DOCSLIB.ORG

Open Space & Recreation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Open Space & Recreation Plan Table of Contents Section 1: Plan Summary .............................................................................................................................. 1 Section 2: Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 A. Statement of Purpose ....................................................................................................................... 1 B. Planning Process and Public Participation ........................................................................................ 2 Map: Regional Context.......................................................................................................................... 4 Section 3: Community Setting....................................................................................................................... 5 A. Regional Context ............................................................................................................................... 5 B. History of the Community ................................................................................................................. 6 C. Population Characteristics ................................................................................................................ 8 Map: Environmental Justice Map ....................................................................................................... 13 D. Growth and Development Patterns ................................................................................................ 14 Map: Zoning Map ................................................................................................................................ 19 Section 4: Environmental Inventory Analysis ............................................................................................. 20 A. Geology, Soils, and Topography ...................................................................................................... 20 Map: Soils and Geologic Features Map 1 ............................................................................................ 21 Map: Soils and Geologic Features Map 2 ............................................................................................ 22 B. Landscape Character ....................................................................................................................... 26 Map: Unique & Scenic Features Map ................................................................................................. 27 C. Water Resources ............................................................................................................................. 28 Map: Water Resources Map ............................................................................................................... 31 Map: FEMA Flood Zones Map ............................................................................................................. 32 Map: Forests and Wetland Areas Map ............................................................................................... 33 D. Vegetation ....................................................................................................................................... 34 E. Fisheries and Wildlife ...................................................................................................................... 35 Map: Estimated and Priority Habitats for Rare Species ...................................................................... 39 Map: Core Habitat & Supporting Natural Landscapes ........................................................................ 40 F. Scenic Resources and Unique Environments .................................................................................. 41 G. Environmental Challenges .............................................................................................................. 43 Section 5: Inventory of Land of Conservation and Recreation Interest...................................................... 48 A. Protected Lands .................................................................................................................................. 48 Map: Protected Parcels Map .............................................................................................................. 52 B. Unprotected Lands ............................................................................................................................. 53 Map: Unprotected Parcels Map .......................................................................................................... 63 Section 6: Community Vision ...................................................................................................................... 65 A. Description of Process .................................................................................................................... 65 B. Statement of Open Space and Recreation Goals ............................................................................ 65 Section 7: Analysis of Needs ....................................................................................................................... 66 A. Summary of Resource Protection Needs ........................................................................................ 66 B. Summary of Community’s Needs ................................................................................................... 67 C. Management Needs, Potential Change of Use ............................................................................... 69 Section 8: Goals and Objectives .................................................................................................................. 