Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, Dod § 222.5

Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 222.5

transmitted through the Division Engi- seismic instrumentation at a Corps neer for review and to HQDA (DAEN- project, the Division will send a report CWE) WASH DC 20314 for review and of all pertinent instrumentation data approval. For structures incurring no to the Waterways Experiment Station, damage a simple statement to this ef- ATTN: WESGH, P.O. Box 631, Vicks- fect will be all that is required in the burg, Mississippi 39180. The report on report, unless seismic instrumentation each project should include a complete at the project is activated. (See para- description of the locations and types graph (h)(4) of this section.) of instruments and a copy of the in- (g) Training. The dam safety training strumental records from each of the program covered by paragraph 6 of ER strong motion machines activated. (Ex- 1130–2–419 should include post-earth- empt from requirements control under quake inspections and the types of paragraph 7–2v, AR 335–15). damage operations personnel should (5) The Engineering Divisions of the look for. Division offices will select structures (h) Responsibilities. (1) The Engineer- for special instrumentation for earth- ing Divisions of the District offices will quake effects, and will review and mon- formulate the inspection program, con- itor the data collection, processing, duct the post-earthquake inspections, evaluating, and inspecting activities. process and analyze the data of instru- They will also be specifically respon- mental and other observations, evalu- sible for promptly informing HQDA ate the resulting condition of the structures, and prepare the inspection (DAEN-CWE) WASH DC 20314, when reports. The Engineering division is evaluation of the condition of the also responsible for planning special in- structure or analyses of the instrumen- strumentation felt necessary in se- tation data indicate the stability of a lected structures under this program. structure is questionable. (Exempt for Engineering Division is responsible for requirements control under paragraph providing the training discussed in 7–2o, AR 335–15.) paragraph (g) of this section. (6) Division Engineers are responsible (2) The Construction Divisions of the for issuing any supplementary regula- District offices will be responsible for tions necessary to adapt the policies the installation of the earthquake in- and instructions herein to the specific strumentation devices and for data col- conditions within their Division. lection if an earthquake occurs during (i) Funding. Funding for the evalua- the construction period. tion and inspection program will be (3) The Operations Division of the under the Appropriation 96X3123, Oper- District offices will be responsible for ations and Maintenance, General. the immediate assessment of earth- Funds required for the inspections, in- quake damage and notifying the Chief, cluding Travel and Per Diem costs in- Engineering Division as discussed in curred by personnel of the Division of- paragraphs (f)(1) and (2). The Oper- fice or the Office, Chief of Engineers, ations Division will also be responsible will be from allocations made to the for earthquake data collection after various projects for the fiscal year in the construction period in accordance which the inspection occurs. with the instrumental observation programs, and will assist and participate [44 FR 43469, July 25, 1979. Redesignated at 60 in the post-earthquake inspections. FR 19851, Apr. 21, 1995] (4) The U.S. Geological Survey has the responsibility for servicing and col- § 222.5 Water control management (ER 1110–2–240). lecting all data from strong motion instrumentation at Corps of Engineers (a) Purpose. This regulation pre- dam projects following an earthquake scribes policies and procedures to be occurrence. However, the U.S. Army followed by the U.S. Army Corps of En- Waterways Experiment Station (WES) gineers in carrying out water control is assigned the responsibility for ana- management activities, including es- lyzing and interpreting these earth- tablishment of water control plans for quake data. Whenever a recordable Corps and non-Corps projects, as re- earthquake record is obtained from quired by Federal laws and directives.

223

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00233 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR § 222.5 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–10 Edition)

(b) Applicability. This regulation is carry out regulation of projects in an applicable to all field operating activi- appropriate manner. ties having civil works responsibilities. (2) The term ‘‘reservoir regulation (c) References. Appendix A lists U.S. schedule’’ refers to a compilation of op- Army Corps of Engineers publications erating criteria, guidelines, rule curves and sections of Federal statutes and and specifications that govern basi- regulations that are referenced herein. cally the storage and release functions (d) Authorities—(1) U.S. Army Corps of of a reservoir. In general, schedules in- Engineers projects. Authorities for allo- dicate limiting rates of reservoir re- cation of storage and regulation of leases required during various seasons projects owned and operated by the of the year to meet all functional ob- Corps of Engineers are contained in jectives of the particular project, act- legislative authorization acts and ref- ing separately or in combination with erenced project documents. These pub- other projects in a system. Schedules lic laws and project documents usually are usually expressed in the form of contain provisions for development of graphs and tabulations, supplemented water control plans, and appropriate by concise specifications. revisions thereto, under the discre- (f) General policies. (1) Water control tionary authority of the Chief of Engi- plans will be developed for reservoirs, neers. Some modifications in project locks and dams, reregulation and operation are permitted under congres- major control structures and inter- sional enactments subsequent to origi- related systems to comform with ob- nal project authorization. Questions jectives and specific provisions of au- that require interpretations of author- thorizing legislation and applicable izations affecting regulation of specific Corps of Engineers reports. They will reservoirs will be referred to CDR include any applicable authorities es- USACE (DAEN-CWE-HW), WASH DC tablished after project construction. 20314, with appropriate background in- The water control plans will be pre- formation and analysis, for resolution. pared giving appropriate consideration (2) Non-Corps projects. The Corps of to all applicable Congressional Acts re- Engineers is responsible for prescribing lating to operation of Federal facili- flood control and navigation regula- ties, i.e., Fish and Wildlife Coordina- tions for certain reservoir projects con- tion Act (Pub. L. 85–624), Federal Water structed or operated by other Federal, Project Recreation Act-Uniform Poli- non-Federal or private agencies. There cies (Pub. L. 89–72), National Environ- are several classes of such projects: mental Policy Act of 1969 (Pub. L. 91– Those authorized by special acts of 190), and Clean Water Act of 1977 (Pub. Congress; those for which licenses L. 95–217). Thorough analysis and test- issued by the Federal Energy Regu- ing studies will be made as necessary latory Commission (formerly Federal to establish the optimum water control Power Commission) provide that oper- plans possible within prevailing con- ation shall be in accordance with in- straints. structions of the Secretary of the (2) Necessary actions will be taken to Army; those covered by agreements be- keep approved water control plans up- tween the operating agency and the to-date. For this purpose, plans will be Corps of Engineers; and those that fall subject to continuing and progressive under the terms of general legislative study by personnel in field offices of and administrative provisions. These the Corps of Engineers. These per- authorities, of illustrative examples, sonnel will be professionally qualified are described briefly in Appendix B. in technical areas involved and famil- (e) Terminology: Water control plans iar with comprehensive project objec- and reservoir regulation schedules. (1) tives and other factors affecting water Water control plans include coordi- control. Organizational requirements nated regulation schedules for project/ for water control management are fur- system regulation and such additional ther discussed in ER 1110–2–1400. provisions as may be required to col- (3) Water control plans developed for lect, analyze and disseminate basic specific projects and reservoir systems data, prepare detailed operating in- will be clearly documented in appro- structions, assure project safety and priate water control manuals. These

224

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00234 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 222.5

manuals will be prepared to meet ini- the general public. Care will be exer- tial requirements when storage in the cised in the development of reservoir reservoir begins. They will be revised regulation schedules to assure that as necessary to conform with changing controlled releases minimize project requirements resulting from develop- impacts and do not jeopardize the safe- ments in the project area and down- ty of persons engaged in activities stream, improvements in technology, downstream of the facility. Water con- new legislation and other relevant fac- trol plans will include provisions for tors, provided such revisions comply issuing adequate warnings or otherwise with existing Federal regulations and alerting all affected interests to pos- established Corps of Engineers policy. sible hazards from project regulation (4) Development and execution of activities. water control plans will include appro- (8) In carrying out water control ac- priate consideration for efficient water tivities, Corps of Engineers personnel management in conformance with the must recognize and observe the legal emphasis on water conservation as a responsibility of the National Weather national priority. The objectives of ef- Service (NWS), National Oceanic and ficient water control management are Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), to produce beneficial water savings and for issuing weather forecasts and flood improvements in the availability and warnings, including river discharges quality of water resulting from project and stages. River forecasts prepared by regulation/operation. Balanced re- the Corps of Engineers in the execution source use through improved regula- of its responsibilities should not be re- tion should be developed to conserve as leased to the general public, unless the much water as possible and maximize NWS is willing to make the release or all project functions consistent with agrees to such dissemination. However, project/system management. Contin- release to interested parties of factual uous examination should be made of information on current storms or river regulation schedules, possible need for conditions and properly quoted NWS storage reallocation (within existing forecasts is permissible. District offices authority and constraints) and to iden- are encouraged to provide assistance to tify needed changes in normal regula- communities and individuals regarding tion. Emphasis should be placed on the impact of forecasted floods. Typ- evaluating conditions that could re- ical advice would be to provide approx- quire deviation from normal release imate water surface elevations at loca- schedules as part of drought contin- tions upstream and downstream of the gency plans (ER 1110–2–1941). NWS forecasting stream gages. An- (5) Adequate provisions for collec- nouncement of anticipated changes in tion, analysis and dissemination of reservoir release rates as far in ad- basic data, the formulation of specific vance as possible to the general public project regulation directives, and the is the responsibility of Corps of Engi- performance of project regulation will neers water control managers for be established at field level. projects under their jurisdiction. (6) Appropriate provisions will be (9) Water control plans will be devel- made for monitoring project oper- oped in concert with all basin interests ations, formulating advisories to high- which are or could be impacted by or er authorities, and disseminating infor- have an influence on project regula- mation to others concerned. These ac- tion. Close coordination will be main- tions are required to facilitate proper tained with all appropriate inter- regulation of systems and to keep the national, Federal, State, regional and public fully informed regarding all per- local agencies in the development and tinent water control matters. execution of water control plans. Effec- (7) In development and execution of tive public information programs will water control plans, appropriate atten- be developed and maintained so as to tion will be given to project safety in inform and educate the public regard- accordance with ER 1130–2–417 and ER ing Corps of Engineers water control 1130–2–419 so as to insure that all water management activities. impounding structures are operated for (10) Fiscal year budget requests for the safety of users of the facilities and water control management activities

225

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00235 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR § 222.5 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–10 Edition)

will be prepared and submitted to the (A) Conditions that require public in- Office of the Chief of Engineers in ac- volvement and public meetings in- cordance with requirements estab- clude: Development of a new water con- lished in Engineer Circular on Annual trol manual that includes a water con- Budget Requests for Civil Works Ac- trol plan; or revision or update of a tivities. The total annual costs of all water control manual that changes the activities and facilities that support water control plan. the water control functions, (excluding (B) Revisions to water control manu- physical operation of projects, but in- als that are administratively or infor- cluding flood control and navigation mational in nature and that do not regulation of projects subject to 33 change the water control plan do not CFR 208.11) are to be reported. Informa- require public meetings. tion on the Water Control Data Sys- (C) For those conditions described in tems and associated Communications paragraph (g)(2)(i)(A) of this section, Category of the Plant Replacement and Improvement Program will be sub- the Corps will provide information to mitted with the annual budget. Report- the public concerning proposed water ing will be in accordance with the an- control management decisions at least nual Engineer Circular on Civil Works 30 days in advance of a public meeting. Operations and Maintenance, General In so doing, a separate document(s) Program. should be prepared that explains the (g) Responsibilities: US Army Corps of recommended water control plan or Engineers projects—(1) Preparation of change, and provides technical infor- water control plans and manuals. Nor- mation explaining the basis for the rec- mally, district commanders are pri- ommendation. It should include a de- marily responsible for background scription of its impacts (both monetary studies and for developing plans and and nonmonetary) for various pur- manuals required for reservoirs, locks poses, and the comparisons with alter- and dams, reregulation and major con- native plans or changes and their ef- trol structures and interrelated sys- fects. The plan or manual will be pre- tems in their respective district areas. pared only after the public involve- Policies and general guidelines are pre- ment process associated with its devel- scribed by OCE engineer regulations opment or change is complete. while specific requirements to imple- (D) For those conditions described in ment OCE guidance are established by paragraph (g)(2)(i)(A) of this section, the division commanders concerned. the responsible division office will send Master Water Control Manuals for each proposed water control manual to river basins that include more than one the Army Corps of Engineers Head- district are usually prepared by or quarters, Attn: CECW-EH-W for review under direct supervision of division and comments prior to approval by the representatives. Division commanders responsible division office. are responsible for providing such management and technical assistance as (ii) Information availability. The water may be required to assure that plans control manual will be made available and manuals are prepared on a timely for examination by the general public and adequate basis to meet water con- upon request at the appropriate office trol requirements in the division area, of the Corps of Engineers. Public notice and for pertinent coordination among shall be given in the event of occurring districts, divisions, and other appro- or anticipated significant changes in priate entities. reservoir storage or flow releases. The (2) Public involvement and informa- method of conveying this information tion—(i) Public meeting and public in- shall be commensurate with the ur- volvement. The Corps of Engineers will gency of the situation and the lead sponsor public involvement activities, time available. as appropriate, to appraise the general (3) Authority for approval of plans and public of the water control plan. In de- manuals. Division commanders are del- veloping or modifying water control egated authority for approval of water manuals, the following criteria is ap- control plans and manuals, and associ- plicable. ated activities.

226

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00236 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 222.5

(4) OCE role in water control activities. specific regions. Supplemental infor- OCE will establish policies and guide- mation regarding technical methods is lines applicable to all field offices and provided in numerous documents dis- for such actions as are necessary to as- tributed to field offices as ‘‘hydrologic sure a reasonable degree of consistency references.’’ in basic policies and practices in all Di- (4) Special assistance in technical vision areas. Assistance will be pro- studies is available from the Hydro- vided to field offices during emer- logic Engineering Center, Corps of En- gencies and upon special request. gineers, 609 Second Street, Davis, Cali- (5) Methods improvement and staff fornia 95616 and DAEN-CWE-HW. training. Division and district com- (i) Water control manuals for US Army manders are responsible for conducting Corps of Engineers projects. (1) As used appropriate programs for improving herein, the term ‘‘water control man- technical methods applicable to water ual’’ refers to manuals that relate pri- control activities in their respective marily to the functional regulation of areas. Suitable training programs an individual project or system of should be maintained to assure a satis- projects. Although such manuals nor- factory performance capability in mally include background information water control activities. Appropriate concerning physical features of coordination of such programs with projects, they do not prescribe rules or similar activities in other areas will be methods for physical maintenance or accomplished to avoid duplication of care of facilities, which are covered in effort, and to foster desirable exchange other documents. (References 15 and 23, of ideas and developments. Initiative in appendix A.) re-evaluating methods and guidelines (2) Water control manuals prepared previously established in official docu- in substantially the detail and format ments referred to in paragraph (e) of specified in instructions referred to in this section is encouraged where needs paragraph 8 are required for all res- are evident. However, proposals for ervoirs under the supervision of the major deviations from basic concepts, policies and general practices reflected Corps of Engineers, regardless of the in official publications will be sub- purpose or size of the project. Water mitted to CDR USACE (DAEN-CWE) Control manuals are also required for WASH DC 20314 for concurrence or lock and dam, reregulation and major comment before being adopted for sub- control structure projects that are stantial application in actual project physically regulated by the Corps of regulation at field level. Engineers. Where there are several (h) Directives and technical instruction projects in a drainage basin with inter- manuals. (1) Directives issued through related purposes, a ‘‘Master Manual’’ OCE Engineer Regulations will be used shall be prepared. The effects of non- to foster consistency in policies and Corps projects will be considered in ap- basic practices. They will be supple- propriate detail, including an indica- mented as needed by other forms of tion of provisions for interagency co- communication. ordination. (2) Engineering Manuals (EM) and (3) ‘‘Preliminary water control manu- Engineer Technical Letters (ETL) are als,’’ for projects regulated by the issued by OCE to serve as general Corps of Engineers should contain reg- guidelines and technical aids in devel- ulation schedules in sufficient detail to oping water control plans and manuals establish the basic plan of initial for individual projects or systems. project regulation. (3) EM 1110–2–3600 discusses principles (4) As a general rule, preliminary and concepts involved in developing manuals should be superseded by more water control plans. Instructions relat- detailed interim or ‘‘final’’ manuals ing to preparation of ‘‘Water Control within approximately one year after Manuals for speicfic projects’’ are in- the project is placed in operation. cluded. EM 1110–2–3600 should be used (5) Each water control manual will as a general guide to water control ac- contain a section on special regula- tivities. The instructions are suffi- tions to be conducted during emer- ciently flexible to permit adaptation to gency situations, including droughts.

227

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00237 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR § 222.5 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–10 Edition)

Preplanned operations and coordina- navigation purposes in non-Corps tion are essential to effective relief or projects are governed basically by con- assistance. ditions of project authorizations or (6) One copy of all water control other legislative provisions and may manuals and subsequent revisions shall include any or all of the following be forwarded to DAEN-CWE-HW for file types of storage assignments: purposes as soon as practicable after (i) Year-round allocations: Storage completion, preferably within 30 days remains the same all year. from date of approval at the division (ii) Seasonal allocations: Storage level. varies on a fixed seasonal basis. (j) Policies and requirements for pre- (iii) Variable allocations of flood con- paring regulations for non-Corps projects. trol from year to year, depending on (1) Division and district commanders hydrologic parameters, such as snow will develop water control plans as re- cover. quired by section 7 of the 1944 Flood (5) Water control plans should be de- Control Act, the Federal Power Act veloped to attain maximum flood con- and section 9 of Pub. L. 436–83 for all trol or navigation benefits, consistent projects located within their areas, in with other project requirements, from conformance with ER 1110–2–241, 33 the storage space provided for these CFR part 208. That regulation pre- purposes. When reservoir storage ca- scribes the policy and general proce- pacity of the category referred to in dures for regulating reservoir projects paragraph (j)(4)(iii) is utilized for flood capable of regulation for flood control control or navigation, jointly with or navigation, except projects owned other objectives, the hydrologic param- and operated by the Corps of Engi- eters and related rules developed under neers; the International Boundary and provisions of ER 1110–2–241, 33 CFR part Water Commission, United States and 208 should conform as equitably as pos- Mexico; those under the jurisdiction of sible with the multiple-purpose objec- the International Joint Commission, tives established in project authoriza- United States and Canada, and the Co- tions and other pertinent legislation. lumbia River Treaty. ER 1110–2–241, 33 (6) Storage allocations made for flood CFR part 208 permits the promulgation control or navigation purposes in non- of specific regulations for a project in Corps projects are not subject to modi- compliance with the authorizing acts, fications by the Corps of Engineers as a when agreement on acceptable regula- prerequisite for prescribing 33 CFR tions cannot be reached between the 208.11 regulations. However, regula- Corps Engineers and the owners. Ap- tions developed for use of such storage pendix B provides a summary of the should be predicated on a mutual un- Corps of Engineers responsibilities for derstanding between representatives of prescribing regulations for non-Corps the Corps and the operating agency reservoir projects. concerning the conditions of the allo- (2) Water control plans will be devel- cations in order to assure reasonable oped and processed as soon as possible achievement of basic objectives infor applicable projects already com- tended. In the event field representa- pleted and being operated by other en- tives of the Corps of Engineers, and the tities, including projects built by the operating agency are unable to reach Corps of Engineers and turned over to necessary agreements after all reason- others for operation. able possibilities have been explored, (3) In so far as practicable, water con- appropriate background explanations trol plans for non-Corps projects should and recommendations should be sub- be developed in cooperation with own- mitted to DAEN-CWE-HW for considering/operating agencies involved during ation. project planning stages. Thus, ten- (7) The Chief of Engineers is respon- tative agreements on contents, includ- sible for prescribing regulations for use ing pertinent regulation schedules and of flood control or navigation storage diagrams, can be accomplished prior to and/or project operation under the pro- completion of the project. visions of the referenced legislative (4) The magnitude and nature of stor- acts. Accordingly, any regulations es- age allocations for flood control or tablished should designate the division/

