Raptor Predation on Wintering Shorebirds

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Raptor Predation on Wintering Shorebirds RAPTOR PREDATION ON WINTERING SHOREBIRDS G. PAGE AND D. F. WHITACRE Point Reyes Bird Observatory Box 3,221 Bolinas, California 94924 Although high mortality rates have been dem- and mud flats form the major feeding habitat for onstrated for shorebirds by the analysis of large numbers of shorebirds that winter on the estuary. band recoveries and studies of marked birds (Martin-LGf 1961; Boyd 1962; Holmes 1966; METHODS Soikelli 1970), there is little information on Using a spotting scope and binoculars, we watched the causes of shorebird mortality. Goss-Cus- many diurnal raptors while they hunted on Bolinas Lagoon. When we saw a raptor eat prey, we col- tard (1970) theorized that flocking by some lected the remains and identified the prey to species shorebirds on the wintering grounds is a pro- bv comuarine the remains with study skins. We also I _ tective response against avian predators. How- searched for-piles of feathers and bther remains of ever, there exists no information demonstrat- shorebirds eaten by raptors and identified these in the same manner. We counted the number of pri- ing the extent to which raptors affect wintering maries in each pile of feathers, and if 11 or more pri- shorebird populations. Consequently, it was maries were present, we considered the remains to our purpose in this study to examine in detail represent one bird. If fewer than 11 primaries were the relationship between raptors and shore- present, we considered the remains to represent part birds and determine the impact of the raptors of a bird. To estimate the number of birds repre- sented by the partial remains, the total number of on the size of winter shorebird populations. left wing primaries contained in all the partial remains Although the raptors we studied were mainly was divided by the average number of primaries per the Merlin (F&o columharius) and Short- wing in the remains representing an entire bird. eared Owl (Asia flammeus) and the shore- We studied the composition of the owls ’ diets by analyzing pellets collected regularly at their roosts. birds were mainly the Dunlin (C&&is a@na) We removed all the bones from each pellet and de- and Least Sandpiper ( CaZi&is minutilla), we termined the species to which they belonged by com- have described all the raptor-shorebird inter- parison with known skeletons. In both winters we found many bones from either Robins (Tu&s migra- actions that we saw. The study was conducted torius) or Varied Thrushes (Ixoreus naevius) in the during the winters of 1971-72 and 1972-73 on pellets of Short-eared Owls. Although we could not Bolinas Lagoon, Marin County, California. separate the bones of these two species, there was strong evidence that most were from Varied Thrushes. STUDY AREA The lengths of the humeri, ulnae, and tarsometatarsi from the Dellets were sinnificantlv different (P < Bolinas Lagoon is a 570-ha estuary at the southern 0.05), fro& the lengths of ihe correiponding bon& of edge of Point Reyes Peninsula on the central Cali- Robins, but were nit significantly different (P > 0.05) fornia coast (fig. 1). The entire east side of the es- ( Steel and Torrie 1960:74) in length from the corre- tuary is bordered by Bolinas Ridge, which rises 460 sponding bones of Varied Thrushes. During the two m above sea level. The west side of Bolinas Lagoon winters of study, we found the feathers of 11 Varied is bordered by wooded hills, pastures, and the steep, Thrushes and 2 Robins at the Short-eared Owls ’ roost. 40-m high, wooded face of the Franciscan Mesa. To In this paper, therefore, we have referred to all these the south, a low sand spit separates the estuary from bones as Varied Thrush remains. The presence in a the ocean, except for a narrow opening at the es- pellet of one or more identifiable bones of an animal tuarys’ southwestern corner. On the north, the es- we considered to represent one prey item and bones tuar; is bordered by the lower slopes of the Bolinas from two individuals of the same species in a pellet to Ridge and the wooded floor of the Olema Valley. represent two prey items, even if major skeletal ele- Kent Island lies close to the southwestern edge bf ments were missing. We calculated the proportion of Bolinas Lagoon, separated by a narrow channel from each prey species in the owls ’ diet by converting the the Franciscan Mesa and Pine Gulch Creek delta number of individuals of each species in the pellets to (fig. 1). The majority of the islands’ 40 ha is salt a percentage of the total prey represented in the pel- marsh (Salicornia uirginica, Spartina foliosa, and Dis- lets. tichlis spicata), but