Omaha Districtdistrict Huberthubert J.J

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Omaha Districtdistrict Huberthubert J.J SDVOSB Outreach, Training and IndustryOmahaOmaha Exchange DistrictDistrict Forum FY09 Program Brief OmahaOmaha DistrictDistrict HubertHubert J.J. Carter,Carter, Jr.Jr. OfficeOffice ofof SmallSmall BusinessBusiness ProgramsPrograms BUILDINGBUILDING STRONG!STRONG! 2828 MayMay 20092009 OmahaOmaha DistrictDistrict Omaha District Missions • MILITARY CONSTRUCTION • Design & Construction Management • 10 Active Air Force Installations • 2 Air Force Reserve Installations • 1 Army Installation & 1 Reserve • 3 Army Ammunition Plants • 2 Major Reserve Commands • ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM • Environmental Remediation Work Over 550+ Projects Nationwide • CIVIL WORKS • Flood Protection, Navigation, Hydropower, Water Supply, Water Quality, Recreation, Irrigation, Fish & Wildlife, Regulatory, Ecosystem Restoration, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (FCCE) OmahaOmaha DistrictDistrict • 700,000 square miles • Nearly 60 locations Military boundary • 27 Dams (including 6 Civil Works boundary hydropower main stems) • 247 miles River Navigation • 284 Recreation Areas • 99 miles Missouri National • Protective Design MCX Recreation River • Transportation MCX • 6,627 miles of Shoreline • USACE Rapid Response • 4,910 Regulatory Permit • Interior Design CX Applications • Hydrant Fuels CX • 53 Federally-recognized Tribal • MMRP Design Center Nations • Religious Facilities Centers • Protected Cultural Sites of Standardization (COS) • 9-year Drought • Access Control Points COS • 1,202 projects • Regulatory Program in 6 states • Real Estate Services in 10 states CIVIL WORKS ($290 M) Flood Protection, Navigation, Hydropower, Recreation, Regulatory, Ecosystem Restoration, Flood Control and Coastal MILCON ($675 M) Emergencies (FCCE) 18 Active Installations 3 Readiness Centers ER ($198 M) Over 500 Projects Missouri River Helena MONTANAMusselshell River Yellowstone River OmahaOmaha DistrictDistrict Bismarck Minot AFB NORTH Grand Forks WYOMING DAKOTA AFB Black Hills r ive MINNESOTA e R nne eye Pierre Ellsworth AFB Ch J J a a m m e e s s R SOUTH R i i v v e DAKOTA e r Niobrara River r Twin Cities AAP F.E. Warren AFB Min.-St Paul Cheyenne NEBRASKA IAP WISCONSIN Denver M M i i s Rocky MountainLowry AFB s s USAF Academy s o o u Fitzsimons Medical FacilityKearney Platte River u r r Omaha i i Fort McCoy R Buckley ANG Cornhusker AAP Omaha R Badger i i v NORAD v e e AAP r COLORADO r Peterson AFB Fort Gen. Mitchell Schriever AFB Crook Fort Carson Offutt IOWA Field AFB Pueblo DA Iowa AAP Military Works Boundary US Army Facilities US Air Force Facilities Civil Works Boundary Operations Projects Area Offices Regulatory Offices OmahaOmaha DistrictDistrict Omaha District Workload 800 600 CW 400 MILCON ($M) 200 ER Contract Obligations Obligations 0 6 9 FY0 FY07 FY08 FY0 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 CW 202 244 197 200 200 200 200 MIL 431 640 685 609 665 210 586 ER 193 192.5 181 198 204 249 285 $M 826 1077 1063 1007 1069 659 1071 OmahaOmaha DistrictDistrict Planning Branch Yellowstone River Corridor Project, Montana OmahaOmaha DistrictDistrict Major Customer Area • Missouri River - MO, NE, IA, SD, ND, MT • Rocky Mountain Front Range - Denver, Greeley, Boulder, CO and Cheyenne, WY • Yellowstone River Basin – WY, MT, ND • Platte River Corridor - NE, CO, WY • Eastern Nebraska and Western Iowa • Federally Recognized Tribal Governments – Nebraska, North and South Dakota, Montana • Federal Agencies – National Park Service, Bureau of Reclamation OmahaOmaha DistrictDistrict Planning Branch Major Programs • General Investigations (GI) – Congressionally Authorized studies and design. • Construction General (CG)- Congressionally authorized construction and regional programs (Red River, Section 514, Section 203, etc…). • Continuing Authorities (CAP) – Programmatic authorizations for small projects (Section 205, Section 206, Section 1135, etc…). • Cultural Resources Program management and implementation • Project Management, Environmental, Cultural, Native American consultation support to Missouri River Recovery and Mitigation Program and to Project Delivery Teams (internal