Learning Unit
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Origin and Evolvement of Chinese Characters
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Portal Czasopism Naukowych (E-Journals) BI WEI THE ORIGIN AND EVOLVEMENT OF CHINESE CHARACTERS Writing, the carrier of culture and the symbol of human civilization, fi rst appeared in Sumer1. Like other ancient languages of Egypt and India, ancient Sumerian symbols have been lost in the process of history, but only Chinese characters still remain in use today. They have played a signifi cant role in the development of Chinese lan- guage and culture. This article intends to display how Chinese characters were creat- ed and how they were simplifi ed from the ancient form of writing to more abstract. Origin of Chinese characters Chinese characters, in their initial forms, were beautiful and appropriately refl ected images in the minds of ancient Chinese that complied with their understanding of reality. Chinese people selected the way of expressing meaning by fi gures and pic- tures, and Chinese characters begun with drawings. Three Myths in Ancient Times It is diffi cult to determine the specifi c time when the Chinese characters emerged. There are three old myths about the origin of Chinese characters. The fi rst refers to the belief that Chinese characters were created by Fu Xi – the fi rst of Three Sovereigns2 in ancient China, who has drew the Eight Trigrams which have evolved into Chinese characters. The mysterious Eight Trigrams3 used for divination are composed of the symbols “–” and “– –”, representing Yang and Yin respectively. 1 I.J. Gelb, Sumerian language, [in:] Encyclopedia Britannica Online, Encyclopedia Britannica, re- trieved 30.07.2011, www.britannica.com. -
Wang Guowei, Gu Hongming and Chinese Philosophical Modernity
WANG GUOWEI, GU HONGMING AND CHINESE PHILOSOPHICAL MODERNITY Jinli He Abstract: This paper aims to explore the issue of modernity in Chinese philosophy in the early 20th century. The case study focuses on modern scholar Wang Guowei 王國維 (1877-1927)’s criticism of his contemporary Gu Hongming 辜鴻銘 (1857-1928)’s English translation of the classical Confucian text Zhongyong. I argue that Wang Guowei and Gu Hongming’s case in fact demonstrates two alternative approaches towards philosophical dialogue and cultural exchange. Wang’s approach is a very cultural context-sensitive one: understanding the differences and selecting what is needed for cultural inspiration and reformation—we could call this approach nalaizhuyi 拿來主義 (taking-inism)—borrowing without touching the cultural essence. Gu’s approach is more a songchuzhuyi 送出主義 (sending-outism). It is a global-local context sensitive one: searching for the local’s path towards the global. Reevaluating Gu’s not very exact cultural translation can provide an opportunity to look beyond the “modernization complex,” deconstruct westernization “spell,” and build a new internationalism. I further argue that Gu’s case represents a kind of risky songchuzhuyi and a false internationalism which makes the native culture speak in the other’s terms while Wang’s cultural stand and his “journey” back to his own cultural sensibility sticks to its own terms and discovers the value of the culture. I then further look at Wang Guowei’s ideal of shenshengzhuyi 生生主 義 (live-life-ism) which was originally expressed in his Hongloumeng Pinglun 《红楼梦 评论》(Critique of A Dream of Red Mansions, 1904) and claim that not only can the ideal of shengshengzhuyi explain the underlying reason for an essential turn in Wang’s academic interests from Western philosophy to Chinese history and archaeology, but it can also be applied positively to the contemporary world. -
Power, Identity and Antiquarian Approaches in Modern Chinese Art