70 Section 9: Seven-Year Action and Policy Plan ............................................................................................. 71 Section 10: Public Comments ..................................................................................................................... 78 A. Resident Comments Regarding Open Space & Recreational Matters ............................................ 78 Section 11: References................................................................................................................................ 79 Section 12: ADA Compliance and Transition Plan ADA ............................................................................... 80 Attachment A: ADA Information and Procedures ...................................................................................... 88 Attachment B: Open Space & Recreation Survey ....................................................................................... 90 Attachment C: Letters of Support ............................................................................................................... 96 Section 1: Plan Summary In review of the 2008 Open Space and Recreation Plan (OSRP) goals and objectives and the City of New Bedford’s recreational and open space inventories, the Open Space and Recreational Committee has determined that many of the critical needs of our citizens would be better met if more efficient planning, management and maintenance of the city’s parks and playgrounds existed. This was evident throughout the public process where citizens at each neighborhood group meeting noted that the city needed better maintenance and budget plans for each park, playground and preservation area. The citizens and the Committee feel that New Bedford has plenty of active and passive recreational opportunities to be enjoyed by everyone, from toddlers to seniors; we simply need to be better harness our assets to ensure that they are utilized to their fullest potential. Previously, the one outstanding recreational item that the community felt was missing was a greenway/bicycle trail along the Acushnet River and Clark’s Cove, linking New Bedford to Fairhaven and Dartmouth. Over the past five years, the City has strived to acquire the necessary land easements and other permits to construct a multi-use trail. This continues to be an on-going initiative as we pursue the Riverwalk along the Acushnet River; bicycle lanes/paths on streets chosen in cooperation with the recently formed New Bedford Bike Committee; and the Harborwalk—a multiuse path on top of the hurricane barrier—which construction will begin on this spring through funding provided through the Parkland Acquisition and Renovations for Communities (PARC) grant program offered through the state. The City of New Bedford is committed to fulfilling the goals of the revised 2014 OSRP. The City is invested in the creation and/or update of management plans for the five citywide parks, the Sassaquin Pond area and the Acushnet Cedar Swamp, the establishment of maintenance plans for playgrounds and sport fields, and the creation of yearly budgets for the maintenance of our parks and playgrounds. Prepared by the City of New Bedford Department of Planning, Housing & Community Development 1 Section 2: Introduction A. Statement of Purpose The purpose of the update and revision of the Open Space & Recreation Plan is to take an extensive inventory of what exists in New Bedford today, determine which goals and objectives were met and which need improvement or amending. The OSRP has the potential to be an efficient tool that the City can wield when doing short-range planning, such as permitting subdivisions and mill overlay districts or long-range planning, in the forms of a city master
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Acushnet River Restoration Project: Restoring Diadromous Populations to a Superfund Site in Southeastern Massachusetts
    Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-56 The Acushnet River Restoration Project: Restoring Diadromous Populations to a Superfund Site in Southeastern Massachusetts J.J. Sheppard1, S. Block2, H.L Becker3, and D. Quinn4 1Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries South Shore Field Station 1213 Purchase Street, 3rd Floor New Bedford, MA 02740 2National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Restoration Center 55 Great Republic Drive Gloucester, MA 01930 3EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc 221 Sun Valley Boulevard, Suite D Lincoln, NE 68528 4DQ Engineering 11 Hickory Lane Walpole, MA 02081 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Department of Fish and Game Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report Technical March 2014 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report Series Managing Editor: Michael P. Armstrong Technical and Copy Editor: Elaine Brewer The Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Reports present information and data pertinent to the management, biology and commercial and recreational fisheries of anadromous, estuarine, and marine organisms of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and adjacent waters. The series presents information in a timely fashion that is of limited scope or is useful to a smaller, specific audience and therefore may not be appropriate for national or international journals. Included in this series are data summaries, reports of monitoring programs, and results of studies that are directed at specific management problems. All Reports in the series are available for download in PDF format at: http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/dmf/publications/technical.html or hard copies may be obtained from the Annisquam River Marine Fisheries Station, 30 Emerson Ave., Gloucester, MA 01930 USA (978-282-0308).