and virtual) OmahaOmaha DistrictDistrict CIVIL WORKS BRANCH Perry Creek Boyer Bend Western Sarpy OmahaOmaha DistrictDistrict Civil Works Obligations FY08 – FY10 $7.2 $47.0 $59.1 $7.5 $8.0 $35.5 $31.5 $65.5 $13 $13 $69.0 $14.80 $3.0 $75.9 $3.5 $75.0 $3.5 Regulatory O & M GI CG FCCE Other $75.0 FY08 $197 Million Regulatory O & M GI CG FCCE Other Regulatory O & M GI CG FCCE Other FY10 $200 Million FY09 $200 Million OmahaOmaha DistrictDistrict Civil Works Methods of Execution • Planning, engineering, and design work is primarily performed with in-house staff (67%), supplemented by specialized indefinite-delivery type contracts. • All construction work is performed by contract (most thru the IFB process). • Contract procurement decisions are made on a case-by-case basis considering project scope, schedule, and complexity/PASB. OmahaOmaha DistrictDistrict Civil Works Business Opportunities Proposed Project Location/Type of Project Cost Range Adv Date (Qtr/FY) ¾ Ft Peck Selective Withdrawal $200K - $500K 4/09 ¾Yellowstone Corridor Study • Economic Study $100K - $300K 3/09 ¾Cherry Creek Dam Safety • Inundation Mapping $250 K - $500 K 4/09 ¾Lower Yellowstone Project, Intake, MT • Entrainment Protection (Screens) $3M - $5M 4/11 • Entrainment Protection Headworks $7M - $10M 4/11 OmahaOmaha DistrictDistrict CIVIL WORKS OPPORTUNITIES Proposed Project Location/Type of Project Cost Range Adv Date (Qtr/FY) Acquisition = IFB (Low Bid)/ RFP (Request for Proposal) ¾Ft Randall Dam, South Dakota • Stabilization Project $100K - $300K 4/09 • Replace Generator Exciters $3M - $5M 4/09 ¾Gavins Point Dam, South Dakota • Replace Power Plant Drain Piping $100K-$300K 4/09 • Replace 480 Volt Breakers $100K-$300K 4/09 • Replace Emergency Generator $100K-$300K 4/09 • Re-inventory Cedar & Knox Counties $100K-$200K 4/09 OmahaOmaha DistrictDistrict CIVIL WORKS BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES Proposed Project Location/Type of Project Cost Range Adv Date (Qtr/FY) Acquisition = IFB (Low Bid) / RFP (Request for Proposal) ¾Garrison Dam, North Dakota •Replace Breakers $100K-$500K 4/09 • Reinventory Montrail & Dunn $100K-$200K 4/09 •Station Service Upgrade $4M - $6M 3/10 ¾Oahe Dam, South Dakota • Stabilization Project $100K - $300K 4/09 • Switchyard Breaker Replacement $3M - $5M 4/09 • Generator Breaker Replacement $3M - $5M 1/10 OmahaOmaha DistrictDistrict CIVIL WORKS BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES Proposed Project Location/Type of Project Cost Range Adv Date (Qtr/FY) Sand Creek, Nebraska • Seven Upstream Retention Dams $3M - $5M 2/10 • Recreation Features $3M - $5M 3/10 ¾Big Sioux River, South Dakota • Flood Damage Reduction Ph 2C $4M - $15M 3/09 • Flood Damage Reduction Ph 3 $7M - $10M 4/10 ¾Perry Creek, Iowa • Flood Damage Reduction Ph 1 $1M - $2M 3/09 • Flood Damage Reduction Ph 2 $1M - $2M 2/10 OmahaOmaha DistrictDistrict Civil Works – 14 CG ARRA Funded Projects = $64.8 Primary Planned State Allocation Corps ($000) Project Name District Work Description MISSOURI R FISH AND Missouri River Recovery program contracts IA WILDLIFE RECOVERY, IA, KS, Omaha designed for supporting populations of native 6,900 MO, MT, NE, ND & SD species. Design and construction assistance for water- related environmental infrastructure and resource MT RURAL MONTANA, MT Omaha 5,644 protection and development projects in Montana at high priority sites. GARRISON DAM, LAKE Procurement contract for 15 breakers at Garrison ND Omaha 4,500 SAKAKAWEA, ND hydroelectric power plant GARRISON DAM, LAKE Station service construction contract at Garrison ND Omaha 5,500 SAKAKAWEA, ND hydroelectric power plant Procurement contract for fabrication of three 230 GARRISON DAM, LAKE ND Omaha KV transformers at Garrison hydroelectric power 9,400 SAKAKAWEA, ND plant GARRISON DAM, LAKE Installation contract for 3 transformers and 8 High ND Omaha 10,000 SAKAKAWEA, ND Voltage breakers. Civil Works - OmahaOmaha DistrictDistrictARRA Funded Projects Civil Works -14 CG ARRA = $64.8M cont’d. Primary Planned State Corps Allocation Project Name District Work Description ($000) Design and construction assistance for water- OHIO AND NORTH DAKOTA ENV related environmental infrastructure and resource ND Omaha 5,000 INFRASTRUCTURE (SEC 594) protection