a small area on the southwestern During February and March 1973, we kept a Short- corner is a few feet higher than the rest and is cov- eared Owl in captivity to obtain an es&ate of the ered by grass and several Monterey pines (Pinus number of Dellets Droduced dailv bv an owl under mdiata) and Monterey cypresses ( Cupressus maccro- natural co&tions. -T?;heShort-caged Owl‘ was a wild car)?a). A narrow row of sand dunes extends east bird that had been found with a broken wing. The from this high area 460 m along the southern edge of wing had recently mended when we received it. The the island aid provides cover for roosting Short-eared bird was kept in an outdoor cage, where it was rela- Owls. A few hundred hectares of tidal sand and mud tively inactive except when it ran over the cage floor flat border Kent Island, the Pine Gulch Creek delta, or flew between two perches. We fed it dead Cali- the north and south ends of the estuary, and the sand fornia voles ( Microtus califomicus) and deer mice spit on the estuarys’ southern boundary. These sand (Peromyscus maniculatus)‘ and recorded the total [731 The Condor 77:73-83,, 1975 74 G. PAGE AND D. F. WHITACRE adult female Merlin wintered there from early September 1972 to April 1973. After examin- ing many study skins of Merlins, we were con- fident that the bird was an adult female and that it was of the subspecies (F. c. bendirei). Between 21 September 1972 and 28 February 1973, we watched the Merlin on 119 days and saw her eat 131 vertebrate prey items, of which 109 were shorebirds, and collected 12 additional shorebird remains from her eating perches. During her stay, she hunted shore- birds on Bolinas Lagoon almost every day. The falcon usually arrived early in the morning and spent the entire day on the estuary, al- though she sometimes left after an early after- PACIFIC OCEAN noon meal. Her nocturnal roost was not lo- cated but it was at least 0.8 km from the FIGURE 1. Map of Bolinas Lagoon. estuary. On six occasions we saw her chase other Merlins away from the estuary. weight of rodents eaten in each meal. We varied the The Merlin selected hunting perches in re- number of rodents in each feeding, the number of sponse to the distribution of her major prey, feedings per night, and the time intervals between small sandpipers. At low tide, Least Sand- feedings. Weight of the owl was monitored throughout pipers, Western Sandpipers, and Dunlins fed the experiment. To estimate the weight of prey consumed daily on the mud flats and the Merlin hunted them by the raptors on the estuary, we calculated the aver- from perches nearby. When the tide was high age weight of each prey species. These averages were and the small sandpipers came into the salt based on the weights of 12-30 individuals from Point marsh to feed or to roost, she hunted them Reyes Bird Observatory banding records and from study skin data. To estimate the number of shorebirds from perches in the salt marsh. During very available to raptors, we took six censuses per month high tides, Least Sandpipers and Dunlins con- of the shorebirds on Bolinas Lagoon in the winter of gregated in pastures adjacent to the estuary 1971-72, and three censuses per month in 1972-73. and she hunted them from fence posts border- The estuary was divided into three areas and the In mid-November heavy birds in each area were counted or estimated simul- ing the pastures. taneously. On some censuses small sandpipers [Least rains and high tides flooded the estuary and Sandpipers, Dunlins, and Western Sandpipers (Cali- much of the adjoining pastures. Many Dun- dris mu&)] could not be separately identified. These lins and some Least Sandpipers left Bolinas birds always made up less than 20% of those that Lagoon and moved to pastures on Bolinas were identified and were incorporated into the census totals as Least Sandpipers, Dunlins, and Western Sand- Mesa, 1.2 km west of the estuary. The Merlin pipers according to the relative abundance of these followed and hunted the sandpipers there. species on the census. The average number of shore- When an opportunity arose, she often attacked birds from each months’ censuses from October other prey between hunts at shorebirds, and through February was calculated and the highest of these averages was used as an estimate of the winter occasionally, instead of hunting shorebirds, population of each shorebird. To measure the abun- she remained on the margin of the estuary and dance of California voles during the winter, we hunted passerines. She sometimes caught fly- trapped voles in three areas on Kent Island in I972- ing grasshoppers and lepidopterans when they 73, using live traps made after the pattern of Brown were available in the fall and spring.