Power, identity and antiquarian approaches in modern Chinese art Chia-Ling Yang Within China, nationalistic sentiments notably inhibit objective analysis of Sino- Japanese and Sino-Western cultural exchanges during the end of the Qing dynasty and throughout the Republican period: the fact that China was occupied by external and internal powers, including foreign countries and Chinese warlords, ensured that China at this time was not governed or united by one political body. The contemporary concept of ‘China’ as ‘one nation’ has been subject to debate, and as such, it is also difficult to define what the term ‘Chinese painting’ means.1 The term, guohua 國畫 or maobihua 毛筆畫 (brush painting) has traditionally been translated as ‘Chinese national painting’. 2 While investigating the formation of the concept of guohua, one might question what guo 國 actually means in the context of guohua. It could refer to ‘Nationalist painting’ as in the Nationalist Party, Guomindang 國民黨, which was in power in early 20th century China. It could also be translated as ‘Republican painting’, named after minguo 民國 (Republic of China). These political sentiments had a direct impact on guoxue 國學 (National Learning) and guocui 國粹 (National Essence), textual evidence and antiquarian studies on the development of Chinese history and art history. With great concern over the direction that modern Chinese painting should take, many prolific artists and intellectuals sought inspiration from jinshixue 金石學 (metal and stone studies/epigraphy) as a way to revitalise the Chinese -
History of the Chinese Collection at the American Numismatic Society Lyce Jankowski
History of the Chinese Collection at the American Numismatic Society Lyce Jankowski To cite this version: Lyce Jankowski. History of the Chinese Collection at the American Numismatic Society. American Journal of Numismatics, The American Numismatic Society, 2018. hal-02302381 HAL Id: hal-02302381 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02302381 Submitted on 18 Oct 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NUMISMATICS 30 Second Series, continuing The American Numismatic Society Museum Notes THE AMERICAN NUMISMATIC SOCIETY NEW YORK 2018 © 2018 The American Numismatic Society ISSN: 1053-8356 ISBN 978-0-89722-354-6 Printed in China Contents Editorial Committee v Editors’ Note vii Lloyd W. H. Taylor. The Earliest Alexander III Tetradrachm Coinage of Babylon: Iconographic Development and Chronology 1 Paul Vădan. The Posthumous Alexander Tetradrachms of Magnesia on the Maeander 45 Oliver D. Hoover. The Personification of Apameia 107 Clive Stannard, Jean-Albert Chevillon, and Alejandro G. Sinner. More Coins of the Pompeian Pseudomint from France 117 Lucia Carbone. The Unpublished Iberian Lead Tokens in the Richard B. Witschonke Collection at the American Numismatic Society 131 Liv Mariah Yarrow. -
4 CONFRONTING INDIANA JONES Chinese Nationalism, Historical Imperialism, and the Criminalization of Aurel Stein and the Raiders of Dunhuang, 1899–1944 Justin Jacobs
4 CONFRONTING INDIANA JONES Chinese Nationalism, Historical Imperialism, and the Criminalization of Aurel Stein and the Raiders of Dunhuang, 1899–1944 Justin Jacobs On December 27, 1930, the Tianjin press boldly branded one of the world’s foremost archaeologists an insatiable “thief” for the !rst time and demanded his immediate expulsion from the country. Unaware of the public besmirching of his name and newly arrived in the oasis outpost of Keriya nearly half a continent away, Marc Aurel Stein was far more concerned with an alarmingly persistent spew of bloody phlegm than with the vagaries of the Chinese press. "e headline in the L’ Im p a r t i a l (Dagongbao), however, was adamant: “Under Pretense of ‘Travel,’ Stein Plunders Xinjiang Antiquities; Outrageous Speeches in America Insult Chinese Nation; Immediate Expulsion Requested.” According to the report, among Stein’s many o#enses were his “absurd claims” that the far northwestern province of Xinjiang “does not even count as part of Chinese territory” and that “the Chinese race is on the verge of extinction.” By far his most unforgivable crime, however, was the “pilfering and permanent removal of Dunhuang’s storehouse of treasures to a foreign land.” "is act alone constituted an “enormous loss to our country.”1 "ough several more months would pass before local obstruction e#orts !nally succeeded in driving Stein out of Xinjiang for good, the massive smear campaign directed against the diminutive Hungarian-born British citizen had now !nally gone public, and the days of unchecked foreign archaeological expeditions in China were just about over. -
The Origin and Evolvement of Chinese Characters