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)
    VOLUME 2 OF 4 BRISTOL COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Bristol County COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ACUSHNET, TOWN OF 250048 ATTLEBORO, CITY OF 250049 BERKLEY, TOWN OF 250050 DARTMOUTH, TOWN OF 250051 DIGHTON, TOWN OF 250052 EASTON, TOWN OF 250053 FAIRHAVEN, TOWN OF 250054 FALL RIVER, CITY OF 250055 FREETOWN, TOWN OF 250056 MANSFIELD, TOWN OF 250057 NEW BEDFORD, CITY OF 255216 NORTH ATTLEBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250059 NORTON, TOWN OF 250060 RAYNHAM, TOWN OF 250061 REHOBOTH, TOWN OF 250062 SEEKONK, TOWN OF 250063 SOMERSET, TOWN OF 255220 SWANSEA, TOWN OF 255221 TAUTON, CITY OF 250066 WESTPORT, TOWN OF 255224 REVISED JULY 16, 2014 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25005CV002B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for the community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone New Zone A1 through A30 AE V1 through V30 VE (shaded) B X C X Part or all of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the Flood Insurance Study.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Estuaries Project
    Massachusetts Estuaries Project Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for the Slocum’s and Little River Estuaries, Dartmouth, MA University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Massachusetts Department of School of Marine Science and Technology Environmental Protection FINAL REPORT – December 2008 Massachusetts Estuaries Project Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for the Slocum’s and Little River Estuaries, Dartmouth, MA FINAL REPORT – December 2008 Brian Howes Tony Millham Roland Samimy David Schlezinger John Ramsey Trey Ruthven Ed Eichner Contributors: US Geological Survey Don Walters and John Masterson Applied Coastal Research and Engineering, Inc. Elizabeth Hunt and Sean W. Kelley Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Charles Costello and Brian Dudley SMAST Coastal Systems Program Jennifer Benson, Michael Bartlett, Sara Sampieri, and Elizabeth White Lloyd Center for the Environment Mark Mello Cape Cod Commission Xiaotong Wu © [2007] University of Massachusetts All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Massachusetts Estuaries Project Technical Team would like to acknowledge the contributions of the many individuals who have worked tirelessly for the restoration and protection of the critical coastal resources of the Slocum's and Little River Estuaries and supported the application of the Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for these systems. Without these stewards and their efforts, this project would not have been possible. First and foremost we would like to recognize and applaud the significant time and effort in data collection and discussion spent by members of the Coalition for Buzzards Bay's BayWatcher, Water Quality Monitoring Program. These individuals gave of their time to consistent and sound nutrient related water quality from this system for over a decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Estuaries Project
    Massachusetts Estuaries Project Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for the New Bedford Inner Harbor Embayment System, New Bedford, MA University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Massachusetts Department of School of Marine Science and Technology Environmental Protection UPDATED FINAL REPORT – November 2015 Massachusetts Estuaries Project Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for the New Bedford Inner Harbor Embayment System, New Bedford, MA UPDATED FINAL REPORT – NOVEMBER 2015 Brian Howes Roland Samimy David Schlezinger Ed Eichner John Ramsey Trey Ruthven Contributors: US Geological Survey Don Walters and John Masterson Applied Coastal Research and Engineering, Inc. Elizabeth Hunt and Sean W. Kelley Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Charles Costello and Brian Dudley (DEP project manager) SMAST Coastal Systems Program Jennifer Benson, Michael Bartlett, Sara Sampieri and Elizabeth White M A E, Inc. Maisy McDarby-Stanovich Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Massachusetts Estuaries Project Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for the New Bedford Inner Harbor Embayment System New Bedford, Massachusetts Executive Summary 1. Project Overview This updated report (revised to Final based on two rounds of comments from the MassDEP {Dec. 2013 and Aug. 2014} and comments from the Town of Fairhaven consultant {Feb. 2014}) builds on the Massachusetts Estuaries Project’s Linked Watershed-Embayment Approach which was applied to the Acushnet River – New Bedford Inner Harbor embayment system and first completed in December 2008. This updated report presents the results generated from the implementation of the Massachusetts Estuaries Project’s Linked Watershed- Embayment Approach to the Acushnet River – New Bedford Inner Harbor embayment system, a coastal embayment within the City of New Bedford and the Town of Fairhaven, Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Estuaries Project