Recommended publications
  • Field Identification of Smaller Sandpipers Within the Genus <I
    Field identification of smaller sandpipers within the genus C/dr/s Richard R. Veit and Lars Jonsson Paintings and line drawings by Lars Jonsson INTRODUCTION the hand, we recommend that the reader threeNearctic species, the Semipalmated refer to the speciesaccounts of Prateret Sandpiper (C. pusilia), the Western HESMALL Calidris sandpipers, affec- al. (1977) or Cramp and Simmons Sandpiper(C. mauri) andthe LeastSand- tionatelyreferred to as "peeps" in (1983). Our conclusionsin this paperare piper (C. minutilla), and four Palearctic North America, and as "stints" in Britain, basedupon our own extensivefield expe- species,the primarilywestern Little Stint haveprovided notoriously thorny identi- rience,which, betweenus, includesfirst- (C. minuta), the easternRufous-necked ficationproblems for many years. The hand familiarity with all sevenspecies. Stint (C. ruficollis), the eastern Long- first comprehensiveefforts to elucidate We also examined specimensin the toed Stint (C. subminuta)and the wide- thepicture were two paperspublished in AmericanMuseum of Natural History, spread Temminck's Stint (C. tem- Brtttsh Birds (Wallace 1974, 1979) in Museumof ComparativeZoology, Los minckii).Four of thesespecies, pusilla, whichthe problem was approached from Angeles County Museum, San Diego mauri, minuta and ruficollis, breed on the Britishperspective of distinguishing Natural History Museum, Louisiana arctictundra and are found during migra- vagrant Nearctic or eastern Palearctic State UniversityMuseum of Zoology, tion in flocksof up to thousandsof
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List
    Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List The target species list (species to be surveyed) should not change over the course of the study, therefore determining the target species list is an important project design task. Because waterbirds, including shorebirds, can occur in very high numbers in a census area, it is often not possible to count all species without compromising the quality of the survey data. For the basic shorebird census program (protocol 1), we recommend counting all shorebirds (sub-Order Charadrii), all raptors (hawks, falcons, owls, etc.), Common Ravens, and American Crows. This list of species is available on our field data forms, which can be downloaded from this site, and as a drop-down list on our online data entry form. If a very rare species occurs on a shorebird area survey, the species will need to be submitted with good documentation as a narrative note with the survey data. Project goals that could preclude counting all species include surveys designed to search for color-marked birds or post- breeding season counts of age-classed bird to obtain age ratios for a species. When conducting a census, you should identify as many of the shorebirds as possible to species; sometimes, however, this is not possible. For example, dowitchers often cannot be separated under censuses conditions, and at a distance or under poor lighting, it may not be possible to distinguish some species such as small Calidris sandpipers. We have provided codes for species combinations that commonly are reported on censuses. Combined codes are still species-specific and you should use the code that provides as much information as possible about the potential species combination you designate.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Checklist (PDF)