BI WEI THE ORIGIN AND EVOLVEMENT OF CHINESE CHARACTERS Writing, the carrier of culture and the symbol of human civilization, fi rst appeared in Sumer1. Like other ancient languages of Egypt and India, ancient Sumerian symbols have been lost in the process of history, but only Chinese characters still remain in use today. They have played a signifi cant role in the development of Chinese lan- guage and culture. This article intends to display how Chinese characters were creat- ed and how they were simplifi ed from the ancient form of writing to more abstract. Origin of Chinese characters Chinese characters, in their initial forms, were beautiful and appropriately refl ected images in the minds of ancient Chinese that complied with their understanding of reality. Chinese people selected the way of expressing meaning by fi gures and pic- tures, and Chinese characters begun with drawings. Three Myths in Ancient Times It is diffi cult to determine the specifi c time when the Chinese characters emerged. There are three old myths about the origin of Chinese characters. The fi rst refers to the belief that Chinese characters were created by Fu Xi – the fi rst of Three Sovereigns2 in ancient China, who has drew the Eight Trigrams which have evolved into Chinese characters. The mysterious Eight Trigrams3 used for divination are composed of the symbols “–” and “– –”, representing Yang and Yin respectively. 1 I.J. Gelb, Sumerian language, [in:] Encyclopedia Britannica Online, Encyclopedia Britannica, re- trieved 30.07.2011, www.britannica.com. 2 Worshiping the Three Sage Kings and Five Virtuous Emperors – The Imperial Temple of Emperors of Successive Dynasties in Beijing, Beijing 2007. -
CHEN-DISSERTATION-2017.Pdf (1.546Mb)
Collecting as Cultural Technique: Materialistic Interventions Into History in 20th Century China The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Chen, Guangchen. 2017. Collecting as Cultural Technique: Materialistic Interventions Into History in 20th Century China. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41141785 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Collecting as Cultural Technique: Materialistic Interventions into History in 20th Century China A dissertation presented by Guangchen Chen to The Department of Comparative Literature in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Comparative Literature Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2017 © 2017 Guangchen Chen All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Professors David Damrosch and David Wang Guangchen Chen Collecting as Cultural Technique: Materialistic Interventions into History in 20th Century China Abstract This dissertation explores the interplay between the collecting of ancient artifacts and intellectual innovations in twentieth century China. It argues that the practice of collecting is an epistemological attempt or a “cultural technique,” as formulated by the German media theorist Bernhard Siegert, to grasp the world in its myriad materiality and historicity. Through experiments on novel ways to reconfigure objects and study them as media on which intangible experiences are recorded, collectors cling to the authenticity of past events, preserve memory through ownership, and forge an intimate relationship with these objects. -
CURRICULUM VITAE Qianshen Bai [email protected]
CURRICULUM VITAE Qianshen Bai [email protected] EDUCATION 1996 Ph.D. in History of Art, Yale University 1993 M.Phil. in History of Art, Yale University 1992 M.A. in History of Art, Yale University 1990 M.A. in Political Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 1985-86 Graduate Program in Political Science, Peking University, Beijing, China 1982 Bachelor of Law, Peking University TEACHING AND WORKING EXPERIENCES 2019- Director of Zhejiang University Museum of Art and Archaeology 2019- Dean of School of Art and Archaeology, Zhejiang University 2019- Professor of art history at School of Art and Archaeology, Zhejiang University 2015- Professor of art history at The Art and Archaeology Research Center, Research Institute of Cultural Heritage, Zhejiang University 2004-15 Associate professor of Asian art history, Department of Art History, Boston University 2002 Visiting assistant professor, Department of History of Art and Architecture, Harvard University (Spring semester) 1997-04 Assistant professor of Asian art history, Department