FEDERAL ELECTION POLL NOVEMBER 4, 2000 Jean Chrétien

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FEDERAL ELECTION POLL NOVEMBER 4, 2000 Jean Chrétien FEDERAL ELECTION POLL NOVEMBER 4, 2000 Jean Chrétien (36%) Leads the Other Federal Leaders as the Leader that Canadians Think Would Make the Best Prime Minister of Canada 50% of Canadians Say the "Party's Stand on the Issues" is the Most Important Consideration in Making up their Mind - 26% Say the "Ability of the Party Leaders" and 22% Say the Individual Candidates 55% of Canadians Agree that the Alliance is "Too New and Inexperienced to be Trusted to Run our Government"- 43% Agree that "the Liberals are Arrogant and Need to be Defeated in this Election to be Taught a Lesson" Public Release Date: November 4, 2000 at 6:00 a.m. EST Established in 1979, Ipsos-Reid is Canada’s leading market research and public opinion company. It is best known for the Angus Reid Express poll, the most widely quoted source of public opinion in the country. Founded by Dr. Angus Reid, Ipsos-Reid has conducted extensive market and social research in 80 countries and in 40 languages, and serves clients around the world through more than 300-professionals and 1,000 data collection staff in ten offices. The company is a member of the Paris-based Ipsos Group, ranked among the top ten research companies in the world, with specialties in advertising, media, customer satisfaction, public opinion and market research. Visit www.ipsos-reid.com For copies of other news releases, please visit http://www.angusreid.com/media/content/PRE_REL.cfm © Ipsos-Reid New York ● St. Louis ● Minneapolis ● San Francisco Vancouver ● Calgary ● Winnipeg ● Toronto ● Ottawa ● Montreal FEDERAL ELECTION POLL NOVEMBER 4, 2000 Jean Chrétien (36%) Leads the Other Federal Leaders as the Leader that Canadians Think Would Make the Best Prime Minister of Canada 50% of Canadians Say the "Party's Stand on the Issues" is the Most Important Consideration in Making up their Mind - 26% Say the "Ability of the Party Leaders" and 22% Say the Individual Candidates 55% of Canadians Agree that the Alliance is "Too New and Inexperienced to be Trusted to Run our Government"- 43% Agree that "the Liberals are Arrogant and Need to be Defeated in this Election to be Taught a Lesson" Toronto, Ontario -- Amid a tightening race between the Liberals (42%) and the Alliance (29%) a plurality (36%) of Canadians say that of the current federal party leaders, Jean Chrétien would make the best Prime Minister. When it comes to voting, a majority (50%) say that the party's stand on the issues is the most important consideration when they are making up their mind. A quarter (26%) say that the ability of the party leaders is the most important consideration while just more than one in five (22%) say the qualities of the individual candidates in their constituency is the most important factor in making up their minds. In terms of attitudes towards the parties, 55% of Canadians agree that "the Alliance Party is too new and inexperienced to be trusted to run © Ipsos-Reid New York ● St. Louis ● Minneapolis ● San Francisco Vancouver ● Calgary ● Winnipeg ● Toronto ● Ottawa ● Montreal our government" and 43% agree that "the Liberals are arrogant and need to be defeated in this election to be taught a lesson." These are the findings of an Ipsos-Reid/Globe and Mail/CTV poll conducted between October 27th and November 1st, 2000. The poll is based on a randomly selected sample of 2,500 adult Canadians. The results are accurate to within ± 2.0 percentage points, 19 times out of 20, of what they would have been had the entire Canadian population been surveyed. The margin of error will be larger within regions and for other sub-groupings of the survey population. The data were statistically weighted to ensure the sample's regional and age/sex composition reflects that of the actual Canadian population according to the 1996 Census data. Jean Chrétien (36%) Leads the Other Federal Leaders as the Leader that Canadians Think Would Make the Best Prime Minister of Canada When Canadians are asked regardless of party which of the party leaders would make the best Prime Minister, Jean Chrétien (36%) emerges as the top choice. Stockwell Day (29%) comes in second place while Joe Clark (14%) comes in third. Alexa McDonough is chosen by 8% of Canadians while 6% say Gilles Duceppe. 