No. 19, November-December, 1970

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

No. 19, November-December, 1970 Syndicalism and Leninism ... Page~ 6 NUMBER 19 NOVEMBER·DECEMBER 1970 15 CENTS Conflicts Sharpen • Labor The· deepening political polarization of American their real wages in 1973 are no lower than in 1967! It society, triggered chiefly by the Viet Nam war and its was this sellout contract that 20 thousand workers (or economic effects, has begun to make itself felt within the 11 quarter of the strikers), including the major Schen­ labor movement. After a prolonged period of relative ectady local, voted to reject. The settlement was so bad quiescence in the v,rake of the McCarthy witchhunt, that even as conservative a business union as the which beheaded the labor movement by purging from its Machinists felt compelled to keep their GE plants out ranks the most active militants as well as all known despite scant hope of victory. radicals, a period of heightened struggle has begun. As After defending the GE settlement, Parry went 011 is often the case, the most evident signs of this renewed to defend union leaderships against charges of antag­ upsurge are manifestations of fi'iction and fragmenta­ onism to the rank and file. What was involved was not a tion at the top. The split within the union bureaucracy, defense of the principle of leadership against anarcho­ reflecting the deep split in the ruling class itself over the libertarian gripes, but a positive and specific endorse­ Viet Nam war, is entirely limited to bureancratic jockey­ ment of a substantial section of the existing trade union ing for position, but such a schism provides opportuni­ bureancl'Clcies. Singled out for praise were Jerry Wurf ties for radicals within the labor movement. (AFSCME). Leonard Woodcock (UAW) and Harry Inevitably, those within the union movement who fear Bridges (lLWU). Parry's only attempt to provide po­ the burgeoning mood of dissent among the ranks will litical justification for this disgusting display was the get "out of hand" are moving quickly to keep it within inane argument that union leaders organize c1ass­ "respectable" bounds. The Communist Party, despite its struggle actions such as strikes. Any moderately militant exposure as arch-betrayer of militant struggles during rank and file worker knows that these bureaucrats dis­ World War II and the organizational beating it took turb their comfortable coexistence with anti-strike poli­ during the witchhunt, still has a trade union residue and ticians only when fot'ced to do so by their memberships. is in the best position to take immediate advantage of Moreover, the "liberal" union machines are by no means any increased room to maneuver within the labor move­ necessarily the most aggressive even in purely "business ment. The CP now prepares itself to play the same role ullion" terms. By his own logic, Parry should prefer the it has played in the anti-war movement: to tie the mili­ reactionary head of New York's Central Labor Council, tant upsurge to liberalism. Harry Van Arsdale, who called a number of strikes when organizing New York's taxi drivers, to the CP's . CP "Rank and File" Conference darling Bridges, who hasn't called a strike in 35 years! In June 1970 the CP organized a trade union con­ The conference reaffirmed the policy which the CP ference of some 800 delegates. The conference had a pursued throughout the history of the CIO: to act as thoroughly respectable air, featuring many union offi­ the loyal "left" supporters for "progressive" union bu­ cials and mayor-elect Gibson of Newark. It was remark­ reaucrats and liberal bourgeois politicians. It ii'l pre­ ably low-key, little more than a passive adaptation to the cisely this policy of seeking to build workers' confIdence widely felt need for a left labor grouping to counter the in their "progressive" enemies that facilitated the developing Meany-Nixon combine. A major aspect was purges of the labor movement when the political climate defense of "progressive" union bureaucrats against at­ turned reactionary. The CP tried to protect itself by tacks by both radical groups and rank and file militants. adopting a fawning attitude to the CIO leadership, In particular need of such defense were the "liberal" first Lewis and then Murray. To this end, they carefully Jennings leadership of the IUE and the old-time Stalin­ avoided supporting any internal opposition in the coal ist Matles-Fitzgerald leadership of the UE. Thus Will miners' or steelworkers' unions, just as today the CP Parry, Secretary-Treasurer of the Association of West­ defends the sellout GE settlement and refuses to con­ 'ern Pulp and Paper Workers, devoted much of his demn the repression of Black caucuses in the UA W so keynote speech to an empassioned defense of the GE as not to antagonize the Jennings and Woodcock leader­ strike