Massachusetts Estuaries Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Massachusetts Estuaries Project Massachusetts Estuaries Project Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for the Slocum’s and Little River Estuaries, Dartmouth, MA University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Massachusetts Department of School of Marine Science and Technology Environmental Protection FINAL REPORT – December 2008 Massachusetts Estuaries Project Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for the Slocum’s and Little River Estuaries, Dartmouth, MA FINAL REPORT – December 2008 Brian Howes Tony Millham Roland Samimy David Schlezinger John Ramsey Trey Ruthven Ed Eichner Contributors: US Geological Survey Don Walters and John Masterson Applied Coastal Research and Engineering, Inc. Elizabeth Hunt and Sean W. Kelley Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Charles Costello and Brian Dudley SMAST Coastal Systems Program Jennifer Benson, Michael Bartlett, Sara Sampieri, and Elizabeth White Lloyd Center for the Environment Mark Mello Cape Cod Commission Xiaotong Wu © [2007] University of Massachusetts All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Massachusetts Estuaries Project Technical Team would like to acknowledge the contributions of the many individuals who have worked tirelessly for the restoration and protection of the critical coastal resources of the Slocum's and Little River Estuaries and supported the application of the Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for these systems. Without these stewards and their efforts, this project would not have been possible. First and foremost we would like to recognize and applaud the significant time and effort in data collection and discussion spent by members of the Coalition for Buzzards Bay's BayWatcher, Water Quality Monitoring Program. These individuals gave of their time to consistent and sound nutrient related water quality from this system for over a decade. These data were enhanced by short-term intensive water quality monitoring efforts by the Lloyd Center Staff and interns participating in the Turn the Tide Project. These multiple efforts have resulted in a solid water quality database for these estuaries, without which the present analysis would not have been possible. Of particular note has been the effort of the Coalition for Buzzards Bay's Monitoring Coordinator, Tony Williams, who has spent countless hours ensuring a scientifically defensible monitoring program and reviewing data and information with MEP Technical Team members. The present MEP Technical Report was developed as part of the on-going partnership project to restore the Town of Dartmouth's estuaries, known as Turn-The-Tide. This program is a partnership between the Town of Dartmouth, the Coalition for Buzzards Bay, the Lloyd Center for the Environment and the Coastal Systems Program at the School for Marine Science and Technology - University of Massachusetts Dartmouth. The goal is to restore water quality and living resources in Dartmouth's three major estuarine systems. Much of the present effort was conducted under this partnership, which greatly enhanced information and data transfers with the Town and its Departments. The Town of Dartmouth and its citizens have expended "extra" effort in the stewardship of these critical coastal systems and are to be commended. Departments and staff from the Town of Dartmouth have provided essential insights toward this effort, particularly the Department of Public Works and its commissioners who oversaw the Turn-The-Tide Project and specifically the help provided by David Hickox; Water and Sewer Division, Steve Sullivan; Animal Control, Sandra Gosselin and Wendy Henderson Board of Health. The technical team would like to specifically acknowledge the efforts of Mike O'Reilly, Dartmouth's Environmental Affairs Coordinator, who worked tirelessly as the Town interface with the Turn-The-Tide Project and was key in facilitating the overall effort. Other individuals of particular note include Mark Rasmussen, Executive Director CBB and Darcy McMahon Director of the Lloyd Center, who helped to guide and disseminate the information from the Turn-The-Tide effort. In addition to local contributions, technical, policy and regulatory support has been freely and graciously provided by Bill Napolitano and Karen Porter from SRPEDD; MaryJo Feurbach and Art Clark of the USEPA; and our MassDEP colleagues: Arleen O’Donnell, Art Screpetis, Rick Dunn, Steve Halterman, and Russ Issacs. We are also thankful for the long