and development projects in North Dakota, SAND CREEK WATERSHED, Construct sediment trap & wet lands in the upper NE SAUNDERS COUNTY, Omaha 3,698 reaches of the Sand Creek watershed. NEBRASKA WESTERN SARPY COUNTY AND Award levee construction contract for Sarpy and NE Omaha 3,300 CLEAR CREEK, NE Saunders counties along the Platte River. Award next option of levee construction contract WESTERN SARPY COUNTY AND NE Omaha for Sarpy and Saunders counties along the Platte 6,060 CLEAR CREEK, NE River Civil Works - OmahaOmaha DistrictDistrictARRA Funded Projects 14 ARRA CG PROJECTS = $64.8M cont’d. Primary Planned State Corps Allocation Project Name District Work Description ($000) CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX Complete various aspects of Cheyenne River SD TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX, Omaha 1,000 sediment contamination study contract. SD CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX Complete various aspects of Cheyenne River SD TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX, Omaha 1,700 sediment contamination study contract. SD CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX Complete various aspects of terrestrial wildlife SD TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX, Omaha 2,129 restoration construction activities. SD Implementation of site specific study contracts for MISSOURI RIVER conservation, protection, erosion control, water SD Omaha 1,000 RESTORATION, SD quality, and
Recommended publications
  • Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, Dod § 222.5
    Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 222.5 transmitted through the Division Engi- seismic instrumentation at a Corps neer for review and to HQDA (DAEN- project, the Division will send a report CWE) WASH DC 20314 for review and of all pertinent instrumentation data approval. For structures incurring no to the Waterways Experiment Station, damage a simple statement to this ef- ATTN: WESGH, P.O. Box 631, Vicks- fect will be all that is required in the burg, Mississippi 39180. The report on report, unless seismic instrumentation each project should include a complete at the project is activated. (See para- description of the locations and types graph (h)(4) of this section.) of instruments and a copy of the in- (g) Training. The dam safety training strumental records from each of the program covered by paragraph 6 of ER strong motion machines activated. (Ex- 1130–2–419 should include post-earth- empt from requirements control under quake inspections and the types of paragraph 7–2v, AR 335–15). damage operations personnel should (5) The Engineering Divisions of the look for. Division offices will select structures (h) Responsibilities. (1) The Engineer- for special instrumentation for earth- ing Divisions of the District offices will quake effects, and will review and mon- formulate the inspection program, con- itor the data collection, processing, duct the post-earthquake inspections, evaluating, and inspecting activities. process and analyze the data of instru- They will also be specifically respon- mental and other observations, evalu- sible for promptly informing HQDA ate the resulting condition of the structures, and prepare the inspection (DAEN-CWE) WASH DC 20314, when reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, Dod § 222.5
    Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 222.5 transmitted through the Division Engi- seismic instrumentation at a Corps neer for review and to HQDA (DAEN- project, the Division will send a report CWE) WASH DC 20314 for review and of all pertinent instrumentation data approval. For structures incurring no to the Waterways Experiment Station, damage a simple statement to this ef- ATTN: WESGH, P.O. Box 631, Vicks- fect will be all that is required in the burg, Mississippi 39180. The report on report, unless seismic instrumentation each project should include a complete at the project is activated. (See para- description of the locations and types graph (h)(4) of this section.) of instruments and a copy of the in- (g) Training. The dam safety training strumental records from each of the program covered by paragraph 6 of ER strong motion machines activated. (Ex- 1130–2–419 should include