settlement. ships. Let's look at the settlement. UE President Fitzgerald Such opportunist tactics simply do not work. When stated that the GE workers had lost 30c an hour during the Cold War pressure got to Murray he announced, the previous contract due to inflation. The strike settle­ "there is no room for Communism in the CIO," to which ment called for a 53c an hour increase over 40 months the CP could only piteously reply, "Where is the Philip (longer than the standard 3 years). To top this off, the Murray Ice knew?" The CP's disastrous policy of ca­ cost-of-living escalator had a 21c an hour cap. Even pitulation thus prepared the way not ouly for its own with moderate inflation, the GE workers will be lucky if (Continued Next Page) 2- SPARTACIST .. LABOR' leading advocates of anti-working-class wag'e-price controls. Some, such as destruction but for the purge of all mil­ Victor Gotbaum, head of New York's itants and radicals from the labor State, County and Municipal Employ­ SPARTACJST movement. ees' union, are seeking to strengthen An Organ of The CP trade union conference clear­ their image as "progressive," "demo­ Revolutionary Marxism ly indicated the CP's continued refusal cratic" union leaders and garner mid­ EDITORS: David Cunningham; to break with the two capitalist parties. dle-class liberal support to fortify their Managing, Elizabeth Gordon; Against the demand for a political position within the labor movement. West Coast, Mark King; party of labor, the conference repeated Throughout the history of American Southern, Leon Day; the ancient Gompers axiom of reward­ labor, bureaucrats such as Hillman and New England, George Foster. ing one's friends and punishing one's Reuther have sought to draw attention BUSINESS MANAGER: Elaine West. enemies. The Democratic Party "friend away from their rotten record in fight­ of labor" myth, eagerly perpetuated by ing for their own members by project­ Subscription: $1 for ten issues. Bundle rates for 10 or more copies. Main address: the CP, is a fraud. All bourgeois poli­ ing a liberal humanitarian posture. Box 1377, G.P.O., New York, N.Y. 10001. ticians, whatever verbal concessions Thus David Livingston's Distributive Telephone: WA ~·2426. Western address: they make to secure union endorse­ Workers' union has recently shifted its Box 852, B!!rkeley, Calif. 94701. Tele· ments and union members' votes, op­ attention away from the difficult job of phone: 626·{j505. Southern address: Box pose the expansion of labor's power. organizing the mass of poorly-paid 8165, U.T. Sta., Austin, Texas 78712. Tele· The true sentiments of that classic workers in light manufacturing, retail phone: 478·3565. New England address: "friends of labor," F-ranklin Roosevelt, and wholesale in favor of organizing Box 188, M.I.T. Sta., Cambridge, Mass. were revealed during the decisive Little campus employees on the basis of a 02139. Telephone: 891·6678. Steel strikes in 1937, when he said "a liberal anti-war, social do-goodism Published by the Central Committee of curse on both your houses"-this after stance. the Spartaeist League. Opinions ex· Republic Steel had murdered 13 picket­ pressed in signed articles 'do not neces· In good part, the development of sarily represent an editorial viewpoint. ing workers! Similarly, for all their anti-war activism among sections of the .... 98 talk, not a single major liberal poli­ union bureaucracy is an attempt to tician-not one-condemned Nixon's use undercut opposition within their own Number 19 Nov.-Dec. 1970 of troops to break last year's postal unions, especially unions like Living­ wildcat. ston's Distributive Workers' union and Representatives of the Spartacist Leon Davis' Hospital Workers' union more obvious. Anti-war union activists League at the conference opposed the which contain many Black and Spanish­ should launch agitational campaigns to disastrous policy of allying with the speaking workers, many of whom are have their union call a one-day strike liberal wing of the bourgeoisie and sharply critical of the Viet Nam war. in conjunction with the next national their "labor lieutenants." Along with One of the most important aims of protest. The inevitable opposition from other militants, they put forward an the anti-war bureaucrats, welcomed by even the most "progressive" bureau­ oppositional proposal (see SPART ACIST the anti-war movement's established crats to mobilizing the real power of #17-18). Appropriately, the left oppo­ leadership, is to bring anti-war radicals the working class against the war will sition at the conference was handled in back to the liberal wing' of the Demo­ expose them and convince many work­ much the same manner that the CP's cratic Party by implying that liberal ers that all sections of the existing friends in labor officialdom handle their politicians represent the oppressed labor bureaucracy must be thrown out.