8% of Canadians say they "don't know." Regionally, Stockwell Day is ahead of Jean Chrétien in BC (44% vs. 30%), Alberta (58% vs. 19%) and Saskatchewan (47% vs. 24%). In contrast, Chrétien is ahead of Day in Ontario (45% vs. 24%), New Brunswick (43% vs. 23%), PEI (52% vs. 19%) and Newfoundland (55% vs. 16%). While Chrétien is ahead in Manitoba, it is the province where the gap between the Liberal and Alliance leaders is the closest (31% for Day, 38% for Chrétien). In Quebec, Chrétien (29%) is still the top choice but in second place is Bloc Leader Gilles Duceppe (21%). A similar situation is evident in Nova Scotia, where Chrétien (41%) is ahead but Joe Clark (20%) and Alexa McDonough (19%) are running neck and neck for second © Ipsos-Reid New York ● St. Louis ● Minneapolis ● San Francisco Vancouver ● Calgary ● Winnipeg ● Toronto ● Ottawa ● Montreal place. Women (38%) are more likely than men (33%) to say that Jean Chrétien would make the best Prime Minister while men (34%) are more likely than women (24%) to say that Stockwell Day would make the best Prime Minister. Younger Canadians (42%) are more likely than middle aged (36%) or older (29%) Canadians to say that Jean Chrétien would make the best Prime Minister. In contrast, older Canadians (34%) are more likely than middle aged (28%) or younger (25%) Canadians to say Stockwell Day would make the best Prime Minister. 50% of Canadians Say the "Party's Stand on the Issues" is the Most Important Consideration in Making up their Mind - 26% Say the "Ability of the Party Leaders" and 22% Say the Individual Candidates When it comes to which of the three following factors: a party's stand on the issues, the party leader or the quality of individual candidates is most important to Canadians in making up their minds, 50% say the party's stand on the issues is the most important. For a quarter (26%) of Canadians the ability of party leaders is the most important consideration, while one in five (22%) say the qualities of individual candidates in their constituencies is the most important consideration. This trend is consistent across almost all provinces. However, Newfoundland distinguishes itself as the only province where the party's stand on the issues is not the most important consideration. Instead, the bulk of Newfoundlanders (44%) say the qualities of the individual candidates is the most important followed by the party's stand on the issues (33%) and finally the ability of the party leaders (22%). © Ipsos-Reid New York ● St. Louis ● Minneapolis ● San Francisco Vancouver ● Calgary ● Winnipeg ● Toronto ● Ottawa ● Montreal 55% of Canadians Agree that the Alliance is "Too New and Inexperienced to be Trusted to Run our Government"- 43% Agree that "the Liberals are Arrogant and Need to be Defeated in this Election to be Taught a Lesson" As the parties jockey for position, the poll tested many of the arguments being made during the campaign. As Stockwell Day and the Alliance begin their first national election campaign, a majority of Canadians (55%) agree with statement "the Alliance Party is just too new and inexperienced to be trusted to run our government" including 29% who say they "strongly agree" and 26% who say they "somewhat agree". Meanwhile, against the backdrop of an early election call, 43% of Canadians agree that "the Liberals are arrogant and need to be defeated in this election to be taught a lesson" (25% "strongly agree", 18% "somewhat agree"). As controversy emerges surrounding the Alliance's healthcare plans, 43% agree with the statement "Stockwell Day and the Alliance have a hidden agenda". This includes 21% who say they "strongly agree" and 23% who "somewhat agree" with the statement. In contrast, less than three in ten (29%) Canadians agree that "Prime Minister Chrétien is too old to perform effectively as Prime Minister for another term" (17% "strongly agree", 12% "somewhat agree"). Interestingly, older Canadians (38%) are much more likely to agree with this statement than middle (28%) or younger (20%) Canadians. Finally, two thirds (66%) of Canadians disagree with the statement "I don't like any of the parties that we have to choose among in this election" (38% "strongly disagree", 28% "somewhat disagree") © Ipsos-Reid New York ● St. Louis ● Minneapolis ● San Francisco Vancouver ● Calgary ● Winnipeg ● Toronto ● Ottawa ● Montreal -30- For more information on this news release, please contact: Darrell Bricker President and COO Public Affairs Ipsos-Reid (416) 324-2900 For full tabular results, please visit our website at www.ipsos-reid.com. © Ipsos-Reid New York ● St. Louis ● Minneapolis ● San Francisco Vancouver ● Calgary ● Winnipeg ● Toronto ● Ottawa ● Montreal.