228

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00238 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 222.5

district commander who is responsible concerning technical studies and devel- to the Chief of Engineers as the rep- opment of regulations are contained in resentative to issue any special in- ER 1110–2–241, 33 CFR part 208 and EM structions required under the regula- 1110–2–3600. Appendix C of this regulation. However, to the extent prac- tion summarizes steps normally fol- ticable, project regulations should be lowed in developing and processing reg- written to permit operation of the ulations for non-Corps projects. project by the owner without interpre- (l) Water control during project con- tations of the regulations by the des- struction stage. Water control plans dis- ignated representative of the Com- cussed in preceding paragraphs are in- mander during operating periods. tended primarily for application after (8) Responsibility for compliance the dam, spillway and outlet struc- with 33 CFR 208.11 regulations rests tures; major relocations; land acquisi- with the operating agency. The divi- tions, administrative arrangements sion or district commander of the area and other project requirements have in which the project is located will be reached stages that permit relatively kept informed regarding project oper- normal project regulation. With re- ations to verify reasonable conform- spect to non-Corps projects, regula- ance with the regulations. The Chief of tions normally become applicable when Engineers or his designated representa- water control agreements have been tive may authorize or direct deviation signed by the designated signatories, from the established water control plan subject to special provisions in specific when conditions warrant such devi- cases. In some instances, implementa- ation. In the event unapproved devi- tion of regulations has been delayed by ations from the prescribed regulations legal provisions, contract limitations, seem evident, the division or district or other considerations. These delays commander concerned will bring the can result in loss of potential project matter to the attention of the oper- benefits and possible hazards. Accord- ating agency by appropriate means. ingly, it is essential that appropriate If corrective actions are not taken water control and contingency plans be promptly, the operating agency should established for use from the date any be notified of the apparent deviation in storage may accumulate behind a par- writing as a matter of record. Should tially completed dam until the project an impasse arise, in that the project is formally accepted for normal oper- owner or the designated operating enti- ations. Division commanders shall ty persists in noncompliance with reg- make certain that construction-stage ulations prescribed by the Corps of En- regulation plans are established and gineers, the Office of Chief Counsel maintained in a timely and adequate should be advised through normal manner for projects under the super- channels and requested to take nec- vision of the Corps of Engineers. In ad- essary measures to assure compliance. dition, the problems referred to should (9) Regulations should contain infor- be discussed with authorities who are mation regarding the required ex- responsible for non-Corps projects, change of basic data between the rep- with the objective of assuring that resentative of the operating agency such projects operate as safely and ef- and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, fectively as possible during the critical that are pertinent to regulation and construction stage and any period that coordination of interrelated projects in may elapse before regular operating ar- the region. rangements have been established. (10) All 33 CFR 208.11 regulations These special regulation plans should shall contain provisions authorizing include consideration for protection of the operating agency to temporarily construction operations; safety of deviate from the regulations in the downstream interests that might be event that it is necessary for emer- jeopardized by failure of partially com- gency reasons to protect the safety of pleted embankments; requirements for the dam, to avoid health hazards, and minimizing adverse effects on partially to alleviate other critical situations. completed relocations or incomplete (k) Developing and processing regula- land acquisition; and the need for ob- tions for non-Corps projects. Guidelines taining benefits from project storage

229

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00239 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR § 222.5 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–10 Edition)

that can be safely achieved during the form as shown in the sample tabulation construction and early operation pe- in Appendix D. riod. (5) Annual division water quality re- (m) Advisories to OCE regarding water ports (RCS DAEN-CWE–15). By Execu- control activities—(1) General. Division tive Order 12088, the President ordered commanders will keep the Chief of En- the head of each Executive Agency to gineers currently informed of any un- be responsible for ensuring that all usual problems or activities associated necessary actions are taken for preven- with water control that impact on his tion, control, and abatement of envi- responsibilities. ronmental pollution with respect to (2) Annual division water control man- Federal facilities and activities under agement report (RCS DAEN-CWE–16(R1)). control of the agency. General guid- Division commanders will submit an ance is provided in references 24 and 25, annual report on water control man- Appendix A, for carrying out this agen- agement activities within their divi- cy’s responsibility. Annual division sion. The annual report will be sub- water quality reports are required by mitted to (DAEN-CWE-HW) by 1 Feb- reference 24, Appendix A. The report is ruary each year and cover significant submitted in two parts. The first part activities of the previous water year addresses the division Water quality and a description of activities to be ac- management plan while the second complished for the current year. Fund- part presents specific project informa- ing information for water control ac- tion. A major objective of this report is tivities will be provided in the letter of transmittal for in-house use only. The to summarize information pertinent to primary objective of this summary is water quality aspects of overall water to keep the Chief of Engineers in- management responsibilities. The an- formed regarding overall water man- nual division water quality report may agement activities Corps-wide, thus be submitted along with the annual re- providing a basis to carry out OCE report on water control management ac- sponsibilities set forth in paragraph tivities discussed in paragraph 13b (g)(4) of this section. above. (3) Status of water control manuals. A (6) Master plans for water control data brief discussion shall be prepared annu- systems (RCS DAEN-CWE–21). (i) A ally by each division commander, as a water control data system is all of the separate section of the annual report equipment within a division which is on water control management activi- used to acquire, process, display and ties discussed in paragraph (m)(2) of distribute information for real-time this section listing all projects cur- project regulation and associated inter- rently in operation in his area, or ex- agency coordination. A subsystem is pected to begin operation within one- all equipment as defined previously year, with a designation of the status within a district. A network is all of water control manuals. The report equipment as defined previously which should also list projects for which the is used to regulate a single project or a Corps of Engineers is responsible for group of projects which must be regu- prescribing regulations, as defined in lated interdependently. ER 1110–2–241, 33 CFR part 208. (ii) Master plans for water control (4) Monthly water control charts (RCS data systems and significant revisions DAEN-CWE–6 (R1)). A monthly record thereto will be prepared by division of reservoirs/lakes operated by the water control managers and submitted Corps of Engineers and other agencies, to DAEN-CWE-HW by 1 February each in accordance with 33 CFR 208.11, will year for review and approval of engi- be promptly prepared and maintained neering aspects. Engineering approval by district/division commanders in a does not constitute funding approval. form readily available for transmittal After engineering approval is obtained, to the Chief of Engineers, or others, equipment in the master plan is eligi- upon request. Record data may be pre- ble for consideration in the funding pared in either graphical form as shown in EM 1110–2–3600, or tabular processes described in ER 1125–2–301

230

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00240 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 222.5

and engineering circulars on the an- O&M General; Flood Control, MR&T, nual budget request for civil works ac- and Construction, General. Funding for tivities. Master plans will be main- water control equipment that serves tained current and will: two or more projects will be from Plant (A) Outline the system performance Revolving Fund in accordance with ER requirements, including those resulting 1125–2–301. District and division water from any expected expansions of Corps control managers will coordinate plant missions. revolving fund requests with their re- (B) Describe the extent to which ex- spective Plant Replacement and Im- isting facilities fulfill performance re- provement Program (PRIP) representa- quirements. tives following guidance provided in (C) Describe alternative approaches ER 1125–2–301. Budget funding requests which will upgrade the system to meet under the proper appropriation title the requirements not fulfilled by exist- should be submitted only if the equip- ing facilities, or are more cost effective ment is identified in an approved mas- then the existing system. ter plan. (D) Justify and recommend a system (vii) Justification for the Automatic considering timeliness, reliability, eco- Data Processing Equipment (ADPE) as- nomics and other factors deemed im- pects of water control data systems portant. must conform to AR 18–1, Appendix I or (E) Delineate system scope, imple- J as required. The ‘‘Funding for ADPE’’ mentation schedules, proposed annual paragraph in Appendixes I and J must capital expenditures by district, total cite the source of funds and reference costs, and sources of funding. relevant information in the approved (iii) Modified master plans should be master plan and detailed plan. submitted to DAEN-CWE-HW by 1 Feb- (viii) Division water control man- ruary, whenever revisions are required, agers will submit annual letter sum- to include equipment not previously maries of the status of their respective approved or changes in scope or ap- water control systems and five-year proach. Submittal by the February plan for improvements. These sum- date will allow adequate time for OCE maries will be submitted to DAEN- review and approval prior to annual CWE by 1 June for coordination with budget submittals. DAEN-CWO, CWB and DSZ-A, prior to (iv) Division commanders are dele- the annual budget request. Summaries gated authority to approve detailed should not be used to obtain approval plans for subsystems and networks of of significant changes in master plans. approved master plans. Plans approved Sources of funding for all items for by the division commander should each district and for the division meet the following conditions: should be delineated so that total sys- (A) The plan conforms to an approved tem expenditures and funding requests master plan. are identified. Changes in the master (B) The equipment is capable of func- plan submitted 1 February should be tioning independently. documented in this letter summary if (C) An evaluation of alternatives has the changes were approved. been completed considering reliability, (7) Summary of runoff potentials in cur- cost and other important factors. rent season (RCS DAEN-CWO–2). (i) The (D) The plan is economically justi- Chief of Engineers and staff require in- fied, except in special cases where legal formation to respond to inquiries from requirements dictate performance members of Congress and others re- standards which cannot be economi- garding runoff potentials. Therefore, cally justified. the division commander will submit a (v) Copies of plans approved by the snowmelt runoff and flood potential division commander shall be forwarded letter report covering the snow accu- to appropriate elements in OCE in sup- mulation and runoff period, beginning port of funding requests and to obtain generally in February and continuing approval of Automatic Data Processing monthly, until the potential no longer Equipment (ADPE), when applicable. exist. Dispatch of supplemental reports (vi) Water control data systems may will be determined by the urgencies of be funded from Plant Revolving Fund; situations as they occur. The reports

231

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00241 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR § 222.5 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–10 Edition)

will be forwarded as soon as hydrologic (i) To provide oversight and guidance data are available, but not later than during the development of basin-wide the 10th of the month. For further in- management plans for Mississippi formation on reporting refer to ER 500– River Basin projects for which the US 1–1, 33 CFR part 203. Army Corps of Engineers has oper- (ii) During major drought situations ation/regulation responsibilities. or low-flow conditions, narrative sum- (ii) To serve as a forum for resolution maries of the situation should be fur- of water control problems among US nished to alert the Chief of Engineers Army Corps of Engineers Divisions regarding the possibility of serious within the Mississippi River Basin runoff deficiencies that are likely to when agreement is otherwise call for actions associated with Corps unobtainable. of Engineers reservoirs. (o) List of projects. Projects owned and (iii) The reports referred to in para- operated by the Corps of Engineers sub- graphs (m)(7) (i) and (ii) of this section ject to this regulation are listed with will include general summaries regard- pertinent data in Appendix E. This list ing the status of reservoir storage, ex- will be updated periodically to include isting and forecasted at the time of the Corps projects completed in the future. reports. Federal legislation, Federal regula- (8) Reports on project operations during tions and local agreements have given flood emergencies. Information on the Corps of Engineers wide respon- project regulations to be included in sibilities for operating projects which reports submitted to the Chief of Engi- it does not own. Non-Corps projects neers during flood emergencies in ac- subject to this regulation are included cordance with ER 500–1–1 include rate in Appendix A of ER 1110–2–241. of inflow and outflow in CFS, reservoir levels, predicted maximum level and APPENDIX A TO § 222.5—REFERENCES anticipated date, and percent of flood 1. The Federal Power Act, Pub. L. 436–83, ap- control storage utilized to date. Max- proved 10 June 1920, as amended (41 Stat. imum use should be made of computer- 1063; 16 U.S.C. 791(a)) ized communication facilities in re- 2. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act ap- porting project status to DAEN-CWO- proved 22 June 1936, as amended (49 Stat. E/CWE-HW in accordance with the re- 1571; 33 U.S.C. 701(c)) quirements of ER 500–1–1, 33 CFR part 3. Section 9(b) of Reclamation Project Act of 1939, approved 4 August 1939 (53 Stat. 1187; 203. 43 U.S.C. 485) (9) Post-flood summaries of project regu- 4. Section 7 of the Flood Control Act ap- lation. Project regulation effects in- proved 22 December 1944 (58 Stat. 890; 33 cluding evaluation of the stage reduc- U.S.C. 709) tions at key stations and estimates of 5. Section 5 of Small Reclamation Projects damages prevented by projects will be Act of 6 August 1956, as amended (70 Stat. included in the post flood reports re- 1046; 43 U.S.C. 422(e)) quired by ER 500–1–1, 33 CFR part 203. 6. Section 9 of Pub. L. 436–83d Congress (68 (n) Water Control Management Boards. Stat. 303) (1) The Columbia River Treaty Perma- 7. The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1958, Pub. L. 85–624 nent Engineering Board was formed in 8. The Federal Water Project Recreation Act accordance with the Columbia River Uniform Policies, Pub. L. 89–72 Treaty with Canada. This board, com- 9. The National Environmental Policy Act of posed of U.S. and Canadian members, 1969, Pub. L. 91–190 oversees the implementation of the 10. The Clean Water Act of 1977, Pub. L. 95– Treaty as carried out by the U.S. and 217 Canadian Entities. 11. Executive Order 12088, Federal Compli- (2) The Mississippi River Water Con- ance with Pollution Control Standards, 13 trol Management Board was estab- October 1978 lished by ER 15–2–13. It consists of the 12. 33 CFR 208.10, Local flood protection works; maintenance and operation of Division Commanders from LMVD, structures and facilities (9 FR 9999; 9 FR MRD, NCD, ORD, and SWD with the 10203) Director of Civil Works serving as 13. 33 CFR 208.11, Regulations for use of Stor- chairman. The purposes of the Board age Allocated for Flood Control or Naviga- are: tion and/or Project Operation at Reservoirs

232

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00242 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 222.5

subject to Prescription of Rules and Regu- That this section shall not apply to the Ten- lations by the Secretary of the Army in nessee Valley Authority, except that in case the Interest of Flood Control and Naviga- of danger from floods on the Lower Ohio and tion (43 FR 47184) Mississippi Rivers the Tennessee Valley Au- 14. AR 18–1 thority is directed to regulate the release of 15. ER 11–2–101 water from the Tennessee River into the 16. ER 15–2–13 Ohio River in accordance with such instruc- 17. ER 500–1–1, 33 CFR part 203 tions as may be issued by the War Depart- 18. ER 1110–2–241, 33 CFR part 208 ment.’’ 19. ER 1110–2–1400 3. Section 9(b) of the Reclamation Project 20. ER 1110–2–1402 Act of 1939, approved 4 August 1939 (53 Stat. 21. ER 1110–2–1941 1189, 43 U.S.C. 485), provides that the Sec- 22. ER 1125–2–301 retary of the Interior may allocate to flood 23. ER 1130–2–303 control or navigation as part of the cost of 24. ER 1130–2–334 new projects or supplemental works; and 25. ER 1130–2–415 that in connection therewith he shall con- 26. ER 1130–2–417 sult with the Chief of Engineers and may 27. ER 1130–2–419 perform any necessary investigations under 28. EM 1110–2–3600 a cooperative agreement with the Secretary of the Army. These projects are subject to 33 APPENDIX B TO § 222.5—SUMMARY OF CORPS OF CFR 208.11 regulations. ENGINEERS RESPONSIBILITIES FOR PRE- 4. Several dams have been constructed by SCRIBING REGULATIONS FOR NON-CORPS RES- State agencies under provisions of legisla- ERVOIR PROJECTS tive acts wherein the Secretary of the Army Summary is directed to prescribe rules and regulations for project operation in the interest of flood 1. (a) ‘‘Regulations for Use of Storage Allo- control and navigation. These projects are cated for Flood Control or Navigation and/or subject to 33 CFR 208.11 regulations. Project Operation at Reservoirs subject to 5. There are few dams constructed under Prescription of Rules and Regulations by the Emergency Conservation work authority or Secretary of the Army in the Interest of similar programs, where the Corps of Engi- Flood Control and Navigation’’ (33 CFR neers has performed major repairs or reha- 208.11) prescribe the responsibilities and gen- bilitation, that are operated and maintained eral procedures for regulating reservoir by local agencies which are subject to 33 projects capable of regulation for flood con- CFR 208.11 regulations. trol or navigation and the use of storage al- 6. The Federal Power Act, approved 10 located for such purposes and provided on June 1920, as amended (41 Stat. 1063, 16 U.S.C. the basis of flood control and navigation, ex- 791 (A)), established the Federal Power Com- cept projects owned and operated by the mission, now Federal Energy Regulatory Corps of Engineers; the International Bound- Commission (FERC), with authority to issue ary and Water Commission, United States licenses for constructing, operating, and and Mexico; and those under the jurisdiction maintaining dams or other project works for of the International Joint Commission, the development of navigation, for utiliza- United States and Canada, and the Columbia tion of water power and for other beneficial River Treaty. public uses in any streams over which Con- (b) Pertinent information on projects for gress has jurisdiction. The Chief of Engineers which regulations are prescribed under Sec- is called upon for advice and assistance as tion 7 of the 1944 Flood Control Act, (Pub. L. needed in formulating reservoir regulation 78–58 Stat. 890 (33 U.S.C. 709)) the Federal requirements somewhat as follows: Power Act (41 Stat. 1063 (16 U.S.C. 791(A))) a. In response to requests from the FERC, and Section 9 of Pub. L. 436–83d Congress (68 opinions and technical appraisals are fur- Stat. 303) is published in the FEDERAL REG- nished by the Corps of Engineers for consid- ISTER in accordance with 33 CFR 208.11. eration prior to issuance of licenses by the Publication in the FEDERAL REGISTER es- FERC. Such assistance may be limited to tablishes the fact and the date of a project’s general presentations, or may include rel- regulation plan promulgation. atively detailed proposals for water control 2. Section 7 of Act of Congress approved 22 plans, depending upon the nature and scope December 1944 (58 Stat. 890; 33 U.S.C. 709), of projects under consideration. The infor- reads as follows: mation furnished is subject to such consider- ‘‘Hereafter, it shall be the duty of the Sec- ation and use as the Chairman, FERC, deems retary of War to prescribe regulations for the appropriate. This may result in inclusion of use of storage allocated for flood control or simple provisions in licenses without elabo- navigation at all reservoirs constructed ration, or relatively detailed requirements wholly or in part with Federal funds pro- for reservoir regulation schedules and plans. vided on the basis of such purposes, and the b. Some special acts of Congress provide operation of any such project shall be in ac- for construction of dams and reservoirs by cordance with such regulations: Provided, non-Federal agencies or private firms under

233

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00243 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR § 222.5 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–10 Edition)

licenses issued by the FERC, subject to stip- APPENDIX C TO § 222.5—PROCEDURES FOR DE- ulation that the operation and maintenance VELOPING AND PROCESSING REGULATIONS of the dams shall be subject to reasonable FOR NON-CORPS PROJECTS IN CONFORMANCE rules and regulations of the Secretary of the WITH 33 CFR 208.11 Army in the interest of flood control and navigation. Ordinarily no Federal funds are 1. Sequence of actions. a. Discussions lead- involved, thus Section 7 of the 1944 Flood ing to a clarification of conditions governing Control Act does not apply. However, if allocations of storage capacity to flood con- issuance of regulations by the Secretary of trol or navigation purposes and project regu- the Army is required by the authority under lation are initiated by District/Division En- which flood control or navigation provisions gineers through contacts with owners and/or are included as functions of the specific operating agencies concerned at regional project or otherwise specified in the FERC level. license, regulation plans will be prescribed in b. Background information on the project accordance with 33 CFR 208.11 regulations. and conditions requiring flood control or 7. Projects constructed by the Corps of En- navigation services, and other relevant fac- gineers for local flood protection purposes tors, are assembled by the District Engineer are subject to conditions of local cooperation and incorporated in a ‘‘Preliminary Informa- as provided in Section 3 of the Flood Control tion Report’’. The Preliminary Information Act approved 22 June 1936, as amended. One Report will be submitted to the Division En- of those conditions is that a responsible local gineer for review and approval. Normally, agency will maintain and operate all works the agency having jurisdiction over the par- after completion in accordance with regula- ticular project is expected to furnish infor- tions prescribed by the Secretary of the mation on project features, the basis for Army. Most such projects consist mainly of storage allocations and any other available levees and flood walls with appurtenant data pertinent to the studies. The Corps of drainage structures. Regulations for oper- Engineers supplements this information as ation and maintenance of these projects has required. been prescribed by the Secretary of the c. Studies required to develop reservoir Army in 33 CFR 208.10. When a reservoir is regulation schedules and plans usually will included in such a project, it may be appro- be conducted by Corps of Engineers per- priate to apply 33 CFR 208.10 in establishing sonnel at District level, except where the regulations for operation, without requiring project regulation affects flows in more than their publication in the FEDERAL REGISTER. one district, in which case the studies will be For example, if the reservoir controls a conducted by or under supervision of Divi- small drainage area, has an uncontrolled sion personnel. Assistance as may be avail- flood control outlet with automatic oper- able from the project operating agency or ation or contains less than 12,500 acre-feet of others concerned will be solicited. flood control or navigation storage, 33 CFR d. When necessary agreements are reached 208.10 may be suitable. However, 33 CFR at district level, and regulations developed 208.11 regulations normally would be applica- in accordance with 33 CFR 208.11 and EM ble in prescribing flood control regulations 1110–2–3600, they will be submitted to the Di- for the individual reservoir, if the project vision Commander for review and approval, has a gated flood control outlet by which the with information copies for DAEN-CWE-HW. local agency can regulate floods. Usually the regulations include diagrams of 8. Regulation plans for projects owned by operating parameters. the Corps of Engineers are not prescribed in e. For projects owned by the Bureau of accordance with 33 CFR 208.11. However, reg- Reclamation, the respective Regional Direc- ulation plans for projects constructed by the tors are designated as duly authorized rep- Corps of Engineers and turned over to other resentatives of the Commissioner of Rec- agencies or local interests for operation may lamation. By letter of 20 October 1976, the be prescribed in accordance with 33 CFR Commissioner delegated responsibilities to 208.11. the Regional Directors as follows: ‘‘Regard- 9. The Small Reclamation Projects Act of ing the designated authorization of rep- 6 August 1956 provides that the Secretary of resentatives of the Commissioner of Rec- the Interior may make loans or grants to lamation in matters relating to the develop- local agencies for the construction of rec- ment and processing of Section 7 flood con- lamation projects. Section 5 of the Act pro- trol regulations, we are designating each Re- vides in part that the contract covering any gional Director as our duly authorized rep- such grant shall set forth that operation be resentative to sign all letters of under- in accordance with regulations prescribed by standing, water control agreements, water the head of the Federal department or agen- control diagrams, water control release cy primarily concerned. Normally, 33 CFR schedules and other documents which may 208.11 is not applicable to these projects. become part of the prescribed regulations.