    Massachusetts Estuaries Project Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for the Apponagansett Bay Estuary, Dartmouth, MA University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Massachusetts Department of School of Marine Science and Technology Environmental Protection DRAFT REPORT – JUNE 2015 Massachusetts Estuaries Project Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for the Apponagansett Bay Estuary, Dartmouth, MA DRAFT REPORT – JUNE 2015 Brian Howes Tony Millham Ed Eichner Roland Samimy David Schlezinger John Ramsey Trey Ruthven Contributors: US Geological Survey Don Walters and John Masterson Applied Coastal Research and Engineering, Inc. Elizabeth Hunt and Sean Kelley Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Charles Costello and Brian Dudley SMAST Coastal Systems Program Jennifer Benson, Michael Bartlett, Sara Sampieri, and Elizabeth White Lloyd Center for the Environment Mark Mello MAE, Inc. Maisy McDarby Stanovich ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Massachusetts Estuaries Project Technical Team would like to acknowledge the contributions of the many individuals who have worked tirelessly for the restoration and protection of the critical coastal resources of the Slocum's and Little River Estuaries and supported the application of the Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for these systems. Without these stewards and their efforts, this project would not have been possible. First and foremost we would like to recognize and applaud the significant time and effort in data collection and discussion spent by members of the Coalition for Buzzards Bay's BayWatcher, Water Quality Monitoring Program. These individuals gave of their time to consistent and sound nutrient related water quality from this system for over a decade. These data were enhanced by short-term intensive water quality monitoring efforts by the Lloyd Center Staff and interns participating in the Turn the Tide Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Autumns Colors Are Appearing, and the Red Colors Will Soon Arrive from Our Mix of Deciduous Trees Including This Month's Featu
    Community Collaborative Rain, Hail & Snow Network October 2020 2017017 2016 Autumns colors are appearing, and the red colors will soon arrive from our mix of deciduous trees including this month’s feature, the State Tree of Massachusetts, the American Elm. September can be remembered as the month without precipitation and a two week stretch without any precipitation. As we say “Be a hero. Report your zeros.” Your efforts in September were truly heroic, submitting over 9000 reports of zero precip, a single month record as well as an extremely high ratio of zeros to non-zeros. As the daylight wanes, we start thinking about snow. Joe’s feature article is about a new feature that the National Weather Service has put into production, a Winter Storm Severity Index. Not all winter weather events unfold equally, so read on to see what it is all about. A record long list of stations that had complete reports, a list that stretches to 9 pages. Another record long list of the Rulers of the Snow. And a little something extra showing counts of zero precip days in Septembers past. We start it all off with our version of “The Grand List” Let’s get into it. Southern New England CoCoRaHS Page 1 October 2020 Newsletter The “Grand” List Congratulations to all of these observers from our three states who have recently passed a milestone of 1000 Daily Reports. 4000 Daily Reports RI-WS-1 Hope Valley 3.7 S MA-ES-8 Marblehead 0.8 SW 3000 Daily Reports MA-DK-5 West Tisbury 2.9 N 2000 Daily Reports MA-MD-47 West Townsend 0.5 W MA-HS-7 Plainfield 2.2 SW MA-HD-13 Springfield 4.1 W 1000 Daily Reports CT-HR-52 Central Manchester 0.8 N RI-KN-15 Warwick 4.3 SSW RI-KN-17 East Greenwich 1.2 NNE Southern New England CoCoRaHS Page 2 October 2020 Newsletter WSSI: Winter Sorm Severity Index Joe DelliCarpini – Science & Operations Officer, NWS Boston/Norton MA The Winter Storm Severity Index, or WSSI, is being produced by National Weather Service offices across the country and is intended to be used as a tool to help communicate a general level of expected impacts due to winter weather.