hours in the field and laboratory spent by the technical staff, interns and students within the Coastal Systems Program at SMAST-UMD. © [2007] University of Massachusetts All Rights Reserved Support for this project was provided by the Town of Dartmouth through the Turn the Tide Project, private donations from citizens of the Town of Dartmouth, the MassDEP, and the USEPA. This Nutrient Threshold Technical Report to be used by the Town of Dartmouth in the restoration of two of its key estuarine systems is dedicated to Don Tucker former Director of the Lloyd Center, who helped to establish the Turn the Tide partnership project but passed away suddenly before its completion. CITATION Howes B.L., N.P. Millham, S.W. Kelley, J. S. Ramsey, R.I. Samimy, D.R. Schlezinger, E.M. Eichner (2007). Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for the Slocum’s and Little River Estuaries, Dartmouth, Massachusetts. SMAST/DEP Massachusetts Estuaries Project, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. Boston, MA. © [2007] University of Massachusetts All Rights Reserved MASSACHUSETTS ESTUARIES PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................1 I.1 THE MASSACHUSETTS ESTUARIES PROJECT APPROACH ........................................4 I.2 SITE DESCRIPTION...........................................................................................................8 I.3 NITROGEN LOADING ......................................................................................................17 I.4 WATER QUALITY MODELING.........................................................................................18 I.5 REPORT DESCRIPTION..................................................................................................19 II. PREVIOUS STUDIES RELATED TO NITROGEN MANAGEMENT.....................................21 III. DELINEATION OF WATERSHEDS .....................................................................................25 III.1 BACKGROUND...............................................................................................................25 III.2 WATERSHED DELINEATION APPROACH ...................................................................26 IV. WATERSHED NITROGEN LOADING TO EMBAYMENT: LAND USE, STREAM INPUTS, AND SEDIMENT NITROGEN RECYCLING...................................................................31 IV.1 WATERSHED LAND USE BASED NITROGEN LOADING ANALYSIS .........................31 IV.1.1 Land Use and Water Use Database Preparation.....................................................35 IV.1.2 Nitrogen Loading Input Factors................................................................................37 IV.1.3 Calculating Nitrogen Loads ......................................................................................48 IV.2 ATTENUATION OF NITROGEN IN SURFACE WATER TRANSPORT.........................54 IV.2.1 Background and Purpose.........................................................................................54 IV.2.2 Surface water Discharge and Attenuation of Watershed Nitrogen: Stream Discharge from Paskamanset River to head of Slocums River ...............................59 IV.2.3 Surface water Discharge and Attenuation of Watershed Nitrogen: Stream Discharge from Destruction Brook to the head of Slocums River............................70 IV.2.4 Surface water Discharge and Attenuation of Watershed Nitrogen: Stream Discharge Barneys Joy (north) Creek to head of Slocums River.............................76 IV.2.4 Surface water Discharge and Attenuation of Watershed Nitrogen: Stream Discharge Giles Creek to the head of the Slocums River........................................78 IV.3 BENTHIC REGENERATION OF NITROGEN IN BOTTOM SEDIMENTS......................83 IV.3.1 Sediment-Watercolumn Exchange of Nitrogen ........................................................83 IV.3.2 Method for determining sediment-watercolumn nitrogen exchange.........................84 IV.3.3 Rates of Summer Nitrogen Regeneration from Sediments ......................................87 V. HYDRODYNAMIC MODELING ............................................................................................91 V.1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................91 V.2 GEOMORPHIC AND ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECTS TO THE ESTUARINE SYSTEM..92 V.3 FIELD DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS .................................................................92 V.3.1 Data Acquisition ........................................................................................................93 V.3.1.1 Water Elevation ..................................................................................................93 V.3.1.2 Bathymetry..........................................................................................................97 V.3.1.3 Current Measurements .......................................................................................98