234

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00244 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 222.5

The Regional Director also will be respon- of the Chief of Engineers will forward the sible for obtaining the signature of the des- pertinent project data to the Liaison Officer ignated operating agency on these docu- with the Federal Register, requesting publi- ments where such is required. Regarding in- cation in the FEDERAL REGISTER. ternal coordination within the Bureau of g. Regulations developed in accordance Reclamation, the Regional Directors will ob- with 33 CFR 208.11 and applicable to projects tain the review and approval of this office that are not under supervision of the Bureau and at appropriate offices with our Engineer- of Reclamation are processed in substan- ing and Research Center, Denver, Colorado, tially the manner described above. All co- prior to signing water control documents.’’ ordination required between the Corps of En- f. In accordance with the delegation cited gineers and the operating agency will be ac- in paragraph e, 33 CFR 208.11 regulations per- complished at field level. taining to Bureau of Reclamation projects h. Upon completion of actions listed above, will be processed as follows: Division Commanders are responsible for in- (1) After regulation documents submitted forming the operating agencies at field level by District Commanders are reviewed and that regulations have been promulgated. approved by the Division Commander they 2. Signature blocks: Some 33 CFR 208.11 reg- are transmitted to the respective Regional ulations contain diagrams of parameter Director of the Bureau of Reclamation for curves that cannot be published in the FED- concurrence of comment, with a request that ERAL REGISTER, but are made a part thereof tracings of regulation diagrams be signed by appropriate reference. Each diagram and returned to the Division Commander. bears a title block with spaces for the signa- (2) If any questions arise at this stage ap- ture of authenticating officials of the Corps propriate actions are taken to resolve dif- of Engineers and the owner/operating agency ferences. Otherwise, the duplicate tracings of of the project involved. the regulation diagram are signed by the Di- 3. Designation of Corps of Engineers Rep- vision Commander and transmitted to the of- resentatives. Division Commanders are des- fice of the project owner for filing. ignated representatives of the Chief of Engi- (3) After full agreement has been reached neers in matters relating to development and in steps (1) and (2), the text of proposed regu- processing of 33 CFR 208.11 regulations for lations is prepared in final form. Copies of eventual promulgation through publication any diagrams involved are included for infor- of selected data specified in paragraph (d)(11) mation only. § 208.11. Division Commanders are designated (4) A letter announcing completion of ac- as the Corps of Engineers signee on all let- tion on processing the regulations, with per- ters of understanding, water control agree- tinent project data as specified in paragraph ments and other documents which may be- 208.11(d)(11) of 33 CFR 208.11, and one copy of come part of prescribed regulations for the signed tracings of diagrams are for- projects located in their respective geo- warded to HQDA (DAEN-CWE-HW) WASH DC graphic areas, and which are subject to the 20314 for promulgation and filing. The office provisions of 33 CFR 208.11.

APPENDIX D TO § 222.5—SAMPLE TABULATION Bardwell Lake, Monthly Lake Report, May 1975

Elevations 0800: Storage Evap Pump Release Inflow Rain, Day 2,400 feet-MSL 2400 A-F DSF DSF DSF adj. DSF inch

1 ...... 421.30 421.31 55979 28 2 .0 0 84 0 .00 2 ...... 421.32 421.37 56196 5 2 .0 0 117 .00 3 ...... 421.43 421.44 56449 23 1 .9 0 152 .14 4 ...... 421.45 421.47 56558 1 1 .8 0 58 .00 5 ...... 421.49 421.34 56088 1 2 .0 324 50 .00 6 ...... 421.20 421.01 54902 14 1 .9 632 50 .00 7 ...... 420.88 420.89 54473 4 2 .0 269 59 .09 8 ...... 420.89 420.91 54544 5 2 .3 0 44 .00 9 ...... 420.90 420.89 54473 11 1 .5 0 38 .00 10 ...... 420.90 420.90 54509 28 3.0 0 27 .00 11 ...... 420.91 421.35 56124 26 1.8 0 824 .00 12 ...... 421.54 421.65 57213 31 2.1 0 582 1 .61 13 ...... 421.70 421.75 57578 29 2.2 0 216 .00 14 ...... 421.78 421.76 57614 34 1.9 249 303 .03 15 ...... 421.69 421.52 56739 22 1.9 643 225 .57 16 ...... 421.39 421.28 55871 39 2.1 535 138 .00 17 ...... 421.19 421.09 55188 10 2.2 393 119 .00 18 ...... 421.03 421.05 55045 46 2.0 143 60 .00 19 ...... 421.04 421.07 55116 17 2.3 0 55 .00 20 ...... 421.06 421.30 55943 21 2.1 0 440 .21 21 ...... 421.39 421.47 56558 20 2.1 0 332 .97 22 ...... 421.50 421.39 56268 42 2.1 247 145 .00 23 ...... 421.37 424.91 69726 31 2.0 328 7146 .22

235

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00245 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR § 222.5 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–10 Edition)

APPENDIX D TO § 222.5—SAMPLE TABULATION—Continued Bardwell Lake, Monthly Lake Report, May 1975

Elevations 0800: Storage Evap Pump Release Inflow Rain, Day 2,400 feet-MSL 2400 A-F DSF DSF DSF adj. DSF inch

24 ...... 425.61 426.15 74825 22 2.0 0 2595 2.38 25 ...... 426.15 426.55 76523 18 2.3 0 876 .11 26 ...... 426.72 426.80 77598 42 2.1 0 586 .00 27 ...... 426.95 427.00 78465 23 2.0 0 462 .00 28 ...... 427.14 427.15 79116 31 2.1 0 361 .19 29 ...... 427.31 427.70 81528 61 1.9 0 1279 .20 30 ...... 427.94 428.05 83082 11 2.0 0 796 1 .02 31 ...... 428.20 428.22 83837 7 2 .1 0 389 .00 Monthly total: (DSF) ...... 700 64 3763 18626 7.74 (A-F) ...... 27966 1389 126 7464 36945 ......

236

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00246 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 222.5

3 , PL 391–70. . 36. t 65. Auth legis –89 un 36. May 28. Aug 41. Aug 41, RHA Jul 64. CA May 28, PL 391–70. FCA Oct 65. PL 79–525. PL 79–14. PL 298–89. PL 0 FCA Oct 65. 0 0 RHA Jul 46, FCA May 28. 0 0 FCA Aug 68. 0 700 FCA May 50, PL 516. 100 0 FCA Aug 68, PL 90–483. Area in acres 25,000 94 RHA 1960. RHA 25,000 94 Upper Lower 7,070 7,070 RHA 1950. RHA 7,070 7,070 0 0 0 FCA Aug 68. 0 46,500 17,500 RHA 1950. RHA 0 46,500 17,500 0 21,000 110 PL 74–839. 0 21,000 PL 110 .0 0 0 PL 90–483. PL .0 0 .0 0 0 FCA Oct 65. 7.0 12,200 12,200 RHA 1950. RHA 7.0 12,200 8.5 59,000 26,800 FCA Oct 65. 67.0 0 0 FCA 1941. FCA 67.0 0 209.0 430 90 RHA 1950. WSA 1958. 209.3 33,400 5,100 FCA Jun 36. 0 0.0 0 0 FC Act 36. 0 521.0 1,020 460 HD 507. HD 0 521.0 1,020 460 0 230.0 28,000 6,100 FCA Jun 36. M.S.L. 2.5 445.0 50,440 24,580 SD 44. SD 24,580 50,440 2.5 445.0 423.0 345.0 23,800 6,400 RHA 1950, WSA 1958. Elev limits feet Upper Lower

AF 1,000 Storage ROJECTS P

2 IST OF pose Project pur- NMCAR 233.0 445.0 429.5 0 7,100 36. 0 FN 429.5 Jun 445.0 FCA 0.0 3.0 NMCAR 233.0 0 0 § 222.5—L

1 TO E Lower Mississippi Valley Division PPENDIX Teche. A MO New Madrid ...... Mississippi ...... F 0.0 330.5 328.5 131,000 71,000 FCA May 28. State/county Stream State/county 1 Project name Floodway. Alligator—Catfish FG ...... Arkabutla Lk MS Issaquena ...... Ascalmore—Tippo FG & CS ...... MS Desoto Little Sunflower ...... Bienvenue FG ...... MS Tallahatchie ...... ColdwaterBig Lk Ditch #81 CS ...... F LA St Bernard ...... Ascalmore ...... F ...... Big Lk Div CS AR Mississippi ...... Bayou Bienvenue ...... F Big Lk North End CS ...... AR Mississippi ...... Ditch 81 Extension...... Big Lk South end CS F ...... AR Mississippi ...... Little R ...... Birds Point—New Madrid Div C AR Mississippi ...... Little R ...... C ...... Ditch 28Bodcau Lk C ...... Bonnet Carre Div Spillway C 525.0 0.0 LA Bossier ...... Bowman Lock LA St Charles ...... Bayou Bodcau ...... 238.3 Caddo Lk 0.0 ...... LA Vermilion Mississippi R 0.0 ...... Cairo 10th & 20th St PS ...... F LA Caddo 0.0 ...... 136.0 GIWW F Calcasieu SW Barrier & Lock ...... IL Pulaski 0.0 ...... Cypress Bayou ...... I LA Calcasieu 118.0 0.0 0.0 Ohio ...... N 2.0 Calion L&D ...... 0.0 ...... Calcasieu R 0.0 Calument FG East & West F ...... AR Union 0.0 ...... 0.0 I LA St Mary 2.0 230.0 0 Ouachita ...... 0 0.0 Cannon Re-reg ...... 230 Wax Lake Outlet Bayou 35.3 0.0 Carlyle Lk N ...... MO Ralls 230.0 ...... 0.0 IL Clinton 199.5 230.0 Salt R 0 ...... 0 0 128.6 Catahoula Lk CS 0 ...... FCA Jun FCA J 0.0 Kaskaskia RCatfish Point CS PCA 157...... 24.0 LA LaSalle ...... 182.7 ...... 0 Charenton FG F 0.0 LA Cameron ...... Catahoula Div 0 ...... Cocodrie FG ...... 0 0 16 1.2 20.0 LA St Mary ...... PL 298 0.0 FCA Oc ...... 310.5 Mermentau R CR Collins Cr ...... LA Concorida ...... Grand Lk ...... Columbia L&D ...... FN 0.0 ...... MS Warren 299 Bayou Cocodrie 1.2 FN ...... Connerly CS 0 ...... 1.2 LA Caldwell ...... 0 ...... Collins Cr 5.8 Courtableau Drainage CS F AR Chicot 77.0 ...... Ouachita ...... Darbonne CS ...... F LA St Landry 699.0 ...... 528. Connerly Bayou 1.2 N DeGray LK ...... 0 LA St. Landry 7 ...... 118.0 Bayou Courtableau ...... 46 ...... 0 DeGray Rereg. St FCR AR Desoto FCA ...... Bayou Darbonne F ...... Ditch Bayou Dam ...... AR Clark 34.0 0.0 Caddo ...... FI Drainage Dist #17 PS 0 ...... AR Chicot ...... 0 0.0 Caddo ...... Drinkwater PS FNPMRA ...... AR Mississippi ...... 27.0 Ditch Bayou ...... Dupre FG NMRA ...... 0.0 1.2 MO Mississippi ...... Ditch 71 ...... East St Louis PS 0.0 FCR ...... LA St Bernard 0 0.0 ...... Drinkwater Sewer RHA Oct 62 0.0 Empire FG Hurr Prot & Lock 0.0 F IL St. Clair 881.9 ...... 46.0 ...... Bayou Dupre 1.2 Enid Lk ...... F LA Plaque mines ...... IDD 84.0 116.0 0.0 ...... F 0.0 Felsenthal L&D 52.0 MS Yalobusha 13.0 ...... F Mississippi R ...... 0.0 ...... 106. 3.6 AR Union Yacona ...... F ...... 18.0 0 52.0 Ouachita 18.0 221.0 F 0.0 ...... 0 16.0 N 106.0 16.0 3.0 0 20.6 FCA 93.0 236.0 0 0.0 0 315.0

237

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00247 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR § 222.5 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–10 Edition)

GD 359–77. Auth legis 645. A May 50. R&H Act, Aug 30/35. R&H Act, 8/30/35. R&H Act, 8/30/1935. FCA 1941. FC Act 62. 2,860 FCA Oct 65. 0 FCA Jun 30. 1,300 1,200 SD 44. SD 1,300 1,200 4,600 9,800 FCA Jun 36. Area in acres Upper Lower 0 0 RHA Jul 46. 0 0 FCA Sep 54, PL 780–83. 0 0 0 FCA Oct 65. .0 94 22 FCA 1948, PL 85–500. .0 7,120 7,120 RHA 1950. RHA 7,120 .0 7,120 80.0 0 0 FCA Dec 44. 90.0 0 0 FCA Aug 68. 119.6 0 0 PL 90–483. PL 0 119.6 0 436.9 1941. 0 FCA 0 429.7 18,000 16,600 R&H Act, Jul 3/30. 8 140.0 149,000 2,500 FCA May 28, PL 85–500. 0 40.0 0 0 PL 90–483. 90–483. 0 40.0 90–483. PL 2 64.0 0 PL 0 91.5 0 0 PL 0 0 0 5 599.7 25,300 11,100 HD 232. HD 11,100 25,300 5 599.7 .0 445.0 13,000 12,000 R&H Act, Jul 3/30. .0 414.0 30,000 27,700 R&H Act, Jul 3/30. 507. HD 18,600 38,400 .0 606.0 541. HD 18,900 24,800 .0 410.0 .4 236.0 58,500 10,700 FCA Jun 36. M.S.L. 5.0 140.2 90–483. 0 PL 0 07.2 165.0 18,500 1,400 FCA May 50. Elev limits feet Upper Lower AF —Continued 1,000 Storage

2 ROJECTS P pose Project pur- NI 5,900 18,600 5,400 567.2 FP 606.0 18,900 PMCAR 457.0 2,500 504.0 9,800 407.9 563.0 391.3 405.0 MA 160.0 IST OF

1 § 222.5—L TO E PPENDIX A LA LaFourche ...... Bayou LaFourche ...... F 0.0 3.0 LA W. Feliciana ...... 3.0 Old R ...... F 0 0 FCA Oct 65, PL 89–298. 0.0 70.0 5.0 0 0 PL 83–780. State/county Stream State/county 1 Project name FG. Aux. Finley Street PS ...... Freshwater Lock TN Dyer ...... LA Vermilion Forked Deer ...... Graham Burke PS ...... Freshwater Bayou F Grenada Lk AR Phillips ...... Huxtable PS I MS Grenada ...... White ...... Jonesville L&D ...... AR Lee ...... Yalobusha Skuna F Kaskaskia L&D ...... LA Catahoula St Francis ...... L&D 1 ...... IL Randolph F ...... Black ...... L&D 2 F ...... LA Catahula ...... Kaskaskia R ...... L&D 3 ...... N LA Rapides ...... Red R ...... N L&D 4 ...... 0.5 LA Rapides ...... Red R ...... L&D 5 N ...... LA Natchitoches ...... 2,805.0 Red R ...... 269.0 0.0 L&D 24 N ...... LA Red R ...... Red R 1,357.4 174. N ...... MO Pike 257 2,863.0 Red R ...... L&D 25 ...... N ...... 231.0 0.0 Mississippi R ...... N 2 MO Lincoln ...... N L&D 26 193.0 0.0 ...... Mississippi R 1.1 0.0 ...... 6 IL Madison ...... Larose to Golden Meadow Hurr Prot N 0.0 34.0 368.0 Mississippi R ...... 0.0 N Little Sun flower CS 0.0 363.0 40. 0 34 ...... Lk #9 Culvert & PS MS Issaquena 0.0 71...... Lk Chicot PS 0.0 KY Fulton 95...... 29.7 Lit. Sunflower ...... Lk Greeson 120.0 ...... AR Chicot ...... Mississippi 0 14 ...... F 449 ...... PL 86– AR Pike 49.7 ...... Macon LkLk Ouachita F ...... Little MissouriLong Branch DS ...... 107.1 FCR AR Garland 434.0 ...... P Mark Twain Lk LA Catahoula ...... Ouachita 419 ...... MO Ralls Catahoula Div ...... Marked Tree Siphon P ...... Salt RMorganza Div CS F ...... AR Poinsett ...... Muddy Bayou CS F 0.0 LA Point Coupee ...... St. Francis ...... Old River Div CS Low Sill Overbank & 0.0 ...... MS Warren 6.5 Morganza Floodway ...... F ...... 85.0 118.2 Muddy Bayou 286.0 Old River Lock F ...... 0.0 ...... FC Port Allen Lock 60.0 ...... LA W Feliciana 282. 563.0 ...... Prairie Dupont East & West PS 0.0 LA Port Allen ...... Old RRapides-Boeuf Div Canal CS 894.0 IL St Clair 0.0 ...... GIWW 592.0 Rend Lk ...... N ...... LA Rapides IDD 0 ...... 638 N IL Franklin 32.5 4 ...... Bayou Rapides F Sardis Lk ...... 0.0 ...... Big Muddy R ...... Schooner Bayou CS & Lock 30.0 F 0.0 MS Panola ...... 32.5 ...... F 229.0 0 Shelbyville Lk LA Vermilion ...... Little Sunflower ...... 76.9 59.5 IL Shelby 198.3 ...... Schooner Bayou F ...... Kaskaskia R 0 ...... I 70.0 0.0 49.0 F 0.0 0 4,350 0.0 65.4 0 109.0 46.1 0.0 FC 0 10.0 0.0 1,569.9 405 66.0 2.6 281 0 474.0 0.0 FCA May 28. 0.0 62.2 626. 1.2 0 0 1.2 0 0 FCA Aug 41, 0 0 FCA Aug 41.