    Surf Scoter Marbled Godwit OWLS (Strigidae) Common Raven White-winged Scoter Ruddy Turnstone Eastern Screech Owl CHICKADEES (Paridae) Common Goldeneye Red Knot Great Horned Owl Black-capped Chickadee Barrow’s Goldeneye Sanderling Snowy Owl Boreal Chickadee Bufflehead Semipalmated Sandpiper Northern Hawk-Owl Tufted Titmouse Hooded Merganser Western Sandpiper Barred Owl NUTHATCHES (Sittidae) Common Merganser Least Sandpiper Great Gray Owl Red-breasted Nuthatch Red-breasted Merganser White-rumped Sandpiper Long-eared Owl White-breasted Nuthatch Ruddy Duck Baird’s Sandpiper Short-eared Owl CREEPERS (Certhiidae) VULTURES (Cathartidae) Pectoral Sandpiper Northern Saw-Whet Owl Brown Creeper Turkey Vulture Purple Sandpiper NIGHTJARS (Caprimulgidae) WRENS (Troglodytidae) HAWKS & EAGLES (Accipitridae) Dunlin Common Nighthawk Carolina Wren Osprey Stilt Sandpiper Whip-poor-will House Wren Bald Eagle Buff-breasted Sandpiper SWIFTS (Apodidae) Winter Wren Northern Harrier Ruff Chimney Swift Marsh Wren Sharp-shinned Hawk Short-billed Dowitcher HUMMINGBIRDS (Trochilidae) THRUSHES (Muscicapidae) Cooper’s Hawk Wilson’s Snipe Ruby-throated Hummingbird Golden-crowned Kinglet Northern Goshawk American Woodcock KINGFISHERS (Alcedinidae) Ruby-crowned Kinglet Red-shouldered Hawk Wilson’s Phalarope Belted Kingfisher Blue-gray Gnatcatcher Broad-winged Hawk Red-necked Phalarope WOODPECKERS (Picidae) Eastern Bluebird Red-tailed Hawk Red Phalarope Red-headed Woodpecker Veery Rough-legged Hawk GULLS & TERNS (Laridae) Yellow-bellied Sapsucker Gray-cheeked Thrush Golden
    [Show full text]
  • Least Sandpiper (Calidris Minutilla) Breeding in Massachusetts
    Least Sandpiper Calidris minutilla breeding in Massachusetts A breedingrange extension southwestward of 480 kilometers; thefirst known UnitedStates breeding record Kathleen S. Anderson HELEAST SANDPIPER (Calidris minu- firreed as a Calidris minutilla chick ap- Clement (1961) reported a brood of tilla) breedsfrom subarcticAlaska proximately 3 days old (Jehl, pers. Least Sandpiper chicks as early as June to Newfoundland, with Cape Sable Is- comm.). The specimenhas been donated 11 at Cape Sable Island. Miller (1977) •n- land and Sable Island, Nova Scotia the to the Museum of Comparative Zoology dicated that clutchesare completed from southernmost limits of the reported at Harvard University. May 23 to June 24 which, given 14-17 breedingrange (Godfrey 1966:155).Re- Monomoy Island is a typical Atlantic days for incubation (Jehl, 1970) would cent seasonal reports from American barrier beach of sand dunes and marsh mean young hatch between June 6 and Btrds(Finch 1971, 1975),indicate an in- extending in a north-south direction July 11 at that location. creasein breeding recordsfrom coastal from the elbow of Cape Cod at I thank Richard A. Harlow and Tabor Halifax County, Nova Scotia, but this Chatham. Once a peninsula,Monomoy Academy for providing transportanon may representintensified search rather recently (c. 1959) became an island to Monomoy Island, Brian A. Harr- than a population change (McLaren, about 16km long. On February 8, 1978, ington for his editorial help, and pers.comm.). Reportsfrom New Bruns- a severestorm causeda cut through the William H. Drury, Jr., for suggesting•n- wick do not suggest breeding there middle of the island dividing it into two stantly the probable identification from (Christie, pers.