Recommended publications
  • ARTICLES Rebel Or Revolutionary? Jack Kavanagh and the Early Years of the Communist Movement in Vancouver, 1920-1925
    ARTICLES Rebel or Revolutionary? Jack Kavanagh and the Early Years of the Communist Movement in Vancouver, 1920-1925 David Akers DURINGTHE1919VANCOUVERGENERALSTRIKE, the guardians of conventional 'law and order' in the city, the middle-class Citizens League, bemoaned the evils of "Kavanagh Bolshevism" and its "red-eyed vision of Soviet control."1 Jack Kavanagh — a member of the general strike committee, prominent "platform speaker" for the Socialist Party of Canada (SPC), and the provincial chairman of the One Big Union (OBU) in British Columbia — was a prime target for the establishment backlash against labour militancy in Vancouver.2 Red Scare hysterics aside, Kavanagh did, from October 1917, openly embrace the Russian Revolution and its "proletarian dictatorship," as he labelled the Soviet 'Vancouver Citizen, 25 June 1919. "On Kavanagh's role in the 1919 Canadian labour revolt, see Paul A. Phillips, No Power Greater: A Century of Labour in British Columbia (Vancouver 1967), 66-84; Martin Robin, Radical Politics and Canadian Labour, J880-1930 (Kingston 1968), 138-98; A. Ross McCormack, Reformers, Rebels, and Revolutionaries: The Western Canadian Radical Movement, 1899-1919 (Toronto 1977), 145-54; David J. Bercuson, Fools and Wise Men: The Rise and Fall of the One Big Union (Toronto 1978), 57-170; Gerald Friesen, '"Yours in Revolt' : The Socialist Party of Canada and the Western Canadian Labour Movement," in Labour/Le Travail, 1 (1976), 139-55; Dave Adams, "The Canadian Labour Revolt of 1919: The West Coast Story," in Socialist Worker, 161 (November, 1990). David Akers, "Rebel or Revolutionary? Jack Kavanagh and the Early Years of the Com­ munist Movement in Vancouver, 1920-1925, Labour/Le Travail 30 (Fall 1992), 9-44.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle for Workers Rights in Australia by Aggie Mccallum
    Socialist Fight Issue No. 5 Winter 2010-11 Price: Concessions: 50p, Waged: £2.00 Only a United Anti-cuts Campaign based on strikes and occupations will defeat the Coalition assault Contents Page 2: Editorial: Only a United Anti-cuts Campaign based on strikes and occupations will defeat the Coalition assault. Page 5: Three days in the life of an Unemployed Workers Centre. Page 6: Ireland on the Rack: Defend the welfare state, de- fend the Republican Prisoners By AJ Byrne. Page 7: After the Irish bailout: The financial wolf pack tar- gets new victims By Nick Beams. Page 8: Ireland: The Creepy Millionaires’ Budget By Michael Taft. Page 9: Jimmy Reid: “It cannae be Lenin — he’s deid” Obitu- ary By Tony Fox. Page 12: The Jerry Hicks Campaign: Good Trot, Bad Trot and Trot in the Middle By Gerry Downing. Page 14: Obama’s America: The Furlough—Intent and Im- pact By Jake Cooper. Page 16: Mumia Abu-Jamal, on Pennsylvania's death row for 29 years By Dave Lindorfff. Page 18: Class Struggle in Zimbabwe by Ady, RIL - FI (Zimbabwe). Page 20: Trotskyist Turn in Nepal? By Rajesh Tyagi (New Wave). Page 20: Comment on the above By Ret Marut. Page 21: Women's Oppression: Two opposing views of the sex industry. Page 24: Letters pages. Page 28: Dubstep rebellion - the British banlieue comes to Millbank By Paul Mason Page 29: The Recession and Theories of Imperialism: It has to be Lenin! By Ret Marut. Page 31: Debating the Thermidor: “Me No Dirty Commie” By Gerry Downing. Page 33: Ark Tribe….Battle for Workers Rights in Australia By Aggie McCallum.