238

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00248 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 222.5 ct 65. –789, FCA May 28. 0–858. Oct 65. 1941. Jun 36. Jun 36. 87–874. CA Jun 36. PL 85–500. 722 PL 90–483. 722 PL 8 36 PL 77–228. PL 8 36 637 852 PL 77–228. PL 637 852 718 109 PL 90–483. PL 718 109 12,891 7,006 PL 87–874. PL 12,891 7,006 9 4 FCA 1948. FCA 9 4 7 23,200 5,200 HD 159. HD 7 23,200 5,200 0 9,300 2,300 RHA Mar 45, PL 75–761. .0 0 0 FCA Jun 36. 0.0 0 0 FC Act 38. 5.0 7,800 180 FCA Jul 46. 32.0 4,742 1,412 PL 81–516. PL 32.0 4,742 1,412 7 3.5 0 0 FCA May 28. FCR 1.9 5,558.0 5,528.0 109 17 SD 87–90. 3,000 11,100 85–500. 573.0 SD 78–534. 599.7 396–84. NMCAR 180.0 169–90. PL 17 PL HD 109 396–84. 574–87. HD 669–80. 85–500. 1,780 5,528.0 1 HD 0 HD 0 655–76. 315 3,640 HD 247–78. 722 5,558.0 PL 283 565 SD 655–76. 1,277.0 0 760.0 57,000 1,732 1,284.0 396–84. HD 1,780 60,000 12 FCR 1.9 1,420.0 2,540.0 802.0 2,740.0 1,422.0 230 1,307.4 1,412 FNPIMCAR 117.0 1,250.0 HD 1,311.0 HD 0 FRC 10.8 2,754.8 620 2,593.0 5,385.0 FCR 3.0 1,284.0 36 FMCR 15.5 30 1 F 71.6 1,232.9 3,548.0 5,432.0 FCR 26.0 230 F 6.5 44 1,197.0 3,868.0 FQ 26.7 3,585.0 1,252.0 FR FMCAR 1,232.9 122–87. 3,875.0 FR 0.5 820.0 7,006 129.2 875.5 SD F 8.0 0 14.0 5,550.0 FCR 2.6 5,504.0 FR 0.2 852 0 HD 426–76, PL 78–534. Missouri River Division Creek. lee. Cr. Missouri R ...... F 61.0 1,423.0 1,422.0 61,000 60,000 PL 78–534. Missouri R ...... F 977.0 2,250.0 2,246.0 249,000 240,000 PL 73–409. Hughes. Garfield. Sorrell Lock ...... St Francis Lk CS ...... LA Iberville ...... Steele Bayou CS AR Poinsett ...... GIWWTchula Lk Lower FG ...... MS Issaquena Oak Donnick Floodway ...... N Tchula Lk Upper FG MS Humphreys ...... Steele Bayou ...... Teche-Vermilion PS & CS C ...... MS Humphreys ...... Tchula Lk ...... Tensas-Cocodrie PS F ...... LA St Mary ...... Tchula Lk ...... F Treasure Island PS ...... LA Cocordia ...... Atchafalaya R ...... F Wallace Lk ...... MO Dunklin ...... Bayou Corcodrie ...... MI Wappapello Lk LA Caddo ...... Little R ...... F Wasp Lk ...... MO Wayne ...... Cypress Bayou ...... 0.0 West Hickman PS F ...... MS Humphreys ...... St Francis R ...... Wood R PS F 0.0 KY Fulton ...... Wasp Lk-Bear Cr ...... F ...... Yazoo City PS 29. 0.0 IL Madison ...... Mississippi ...... F 0.0 ...... MS Yazoo IDD ...... 0.0 ...... F 0.0 68.5 Yazoo 0.1 110.0 F ...... 210.0 108.0 F Bear Creek Dam & Res 0.0 ...... 60.0 23.4 18.0 84.0 CO Jefferson 96.1 ...... 92.0 Big Bend Dam & Lk Sharpe 613.2 37.0 252.0 ...... 0 Bear Cr 16.0 ...... SD Lyman Buffalo 158.0 0 394.7 23 F 0.0 0 23.0 2,240 FCA 142. Blue Springs Dam & Lk 0 0.0 354...... 111.6 0.0 0 MO Jackson ...... 302.0 0 Blue Stem Lake & Dam 4 0.0 FCA ...... 0 0 Little Blue R 88.5 FCA ...... NE Lancaster 0 296.0 ...... 0.0 FCA F Bowman-Haley Dam & Res 96.0 ...... 0 Olive Br. Salt Creek ...... PL 89 ND Bowman 28.8 0 F ...... Branched Oak Lk & Dam 18 0 69 FCA O ...... 5,635.5 No Fk Grand River ...... NE Lancaster 5,558.0 ...... F Oak Creek trib. Salt Bull Hook Dam 0 ...... F MT Hill 15.8 ...... Cedar Canyon Dam ...... Bull Hook Cr Scott Cou- Chatfield Dam & Res 820.0 SD Pennington ...... 7.2 CO Douglas 802.0 Deadman’s Gulch 1,322.5 ...... Cherry Cr Dam & Res ...... 1,307.4 S Platte 72.7 F ...... CO Araphahoe 2,777.0 ...... F Clinton Dam & Lk 982 ...... 2,754.8 Cherry Cr 660 ...... KS Douglas ...... F Cold Brook Dam & Res 5,131 Wakarusa R ...... 315 SD Fall River 1,732 F ...... Conestoga Lake & Dam 12 PL ...... Cold Brook ...... NE Lancaster ...... F 204.7 0.1 Holmes Cr Trib to Salt 5,500.0 Cottonwood Springs Dam & Res 3,545.0 ...... 5,4 3,526.0 SD Fall River 80.0 ...... Fort Peck Dam & Res ...... 5,598.0 Cottonwood Springs Cr 267.8 MT Valley, Mc Cone 5,550.0 11 F 903.4 2, 875.5 6.7 2 3,651.4 PL 8 3,585.0 19 7.7 3,936.0 3,875.0 214 44 PL 77–228.

239

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00249 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR § 222.5 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–10 Edition)

3 Auth legis 90–483. L 90–483. PL 78–534, SD 247–78. HD 578–87. PL 90–483. 28 PL 85–500. 28 PL 000 PL 78–534. 000 PL ,000 PL 78–534. ,000 PL 2,429 PL 89–298. 2,429 PL 365,000 PL 78–534. 365,000 PL 55,600 PL 83–780. PL 55,600 174 HD 396–84. HD 174 754 885 PL 89–298. PL 754 885 Area in acres Upper Lower 0 13,948 6,928 PL 83–780. PL 0 13,948 6,928 .0 38 0 PL 80–858, 84–99. 1.0 1,960 930 PL 90–483. PL 1.0 1,960 930 46.0 23,064 13,249 PL 77–228. PL 13,249 46.0 23,064 617.0 373,000 359,000 PL 78–534. PL 617.0 373,000 359,000 1,463.0 13,999 3,560 PL 75–761. PL 1,463.0 13,999 3,560 6 891.5 25,342 12,202 PL 83–780. PL 12,202 25,342 6 891.5 .0 917.0 7,410 4,580 PL 83–780. PL .0 917.0 7,410 4,580 .2 1,144.4 27,255 17,270 PL 83–780. .2 1,144.4 PL 27,255 17,270 M.S.L. Elev limits feet Upper Lower AF —Continued 1,000 Storage

2 ROJECTS P pose Project pur- F 5.7 1,266.0 1,242.4 410 100 PL 85–500. 349–90. PL HD 396–84. 100 0 392 HD 410 1,085.0 FNPIMCAR 13,649.0 2,246.0 247–78. 3 247–78. 2,160.0 FNPIMCAR 238–89. 642–81. 240,000 SD 3,021.0 1,365.0 1,320.0 SD 95,000 129,000 41,000 1,242.4 365,000 1,121.0 92,000 1,775.0 1,850.0 FNPIMCAR 17,440.0 PL 75–529, HD 238–73. 100 169–90. 85–500. HD HD 1,218.0 FRCA 3.9 0 4,580 1,266.0 HD FI 349–90. PL 852.4 396–84. 0 FPCR 349–90. 1,242.4 917.0 2,429 0 FNMCAR 76.3 1,203.4 930 F 5.7 342.6 HD 751.1 4 642–81. 1,946.0 HD 706.0 HD 1,875.0 FCR 0.8 810.0 635.0 13,249 174 791.0 FI 55,600 0 891.0 0 HD 10 1 HD 892–76, PL–78–534. 1,314.0 FCAR 34.6 255 0 HD 549–81, PL 87–874. FCAR 22.1 246 728 1,060.5 55.8 FNMCAR 1,463.0 0 1,335.0 1,069.0 1,425.0 1,206.0 FCA 122 3,560 154.4 1,110.0 1,036.0 1,096.0 960.0 FCR 1.5 825.0 0 PL 78–534, HD 842–76. 1,244.3 388.8 6,928 1,144.4 FCAR 3.4 1,080.0 15,709 FCAR 2.7 891.5 0 PL 75–761, HD 549–81. FCR 8.5 0 HD 642–81, PL 75–761. FN 243.2 IST OF

1 § 222.5—L TO E Cr. PPENDIX A NE Knox ...... FNPIMCAR 95.0 1,208.0 1,204.5 29,000 25,000 SD 247–78. SD 8 Counties ...... FNPIMCAR 16,789.0 1,617.0 1,540.0 359,000 117,000 SD 247–78. State/county Stream State/county 1 Project name Fort Randall Dam, Lk Francis Case ... SD Gregory Charles ...... Garrison Dam, Lk Sakakawea ...... Missouri R ...... ND Mercer McLean ...... Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lk F Missouri R ...... SD YanktonGlenn Cunningham Lk, Dam 11 F ...... Missouri R NE Douglas ...... Harlan County Lk F ...... Little Papillion Cr NE Harlan ...... Harry S Truman Dam & Res F 985.0 ...... Republican R ...... 1,375.0 MO Benton 1,494.0 ...... F 1,365.0 1,854.0 102,000 Osage RHillsdale Lk ...... 1,850.0 ...... 95, 382,000 KS Miami F ...... Holmes Park Lk & Dam 17 61.0 ...... Big Bull Cr 1,210.0 ...... NE Lancaster ...... 1,208.0 14.0 F Antelope Cr Trib to Salt 1,142.0 Kanopolis Lk 32,000 498.0 ...... 1,121.0 29 1,973.5 KS Ellsworth 4,005.9 ...... Kelly Road Dam 1,9 ...... Smoky Hill RLong Branch Lk 922 ...... CO Araphoe ...... 739.6 ...... F MO Randolph Westerly Cr ...... Longview Lk 706.0 ...... 392 Little East Fk Chariton R 209,300 F 83.6 P MO Jackson F ...... Melvern Lk 931 ...... Little Blue R ...... KS Osage ...... F Milford Lk ...... Marais des Cygnes R .... 370.0 KS Geary ...... Oahe Dam & Lk F 1,508.0 ...... Republican R ...... ND 4 Counties ...... Olive Cr Lk & Dam 2 0.3 F 30.4 ...... Missouri R 5,362.0 ...... NE Lancaster 5,342 ...... 801.0 F Papio Dam Site #18 & Lk ...... 24.8 Olive Br of Salt Cr ...... NE Douglas 791.1 ...... Papio Dam Site #20 & Lk F 909.0 208.4 ...... Boxelder Cr Papio 3,670 1,057.0 .... NE Sarpy ...... 89 Pawnee Lk & Dam 14 1,036. F ...... 756.7 Trib South Branch Papio 1,176 NE Lancaster 1,097.0 F ...... Perry Lk 1,620.0 ...... No. Middle Cr of Salt 1, KS Jefferson F ...... Pipestem Dam & Res ...... Delaware R ...... 4.0 ND Stutsman ...... F 1,350.0 Pipestem Cr 1,335.0 ...... 7.1 F 1,128.2 6.1 1,110.0 355 1,113.1 21.0 1,096.0 1,263.5 595 1,244.3 521.9 493 1,470 920. 255 PL 137.0 246 1,496.3 7 1,442.4 4,

240

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00250 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 222.5 85–500. 87–874. 85–500. 90–483. L 90–483. L 85–500. PL 81–516, HD 669–80. PL 79–526. PL 55 PL 85–500. 55 PL 47 PL 87–874. 47 PL 730 FCA Sept 54. ,890 PL 75–761. ,890 PL 7 7 PL 87–874. PL 7 ,184 952 PL 87–874. PL ,184 952 2,060 410 PL 85–500. PL 2,060 410 0 489 124 PL 74–738. PL 124 0 489 4.0 20,948 11,013 PL 83–780. PL 4.0 20,948 11,013 0.0 1,430 160 FCA Sep 54. 50.0 1,100 210 PL 74–738. PL 50.0 1,100 210 218.0 192 0 PL 74–738. PL 218.0 192 0 974.0 8,520 400 PL 83–780. PL 8,520 974.0 400 .0 867.0 38,288 24,777 PL 83–780. PL 24,777 38,288 .0 867.0 6.2 864.2 9,995 7,192 PL 89–298. PL 6.2 864.2 9,995 7,192 36.0 1,075.0 54,179 14,875 PL 75–761. 36.0 1,075.0 PL 54,179 14,875 554.0 1,516.0 19,980 9,040 PL 78–534. 554.0 1,516.0 19,980 PL 9,040 FRC 9.6 1,442.4 1,415.0 885 62 HD 266–89. HD 62 396–84. 561–81. 349–90. 885 549–81. HD HD 1,415.0 842–76. HD 396–84. HD 396–84. 0 0 1,442.4 0 11,013 HD 4,000 0 196 HD 349–90. 912.0 137 HD 844.0 396–84. FRC 9.6 549–89. 1,246.0 0 974.0 FNPCAR 904.0 1 1,060.0 14,875 HD FNMAR 70.6 HD 4 241.6 255 HD FNM 205.4 1,271.1 839.0 303 0 1,061.0 FMCAR 1,104.0 24,777 750.0 10 262–89. 1,306.0 7,890 799.0 7,192 144.6 864.2 HD 760.0 0 FRC 1.9 1,260.0 246 0 1,075.0 867.0 FRC 1.5 0 208 HD 549–81, PL 83–780. 1,341.0 1,069.0 FARPN 887.1 1,287.8 FN 177.1 1,218.0 1,096.0 CFR 2.8 FCR 2.5 1,244.9 113 FCAR 2.7 42 FRC 947 323 952 FCR 2.0 537.0 1,147 1,255.0 247.8 1,780 1,516.0 1,440.0 628.0 261.0 9,040 1,466.0 2,530 FMA 39.8 290.0 0 SD 191–78, 247–78. FMA 92.0 1,554.0 FMA 19.9 F 1,582.0 114.7 AR 60.7 1,228.0 1,162.0 3,020 790 FCA Sep 54. North Atlantic Division hanna R. Lehigh R ...... F 107.8 1,450.0 1,300.0 1,830 80 PL 79–526. Monroe. Pomme De Terre Lk ...... MO Polk ...... Pomona Lk ...... Pomme De Terre R ...... KS Osage ...... F Rathbun Lk ...... 110 Mile Cr ...... IA Appanoose ...... F Smithville Lk ...... Chariton R ...... MO Clay ...... F Spring Gulch Imbankment ...... Little Platte R ...... Stagecoach Lk & Dam 9 ...... CO Douglas ...... F 407.2 NE Lancaster ...... Spring GulchStanding Bear Lk & Dam 16 ...... Hickman Br of Salt Cr 874.0 F ... 176.8 NE Douglas ...... F 1,003.0 Stockton Lk 839.0 ...... Trib Big Papillion Cr 346.3 ...... MO Cedar 15,980 ...... Tuttle Creek Lk F ...... Sac R 926.0 101.8 7 ...... KS Riley ...... F Twin Lakes & Dam 13 90 ...... 87 Big Blue R ...... NE Seward ...... Wagon Train Lk & Dam 8 1.8 F ...... 5,600.00 Middle Cr Salt 4.7 ...... NE Lancaster 5,535.0 ...... 1,285.0 Wehrspann Lk & Dam 20 F ...... Hickman Br of Salt Cr 1,271.1 ... 3.7 NE Sarpy ...... F Wilson Lk 1,121.0 779.6 88 ...... Trib South Branch Papio 1,104.0 490 KS Russell 1,937.4 F 892 ...... Yankee Hill Lk & Dam 10 1,1 ...... Saline R ...... 302 NE Lancaster 196 0 ...... PL F Cardwell Br of Salt Cr 5.3 ... 137 P 1,355.0 F Almond Lake 1,341.0 6.8 ...... Alvin R. Bush Dam 1,302.0 NY Steuben ...... 6.1 ...... 1,287.8 Arkport Dam 505 ...... PA Clinton 1,113.1 Canacadea Cr ...... Aylesworth Cr Lk ...... NY Steuben ...... 530.7 1,096.0 Kettle Cr ...... Beltzville Dam & Lk F 1, PA Lackawanna 660 ...... Canisteo R 2 F ...... PA Carbon, Monroe Aylesworth Cr ...... 493 F ...... Bloomington Lk 5.6 Pohopoco Cr ...... 303 ...... F PL 1,262.0 MD Garret F ...... Blue Marsh Dam & Lk 1,244.9 246 ...... PL North Branch Potomac R F PA Lebanon Berks ...... Cowanesque Lk 475 ...... 14.6 Tulpehocken CRCurwensville Lk ...... PA Tioga ...... 73.4 1,300.0 ...... F PA Clearfield 1,255...... Cowanesque R 208 East Sidney Lk 8.0 ...... 937.0 P ...... West Branch Susque- 1,304.0 1.7 F Foster Joseph Sayers Dam NY Delaware 27.0 ...... 84 1, ...... 1,150.0 Francis E. Walter Dam & Res PA Centre ...... 1,108.0 Ouleout Cr ...... 36.2 651.0 ...... PA Carbon, Luzerne, Bald Eagle Cr 1,500.0 Gathright Dam & Lk Moomaw F ...... 628.0 1,466.0 F VA Alleghany, Bath 8 27.1 ...... 1,411 1 Jackson R ...... 307.0 82.0 F 9 1,117.0 290.0 1,045.0 2,159 30.2 1,203.0 70.2 1,147 1,1 PL 657.0 79.9 630.0 1,610.0 3,450 1,582.0 1, 3,160 2,530

241

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00251 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR § 222.5 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–10 Edition)

3 Auth legis PL 80–858. PL 80–858. PL 85–500. 00 5,500 RHA 1910. RHA 00 5,500 630 470 PL 85–500. 74–738. PL PL 630 470 430 0 500 1,350 PL 78–534. PL 500 1,350 7,500 7,000 RHA 1930. RHA 7,500 7,000 0,800 8,300 PL 87–874. PL 0,800 8,300 Area in acres Upper Lower 11,810 11,000 RHA 1927. 1930. RHA 11,000 11,810 RHA 17,650 17,950 1930. RHA 12,680 12,000 0 422 83 PL 77–228. PL 0 422 83 2 5,430 4,430 FCA Dec 44. 0 24,800 3,580 PL 75–761. PL 0 24,800 3,580 0 97 0 PL 78–534. PL 0 97 0 1930. RHA 5 38,820 36,600 .0 190 176 FCA of 22 Dec 44. .7 255 140 RHA of 1882, 1885. 4.0 1,690 1,550 FCA 1958. FCA 4.0 1,690 1,550 1.0 385 0 PL 78–534. PL 1.0 385 0 73.0 3,340 1,200 PL 74–738. PL 73.0 3,340 1,200 586.7 926 0 PL 71–126. PL 586.7 926 0 644.5 8,870 8,000 RHA 1930. RHA 1930. 8,000 644.5 8,870 RHA 13,400 639.0 13,440 1,192.7 13,100 12,700 RHA 1899. RHA 12,700 1,192.7 13,100 630.0 20,800 20,000 RHA 1930. RHA 20,000 20,800 630.0 71–520. PL 20,000 21,100 602.0 538.0 300 250 PL 71–126. 538.0 PL 300 250 1 591.0 13,000 12,400 PL 71–520. PL 12,400 13,000 1 591.0 0 619.0 29,125 28,300 RHA 1930. RHA 28,300 29,125 0 619.0 71–520. PL 28,500 30,000 1 582.0 .0 610.0 17,070 16,500 RHA 1930. RHA 16,500 17,070 .0 610.0 M.S.L. Elev limits feet Upper Lower AF —Continued 1,000 Storage

2 ROJECTS P pose Project pur- C 40.3 680.0 652.0 3,580 0 PL 75–761. 150 8,300 PL 622.8 0 786.0 3,580 FR 514.0 652.0 680.0 C 40.3 IST OF

1 North Central Division § 222.5—L TO E Minnesota R ...... FC 11.1 952.3 947.3 2,790 910 FCA Oct 65. PPENDIX A Parle. WI LaCrosse ...... WI Vernon ...... IA Allamakee ...... WI Grant ...... State/county Stream State/county 1 Project name General Edgar Jadwin Dam ...... Prompton Dam & Res ...... PA Wayne ...... Raystown Lk PA Wayne ...... Dyberry Cr ...... PA Huntingdon W Br Lackawaxen R ...... Stillwater Lk F ...... F Raystown BrTioga-Hammond Lakes Hammond PA Susquehanna ...... Tioga-Hammond Lakes Tioga PA Tioga F Lackawanna R ...... Whitney Piont Lk ...... PA Tioga Crooked Cr F ...... York Indian Rock Dam ...... NY Broome ...... Tioga R F ...... PA York Otselic R ...... F Codorus Cr 24.5 F ...... 48.5 1,053.0 Badhill Dam & Res F ...... 1,205.0 248.0 Brandon Road L&D ...... ND Barnes 1,125.0 973.0 ...... Cedars L&D IL Will 812.0 ...... 11.6 Sheyenne RCoralville Dam & Res ...... WI Outagamie ...... Illinois R 1,621.0 ...... 910 54.2 659 786.0 ...... FM IA Johnson 1,572. Fox R 1,131.0 ...... N 52.5 Depree L&D 1 ...... 1,086.0 Iowa R 1,131.0 66.5 Dresden Island L&D N 290 ...... WI Brown 1,081.0 1,010.0 ...... 28.0 Eau Galle Dam & Res F 0 IL Grundy 1,770 ...... Fox RFarmdale Dam ...... 1, 9 WI Pierce ...... Illinois R 435.0 ...... Fondulac Dam N ...... IL Tazwell 680 Eau Galle R N ...... Gull Lk Dam & Res 68.6 370.0 ...... IL Tazwell ...... Farm Cr 1,266.0 Highway 75 Dam & Res FCR MN Cass ...... Fondulac Cr 1, 1,257. 8.0 ...... F MN Bigstone, Lacqui, Gull R ...... Homme Dam & Res F 1.8 ...... 439.0 539.0 N L&D 1 ND Walsh ...... 703.6 ...... 712.0 L&D 2 MN Hennepin, Ramsey ...... Park RL&D 3 ...... 9.4 698 MN Dakota, Wash ...... 680...... FM 1.0 Mississippi RL&D 4 1.6 ...... MN Goodhue, Pierce ...... Mississippi R 591.0 L&D 5 ...... N WI Wabasha, Buffalo ...... 505.0 940.0 Mississippi R ..... 11.3 ...... N L&D 5A ...... MN Winona, Buffalo Mississippi R ...... N ...... L&D 6 50 2.3 938.5 MN Winona, Buffalo ...... 70.4 616.0 ...... Mississippi R N L&D 7 ...... 1,194.0 MN Winona ...... Mississippi R ...... 579.0 1, ...... N 55 MN Winona Mississippi R ...... N ...... L&D 8 3.7 ...... 530. Mississippi R N ...... 1,080.0 MN Houston ...... 13.0 N L&D 9 1,074 ...... Mississippi R ...... 8.0 WI Crawford 725.1 17.8 ...... N L&D 10 ...... 18.0 Mississippi R 687.2 ...... 722.8 675.0 IA Clayton ...... N L&D 11 667.0 6.2 686.5 ...... 5,8 Mississippi R 674.0 L&D 12 ...... 7.2 IA Dubuque ...... 666...... 660.0 N 8.4 L&D 13 IA Jackson ...... Mississippi R 651.0 ...... 2.6 IL Whiteside 659.5 645.5 Mississippi R ...... N ...... 650.0 20.4 639.0 Mississippi R N ...... N 631.0 28.7 620. 16.8 611 19.1 12.2 603.1 24.2 592. 583.

