DOCSLIB.ORG

Peak-Flow Frequency Estimates Based on Data Through Water Year 2001 for Selected Streamflow-Gaging Stations in South Dakota

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Peak-Flow Frequency Estimates Based on Data Through Water Year 2001 for Selected Streamflow-Gaging Stations in South Dakota Prepared in cooperation with the South Dakota Department of Transportation Peak-Flow Frequency Estimates Based on Data through Water Year 2001 for Selected Streamflow-Gaging Stations in South Dakota Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5104 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover photographs: Upper left: U.S. Geological Survey hydrologic technician measures the flow of the Cheyenne River near Plainview (station 06438500) during flood conditions in 1997. Photograph by U.S. Geological Survey. Upper right: James River near Redfield (station 06475000) during flood conditions in 1997. Photograph by U.S. Geological Survey. Bottom: Cars were stacked by the force of water as it pushed through Rapid City leaving the banks of Rapid Creek during the 1972 flood. Photograph courtesy of the Rapid City Journal. Peak-Flow Frequency Estimates Based on Data through Water Year 2001 for Selected Streamflow-Gaging Stations in South Dakota By Steven K. Sando, Daniel G. Driscoll, and Charles Parrett Prepared in cooperation with the South Dakota Department of Transportation Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5104 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1–888–ASK–USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1–888–ASK–USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Sando, S.K., Driscoll, D.G., and Parrett, Charles, 2008, Peak-flow frequency estimates based on data through water year 2001 for selected streamflow-gaging stations in South Dakota: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5104, 367 p. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................2 Peak-Flow Frequency Estimates .................................................................................................................2 Hydrogeologic Considerations Regarding Peak-Flow Frequency Estimates .............................2 Procedures for Frequency Analyses ...............................................................................................11 General Procedures for Fitting the Log-Pearson Type III Probability Distribution .........11 Procedures for Skew Coefficient and Low Outliers .............................................................12 Procedures for Gaging Stations Affected by Regulation ....................................................13 Record-Extension Procedures ................................................................................................14 Historical Adjustment Procedures ..........................................................................................21 Procedures for Gaging Stations in the Black Hills Region .................................................23 Characteristics of Gaging Stations and Frequency Analyses by Major River Basin ..............28 Red River of the North and Minnesota River Basins ...........................................................28 Minor Tributaries to Missouri River ........................................................................................31 Grand River .................................................................................................................................31 Moreau River ..............................................................................................................................32 Cheyenne River ..........................................................................................................................32 Cheyenne River and Belle Fourche River Main Stems ...............................................32 Cheyenne and Belle Fourche River Tributaries in the Black Hills Region ...............33 Cheyenne River Tributaries Downstream from the Black Hills Region....................36 Bad River .....................................................................................................................................36 White River..................................................................................................................................36 James River ................................................................................................................................37 Vermillion River ..........................................................................................................................38 Big Sioux River ...........................................................................................................................38 Summary........................................................................................................................................................39 References ....................................................................................................................................................41 Appendix 1. Additional data ......................................................................................................................43 Appendix 2. Graphs ....................................................................................................................................95 Figures 1–2. Maps showing: 1. Locations of selected streamflow-gaging stations in South Dakota ..........................3 2. Main physiographic divisions of South Dakota ..............................................................4 3–4. Graphs showing: 3. Relations among annual precipitation and peak-flow characteristics for short- and long-term periods for selected sites in eastern South Dakota .................7 4. Peak-flow frequency information for three long-term stations in eastern South Dakota based on data for three different time periods ......................................8 iv 5–6. Maps showing: 5. Generalized surficial geology of South Dakota ..............................................................9 6. Hydrogeologic settings for the Black Hills region........................................................10 7–11. Graphs showing: 