DOCSLIB.ORG

OECD Review of Policies to Improve the Effectiveness of Resource Use in Schools (School Resources Review)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OECD Review of Policies to Improve the Effectiveness of Resource Use in Schools (School Resources Review) OECD Review of Policies to Improve the Effectiveness of Resource Use in Schools (School Resources Review) COUNTRY BACKGROUND REPORT FOR LITHUANIA National Agency for School Evaluation May 2015 The OECD and the European Commission (EC) have established a partnership for the Project, whereby participation costs of countries that are part of the European Union’s Erasmus+ program are partly covered. The participation of Lithuania was organised with the support of the EC in the context of this partnership. This report was prepared by the Policy Analysis Unit of the National Agency for School Evaluation under the auspices of the Ministry of Education and Science of Lithuania as an input to the OECD Review of Policies to Improve the Effectiveness of Resource Use in Schools (School Resources Review). The document was prepared in response to guidelines the OECD provided to all countries. The opinions expressed are not those of the OECD or its Member countries. Further information about the OECD Review is available at http://www.oecd.org/education/schoolresourcesreview Data and information providers: Association of Local Authorities in Lithuania Centre of Information Technologies in Education Department of General Education and Vocational Training, Ministry of Education and Science Education Development Centre Education Supply Centre Education Quality and Regional Policy Department, Ministry of Education and Science Finance Department, Ministry of Education and Science National Examination Centre TABLE OF CONTENTS List of abbreviations ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Glossary and key concepts ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER 1: THE NATIONAL CONTEXT ................................................................................................... 14 1.1 Economic and social background..................................................................................................... 14 1.2 Demographic development ............................................................................................................... 14 1.3 Political background ......................................................................................................................... 15 1.4 Public sector management ................................................................................................................ 16 CHAPTER 2: THE SCHOOL SYSTEM ............................................................................................................ 18 2.1 Organisation of the school system .................................................................................................... 18 2.2 Education environment ..................................................................................................................... 21 2.3 Objectives of the education system and student learning objectives ............................................ 24 2.4 Distribution of responsibilities within the school system ............................................................... 25 2.5 Market mechanisms in the school system ....................................................................................... 27 2.6 Performance of the school system .................................................................................................... 28 2.7 Policy approaches to equity in education ........................................................................................ 36 2.8 Main challenges ................................................................................................................................. 38 CHAPTER 3: GOVERNANCE OF RESOURCE USE IN SCHOOLS ...................................................... 39 3.1 Level of resources and policy concerns ........................................................................................... 39 3.2 Sources of revenue ............................................................................................................................. 42 3.3 Planning of resource use ................................................................................................................... 45 3.4 Implementation of policies to improve the effectiveness of resource use ..................................... 48 3.5 Main challenges ................................................................................................................................. 48 CHAPTER 4: RESOURCE DISTRIBUTION .................................................................................................. 50 4.1 Distribution of resources between levels of the education administration ................................... 50 4.2 Distribution of financial resources across resource types .............................................................. 52 4.3 Distribution of resources between levels and sectors of the school system .................................. 53 4.4 Distribution of resources across individual schools........................................................................ 