of Art History, Boston University 1996-97 Assistant professor of Asian art history, Department of Art, Western Michigan University 1995 Instructor of Asian art history, Department of Art, Western Michigan University 1994 Co-instructor for the graduate seminar “Methods and Resources for the Study of Premodern China,” Yale University 1994 Instructor for the Yale College Seminar “The History and Techniques of Chinese and Japanese Calligraphy,” Yale University 1992 Teaching assistant for “Introduction to the History of Art,” Yale University 1987-90 Visiting instructor of calligraphy, Department of East Asian Language and Literature, Rutgers University 1982-85 Instructor of the history of Chinese political institutions, Peking University AWARDS AND HONORS 2011-12 Fellowship offered by the National Endowment for the Humanities. -
The Emergence of 'Cultural Heritage' in Modern China: a Historical And
The emergence of ‘cultural heritage’ in modern China: a historical and legal perspective Guolong Lai University of Florida Introduction In the fall of 1924, the pre-eminent modern Chinese scholar Wang Guowei 王國維 (1877−1927) wrote a long acrimoni- ous letter to Shen Jianshi 沈兼士 (1885–1947) and Ma Heng 馬 衡 (1880–1955), directors of the National Beijing University’s Department of Chinese Classics (guoxuemen 國學門) and its archaeology program. The letter came in response to a ‘Manifesto How to cite this book chapter: Lai, G 2016 The emergence of ‘cultural heritage’ in modern China: a his- torical and legal perspective. In: Matsuda, A and Mengoni, L E (eds.) Reconsidering Cultural Heritage in East Asia, Pp. 47–85. London: Ubiquity Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/baz.d. License: CC-BY 4.0 48 Reconsidering Cultural Heritage in East Asia for the Preservation of the Ancient Site at Dagongshan’ (Baocun Dagongshan guji xuanyan 保存大宮山古蹟宣言) by the University’s Archaeological Society, which Wang Guowei had just seen printed in a newspaper (Lui, & Yuan 1984: 405−407; Yuan & Lui 1996: 431−433; see also Bonner 1986: 202−204). The mani- festo deplored a Manchu prince’s destruction of the ‘state property’ (guanchan 官產) at Dagongshan in the Dajue 大覺 temple, in the western suburbs of Beijing. It went on to accuse the abdicated Last Emperor Puyi 溥儀 (1906−1967), who was still living in the back quarter of the Forbidden City, of having ‘taken ancient artefacts (guqiwu 古器物) handed down through the ages as his personal property’, and called on the Chinese people and the Nationalist government to stop the destruction of national heritage. -
Annual Report 2020 Annual Report Contents 2 Corporate Information 4 CEO’S Statement
(Incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited liability) Stock Code : 1896 2020 Annual Report 2020 Annual ANNUAL REPORT Contents 2 Corporate Information 4 CEO’s Statement 9 Management Discussion and Analysis 18 Profiles of Directors and Senior Management 23 Directors’ Report 62 Corporate Governance Report 82 Independent Auditor’s Report 89 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 91 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 93 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 95 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 97 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 210 Financial Summary 211 Environmental, Social and Governance Report 225 Definitions and Glossary 2 MAOYAN ENTERTAINMENT / Annual Report 2020 Corporate Information BOARD OF DIRECTORS REMUNERATION COMMITTEE Executive Director Mr. Wang Hua (Chairman) Mr. Ma Dong (resigned on August 18, 2020) Mr. Zheng Zhihao (Chief Executive Officer) Ms. Liu Lin (appointed on August 18, 2020) Non-executive Directors Mr. Zheng Zhihao Mr. Wang Changtian (Chairman) JOINT COMPANY SECRETARIES Ms. Li Xiaoping Ms. Zheng Xia Ms. Wang Jian Mr. Cheng Ching Kit Mr. Zhan Weibiao (resigned on June 9, 2020) Mr. Cheng Wu (appointed on June 9, 2020) AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES Mr. Chen Shaohui Mr. Lin Ning Mr. Zheng Zhihao Mr. Tang Lichun, Troy (appointed on January 15, 2020) Mr. Cheng Ching Kit Independent Non-executive Directors AUDITOR Mr. Wang Hua PricewaterhouseCoopers Mr. Chan Charles Sheung Wai Certified Public Accountants Mr. Ma Dong (resigned on October 28, 2020) Registered Public Interest Entity Auditor Mr. Yin Hong (appointed on October 28, 2020) Mr. Luo Zhenyu (resigned on June 9, 2020) REGISTERED OFFICE Ms. Liu Lin (appointed on June 9, 2020) Walkers Corporate Limited 190 Elgin Avenue, AUDIT COMMITTEE George Town, Mr. -
