Expedition 371 Methods1 1 Introduction 6 Lithostratigraphy 14 Biostratigraphy and R
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Sutherland, R., Dickens, G.R., Blum, P., and the Expedition 371 Scientists Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program Volume 371 publications.iodp.org https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.371.102.2019 Contents Expedition 371 methods1 1 Introduction 6 Lithostratigraphy 14 Biostratigraphy and R. Sutherland, G.R. Dickens, P. Blum, C. Agnini, L. Alegret, G. Asatryan, paleoenvironment J. Bhattacharya, A. Bordenave, L. Chang, J. Collot, M.J. Cramwinckel, E. Dallanave, 44 Paleomagnetism M.K. Drake, S.J.G. Etienne, M. Giorgioni, M. Gurnis, D.T. Harper, H.-H.M. Huang, 46 Petrophysics A.L. Keller, A.R. Lam, H. Li, H. Matsui, H.E.G. Morgans, C. Newsam, Y.-H. Park, 53 Geochemistry K.M. Pascher, S.F. Pekar, D.E. Penman, S. Saito, W.R. Stratford, T. Westerhold, and 56 Stratigraphic correlation X. Zhou2 57 Age model and sedimentation rates 57 References Keywords: International Ocean Discovery Program, IODP, JOIDES Resolution, Expedition 371, Site U1506, Site U1507, Site U1508, Site U1509, Site U1510, Site U1511, Tasman Frontier, Zealandia, Reinga, Challenger, Eastern Australian Current, Lord Howe, Murihiku, New Caledonia, Norfolk, Northland, Pacific, Ring of Fire, Tasman, Taranaki, Tonga, Kermadec, Waka Nui, Wanganella, subduction, Early Eocene Climatic Optimum, EECO, Middle Eocene Climatic Optimum, MECO, biogenic bloom, stratigraphy, diagenesis, compaction, volcanism Introduction tional input from the GPS and triangulation to the seafloor beacon, weighted by the estimated positional accuracy. The final hole posi- The procedures and tools employed in drilling operations and in tion was the mean position calculated from GPS data collected over the various shipboard laboratories of the R/V JOIDES Resolution are a significant portion of the time the hole was occupied. documented here for International Ocean Discovery Program Drilling sites were numbered according to the series that began (IODP) Expedition 371. This information applies only to shipboard with the first site drilled by the Glomar Challenger in 1968. Starting work described in the Expedition reports section of the Expedition with Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Expedition 301, the prefix 371 Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program vol- “U” designates sites occupied by the JOIDES Resolution. ume. Methods for shore-based analyses of Expedition 371 samples When drilling multiple holes at a site, hole locations are typically and data will be described in separate individual publications. This offset from each other by ~20 m. A letter suffix distinguishes each introductory section of the methods chapter describes procedures hole drilled at the same site. The first hole drilled is assigned the site and equipment used for drilling, coring, core handling, sample reg- number modified by the suffix “A,” the second hole takes the site istration, computation of depth for samples and measurements, and number and the suffix “B,” and so forth. During Expedition 371, 11 the sequence of shipboard analyses. Subsequent methods sections holes were drilled at 6 sites (U1506–U1511). describe laboratory procedures and instruments in more detail. Unless otherwise noted, all depths in this volume refer to the Coring and drilling strategy core depth below seafloor, Method A (CSF-A), depth scale. The coring strategy for Expedition 371 consisted primarily of penetrating as deeply as required to meet tectonic objectives at each Operations site and secondarily of coring multiple holes in sections suitable for Site locations and holes paleoceanographic objectives. At five of the six sites, the original GPS coordinates from site survey cruises were used to position plan called for one or two holes to be cored with the full-length ad- the vessel at all Expedition 371 sites. A SyQuest Bathy 2010 CHIRP vanced piston corer (APC), and possibly the half-length APC subbottom profiler was used to monitor the seafloor depth on the (HLAPC) system, to refusal and then to deepen the holes with the approach to each site and confirm depths suggested from precruise extended core barrel (XCB) system to ~500 to ~700 m. One site surveys. Once the vessel was positioned at a site, the thrusters were (U1506) was scheduled from the start to use the rotary core barrel lowered and a positioning beacon was dropped to the seafloor at (RCB) system. However, we ended up drilling more with the RCB most sites. Dynamic positioning control of the vessel used naviga- system and less with the APC/XCB system due to hard formations 1 Sutherland, R., Dickens, G.R., Blum, P., Agnini, C., Alegret, L., Asatryan, G., Bhattacharya, J., Bordenave, A., Chang, L., Collot, J., Cramwinckel, M.J., Dallanave, E., Drake, M.K., Etienne, S.J.G., Giorgioni, M., Gurnis, M., Harper, D.T., Huang, H.