Recommended publications
  • Chretien Consensus
    End of the CHRÉTIEN CONSENSUS? Jason Clemens Milagros Palacios Matthew Lau Niels Veldhuis Copyright ©2017 by the Fraser Institute. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. The authors of this publication have worked independently and opinions expressed by them are, therefore, their own, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Fraser Institute or its supporters, Directors, or staff. This publication in no way implies that the Fraser Institute, its Directors, or staff are in favour of, or oppose the passage of, any bill; or that they support or oppose any particular political party or candidate. Date of issue: March 2017 Printed and bound in Canada Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data End of the Chrétien Consensus? / Jason Clemens, Matthew Lau, Milagros Palacios, and Niels Veldhuis Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-0-88975-437-9 Contents Introduction 1 Saskatchewan’s ‘Socialist’ NDP Begins the Journey to the Chrétien Consensus 3 Alberta Extends and Deepens the Chrétien Consensus 21 Prime Minister Chrétien Introduces the Chrétien Consensus to Ottawa 32 Myths of the Chrétien Consensus 45 Ontario and Alberta Move Away from the Chrétien Consensus 54 A New Liberal Government in Ottawa Rejects the Chrétien Consensus 66 Conclusions and Recommendations 77 Endnotes 79 www.fraserinstitute.org d Fraser Institute d i ii d Fraser Institute d www.fraserinstitute.org Executive Summary TheChrétien Consensus was an implicit agreement that transcended political party and geography regarding the soundness of balanced budgets, declining government debt, smaller and smarter government spending, and competi- tive taxes that emerged in the early 1990s and lasted through to roughly the mid-2000s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Requisites of Leadership in the Modern House of Commons 1
    Number 4 November 2001 CANADIAN STUDY OF PARLIAMENT GROUP HE EQUISITES OF EADERSHIP THE REQUISITES OF LEADERSHIP IN THE MODERN HOUSE OF COMMONS Paper by: Cristine de Clercy Department of Political Studies University of Saskatchewan Canadian Members of the Study of Parliament Executive Committee Group 2000-2001 The Canadian Study of President Parliament Group (CSPG) was created Leo Doyle with the object of bringing together all those with an interest in parliamentary Vice-President institutions and the legislative F. Leslie Seidle process, to promote understanding and to contribute to their reform and Past President improvement. Judy Cedar-Wilson The constitution of the Canadian Treasurer Study of Parliament Group makes Antonine Campbell provision for various activities, including the organization of conferences and Secretary seminars in Ottawa and elsewhere in James R. Robertson Canada, the preparation of articles and various publications, the Counsellors establishment of workshops, the Dianne Brydon promotion and organization of public William Cross discussions on parliamentary affairs, David Docherty participation in public affairs programs Jeff Heynen on radio and television, and the Tranquillo Marrocco sponsorship of other educational Louis Massicotte activities. Charles Robert Jennifer Smith Membership is open to all those interested in Canadian legislative institutions. Applications for membership and additional information concerning the Group should be addressed to the Secretariat, Canadian Study of Parliament Group, Box 660, West Block, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0A6. Tel: (613) 943-1228, Fax: (613) 995- 5357. INTRODUCTION This is the fourth paper in the Canadian Study of Parliament Groups Parliamentary Perspectives. First launched in 1998, the perspective series is intended as a vehicle for distributing both studies prepared by academics and the reflections of others who have a particular interest in these themes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vitality of Quebec's English-Speaking Communities: from Myth to Reality
    SENATE SÉNAT CANADA THE VITALITY OF QUEBEC’S ENGLISH-SPEAKING COMMUNITIES: FROM MYTH TO REALITY Report of the Standing Senate Committee on Official Languages The Honourable Maria Chaput, Chair The Honourable Andrée Champagne, P.C., Deputy Chair October 2011 (first published in March 2011) For more information please contact us by email: [email protected] by phone: (613) 990-0088 toll-free: 1 800 267-7362 by mail: Senate Committee on Official Languages The Senate of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0A4 This report can be downloaded at: http://senate-senat.ca/ol-lo-e.asp Ce rapport est également disponible en français. Top photo on cover: courtesy of Morrin Centre CONTENTS Page MEMBERS ORDER OF REFERENCE PREFACE INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 1 QUEBEC‘S ENGLISH-SPEAKING COMMUNITIES: A SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE ........................................................... 4 QUEBEC‘S ENGLISH-SPEAKING COMMUNITIES: CHALLENGES AND SUCCESS STORIES ...................................................... 11 A. Community life ............................................................................. 11 1. Vitality: identity, inclusion and sense of belonging ......................... 11 2. Relationship with the Francophone majority ................................. 12 3. Regional diversity ..................................................................... 14 4. Government support for community organizations and delivery of services to the communities ................................
