DOCSLIB.ORG

Massdot Is Committed to Improving the Quality of Stormwater Runoff from Its Highways

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Massdot Is Committed to Improving the Quality of Stormwater Runoff from Its Highways MassDOT is committed to improving the quality of stormwater runoff from its highways. Through the “Impaired Waters Program,” MassDOT addresses stormwater runoff from its roadways draining to impaired water bodies as part of compliance with the NPDES Phase II Small MS4 General Permit. Stormwater best management practices (BMPs) are implemented to the maximum extent practicable through two methods: retrofit projects and programmed projects. Retrofit projects are tracked within the MassDOT Impaired Waters Program Database, while programmed projects are tracked through this Water Quality Data Form (WQDF). The goal of the WQDF is to raise awareness of the necessity to implement stormwater BMPs during programmed projects and to capture information about stormwater BMPs that are implemented. There are two WQDFs required as part of each programmed project. One is specific to the 25% design stage, and the other is specific to the 75% design stage. Please download the latest version of the WQDF from the MassDOT website. Please fill out the tab titled “75% Design Form,” and check the box at the bottom of the form to ensure that all questions have been answered adequately. Please submit this form in Excel format only and name your file with the convention WQDF25_projectnumber.xlsm. Submit the form to your MassDOT project manager as part of the project's electronic submittal. An interactive web map is available to aid in filling out the WQDF. It is available at http://mass.gov/massdot/map/wqdf. If MassDOT has requested that the form be revised and resubmitted, resubmit the form using the naming convention WQDF75_projectnumber_rev.xlsm. If multiple copies of the form are required to capture information for more than four receiving water bodies, use the naming convention WQDF75_projectnumber_#of#.xlsm, where the first # represents a unique number identifier between 1 and the total number of 75% forms being submitted for the project area, and the second # represents the total number of 75% forms being submitted for the project area. Refer to the tab titled "75% Design Instructions" for detailed instructions specifying how to answer each question. Forms should be submitted to the MassDOT project manager for routing to Environmental Services. Thank you for filling out the 75% WQDF and supporting the Impaired Waters Program. 75% Design Water Quality Data Form v. 08/2014 75% Design Water Quality Data Form Instructions General Instructions: All yellow cells in the 75% Design Checklist tab must be filled out before the form is submitted. Input prompts, red error text, and message boxes are used to validate the data as it is input into the form. Please carefully adhere to the instructions they provide. After the form is complete, check the box at the bottom of the form. If the red text below the check box disappears, all required fields have entries, and the form may be submitted. The "Form Reset" button at the top of the form can be used to delete the contents of the yellow cells and start over. All worksheets in this workbook are protected. Submission: Submit this form to your MassDOT project manager as part of the project's electronic submittal. To Return to Question 1, Click Here Project Information Questions: 1. Have you downloaded the most recent version of the Water Quality Data Form? Please visit MassDOT's website to obtain the latest version of this form. Updates will be released periodically with new information about receiving water bodies. If the answer to this question is "No", an error message will be displayed indicating that the newest version of the form is required. To Return to Question 1, Click Here For questions 2-5, please use MassDOT's Project Information Look-Up Website to populate the yellow fields. 2. Project Number (From Project Info Website): Enter the MassDOT-assigned 4 to 6-digit project number. This information can be found using the MassDOT Project Information Look-Up link provided. To Return to Question 2, Click Here 3. Project Type (From Project Info Website): Use the drop-down menu to select the best description of the project type. Select "Other" if none apply. This information can be found using the MassDOT Project Information Look-Up link provided. To Return to Question 3, Click Here 4. Project Name (From Project Info Website): Enter the project name to provide additional information about the project location and objective. Keep response under 300 characters. This information can be found using the MassDOT Project Information Look-Up link provided. To Return to Question 4, Click Here 5. Location of Project (From Project Info Website): Project Road(s): Enter the road names and/or numbers that the project is targeting. Separate multiple entries with a comma and space. Cities and/or Towns: Enter the cities and/or town that the project area lies in. Separate multiple entries with a comma and space. District Number: Use the drop-down