242

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00252 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 222.5 A of 1937 1945. A Jun 36. 0 FCA of 22 Jun 36. 115 RHA of 1882 1885. ,600 RHA of 1937 1945. 4,000 FCA 1936. 4,000 FCA 68,500 62,000 RHA of 1899. 40 RHA of 1882 1895. 00 0 PL 74–738. PL 00 0 68 0 RHA 1885. RHA 68 0 80 0 PL 75–111. PL 80 0 171 1,040 RHA of 1882 1885. 400 8,000 PL 75–761. PL 400 8,000 3,700 12,000 RHA of 1899. 16,700 5,950 FCA 1936. FCA 16,700 5,950 288,800 287,300 FCA Dec 44. 12,400 10,950 FCA 1936. FCA 12,400 10,950 139,000 107,200 RHA of 1882 1895. 10,600 8,200 RHA of 1899. 1,400 0 PL 78–228. 1,400 PL 0 8 447 42.0 RHA of 1882 1885. 0 190 21 PL 86–45. PL 0 190 21 .3 13,900 13,000 RHA of 1899. .5 1,850 1,800 RHA 1930. RHA .9 .5 1,850 1,800 74 67 RHA of 1882 1885. 0.5 810 20 PL 78–534, 83–780. 82.8 1,400 1,320 PL 71–126. PL 82.8 1,400 1,320 69–100. PL 58.0 1,155 1,020 75–761. 15.0 3,200 PL 0 528.0 13,300 12,600 PL 71–520. PL 528.0 13,300 12,600 559.0 3,725 3,540 PL 71–520. PL 3,540 559.0 3,725 469.6 9,390 8,910 PL 71–520. 71–520. PL 73–184. PL 469.6 9,390 8,910 PL 459.1 8,660 8,230 10,500 10,500 429.0 77–228. 492.5 PL 530 200 544.0 13,000 12,400 PL 71–520. PL 12,400 13,000 544.0 71–520. PL 7,960 7,550 476.5 578.2 50 50 RHA of 1946. 1 536.0 7,580 7,200 PL 71–520. PL 1 536.0 7,580 7,200 8.2 517.2 33,500 31,800 PL 71–520. PL 31,800 33,500 8.2 517.2 2.1 571.0 10,500 9,980 PL 71–520. PL 10,500 9,980 2.1 571.0 40.0 440.0 27,800 27,800 PL 73–184. PL 27,800 27,800 40.0 440.0 R 72.0 728.0 690.0 8,000 0 PL 75–761. PL FCA. 0 8,000 0 5,950 690.0 810.0 728.0 R 72.0 836.0 P 90.0 New England Division SD Roberts. SD Roberts. L&D 14 ...... L&D 15 IA Scott ...... L&D 16 IL Rock Island ...... Mississippi RL&D 17 ...... IL Rock Island ...... Mississippi R ...... N L&D 18 IL Mercer ...... Mississippi R N ...... L&D 19 IL Henderson ...... Mississippi R ...... N L&D 20 ...... IA Lake ...... Mississippi R ...... N ...... L&D 21 MO Lewis ...... Mississippi R N L&D 22 ...... IL Adams ...... Mississippi R ...... N Lac qui Parle Dam & Res MO Polke ...... Mississippi R N Lagrange L&D ...... MN Chippewa Swift ...... Mississippi R ...... 9.0 ...... N Leech Lake Dam & Res IL Brown ...... Minnesota R 5.5 ...... N Little Kaukauna L&D ...... 12.1 MN Cass ...... 57 Illinois R ...... Little Chute L&D FC ...... WI Brown ...... 561.1 Leech R ...... 545.1 7.5 Lockport Lock N ...... WI Outagamie ...... 11.0 ...... Fox RLower Appleton L&D N ...... IL Will ...... Fox R 55.0 537...... N 529.1 Marseilles Lk & Dam WI Outagamie ...... Chicago San Ship Canal ...... 5.8 N Marsh Lake Dam & Res 51 IL LaSalle FNP ...... Fox R ...... 8.6 Menasha Dam Lk Winnebago 481.5 MN Swift, Lacqui, Parle Illinois R ...... 119.3 8.4 N ...... Mount Morris Dam WI Winnebago ...... 470.1 N ...... Minnesota RO’Brien L&D 941.1 NY Livingston ...... 459.6 ...... Fox R ...... Peoria L&D 0.0 300.2 ...... FC IL Cook ...... 931.2 Genesee R ...... 1,295.7 Pine Dam & Res FN IL Peoria ...... 429.0 Calumet ...... 13,500 1,293.2 3.6 Pokegama Dam & Res 2.7 F ...... MN Crow Wing ...... Illinois R 0.4 ...... Rapid Croche L&D ...... N MN Itasca ...... 6,40 601.0 Pine R 579.0 ...... N Red Lake Dam & Res ...... WI Outagamie ...... 694.2 ...... Mississippi R 0.2 N Red Rock Dam & Res ...... 592. MN Clearwater 577 ...... Fox R ...... 0.7 ...... 688 N 23.9 IA Marion 710.9 Red Lake R 452.0 N ...... Reservation Control Res ...... 483.0 Des Monies R FA 941.1 706.3 ...... 746.8 MN Traverse 337.4 ...... 4 Sandy Lake Dam & Res F ...... 937.6 743.5 760.0 Saylorville Dam & Res 0.3 MN Aitkin 181,120 ...... 43 ...... 0.0 1 8,650 IA Polk 40.4 585.0 Sandy R 581.9 FC ...... St Anthony Falls Lwr L&D ...... 1,230.3 52.4 4 ...... Des Moines R 5,150 1,810.0 N St Anthony Falls Upr L&D ...... 3,3 FC 1,227 1,274.4 MN Hennepin ...... 1,174.0 ...... 3.4 F Starved Rock L&D 1,270.3 MN Hennepin 1,670.0 ...... 1,173.5 Mississippi R ...... Upper Appleton L&D 1 IL LaSalle ...... 608.5 Mississippi R ...... N ...... Upper Kaukauna L&D 780.0 WI Outagamie ...... Illinois R ...... N White Rock Dam & Res 602.1 ...... WI Outagamie ...... Fox R ...... 728.0 58.8 N ...... MN Traverse Fox R ...... 65, N ...... Winnibigoshish Dam & Res 5 981.0 ...... 37.5 Bois De Souix N ...... 586.0 MN Cass Itasca 1,218.3 ...... FC 976.0 1,214.3 Mississippi R 890.0 ...... Ball Mountain Lk 0.0 N 836.0 ...... 17.4 Barre Fa

243

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00253 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR § 222.5 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–10 Edition)

3 79–525. Auth legis 74–738. 86–645. 75–111. PL 87–874. 87–874. L 85–500. PL 75–111. PL 90–483. 295 HD 544, PL 75–761. 200 PL 86–645. PL 200 0 PL 77–228. PL 0 40 PL 86–645. PL 40 0 21 PL 86–645. PL 0 21 00 19,850 RHA 1935. RHA 00 19,850 00 215 PL 75–761. PL 00 215 60 0 PL 78–534. PL 60 0 77–228. PL 13 23 960 0 PL 75–761. PL 960 0 900 130 PL 75–761. PL 900 130 970 260 PL 75–761. PL 970 260 ,700 220 PL 75–761. PL ,700 220 1,185 750 PL 86–645. PL 1,185 750 1,880 200 PL 77–228. PL 1,880 200 5,000 86,000 PL 81–516. PL 5,000 86,000 Area in acres Upper Lower 0 735 95 PL 78–534, 83–780. .0 1,025 0 PL 78–534. .0 1,025 PL 0 .0 130 98 HD 544, PL 75–761, .0 1,200 100 PL 75–761. PL .0 1,200 100 01.0 374 70 PL 83–780. PL 01.0 374 70 36.0 1,130 78 PL 75–761. 36.0 1,130 PL 78 500.0 67 7 PL 86–645. PL 500.0 67 7 1,854.0 988 221 FCA 1962, PL 87–874, 0.0 0 0 PL 86–645. PL 0.0 0 0 .0 1,350.0 975 531. HD 940 M.S.L. Elev limits feet Upper Lower AF —Continued 1,000 Storage

2 ROJECTS P pose Project pur- FNI 78.8 1,350.0 1,180.0 940 133 PL 81–516. PL 133 940 1,180.0 1,350.0 FNI 78.8 IST OF

1 North Pacific Division § 222.5—L TO E Quinebaug R ...... F 29.9 653.0 Middle Br, Westfield R ... F 632.0 2,300 360 PL 77–228. 23.0 576.0 518.0 510 275 PL 85–500. PPENDIX A ter. shire. MA Bekshire ...... Farmington R. State/county Stream State/county 1 Project name Colebrook River Lk ...... CT Litchfield ...... Conant Brook Dam ...... West BranchEast Brimfield Lk ...... MA Hampden ...... F MA Hampden, Worces- Conant Brook ...... Edward MacDowell Lk ...... F Everett Lk ...... NH HIllsboro ...... Franklin Falls Dam NH Hillsboro, Merrimack ...... Nubanusit BrookHancock Brook Lk Piscataquog R ...... NH Belknap, Merrimack ...... Hodges Village Dam F CT Litchfield ...... F Pemigewasset RHop Brook Lk ...... MA Worcester ...... Hancock Brook ...... 50.2 Hopkinton Lk ...... F CT New Haven ...... French R ...... F Knightville Dam ...... NH Merrimack ...... 761.0 ...... Hop BrookLittleville Lk F ...... 3.7 MA Hampshire ...... Contoocook R ...... F ...... 708.0 MA Hampden, Hamp- Westfield R 757.0 F Mansfield Hollow Lk ...... 12.8 New Bedford-Fairhaven Hurr Barrier F CT Tolland .. 91.5 694.0 ...... North Hartland Lk MA Bristol 150.6 ...... 946.0 Natchaug R ...... North Springfield Lk 418.0 VT Windsor ...... 158 ...... F 389.0 Northfield Br Lk 3.9 911.0 VT Windsor ...... Ottauquechee R 340.0 13.3 F ...... Otter Br Lk ...... CT Litchfield 307.0 ...... Black R 484.0 F Stamford Hurr Barrier ...... 6.9 2, 501.0 NH Cheshire 840 ...... Northfield Br 70.1 ...... Surry Mountain Lk 0 F 2,800 ...... 460.0 CT Fairfield PL 49.0 364.0 Otter Brook F ...... 465.5 Thomaston Dam 416.0 NH Cheshire ...... 165 ...... Townshend Lk F ...... 610.0 310.0 CT Litchfield 440 Ashuelot R 266 ...... F 380.0 PL Tully Lk ...... VT Windham 740 ...... 49.2 ...... Naugatuck R F 480.0 Union Village Dam ...... MA Worcester ...... 3 West R ...... 27 ...... 0.0 F West Hill Dam 257.0 VT Orange ...... East Br Tully R 68.8 ...... F West Thomspon ...... MA Worcester ...... Ompompanoosuc R ...... 50.0 205.5 F Westville Lake ...... CT Windham 546.5 ...... 0.0 ...... West R F ...... 2.4 MA Worcester 545.5 Quinebaug R ...... 17.6 425.0 F ...... Quinebaug R 576.0 F 467 0.0 0.0 ...... 781.0 1,1 31.7 Albeni Falls Dam, Lk Pend, Oreille F .... 42.0 Applegate Lk 7 550.0 ...... ID Bonner 32.9 0.0 ...... OR Jackson 494.0 0 20.5 ...... Pend Oreille R 500.0 Big Cliff Dam 553.0 ...... Applegate R 38.0 380.0 ...... FNP OR Marion, Linn 668.0 12.4 ...... 478. FIR Blue River Lk 564.0 ...... N Santiam R 25.6 0 6 ...... P 9 264.0 OR Lane 11.0 ...... 420.0 Bonneville L&D Lk P 342.5 ...... Blue R 234 Chena River Lakes ...... WA Skamania 572.0 ...... 1,155.0 ...... Chief Joseph Dam Rufus Woods Lk 305.0 F 740 2,062.5 AK North Star Burough .. Columbia RCottage Grove Lk 525.0 ...... 2,049.7 ...... WA Douglas, Okanogan 1,250 75.2 NP Chena R OR Lane 9 Columbia R ...... 1,987.0 ...... 9 F 0 Coast Fk, Willamete R P PL .. F 3.5 1,206.0 1,182 6.5 138.0 1,357 77.0 192.3 34.0 956.0 70.0 29.8 506.7 20,8 930.0 791.0 490.0 8,400 750.0 5,400 6,800 1,155 HD 693, PL 400

244

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00254 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 222.5 601, PL 93–251. HD 704, PL 79–14. 0 RHA 1935. 0 RHA 1935. 0 RHA ,000 HD 704, PL 79–14. 2,000 HD 531. 2,000 HD ...... 9,050 HD 403, PL 87–874. 8,540 HD 704, PL 79–14. 0 1,860 HD 544. HD 0 1,860 63 0 PL 74–738. PL 63 0 200 10,350 HD 531, PL 81–516. 990 940 HD 544, PL 75–761. 3,705 3,605 HD 531. HD 3,705 3,605 1,260 1,195 HD 544 HD 1,260 1,195 0 1,750 763 HD 531. HD 0 1,750 763 0 2,850 2,710 HD 531. HD 0 2,850 2,710 5 10,305 9,340 HD 544. HD 5 10,305 9,340 .0 46,365 14,391 HD 531, PL 81–516. .0 1,865 1,760 HD 531. HD 1,760 .0 1,865 5.0 2,817 2,745 PL 79–526. PL 5.0 2,817 2,745 5.0 225 53 HD 578, PL 75–761. 047.0 269 96 PL 89–298. PL 047.0 269 96 832.0 1,885 1,815 HD 544. HD 832.0 1,885 1,815 0 1,563.0 3,490 3,455 HD 544, PL 75–761. .0 1,690.0 531. 1,280 HD 1,235 .0 1,751.0 3,430 1,800 HD 566, PL 87–874. P 9.9 1,532.0 1,516.0 635 602 PL 83–870. PL 81–516. 602 75–761. PL 1,415 635 PL 81–516 635 1,725 1,516.0 1,725 1,235 86–645 520 81–516. PL 3,455 1,532.0 1,425.0 1,815 1,532.0 81–516. 1,450.0 PL 460 1,690.0 PL 1,450.0 770.5 1,760 1,563.5 PL FNPI 143.9 81–516. 895 P 9.9 728.0 13 832.0 FNPI 281.6 1,195 P 40.3 1,575 PL 42,000 763 830.0 613.0 FNI 65.0 2,710 49,000 1,040.0 FNI 107.5 1,448.0 637.0 49,000 FNI 52,000 75–761 FNPI 24.9 1,541.0 1,141.0 802 PL 257.0 FNPI 93.9 373.5 353.0 9,340 1,515 262.0 FNPI 194.6 2,817 FA 25.6 262.0 265.0 249.9 1,010.0 2,905.0 992.0 FNP 150.0 3,605 F 192.0 2,072 PL 81–516, 83–780. 3,055.0 FNPI 75–761. PL 2,090 825.0 4,255 324.2 926.0 FI 264.4 Ohio River Division Snake R ...... NP 24.9 440.0 437.0 8,370 Snake R ...... 8,210 HD 704, PL 79–14. NP 20.0 540.0 537.0 6,700 6,550 HD 704, PL 79–14. lin. lin. OR Umatilla ...... OR Wasco ...... Cougar Lk ...... OR Lane ...... South FkDetroit Lk ...... F OR Marion ...... North Santiam ...... Dexter Dam ...... F Dorena Lk OR Lane ...... OR Lane Middle Fk, Willamette R ...... Dworshak Dam and Res ...... FNPI Cow RFall Cr Dam and Lk ...... ID Clearwater ...... 11.3 F OR Lane North Fk, Clearwater R 1,699 ...... Fern Ridge Lk ...... Fall Cr FNP ...... OR Lane 19.1 ...... Foster Lake F 1,569...... Long Tom R ...... OR Linn 4.8 ...... F Green Peter Lk ...... South Santiam R 695.0 ...... 2,016.0 OR Linn ...... Hills Creek Lk F 5.5 1,600.0 ...... 690.0 Middle Fk, Santiam R 1,445.0 .... OR Lane ...... 835.0 Howard Hanson Dam F 17,090 ...... Middle Fk, Willamette R 7.5 WA King F ...... Ice Harbor Dam Lk Sacajawea ...... 15.7 Green R 834.0 ...... WA Walla, Frank- F John Day Dam Lk Umatilla 375.1 ...... 830 4.9 OR Sherman ...... 373. Columbia R 18.3 641.0 ...... Libby Dam Lk Koocanusa ...... 1,015.0 F Little Goose L&D Lk Bryan MT Lincoln 637.0 ...... 1,010.0 ...... 5.6 Lookout Point Lk WA Columbia, Whitman ...... Kootenai R 1,543.0 ...... OR Lane Snake R 1,541. 80.0 ...... FP Lost Creek Lk ...... 1,206.0 PN Middle Fk, Willamette R Lower Granite L&D OR Jackson 1,141...... P Lucky Peak Dam and Lk WA Garfield, Whitman ...... Rogue R ... 158.0 ...... ID Ada Snake R ...... FPIR Lwr Monumental L&D Lk HG West ...... 268.0 Boise R 4,979.5 NPI ...... WA Walla, Frank- 2,459.0 F McNary L&D, Dam Lk Wallula 265.0 ...... 2,287 49.0 55,000 WA Benton ...... Mill Creek Dam Lk 638.0 5 12.2 ...... 315.0 Columbia RMud Mountain Dam ...... WA Walla, Walla ...... 1,872 ...... 633.0 825.0 NP The Dalles L&D Lk Celilo WA King, Pierce ...... Mill Cr 43.6 ...... 10,030 ...... WA Klickitat 819.0 White R ...... Willow Creek Lk F ...... 738.0 ...... 9,620 13.9 Columbia RWynoochee Dam and Lk F 2,09 ...... OR Morrow 3,060.0 ...... 733.0 NP 3,05 WA Grays, Harbor Willow Cr ...... 8,900 185.0 Wynoochee R F ...... Allegheny L&D 2 FMCA 340.0 ...... Allegheny L&D 3 PA Allegheny ...... 335.0 7.5 PA Allegheny 106.3 Allegheny R ...... 38,800 ...... 1,265.0 52.5 1,215.0 Allegheny R 36 1,20 N ...... 160.0 895.0 65.4 N 11.6 155.0 800.0 2,113.5 9 11, 2, 700.0 1,170 0.0 193 0.0 HD 721.0 734.5 710.0 721.0 0 0

245

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00255 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR § 222.5 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–10 Edition)

3 Auth legis RHA 1912 RHA 1912. RHA 1912. RHA RHA 1912, 1935. 1935. RHA ...... 57,920 PL 79–525. PL 57,920 ...... 180 12,080 PL 74–738. PL 180 12,080 500 0 PW 1933. PW 500 0 3,610 1,230 PL 75–761. PL 3,610 1,230 Area in acres Upper Lower 6,150 420 PW 1933. PW 6,150 420 2,460 1,540 PW 1933. PW 1,540 2,460 87–874. PL 1,847 725 7 5,500 3,590 PL 75–761. PL 3,590 7 5,500 0 5,260 2,430 PL 75–761. PL 2,430 0 5,260 75–761. PL 0 1,902 965 1909 RHA 0 .0 20,150 10,000 PL 75–261. PL .0 20,150 10,000 .0 2,720 2,120 PL 87–874. PL 2,120 .0 2,720 1.0 3,910 2,060 PL 75–761 PL 75–761. 1.0 3,910 2,060 PL 9.0 6,110 2,830 88.0 4,852 3,387 PL 87–874. PL 88.0 4,852 3,387 1909. RHA 0 60.0 0 ,410.0 9,180 2,040 PL 74–738. PL ,410.0 9,180 2,040 M.S.L. 4.0 636.0 4,840 1,400 PL 75–761. PL 4,840 1,400 4.0 636.0 ,055.0 1027.0 1,120 710 PL 87–874. ,055.0 1027.0 1,120 PL 710 Elev limits feet Upper Lower AF —Continued 1,000 Storage