    [Show full text]
  • The 15Th Annual All Politics Poll: the Best and Worst of Federal Politics, by the Hill Times and Angus Reid 1
    THE HILL TIMES, MONDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2011 25 FEATURE: ANNUAL SURVEY & POLITICS The 15th Annual All Politics Poll: The Best and Worst of Federal Politics, By The Hill Times and Angus Reid 1. Who was this year’s most valuable politician? 14. Which former prime minister do you most admire? Former NDP leader Jack Layton 35% Lester B. Pearson 16% Prime Minister Stephen Harper 23% John A. Macdonald 16% Immigration Minister Jason Kenney 10% Pierre Trudeau 15% 2. Who was this year’s least valuable politician? 15. Who was the best Cabinet minister in 2011? Former Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff 25% Immigration Minister Jason Kenney 20% Treasury Board President Tony Clement 11% Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird 18% NDP MP Pat Martin 6% Finance Minister Jim Flaherty 11% 3. Which public figure do you wish had run in the 16. Who was the worst Cabinet minister in 2011? last election? President of the Treasury Board Tony Clement 25% Former Cabinet minister Stockwell Day 7% None 14% Stephen Lewis 5% Minister of International Cooperation Bev Oda 12% Stockwell Day 7% Don Cherry, Mark Carney, Bernard Lord 4% 17. Which Cabinet minister most respects parliament? 4. Who is your favourite up-and-comer politician? None 20% Conservative MP Chris Alexander 7% Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird 8% Conservative MP Ted Opitz 7% Immigration Minister Jason Kenney 8% NDP MP Alexandre Boulerice 5% Conservative MP Kellie Leitch 5% 18. Who is the most approachable member of Cabinet? Liberal MP Justin Trudeau 5% Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird 18% Conservative MP Candice Hoeppner 5% None 13% Immigration Minister Jason Kenney 9% 5.
    [Show full text]
  • What Has He Really Done Wrong?
    The Chrétien legacy Canada was in such a state that it WHAT HAS HE REALLY elected Brian Mulroney. By this stan- dard, William Lyon Mackenzie King DONE WRONG? easily turned out to be our best prime minister. In 1921, he inherited a Desmond Morton deeply divided country, a treasury near ruin because of over-expansion of rail- ways, and an economy gripped by a brutal depression. By 1948, Canada had emerged unscathed, enriched and almost undivided from the war into spent last summer’s dismal August Canadian Pension Commission. In a the durable prosperity that bred our revising a book called A Short few days of nimble invention, Bennett Baby Boom generation. Who cared if I History of Canada and staring rescued veterans’ benefits from 15 King had halitosis and a professorial across Lake Memphrémagog at the years of political logrolling and talent for boring audiences? astonishing architecture of the Abbaye launched a half century of relatively St-Benoît. Brief as it is, the Short History just and generous dealing. Did anyone ll of which is a lengthy prelude to tries to cover the whole 12,000 years of notice? Do similar achievements lie to A passing premature and imperfect Canadian history but, since most buy- the credit of Jean Chrétien or, for that judgement on Jean Chrétien. Using ers prefer their own life’s history to a matter, Brian Mulroney or Pierre Elliott the same criteria that put King first more extensive past, Jean Chrétien’s Trudeau? Dependent on the media, and Trudeau deep in the pack, where last seven years will get about as much the Opposition and government prop- does Chrétien stand? In 1993, most space as the First Nations’ first dozen aganda, what do I know? Do I refuse to Canadians were still caught in the millennia.