    [Show full text]
  • The Left in Europe
    ContentCornelia Hildebrandt / Birgit Daiber (ed.) The Left in Europe Political Parties and Party Alliances between Norway and Turkey Cornelia Hildebrandt / Birgit Daiber (ed.): The Left in Europe. Political Parties and Party Alliances between Norway and Turkey A free paperback copy of this publication in German or English can be ordered by email to [email protected]. © Rosa Luxemburg Foundation Brussels Office 2009 2 Content Preface 5 Western Europe Paul-Emile Dupret 8 Possibilities and Limitations of the Anti-Capitalist Left in Belgium Cornelia Hildebrandt 18 Protests on the Streets of France Sascha Wagener 30 The Left in Luxemburg Cornelia Weissbach 41 The Left in The Netherlands Northern Europe Inger V. Johansen 51 Denmark - The Social and Political Left Pertti Hynynen / Anna Striethorst 62 Left-wing Parties and Politics in Finland Dag Seierstad 70 The Left in Norway: Politics in a Centre-Left Government Henning Süßer 80 Sweden: The Long March to a coalition North Western Europe Thomas Kachel 87 The Left in Brown’s Britain – Towards a New Realignment? Ken Ahern / William Howard 98 Radical Left Politics in Ireland: Sinn Féin Central Europe Leo Furtlehner 108 The Situation of the Left in Austria 3 Stanislav Holubec 117 The Radical Left in Czechia Cornelia Hildebrandt 130 DIE LINKE in Germany Holger Politt 143 Left-wing Parties in Poland Heiko Kosel 150 The Communist Party of Slovakia (KSS) Southern Europe Mimmo Porcaro 158 The Radical Left in Italy between national Defeat and European Hope Dominic Heilig 166 The Spanish Left
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Foot and the Labour Leadership
    Michael Foot and the Labour Leadership Michael Foot and the Labour Leadership by Andrew Scott Crines Michael Foot and the Labour Leadership, by Andrew Scott Crines This book first published 2011 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2011 by Andrew Scott Crines All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-3159-X, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-3159-8 Dedicated to Patricia and Harold Crines, loving parents of the author. Michael Foot (1913-2010) TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface........................................................................................................ ix Acknowledgements .................................................................................... xi Abbreviations ........................................................................................... xiii Chapter One................................................................................................. 1 Introduction Chapter Two .............................................................................................. 15 Michael Foot’s Political Education Chapter Three ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reclaiming Radicalism: Discursive Wars and the Left
    tripleC 19 (1): 212-230, 2021 http://www.triple-c.at Reclaiming Radicalism: Discursive Wars and the Left Giorgos Charalambous University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus, [email protected], https://www.unic.ac.cy/charalambous-giorgos/ Abstract: The aim of this article is to identify and discuss a number of labels that have been increasingly used to describe, categorise and study the contemporary radical left – the movements and parties of the socialist tradition and its contemporary derivatives – pointing to the deeply political implications of these trends. More specifically, ‘extremism’, ‘populism’ and ‘nationalism’ as signifiers of what left radicalism looks like are scrutinised in terms of both the political logic and the historical background behind their use, and the challenges they raise for emancipatory, progressive politics. A plea for recasting contemporary social and political struggles for equality and rights is subsequently articulated, the central conviction advanced being terminological: the left’s struggles today must rise above the verbal smoke of the predominant discourse about this political space. It is a key task to appropriately qualify those terms that taint contemporary radicals with colours which do not represent them or fall far short from defining them. Put simply, if the radical left is to succeed electorally and channel its vision into society effectively it needs to reclaim its chief identity trait in the public sphere: left radicalism itself. Reclaiming radicalism entails a number of strategic tasks. These are laid out in terms of imperative discursive articulations, which are, however, paralleled by particular political actions on the ground that can either confirm or undermine any terminological claims.
    [Show full text]
  • A Very Political Project: Charles Haughey, Social Partnership and the Pursuit of an “Irish Economic Miracle”, 1969-92
    Dublin City University School of Law and Government A Very Political Project: Charles Haughey, Social Partnership and the pursuit of an “Irish economic miracle”, 1969-92 By Philip O’Connor Thesis completed under the supervision of Prof. Gary Murphy in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dublin City University, School of Law and Government January 2020 Declaration I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of Doctor of Philosophy is entirely my own work, and that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, does not to the best of my knowledge breach any law of copyright, and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. Signed: ________________ (Candidate) DCU ID: 54160707 Date: 6th Jan. 2020 Table of Contents Table of Contents 3 Acknowledgements 6 Abstract 7 Introduction 8 Chapter 1: Theoretical contentions and competing literatures Contentions 14 The political economy of policy change 15 Policy and partnership in the economic transformation 19 Ireland’s social partnership in comparative analyses 22 Other literature 24 Part 1: Leaps, Bounds and Reversals, 1945-86 29 Chapter 2: The quest for socio-economic organisation, 1945-70 Irish politics and economic interests before 1945 30 Fits and starts: Irish “tripartitism” 1945-56 36 Lemass’s economic institutionalism 1957-63 40 System stresses: from expansion to dissolution
