Feeding Larval Marine Fishes in the Laboratory: a Review Robert C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Feeding Larval Marine Fishes in the Laboratory: a Review Robert C Calif. Mar. Res. Comm., CalCOFI Rept., 14 :76-83, 1970. FEEDING LARVAL MARINE FISHES IN THE LABORATORY: A REVIEW ROBERT C. MAY ’ Scripps Institution of Oceanography La Jolla, Cailfornia INTRODUCTION of this well-studied family of predominantly marine fishes. Interest in rearing marine fishes under laboratory The present review will summarize previous at- conditions has intensified during the past decade, and tempts to feed the larvae of marine fishes in the there is every reason to believe that this trend will laboratory by presenting 1) a list of all food types continue. The larval stages of marine fishes are being used in the studies reviewed, and 2) a general discus- investigated experimentally because of their inherent sion of the major food types. Only reports describing biological interest, their importance in determining the rearing of larvae hatched from eggs in the labora- recruitment in adult fish populations, and their cen- tory are considered here, and reports of rearing in tral place in problems associated with large-scale fish large, uncontrolled bodies of water such as ponds, culture. The greatest difficulty in attempts to rear are excluded. Also excluded, of course, are studies marine fishes through the larval stage has frequently dealing with the rearing of fishes which have no free- been to provide a suitable food-that is, a food which swimming larval stage. A number of papers have ap- the larvae will consume and grow on and which can peared during the 1960’s concerned with the physi- be supplied in sufficiently large quantities. The litera- ology and behavior of marine fish larvae; although ture on rearing marine fishes is scattered, in several they frequently include mention of feeding in the languages, and in some cases not readily accessible, laboratory, most of them have been omitted here since and a comprehensive review emphasizing feeding has the methods used are usually described in greater not appeared until now. This review summarizes the detail in other papers more specifically concerned attempts to feed larval marine fishes in the laboratory with rearing techniques. which have been described in the literature from 1878 One of the drawbacks of reviews of this kind is that through 1969, in the hope that such a review will aid they necessarily oversimplify the original work and persons who undertake similar work in the future. thus may be misleading if not used properly. When Several previous reviews contain information rele- dealing with reports-many of which are sketchy al- vant to the problem of feeding larval fishea. Hert- most to the point of uselessness-of experiments con- ling’s treatise on rearing marine fishes (Hertling, ducted under vastly different conditions with a 1932) includes a section on feeding, but investigators variety of species, comparisions are difficult and now will find his discussion of little help, partly be- generalizations risky. If a particular food type was cause at the time he was writing, relatively little work used in the past without success, it is still possible had been done on rearing beyond the yolk-sac stage that it will prove useful for another species of fish or under laboratory conditions. Morris (1955) confined for the same species under different conditions. Also, his discussion of nutrition in marine fish larvae to a several different approaches to the problem of feed- consideration of Putter’s theory that dissolved or- ing may prove equally fruitful. A case in point is the ganic matter is an important source of nutrition for rearing of the sole, Solea solea: Fabre-Domergue and fishes, an hypothesis