7. Peak-flow frequency information for Firesteel Creek near Mount Vernon (06477500) illustrating effects of low-outlier and skew adjustments on frequency curve fits ..........................................................................................................13 8. Peak-flow frequency information for normalized high-outlier peak flows of the Black Hills regional mixed-population analysis ................................................26 9. Peak-flow frequency information for (A) Battle Creek near Keystone (06404000) and (B) Grace Coolidge Creek near Game Lodge near Custer (06404998) illustrating application of the Black Hills regional mixed- population analysis ............................................................................................................27 10. Peak-flow frequency information illustrating influences of the loss-zone hydrogeologic setting .......................................................................................................35 11.1–11.272 Appendix 2. Graphs showing peak-flow information for stations: 11.1 05050000, Bois de Sioux River near White Rock, SD .................................................96 11.2 05051650, La Belle Creek near Veblen, SD ..................................................................97 11.3 05289950, Little Minnesota River tributary at Sisseton, SD ......................................98 11.4 05289985, Big Coulee Creek near Peever, SD .............................................................99 11.5 05290000, Little Minnesota River near Peever, SD ...................................................100 11.6 05290300, North Fork Whetstone River tributary near Wilmot, SD ........................101 11.7 05291000, Whetstone River near Big Stone City, SD ................................................102 11.8 05292000, Minnesota River at Ortonville, MN ...........................................................103 11.9 05292600, North Fork Yellow Bank River tributary near Stockholm, SD ...............104 11.10 05292704, North Fork Yellow Bank River near Odessa, MN ..................................105 11.11 05299700, Cobb Creek near Gary, SD ........................................................................106 11.12 06334500, Little Missouri River at Camp Crook, SD ................................................107 11.13 06354845, Spring Creek tributary near Greenway, SD ...........................................108 11.14 06354860, Spring Creek near Herreid, SD ................................................................109 11.15 06354882, Oak Creek near Wakpala, SD ..................................................................110 11.16 06355400, North Fork Grand
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fall 06.Pub (Read-Only)
    WYOMING WATER DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Fall 2006 Water News Framework Water Plan Update ment Office also gave a One of the topics Progress on the presentation at the 50% that will be addressed in the Framework Water Plan was Aspen Alley progress meeting. In his next round of basin planning reported at the 50% progress presentation, it was stated is groundwater. WWC’s meeting on July 11 in Cas- that the Water Development team is responsible for mak- per. Progress meetings have Office will be seeking fund- ing recommendations on been scheduled for 5%, 50% ing to update two basins this how groundwater should be Inside this issue: and 90% project completion. fall. Mr. Schroeder will be updated. In recent years the Representatives from each responsible for making the drought has highlighted the Framework Water Plan 1 Basin Advisory Group (BAG) recommendation in October need for better groundwater Update/Platte River attended the meetings to regarding which two basin data. This information will Basin Plan is Com- discuss basin issues and to plans should be updated be used to help protect and pleted relay information from the first. Several factors will be manage one of Wyoming’s Framework consultant back considered, including the most valuable resources. News from the WWDC 2 to their groups. The BAGs following: A major task the News from Water Re- 2 learned that each basin is unique but many issues iden- • The length of time since WWC team will be complet- sources Data System/ the last plan was written; ing soon is the BAG survey. State Climate Office tified by the seven basins are A survey will be e-mailed to similar.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of South Dakota
    MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, NO. 119 Fishes of South Dakota REEVE M. BAILEY AND MARVIN 0. ALLUM South Dakota State College ANN ARBOR MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN JUNE 5, 1962 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY 01; MICHIGAN The publications of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, consist of two series-the Occasional Papers and the Miscellaneous Publications. Both series were founded by Dr. Bryant Walker, Mr. Bradshaw H. Swales, and Dr. W. W. Newcomb. The Occasional Papers, publication of which was begun in 1913, serve as a medium for original studies based principally upon the collections in the Museum. They are issued separately. When a sufficient number of pages has been printed to make a volume, a title page, table of contents, and an index are supplied to libraries and indi- viduals on the mailing list for the series. The Miscellaneous Publications, which include papers on field and museum tech- niques, monographic studies, and other contributions not within the scope of the Occasional Papers, are published separately. It is not intended that they be grouped into volumes. Each number has a title page and, when necessary, a table of contents. A conlplete list of publications on Birds, Fishes, Insects, Mammals, Mollusks, and Reptiles and Amphibians is available. Address inquiries to the Director, Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, Michigan No. 13. Studies of the fishes of the order Cyprinodontes. By CARL L. HUBBS. (1924) 23 pp., 4 pls. ............................................. No. 15. A check-list of the fishes of the Great Lakes and tributary waters, with nomenclatorial notes and analytical keys.