menu to select the primary MassDOT district that the project area lies in. To Return to Question 5, Click Here 6. Project Designer: Design Firm: Enter the name of the firm that will be responsible for follow-up concerning the 25% Water Quality Data Form. Contact Person for Follow-Up: Enter the name of the person within the firm that will be responsible for follow-up concerning the 25% Water Quality Data Form. MassDOT will reach out to this person if any questions arise concerning information provided on the form. Email Address for Follow-Up: Enter a valid email address for the contact person listed. Phone Number for Follow-Up: Enter a phone number that connects directly to the contact person listed. If applicable, provide an extension as well. To Return to Question 6, Click Here BMPs Implemented at the Site: 7. What is the WPA filing for this project? Determine what type of Wetlands Protection Act (WPA) filing is required for your project. Options include Bridge Exempt, NOI, None, RDA, Variance, and Other. The options are explained as follows: • Bridge Exempt - Select if the project is a footprint bridge replacement part of the Accelerated Bridge Program and is exempt from the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act based on language included in Transportation Bond Bills • Notice of Intent (NOI) - Select if a determination has been made that the work and activity will alter an area regulated under the WPA • None - Select if the BMP is clearly outside of a jurisdictional area • Request for Determination of Applicability (RDA) - Select if further guidance is needed from the Conservation Commission regarding whether or not the location or activity is located in an area regulated under the WPA, such as Land Under Water or the Ocean, Bordering Vegetated Wetland, Salt Marsh, Inland or Coastal Bank, Bordering or Isolated Land Subject to Flooding, Beaches, Dunes, or other • Variance - Select if it is known that the work cannot meet the WPA performance standards and is not a Limited Project • Other - Select if none of the above options apply To Return to Question 7, Click Here 8. How much impervious area (sq. ft.) is being added to or removed from existing conditions for the entire project? Provide an estimate of the number of square feet of impervious surface that the project will add to or remove from the site. This number should reflect the change from existing conditions, so the answer should be positive if impervious surface is being added as a result of the project or negative if it is being removed. Definition of Impervious: The total area of a parcel or section of right-of-way that consists of buildings and associated constructed facilities; areas that are covered with a low- permeability material such as asphalt or concrete; or areas such as gravel roads and unpaved parking areas that are compacted through design or use to reduce their permeability. Common impervious areas include, but are not limited to, roads, rooftops, walkways, patios, driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, packed earthen materials, and macadam or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. To Return to Question 8, Click Here 75% Design Water Quality Data Form v. 08/2014 75% Design Water Quality Data Form Instructions 9. Select which non-structural stormwater BMPs will be implemented on site: Check the boxes next to any non-structural stormwater BMPs that were implemented as part of the project. Use discretion and only select those options which were well incorporated into site planning and design. To Return to Question 9, Click Here 10. How many water bodies on MassDEP's Year 2012 Integrated List of Waters receive stormwater runoff from the area impacted by this project (via any combination of piped or over land flow)? Count the number of water bodies included on MassDEP's Year 2012 Integrated List of Waters that receive stormwater runoff from the project area. The 2012 list of water bodies and their impairments is collated in the "Water Body Information" tab of this workbook, and it can be referenced spatially using the MassDOT Interactive Web Map. Note that some rivers are divided into multiple segments. These segments are listed separately and should be considered as separate water bodies. Consider stormwater runoff that discharges to a listed water body via any combination of piped or over land flow. If stormwater runoff from the project area drains to a catch basin/inlet that drains to a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4), either owned by MassDOT or by another state agency or municipality, determine if the system outfalls to a listed water body. If the receiving water body cannot be determined definitively, make the best possible assumption based on topography and the layout of drainage system.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Project Descriptions for July 10, 2019 Board of Trustees Meeting Clean