Recommended publications
  • Penobscot Rivershed with Licensed Dischargers and Critical Salmon
    0# North West Branch St John T11 R15 WELS T11 R17 WELS T11 R16 WELS T11 R14 WELS T11 R13 WELS T11 R12 WELS T11 R11 WELS T11 R10 WELS T11 R9 WELS T11 R8 WELS Aroostook River Oxbow Smith Farm DamXW St John River T11 R7 WELS Garfield Plt T11 R4 WELS Chapman Ashland Machias River Stream Carry Brook Chemquasabamticook Stream Squa Pan Stream XW Daaquam River XW Whitney Bk Dam Mars Hill Squa Pan Dam Burntland Stream DamXW Westfield Prestile Stream Presque Isle Stream FRESH WAY, INC Allagash River South Branch Machias River Big Ten Twp T10 R16 WELS T10 R15 WELS T10 R14 WELS T10 R13 WELS T10 R12 WELS T10 R11 WELS T10 R10 WELS T10 R9 WELS T10 R8 WELS 0# MARS HILL UTILITY DISTRICT T10 R3 WELS Water District Resevoir Dam T10 R7 WELS T10 R6 WELS Masardis Squapan Twp XW Mars Hill DamXW Mule Brook Penobscot RiverYosungs Lakeh DamXWed0# Southwest Branch St John Blackwater River West Branch Presque Isle Strea Allagash River North Branch Blackwater River East Branch Presque Isle Strea Blaine Churchill Lake DamXW Southwest Branch St John E Twp XW Robinson Dam Prestile Stream S Otter Brook L Saint Croix Stream Cox Patent E with Licensed Dischargers and W Snare Brook T9 R8 WELS 8 T9 R17 WELS T9 R16 WELS T9 R15 WELS T9 R14 WELS 1 T9 R12 WELS T9 R11 WELS T9 R10 WELS T9 R9 WELS Mooseleuk Stream Oxbow Plt R T9 R13 WELS Houlton Brook T9 R7 WELS Aroostook River T9 R4 WELS T9 R3 WELS 9 Chandler Stream Bridgewater T T9 R5 WELS TD R2 WELS Baker Branch Critical UmScolcus Stream lmon Habitat Overlay South Branch Russell Brook Aikens Brook West Branch Umcolcus Steam LaPomkeag Stream West Branch Umcolcus Stream Tie Camp Brook Soper Brook Beaver Brook Munsungan Stream S L T8 R18 WELS T8 R17 WELS T8 R16 WELS T8 R15 WELS T8 R14 WELS Eagle Lake Twp T8 R10 WELS East Branch Howe Brook E Soper Mountain Twp T8 R11 WELS T8 R9 WELS T8 R8 WELS Bloody Brook Saint Croix Stream North Branch Meduxnekeag River W 9 Turner Brook Allagash Stream Millinocket Stream T8 R7 WELS T8 R6 WELS T8 R5 WELS Saint Croix Twp T8 R3 WELS 1 Monticello R Desolation Brook 8 St Francis Brook TC R2 WELS MONTICELLO HOUSING CORP.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for the Gulf of Maine Distinct Population Segment of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar)
    Final Recovery Plan for the Gulf of Maine Distinct Population Segment of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) November, 2005 Prepared by NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Silver Spring, Maryland and Northeastern Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Hadley, Massachusetts Recovery Plan for the Gulf of Maine Distinct Population Segment of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) November, 2005 Prepared by NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Silver Spring, Maryland and Northeastern Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Hadley, Massachusetts Approved: Assistant Administrator for Fisheries Date NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate actions that are thought to be necessary to recover andlor protect endangered species. Recovery plans are prepared by NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and sometimes with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, state agencies and others. This Recovery Plan for the Gulf of Maine (GOM) Distinct Population Segment (DPS) of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) was prepared by the staff of the Northeast Regional Offices of NMFS with the assistance of the FWS and the Maine Atlantic Salmon Commission (ASC). While the State of Maine provided recommendations for this plan, it was developed using federal guidelines and policies pertaining to recovery plans for federally listed species. Recovery plans are not regulatory or decision documents. The recommendations in a recovery plan are not considered final decisions unless and until they are actually proposed for implementation. Objectives will only be attained and hnds expended contingent upon appropriations, priorities and other budgetary constraints.