    [Show full text]
  • British Birds |
    VOL. LU JULY No. 7 1959 BRITISH BIRDS WADER MIGRATION IN NORTH AMERICA AND ITS RELATION TO TRANSATLANTIC CROSSINGS By I. C. T. NISBET IT IS NOW generally accepted that the American waders which occur each autumn in western Europe have crossed the Atlantic unaided, in many (if not most) cases without stopping on the way. Yet we are far from being able to answer all the questions which are posed by these remarkable long-distance flights. Why, for example, do some species cross the Atlantic much more frequently than others? Why are a few birds recorded each year, and not many more, or many less? What factors determine the dates on which they cross? Why are most of the occurrences in the autumn? Why, despite the great advantage given to them by the prevail­ ing winds, are American waders only a little more numerous in Europe than European waders in North America? To dismiss the birds as "accidental vagrants", or to relate their occurrence to weather patterns, as have been attempted in the past, may answer some of these questions, but render the others still more acute. One fruitful approach to these problems is to compare the frequency of the various species in Europe with their abundance, migratory behaviour and ecology in North America. If the likelihood of occurrence in Europe should prove to be correlated with some particular type of migration pattern in North America this would offer an important clue as to the causes of trans­ atlantic vagrancy. In this paper some aspects of wader migration in North America will be discussed from this viewpoint.
    [Show full text]
  • SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does Not Include Alcidae
    SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does not include Alcidae CREATED BY AZA CHARADRIIFORMES TAXON ADVISORY GROUP IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Charadriiformes Taxon Advisory Group. (2014). Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Original Completion Date: October 2013 Authors and Significant Contributors: Aimee Greenebaum: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Vice Chair, Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Alex Waier: Milwaukee County Zoo, USA Carol Hendrickson: Birmingham Zoo, USA Cindy Pinger: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Chair, Birmingham Zoo, USA CJ McCarty: Oregon Coast Aquarium, USA Heidi Cline: Alaska SeaLife Center, USA Jamie Ries: Central Park Zoo, USA Joe Barkowski: Sedgwick County Zoo, USA Kim Wanders: Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Mary Carlson: Charadriiformes Program Advisor, Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Perry: Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Crook-Martin: Buttonwood Park Zoo, USA Shana R. Lavin, Ph.D.,Wildlife Nutrition Fellow University of Florida, Dept. of Animal Sciences , Walt Disney World Animal Programs Dr. Stephanie McCain: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Veterinarian Advisor, DVM, Birmingham Zoo, USA Phil King: Assiniboine Park Zoo, Canada Reviewers: Dr. Mike Murray (Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA) John C. Anderson (Seattle Aquarium volunteer) Kristina Neuman (Point Blue Conservation Science) Sarah Saunders (Conservation Biology Graduate Program,University of Minnesota) AZA Staff Editors: Maya Seaman, MS, Animal Care Manual Editing Consultant Candice Dorsey, PhD, Director of Animal Programs Debborah Luke, PhD, Vice President, Conservation & Science Cover Photo Credits: Jeff Pribble Disclaimer: This manual presents a compilation of knowledge provided by recognized animal experts based on the current science, practice, and technology of animal management.
    [Show full text]
  • Shorebird Identification 5 SHOREBIRD IDENTIFICATION Usually Over 20 Mm Except in Least, Semipalmated and Buff­ Breasted
    4 EBBA News February 1973 Shorebird Identification 5 SHOREBIRD IDENTIFICATION usually over 20 mm except in Least, Semipalmated and Buff­ breasted. Neck medium to long. 4 toes (except 3 in Sanderling) • BY CHANDLER S, ROBBINS* Back speckrea-or streaked in small species (indistinct markings on Spotted Sandpiper, and on Sanderling in winter). The superfamily of shorebirds is a heterogeneous group. Family Recurvirost ridae : Avocets, Stilts (7 species, 2 in Althou?h most members of this group are zeadily recognized as North Amer ica). Bi ll long, very slender; fegs very long and shoreb1rds, there are few distinctive characters that are pos­ slender, tarsus over 80 mm. 3 toes (stilt or 4 (avocet). sessed ~y all ~pecies. For example, nearly all shorebirds have long po1nted.w1ngs, but the woodcocks and lapwing have decided­ Family Phal aropodidae: Phalaropes (3 species, 3 in North ly rounded w1ngs. Most shorebirds have slender, soft bills, America). 4 toes , the front ones lobed, semipalmate. Female but the oystercatchers have heavy bills that are greatly com­ brighter colored than male. pres~ed l~ter~lly. The phalarope family has lobed toes, each spec1es w1th 1ts own particular type of lobe. The turnstones and most plovers have 3 toes, and most sandpipers have 4 toes Identifying Shorebirds to Species but one genus in each family does not conform to the general ' rule. The purpose of this paper is to assist banders in identi­ fying, to species, shorebirds that are in the hand. These pages The oystercatchers, avocets and stilts are so distinctive are not a substitute for a field guide or for manuals such as in all plumages that they will not be discussed in detail; Roberts, Forbush, Ridgway, or Coues.