    Project Descriptions for July 10, 2019 Board of Trustees Meeting Clean Water Commitments Bourne CW-19-07 The project involves construction of a new 100,000 gpd package wastewater treatment facility with subsurface discharge on town-owned land. The plant is designed using MBR technology. A Groundwater Discharge Permit has been approved for the plant and discharge. Based on detailed site testing and groundwater modeling, treated effluent will move towards the Cape Cod Canal. Added capacity is needed to handle flows above the 200,000 gpd capacity owned by Bourne in the Wareham WWTF. That plant, where no added capacity is available for Bourne's use, discharges to the Agawam River. Existing sewer flows from a portion of Bourne's sewered area will be intercepted and re-directed to the new treatment plant, redirecting treated effluent away from the Agawam River. Fall River CW-18-38 The City of Fall River's WWTF is aging and requires rehabilitation/upgrade to maintain reliable operation and performance. Additionally, EPA has indicated its intent to include a nitrogen limit in the City's next NPDES permit. Mt. Hope Bay is listed as impaired; Fall River's wet weather discharges and operational SSOs contribute to its impairment. Recent air quality regulations (Title V) necessitated shut down of the WWTF incinerator. Liquid sludge is trucked off site for disposal, dramatically increasing disposal costs. Administrative facilities are ineffective and undersized for current needs. Site electrical and security issues will also be addressed. Norton CW-18-43 This project involves providing new sanitary sewers to reduce pollution caused from the failed and malfunctioning private onsite sewage disposal systems, and more specifically the already failed systems at the Woodland Meadows Elderly Housing development.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment for the Industri-Plex Superfund Site Town of W Oburn, Middlesex County, Massachusetts
    Rest oration Plan and Environmental Asses sment for the Industri-Plex Superfund Site Draft for Public Review February 19, 2020 Prepared by: Industri-Plex NRDAR Trustee Council Commonwealth of Massachusetts U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration With support from: Abt Associates 6130 Executive Boulevard Rockville, MD 20852 Abt Associates Report Title Insert Date ▌1-1 This page intentionally left blank Industri-Plex RP/EA February 19, 2020 ▌i CONTENTS CONTENTS List of Acronyms ...................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. vi 1. Introduction to the Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment ..................... 1 1.1. Trustee Responsibilities and Authorities ................................................................. 1 1.2. Summary of Industri-Plex NRDAR Settlement ........................................................ 2 1.3. Summary of Natural Resource Injuries ................................................................... 2 1.4. Purpose and Need for Restoration .......................................................................... 4 1.5. Restoration Goals ...................................................................................................4 1.6. Coordination and Scoping ....................................................................................... 4
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Smarter in Plymouth's Fifth Century; Master Plan 2004-2024
    i PLYMOUTH PLANNING BOARD LORING TRIPP, Chair PAUL MCALDUFF NICHOLAS FILLA, Vice Chair WENDY GARPOW, ALTERNATE LARRY ROSENBLUM MALCOLM MCGREGOR PLYMOUTH MASTER PLAN COMMITTEE (2004) ENZO MONTI, Chair JOHN MARTINI RUTH AOKI, Vice Chair LARRY ROSENBLUM AILEEN DROEGE IRA SMITH SASH ERSKINE LORING TRIPP ELAINE SCHWOTZER LUTZ CHARLES VANDINI PREVIOUS MEMBERS OF THE MASTER PLAN COMMITTEE THOMAS BOTT JAMES MASON TERRY DONOGHUE MARY MULCAHY WILLIAM FRANKS DON QUINN ROBERTA GRIMES ROBERT REIFEISS REBECCA HALL TOM WALLACE GERRE HOOKER BRIAN WHITFIELD LOUISE HOUSTON MARK WITHINGTON TOM MALONEY DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT LEE HARTMANN, AICP MASTER PLAN CONSULTANT MICHAEL PESSOLANO EDITING AND GRAPHIC DESIGN: GOODY, CLANCY & ASSOCIATES Photos: Larry Rosenblum Paul McAlduff Goody Clancy Thanks to everyone in Plymouth who helped create the Master Plan. GROWING SMARTER IN PLYMOUTH’S FIFTH CENTURY Town of Plymouth, Massachusetts Master Plan, 2004–2024 Plymouth Planning Board Master Plan Committee August 2006 Table of Contents VISION STATEMENT FOR PLYMOUTH, MASSACHUSETTS MASTER PLAN OVERVIEW 1. LAND USE 2. NATURAL RESOURCES 3. OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 4. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES 5. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 6. PUBLIC FACILITIES/SERVICES 7. TRANSPORTATION APPENDIX: MAPS vi Vision Statement for Plymouth, Massachusetts In 20 years, the Town of Plymouth will be a beautiful, maturing community with vibrant and pleasant village centers, a preserved and enhanced historic heritage, long stretches of accessible coastline, integrated areas of commerce and compact housing, and vast, connected areas of open space set aside for preservation, outdoor activities, and appreciation of nature. Plymouth will retain its outstanding visual character, de- fined by clean ponds, rivers, wetlands, coastline, and forests.