post-earth- empt from requirements control under quake inspections and the types of paragraph 7–2v, AR 335–15). damage operations personnel should (5) The Engineering Divisions of the look for. Division offices will select structures (h) Responsibilities. (1) The Engineer- for special instrumentation for earth- ing Divisions of the District offices will quake effects, and will review and mon- formulate the inspection program, con- itor the data collection, processing, duct the post-earthquake inspections, evaluating, and inspecting activities. process and analyze the data of instru- They will also be specifically respon- mental and other observations, evalu- sible for promptly informing HQDA ate the resulting condition of the structures, and prepare the inspection (DAEN-CWE) WASH DC 20314, when reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Peak-Flow Frequency Estimates Based on Data Through Water Year 2001 for Selected Streamflow-Gaging Stations in South Dakota
    Prepared in cooperation with the South Dakota Department of Transportation Peak-Flow Frequency Estimates Based on Data through Water Year 2001 for Selected Streamflow-Gaging Stations in South Dakota Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5104 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover photographs: Upper left: U.S. Geological Survey hydrologic technician measures the flow of the Cheyenne River near Plainview (station 06438500) during flood conditions in 1997. Photograph by U.S. Geological Survey. Upper right: James River near Redfield (station 06475000) during flood conditions in 1997. Photograph by U.S. Geological Survey. Bottom: Cars were stacked by the force of water as it pushed through Rapid City leaving the banks of Rapid Creek during the 1972 flood. Photograph courtesy of the Rapid City Journal. Peak-Flow Frequency Estimates Based on Data through Water Year 2001 for Selected Streamflow-Gaging Stations in South Dakota By Steven K. Sando, Daniel G. Driscoll, and Charles Parrett Prepared in cooperation with the South Dakota Department of Transportation Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5104 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1–888–ASK–USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1–888–ASK–USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary State Corps District Project Name Work Description
    American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Army Corps of Engineers - Civil Works Investigations Planned Primary Corps District Project Name Work Description - as of 5 January 10 Allocation State ($) Issue contract for State of Alaska Regional Harbor AK Alaska Alaska Regional Ports, AK 240,000 Development Study Award contract for hydraulic analysis and participation AK Alaska Anchorage Harbor Deepening, AK 150,000 in ship simulation modeling. Award contract for design analysis to include wave AK Alaska Kenai River Bluff Erosion, AK 300,000 hindcast and revetment design Award contract for economic analysis, environmental AK Alaska Little Diomede Harbor, AK 250,000 studies and geotechnical investigations Issue contracts for airborne laser mapping surveys in conjunction with US Geologic Survey, wetlands AK Alaska Matanuska River Watershed, AK mapping in conjunction with Fish and Wildlife Service, 372,000 wetlands delineation assessment, and data gap analysis. Fully obligate incrementally funded Architect/Engineer Va Shly-Ay Akimel Salt River contract to complete final Plans and Specifications and AZ Los Angeles 645,000 Restoration, AZ the Detailed Design Report for the first construction contract award on Phase 1 of the project. Fully funded Architect/Engineer contract to complete CA Los Angeles Carpinteria Shoreline Study, CA the draft Environmental Impact Statement associated 130,000 with the Feasibility Report. Complete Independent Technical Review and fund Coast of CA, South Coast Region (Los CA Los Angeles Architect Engineer contract to complete draft Final 162,258 Angeles Co) Report Fully fund Architect/Engineer contract to prepare plans CA Los Angeles Lower Mission Creek, CA and specifications for the construction on the lower half 600,000 of project Award an option for the High Flow Bypass Facility CA Los Angeles Matilija Dam, CA 250,000 Design.