2 ROJECTS P pose Project pur- FCR 7.5 1,410.0 1,406.0 2,040 1,800 PL 75–761. 45,210 1,900 3,105 0 12,080 3,387 45,210 57,920 1,240.0 PL 4,340 885.0 460 1,328.0 354.0 233.0 10,000 888.0 FPCAR 549.0 1,800 725 359.0 FMCR 79.2 525.0 354.0 FCR 583.5 2,040 2,200 552.0 550 FP 259.0 N 610.0 3,590 1,540 1,250 7.6 928.0 922.5 592.0 1,406.0 FMR 190.3 1,230 1,016.5 FCR 1,100 FCR 5.0 553 1,024.7 1,410.0 757.0 0.0 420 0 965 2,060 FMCAR 56.6 700 776.0 782.0 FCR 7.5 530 640.0 2,830 789.0 710 FR 21.8 800.0 661.0 FCAR 10.2 1009.0 849.0 FAR 33.1 FMAR 88.7 1,027.0 FAR 10.8 IST OF

1 § 222.5—L TO E Allegheny R ...... N 0.0 745.0 734.5 0 0 RHA 1912. PPENDIX A land. OH Meigs ...... IN Perry ...... State/county Stream State/county 1 Project name Allegheny L&D 4 ...... PA Allegheny Westmore- Allegheny L&D 5 ...... Allegheny L&D 6 PA Armstrong ...... Allegheny L&D 7 PA Armstrong ...... Allegheny R ...... Allegheny L&D 8 ...... PA Armstrong ...... Allegheny R ...... Allegheny L&D 9 N ...... PA Armstrong ...... Allegheny R ...... Allegheny Res Kinzua Dam N ...... PA Armstrong ...... Allegheny R ...... N ...... PA Warren ...... Allegheny RAlum Cr Lk N ...... Allegheny R ...... N OH Delaware ...... Atwood Lk F ...... Alum Cr ...... OH Tuscarawas ...... Barkley Dam Lk F 0.0 ...... Indian Fk Cr ...... 0.0 Ky Lyon, Livgst ...... 756.8 F 0.0 Cumberland RBarren River Lk 769.0 ...... 0.0 745.0 782.1 F KY Allen, Barren 0.0 607.0 756.8 ...... Beach City Lk 800.0 1,365.0 ...... Barren R 769.0 822.0 ...... 1,328.0 OH Tuscarawas 782.1 ...... 53.1 0 Beech Fk Lk F 21, ...... Sugar Cr 800.0 0 ...... WV Wayne 901.0 ...... 26.1 F 0 Belleville L&D ...... Beech Fk Cr 1,213.0 0 8 ...... 0 WV Wood 941.0 ...... 0 F Berlin Lk 0 375.0 ...... Ohio R 928.0 0 ...... OH Mahoning, Portage .. 359.0 Bluestone Lk N 558.8 0 ...... Mahoning R ...... 93,430 0 WV Summers 590.0 ...... F Bolivar Dam ...... 69.9 New RBrookville Lk ...... OH Stark, Tuscarawas 552 ..Buckhorn Lk F IN Franklin 976.5 ...... 28.3 ...... Sandy Cr ...... KY Leslie E Fork of Whitewater R ...... 948.0 Burnsville Lk F 614.5 ...... Middle Fk of Kentucky R FMR WV Braxton 0.0 F ...... 592.0 CJ Brown Dam & Res ...... L Kanawha R 38.3 582.0 CM Harden Lk ...... OH Clark 1,032.0 ...... F IN Parke 592.6 1,024. 5 ...... Buck CrCaesar Cr Lk ...... 1,520.0 ...... Raccoon Cr ...... F 128.4 1 OH Warren 149.6 F ...... Cagles Mill Lk ...... 748.0 Caesar Cr 135.8 962.0 Cannelton L&D ...... IN Putman ...... F KY Hancock 713. 840.0 895.0 ...... Mill CrCarr Fk Lk ...... Ohio R 51.5 782.0 ...... F 6, KY Knott ...... N 825.0 26.8 Carr Cr ...... 83.5 1,023.0 789. F 1,012 690.0 140.2 66 883.0 201.0 84 70 0.0 383.0 25.1 1 358.

246

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00256 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 222.5 A 1950. PL 75–761. 0 RHA 1888. 0 RHA ,630 RHA 1946, PL 396...... 0 0 RHA 1888. RHA 0 0 9,820 RHA 1946. RHA 0 9,820 ,351 1,005 PL 75–761. PL ,351 1,005 ,100 0 PW 1933. PW ,100 0 1,940 350 PL 74–738, 75–761. 0 0 RHA 1909. RHA 0 1909. RHA 0 0 8,550 1,270 PL 75–761 PL 0 8,550 1,270 0 0 0 RHA 1909. RHA 0 2.0 0 0 RHA 1909. RHA 2.0 0 0.0 1,370 1,160 PL 78–526. PL 1,160 0.0 1,370 8.0 2,620 1,800 PW 1933. PW 1,800 8.0 2,620 1935. RHA 0 5.0 0 10.0 4,046 1,277 PL 75–761. PL 10.0 4,046 1,277 730.0 14,870 8,270 PL 74–738 PL 730.0 14,870 8,270 749.0 7,900 900 PL 85–500. PL 749.0 7,900 900 997.0 6,050 1,350 PW 1933. PW 6,050 1,350 997.0 648.0 23,060 18,220 PL 75–761. PL 18,220 23,060 648.0 75–761. PL 10,280 1,560 737.0 86–645. PL 3,633 1,509 645.0 75–761. PL 19,100 8,210 675.0 0 651.0 30,990 27,700 PL 75–761. PL 27,700 30,990 0 651.0 75–761 PL 3,340 1,100 0 650.0 25.0 757.0 2,681 1,131 PL 75–761. PL 2,681 1,131 25.0 757.0 N 84.2 382.0 345.0 5,630 0 PL 396. PL 14,590 6,790 827 0 18,220 8,270 5,630 1,350 720.0 618.0 0 993.0 21,880 345.0 730.0 648.0 9,820 997.0 FAR 75.3 27,700 382.0 P 492.0 424.0 727 FCR 4.5 880 950 631.0 N 84.2 1,277 499.0 FCR 1,270 1,100 796.0 651.0 NR 0.0 1,800 1,430 8.0 898.0 893.0 910.0 920 645.0 810.0 823 P 496.0 1,160 915.0 650.0 FCR 14.6 1,005 1,651.0 820 FCAR 5.6 2,160 569 FCR 4.9 656.0 1,670.0 683.0 FCR 1,131 733.0 6,650 662.0 FCAR 19.8 725.0 1,560 1,330 4.4 737.0 734.0 FMCAR 73.6 8,210 757.0 FCR 5.5 FCAR 27.2 664.0 FCAR 675.0 1,509 1,159 10.7 645.0 637.0 FAR 81.5 Conemaugh R ...... F 270.0 975.0 880.0 6,820 300 PL 74–738, 75–761. land. OH Gallia ...... OH Scioto ...... OH Monroe ...... Cave Run Lk ...... KY Rowan ...... Center Hill Lk ...... Licking R ...... TN Dekalb ...... F Charles Mill Lk ...... Caney FK ...... OH Ashland ...... F Cheatham L&D ...... Black Fk ...... TN Cheatham ...... Clendening Lk F ...... Cumberland R OH Harrison ...... Conemaugh River Lk 391.5 P ...... Brush Fk ...... PA Indiana, Westmore- 765.0 F Cordell Hull Dam & Res 762.0 ...... TN Smith 685.0 ...... Crooked Cr Lk ...... Cumberland R 80.6 Dale Hollow Lk ...... PA Armstrong ...... 1,020.0 ...... PR TN Clay Crooked Cr ...... 19.8 Dashields L&D ...... Obey R F Deer Cr Lk ...... PA Allegheny 385.0 ...... 27.5 ...... F OH Pickaway Ohio R ...... Delaware Lk 382.0 910.5 ...... Deer Cr N ...... OH Delaware 7,450 89 ...... Dewey Lk 17.8 F ...... Olentangy R ...... 5 KY Floyd 504.5 ...... F Dillon Lk ...... 89.4 Johns Cr 353.0 ...... 499.0 OH Muskingum ...... Dover Dam F 920.0 12,20 ...... Licking R 663. E Br Clarion River Lake ...... OH Tuscarawas ...... 840.0 F 0.0 PA Elk Tuscarawas R ...... 81.5 ...... E Fk Res Wm H Harsha Lk ...... E Br Clarion R 692.0 F 118.0 ...... 844.0 OH Clermont ...... F East Lynn Lk 682...... E Fk Little Miami R 947.0 8 ...... WV Wayne ...... 76.1 F Emsworth L&D 915...... E Fk Twelvepole ...... Fishtrap Lk 256.5 686. PA Allegheny ...... F KY Pike Ohio R 790.0 ...... 203.0 Gallipolis L&D ...... Levisa Fk N ...... WV Mason 916.0 19.0 ...... Grayson Lk F ...... 1,685.0 Ohio R 202.2 858.0 KY Carter ...... 1,67 ...... Green R L&D 1 N 10 ...... L Sandy R 795.0 ...... Green R L&D 2 KY Henderson ...... 65.3 F ...... Green River Lk 733.0 KY McLean ...... Green R ...... 701.0 ...... KY Taylor ...... Green R 4,600 Greenup L&D 3 N 0.0 ...... 126.7 ...... Green R 662.0 ...... N KY Greenup 2,160 ...... 710.0 8 F Hannibal L&D 2 ...... Ohio R ...... 0.0 692.0 WV Wetzel ...... N Hildebrand L&D ...... 89.6 Ohio R 538.0 Huntington Lk ...... WV Monongalia ...... 681.0 N IN Hunt 51 Monongahela ...... 0.0 ...... Wabash R N 0.0 479.1 ...... 349.1 F 363.4 713.0 337.3 0.0 349.1 515.0 0.0 0 485.0 623.0 0.0 140.6 60 835.0 798.0 814.0 0 0 RH

247

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00257 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR § 222.5 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–10 Edition)

3 50, 1973. . . . Auth legis 1879. 1879. PL–74–738 RHA 1930. RHA 1930. RHA 0 RHA 1879. 0 RHA 1,143 PL 75–761. PL 1,143 0 RHA 1879. RHA 0 210 PL 74–738. PL 210 0 0 PW 1933. PW 0 20 14,400 PL 75–761. PL 20 14,400 Area in acres Upper Lower 2,370 280 PL 74–738. PL 2,370 280 0 578 340 PL 89–298. PL 0 578 340 0 0 0 RHA 1909 RHA 0 85–500. PL 0 12,830 3,180 .0 0 0 RHA 1909. RHA .0 0 5.0 0 0 RHA 1909. RHA 5.0 0 1933. 2.0 8,800 PW 0 63.0 1,470 1,000 PW 1933. PW 1,000 63.0 1,470 982.0 6,060 4,200 PL 86–645. PL 982.0 6,060 4,200 M.S.L. 56.0 538.0 18,450 10,750 FCA 1958. FCA 10,750 18,450 56.0 538.0 Elev limits feet Upper Lower AF —Continued 1,000 Storage

2 ROJECTS P pose Project pur- FR 8.4 749.0 737.0 900 500 14,000 10,570 11,630 900 14,400 11,630 14,000 737.0 75–761. 310 489.5 480.0 483.0 749.0 1,143 0 75–761. 829 490.5 PL 1,380.0 4,200 489.5 483.0 FR 8.4 1,000 FP 15.0 PL 1,396.0 760.0 FPR 0.0 170 PR 0.0 957.0 0 FMCR 16.5 570 280 982.0 274 2,650 963.0 274 . 1,075.0 R 250.6 340 951.0 FCR 5.5 1,265.0 985.5 1,300.0 1,098.0 1,280 FC 75–761. FCAR 52.9 PL 3,180 1,300.0 1,310.0 0.0 FRC 5.1 0 0 712.0 FAR 3.1 R 3.7 737.0 FR 51.9 IST OF

1 § 222.5—L TO E Monongahela R ...... N 0.0 743.5 726.9 0 0 RHA 1909. PPENDIX A moreland. KY Gallatin ...... IN Clark ...... OH Clermont ...... State/county Stream State/county 1 Project name J Percy Priest Dam & Res ...... TN Davidson ...... Stones R ...... F JW Flannagan Dam & Res ...... VA Dickenson ...... Kentucky R L&D 1 ...... Pound RKentucky R L&D 2 ...... KY Carroll ...... F Kentucky R L&D 3 KY Henry Owen ...... Kentucky RKentucky R L&D 4 ...... KY Henry Owen ...... Kentucky R ...... Laurel River Lk ...... 252.0 N ...... KY Franklin Kentucky R ...... N ...... KY Laurel, Whitley ...... Kentucky R 504.5 Leesvillie Lake N ...... Laurel R ...... N OH Carroll 490.5 ...... P London L&D ...... 22,7 McGuire Cr. 78.6 Loyalhanna Lk ...... WV Kanawha 1,446.0 ...... F PA Westmoreland 1,396.0 ...... Kanawha RM J Kirwan Dam & Res ...... 0.0 ...... Loyalhanna Cr ...... N 2,098 0.0 OH Portage ...... F Mahoning Cr Lk 430.0 0.0 ...... W. Br Mahoning R 444.0 ...... 185.0 0.0 PA Armstrong 421.8 457.1 F ...... Markland L&D 1,018.5 430.0 ...... Mahoning Cr 470.4 ...... IN Switzerland 444.0 17.9 ...... Marmet L&D F ...... 457.1 Ohio R 0 Martins Fk Lk WV Kanawha R ...... 977.5 ...... 0 0.0 N KY Harlan 93.3 Kanawha 0 ...... 9 614.0 Martins Fk of Clover R 0 N Maxwell L&D 975.0 ...... 22.0 McAlpine L&D 0 F 590.0 PA Fayette Washington ...... RHA 910.0 0 993.0 KY Jefferson RHA ...... Monongahela R 64.7 Meldahl L&D ...... 3,280 ...... Ohio R 1,162.0 985.5 N ...... KY Bracken 0 1,098.0 ...... Mississinewa Lk N 0.0 3,240 ...... Ohio R ...... IN Miami ...... 455.0 Mohawk Dam 0.0 2,650 N ...... MIssissinewa R 14.3 0 Mohicanville Dam ...... OH Coshocton 420. 590.0 1,341.0 ...... Monongahela R L&D 2 F OH Ashland ...... 1,310. Walhonding R ...... Monongahela R L&D 3 ...... 566.0 PA Allegheny ...... Lk Fork ...... Monongahela R L&R 4 F 0.0 PA Allegheny ...... Monongahela R ...... F ...... 0.0 PA Washington West- Monongahela R 763.0 Monongahela R L&D 7 N ...... 0 420.0 Monongahela R L&D 8 N 0.0 PA Greene, Fayette ...... 743.5 ...... Monroe Lk 293.2 PA Greene, Fayette ...... 383 Monongahela R ...... 485.0 ...... IN Monroe Monongahela R ...... 0 779.0 N ...... 285.0 45 Salt Cr 0 ...... N 102.0 737. 890.0 F 963.0 0.0 799.2 0 0.0 93 RHA 1909 718.7 7,95 726.9 710.0 0.0 718.7 258.8 0.0 778.0 5 0 797.0 763.0 0 778.0 0 RHA 1902 0 0 RHA 1905 0 0 RHA 1922. 0 RHA 1922, 19

248

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00258 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 222.5 50. A 1909. RHA 1909. 54 PL 87–874. 54 PL 50 RHA 1946. 50 RHA 1909. 0 RHA 1909. RHA 0 0 RHA 1909, 1910, 1918. 260 5,100 PL 75–761. PL 260 5,100 ,850 630 PL 87–874. PL ,850 630 1,090 3,560 PL 75–761. PL 1,090 3,560 8,900 7,850 PL 75–761. PL 8,900 7,850 5,170 3,550 PW 1933. PW 3,550 5,170 0 9,340 2,860 PL 85–500. PL 0 9,340 2,860 .0 0 0 RHA 1909. RHA .0 0 3.0 0 0 RHA 1909. RHA 1909. 3.0 0 RHA 8.0 0 1.0 349 154 PL 86–645. PL 154 1.0 349 6.6 0 0 RHA 1909, 1910, 1918. 98.0 4,761 1,190 PL 75–761. PL 98.0 4,761 1,190 13.0 3,170 2,310 PW 1933. PW 2,310 13.0 3,170 ,1652.0 4,913 2,790 PL 75–761. PL ,1652.0 4,913 2,790 1,020.0 2,600 1933. PW 850 0 709.0 1,867 1,139 PL 89–298. PL 0 709.0 1,867 1,139 .0 536.0 11,300 8,880 PL 89–298. PL 11,300 8,880 .0 536.0 .0 515.0 14,530 5,790 PL 75–761. PL 14,530 5,790 .0 515.0 FMA 159.9 538.0 515.0 10,750 3,280 . 3,280 . 10,750 515.0 106 7,220 154 538.0 7,850 1,601.0 899.9 FMA 159.9 901.4 0 1,611.0 FMCAR 80.4 19,550 FMCR 1.3 375.0 261 770 FR 1,139 1,190 442.0 627 5,790 2,890 106.4 515.0 490.0 787.5 650.0 850 N 357.0 798.0 709.0 440 FMCAR 11.4 1,012.5 976 630 FCAR 36.3 FMCAR 1,012.0 2,860 2,912 1,020.0 FCR 2,010 506.0 8,880 167.3 536.0 1,035.0 3,550 730.0 FCR 5.5 2,310 1,987 8.6 913.0 909.0 FCAR 12.2 828.2 755.0 514 832.2 2,790 FR 47.6 1,535.0 FCR 12.8 FCAR 1,652.0 3,560 1,910 29.9 896.0 885.0 FRCA 161.8 N ...... 0.0 814.0 797.0 0 0 RHA 0 0 797.0 N ...... 0.0 814.0 Monongahela R. OH Jefferson ...... IN Warrick ...... IL Massac ...... IL Pulaski ...... OH Belmont ...... 2,180 OH Meigs ...... Ridge ...... 5,100 470.0 IL Pope495.0 ...... FMR 90.2 Montgomery Island L&D ...... Morgantown L&D PA Beaver ...... WV Monongalia Ohio RMosquito Cr Lk ...... OH Trumbull N ...... N Br Kokosing River Lk ...... Mosquito CrN Fk Pound Lk ...... OH Knox ...... F VA Wise ...... North Br of Kokosing RNew Cumberland L&D ...... N Fk Pound R ...... WV Hancock F ...... F Newburgh L&D ...... Ohio R ...... KY Henderson 0.0 ...... Nolin Lk N ...... Ohio R 682.0 ...... KY Edmonson ...... 21.7 Ohio R L&D 52 N 664.5 ...... Nolin R ...... 904.0 KY McCracken ...... F 13.9 Ohio R L&D 53 ...... Ohio R 1,146.0 901.4 8.0 ...... KY Ballard 1,121.0 ...... 0 1,644.0 Old Hickory L&D N ...... Ohio R 1,61 0.0 ...... 1,140 TN Davidson Sumner ....Opekiska L&D N ...... 664.5 Cumberland RPaint Cr Lk 0.0 0 ...... WV Monongahela ...... 1 ...... 439.2 P 644.0 OH Ross, Highland 358.0 Monongahela R ...... Paintsville Lk ...... Paint Cr 560 ...... N 342.0 KY Johnson F ...... Patoka Lk 0.0 ...... 0 Paint Cr ...... IN DuBois 302.0 ...... F Piedmont Lk 0.0 ...... 0 Patoka R ...... 290.0 OH Harrison 290.0 ...... 63.0 0 Pike Island L&D F RH ...... Stillwater Cr ...... 27 445.0 WV Ohio ...... 124.7 F Pleasant Hill Lk 0.0 ...... 0 Ohio R 442.0 ...... OH Ashland 845.0 857.0 ...... 22,500 R D Bailey Lk N ...... 32.8 Clear Fk 19,5 7 ...... 835.0 WV Mingo, Wyoming .....Racine L&D F 731. 121.1 ...... Guyandot R ...... WV Mason ...... 548 F Rough River Lk ...... 0 32.2 Ohio R ...... Grayson, Breckinridge ...Salamonie Lk N 924.6 ...... Rough R 0.0 ...... IN Wabash 0 9 ...... Senecaville Lk F RHA 19 ...... 74.2 Salamonie R 644.0 ...... OH Guernsey 1,065.0 ...... F Shenango River Lk 169.5 62 ...... Seneca Fk 1,155.0 ...... PA Mercer ...... 1,035.0 F Smithland L&D ...... Shenango R ...... 0.0 KY Livingston 2 ...... F Summersville Lk 214.4 ...... Ohio R 560.0 ...... WV Nicholas ...... 524.0 N 202.9 53 Gauley R ...... 495.0 793.0 F 10, 45.1 755. 151.0 842.5 919.0 832.2 0.0 896.0 221.9 1 324.0 1,710.0 1 302