    [Show full text]
  • The Acushnet River Restoration Project: Restoring Diadromous Populations to a Superfund Site in Southeastern Massachusetts
    Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-56 The Acushnet River Restoration Project: Restoring Diadromous Populations to a Superfund Site in Southeastern Massachusetts J.J. Sheppard1, S. Block2, H.L Becker3, and D. Quinn4 1Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries South Shore Field Station 1213 Purchase Street, 3rd Floor New Bedford, MA 02740 2National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Restoration Center 55 Great Republic Drive Gloucester, MA 01930 3EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc 221 Sun Valley Boulevard, Suite D Lincoln, NE 68528 4DQ Engineering 11 Hickory Lane Walpole, MA 02081 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Department of Fish and Game Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report Technical March 2014 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report Series Managing Editor: Michael P. Armstrong Technical and Copy Editor: Elaine Brewer The Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Reports present information and data pertinent to the management, biology and commercial and recreational fisheries of anadromous, estuarine, and marine organisms of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and adjacent waters. The series presents information in a timely fashion that is of limited scope or is useful to a smaller, specific audience and therefore may not be appropriate for national or international journals. Included in this series are data summaries, reports of monitoring programs, and results of studies that are directed at specific management problems. All Reports in the series are available for download in PDF format at: http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/dmf/publications/technical.html or hard copies may be obtained from the Annisquam River Marine Fisheries Station, 30 Emerson Ave., Gloucester, MA 01930 USA (978-282-0308).
    [Show full text]
  • Penobscot Bay Watch
    PENOBSCOTBAY Maine National Estuary Program Nomination STATE OF MAINE OFFICEOF THE GOVERNOR AUGUSTA. MAINE 04333 ANGUS S. KING, JR. GOVERNOR March 6, 1995 Administrator Carol Browner US. Environmental Protection Agency 401 M. Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20460 Dear Ms. Browner: 1 am pleased to submit a State of Maine Conference Agreement that nominates Penobscot Bay for designation in the National Estuary Program. The Agreement describes the Bay's key issues and actions to respond to them, how we will continue to involve the public in developing and implementing solutions to these most pressing issues, and how we propose to finance this estuary project. Our nomination for Penobscot Bay is consistent with EPA's December; 1994 guidance that calls for considerable initiative by a state before requesting designation. Public and private entities have worked cooperatively since 1992 and made remarkable progress. Two major conferences have brought together all levels of government, the nonprofit community, Bay businesses and the public to talk openly about key issues and possible solutions. These and other activities described in the attached document have laid a solid foundation for a successful national estuaq project. I believe our estuary project will be successfully implemented because of the active participation of five state agencies over the past three years. These agencies (the Departments of Environmental Protection, Marine Resources, Inland Fisheries and Wildlife. Economic and Community Developmenf and the State Planning Office) are committed to this project and I am confident that in concert with our nonprofit, municipal and business partners we will m&e important strides to protect and restore Penobscot Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • BBP8911 Technical Resource Manual