    [Show full text]
  • 54971 GPNC Shorebirds
    A P ocket Guide to Great Plains Shorebirds Third Edition I I I By Suzanne Fellows & Bob Gress Funded by Westar Energy Green Team, The Nature Conservancy, and the Chickadee Checkoff Published by the Friends of the Great Plains Nature Center Table of Contents • Introduction • 2 • Identification Tips • 4 Plovers I Black-bellied Plover • 6 I American Golden-Plover • 8 I Snowy Plover • 10 I Semipalmated Plover • 12 I Piping Plover • 14 ©Bob Gress I Killdeer • 16 I Mountain Plover • 18 Stilts & Avocets I Black-necked Stilt • 19 I American Avocet • 20 Hudsonian Godwit Sandpipers I Spotted Sandpiper • 22 ©Bob Gress I Solitary Sandpiper • 24 I Greater Yellowlegs • 26 I Willet • 28 I Lesser Yellowlegs • 30 I Upland Sandpiper • 32 Black-necked Stilt I Whimbrel • 33 Cover Photo: I Long-billed Curlew • 34 Wilson‘s Phalarope I Hudsonian Godwit • 36 ©Bob Gress I Marbled Godwit • 38 I Ruddy Turnstone • 40 I Red Knot • 42 I Sanderling • 44 I Semipalmated Sandpiper • 46 I Western Sandpiper • 47 I Least Sandpiper • 48 I White-rumped Sandpiper • 49 I Baird’s Sandpiper • 50 ©Bob Gress I Pectoral Sandpiper • 51 I Dunlin • 52 I Stilt Sandpiper • 54 I Buff-breasted Sandpiper • 56 I Short-billed Dowitcher • 57 Western Sandpiper I Long-billed Dowitcher • 58 I Wilson’s Snipe • 60 I American Woodcock • 61 I Wilson’s Phalarope • 62 I Red-necked Phalarope • 64 I Red Phalarope • 65 • Rare Great Plains Shorebirds • 66 • Acknowledgements • 67 • Pocket Guides • 68 Supercilium Median crown Stripe eye Ring Nape Lores upper Mandible Postocular Stripe ear coverts Hind Neck Lower Mandible ©Dan Kilby 1 Introduction Shorebirds, such as plovers and sandpipers, are a captivating group of birds primarily adapted to live in open areas such as shorelines, wetlands and grasslands.