-H.M., Keller, A.L., Lam, A.R., Li, H., Matsui, H., Morgans, H.E.G., Newsam, C., Park, Y.-H., Pascher, K.M., Pekar, S.F., Penman, D.E., Saito, S., Stratford, W.R., Westerhold, T., Zhou, X., 2019. Expedition 371 methods. In Sutherland, R., Dickens, G.R., Blum, P., and the Expedition 371 Scientists, Tasman Frontier Subduc- tion Initiation and Paleogene Climate. Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program, 371: College Station, TX (International Ocean Discovery Program). https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.371.102.2019 2 Expedition 371 Scientists’ affiliations. MS 371-102: Published 2 February 2019 This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. R. Sutherland et al. Expedition 371 methods Figure F1. Coring systems and logging tool strings used during Expedition 371. Hole Hole Hole Hole Hole U1507B Hole Hole Hole U1508C Hole Hole Hole Hole Hole U1506A U1507A U1507B tool string U1508A U1508B U1508C tool string U1509A U1510A U1510B U1511A U1511B 0 100 200 300 400 Depth CSF-A (m) 500 600 Coring: APC 700 XCB RCB Logging: 800 (Modified) triple combo and time constraints (Figure F1), and only one 66 m thick section at deployed, except when refusal appears imminent. Formation tem- Site U1510 was double APC cored for paleoceanographic studies. perature measurements can be taken with the advanced piston corer temperature tool (APCT-3), embedded in the APC coring JOIDES Resolution standard coring systems shoe, at specified intervals. These measurements can be used to ob- The APC and HLAPC coring systems cut soft-sediment cores tain temperature gradients and heat flow estimates. with minimal coring disturbance relative to other IODP coring sys- The XCB is a rotary system with a small cutting shoe that ex- tems and are suitable for the upper portion of each hole. After the tends below the large rotary APC/XCB bit. The smaller bit can cut a APC core barrel is lowered through the drill pipe and lands near the semi-indurated core with less torque and fluid circulation than the bit, the inside of the drill pipe is pressured up until one or two shear main bit, optimizing recovery. The XCB cutting shoe (bit) extends pins that hold the inner barrel attached to the outer barrel fail. The ~30.5 cm ahead of the main bit in soft sediment but retracts into the inner barrel then advances into the formation at high speed and main bit when hard formations are encountered. It cuts cores with a cuts a core with a diameter of 66 mm (2.6 inches). The driller can nominal diameter of 5.87 cm (2.312 inches), slightly less than the 6.6 detect a successful cut, or “full stroke,” from the pressure gauge on cm diameter of APC cores. XCB cores are often broken (torqued) the rig floor. The depth limit of the APC system, often referred to as into “biscuits,” which are disc-shaped pieces a few to several centi- APC refusal, is indicated in two ways: (1) the piston fails to achieve meters long with remolded sediment (including some drilling a complete stroke (as determined from the pump pressure reading) slurry) interlayering the discs in a horizontal direction and packing because the formation is too hard or (2) excessive force (>60,000 lb; the space between the discs and the core liner in a vertical direction. ~267 kN) is required to pull the core barrel out of the formation. This type of drilling disturbance may give the impression that the When a full stroke is not achieved, typically additional attempts are XCB cores have the same thickness (66 mm) as the APC cores. Al- made. The assumption is that the barrel penetrated the formation though both XCB and RCB core recovery (below) generally lead to by the length of core recovered (nominal recovery of ~100%), so the drilling disturbance in similar sedimentary material, switching from bit is advanced by that length before cutting the next core. When a an APC/XCB bottom-hole assembly (BHA) to an RCB BHA re- full or partial stroke is achieved but excessive force cannot retrieve quires a pipe trip. the barrel, the core barrel is “drilled over,” meaning after the inner The RCB system is the most conventional rotary coring system core barrel is successfully shot into the formation, the drill bit is ad- and is suitable for lithified rock material. During Expedition 371, it vanced by the length of the APC barrel (~9.6 m). Typically, nonmag- also became the coring system of choice for semilithified material netic core barrels are used, and a downhole orientation tool is (chalk) because the depth objectives were seemingly out of reach of IODP Proceedings 2Volume 371 R. Sutherland et al. Expedition 371 methods the XCB system. Like the XCB system, the RCB system cuts a core Core and section handling with a nominal diameter of 5.87 cm. RCB coring can be done with Whole core handling or without the core liners used routinely with the APC/XCB soft- All APC, XCB, and RCB cores recovered during Expedition 371 sediment systems.