    [Show full text]
  • American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Army Corps of Engineers - Civil Works Expenditure Plan Operations and Maintenance
    American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Army Corps of Engineers - Civil Works Expenditure Plan Operations and Maintenance Planned Primary Project Name Corps District Work Description Allocation State ($000) AK ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK ALASKA Dredging in front of new intermodal dock facilities to -35 ft MLLW. 23,499 Remodel Project office to comply with American w/ Disabilities Act; perform energy upgrades; replace AK CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK ALASKA underground fuel tank and heating system to meet Environmental Compliance requirements. 4,600 AK CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK ALASKA Repair/replace non functioning relief wells and tie in well elevations to dam crest. 900 AK CORDOVA HARBOR, AK ALASKA Award option to existing dredging contract to remove a shoal blocking the entrance to the Cordova harbor. 700 Remove additional sediments from sediment trap to keep entrance channel clear through 90% of the open AK NOME HARBOR, AK ALASKA water season. 200 AK PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AK ALASKA Update vertical datum at approximately 10 Alaska coastal projects to meet CEPD requirements. 1,000 Perform sediment chemical characterization analysis for in-water disposal approval and remove entrance AK SEWARD HARBOR, AK ALASKA channel and inner harbor sediments to provide access to facilities. 900 Replace park attendant sites (12 total) in Six Class A campgrounds. Upgrades campsite infrastructure to AL ALABAMA RIVER LAKES, AL MOBILE current standards and reduces future maintenance costs. 200 Planned Primary Project Name Corps District Work Description Allocation State ($000) Upgrade or replace aging construction equipment utilized throughout large site for facilities maintenance. AL ALABAMA RIVER LAKES, AL MOBILE Reduces future maintenance costs.
    [Show full text]
  • National United States of America
    THE NATIONAL GAZETTEER. OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SOUTH DAKOTA 1989 THE NATIONAL GAZETTEER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SOUTH DAKOTA 1989 "The Pulpit," Badlands National Park, South Dakota. Apparently for farming, that is often spectacularly carved by water and wind into named for its resemblance to a ministerial pulpit, "The Pulpit" is an unusual landforms. On older maps of the area, badlands are indi- example of the complex features characteristic of South Dakota cated by the French name "Mauvaises Terres," which had the Badlands. In South Dakota, the term "badlands" is generally used to implied meaning of "bad-for-traveling lands." (Photograph by H.H. describe rough, broken country, devoid of vegetation and unsuited Darton, 1898, U.S. Geological Survey.) THE NATIONAL GAZETTEER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA- SOUTH DAKOTA 1989 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1200-SD Prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the U.S. Board on Geographic Names UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1989 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director U.S. BOARD ON GEOGRAPHIC NAMES Rupert B. Southard, Chairman Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data The National gazetteer of the United States of America. South Dakota 1989 / prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the U.S. Board on Geographic Names. p. cm. (U.S. Geological Survey professional paper ; 1200-SD) Supt.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Data As a Service for US Army Corps of Engineers Reservoirs
    Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions CreatingCreating a Centralized Data as a Database Service for for U.S. LaurenArmy Patterson Corps of Engineers Reservoir Data Martin W. DoyleU.S. Army Corps of Engineers Reservoirs Lauren Patterson* Martin W. Doyle* Samantha Kuzma** * Report Report NI R 18-01 NI R 17-02 NICHOLAS INSTITUTE NICHOLASFOR ENVIRONMENTAL INSTITUTE POLICY SOLUTIONS January 2018 FOR ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY SOLUTIONS November 2017 CONTENTS SUMMARY In the United States, our water data infrastructure does Introduction 2 not allow us to consistently and quickly answer the The Slow Data Revolution for Water 3 most basic questions about our water system’s quantity, The Open Water Data Initiative 4 quality, and use. The data to answer those questions are The Army Corps’ Federalist Structure for Reservoir often collected but by multiple agencies across different Operations and Data Management 6 scales and for different purposes, making them difficult Open Data Models 8 to access, to integrate with other data, and to put to Building a National Database of Army Corps further use to support decision making. Even within Reservoirs 9 single agencies, data are often not shared among regional Incorporating Federated District Databases 18 offices, and even if they were, they would have to be Discussion 27 standardized to be of use. Data Availability 30 Appendix A: Table Descriptions 31 One huge repository of water data is the U.S. Army Appendix B: Description of District Data 32 Corps of Engineers. Through a federated governance structure—whereby each region has its own political References 61 authority, management, and data—the Army Corps Affiliation manages day-to-day operations.