which has so far not been de- Bihtrix (1905) reared sole using a flagellate as first finitively tested in larval fishes. Morris (1956) de- food and, later, wild plankton from which the larvae scribed rearing experiments with 17 species of selectively preyed upon other fish larvae and ignored California fishes and included a lengthy discussion of copepod nauplii ; nevertheless, Fluchter (1965) ob- various food types. Hirano and Oshima (1963) re- tained excellent results by feeding larvae of this viewed methods of feeding the larvae of a variety of species only artemia nauplii. marine animals, including selected examples of at- The emphasis of the present review on feeding is tempts to feed larval fishes, and supplied valuable not meant to imply that other factors are not im- data on the sizes of various potential food organisms. portant for the successful rearing of larval fishes, or Shelbourne (1964) described his extensive work with that larval survival in the studies reviewed was solely the plaice and gave an account of the historical de- dependent upon the choice of food. Providing a suit- velopment of marine fish culture. Blaxter (1965) able food is a sine qua non in any rearing attempt, discussed the feeding ecology of herring larvae, inte- but a host of other significant factors are operating grating data from the laboratory and the field, and in the complex artificial environment of the larvae. Blaxter and Holliday (1963), reviewing the biology The importance of such factors is evident, for ex- of the clupeids, summarized information on the larvae ample, in Blaxter’s (1968a) observation that although 1 National Marine Fisheries Service Fellow. This work was done over 90% of the herring larvae in his experiments at the National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery-Ocean- ography Center, La Jolla, California. were feeding well, only 25-35% survived yolk-ab- REPORTS VOLUME XIV, 1 JULY 196s TO 30 JUNE 1969 77 sorption. Also, it is not uncommon to find dead larvae TABLE 1-Continued with food in their guts. A discussion of factors other Foods Used in Attempts to Rear the larvae of Marine Fishes than food is beyond the scope of the present review, and persons interested in the details of the studies Food References reviewed here must consult the original papers. Bacillariophyceae Coscinodiscus coneinnus- - - - - - - Hertling, 1932 LIST OF FOOD TYPES Coscinodiscus radiatus -... - - - - Gross, 1937 Skeletonema costatum- - - - -.- - - Blaxter, 1962; Forrester, 1964; Gross, Table 1 lists the food types which have been used 1937; Kurata, 1956, 1959 in all papers included in the review. For con- Thalassiosira sp _.__ ___.__ Gross, 1937 Lauderia borealis- - __ -.- __ __.- Blaxter, 1969 venience the living organisms other than wild plank- Rhizosolenia sp - ._._.___David, 1939 ton have been arranged taxonomically under four Chaetoceros sp David, 1939 main headings : Protista: planktonic forms; Protista: Biddulphia mobiliensis--- - - - - - Hertling, 1932 Ditylum briahtwellii- - - - - __ -.. Blaxter, 1969 nonplanktonic forms; Metazoa: planktonic forms; Nitzschia closteium .__._.- ._._ Drcutt, 1950 and Metazoa: nonplanktonic fornas. In a few cases Nitzschia sp Bishai, 1961; Blaxter. 1962: Budd, 1940 “Diatoms”--- - - -.- - __ - - - - - - - David, 1939; Rubinoff, 1958 the designations planktonic and nonplanktonic are somewhat arbitrary. Nonliving foods and “prepared Eumycophyta Ascomycetes aquaria” have been placed under the heading Miscel- “Yeast”. .. ~. ._._ .._ .____ Klirna et al.. 1962; Morris, 1956 laneozts. Taxonomy uncertain “Natural and cultured phyto- plankton” - - -..- - - - - - - - - - - Klima et al., 1962 TABLE 1 “Raw cultures of phytoplankton” Dannevig, 1948 “Cultures of single species of green Foods Used in Attempts to Rear the larvae of Marine Fishes algae and naked flagellates”--- Dannevig. 