    [Show full text]
  • SWP Capitulates to the Unite Bureaucracy
    Socialist Fight Issue No. 7 Autumn 2011 Price: Concessions: 50p, Waged: £2.00 Imperialism faces its worst financial, economic and political crises since the 1930s—Page 22 Éirígí demonstrate against the British occupation of the six counties—and Martin McGuiness will welcome the Queen if elected President! Gerry, Ray and Liam Contents Page 17: The mathematics of the imperialist butchers’ terrorism Page 2: Editorial: The Three Principles for Revolutionary Re- Liga Comunista Brazil groupment Page 18: Letters pages Page 3: They threw down the gauntlet and Grangemouth sparks Page 22: Imperialism faces its worst financial, economic and shoved it down their throat! political crises since the 1930s, Statement by the Liaison Com- Page 4: SWP capitulates to the Unite Bureaucracy By A J Byrne: mittee for the Fourth International (LCFI) 15 September 2011 Page 5: The Hounding of Abdul Omer Mohsin by Unite the Union Page 24: The fall of Tripoli reveals the new global balance of By A J Byrne class forces, Statement by the Liaison Committee for the Fourth Page 6: Abdul Omer Mohsin and the Terrible Letter By A J Byrne International 18 September 2011 Page 9: Build the Grass Roots Left on the London buses by Tony Fox Page 25: South Africa's Mini Revolt By Ret Marut Page 10: Report on the Fête de Lutte Ouvrière By Gerry Downing Page 26: Israel’s war on Palestine and the ‘Arab Spring’ By Ret Page 11: The Irish Labour party, austerity measures and lifestyle Marut choices By Charlie Walsh Page 27: Those who ‘howled along with the wolves’ and those Page 13: Marian Price detention illegal! By Michael Holden who took a neutral position on the war in Libya Page 14: Catholic Ghettos Erupt in Face of Orange Provocation Statement by the Liaison Committee for the Fourth International and Police Brutality By C., Dublin 14 September 2011 Page 16: Facebook debate on the Anti-imperialist united front Page 32: The riots, the left and the sectarian By A J Byrne Socialist Fight is produced by the SF Editorial Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Militant Protest and Practices of the State in France and the Federal Republic of Germany, 1968-1977
    Under the Paving Stones: Militant Protest and Practices of the State in France and the Federal Republic of Germany, 1968-1977 Luca Provenzano Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2020 © 2020 Luca Provenzano All Rights Reserved Abstract Under the Paving Stones: Militant Protest and Practices of the State in France and the Federal Republic of Germany, 1968-1977 This dissertation investigates the protest cultures of social revolutionary groups during and after the events of 1968 in France and West Germany before inquiring into how political officials and police responded to the difficulties of maintaining public order. The events of 1968 led revolutionaries in both France and West Germany to adopt new justifications for militant action based in heterodox Marxism and anti-colonial theory, and to attempt to institutionalize new, confrontational modes of public protest that borrowed ways of knowing urban space, tactics, and materials from both the working class and armed guerrilla movements. Self-identifying revolutionaries and left intellectuals also institutionalized forums for the investigation of police interventions in protests on the basis of testimonies, photography, and art. These investigative committees regularly aimed to exploit the resonance of police violence to promote further cycles of politicization. In response, political officials and police sought after 1968 to introduce and to reinforce less ostentatious, allegedly less harmful means of crowd control and dispersion that could inflict suffering without reproducing the spectacle of mass baton assaults and direct physical confrontations—means of physical constraint less susceptible to unveiling as violence.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 INTRODUCTION the United Kingdom Is a Constitutional
    INTRODUCTION The United Kingdom is a constitutional monarchy. The country is governed by the government which is responsible to Parliament. In liberal democracies a representative government can only be facilitated by political parties. The Labour Party is one of the two major parties strong enough to win a general election and form a government. Throughout its history, the Labour Party has undergone numerous policy changes. It came to Parliament in 1900 with only two MPs elected. It represented the working people and stood firmly on the left of the British political spectrum. Now the Labour Party has a majority in Parliament with a total of 356 seats. It has become a “catch-all” party which has decisively cast aside all class-related appeals. The present leader, Tony Blair, has stated clearly that “Labour is the political arm of none other than the British people as a whole” (Dunleavy, 4). The party claims to be a centre-left party, while the critics place it in the centre or even on the right. My thesis takes a close look at how the Labour Party has developed ideologically over time. While following the development of thoughts in the Labour Party I present and comment on the ideas expressed by all those who ideologically influenced the evolution of the Labour Party. The ideas have come from different levels of the party that can be divided into Labour in Parliament and Labour outside Parliament. The former comprises the leadership, ministers and MPs who are members of the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP). The latter is made up of party members organized in Constituency Labour Parties, affiliated trade unions and socialist societies.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MAKING of a PARTY? the International Socialists 1965-1 976