    [Show full text]
  • Trudeau Government Adjusting to the New Administration Adjusting Tothe New Administration by DEREK ABMA P
    TWENTY-EIGHTH YEAR, NO. 1403 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSPAPER MONDAY, JANUARY 30, 2017 $5.00 Joe Nancy Sheila Gerry Warren David Michel Jordan Peckford Copps: Nicholls: Kinsella: Drapeau on how where Crane: on the is In Trump’s Trump’s to fi ght Trump are our Canadian the trade America misogyny drains leaders? Forces House swamp tribalism First p. 10 p. 12 p. 9 p. 9 p. 14 p. 15 p. 16 News Trudeau & Trump News Conservative leadership Top job of new Conservative Trudeau government leader to keep progressive, social conservatives united: Tories ‘concerned’ and BY ABBAS RANA conservatives who have been holding their noses for years The next leader of the Conser- and to keep the party united, say vative Party will have to address Conservatives. ‘worried,’ but not frustrations between the social conservatives and progressive Continued on page 18 ‘panicking’ over Trump News Liberal nomination Free Liberal memberships attract administration, say thousands of new members ahead of Ottawa-Vanier nomination BY ABBAS RANA a nomination meeting there, and political insiders the 10 candidates running in this With the incentive of free safe Liberal riding are focused on party membership, Liberal getting as many of these members Trade and security are among the issues Canada has to pay attention Party membership in the riding out as possible on voting day. of Ottawa-Vanier, Ont., has grown to as U.S. President Donald Trump gets started on his agenda. eight times over in anticipation of Continued on page 30 News Lobbying Health most lobbied topic for third straight month BY DEREK ABMA The fi ve topics cited most often in communication reports fi led for Health was the most-lobbied the last month of 2016 were health subject for the third month in with 176 reports, industry with a row in December, according 158, economic development with to the federal lobbyists registry, 141, taxation and fi nance with 123, while topics such as environment and transportation with 121.
    [Show full text]
  • What's Next for the Canadian Alliance?
    Update to Chapter 3: Political Parties and Other Influential Groups What’s Next for the Canadian Alliance? The Canadian Alliance has its first leader in Stockwell Day. His victory over Preston Manning in the leadership vote was something of a surprise. That may mean he should not be underestimated as he tries to become Prime Minister. The next federal election is most likely to be called in the spring of 2001. Day’s Liberal opponent will probably be Prime Minister Chrétien, though there are some who still predict Chrétien will step aside before the next election. In any case, Day’s challenge remains the same. To win power, he must begin by maintaining his base of support in Western Canada. That seems easily achievable. He will try to gain support in Québec and Atlantic Canada, but there’s no evidence he will succeed. Atlantic Canadians generally favour a strong central government, and the Canadian Alliance believes in giving the provinces more powers at the expense of the federal government. In Québec, most races come down to the Liberals and the Bloc Québécois. The Reform Party has never come close to winning a Québec seat. The Alliance has very little to build on in the province. All this means Stockwell Day’s hopes rest in Ontario. The Liberals have won just about every seat in the province for two elections running. Doing that again is no easy task. The Alliance is hoping it can take away enough seats to form a government. The Liberals are likely to portray Stockwell Day as an extremist, out of step with most Canadians on social issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..146 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 098 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, May 13, 2005 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 5957 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, May 13, 2005 The House met at 10 a.m. Parliament on February 23, 2005, and Bill C-48, an act to authorize the Minister of Finance to make certain payments, shall be disposed of as follows: 1. Any division thereon requested before the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, shall be deferred to that time; Prayers 2. At the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, all questions necessary for the disposal of the second reading stage of (1) Bill C-43 and (2) Bill C-48 shall be put and decided forthwith and successively, Ï (1000) without further debate, amendment or deferral. [English] Ï (1010) MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE The Speaker: Does the hon. government House leader have the The Speaker: I have the honour to inform the House that a unanimous consent of the House for this motion? message has been received from the Senate informing this House Some hon. members: Agreed. that the Senate has passed certain bills, to which the concurrence of this House is desired. Some hon. members: No. Mr. Jay Hill (Prince George—Peace River, CPC): Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents STOCKWELL DAY’S MISALLIANCE Introduction .......................................................................................................... 5 An Image Problem ................................................................................................ 