    [Show full text]
  • G Recreation Costs Incurred by Those Who Use Recreation Amenities Most Heavily
    EExecutive Summary ver the past half century, the nation’s federal manmade lakes have become a powerful recre- O ation attraction. These lakes, a product of dams built primarily for other purposes, have acquired significant added value in water-related recreation. They have become popular destina- tions for vacations and day trips. By the hundreds of thousands, people flock to their waters, their shores, their adjacent parks, and their tailwaters downstream. Federal lakes are a canvas of boat- ing, camping, swimming, fishing, hiking, and other leisure pursuits. Lake recreation is also an economic force, greatly buoying state tourism and local economies. This very success, however, reveals long neglected and growing problems at fed- eral lakes. Despite good intentions, many of the federal agencies in charge of lakes are unable to provide recreation facilities and lake conditions that meet public demand and present-day expectations; and they are failing to recognize and act on recreation opportunities. So say recreation consumers, industry groups, conservation organizations, and state and local governments. All have become increasingly dissatisfied with recreation at federal lakes. The National Recreation Lakes Study Commission was created by Congress and appointed by President Clinton to examine these concerns. After a year of research, nationwide workshops, and deliberations, the Commission finds that recreation at federal lakes is, in fact, beset by a multitude of difficulties and shortcomings. At many sites, facilities ranging from restrooms to boat docks to roads are inad- equate, aging, and falling apart. Pollution and aquatic plant invasions threaten lake health. Fish habitat is compromised, and with it, species survival and sport fishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Cold Brook and Cottonwood Springs Dam and Lake Projects Master Plan Fall River Basin, South Dakota
    Omaha District Draft Cold Brook and Cottonwood Springs Dam and Lake Projects Master Plan Fall River Basin, South Dakota July 2016 Draft Cold Brook and Cottonwood Springs Master Plan Fall River Basin, South Dakota 2016 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS PERTINENT PROJECT INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................ VI LISTING OF PRIOR DESIGN MEMORANDUMS .......................................................................................................... VII CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1-1 PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 1-1 PROJECT PURPOSES ............................................................................................................................................... 1-2 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE MASTER PLAN ........................................................................................................ 1-2 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................................ 1-2 Scope ................................................................................................................................................................ 1-3 WATERSHED AND PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Annual Report Tributary Reservoir Regulation Activities (August 2004 – September 2005) Northwest Division Omaha District
    Tributary Reservoir Regulation Activities 20052005 AnnualAnnual ReportReport (August 2004 – September 2005) Holmes Dam and Lake Lincoln, Nebraska Water Control and Water Quality Section Hydrologic Engineering Branch Engineering Division Omaha District January 2006 2005 ANNUAL REPORT TRIBUTARY RESERVOIR REGULATION ACTIVITIES (AUGUST 2004 – SEPTEMBER 2005) NORTHWEST DIVISION OMAHA DISTRICT CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 1-1 CHAPTER 2 – RESERVOIRS IN THE OMAHA DISTRICT ......................................... 2-1 a. Reservoirs with Flood Control Storage .............................................................. 2-1 b. Reservoirs without Flood Control Storage ......................................................... 2-2 CHAPTER 3 – TRIBUTARY RUNOFF AND FLOODS................................................. 3-1 a. General Hydrologic Conditions.......................................................................... 3-1 i. Long-Term Trends .................................................................................. 3-1 ii. Rocky Mountain Snow Conditions .......................................................... 3-1 b. Significant Weather Events, August 2004 through September 2005................. 3-6 i. Late Summer 2004 ................................................................................. 3-6 ii. Fall 2004................................................................................................. 3-7 iii. Winter of 2004-2005 ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]