    THE MAKING OF A PARTY? The International Socialists 1965-1 976 Martin Shaw The history of organised marxist politics in Britain, for almost a century, is one of continuous marginality. The number of people involved in marxist parties and organisations of any description has never exceeded a few tens of thousands at any one time. The problem of creating a socialist organisation of real political weight, to the left of the Labour Party, might well seem insoluble. Many have concluded, indeed, that this is so; from the leadership of the Communist Party, with its desire for long-term merger with Labour, and the deep-entry trotskyists of Militant to the thousands of ex-Communists and revolutionary socialists who have joined the Labour Party as individuals. The overall record of failure should not blind us, however, to the real opportunities which have been lost due to the inadequacies of the marxist left itself. To give only the most important example, early British marxism was dominated by a sectarian propagandist tradition, which greatly militated against its achieving any decisive influence, either in the formative period of the modern labour movement, or in the great industrial upheavals just before, during and after the 1914-18 war. Nor should this record allow us to assume that the underlying features of British working-class politics, which have made for the unique dominance of Labourist reformism in the last three-quarters of a century, will never change. On the contrary, there are reasons for believing that they have already begun to be transformed. The 1945-51 period of Labour Government was, in fact, a watershed in working-class politics.
    [Show full text]
  • People's Democracy Began in October 1968 As a Loose Student Protest Movement
    TI3I.S PAMPHLET WAS COMPILED FROM EXISTING P.D. LITERATURE BY THE DUBLIN BRANCH OF THE PEOPLE'S DEMUCRACY IN ORDER TO PROnDE A REFERENCE TO OUR POLITICAL PROGRAMME, AIMS, ATTITUDES AND ACTIVITIES. IT IS HOPZD THAT IT WILL SATISFY THE QUERIES BOTH OF THOSE WISHING TO INFORM THENSELVES ON US, AND OF PROS- PECTI VE MEMBmS. P.D. POLITICAL PROGRAMME THIS POLITICAL PROGRAMME VdAs ADOPTED AT A P.D. CONFERENCE ON SUND~29 NOV '70 The aim of the Peoples Democracy is the establishment of a socialist system of society in Ireland and throughout the world. The first step towards that objective is the establishment of a Workers! and Small Farmers' Republic in the 32 counties of Ireland. But, since complete socialism cannot be established in any One country, or so long as the great imperialist powers like the U.S.A. remain capitalist, the PODowill readily co-operate with and render every ass- istence to socialists in all other countries. Believing that both parts of Ireland to-day suffer from the twin evils of capitalism and imperialism the P.D. is firmly committed to the removal of British troops and Anglo-American economic control from Ireland, and to break- ing the stranglehold of grasping native capitalists over the Irish people* The Viorkers' Republic will be a Society in which all natural re- sources, major industries and financial institutions will be publicly owned and jointly controlled by those mho work in them, or use their products. It will guarantee to each citizen a home, a livelihood and a job, plus an adequate medical and educational service.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Socialist Strategies
    MAPPING SOCIALIST STRATEGIES Reporting Back and Moving Forward August 1-4, 2014 Edith Macy Conference Center 550 Chappaqua Road, Briarcliff Manor, NY Table of Contents Mapping Socialist Strategies Reporting Back and Moving Forward “Business is in Command”...........................................................................................................2 Neoliberalism vs. the Public / the Commons............................................................................4 Exposing Neoliberalism’s Weak Spots.......................................................................................7 Tar Sands and Pipeline Campaigns Along the Canada-U.S. Border........................7 Chicago Teacher’s Union and the Strike of 2012.......................................................7 Austerity, Collapse, and the Rise of the Radical Left in Greece................................8 Jackson, Mississippi: Before and After Chokwe Lumumba.......................................8 Overcoming Fragmentation and Rebuilding the Left..............................................................9 Socialism by Sector....................................................................................................................10 Where Do We Go From Here?..................................................................................................11 Published by the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, New York Office, September 2014 Compiled by James P. Hare Editors: Stefanie Ehmsen and Albert Scharenberg Address: 275 Madison Avenue, Suite 2114, New York,
    [Show full text]