55 4.5 Distribution of school facilities and materials ................................................................................. 57 4.6 Distribution of teacher resources ..................................................................................................... 65 4.7 Distribution of school leaders ........................................................................................................... 68 4.8 Distribution across specific student groups .................................................................................... 71 4.9 Main challenges ................................................................................................................................. 72 CHAPTER 5: RESOURCE UTILIZATION ..................................................................................................... 74 5.1 Matching resources to individual student learning needs ............................................................. 74 5.2 Organisation of student learning time ............................................................................................. 76 5.3 Allocation of teacher resources to students ..................................................................................... 79 5.4 Organisation of school leadership .................................................................................................... 85 5.5 Teaching and learning environment within school ........................................................................ 89 5.6 Use of school facilities and materials ............................................................................................... 92 5.7 Organisation of education governance ............................................................................................ 92 5.8 Main challenges ................................................................................................................................. 97 CHAPTER 6: RESOURCE MANAGEMENT.................................................................................................. 98 6.1 Capacity building for resource management .................................................................................. 98 6.2 Monitoring of resource use ............................................................................................................... 99 2 6.3 Transparency and reporting .......................................................................................................... 101 6.4 Incentives for effective resource use .............................................................................................. 102 6.5 Main challenges ............................................................................................................................... 103 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................................105 APPENDICES .........................................................................................................................................................111 Appendix 1. Long-term unemployment rate ....................................................................................... 111 Appendix 2. Esf-funded projects ......................................................................................................... 111 Appendix 3. Institutions of the state power ......................................................................................... 113 Appendix 4. The lithuanian classification of education ..................................................................... 114 Appendix 5. The school network .......................................................................................................... 115 Appendix 6. Data on household expenditure ...................................................................................... 117 Appendix 7. Structure of the ministry of education and science ....................................................... 119 Appendix 8. National institutions forquality assurance ....................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review of Energy Efficiency Policies in Lithuania
    J. Vasauskaite, D. Streimikiene 628 ISSN 1648 - 4460 Problems and Prospects of Different Industry Sectors ---------TRANSFORMATIONS IN -------- Vasauskaite, J., Streimikiene, D. (2014), “Review of Energy Efficiency BUSINESS & ECONOMICS Policies in Lithuania”, Transformations in Business & Economics, Vol. 13, No 3C (33C), pp.628-642. © Vilnius University, 2002-2014 © Brno University of Technology, 2002-2014 © University of Latvia, 2002-2014 REVIEW OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY POLICIES IN LITHUANIA 1Jovita Vasauskaite 2Dalia Streimikiene Department of economics Department of Business School of economics and Economics and Management business Kaunas Faculty of Humanities KaunasUniversity of Vilnius University Technology Muitinės str. 8 K. Donelaicio str. 20 LT – 44280 Kaunas LT-44239 Kaunas Lithuania Lithuania Tel.: +370 37 401 958 Tel.:+370 37 300 550 E-mail:[email protected] E-mail: [email protected] 1Jovita Vasauskaite holds PhD in Economics. She is associated professor at Kaunas University of Technology. Currently J. Vasauskaite works as a postdoctoral fellow in Lithuanian Energy Institute. The researcher has experience in the projects related to corporate social and environmental responsibility, entrepreneurial competence. Her main research fields are: new technology implementation, energy efficiency development in industry. She has published around 15 articles in indexed international data basis. 