1948 - “Phytoplankton”_ -... - - -.- - - - Bishai. 1961; Ivanchenko & Ivan- chenko, 1969 Food References “Plankton algae”. - - -.-. _. __ -. - Runnstrom. 1941 --- “Algae”. .. -. .. -. .. - - - - - - - - - - Fabre-Domergue & Bibtrix, 1897 “Monadinen”. .. - -... -. .-. - - -. Kotthaus, 1939 WILD PLANKTON “Vegetarian diet” .___.-.-. -. _. - Soleim, 1942 Antony, 1910; Blaxter, 1968, 1969; Blaxter and Hempel, 1961; Budd, 1940; PROTISTA: Cunningham, 1893-95a & b; A. Dan- NONPLANKTONIC FORMS nevig, 1948; H. Dannevig, 1897; Dan- Cyanophyta nevig & Hansen. 1952; David, 1939; “une nostocacee” - -.- __ ._. .. -. Fabre-Domergue & BiBtrix, 1897 Fabre-Domergue & Bibtrix, 1897,1905; Garstang, 1900; Ivanchenko & Ivan- Chlorophyta chenko, 1969; Kramer & Zweifel, 1970; Enleromorpha sp.. ___ ..__._.. Kotthaus, 1939 Lebour, 1925; Meyer, 1878; Mito et al., 1969; Morris, 1956; Okamoto. 1969; Chrysophyta Orcutt, 1950; Richards & Palko, 1969; “Filamentous brown diatom”- __ Fabre-Domergue & Bidtrix, 1897 Schach, 1939; Schumann, in Bardach, 1968; Yamamoto & Nishioka, 1952 Ciliophora Ciliata PROTISTA: PLANKTONIC Euplotes sp Fabre-Domergue & Bidtrix, 1897 FORMS Philaster digitiformis. - - - - - - - - Fabre-Domergue & Bidtrix, 1897 Chlorophyta Stylonychia sp Kasahara et al.. 1960 Loxophyceae Platymonas subcordiformis-----. Orcutt, 1950 Taxonomy uncertain Halosphaera minor __.________.Blaxter, 1969 “Filamentous algae”- - -..__. _.- Delmonte et al., 1968 Chlorophyceae “Cultured infusorians”- - -.- - - - - Fabre-Domergue & BiBtrix. 1897 Chlamydomonas sp _._... Bishai, 1961; Blaxter, 1962,1969; Gross, 1937: Qasim, 1955, 1959 METAZOA: Dunaliella primoleeta- -.-. -. -. Blaxter, 1969 PLANKTONIC FORMS Dunaliella salina-- __ - __ - - - - - -. Fabre-Domergue & BiBtrix, 1905 Aschelminthes Dunaliella sp Blaxter, 1962; Budd, 1940; Delmonte Rotifera et al., 1968; Morris, 1956 Brachinous plicatilis--- __ _.-.- Hirano, 1969; Mito et al., 1969; Oka- Chlorella stigmata.. - - - - __ __ __ . Qasim, 1955 moto. 1969 Chlorella sp Blaxter, 1962 Mollusca Stichococcus sp Morris, 1956 Gastropoda Crepidula sp. “larvae” ____
Recommended publications
  • Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings for 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California
    UC San Diego Fish Bulletin Title Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93g734v0 Authors Pinkas, Leo Gates, Doyle E Frey, Herbert W Publication Date 1974 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 161 California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California By Leo Pinkas Marine Resources Region and By Doyle E. Gates and Herbert W. Frey > Marine Resources Region 1974 1 Figure 1. Geographical areas used to summarize California Fisheries statistics. 2 3 1. CALIFORNIA MARINE FISH LANDINGS FOR 1972 LEO PINKAS Marine Resources Region 1.1. INTRODUCTION The protection, propagation, and wise utilization of California's living marine resources (established as common property by statute, Section 1600, Fish and Game Code) is dependent upon the welding of biological, environment- al, economic, and sociological factors. Fundamental to each of these factors, as well as the entire management pro- cess, are harvest records. The California Department of Fish and Game began gathering commercial fisheries land- ing data in 1916. Commercial fish catches were first published in 1929 for the years 1926 and 1927. This report, the 32nd in the landing series, is for the calendar year 1972. It summarizes commercial fishing activities in marine as well as fresh waters and includes the catches of the sportfishing partyboat fleet. Preliminary landing data are published annually in the circular series which also enumerates certain fishery products produced from the catch.