    [Show full text]
  • River Herring Viewing Guide
    Each spring, MILLIONS of river herring migrate into Massachusetts waters, returning to their place of birth to create a new generation! This guide offers information on fifteen of our states busiest fish passage locations. VIEWING GUIDE Life Cycle of a Herring Adults migrate upstream to FRESHWATER Egg laying (spawning) happens in the same river they hatched! Blueback Herring Spawn in late April through June when water temperatures reach 57ºF Surviving adults migrate downstream to SALTWATER Young fish stay in freshwater until they are mature enough Alewife to migrate to estuaries Spawn in late March to mid-May, when water temperatures reach 51ºF estuary, noun. [es·tu·ary] 1. a place where freshwater meets the ocean What is a “fish ladder”? By the numbers... There are 13 diadromous species in A manmade structure (which often resembles a Massachusetts, including river herring, ladder with steps) that allows fish swimming up- Rainbow Smelt American eels, and rainbow smelt! stream to get past barriers like dams, waterfalls, and locks. Smelt spawn at night in freshwater from early March through May. Mass DMF designs and installs eel ramps Female rainbow smelt can lay in coastal rivers to assist their upstream between 5,000 and 80,000 eggs! migrations. 9 have been installed in Massachusetts since 2007! Weir pools are made There are over 100 separate river up of a series of herring runs in Massachusetts! small pools of regular length to create a American Eel Since 2013, 23,500 river herring have long, sloping channel for The only catadromous fish in North been stocked throughout the region by fish to travel upstream.
    [Show full text]
  • GOVPUB-CS1-4C9e09d16748d10e2bdd184198d2c071-1.Pdf
    I 1 Proi Of RECORDS, [NISTRATION f 4&**i /$ Tio,r «c0iSrte^u REGISTER OF ALL OFFICERS AND AGENTS, CIVIL, MILITARY, AND NAVAL, IN SERVICETHE OF THE UNITED STATES, ON The Thirtieth September, 1851. WITH THE NAMES, FORCER AND CONDITION OP ALL SHIPS AND VESSELS BELONG-- ING TO THE UNITED STATES, AND WHEN AND WHERE BUILT ; TOGETHER WITH THE NAMES AND COMPENSATION OF ALL PRINTERS IN ANY WAX EMPLOYED BY CONGRESS, OB ANY DEPARTMENT OR OFFICER OF THE GOVERNMENT. PREPARED AT THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE, In pursuance of Resolutions of Congress of April 27,1816, and July 14,1832. WASHINGTON: GIDEON AND CO., PRINTERS. 1851. RESOLUTION requiring the Secretary of State to compile and print, once in every two years, a register of all officers and agents, civil, military, and naval, in the service ot tne United States. Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Con­ gress assembled, That, once in two years, a Register, containing correct lists of all the officers and agents, civil, military, and naval, in the service of the United States, made up to the last day of September of each year in which a new Congress is to assemble, be compiled and printed, under the direction of the Secretary for the Department of State. And, to ena­ ble him to form such Register, he, for his own Department, and the Heads of the other De­ partments, respectively, shall, in due time, cause such lists as aforesaid, of all officers and agents, in their respective Departments, including clerks, cadets, and midshipmen, to be made and lodged in the office of the Department of State.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Northeast Regional Mercury Total Maximum Daily Load
    DRAFT Northeast Regional Mercury Total Maximum Daily Load Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Maine Department of Environmental Protection Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission April 2007 DRAFT Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................................ii Tables ..........................................................................................................................................................iv Figures.........................................................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................................v Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................vi Abbreviations ...........................................................................................................................................xiii Definition of Terms..................................................................................................................................xvi
    [Show full text]
  • Concord River Diadromous Fish Restoration FEASIBILITY STUDY