    [Show full text]
  • Shorebird Habitat Conservation Strategy
    Upper Mississippi River and Great Lakes Region Joint Venture Shorebird Habitat Conservation Strategy May 2007 1 Shorebird Strategy Committee and Members of the Joint Venture Science Team Bob Gates, Ohio State University, Chair Dave Ewert, The Nature Conservancy Diane Granfors, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bob Russell, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bradly Potter, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mark Shieldcastle, Ohio Department of Natural Resources Greg Soulliere, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Cover: Long-billed Dowitcher. Photo by Gary Kramer. i Table of Contents Plan Summary................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgements...................................................................................................... 2 Background and Context ................................................................................................. 3 Population Status and Trends ......................................................................................... 6 Habitat Characteristics .................................................................................................. 11 Biological Foundation..................................................................................................... 14 Planning Framework.................................................................................................. 14 Migration and Distribution........................................................................................ 15 Limiting
    [Show full text]
  • Common Shorebirds
    Photo: Davor Desancic Davor Photo: Happy birding! Happy viewing shorebirds. viewing Bay shoreline parks provide such resources along along resources such provide parks shoreline Bay human world with which we share this planet. planet. this share we which with world human opportunities for for opportunities where abundant food resources exist. Our East East Our exist. resources food abundant where thus essential to shorebird survival. shorebird to essential thus conservation and a desire to protect the non- the protect to desire a and conservation visitors with outstanding outstanding with visitors to travel in vast flocks and stop at feeding areas areas feeding at stop and flocks vast in travel to sites is essential to successful migration, and and migration, successful to essential is sites the natural world, and with it a dedication to to dedication a it with and world, natural the avocet habitats and provide provide and habitats which requires food. Migrating shorebirds tend tend shorebirds Migrating food. requires which Flyway. Protection of these important stopover stopover important these of Protection Flyway. find that you develop a sense of connection to to connection of sense a develop you that find American American California’s coastal coastal California’s Migratory flight requires large amounts of energy, energy, of amounts large requires flight Migratory the migratory route known as the Pacific Pacific the as known route migratory the that visit our East Bay shores each year. You may may You year. each shores Bay East our visit that crucial sections of of sections crucial Spend time getting to know the varied shorebirds shorebirds varied the know to getting time Spend Rest Stops Rest parks that both protect protect both that parks the use of a spotting scope and tripod.
    [Show full text]
  • Version 8.0.5 - 12/19/2018 • 1112 Species • the ABA Checklist Is a Copyrighted Work Owned by American Birding Association, Inc
    Version 8.0.5 - 12/19/2018 • 1112 species • The ABA Checklist is a copyrighted work owned by American Birding Association, Inc. and cannot be reproduced without the express written permission of American Birding Association, Inc. • 93 Clinton St. Ste. ABA, PO BOX 744 Delaware City, DE 19706, USA • (800) 850-2473 / (719) 578-9703 • www.aba.org The comprehensive ABA Checklist, including detailed species accounts, and the pocket-sized ABA Trip List can be purchased from ABA Sales at http:// www.buteobooks.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Ohio Shores
    Birds of Ohio Shores: Diversity, Ecology and Management of Shorebirds in Ohio Woodlands Stewards Friday Morning Webinar, October 2, 2020 From Plovers to Pipers (who dey): A diversity tour of Ohio Shorebirds 2 Large Plovers: 3 Common Plovers: 4 Uncommon Plovers: 5 Avocet and Black-Necked Stilt 6 Greater and Lesser Yellowlegs 7 Solitary and Spotted Sandpipers 8 Willet and Upland Sandpiper 9 Whimbrel 10 Hudsonian and Marbled Godwits 11 Ruddy Turnstone and Sanderling 12 “Peeps” (= Calidris spp.) Hard to identify; they all look alike and often occur in large flocks. 13 Dublin and Pectoral Sandpiper 14 White-rumped and Baird’s Sandpipers 15 Semi-palmated and Least Sandpipers 16 Stilt and Buff-breasted Sandpipers 17 End of the “peeps” 18 Long and Short-billed Dowitcher 19 American Woodcock and Wilson’s Snipe 20 Wilson’s and Red-necked Phalaropes 21 And if that were not enough! 22 Breeding, juvenile, fall and spring plumages! 23 Prebalternate and prebasic molts (all spp. of shorebirds, not limited to peeps) Feathers wear so plumage changes spring to fall. 24 Shorebird Guilds Body Size Leg Length Bill size and shape Foraging behavior Habitat type (wetland zone) 25 Shorebird Guilds Small gleaners (beach, dry mudflat) Small probers (moist mudflat) Large probers (moist mudflat, shallow water) Large gleaners (shallow water) 26 Shorebird Habitats Meadow/Marsh Deep (er) Water Shallow Water Wet Mudflat Dry Mudflat 27 28 Shorebird Habitats Dry mudflat species: Killdeer Baird’s Sandpiper Buff-breasted Sandpiper Black-bellied Plover Golden Plover 29
    [Show full text]