Globalization and Chinese Education in the Early 20Th Century
Front. Educ. China 2013, 8(3): 398–419 DOI 10.3868/s110-002-013-0026-4 RESEARCH ARTICLE Paul J. BAILEY Globalization and Chinese Education in the Early 20th Century Abstract With China’s growing significance in the global economy ever more evident, studies in recent years have highlighted multiple aspects of China’s “Globalization” (or global connections) that predate the contemporary period. This article focuses on educational reform in the late Qing and early Republic as a way of illuminating a significant aspect of China’s Globalization during this period. In particular, the article highlights the role of an emerging Chinese educational “lobby” that was involved in administration, teaching, and textbook compilation; furthermore, this lobby pioneered the introduction of new ideas, concepts, and innovative practice from abroad in the specialized journals on education—the first of their kind in China—which they edited and contributed to. More significantly, contributors to these journals engaged with and discussed educational issues and problems that were simultaneously being debated in the West. In the process Chinese educators and officials were able to draw upon, either to valorize or critique, a wide spectrum of contemporary foreign educational debate and practice in their prognosis of domestic education and its future. The picture that emerges of Chinese education during this period is one in which Chinese educators perceived themselves very much as active participants in a global educational community. Keywords Globalization, nation-building, educational reform, Chinese educational lobby, educational press Introduction As China’s growing significance in the global economy becomes ever more evident, historians have begun to highlight multiple aspects of China’s “Globalization” (or global connections) that “predate” the contemporary period (especially during the 19th and early 20th centuries). -
The Role of Japan in Modern Chinese Art Edited by Joshua A
The Role of Japan in Modern Chinese Art Edited by Joshua A. Fogel Published in association with the University of California Press “This ambitious, very important project defines no less than a new field of inquiry, one that scarcely could have been attempted in the past. The essays in this volume add enor- mously to the documentation of what late-period Chinese art learned from Japan, and begin to formulate conclu- sions that will enrich future accounts of both Japanese and Chinese art.” JAMES CAHILL, University of California, Berkeley The modern histories of China and Japan are inexorably intertwined. Their relationship is perhaps most obvious in the fields of political, economic, and military history, but it is no less true in cultural and art history. Yet the traffic in artistic practices and practitioners between China and Japan remains an understudied field. In this volume, an international group of scholars investigates Japan’s impact on Chinese art from the mid-nineteenth cen- tury through the 1930s. Individual essays address a range of perspectives, including the work of individual Chinese and Japanese painters, calligraphers, and sculptors, as well as artistic associations, international exhibitions, the collotype production or artwork, and the emergence of a modern canon. JOSHUA A. FOGEL is Canada Research Chair and a professor of history at York University, Toron - to, and a specialist in the history of cultural and political ties between China and Japan in the mod - ern era. CONTRIBUTORS: Julia F. Andrews | Shana J. Brown | Chen Jie | Lisa Claypool | Walter B. Davis | Zaixin Hong | Yu-chih Lai | Tamaki Maeda | Kuiyi Shen | Richard Vinograd | Cheng-hua Wang | Aida Yuen Wong New Perspectives on Chinese Culture and Society, 3 The Role of Japan in Modern Chinese Art New PersPectives oN chiNese culture aNd society A series sponsored by the American Council of Learned Societies and made possible through a grant from the Chiang Ching-kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange 1.