2Dalia Streimikiene, PhD, is a senior research fellow at the Social cultural institute of Kaunas Faculty of Humanities, Vilnius University. The main areas of research are: environmental policy, energy policy and economic tools of environmental regulation in energy sector. Prof. Dr. Dalia Streimikiene holds PhD in Economics. She is professor and Leading Research Associate at Vilnius University Kaunas Faculty of Humanities. D. Streimikiene has experience in various projects related to sustainable development, environmental and climate change mitigation policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Russ Pan- Balt Sia En -Natio Tic Ne
    CAN UNCLASSIFIED RUSSIA ENGAGING WITH ITS ‘COMPATRIOTS’: PAN-NATIONALISM AND RELATIOONS WITH THE BALTIC NEIGHBOURS Timothy J. Colton Harvard University Anthony B. Seaboyer Royal Military College of Canada Prepared by: Anthony Seaboyer Royal Military College of Canada, Department of Political Science, National Defence P.O. Box 17000, Station Forces Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7K 7B4 PA 18002 Technical Authority: Matthew Lauder Contractor's date of publication: March 2020 The body of this CAN UNCLASSIFIED document does not contain the required security banners according to DND security standards. However, it must be treated as CAN UNCLASSIFIED and protected appropriately based on the terms and conditions specified on the covering page. Defence Research and Development Canada Contract Report DRDC-RDDC-2020-C052 March 2020 CAN UNCLASSIFIED CAN UNCLASSIFIED IMPORTANT INFORMATIVE STATEMENTS This document was reviewed for Controlled Goods by Defence Research and Development Canada using the Schedule to the Defence Production Act. Disclaimer: This document is not published by the Editorial Office of Defence Research and Development Canada, an agency of the Department of National Defence of Canada but is to be catalogued in the Canadian Defence Information System (CANDIS), the national repository for Defence S&T documents. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (Department of National Defence) makes no representations or warranties, expressed or implied, of any kind whatsoever, and assumes no liability for the accuracy, reliability, completeness, currency or usefulness of any information, product, process or material included in this document. Nothing in this document should be interpreted as an endorsement for the specific use of any tool, technique or process examined in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia 6%According to the IMF Forecasts
    Report at the Constituency Meeting: Economic Crisis, Public Spending, Privatization, Migration and EU Eastern Partnership Policy by Vasyl Shylov [email protected] 10-11 May 2012 Table of contents Economic crisis and its impact on the Constituency s countries, causes of the crisis Deepening of social stratification Economic crisis and rising public debt Austerity imposed by the IMF and EU Wages, wage gap between men and women Unemployment Economic and social role of public spending Crisis and emigration Acceleration of privatization Crisis and public sector reforms Upcoming parliamentary elections and social policy Quality public services Social dialogue Projects Association Agreement Translations Economic crisis and forecasts of economic growth in the Constituency s countries in 2012 Armenia 6-7% Belarus 0%according to Belorussian independent experts 1.5%according to the EBRD, 5.5%according to the government. In 2011, Belarus had the highest inflation in the last 10 years. During the year, consumer prices rose by 108.7%, while the projected social and economic development index was 7.5-8.5%. In 2012, the government plans to keep inflation within 19%. Georgia 6%according to the IMF forecasts. In 2011, GDP growth for the full year was 6.8%. In the state budget of Georgia 2012 GDP growth forecast is specified at 5% Latvia 1.3% according to the Review of Macroeconomic Developments of the Bank of Latvia. Expert Evgeniya Zaitseva said: Industrial production and exports are rising. In general due to price rather than volume growth. The government demonstrates optimism: the peak of the crisis is overcome. The Prime Minister Valdis Dombrovskis and troubadour of neoliberalism Anders Aslund wrote the book How did Latvia overcome the financial crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FIRST EUROPIEN BASKETBALL SUMMER CAMP ROTARY CLUB “ROMUVA” and ARVYDAS SABONIS BASKETBALL CENTER District 1460 - Lithuania