    [Show full text]
  • Belle Fourche River Escherichia Coli Total Maximum Daily Load February 2012
    ESCHERICHIA COLI BACTERIA TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) FOR THE BELLE FOURCHE RIVER, SEGMENT 1, BUTTE COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources Water Resources Assistance Program March, 20122 Belle Fourche River Escherichia coli Total Maximum Daily Load February 2012 Total Maximum Daily Load Summary Waterbody Type: Stream 303(d) Listing Parameter: Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria Designated Uses: Warmwater permanent fish life propagation waters, immersion recreation waters, fish and wildlife propagation, recreation, and stock watering, and irrigation water Size of Impaired Waterbody: Approximately 64.2 km in length Size of Watershed: 24,348 acres Indicator(s): Concentrations of E. coli bacteria Analytical Approach: Load Duration Curve Location: Hydrologic Unit Codes (12-digit HUC): 101202020109 101202020201 Goal: Meet applicable water quality standards for fecal coliform bacteria Target (Water Quality Standards): Maximum daily concentration of ≤ 400 cfu/100mL and a geometric mean of 5 samples over a 30 day period ≤ 200 cfu/100mL. These criteria apply from May 1st through September 30th. Reach Number: SD-BF-R-BELLE_FOURCHE_01 Load Allocations based on Geometric Mean: High Flow Zone WLA (cfu/day): 0 High Flow Zone LA (cfu/day): 6.04E+15 High Flow Zone MOS (cfu/day): 4.47E+11 High Flow Zone TMDL (cfu/day): 6.04E+15 2 South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources Belle Fourche River Escherichia coli Total Maximum Daily Load February 2012 Table of Contents Total Maximum Daily Load
    [Show full text]
  • Il[Irlllii~Lliilllmlilrliilr
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE LIBRARY LI~~~Jm'llllll~~~il[irlllii~lliilllmlilrliilas part of an ongoingr digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 3 0307 00062 5502 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Division of Water Quality Municipal Section WASTEWATER DISPOSAL FACILITIES INVENTORY July 1, 1991 Summary Number Population Total State Population (1990) 4,375,099 Municipalities in the State 855 3,396,371 Municipalities with Sewer Systems 661 3,305,749 Municipalities without Sewer System 194 90,622 Municipalities having a Sewer System 2 413 without Treatment Municipalities which have only Primary 4 541 treatment (4 plants) Municipalities which have a Maximum of 502 2,684,724 Secondary Treatment (403 plants) Municipalities which have Tertiary 153 620,071 Treatment (129 plants) Municipalities having a Sewer System 659 3,305,336 with Treatment Works (536 plants) 1 Table of Contents Tables Pages 1. Municipal and Sanitary District Wastewater Treatment Works 2. Unincorporated