    Concord River Diadromous Fish Restoration FEASIBILITY STUDY Concord River, Massachusetts Talbot Mills Dam Centennial Falls Dam Middlesex Falls DRAFT REPORT FEBRUARY 2016 Prepared for: In partnership with: Prepared by: This page intentionally left blank. Executive Summary Concord River Diadromous Fish Restoration FEASIBILITY STUDY – DRAFT REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Purpose The purpose of this project is to evaluate the feasibility of restoring populations of diadromous fish to the Concord, Sudbury, and Assabet Rivers, collectively known as the SuAsCo Watershed. The primary impediment to fish passage in the Concord River is the Talbot Mills Dam in Billerica, Massachusetts. Prior to reaching the dam, fish must first navigate potential obstacles at the Essex Dam (an active hydro dam with a fish elevator and an eel ladder) on the Merrimack River in Lawrence, Middlesex Falls (a natural bedrock falls and remnants of a breached dam) on the Concord River in Lowell, and Centennial Falls Dam (a hydropower dam with a fish ladder), also on the Concord River in Lowell. Blueback herring Alewife American shad American eel Sea lamprey Species targeted for restoration include both species of river herring (blueback herring and alewife), American shad, American eel, and sea lamprey, all of which are diadromous fish that depend upon passage between marine and freshwater habitats to complete their life cycle. Reasons The impact of diadromous fish species extends for pursuing fish passage restoration in the far beyond the scope of a single restoration Concord River watershed include the importance and historical presence of the project, as they have a broad migratory range target species, the connectivity of and along the Atlantic coast and benefit commercial significant potential habitat within the and recreational fisheries of other species.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of 2017 Massachusetts Piping Plover Census Data
    SUMMARY OF THE 2017 MASSACHUSETTS PIPING PLOVER CENSUS Bill Byrne, MassWildlife SUMMARY OF THE 2017 MASSACHUSETTS PIPING PLOVER CENSUS ABSTRACT This report summarizes data on abundance, distribution, and reproductive success of Piping Plovers (Charadrius melodus) in Massachusetts during the 2017 breeding season. Observers reported breeding pairs of Piping Plovers present at 147 sites; 180 additional sites were surveyed at least once, but no breeding pairs were detected at them. The population increased 1.4% relative to 2016. The Index Count (statewide census conducted 1-9 June) was 633 pairs, and the Adjusted Total Count (estimated total number of breeding pairs statewide for the entire 2017 breeding season) was 650.5 pairs. A total of 688 chicks were reported fledged in 2017, for an overall productivity of 1.07 fledglings per pair, based on data from 98.4% of pairs. Prepared by: Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife 2 SUMMARY OF THE 2017 MASSACHUSETTS PIPING PLOVER CENSUS INTRODUCTION Piping Plovers are small, sand-colored shorebirds that nest on sandy beaches and dunes along the Atlantic Coast from North Carolina to Newfoundland. The U.S. Atlantic Coast population of Piping Plovers has been federally listed as Threatened, pursuant to the U.S. Endangered Species Act, since 1986. The species is also listed as Threatened by the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife pursuant to Massachusetts’ Endangered Species Act. Population monitoring is an integral part of recovery efforts for Atlantic Coast Piping Plovers (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1996, Hecht and Melvin 2009a, b). It allows wildlife managers to identify limiting factors, assess effects of management actions and regulatory protection, and track progress toward recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Boston Regional Climate Change Adaptation Strategy - WORKING DRAFT
    Metro Boston Regional Climate Change Adaptation Strategy - WORKING DRAFT - Funding provided by the Federal Sustainable Communities Program and the Barr Foundation Revised June 2015 By: Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place Boston, MA 02111 617.933.0700 www.mapc.org With assistance from: Tellus Institute 11 Arlington St. Boston, MA 02116 Acknowledgements This report was originally produced in June 2014 by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council, and revised on June 1 , 2015 after discussion and approval by the MAPC Executive Committee. Technical assistance was provided by Martin Pillsbury, Environmental Director (Project Manager); Julie Conroy, Senior Environmental Planner (Primary Author); Sam Cleaves, Senior Regional Planner (Author); Bill Wang, GIS Analyst; and Barry Keppard, Public Health Division Manager; James Goldstein, Senior Fellow, Tellus Institute; and William Dougherty, President, Climate Change Research Group. Editing and continued guidance was provided by Marc Draisen, MAPC Executive Director. The Metro-Boston Regional Climate Change Adaptation Strategy (RCCAS) was undertaken with funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Sustainable Communities Program and the Barr Foundation. We would also like to thank the MAPC Officers for their continued support: Lynn Duncan, President; Keith Bergman, Vice President; Shirronda Almeida, Secretary; and Taber Keally, Treasurer. Special appreciation goes to the members of the RCCAS Advisory Committee for their continuous assistance and leadership: John Bolduc Environmental Planner Cambridge Community Development Dept. Wayne Castonguay Executive Director Ipswich River Watershed Assoc. Hunt Durey Acting Director MA Dept. of Ecological Restoration Kwabena Kyei-Aboagye MA Urban Program Manager U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Official List of Public Waters
    Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area).