    THE FIRST EUROPIEN BASKETBALL SUMMER CAMP ROTARY CLUB “ROMUVA” AND ARVYDAS SABONIS BASKETBALL CENTER District 1460 - Lithuania Date: 10th – 20th August, 2013. Host Club: Lithuanian Rotary club “Romuva”, District 1460, Club No. 64057. Arrival/Departure: Kaunas Airport (preferable), from where pick-up will be arranged. Vilnius Airport is as alternative, with additional instruction how to come to Kaunas. Location: City of Kaunas. Participants: Number of participants - 12 maximum. Only boys are invited. One from each country. Candidates should: Be playing basketball, Have a certificate or recommendation from basketball school or institution, Send us a few personal photos with a moments from the competition, training, etc., Have a recommendation to the city or county Rotary club. Age: From 14 to 17 years. Accommodation: In student hostel and host families. Language: English. Program: Varied program including basketball trainings in one of the most modern basketball centers in Europe "Arvydas Sabonis Basketball Center", outdoor activities and excursions to local places (industry, culture, etc.) Clothing: Sports footwear and clothing, cap to protect from the sun and general accessories going near water or swimming in the pool, warmer clothes (wind jacket, sweater) and good shoes. Food: Traditional Lithuanian and international food. Please inform us if you have any restrictions in type of food. Insurance: Participants must be insured against illness, accidents and third party liabilities according to Rotary International recommendations. Acceptance: We expect to receive applications with following requirement Costs: 100 € Camp fee Plus flight tickets to arrival point and back & Insurance. Catering, accommodation, museums and training costs are covered by Lithuanian Rotary organization and host Rotary club ”Romuva”.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Formation and Development Studies
    KLAIPĖDA UNIVERSITY SOCIAL SCIENCE FACULTY REGIONAL FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Social Sciences No. 3 (8) Klaipėda, 2012 Regional Formation and Development Studies Klaipėda University Social Science Faculty Scientific Editor Prof. Dr. Antanas Bučinskas Klaipėda University (Lithuania) Deputy of scientific editor Prof. Dr. Ligita Šimanskienė Klaipėda University (Lithuania) Editorial board: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ciprian Beniamin Benea University of Oradea (Romania) Prof. Habil. Dr. Remigijus Čiegis Vilnius University (Lithuania) Prof. Dr. Larisa Emeljanova I. Kant Federal University (Russia Federation) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sebastian Gadal University of Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines (France) Prof. Dr. Hilmar Þór Hilmarsson University of Acureyri (Iceland) Prof. Dr. Vytautas Juščius Klaipėda University (Lithuania) Prof. Dr. Jose Manuel Lasierra Zaragoza University (Spain) Prof. Dr. Vaidutis Laurėnas Klaipėda University (Lithuania) Prof. Habil. Dr. Tadeusz Palmowski Gdansk University (Poland) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Romana Provazniková Pardubice University (Czech Republic) Prof. Habil. Dr. Bronislaw Sitek Alicide De Gasperi University (Poland) Prof. Dr. Biruta Sloka Latvia University (Latvia) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Eduardas Spiriajevas Klaipėda University (Lithuania) Prof. Dr. Rimantas Stašys Klaipėda University (Lithuania) Prof. Habil. Dr. Gerhard Strohmeier Alpen-Adria Universitat Klagenfurt (Austria) Prof. Habil. Dr. Stasys Vaitekūnas Klaipėda University (Lithuania) Prof. Habil. Dr. Povilas Zakarevičius Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania) Lithuanian language editor: Vilma Urbonavičiūtė (Lithuania) Layout: Karolis Saukantas (Lithuania) Cover design: Vilhelmas Giedraitis (Lithuania) The first number was published in 2007. There are 3 annual volumes in Lithuanian, English languages. The first numbers of journal were included in EBSCO Publishing Business Source Complete databases (http://www.ebscohost.com/titleLists/bth-journals.pdf.). Address: Herkaus Manto g. 84, LT-92294 Klaipėda, Lietuva, tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithuania Country Report: Social Impact Of
    On behalf of the European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Social Impact of Emigration and Rural-Urban Migration in Central and Eastern Europe Final Country Report Lithuania April 2012 Authors: Dovilė Krupickaitė Arūnas Poviliūnas Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission may be held responsible for the use that may be made of the information contained in this publication. Social Impact of Emigration and Rural-Urban Migration in Central and Eastern Europe VT/2010/001 Content 1. Socio-Economic and Political Overview ............................................................................. 3 2. Main emigration and internal migration trends and patterns............................................... 5 2.1. Main emigration trends................................................................................................ 5 2.2. Main internal migration trends ..................................................................................... 8 2.3. Main characteristics of migrants .................................................................................. 9 3. Nation-wide labour market and social development trends under the influence of emigration ............................................................................................................................10 3.1. Economic and labour market developments ...............................................................10 3.2. Social security ............................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impact of International Second-Rate Mega-Sporting Events on Tourism: Case Study of Eurobasket 2011 in Lithuania Prof