Communities Having Sewer Systems and Wastewater Treatment Works 3. Wastewater Disposal Facilities at State Institutions 4. Wastewater Disposal Facilities at Sanatoriums and Nursing Homes 5. Wastewater Disposal Facilities at Federal Installations 6. Miscellaneous Wastewater Treatment Works 7. Facilities Operated by Sanitary Districts 8. Municipal Industrial Waste Treatment Works 9. Wastewater Disposal Facilities Operated by Indian Councils 10. Wastewater Treatment Facilities with Tertiary Treatment 11. Wastewater Treatment Facilities Completed in 1990 and 1991 12. Wastewater Treatment Facilities Under Construction 13. Municipalities Having Sewer Systems Without Treatment Works Listed Alphabetically 14. Municipalities Without Sewer Systems - Listed Alphabetically 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of the Hills
    From Broadus, - Little Bighorn From Buffalo, SD Belle Fourche Reservoir From Bowman, ND From Faith, SD Z Rocky Point Devils Tower Battlefield and Alzada, MT and Medora, ND State Rec. Area Orman Dam and Dickinson, ND and Lemmon, SD National Monument Belle Fourche River 212 J 85 212 From Devils Tower Tri-State Museum NEWELL and Hulett, Wyo 22 BLACK ? Center of the Nation 212 NISLAND 24 34 Monument 10 Belle Fourche ALADDIN McNenny River 543 Fish Hatchery BELLE FOURCHE Mirror Lake EL3021 VALE HILLS 111 10 20 21 34 BEULAH 17 & BADLANDS 90 19 ? 2 85 Spearfish Rec & ST. ONGE 14 8 Aquatic Center 79 205 10 18 D.C. Booth Historic ofSouth Dakota 10 12 19 Nat’l Fish Hatchery & Northeastern Wyoming ? 14 17 SPEARFISH J 23 3 EL3645 90 Bear Butte 863 WHITEWOOD Bear Butte State Park 34 MAP LEGEND Crow Peak EL3654 Lake From Devils Tower, Wyo Tower, From Devils Termeshere Gallery & Museum Tatanka Story of ©2018 by BH&B 134 14A High Plains Western the Bison Computer generated by BH&B Citadel 30 Bear Butte Creek ? SUNDANCE 130 Spearfish Heritage Center Boulder Canyon 112 EL4744 Rock Peak 85 14 STURGIS Interchange Exit Number Byway Golf Club at EL3421 14 U.S. Hwy. Marker 214 195 Broken Boot 8 6 J Bridal Apple Springs 44 Scenic Veil Falls Gold Mine State Hwy. Marker Mt. Theo DEADWOOD ? Iron Creek Black Hills Roosevelt 14A Canyon 32 Ft. Meade Old Ft. Meade 21 Forest Service Road EL4537 Grand Canyon Lake Mining Museum Canyon Little 133 12 Moskee Hwy. 134 Boulder 18 Crow Peak Museum 4 County Road Adventures at Sturgis Motorcycle 141 Cement Ridge Museum 170 34 ? Visitor Information Lookout Spearfish 19 CENTRAL CITY Days of 76 Museum Canyon Lodge Spearfish ? ? & Hall of Fame Bikers 7 Mileage Between Stars 222 Spearfish Historic LEAD 103 Falls Homestake EL5203 Adams Museum & House 170 Black Hills Scenic SAVOY PLUMA 79 37 Byway Paved Highway 807 Opera House 3 National Dwd Mini-Golf & Arcade 18 Cemetery Multi-Lane Divided Hwy.