    [Show full text]
  • Streamflow, Ground-Water Recharge and Discharge, and Characteristics of Surficial Deposits in Buzzards Bay Basin, Southeastern Massachusetts U.S
    Streamflow, Ground-Water Recharge and Discharge, and Characteristics of Surficial Deposits in Buzzards Bay Basin, Southeastern Massachusetts U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4234 Prepared in cooperation with MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, DIVISION OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION, OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES Streamflow, Ground-Water Recharge and Discharge, and Characteristics of Surficial Deposits in Buzzards Bay Basin, Southeastern Massachusetts By GARDNER C. BENT U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4234 Prepared in cooperation with MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, DIVISION OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION, OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES Marlborough, Massachusetts 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: Chief, Massachusetts-Rhode Island District U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center Water Resources Division Open-File Reports Section 28 Lord Road, Suite 280 Box 25286, MS 517 Marlborough, MA 01752 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 700 KB Adobe PDF Format
    TURN THE TIDE spring 2005 A PARTNERSHIP TO RESTORE THE HEALTH OF DARTMOUTH’S COASTAL ESTUARIES AND RIVERS SLOCUMS/PASKAMANSETT RIVER, LITTLE RIVER AND APPONAGANSETT BAY WATERSHEDS We hope that through this newsletter, parents and all watershed residents will gain a better appreciation of how Lloyd Center education professionals are using local history, environmental conditions, and current Turn the Tide research to transfer fundamental, scientific skills and princi- ples to Dartmouth 5th graders in ways that are both relevant to their everyday world and also enjoyable. We also hope that the photographs in this newsletter are able to convey some of the excitement and sense of discovery that the students show when they go out in the marsh looking for fiddler crabs, put on waders to go along the estuary shore to net small fish, or screen some estuary mud to find and identify the worms and shellfish that reside there. MET GRANTS BIG FISH VISIT THE 5TH GRADE This newsletter was funded by a generous This Spring Executive Office of Environmental grant from the Massachusetts Environmental Affairs Secretary Ellen Roy Herzfelder and State Trust to Turn the Tide. The MET Environmental Representative John Quinn visited the James TURN THE TIDE PARTNERS Education Grant has two goals: to develop M. Quinn Elementary school to participate in and pilot the Turn the Tide curriculum in the the Turn the Tide classroom sessions as a cele- Dartmouth Public schools and to publish and bration of National Environmental Education distribute to all watershed residents information Week. Secretary Herzfelder and Representative TOWN OF DARTMOUTH focusing on 5th graders’ experiences in both Quinn worked with students on water chem- www.town.dartmouth.ma.us the classroom and in field studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Flow Inventory
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by State Library of Massachusetts Electronic Repository Low Flow Inventory Summary In 2002, recognizing the need for deeper examination of streamflow alteration and depletion in Massachusetts, Riverways program staff embarked upon what was called the “Low Flow Inventory”. Staff made contact with people around the state regarding observed and/or measured flow alterations in streams large and small. The resulting Low Flow Inventory brought together existing information into one place to enable individuals, communities, and state agencies to access information and observations about streams with unnatural flow problems and to summarize the extent of streamflow alteration and depletion on a statewide basis. Riverways’ goal was to publicize and educate the public about the extent of the flow alteration and to empower local communities to prevent and restore more natural streamflow patterns and volumes in their rivers. For many years this information was accessible as a series of linked pages on our website. Over the years, it was less frequently updated, as our staff were focused on stream gaging through our resulting River Instream Flow Stewards (RIFLS) program. Through RIFLS, we work with local organizations to monitor and address specific cases of flow alteration. With our partners and volunteer gage readers, we have been able to more fully document flow stress in some of the streams identified in the Low Flow Inventory (see www.rifls.org). In recognition that many of the Low Flow Inventory pages were becoming out of date, RIFLS staff moved all of the information from those pages into this single document, accessible on our website.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Anadromous Fish Passage in Coastal Massachusetts
    Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-15 A Survey of Anadromous Fish Passage in Coastal Massachusetts Part 1. Southeastern Massachusetts K. E. Reback, P. D. Brady, K. D. McLaughlin, and C. G. Milliken Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Department of Fisheries and Game Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Commonwealth of Massachusetts Technical Report Technical May 2004 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-15 A Survey of Anadromous Fish Passage in Coastal Massachusetts Part 1. Southeastern Massachusetts Kenneth E. Reback, Phillips D. Brady, Katherine D. McLauglin, and Cheryl G. Milliken Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Southshore Field Station 50A Portside Drive Pocasset, MA January 2004 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Paul Diodati, Director Department of Fisheries and Game Dave Peters, Commissioner Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Ellen Roy-Herztfelder, Secretary Commonwealth of Massachusetts Mitt Romney, Governor TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 1: Southeastern Massachusetts Acknowledgements . iii Abstract. iv Introduction . 1 Materials and Methods . 1 Life Histories . 2 Management . 4 Narragansett Bay Drainage . 6 Map of towns and streams . 6 Stream Survey . 7 Narragansett Bay Recommendations . 25 Taunton River Watershed . 26 Map of towns and streams . 26 Stream Survey . 27 Taunton River Recommendations . 76 Buzzards Bay Drainage . 77 Map of towns and streams . 77 Stream Survey . 78 Buzzards Bay Recommendations . 118 General Recommendations . 119 Alphabetical
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of the Buzzards Bay Watershed
    Water Resources of The Buzzards Bay Watershed Water Use, Hydrology, and Natural Resources September 1995 Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs .Department of Environmental Management Office of Water Resources WUliam F. Weld, Governor - Argeo Paul Cellucci, Ll. Governor - Trudy Coxe, Secretary - Peter C. Webber, Commissioner EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Buzzards Bay basin, located in southeastern Massachusettst includes the northwest shore of Buzzards Bay (the coastal drainage) and eight subbasins drained by different rivers which flow into the Buzzards Bay shore estuaries. These subbasins are: East Branch Westport Rivert Paskamanset Rivert Acushnet Rivert Mattapoisett Rivert Sippican Rivert Weweantic Rivert Wankinco Rivert and Agawam River. There are fourteen communities Westpo~ with land area or water supplies in the basin. These are: Dartmoutht Fall Rivert Acushne~ Freeto~ Fairhave~ Mattapoiset~ New Bedfordt Rochestert Marion, Carvert Wareh~ Plymoutht and Bourne. The 1990 federal census population for communities located within the Buzzards Bay basin was 373,690. Eighty-seven percent of the basin's population receive their water from eleven public water supply systems, nine of these have sources within Buzzards Bay basin. Base water demand is the five-year (1986 to 1990) average day demand for each community. The base water use for water suppliers with sources in Buzzards Bay Basin was 26.40 mgd. Water needs are projected to increase to 32.30 mgd by 2020. The Buzzards Bay basin is a net importer of water from surrounding basins. Of the water used by public water supply systems in the basin, 80% comes from other basins. Fifteen percent of all water used by public water suppliers was returned to the basin as wastewater.
    [Show full text]
  • August Started with Isaias Coming from the Carolinas, Saw Storms Go West
    Community Collaborative Rain, Hail & Snow Network September 2020 2017017 2016 August started with Isaias coming from the Carolinas, saw storms go west to east through Massachusetts and the month ended with storms from north to south through Connecticut. Another dry month as drought conditions grip our area. We broke through 11,000 Daily Reports in April and we smashed through 12,000 Daily Reports in August. More record reporting included. Joe’s feature article explains what every observer wants to know: Are the reports used? The answer is an emphatic YES. Read about how the Weather Forecast Office uses the reports you submit in a typical month. Some news items to share. A tip to use on the mobile app. A tip to use on the website, as well. Plenty of maps, graphs, tables and lists. A record long list of stations that reported all days this month. The Rulers of the Snow make a strong showing every month. And the last page is full of future events. Let’s get into it. Southern New England CoCoRaHS Page 1 September 2020 Newsletter The “Grand” List Congratulations to all of these observers from our three states who have recently passed a milestone of 1000 Daily Reports. 4000 Daily Reports MA-WR-1 Milford 2.3 NNW 3000 Daily Reports RI-NW-7 Little Compton 0.6 E 2000 Daily Reports CT-WN-6 Dayville 2.0 ENE MA-MD-36 Townsend 2.6 S 1000 Daily Reports MA-BA-65 Chatham 0.2 SSE CT-NL-29 East Lyme 0.5 SW CT-NH-47 Seymour 1.5 NE Southern New England CoCoRaHS Page 2 September 2020 Newsletter Uses of CoCoRaHS Data at NWS Boston Joe DelliCarpini – Science & Operations Officer, NWS Boston/Norton MA You submit your Daily Report in the morning.
    [Show full text]