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Audubon Annual Report 2020
    2020 Annual Report Contents Cover Photo: Arcadia Wildlife Sanctuary Volunteer 01 Letter from the President & Board Chair 02 Fiscal Year 2020 Highlights 03 A Pivotal Pandemic 04 Successes Across the State 08 Land Conservation Summary Fiscal Year 2020 11 Supporters 17 Mass Audubon Board of Directors 2020 18 Mass Audubon Wildlife Sanctuaries, Nature Centers, & Museums Mass Audubon protects more than 38,000 acres of land throughout Massachusetts, saving birds and other wildlife, and making nature accessible to all. As Massachusetts’ largest nature conservation nonprofit, we welcome more than a half million visitors a year to our wildlife sanctuaries and 20 nature centers. From inspiring hilltop views to breathtaking coastal landscapes, serene woods, and working farms, we believe in protecting our state’s natural treasures for wildlife and for all people—a vision shared in 1896 by our founders, two extraordinary Boston women. Today, Mass Audubon is a nationally recognized environmental education leader, offering thousands of camp, school, and adult programs that get over 225,000 kids and adults outdoors every year. With more than 135,000 members and supporters, we advocate on Beacon Hill and beyond, and conduct conservation research to preserve the natural heritage of our beautiful state for today’s and future generations. We welcome you to explore a nearby sanctuary, find inspiration, and get involved. Learn how at massaudubon.org. Stony Brook Wildife Sanctuary The value and beauty of nature was on full display in 2020. As the global pandemic closed doors, more people than ever sought refuge outdoors, witnessing firsthand nature’s healing powers. Mass Audubon responded to this extraordinary time with passion, creativity, adaptability, and a singular focus on delivering on our mission, which has never been more important.
    [Show full text]
  • Event Information
    Town of Plymouth, Massachusetts Department of Marine and Environmental Affairs 11 Lincoln Street, Plymouth, MA 02360 | 508-747-1620 10 Acre Public Ponds - Quick Reference Chart Acreage Pond Name Acreage Pond Name 10 Abner Pond 53 Island Pond (South) 31 Bartlett Pond (5) 24 King's Pond 20 Big Rocky Pond 81 Little Herring Pond (5)(6) 148 Big Sandy Pond (4)(6) 37 Little Island Pond 279 Billington Sea (4)(6) 50 Little Long Pond (5)(6) 98 Bloody Pond (2) (4) 10 Little Micaja Pond 74 Boot Pond (2)(6) 45 Little Pond (2) 19 Bump's Pond 12 Little Rocky Pond 18 Charge Pond 34 Little Sandy Pond 14 Clear Pond 66 Little South Pond (6) 50 College Pond (6) 224 Long Pond (3)(6) 25 Cook's Pond 20 Lout Pond 45 Curlew Pond 25 Micaja Pond 91 East Head Reservoir 26 Morey's Pond 27 Fearing Pond 10 Morton Pond 140 Federal Pond 22 New Long Pond 67 Fresh Pond 62 Pinewood Lake 51 Gallow's Pond 22 Rocky Pond 419 Great Herring Pond (4)(6) 48 Russell Mill Pond (5) 84 Great Island Pond (3) (4) 20 Shallow Pond 290 Great South Pond (4) 14 Ship Pond (6) 29 Gunner's Exchange Pond (6) 20 South Triangle Pond 229 Halfway Pond (4)(6) 15 Three-Cornered Pond 30 Hedge's Pond 91 West Ponds (4) 22 Hoyt Pond 37 White's Pond 12 Indian Brook Reservoir 26 Widgeon Pond 14 Island Pond (North) (1) Highlighted ponds are 30 acres or less – Prohibited to internal combustion engines.
    [Show full text]