7 The Best Laid Plans................................................................................................8 Four Points of View..............................................................................................12 Discussion, Research, and Essay Questions ..........................................................16 STOCKWELL DAY’S MISALLIANCE Introduction Just over a year after his dramatic entrance The months following the election pre- into federal politics, Canadian Alliance sented Day with one headache after another. leader Stockwell Day was facing an uncer- An embarrassing character-defamation tain political future in the summer of 2001. lawsuit brought against him by an Alberta The former Alberta provincial Cabinet lawyer, questions about the responsibility for minister had been the focus of great hopes the province’s taxpayers for paying his legal and expectations among many on Canada’s bills arising from it, allegations that the party political right as the dynamic new leader who had hired a spy to investigate the Liberals, might be able to wrest power from Jean and intemperate attacks on the actions of a Chrétien’s governing Liberals. Day had Quebec judge all focused considerable easily won the Alliance leadership race over negative attention on Day and cast further former Reform Party chief Preston Manning doubts on his leadership. But all of these in July 2000 and took his seat in the House of problems paled in comparison to the full- Commons following a by-election win in scale party revolt that erupted in April 2001, British Columbia two months later. But when some of his most senior MPs an- within weeks of his arrival in Ottawa, nounced that they had lost confidence in his Chrétien had called a federal election, and ability to lead the Alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..31 Journalweekly (PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00)
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 38th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION 38e LÉGISLATURE, 1re SESSION Journals Journaux No. 134 No 134 Friday, October 7, 2005 Le vendredi 7 octobre 2005 10:00 a.m. 10 heures PRAYERS PRIÈRE GOVERNMENT ORDERS ORDRES ÉMANANT DU GOUVERNEMENT The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Mitchell La Chambre reprend l'étude de la motion de M. Mitchell (Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food), seconded by Mr. Brison (ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Agroalimentaire), appuyé par M. (Minister of Public Works and Government Services), — That Bill Brison (ministre des Travaux publics et des Services S-38, An Act respecting the implementation of international trade gouvernementaux), — Que le projet de loi S-38, Loi concernant commitments by Canada regarding spirit drinks of foreign la mise en oeuvre d'engagements commerciaux internationaux pris countries, be now read a second time and referred to the par le Canada concernant des spiritueux provenant de pays Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food. étrangers, soit maintenant lu une deuxième fois et renvoyé au Comité permanent de l'agriculture et de l'agroalimentaire. The debate continued. Le débat se poursuit. The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to. La motion, mise aux voix, est agréée. Accordingly, Bill S-38, An Act respecting the implementation En conséquence, le projet de loi S-38, Loi concernant la mise en of international trade commitments by Canada regarding spirit oeuvre d'engagements commerciaux internationaux pris par le drinks of foreign countries, was read the second time and referred Canada concernant des spiritueux provenant de pays étrangers, est to the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bloc Québécois As a Party in Parliament a Thesis Submitted To
    A New Approach to the Study of a New Party: The Bloc Québécois as a Party in Parliament A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Masters of Arts In the Department of Political Studies University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By James Cairns September 2003 Copyright James Cairns, 2003. All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Graduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professors who supervised my thesis work, or in their absence, by the Head of the Department of Political Studies or the Dean of the College of Graduate Studies and Research. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of Political Studies University of Saskatchewan 9 Campus Drive Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5A5 ii ABSTRACT Since forming a parliamentary party in 1994, the Bloc Québécois has been interpreted exclusively as the formal federal manifestation of the Québec separatist movement.
    [Show full text]
  • PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 025 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, November 16, 2004 (Part A) Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1369 HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, November 16, 2004 The House met at 10 a.m. months in jail for preying on children while the damage caused to the victims often lasts a lifetime. The bill refers to the victim as a person under the age of 16. Prayers Carrie's guardian angel law carries a minimum sentence of life imprisonment in cases of sexual assault on a child that involves repeated assaults, multiple victims, repeat offences, more than one ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS offender, an element of confinement or kidnapping or an offender Ï (1000) who is in a position of trust with respect to the child. [Translation] Under the provisions of the bill an offender would be ineligible for ORDER IN COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS a parole for 20 years. Hon. Dominic LeBlanc (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present a number of order in It is time that those who harm our children are locked away for a council appointments made by the government. long time. *** (Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed) Ï (1005) [English] *** DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT Ï (1010) Hon. R.
    [Show full text]