    TECHNICAL RESOURCE MANUAL: A REFERENCE FOR BUZZARDS BAY COWUNITIES AUGUST 1987 Credits Compiled, with additional text, by Susan R. Moor and William S. Napolitano Stephen C. Smith, Executive Director Thomas A. Pisaturo, Comprehensive Planning Manager Tracy Cabral, Secretary Anne Duf resne, Secretary , - This report was prepared by the Southeastern Regional Planning and Economic Development District (SRPEDD), with funding from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Buzzards Bay Project. u This report represents the technical results of an investigation funded by the Buzzards Bay Project. The results and conclusions contained herein are those of the author(s). These conclusions have been reviewed by competent outside reviewers and found to be reasonable and legitimate based on the available data. The Management Committee of the Buzzards Bay Project accepts this report as technically sound and complete. The conclusions do not necessarily represent the recommendations of the Buzzards Bay Project. Final recommendations for resource management actions will be based upon the results of this and other investigations. Environmental Protection ~gency Thomas Bigford National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Steve Bliven Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management Leigh Bridges Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Jack Clarke Cape Cod Planning and Economic Development Commission Richard De,laney Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management Meriel Hardin Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering Dr. Russell Isaac Massachusetts Division of Water Pollution Control Dr. Susan Peterson President, Coalition for Buzzards Bay Dr. Don Phelps Environmental Protection Agency Ted Pratt Chairman, Buzzards Bay Citizens Advisory Committee Stephen Smith Southeast Regional Planning and Economic Development District BNC~Tripp Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs This report represents the technical results of an investigation funded by the Buzzards Bay Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)
    VOLUME 2 OF 4 BRISTOL COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Bristol County COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ACUSHNET, TOWN OF 250048 ATTLEBORO, CITY OF 250049 BERKLEY, TOWN OF 250050 DARTMOUTH, TOWN OF 250051 DIGHTON, TOWN OF 250052 EASTON, TOWN OF 250053 FAIRHAVEN, TOWN OF 250054 FALL RIVER, CITY OF 250055 FREETOWN, TOWN OF 250056 MANSFIELD, TOWN OF 250057 NEW BEDFORD, CITY OF 255216 NORTH ATTLEBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250059 NORTON, TOWN OF 250060 RAYNHAM, TOWN OF 250061 REHOBOTH, TOWN OF 250062 SEEKONK, TOWN OF 250063 SOMERSET, TOWN OF 255220 SWANSEA, TOWN OF 255221 TAUTON, CITY OF 250066 WESTPORT, TOWN OF 255224 REVISED JULY 16, 2014 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25005CV002B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for the community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone New Zone A1 through A30 AE V1 through V30 VE (shaded) B X C X Part or all of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the Flood Insurance Study.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternatives Evaluation Report: Penobscot River Phase III
    ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION REPORT Penobscot River Phase III Engineering Study Penobscot River Estuary, Maine Prepared for: United States District Court District of Maine Prepared by: Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 511 Congress Street, Suite 200 Portland, Maine 04101 Project No. 3616166052 September 2018 ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION REPORT Penobscot River Phase III Engineering Study Penobscot River Estuary, Maine Prepared for: United States District Court District of Maine Prepared by: Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 511 Congress Street, Suite 200 Portland, Maine 04101 Project No. 3616166052 September 2018 _____________________ __________________ Nelson Walter, P.E. Eugene Shephard, P.E. Principal Project Manager Associate Engineer US District Court – District of Maine Alternatives Evaluation Report Penobscot River Phase III Engineering Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In January 2016, the United States District Court for the District of Maine (the Court) selected Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (Amec Foster Wheeler) to conduct the Penobscot River Phase III Engineering Study (Phase III Engineering Study), to identify and evaluate feasible, effective and cost-effective measures to remediate mercury in the Penobscot River Estuary (the Estuary). The geographic area to be addressed within the Phase III Engineering Study is described by the Court as “the region from the site of the former Veazie Dam south to Upper Penobscot Bay, including Mendall Marsh and the Orland River." Beginning in 1967, a chlor-alkali facility located in Orrington, Maine released mercury into the Estuary. Releases of mercury at overall declining concentrations continued throughout facility operation and ceased with facility closure in 2000. In 2002, the Court ordered an independent scientific study, the Penobscot River Mercury Study, to assess the spatial distribution and impact of mercury discharge in the Penobscot River.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase II Report Chapter 14. Temporal and Geographic Trends in Mercury