249

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00259 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR § 222.5 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–10 Edition)

3 Auth legis –526. 1944. 79–525. 60–317. 79–525. PL 79–14. 3 PL 79–525. 3 PL 79–14. 0 PL 945 PL 79–525. 945 PL ,820 22,442 38,542 0 RHA 1935. RHA 0 0 0 RHA 1909. RHA 0 1 13,942 PL 88–253. PL 1 13,942 00 71,100 PL 78–534. PL 00 71,100 880 3,275 PL 79–14. PL 880 3,275 570 2,840 FCA 1938. FCA 570 2,840 775 325 FCA 1962. FCA 775 325 ,201 11,862 PL 77–228. PL ,201 11,862 Area in acres 47,182 38,542 Upper Lower .0 0 0 RHA 1909. RHA .0 0 99.3 3,100 2,350 PW 1933. PW 99.3 3,100 2,350 1,071.0 1,035.0 .0 1,210.0 2,290 87–874. PL 0 M.S.L. 0.0 1,085.0 2,770 480 PL 74–738. 75–761. 67.0 1,094.0 1934. 3,430 PWA 1,740 Elev limits feet 1,085.0 1,071.0 Upper Lower 925.0 850.0 1,520 270 PL 75–761. PL 850.0 1,520 925.0 270 598.8 AF —Continued 1,000 1,087.6 Storage

2 ROJECTS P pose Project pur- PNMR FRM 5.8 721.0 710.0 664 394 PL 78–534. 1933. PL 1,960 394 PW 2,350 75–761. 664 894.0 900 620 710.0 PL 1,740 899.3 11,450 1,010.0 721.0 FCR 11.4 50,250 1,094.0 742.0 FRM 5.8 100 FMACR 99.9 63,530 325 779.0 2,300 723.0 1,162.5 2,840 F 190.0 760.0 CR 1,419.0 1,181.0 F 2,094.0 3,251 1,439.0 0.0 0 2,196 FCAR 5.0 0 11,862 FCAR 149.3 6,658 3,275 800.0 13,942 840.0 202.0 1,022.0 216.0 PMAR 284.6 FMCAR 140.4 1,074.0 PRA 41.4 IST OF

1 South Atlantic Division § 222.5—L TO E PPENDIX A Muskingum. IN Posey ...... OH Washington ...... SC McCormick ...... FP 1,045.0 330.0 312.0 71,100 45,000 State/county Stream State/county 1 Project name Sutton Lk ...... Tappan Lk WV Braxton ...... OH Harrison ...... Elk RTionesta Lk ...... L Stillwater Cr ...... Tom Jenkins Dam, Burr Oak, Lk FCAR PA Forest ...... F OH Athens Tionesta Cr ...... Tygart Lake ...... E Br Sandy Cr F ...... WV Taylor ...... Union City Res F ...... Tygart R 60.0 ...... Uniontown L&D PA Erie ...... F KY Union French Cr ...... W FK of Mill Cr Winton Woods Lk ...... 26.5 ..... Ohio R F Willow Island L&D ...... OH Hamilton ...... 909.0 125.6 N WV Pleasants ...... W Fk Mill Cr 1,17 Wills Cr Lk ...... Ohio R 17.6 8 F ...... OH Coshockton Wills Cr, 178.1 N 740.0 1,1 Winfield L&D ...... 721.0 Wolf Cr Dam, Lk Cumberland WV Putnam ...... 47.6 ...... 1,192 1,278 KY Russell Kanawha R ...... Woodcock Cr Lk 0.0 ...... Cumberland R N ...... PA Crawford 664 342.0 ...... Youghiogheny R Lk 9.8 P FCA ...... Woodcock Cr 0.0 ...... 324 PA Fayette 702.0 ...... F 602.0 Youghiogheny R ...... 675.0 F 582.0 Aberdeen L&D and Res ...... 2,142.0 557 0.0 Aliceville Lock Dam & Res MS Monroe ...... 723.0 Allatoona Dam & Res AL Pickens ...... Tombigbee R 566.0 183 ...... PL 79 GA Bartow 673.0 15.0 Tombigbee R ...... N B Everett Jordan Dam & Lk ...... 538.0 ...... 1,209.0 50,250 Etowah R N ...... NC Chatham 1,181.0 99.5 ...... 35 Bay Springs Lock Dam & Res F 1,470.0 ...... Haw R ...... Buford Dam Lk, Sidney Lanier 1,439.0 MS Tishomingo 0 ...... F GA Forsyth, Gwinnett Tombigbee R 3, ...... Carters Dam & Res ...... Chattahoochee R N ...... GA Murray 3.9 ...... F Claiborne Lock Dam & Res ...... Coosawattee R 7.6 Clarks Hill Dam & Lk 302.6 ...... AL Monroe 190.5 ...... F GA Columbia 136.5 Alabama R 860.0 ...... 538.4 Coffeeville Lock Dam & Res ...... 189.5 ...... Savannah R N Columbus Lock Dam & Res 135.5 ...... AL Clark, Choctaw 840.0 ...... 240.0 ...... 4,359 F 37.0 MS Lowndes Tombigbee R 19 8,655 ...... 216.0 3,88 Tombigbee R N 414.0 ...... 31,81 7, N 408.0 89.2 1,099.0 6,700 16.6 1,074.0 390.0 5,740 3, PL 35.0 335.0 19.9 330.0 32.0 8.5 32.5 78,5 5,930 163.5 30.0 5,21 162.5 8,500 9,400 7,500 PL 8,500 PL

250

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00260 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 222.5 . . 7. 14. –168. –858. 9–14. 79–525. 80–858. PL 79–14, 80–858, PL 83–780, 90. PL 60–317. 21 PL 79–525. 21 PL 00 PL 87–874. 00 PL 00 PL 79–14. 00 PL 252 PL 60–317. 252 PL 48,900 PL 78–534. 48,900 PL ...... 40 26,653 PL 89–789. PL 40 26,653 81–516. PL 81 36,375 864 15,512 PL 87–874. PL 864 15,512 4,000 1,475 PL 79–526. PL 4,000 1,475 13,307 7,045 PL 78–534. PL 13,307 7,045 5 1,699 1,586 PL 79–525. 79–525. PL PL 5 1,699 1,586 5 2,021 1,959 0 17,201 16,160 PL 79–14. PL 0 17,201 16,160 0 61,400 55,950 PL 81–516. PL 55,950 0 61,400 .5 980 850 PL 79–525. PL 79–525. PL .5 980 850 .5 2,841 2,615 4.0 3,370 2,880 PL 78–534. PL 4.0 3,370 2,880 0.1 20,810 11,310 PL 89–298. PL 11,310 0.1 20,810 44.0 265 0 PL 78–534. PL 44.0 265 0 414.6 4,453 577 PL 78–534. PL 414.6 4,453 577 FMCAR 89.7 250.1 236.5 11,310 2,600 11,310 236.5 19,700 250.1 48,900 FMCAR 89.7 268.0 300.0 FP 1,027.0 83–780. 83–780. PL PL 26,00 675 107,500 141,250 316,000 1,475 110,500 FP 14.0 385,000 1,000.0 13.0 17.0 1,350 920.0 2,880 111.2 974.0 9.5 14.5 FIMC 273.2 10.5 1,030.0 FIMC 165.0 FIMC 465.0 FM 33.0 South Pacific Division Chickasawbay R ...... RMA 34.3 343.0 328.0 3,800 1,275 Central and Southern FL FNIMC 2,859.0 17.5 10.5 454,900 326,000 PL 71–520, 75–392, Hendry, Palm Beach, Martin. GA Early ...... SC Anderson ...... FP ...... 1,416.0 660.0 625.0 55,950 27,650 SC Abbeville ...... FP 126.8 475.0 470.0 26,653 AL Henry ...... 24,117 ...... Demopolis Lock Dam & Res ...... Falls Dam & Lk AL Sumter, Marengo ...... NC Wake Tombigbee R ...... G W Andrews L&D and Res ...... Neuse R ...... N AL Houston ...... Gainesville L&D and Res F ...... Chattahoochee R ...... Hartwell Dam & Lk AL Sumter, Greene ...... N GA Hart ...... Tombigbee RHolt Lock Dam & Res ...... Savannah R ...... Inglis Dam Lk Rousseau N ...... AL Tuscaloosa ...... F Jim Woodruf L&D FL Levy, Marion, Citrus ...... Black-Warrior RJohn H Kerr Dam & Res ...... FL Gadsden, Jackson 220.9 0.0 ...... Cross FL Barge Canal NP ... VA Mecklenburg Apalachicola R ...... 264.0 John Hollis Bankhead L&D and Res ...... N 73.0 .. Roanoke R 8.2 NP ...... Lk Okeechobee AL Tuscaloosa ...... 25 ...... F FL Okeechobee, Glades, 73.0 102.0 Black-Warrior R 293.0 ...... 5.8 10,000 Lock A NP ...... 96.0 665.0 10,000 109.5 Lock B PL 60–31 MS Monroe ...... 3.3 ...... Lock C 1,540 660. 108.5 MS Monroe ...... 13.0 Tombigbee R ...... 20.0 Lock D ...... 187.0 MS Itawamba 1,281.4 ...... Tombigbee R 1,190 6,920 Lock E N ...... PL 7 MS Itawamba ...... Tombigbee R ...... 186.0 27.5 320.0 ...... Millers Ferry L&D N 77.5 MS Itawamba, Prentiss ...... Tombigbee R 5,900 N ...... Okatibbee Dam & Res PL 27.1 AL Wilcox 3,296 ...... 300.0 ...... 24.0 N Tombigbee R 76.5 MS Lauderdale ...... Alabama R 255.0 83,200 ...... 3, ...... Philpott Dam & Lk 38,850 N ...... 4,030 Okatibbee Cr NP ...... 252.0 VA Henry 36,0 ...... R B Russell Dam and Lk 2,040 F ...... PL 77–675 Smith R 9,245 ...... 0.9 GA Elbert ...... F Robert F Henry Lock Dam & Res 2.7 8,730 ...... Savannah R 220.5 PL 60 1.6 Rodman Dam & Lk Ocklawaha ...... AL Autauga, Lowndes ...... 245.5 ... F 2.0 S–10 & Water Cons Area 1 219 ...... FL Putman & Marion 270.5 Alabama R ..... 16.7 ...... FL Palm Beach 244 0.9 300.5 ...... Cross FL Barge CanalS–11 & Water Cons Area 2A ... NP 269...... Central and Southern FL 46.5 80.0 N 330.5 299. F FL Palm Beach Broward S–12 & Water Cons Area 3A Central and Southern FL 352.0 ...... 34.2 329.5 F 79. FL Broward & Dade ...... Selden Lock and Res 343.0 140.0 985.0 ...... Central and Southern FL W Kerr Scott Dam & Res 889 AL Hale, Greene F ...... 6,580 ...... 480.0 97 44.6 NC Wilkes Black-Warrior R ...... Walter F George L&D ...... 3,8 8 475.0 ...... 181.9 48.0 Yadkin R 125.0 N ...... GA Clay 29,3 ...... West Point Dam & Res F 236.3 ...... 124.0 18.3 Chattahoochee R 23.2 William Bacon Oliver L&D and Res ...... GA Troup .... 13,300 ...... 1,661.0 NP AL Tuscaloosa 16.6 Chattahoochee R ...... 10,470 17.0 20.0 ...... PL 79– 141,250 Black Warrior R NPMAR 17,350 ...... 14.5 141,250 14.5 PL N 12,950 110,500 Alamo Dam & Lk PL 77–675. 110,500 ...... 10.5 9.1 PL 80–858 112.0 Bear Dam AZ Mohave, Yuma 487,200 ...... 1,075.0 385,000 306.1 Black Butte Lk 244.0 CA Mariposa ...... PL 80 Bill Williams R 1,030.0 ...... 95.5 ...... CA Tehama 635.0 Bear Cr 190.0 F ...... Stony Cr 94.0 F ...... 620.0 184.0 FI 25, 45,1 8,200 0 6,900 122.9 1,046.2 1,235.0 122.9 1,174.0 137.1 7.7 790 473.5 413.5 790 3 PL 60–317.

251

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00261 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR § 222.5 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–10 Edition)

16. Auth legis 4–738. 1936. 1936. 78–874. CA 1936. CA 1936, 1941. FCA 1936. PL 86–645. PL 81–516. PL 0 PL 87–874. 0 PL 276 PL 78–534. 276 PL 811 PL 87–874. PL 811 0 FCA 1936. FCA 0 28 0 PL 79–526. PL 28 0 174 0 PL 78–534. PL 174 0 630 0 FCA 1936. FCA 630 0 512 0 PL 78–534. PL 512 0 ,333 2,818 PL 78–534. PL ,333 2,818 Area in acres 53,200 0 PL 81–516. PL 53,200 0 Upper Lower 163 0 FCA 1936. FCA 163 0 1.1 16,423 HD250–83–2. 0 6.0 662 0 PL 78–534. PL 6.0 662 0 65.5 5,956 0 PL 78–534. 65.5 5,956 PL 0 220.0 7,469 4,120 PL 80–858. PL 220.0 7,469 4,120 0 5,780.0 762 87–874. PL 61 M.S.L. 2.5 588.9 2,477 409 PL 78–534. PL 2.5 588.9 2,477 409 Elev limits feet Upper Lower 2,605.5 2,470.0 11,454 785–34. PL 26 .4 564.5 537.5 8,980 3,280 PL 90–483. PL .4 564.5 537.5 8,980 3,280 AF —Continued 1,000 Storage

2 ROJECTS P pose Project pur- FI 140.0 587.0 466.0 1,785 484 20 1,785 1,740 466.0 280 637.0 587.0 1,567 737.5 FI 140.0 1936. 448.0 702 IM 72.3 MR 4,333 FCA 540.0 291.0 2,600 225.0 451.1 500 586.0 FI 85.0 0 713.0 2,411 FI 302.2 184.0 0 4,120 26 228.5 3,280 6,060.0 F 34.9 478.6 6,220.0 537.5 FM 191.3 MR 93.6 IST OF

1 Southwestern Division § 222.5—L TO E R. Littlejohn Cr ...... F 52.0 156.5 120.0 4,107 0 PL 78–534. PPENDIX A Stanislaus. State/county Stream State/county 1 Project name Brea Dam & Res ...... Buchanan Dam H.V. Eastman Lk CA Orange ...... CA Madera Brea Cr ...... Burns Dam ...... Chowchilla R F Carbon Canyon Dam & Res ...... CA Merced ...... Coyote Valley Dam Lk Mendocino F CA Orange ..... Burns Cr ...... CA Mendocino Carbon Cr ...... Dry Cr (Warm Springs) Lk & Channel ...... F East Fork, Russian R F CA Sonoma ...... Farmington Dam F Dry Cr ...... CA San Joaquin, F Fullerton Dam & Res 4.0 ...... 45.0 Hansen Dam Res CA Orange ...... 279.0 Hidden Dam Hensley Lk ...... 587.0 CA Los Angeles Fullerton Cr ...... CA Madera 6.8 208.0 Tujunga Wash ...... F Isabella Lk 559.0 6.6 ...... Fresno R 50.1 300.0 Lopez Dam Res ...... F CA Kern ...... 1,785 ...... 475.0 Mariposa Dam F 136.0 ...... CA Los Angeles 764.8 26 Kern R ...... Martis Cr Lk ...... 1,482 CA Mariposa 403.0 ...... Pocoima Wash ...... 495.0 PL Mathews Canyon Dam & Res FI ...... 737.5 CA Nevada ...... Mariposa Cr ...... Mojave River Dam & Res F 451.1 NV Lincoln ...... 225 1,922 Martis Cr ...... F New Hogan Lk ...... CA San Bernardino ...... Mathews Canyon ...... 3,600 0.8 ...... F 1,740 CA Calaveras Mojave R PL 75–761. 25.4 ...... Owens Dam F ...... 2,60 1,060.0 65.0 290.0 Calaveras RPainted Roc Dam & Res 0 ...... F CA Mariposa PL 7 ...... Pine Canyon Dam & Res 568.1 F 990.0 540.0 261.0 AZ Maricopa ...... Owens Cr ...... Pine Flat Lk Kings R ...... NV Lincoln Gila R ...... F 485.8 Prado Dam & Res ...... 0.4 CA Fresno ...... 15.0 781 ...... Pine CanyonSan Antonio Dam & Res F 1,272.9 62 CA Riverside ...... 1,567 ...... Kings R 19.6 Santa Fe Dam & Res 1,253.7 ...... F 439.5 CA Los Angeles Santa Ana R ...... 5,838...... Sepolveda Dam & Res F 6.3 CA Los Angeles ...... San Antonio Cr ...... 370.0 F 89.7 0 Success Lk ...... 5,461.0 ...... 165.0 CA Los Angeles F San Gabriel R ...... 40 3,134.0 Terminus Dam Lk Kaweah F 5,420.0 ...... CA Tulare ...... Los Angeles R 2,988.0 ...... 713.0 F Whitlow Ranch Dam & Res ...... CA Tulare ...... 2,491.5 Tule R ...... F Whittler Marrows Dam & Res ...... 3.6 1,978 AZ Pinal 300 ...... 666.2 ...... Kaweah R FI 0 661.0 ...... CA Los Angeles 1,000.0 ...... Queen Cr 407.5 ...... FI 4 7.8 San Gabriel Rio Hondo 524.0 F 196.2 951.5 5,675.0 347.0 0 0 5,604.0 PL 81–5 543.0 5 Abiquiu Dam 7.7 ...... 32.1 2,238.0 460.0 NM Rio Arriba 254 17.4 ...... Addicks Res 2,125.0 496.0 ...... 75.0 Rio ChamaAquilla Lk 6, ...... 136.1 TX Harris 710.0 ...... F 421.0 65 145 TX Hill Buffalo Bayou 35.6 ...... 694.0 0 668.0 ...... 1,084 2,166.0 Aquilla Cr F ...... 570.0 2,056.0 1,335 F 0 1,913 FCA 0 8 F 0 572.2 FCA 6,283.5 6, 200.8 161 112.0 7