    34 SPORTO MOKSLAS / 2017, Nr. 2(88), ISSN 1392-1401 / eISSN 2424-3949 Sporto mokslas / Sport Science 2017, Nr. 2(88), p. 34–47 / No. 2(88), pp. 34–47, 2017 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15823/sm.2017.17 Economic impact of international second-rate mega-sporting events on tourism: case study of EuroBasket 2011 in Lithuania Prof. Dr. Ramūnas Povilanskas, Dr. Vytė Kontautienė Klaipėda University Summary According to Zipf’s Law, the scale (frequency, abundance, strength, popularity, etc.) of many real-world phenomena increases or decreases logarithmically depending on the class, rank, or weight of the studied phenomenon. This law also applies to the popularity and attendance of mega-sporting events; therefore, it is pertinent for the assessment of an economic impact of the event. If this peculiar feature of mega-sporting events is ignored, any accurate forecast of the popularity of the event and the assessment of its economic impact becomes difficult. The paper illustrates this thesis by highlighting the economic impact of the European Basketball Championship, held in Lithuania in 2011, upon the tourism and hospitality industry in this country. The aim of the study was to assess the applicability of Zipf’s Law in the case of mega-sporting events by surveying the popularity and economic effect of international second-rate sport event such as the European Basketball Championship, which was held in a small peripheral country, Lithuania. The ethnographic survey was based on a series of semi-structured in-depth face-to-face interviews (Tribe, 2010). It was conducted from August to September in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Policy Audit: Ukraine- Lithuania
    Olena Betlii FOREIGN POLICY AUDIT: UKRAINE- LITHUANIA DISCUSSION PAPER Olena Betlii FOREIGN POLICY AUDIT: UKRAINE- LITHUANIA DISCUSSION PAPER Кyiv 2016 This report was conducted within the project of the Institute of World Policy “Ukraine’s Foreign Policy Audit” with financial support of the Embassy of the Lithuanian Republic in Ukraine. The contents are those of the Institute of World Policy and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Lithuanian Government. No part of this research may be reproduced or transferred in any form or by any means, graphic, electronic, or including photocopying or by any information storage retrieval system, without the proper reference to the original source. Photos: Presidential Administration of Ukraine Author: Olena Betlii Рroject coordinator: Kateryna Zarembo © 2016, Institute of World Policy CONTENTS 1. Introduction 4 This report was conducted within the project of the Institute of World Policy 2. Interests of Ukraine toward Lithuania “Ukraine’s Foreign Policy Audit” with financial support of the Embassy of the and Interests of Lithuania toward Ukraine 12 Lithuanian Republic in Ukraine. 2.1. Back to the Past: the Grand Duchy of Lithuania as a Space of Common Historical Heritage 12 The contents are those of the Institute of World Policy and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Lithuanian Government. No part of this research may be 2.2. The EU as a Landmark for the Bilateral Cooperation: Reforms, reproduced or transferred in any form or by any means, graphic, electronic, or Investments, Energy Independence including photocopying or by any information storage retrieval system, without 16 the proper reference to the original source.
    [Show full text]
  • Differences in Anthropometrics Characteristics and Body
    Int. J. Morphol., 38(6):1528-1534, 2020. Differences in Anthropometrics Characteristics and Body Composition Between Two Elite Youth Male Basketball National Teams – Participants at U18 European Championship 2019 Diferencias en las Características Antropométricas y la Composición Corporal entre dos Equipos Nacio- nales de Baloncesto Masculino Juvenil de Élite - Participantes en el Campeonato de Europa U18 2019 Milovan Ljubojevic1,2; Danilo Bojanic1; Dragan Krivokapic1; Aldijana Nokic1 & Nina Dukanovic3 LJUBOJEVIC, M.; BOJANIC, D.; KRIVOKAPIC, D.; NOKIC, A. & DUKANOVIC, N. Differences in anthropometrics characteristics and body composition between two elite youth male basketball national teams – participants at U18 European Championship 2019. Int. J. Morphol., 38(6):1528-1534, 2020. SUMMARY: The aim of this research was to determine the differences among the male basketball players of the National team of Montenegro U18 and the National team of Republic of North Macedonia, in terms of their anthropometric characteristics and body composition. A sample of 27 subjects was divided into two sub-samples. The first sub-sample of the subjects consisted of 15 players of the National team of Montenegro, average age 17.6±0.63, while the other sub-sample consisted of 12 players of the National team of Republic of North Macedonia, average age of 17.17± 0.72. All players were tested in Podgorica, in lasting period of two days, while they held preparations for the European Championship. Anthropometric characteristics and body composition were evaluated by a battery of eleven variables: body height (cm), body weight (kg), triceps skinfold, back skinfold, biceps skinfold, abdominal skinfold, thigh skinfold, calf skinfold, body mass index (BMI), percentage of fat and muscle mass (kg).