    [Show full text]
  • 7050.0470 CLASSIFICATIONS for SURFACE WATERS in MAJOR DRAINAGE BASINS. Subpart 1. Lake Superior Basin. the Water Use Classifica
    1 REVISOR 7050.0470 7050.0470 CLASSIFICATIONS FOR SURFACE WATERS IN MAJOR DRAINAGE BASINS. Subpart 1. Lake Superior basin. The water use classifications for the listed waters in the Lake Superior basin are as identified in items A to D. See parts 7050.0425 and 7050.0430 for the classifications of waters not listed. A. Streams: (1) Ahlenius Creek, (T.53, R.14, S.9, 10): 1B, 2A, 3B; (2) Amenda Creek, (T.59, R.5, S.19, 20, 29, 30, 31; T.59, R.6, S.36): 1B, 2A, 3B; (3) Amity Creek, (T.50, R.13, S.5, 6; T.50, R.14, S.1; T.51, R.13, S.31, 32; T.51, R.14, S.26, 27, 28, 35, 36): 1B, 2A, 3B; (4) Amity Creek, East Branch (T.51, R.13, S.30, 31; T.51, R.14, S.13, 14, 15, 22, 24, 25, 36): 1B, 2A, 3B; (5) Anderson Creek, Carlton County, (T.46, R.17, S.11, 14, 15, 22, 26, 27): 1B, 2A, 3B; (6) Anderson Creek, St. Louis County, (T.49, R.15, S.16, 17, 18; T.49, R.16, S.12, 13): 1B, 2A, 3B; (7) Artichoke Creek, (T.52, R.17, S.7, 17, 18): 1B, 2A, 3B; (8) Assinika Creek, (T.63, R.1E, S.1; T.63, R.2E, S.7, 8, 16, 17, 21; T.64, R.1E, S.36; T.64, R.2E, S.31): 1B, 2A, 3B; (9) Bally Creek, (T.61, R.1W, S.3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11; T.61, R.2W, S.12): 1B, 2A, 3B; (10) Baptism River, East Branch, (T.57, R.6, S.6; T.57, R.7, S.1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 20; T.58, R.6, S.30, 31; T.58, R.7, S.13, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 36; T.58, R.8, S.22, 23, 24, 25, 26): 1B, 2A, 3B; (11) Baptism River, Main Branch, (T.56, R.7, S.3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 14, 15; T.57, R.7, S.20, 27, 28, 29, 33, 34): 1B, 2A, 3B; (12) Baptism River, West Branch, (T.57, R.7, S.7, 17, 18, 20; T.57, R.8, S.1, 2, 12; T.58, R.8, S.2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 28, 33, 34, 35, 36; T.59, R.8, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Belle Fourche River
    Section 319 NONPOINT SOURCE PROGRAM SUCCESS STORY WatershedSouth Partnership Restores River Dakota Waterbodies Improved Stream entrenchment and bank failure caused excess sediment to enter the Belle Fourche River, prompting South Dakota to add two segments of the river to its 2002 Clean Water Act (CWA) section 303(d) list of impaired waters for elevated total suspended solids (TSS). The Belle Fourche River Watershed Partnership led efforts to restore riparian grazing areas and reduce the volume of unused irriga- tion water returning to the river, both of which reduced the amount of sediment entering the river. Water quality has improved and standards are now being met. South Dakota removed both segments of the Belle Fourche River from the 2008 CWA section 303(d) list for TSS. Problem The South Dakota portion of the Belle Fourche River watershed (Figure 1) drains parts of Butte, Lawrence and Meade counties. The river flows eastward into the Cheyenne River and ultimately to the Missouri River. Land use in the watershed is primarily livestock grazing with some cropland and a few urban and suburban areas. Data show that elevated levels of sediment in the river were causing TSS levels to exceed the water quality standard of 158 milligrams per liter (mg/L) TSS daily maximum. Therefore, South Dakota added two seg- ments of the Belle Fourche River—a 23-mile-long segment from near Fruitdale to Whitewood Creek and a 17-mile-long segment from Whitewood Creek to Willow Creek—to the 2002 CWA section 303(d) Figure 1. The Belle Fourche River watershed drains list of impaired waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Sioux River Watershed Strategic Plan
    BIG SIOUX RIVER WATERSHED STRATEGIC PLAN In Cooperation With: South Dakota Conservation Districts South Dakota Association of Conservation Districts South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Date: June 2016 Prepared by: TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 9 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 12 1.1 Project Background and Scope .................................................................... 12 1.2 Climate ....................................................................................................... 13 1.3 Population................................................................................................... 13 1.4 Geography .................................................................................................. 16 1.5 Soils ........................................................................................................... 18 1.6 Land Use .................................................................................................... 22 1.7 Water Resources ......................................................................................... 22 1.8 Big Sioux River Watershed Improvement History ....................................... 23 1.8.1 Upper Big Sioux River Watershed ........................................................ 26 1.8.2 North-Central
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NFS Form 10-900 . / OMB No. 1024-uuiB (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individud See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Register Bulletin 16A) . Complete each item by marking "x" in the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, yjfljrtii -TT7A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and arcV*u 61 significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic names Entrance Road________________________________________________ other names/site number Entrance Drive; Entrance Highway; NPS Route #1; State Route 110; HS-R10; #48CK1645_________________________________________ 2. Location street & number Devils Tower National Monument___ not for publication ___ city or town Devils Tower____________________ vicinity ___ state Wyoming code WY county Crook code Oil zip code 82714-0010 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination _ _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _X_ meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant __ nationally __ statewide _X_ locally.