    PENOBSCOT RIVER MERCURY STUDY Chapter 14 Temporal and geographic trends in mercury in biota in the Penobscot estuary Submitted to Judge John Woodcock United States District Court (District of Maine) April 2013 By A.D. Kopec1 and R.A. Bodaly1 1. Penobscot River Mercury Study Fish and Shellfish Collections Kimberley Payne, Rick Simmons, Marcia Bowen, Corey Francis, Chuck Porembski, Ethan Sobo, Steve Lee, Sheila and Mike Dassatt Normandeau Associates, Inc. 8 Fundy Road Falmouth, Maine 04105 Bird and Mammal Collections Oksana Lane, David Evers, Lucas Savoy, Wing Goodale, David Yates Biodiversity Research Institute 652 Maine Street Gorham, Maine 04038 Black Duck Collections Kelsey Sullivan, Brad Allen, Houston Cady Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Bangor Research Office 650 State Street Bangor, Maine 04401 1 SUMMARY Mercury (Hg) concentrations in fish, birds and bats were monitored between 2006 and 2010 in the lower Penobscot River, upper Penobscot Bay and in upstream and coastal reference sites. The monitoring study was designed to examine trends in Hg concentrations over time, the geographic pattern of Hg contamination in relation to the HoltraChem site, health threats created by the Hg contamination, and the severity of the contamination in comparison to other sites sampled throughout the world. Note that the current four to five-year monitoring period is insufficient to determine long-term trends in the region. The presence or absence of significant trends in Hg concentrations over time is relevant only for the current monitoring period. Between 2006 and 2010 we found significant variation in Hg concentrations at a few sites, but no overall trends in most species of biota, including fish (American eels, tomcod, rainbow smelt, winter flounder), lobster, and birds (Nelson’s sparrow, song sparrow, swamp sparrow, red-winged blackbird, Virginia rail).
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Annual Report Maine Coast Heritage Trust Works
    2001 Annual Report Maine Coast Heritage Trust works to conserve coastal and other lands that define Maine’s distinct landscape, protect its environment, sustain its outdoor traditions and promote the well-being of its people. Since 1970, MCHT has helped to protect permanently more than 111,000 acres including valuable wildlife habitat, farm and forest land and 275 entire coastal islands. MCHT provides conservation services to landowners, local land trusts, government agencies and communities throughout Maine. As a membership organization, MCHT is supported by individuals committed to protecting Maine’s natural beauty and resources. The Trust invites your support and involvement. On the cover: Tinker Island, Blue Hill © Sara Gray 2001 Annual Report CHRIS HAMILTON North Haven PRESIDENT’S AND CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE In August 2001, we announced our Campaign for the Coast – a $100 million campaign that seeks to preserve the best of Maine’s coast for generations to come. Recognizing the threats posed by increasing development, we committed to accelerating our work to conserve coastal islands and archipelagos, prominent hills and meadows, shore access, community open space and intact landscape features. Campaign Chairman Richard Rockefeller inspired us to launch this ambitious effort and has stood at the helm ever since. He leads by example – guiding us with keen perception, good humor and unflagging energy. The Campaign’s success to date is due – in no small part – to his integral involvement. Already the Campaign for the Coast has expanded the horizon of land conservation in Maine, enabling protection of lands that could never before have been preserved. Among the 36 projects completed in 2001 are some of the most innovative and complex ones in MCHT’s history.