252

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00262 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 222.5 0 10,950 SD98–76–1. 0 10,950 ,400 1,630 PL 75–761. PL ,400 1,630 ,630 3,770 HD103–771. ,630 3,770 ,000 14,200 PL 85–500. PL ,000 14,200 6,734 0 HD250–83–2, RHA 1938. 11,000 2,910 PA 75–761. PA 11,000 2,910 0 13,380 4,850 PL 87–874. PL 0 13,380 4,850 7.0 4,050 1,680 PL 85–500. PL 85–500. 7.0 4,050 1,680 PL 6.0 2,970 1,360 9.0 12,890 8,240 PL 79–14. PL 9.0 12,890 8,240 21.0 6,040 3,570 PL 86–399. PL 21.0 6,040 3,570 06.0 3,820 1,820 PL 91–611. PL 1,820 06.0 3,820 201.0 13,664 9,692 HD 308–74. HD 201.0 13,664 9,692 ,274.0 5,400 3,230 PL 81–516. PL ,274.0 5,400 3,230 948.5 10,400 2,350 HD440–76–1. 10,400 2,350 948.5 0 1,615.4 15,710 7,910 PL 75–761. 0 1,615.4 15,710 PL 7,910 0 796.0 13,150 4,450 HD440–76–1. 13,150 4,450 0 796.0 7.5 1,339.0 10,740 8,000 PL 89–298. 7.5 1,339.0 10,740 PL 8,000 7.5 858.0 1,520 1,240 PL 87–874. PL 1,520 1,240 7.5 858.0 74.0 750.5 2,340 1,140 PL 87–874. PL 2,340 1,140 74.0 750.5 0 631.0 594.0 23,600 12,400 PL 79–526. PL 12,400 23,600 0 631.0 594.0 FPM 925.1 1,120.0 1,077.0 28,220 15,540 PL 85–500. 0 PL HD88–81–1. 20 3,570 1,820 15,540 42 970.0 372.6 HD572–87–2. 730 28,220 12,400 1,006.0 421.0 3,770 1,077.0 70 HD56–/75–3. FMCR 27.4 470.0 1,240 HD563–87–2. 656.0 1,120.0 M 42.8 594.0 2,710 814.0 384 694.0 FPM 925.1 1,140 MI 372.7 858.0 7,910 0 730.0 NM 72.5 9,200 3,000 8,240 750.5 FMR 27.2 14,200 1,596.5 0 FMCAR 15.8 559.5 1,200 599.5 9,692 75.0 FRPMAC 469.8 1,615.4 5,330.0 909.0 4,155.0 42 FMI 97.2 3,230 5,356.6 M 366.4 HD232–89–1. 4,201.0 1,240.0 810 710 FRC 43.0 64 420 1,360 1,680 1,170 FI 259.6 1,274.0 8,000 4,450 415.0 512.0 1,296.0 437.0 2,350 FMAR 48.5 764.0 526.0 46,120 FMCRQ 25.5 1,339.0 FMCR 15.1 940.0 105,480 796.0 FMAR 154.0 565.0 FMA 44.8 948.5 585.0 FNPM 1,463.0 FA 15.0 White R ...... F 299.6 1,130.0 1,120.0 31,700 28,220 PL 83–780. White R ...... F 2,360.0 Rio Grande 695.0 ...... F 654.0 71,240 45,440 PL 77–228. 545.0 5,460.5 5,356.6 9,361 1,200 PL 86–645. Candian R ...... F 1,510.9 597.0 585.0 147,960 105,480 PL 79–525. Washington. Boone. Los Alamos. Haskell. MO Ozark, Taney ...... PF KS Chautauqua ...... FMCA 1,003.0 654.0 42.8 628.5 710.0 45,440 33,800 687.5 4,850 110 HD563–87–2. Arcadia Lk ...... OK Oklahoma ...... B A Steinhagen Lk ...... Deep Fork RBardwell Lk ...... TX Taylor, Jasper ...... F TX Ellis Neches R ...... Barker Res ...... Waxahachie Cr F Beaver Lk ...... TX Harris Ft Bend ...... F AR Carrol, Benton, Buffalo Bayou ...... Belton Lk F ...... TX Bell 64.4 ...... Benbrook Lk ...... 1,029.5 Leon R ...... TX Tarrant, Parker 1,0 24.5 ...... Big Hill LK F ...... Clear Fk Trinity R 79.6 ...... KN Labette 83.0 ...... F Birch Lk 209.0 ...... 439.0 Big HIll Cr ...... OK Osage ...... 81.0 106.0 F Blue Mountain Lk 4 ...... Birch Cr 13,70 ...... Broken Bow Lk AR Yell, Logan ...... F ...... 73.2 640. OK McCurtain ...... Petit Jean RBull Shoals Lk 1 ...... Mountain Fk R ...... 170.4 F AR Baxter, Marion, F 724.0 Canton Lk ...... 13.1 694.0 OK Blain ...... Canyon Lk 86 ...... 39.0 N Canadian R 7 ...... TX Comal ...... F Clearwater Lk 7 233.3 ...... Guadalupe RCochiti Lk 450.2 ...... MO Reynolds, Wayne ...... 419.0 ... F NM Sandoval, Sante Fe, 627.5 Black R ...... 384.0 Conchas Lk F 599.5 ...... 18 NM San Miguel ...... Copan Lk 265.8 ...... Candian R ...... 1,638. OK Washington ...... F Council Grove Lk 346.4 ...... L Caney R ...... KS Morris 934.0 ...... DeQueen Lk F 391.8 ...... Neosho R ...... 90 AR Sevier ...... 567.0 F Dierks Lk ...... Rolling Fork R ...... AR Sevier, Howard 494.0 ...... F 198.8 Eldorado Lk ...... 10 Saline R 4,218.0 ...... KS Butler 4, ...... F Elk City Lk 184.3 ...... Walnut R ...... KS Montgomery ...... 732.0 F Eufaula Lk ...... 63.8 Elk R ...... OK McIntosh, Pittsburg, 1,289.0 710. F 101.3 1 Fall River Lk ...... 473.5 KS Greenwood 67.1 ...... 43 Fall R ...... 557.5 79.2 F 1,34 52 239.5 825. 234.5 987.5

253

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00263 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR § 222.5 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–10 Edition)

3 Auth legis D 758–79, RHA 1946. PL 81–516. 0 HD 758–79, RHA 1946. 0 4,130 HD 758–79. HD 0 4,130 0 1,310 PL 87–874. PL 0 1,310 00 19,900 FEC 1941. FEC 00 19,900 877 1,370 PL 80–858 PL 877 1,370 700 9,300 PL 81–516. PL 700 9,300 ,480 31,460 PL 75–761. PL ,480 31,460 3,750 3,180 HD 758–79, RHA 1946. Area in acres Upper Lower 12,710 7,280 HD103–77–1. 12,710 7,280 0 10,350 8,100 RHA 1946. RHA 0 10,350 8,100 .0 4,680 1,370 PL 85–500. PL .0 4,680 1,370 .0 11,040 4,400 PL 87–874. PL .0 11,040 4,400 89–298. PL .0 10,940 7,470 404.5 34,490 13,250 PL 79–526. PL 404.5 34,490 13,250 496.0 2,060 0 PL 86–645. 496.0 2,060 PL 0 194.0 211.0 5,820 6,900 5,200 HD 758–79, RHA 1946. 5,550 HD 758–79, RHA 1946. ,004.0 5,690 1,820 PL 74–738. PL 1,820 ,004.0 5,690 87–874. PL ,010.0 38,020 17,040 3,851.0 17,630 11,655 PL 74–738. PL 11,655 3,851.0 17,630 1,900.0 1,260 77–228. PL 510 761.5 3,700 917 PL 79–526. PL 3,700 761.5 917 0 723.0 54,300 23,600 PL 81–516. PL 23,600 54,300 0 723.0 .5 1,125.0 27,730 8,693 PL 74–738. .5 1,125.0 27,730 PL 8,693 .0 733.0 13,000 3,570 PL 74–738. PL 13,000 3,570 .0 733.0 M.S.L. Elev limits feet Upper Lower AF —Continued 1,000 Storage

2 ROJECTS P pose Project pur- FP 53.9 554.0 551.0 19,100 16,950 RHA 1946. RHA 591–82–2. 16,950 HD 0 19,100 83–780. 1,820 0 0 551.0 1,988.0 1,310 PL 4,400 41 310 554.0 699.0 2,004.0 7,380 23,740 1,370 0 440.0 394 FP 53.9 791.0 464.5 510 FM 13.9 451.0 31,460 917 502.0 504.0 MC 29.2 535.0 1,848.0 435.0 FMCQ 29.3 55.5 M 37.9 10 461.0 M 154.3 761.5 4,500 1,900.0 7,470 13,250 FP 716.5 390.0 FM 3.8 0 108 456.0 11,655 404.5 M 5.8 9,300 FMCAR 127.2 0.0 522.0 1,020.0 3,851.0 13,300 M 176.9 1,039.0 23,600 FRC 350.9 706.0 FMAR 70.8 723.0 FNPMC 296.7 IST OF

1 § 222.5—L TO E Arkansas R ...... FC 31.4 1,125.0 1,115.0 8,690 0 PPENDIX A KS Chautaugua ...... FMA 31.1 733.0 KS Cowley ...... 710.0 ...... FMARC 3,570 0 343.5 PL 84–843. 1,010.0 978.0 17,040 5,590 State/county Stream State/county 1 Project name Fort Gibson Lk ...... OK Wagoner ...... Fort Supply Lk ...... Neosho (Grand) R ...... OK Woodward ...... Galisteo Dam F ...... Wolf CrGeorgetown Lk ...... NM Santa Fe ...... F TX Williamson ...... Galisteo CrGillham Lk ...... N.F. San Gabriel R ...... F AR Howard, Polk ...... F Granger Lk ...... Cossatot R ...... TX Williamson 919.2 ...... Grapevine Lk F ...... San Gabriel R ...... 582.0 TX Denton, Tarrant ...... 86.8 F Great Salt Plains Lk ...... Denton Cr 2,028.0 554.0 ...... OK Alfalfa 2 51,0 ...... 79.4 F Greers Ferry Lk ...... 87.6 Salt Fk 5,608.0 AR Cleburne, Van Buren ...... 5, Little Red RHeyburn Lk F 834.0 ...... 188.7 F OK Creek ...... 791.0 569.0 Hords Cr Lk 162.2 ...... Polecat Cr ...... TX Coleman 3,22 502 ...... 528.0 F Hugo Lk 243.1 ...... Hords Cr ...... OK Choctaw 504 ...... 560.0 F Hulah Lk ...... 240.0 Kiamichi R ...... OK Osage 1,138 535.0 934.0 ...... Jemez Canyon Dam F ...... Caney R ...... 487.0 NM Sandoval ...... F Joe Pool Lk ...... 48.4 461.0 Jemez R ...... TX Dalla, Ellis, Tarrant 40 ..John Martin Res 784.0 F ...... 16.7 Mountain Cr ...... CO Bent 1,920.0 ...... John Redmond Dam & Res F ...... 809.1 Arkansas R ...... KS Coffee ...... F 437.5 Kaw Lk 257.9 ...... Neosho R ...... OK Kay, Osage 765 F ...... Keystone Lk ...... Arkansas R 73.0 ...... OK Tulsa 1,238.0 ...... 5,232.0 L&D 01, Norrell F ...... Arkansas R 5,196.1 L&D 02, Wilbur D. Mills Dam ...... 536.0 ...... AR Arkansas ...... F L&D 03 270.3 AR Desha, Arkansas 2, ...... Arkansas Post Canal ..... 522 L&D 04 3,870.0 ..... AR Jefferson, Lincoln ...... Arkansas R .... N L&D 05 ...... 559.0 AR Jefferson ...... Arkansas R N L&D 06, David D. Terry 1,068.0 ...... AR Jefferson ...... Arkansas R ...... 1,039.0 L&D 07, Murray ...... N ...... AR Pulaski 919.4 Arkansas R ...... N 31, ...... AR Pulaski 1,044.5 1,180.0 ...... Arkansas R N ...... 1 Arkansas R ...... N 754. N 0.0 18.7 142.0 162.3 8.3 12.9 142.0 14.4 160.5 182.3 196.3 10,700 9.6 213.3 180.0 24.7 140 9,400 231.3 H 249.7 14 229.0 247. 4,83

254

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00264 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 222.5 –525. 1946. 2. 2. HD 533–78–2. RHA 1946. RHA PL 79–525. PL 0 HD 403–77–1. 0 HD 00 PL 79–525. 00 PL 2,87 ,490 PL 97–525. ,490 PL 21,400 00 31,140 HD 758–79, RHA 1946. 70 2,270 PL 79–525, HD 758–79– 220 1,310 PL 87–874. PL 220 1,310 1,100 8,800 RHA 1946, HD 758–79. 29,450 21,400 18,300 3,550 FCA 1938. FCA 18,300 3,550 5 38,200 18,700 PL 79–526. PL 18,700 5 38,200 .0 12,700 5,440 PL 77–228. PL .0 12,700 5,440 .0 7,680 5,993 PL 87–874. PL .0 7,680 5,993 .5 11,700 5,070 HD 498–83–2. HD .5 11,700 5,070 75–761. PL 21,990 .0 30,700 59.2 95,200 29,200 PL 79–526. PL 59.2 95,200 29,200 776.5 10,740 3,823 PL 83–780. PL 776.5 10,740 3,823 492.0 433.0 602–79–2. HD 13,610 599.0 16,960 1,350.5 9,050 6,200 PL 81–516. PL 1,350.5 9,050 6,200 638.0 56,800 29,460 PL 75–761. PL 29,460 56,800 638.0 0 2,763.5 74–738. 7,640 PL 5,340 .0 1,162.0 14,010 4,610 PL 83–780, HD 535–81– 80.0 443.5 17,230 4,980 PL 85–500. PL 17,230 4,980 80.0 443.5 492.0 503.5 380.0 275.6 M M 250.0 228.5 201.0 18,700 1,100 785–79. 18,700 12 591–82–2. HD 23,280 201.0 0 170 13,100 HD 6,200 433.0 5,070 228.5 29,200 3 1,320.0 515.0 0 M 250.0 375.3 5,440 252.0 1,350.5 1,310 M 436.0 170–85–1. 259.2 424.5 1,120 1,836.0 FMAR 83.3 699.0 FMC 153.3 29,460 HD 1,335 M 53.2 791.0 1,908.0 5,340 592.0 700 3,823 2,726.0 MC 29.2 4,980 638.0 M 80.4 7,115 2,763.5 74,040 414.0 FMN 544.1 FMRC 117.7 114,500 40 443.5 4,746.2 FMCR 88–71. 13,610 FMAC 77.6 149.0 HD 415.0 5,993 119.9 451.0 996 4,776.5 164.4 542.0 PMC 1,446.2 599.0 FI 160.0 FMR 274.2 Angelina R ...... F 1,099.4 Yegua Cr ...... 173.0 F 164.4 142,700 114,500 HD 981–76–1. 337.7 258.0 238.0 24,400 11,460 PL 83–780. tine, Angelina. Burleson. MO Ozark ...... FP 707.0 552.0 510.0 21.990 12,320 FCA 1941 AR Conway ...... Arkansas R ...... N 15.8 287.0 284.0 5,660 4,910 HD 758–79. Rockefeller Lk. L&D 08, Toad Suck Ferry ...... L&D 09, Arthur V. Ormond L&D, W. AR Faulkner, Perry ...... Arkansas RL&D 10, Lk Dardanelle ...... N L&D 11, Ozark-Jetta Taylor ...... AR Pope Yell ...... L&D 13, James W. Trimble AR Franklin ...... Arkansas RL&D 14, W. D. Mayo ...... AR Sebastian, Crawford ArkansasL&D 15, Robert S. Kerr Res ...... NP OK Sequoyah, Leflore ...... Arkansas R ...... NPR L&D 16, Webbers Falls Res OK Leflore, Sequoyah ...... Arkansas R ... N L&D 17, Chouteau ...... OK Muskogee ...... Arkansas R ...... N ...... OK Wagoner Arkansas R ...... NP L&D 18, Newt Graham 8.7 ...... Verdigris R NP Lake O’ The Pines ...... OK Wagoner 265.3 ...... N 72.3 25.3 TX Marion Verdigris R ...... Lavon Lk ...... 263.0 ...... Cypress Cr 338.2 372.5 ...... N 18.1 TX Collin 4,130 ...... F Lewisville Lk Garza-Little Elm Dam 336.0 .... 370.0 East Fork, Trinity R 84.7 392.0 0.0 ...... TX Denton 3,600 34,7 1 ...... 32.4 Marion Lk F ...... 460.0 389.0 413.0 Elm Fork Trinity R ...... KS Marion 490.0 ...... 0.0 Millwood Lk 458.0 6,820 F ...... Cottonwood R ...... 0.0 487.0 43,800 AR Little R Hempstead 511.0 5,200 .. F 0.0 Navarro Mills Lk 579.5 RHA 10,900 40,760 ...... Little R 1,600 ...... 511.0 TX Navarro Hill 532.0 249.5 ...... 9,3 Nimrod Lk F ...... Richland Cr 2,2 Norfork Lk ...... 532.0 228. AR Perry, Yell ...... 0 F 525.2 PL 79 AR Baxter, Fulton Fourche La Fave R 1,490 ...... North Fork Lk ...... North Fork R 532.0 F ...... TX Williamson 1 60.2 ...... O. C. Fisher Lk F 1,358.5 515.0 1,650.0 ...... N.F. San Gabriel R ...... TX Tom Green 39,080 ...... F Oologah Lk 287.0 ...... N. Concho R 23,28 ...... 143.2 OK Rogers ...... 2 F Optima Lk ...... Verdigris R 443.0 ...... 307.0 OK Texas ...... F Pat Mayse Lk 731.8 424 ...... N. Candian R 373.0 ...... TX Lamar ...... F 580.0 Pine Cr 342.0 ...... 87.6 Sanders Cr ...... OK McCurtain 552 ...... Proctor Lk F 834.0 277.2 ...... Little R 1,938.5 ...... TX Comanche ...... 791.0 1,908 965.6 Sam Rayburn Res F Leon R ...... 3, TX Jasper, San Augus- 661.0 F 100.5 2,779. Santa Rosa ...... NM Guadalupe 64.6 ...... Sardis ...... Pecos R 388.1 ...... 460.5 OK Pushmatah ...... Somerville Lk F ...... Jackfork Cr 4 451 310.1 ...... TX Washington, Lee, 1,197 F 340.0 4,746.2 4, 122.6 607.0

255

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00265 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR § 222.5 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–10 Edition)

3 edesignated Auth legis e; CS—Control Structure: DS—Drain- 4,000 88,000 PL 75–761. PL 4,000 88,000 2,250 43,070 PL 77–228. PL 2,250 43,070 Area in acres ervation; R—Recreation; A—Low Flow Aug- 20,800 12,900 RHA 1946. RHA 20,800 12,900 Upper Lower 119,700 20,300 PL 79–526. 119,700 PL 20,300 0 4,806 0 PL 83–780. 0 4,806 PL 0 .0 19,440 7,270 PL 83–780. PL .0 19,440 7,270 30.0 2,107 1,453 PL 85–500. PL 1,453 30.0 2,107 622.0 11,830 6,430 PL 83–780. PL 622.0 11,830 6,430 440–76–1. HD 901.5 11,740 2,660 88–253. PL 10,100 951.4 15,000 0 533.0 49,820 23,560 PL 77–228. PL 23,560 49,820 0 533.0 .0 714.0 13,690 10,190 HD 563–87. HD 10,190 13,690 .0 714.0 .5 474.6 23,070 5,000 PL 75–761. PL 23,070 5,000 .5 474.6 M.S.L. Elev limits feet Upper Lower AF —Continued 1,000 Storage

2 ROJECTS P pose Project pur- M 143.9 238.0 200.0 11,460 0 11,460 0 535–81–2. 6,430 200.0 7,370 1,430 498.0 10,190 12,900 238.0 HD 390–76–1. 0 657.0 622.0 714.0 M 143.9 594.5 1,453 FMARC 311.6 HD 0 M 204.9 632.0 7,240 0.0 475 FP 371.0 370.0 6,230.0 23,560 0 830 FMA 20,300 10,100 455.0 425.0 FI 20.0 910.0 10.7 901.5 896.7 2,660 1,720 180.0 951.4 M 100.8 533.0 FMCAR 199.7 220.0 PM 381.9 FM 142.7 IST OF

1 § 222.5—L TO E ...... FPM 1,612.0 617.0 590.0 88,000 41,000 88,000 590.0 617.0 ...... FPM 1,612.0 PPENDIX A son. AR Carroll, Boone ...... OK Bryan, Cook, Gray- FP 1,181.50 915.0 881.0 43,070 27,300 FCA 1938. State/county Stream State/county 1 Project name F—Flood Control; N—Navigation; P—Hydropower; I—Irrigation; M—Municipal and/or Industrial Water/Supply; C—Fish and Wildlife Cons PL—Public Law; HD—House Document; RHA—River & Harbor Act; PW—Public Works: FCA—Flood Control WSA—Water Supply Act. Res—Reservoir; Lk—Lake; Div—Diversion: R—River; Cr—Creek; Fk—Fork; L&D—Lock & Dam; GIWW—Gulf Intercoastal Waterway; FG—Floodgat 1 2 3 Stiatook ...... OK Osage ...... Stillhouse H. Lk ...... Hominy Cr ...... TX Bell ...... F Table Rock Lk ...... Lampasas R ...... MO Taney, Stone, Barry Tenkiller Ferry Lk F White R ...... OK Cherokee, Sequoyah F Illinois RTexoma Lk, Denison Dam ...... F TX Marshall ...... 178.0 Red RToronto Lk ...... 729 390.6 F KS Woodson ...... Trinidad Lk ...... Verdigris R 760.0 666.0 ...... CO Las Animas F ...... Two Rivers Dam 931.0 576.7 ...... Purgatorie RWaco Lk ...... NM Chaves ...... 915.0 667.0 F TX Mclennan 2,669.0 Rio Hondo R ...... 5 Waurika Lk ...... 632.0 Bosque R F ...... 640.0 OK Jefferson ...... Whitney Lk F ...... Beaver Cr 617.0 179.8 ...... TX Hill, Bosquel 14 ...... F Wister Lk ...... 931.0 Brazos RWright Patman Lk ...... OK Leflore ...... 58.0 ...... F TX Bowie, Cass 6,260.0 Pouteau R ...... 150.0 ...... 6,2 Sulphur R 4,032.0 F ...... 3,945. F 3.3 140.4 500.0 1,372.0 962.5 455 571. 387.0 2,363.7 502 259.5 220.0 mentation or Pollution Abatement; Q—Quality Silt Control. [47 FR 44544, Oct. 8, 1982, as amended at 52 15804, Apr. 30, 1987; 23816, June 25, 57 35757, Aug. 11, 1992. R at 60 FR 19851, Apr. 21, 1995] age Structure; PS—Pump Station.

256

VerDate Mar<15>2010 08:27 Aug 11, 2010 Jkt 220132 PO 00000 Frm 00266 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8017 Y:\SGML\220132.XXX 220132 erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with CFR