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Policy of Combating Domestic Violence in Georgia and Lithuania
    The Social Policy of Combating Domestic Violence in Georgia and Lithuania dr. Lina ŠUMSKAITĖ Vilnius University Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Social Work Universiteto Str. 9/1, LT-01513, Vilnius, Lithuania +370 5 2667610, +370 5 2667610 [email protected] dr. Salome NAMICHEISHVILI Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Departament of Sociology and Social Work TSU Building/Block 6, Ilia Chavchavadze Ave No. 8, Tbilisi, Georgia (+995 32) 225 17 35 [email protected] Summary. Domestic violence is perceived as one of the most severe violations of human rights and gender inequality. It has negative psychological, social and economic impact on the victim. In seeking to combat violence of an intimate partner, laws against domestic violence were implemented in many European countries. Two countries, Lithuania and Georgia, are compared in the article. Even if they have different locations and patriarchal traditions, the common past of belonging to Soviet Union unites them. The article compares the political measures and their impact on the solution of the domestic violence problem. Even the laws criminalizing domestic violence were implemented in 2006 in Georgia and in 2011 in Lithuania. The problem of domestic violence remains a top issue in both countries. The amount of reported domestic violence events maintains a high level; however, the investigated cases level remains low. Still, a high level of unreported domestic violence cases remain in both countries. Insufficient shelters for women victims of violence remain a problem in both countries. Keywords: domestic violence, social work, social policy. Introduction Domestic violence is one of the type of gender based violence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Third Energy Package Gas Directive (2009/73/Ec): Compliance in Lithuania and Romania
    THE THIRD ENERGY PACKAGE GAS DIRECTIVE (2009/73/EC): COMPLIANCE IN LITHUANIA AND ROMANIA BY ILIAS MARKOS BOLARIS THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in European Union Studies in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2016 Urbana, Illinois Master’s Committee: Associate Professor Carol Skalnik Leff, Chair Sebnem Ozkan, Ph.D ABSTRACT Threats posed to EU’s energy security during the last fifteen years, made the Commission to develop the Energy Policy promoting the integration and the creation of the Internal Energy Market. The “Third Energy Package” was introduced in 2009 aiming to promote the liberalization of the market but not all the member states complied immediately; there were delays and differences among them. The focus of this study is the Directive 2009/73/EC and how Romania and Lithuania reacted and tried to transpose it into national law. By comparing them the study aims to find differences and to reach general conclusions about the Energy Policy and factors that determine the countries’ responses and compliance. The paper analyzes the energy markets and the changes caused by the Directive, energy security concerns, the countries’ general compliance stance, administrative capacity and corruption, national interests and foreign policy, domestic politics with changes of governments and possible pressure from interested groups because of cost-benefit calculations based on the specific Directive’s provisions. The analysis shows that cold relations with Russia do not guarantee a country’s compliance. Energy security issues explain Lithuania’s willingness to comply but Romania’s stance is not in line with the geopolitical role it wants to acquire in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Arbitral Award Basketball Arbitral Tribunal (Bat)
    ARBITRAL AWARD (BAT 0231/11) by the BASKETBALL ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL (BAT) Mr. Stephan Netzle in the arbitration proceedings between Mr. Elias Kantzouris , - Claimant - Represented by Mr. Pantelis Dedes, Dedes-Makroglou and Associates, Xanthou str. 2, 10673 Athens, Greece vs. BC Zalgiris Kaunas, K. Donelaicio Street 60, 44248 Kaunas, Lithuania - Respondent - Represented by Mr. Jonas Stadalninkas, Director 1. The Parties 1.1 The Claimant 1. Mr. Elias Kantzouris (hereinafter the “Assistant Coach”) is a professional basketball coach of Greek nationality. He is represented by Mr. Pantelis Dedes, attorney-at-law in Athens, Greece. 1.2 The Respondent 2. BC Zalgiris Kaunas (hereinafter the “Club”) is a professional basketball club located in Kaunas, Lithuania. The Club is represented by its Director, Mr. Jonas Stadalninkas. 2. The Arbitrator 3. On 28 December 2011, the President of the Basketball Arbitral Tribunal (hereinafter the "BAT"), Prof. Richard H. McLaren, appointed Dr. Stephan Netzle as arbitrator (hereinafter the “Arbitrator”) pursuant to Article 8.1 of the Rules of the Basketball Arbitral Tribunal (hereinafter the "BAT Rules"). None of the Parties has raised any objections to the appointment of the Arbitrator or to his declaration of independence. 3. Facts and Proceedings 3.1 Summary of the Dispute 4. By agreement dated 1 July 2011, the Assistant Coach and the Club entered into an employment agreement (hereinafter the “Coaching Agreement“) for one basketball season. The first sentence of Clause 1 of the Coaching Agreement describes the term of the agreement as follows: Arbitral Award 2/25 (BAT 0231/11) “Employment and Term . Club hereby retains the exclusive services of Assistant Coach and services will commence on the date of signing of this Agreement by both parties (i.e.
    [Show full text]