    [Show full text]
  • The North American Wetlands Conservation Act: Working for Massachusetts
    The North American Wetlands Conservation Act: Working for Massachusetts The North American Wetlands Conservation Act (NAWCA) is an incentive-based, landowner- friendly program that fosters the development of public-private partnerships to protect North America’s migratory bird habitat. NAWCA Positively Impacts the Economy and Creates Jobs The Great Marsh NAWCA benefits the national economy by translating $411 million in federal appropriations into nearly $3.5 billion in additional economic activity in the United States. These expenditures have created, on average, nearly 7,500 new jobs annually in the United States, generating over $200 million in worker earnings each year. NAWCA Effectively Leverages Private Sector Funds Since enactment, NAWCA grants have leveraged more than $3.2 billion in matching funds to deliver a total of over $4.2 billion in on-the-ground conservation. NAWCA requires a 1:1 match, but federal funds are often tripled or quadrupled by partners at the local level. NAWCA Expands Recreational Opportunities For People Photo courtesy of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service The abundance of wildlife including many species of water- fowl, migratory birds, fish, and mammals supported by wet- The Great Marsh is the largest salt marsh in New lands translates into multi-billion dollar activities for Americans England and is internationally recognized as important who enjoy hunting, fishing, wildlife viewing, and photography. breeding ground and habitat for waterfowl, waterbirds, shorebirds, and many more. The area also offers NAWCA Benefits Hundreds Of Wildlife Species recreational opportunities throughout the North Shore. NAWCA helps fulfill the mission of the North American Wa- terfowl Management Plan by providing migratory birds with To secure and restore 563 acres of wetlands in the essential habitat needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands Characterization
    k o o r B w o d a e M An Approach to Conserving Maine's Natural r e LEGEND Space for Plants, Animals, and People e D D This map depicts all wetlands shown on National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps, but e www..begiinniingwr iitthhabiittatt..org e categorized them based on a subset of wetland functions. This map and its depiction J p E e v F i F C of wetland features neither substitute for nor eliminate the need to perform on-the- E R B A R o ground wetland delineation and functional assessment. In no way shall use of this map L S v e O SNupplementary Map 7 e n A N r e diminish or alter the regulatory protection that all wetlands are accorded under y B D applicable State and Federal laws. For more information about wetlands characterization, r contact Elizabeth Hertz at the Maine Department of Conservation (207-287-8061, o Wetlands Cha racterization ok Wetlands Characterization [email protected]). 32 Damariscotta Damariscotta )" 215 W )" Lake N Sheepscot River A This map is non-regulatory and is intended for planning purposes only O The Wetlands Characterization model is a planning tool intended to help identify likely L 213 B Kalers Drainage )" D wetland functions associated with significant wetland resources and adjacent uplands. L O Pond E Using GIS analysis, this map provides basic information regarding what ecological B B O O services various wetlands are likely to provide. These ecological services, each of which R R O has associated economic benefits, include: floodflow control, sediment retention, finfish O habitat, and/or shellfish habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Summary of Proposed Changes
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) Unit C00, Clark Pond, Massachusetts Summary of Proposed Changes Type of Unit: System Unit County: Essex Congressional District: 6 Existing Map: The existing CBRS map depicting this unit is: ■ 025 dated October 24, 1990 Proposed Boundary Notice of Availability: The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (Service) opened a public comment period on the proposed changes to Unit C00 via Federal Register notice. The Federal Register notice and the proposed boundary (accessible through the CBRS Projects Mapper) are available on the Service’s website at www.fws.gov/cbra. Establishment of Unit: The Coastal Barrier Resources Act (Pub. L. 97-348), enacted on October 18, 1982 (47 FR 52388), originally established Unit C00. Historical Changes: The CBRS map for this unit has been modified by the following legislative and/or administrative actions: ■ Coastal Barrier Improvement Act (Pub. L. 101-591) enacted on November 16, 1990 (56 FR 26304) For additional information on historical legislative and administrative actions that have affected the CBRS, see: https://www.fws.gov/cbra/Historical-Changes-to-CBRA.html. Proposed Changes: The proposed changes to Unit C00 are described below. Proposed Removals: ■ One structure and undeveloped fastland near Rantoul Pond along Fox Creek Road ■ Four structures and undeveloped fastland located to the north of Argilla Road and east of Fox Creek Proposed Additions: ■ Undeveloped fastland and associated aquatic habitat along Treadwell Island Creek,
    [Show full text]