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Water Fund Expenditure Report
    z c Clean Water Fund Expenditure Report January 2012 Legislative Charge Minn. Statutes § 114d.50, subd. 4c A state agency or other recipient of a direct appropriation from the Clean Water Fund must compile and submit all information for proposed and funded projects or programs, including the proposed measurable outcomes and all other items required under Section 3.303, subdivision 10, to the Legislative Coordinating Commission as soon as practicable or by January 15 of the applicable fiscal year, whichever comes first. Authors Estimated cost of preparing this report (as Myrna Halbach required by Minn. Stat. § 3.197) Alexis Donath Total staff time: 55 hrs. $1,388 Kurt Soular Production/duplication $63 Total $1,451 Contributors / Acknowledgements Linda Carroll The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs Jennifer Crea by using the Internet to distribute reports and information to wider audience. Visit our web site Editing and Graphic Design for more information. Paul Andre MPCA reports are printed on 100% post-consumer Scott Andre recycled content paper manufactured without Jerome Davis chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Beth Tegdesch Cover photo: Scott Andre Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | www.pca.state.mn.us | 651-296-6300 Toll free 800-657-3864 | TTY 651-282-5332 This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us Document number: lrp-f-1sy12 Contents Introduction ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 ^~*~~~^ OMB Na 1024-°018 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property___________________________________________ historic name Butte County Courthouse and Historic Jail Building_____________ other names/site number 2. Location___________________________________________ street & number 839 - 5th Avenue_________________ not for publication N/A city or town Belle Fourche___________________________ vicinity state South Dakota code SD County Butte_____ code 019 zip code 57717 3. State/Federal Agency Certification_________________________________ As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _*_ meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant __ nationally _ statewide X locally.
    [Show full text]
  • Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, Dod § 222.5
    Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 222.5 transmitted through the Division Engi- seismic instrumentation at a Corps neer for review and to HQDA (DAEN- project, the Division will send a report CWE) WASH DC 20314 for review and of all pertinent instrumentation data approval. For structures incurring no to the Waterways Experiment Station, damage a simple statement to this ef- ATTN: WESGH, P.O. Box 631, Vicks- fect will be all that is required in the burg, Mississippi 39180. The report on report, unless seismic instrumentation each project should include a complete at the project is activated. (See para- description of the locations and types graph (h)(4) of this section.) of instruments and a copy of the in- (g) Training. The dam safety training strumental records from each of the program covered by paragraph 6 of ER strong motion machines activated. (Ex- 1130–2–419 should include post-earth- empt from requirements control under quake inspections and the types of paragraph 7–2v, AR 335–15). damage operations personnel should (5) The Engineering Divisions of the look for. Division offices will select structures (h) Responsibilities. (1) The Engineer- for special instrumentation for earth- ing Divisions of the District offices will quake effects, and will review and mon- formulate the inspection program, con- itor the data collection, processing, duct the post-earthquake inspections, evaluating, and inspecting activities. process and analyze the data of instru- They will also be specifically respon- mental and other observations, evalu- sible for promptly informing HQDA ate the resulting condition of the structures, and prepare the inspection (DAEN-CWE) WASH DC 20314, when reports.
    [Show full text]