. This resource book is intended to assist teachers of NCEA Level 2 biology to carry out studies of the New Zealand rocky shore. Darren Smith developed this resource when he was on the Endeavour Teacher Fellowship, New Zealand Science, Mathematics and Technology Teacher Fellowship Scheme 2012. This scheme was funded by the Ministry of Science and Innovation and administered by the Royal Society of New Zealand. Darren Smith was hosted by the New Zealand Marine Studies Centre, Department of Marine Science, University of Otago. For further resources and information about the Marine Metre Squared project go to mm2.net.nz We welcome your comments and suggestions. Please email [email protected] or phone 03 479 5826.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of Community Ecology on Wave-Exposed
    ASPECTS OF COMMUNITY ECOLOGY ON WAVE-EXPOSED ROCKY HAWAI‘IAN COASTS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN BOTANY (ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY) DECEMBER 2006 By Christopher Everett Bird Dissertation Committee: Celia M. Smith, Chairperson Kent W. Bridges David C. Duffy Leonard A. Freed E. Alison Kay Halina M. Zaleski We certify that we have read this dissertation and that, in our opinion, it is satisfactory in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Botany (Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology). DISSERTATION COMMITTEE ________________________________ Chairperson ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ii Copyright 2006 Christopher Everett Bird All Rights Reserved iii DEDICATION This one goes out to my mom Betsy Bird; my dad George Bird; my grandmother Ethel Bird; my sisters and their families Gwendolyn, Scott, Alex, Mitchell, and Nicholas Bottomley, Evelyn, Mike, Andrew, and Ian Kirner; my best friend John Swistak; my boyz in NL1; my girlz in tha 808; and all the rest of my friends. You are the people who stood by my side, no matter what. Thank you for the good times, the support, and the love. I owe it all to you. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the University of Hawaii Sea Grant College (this is publication XD- 02-02), University of Hawaii Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology Program, National Parks Service, and Northwestern Hawaiian Islands National Monument for funding the research presented in this dissertation. This dissertation would not have happened without the inspiration of a few special people.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Rocky Shores and Community Ecology: an Experimentalist's Perspective
    OTTO KINNE Editor Robert T. Paine MARINE ROCKY SHORES AND COMMUNITY ECOLOGY: AN EXPERIMENTALIST’S PERSPECTIVE Introduction (Otto Kinne) Robert T. Paine: A Laudatio (Tom Fenchel) O L O G C Y Publisher: Ecology Institute E Nordbünte 23, D-21385 Oldendorf/Luhe I N E Germany S T T I T U Robert T. Paine Department of Zoology NJ-15 University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195, USA ISSN 0932-2205 Copyright © 1994, by Ecology Institute, D-21385 Oldendorf/Luhe, Germany All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced by any means, or transmitted, or translated without written permission of the publisher Printed in Germany Typesetting by Ecology Institute, Oldendorf Printing and bookbinding by Konrad Triltsch, Graphischer Betrieb, Würzburg Printed on acid-free paper Contents Introduction (Otto Kinne) .......................................... VII Robert T. Paine: Recipient of the Ecology Institute Prize 1989 in Marine Ecology. A Laudatio (Tom Fenchel) .......................... XIX Preface (Robert T. Paine)........................................... XXI I GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS ................................. 1 II HISTORICAL ORIGINS OF COMMUNITY ECOLOGY.............. 11 (1) Natural History/Observational Ecology ........................ 12 (2) Quantitative Methodologies ................................. 16 (3) Experimental Manipulation ................................. 19 (4) Mathematical Ecology ..................................... 28 (5) A Marine, Benthic Perspective on “Roots” ..................... 30 III COMPETITIVE INTERACTIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Intertidal Ecology
    Rocky Intertidal Ecology The Rocky Intertidal program at the Hatfield Marine Science Center is designed to be a 50-minute inquiry-based program that examines the dynamic environment of rocky shores and the interactions of the organisms found there. Students will learn about the complex communities in rocky intertidal areas and the ever-changing physical stresses these organisms are subjected to. During this program students will: 1. Identify rocky intertidal habitat and examine its typical inhabitants 2. Learn about environmental pressures and adaptations 3. Examine population interactions in the community Background Information The Oregon Coast is often identified by its rugged rocky shores, with crashing waves and hardy creatures clinging to rocks. These areas are intertidal and are alternately inundated by seawater and exposed to air, wind, and dramatic changes in temperature. High tide floods these areas with cold, nutrient laden seawater, bringing food to organisms that live there in the form of plankton and detritus. Low tides often expose these organisms to the dangers of predation and desiccation. Because of these harsh conditions, organisms have developed special adaptations that not only help them to survive but thrive in these environments. An adaptation is a physical or behavioral trait that helps a plant or animal survive in a specific environment or habitat. Ecology is the study of the distribution and abundance of organisms and their interactions with their environment. The rocky shore habitats are very diverse and can range from sheer vertical rock walls to sheltered tidepools. Rocky shores experience vertical zonation, which is the arrangement of plants and animals in distinct horizontal layers caused by limiting factors or a combination of what each organism can tolerate physically as well as interactions between organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Wave Exposure on Seasonal Morphological
    Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2012, 92(7), 1595–1601. # Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2012 doi:10.1017/S0025315412000173 Impact of wave exposure on seasonal morphological and reproductive responses of the intertidal limpet Fissurella crassa (Mollusca: Archaegastropoda) jose’ pulgar1, marcos alvarez5, alejandro delgadillo1,4, ines herrera1, samanta benitez1,2, juan pablo morales5, pilar molina3, marcela aldana1,3,6 and victor manuel pulgar7 1Universidad Andres Bello, Departamento de Ecologı´a & Biodiversidad, Repu´blica 470, Santiago Chile, 2Universidad Andres Bello Escuela de Biologı´a Marina, Repu´blica 440, Santiago, Chile, 3Pontificia Universidad Cato´lica de Chile, Alameda 370, Santiago, Chile, 4Escuela de Ingenierı´a en Acuicultura, Universidad Andres Bello, Repu´blica 440, Santiago, Chile, 5Universidad Andres Bello, Facultad de Ciencias Biolo´gicas, Repu´blica 217, Santiago, Chile, 6Escuela de Pedagogı´a en Biologı´a y Ciencias, Facultad de Ciencias de la Educacio´n, Universidad Central de Chile, Santa Isabel 1278, Santiago, 7Center for Research in Obstetrics & Gynecology, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Infrastructure Center, Winston-Salem State University, Winston-Salem NC, USA Intertidal organisms have long been considered an ideal system to quantify how physical variations determine differential energy allocations in specimens inhabiting environmental gradients such as exposure to wave action. In habitats with differ- ential intertidal wave exposure (sheltered, Sh; and exposed, E) seasonal gonadal and foot weight variations and their associ- ations with exposure and food availability (algae abundance) were determined in the keyhole limpet Fissurella crassa. Gonadal weight is used as a measure of reproduction allocation whereas foot weight is an indirect indicator of energy allo- cation to survival.
    [Show full text]