    [Show full text]
  • Teleostei, Clupeiformes)
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations Biological Sciences Fall 2019 Global Conservation Status and Threat Patterns of the World’s Most Prominent Forage Fishes (Teleostei, Clupeiformes) Tiffany L. Birge Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Birge, Tiffany L.. "Global Conservation Status and Threat Patterns of the World’s Most Prominent Forage Fishes (Teleostei, Clupeiformes)" (2019). Master of Science (MS), Thesis, Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/8m64-bg07 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds/109 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GLOBAL CONSERVATION STATUS AND THREAT PATTERNS OF THE WORLD’S MOST PROMINENT FORAGE FISHES (TELEOSTEI, CLUPEIFORMES) by Tiffany L. Birge A.S. May 2014, Tidewater Community College B.S. May 2016, Old Dominion University A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE BIOLOGY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY December 2019 Approved by: Kent E. Carpenter (Advisor) Sara Maxwell (Member) Thomas Munroe (Member) ABSTRACT GLOBAL CONSERVATION STATUS AND THREAT PATTERNS OF THE WORLD’S MOST PROMINENT FORAGE FISHES (TELEOSTEI, CLUPEIFORMES) Tiffany L. Birge Old Dominion University, 2019 Advisor: Dr. Kent E.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Biology of Cetengraulis Edentulus (Cuvier, 1829), the Major Fishery Resource in Guanabara Bay, Brazil
    Neotropical Ichthyology, 12(4): 819-826, 2014 Copyright © 2014 Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia DOI: 10.1590/1982-0224-20130205 Reproductive biology of Cetengraulis edentulus (Cuvier, 1829), the major fishery resource in Guanabara Bay, Brazil Ana Clara Sampaio Franco1, Daniel Shimada Brotto2, David Man Wai Zee3 and Luciano Neves dos Santos1 Cetengraulis edentulus is a broadely distributed engraulid in Southwest Atlantic, currently accounting for the main fish species commercially exploited at Guanabara Bay, Brazil. This study aimed to extend the knowledge on reproduction of C. edentulus at Guanabara Bay and to test whether some descriptors of reproductive activity, especially the gonadosomatic index (GSI), and the index of reproductive activity (IRA) changed among seasons. A total of 978 C. edentulus specimens were retrieved from purse seine commercial landings at Conservas Rubi S.A. company, in São Gonçalo city, RJ. Subsamples of 90-120 individuals were collected from bimonthly yields between July 2010 (winter) and June 2011 (autumn). Most fish were adults (120-170 mm TL), in response to the high selectivity of commercial fisheries. All descriptors indicated a broad spawning period (late winter to spring), peaking in November, suggesting this is the critical period to protect C. edentulus stocks from overfishing at Guanabara Bay. Fecundity averaged 12,720 oocytes and was positively related to fish size, GSI and fullness index, indicating that preserving larger individuals (TL > 160 mm) could contribute significantly to the reproductive success of C. edentulus, since they produce more oocytes. Cetengraulis edentulus é um engraulídeo amplamente distribuído no Atlântico Sudoeste, sendo um importante recurso comercialmente explorado na baía de Guanabara, Brasil.
    [Show full text]
  • 61661147.Pdf
    Resource Inventory of Marine and Estuarine Fishes of the West Coast and Alaska: A Checklist of North Pacific and Arctic Ocean Species from Baja California to the Alaska–Yukon Border OCS Study MMS 2005-030 and USGS/NBII 2005-001 Project Cooperation This research addressed an information need identified Milton S. Love by the USGS Western Fisheries Research Center and the Marine Science Institute University of California, Santa Barbara to the Department University of California of the Interior’s Minerals Management Service, Pacific Santa Barbara, CA 93106 OCS Region, Camarillo, California. The resource inventory [email protected] information was further supported by the USGS’s National www.id.ucsb.edu/lovelab Biological Information Infrastructure as part of its ongoing aquatic GAP project in Puget Sound, Washington. Catherine W. Mecklenburg T. Anthony Mecklenburg Report Availability Pt. Stephens Research Available for viewing and in PDF at: P. O. Box 210307 http://wfrc.usgs.gov Auke Bay, AK 99821 http://far.nbii.gov [email protected] http://www.id.ucsb.edu/lovelab Lyman K. Thorsteinson Printed copies available from: Western Fisheries Research Center Milton Love U. S. Geological Survey Marine Science Institute 6505 NE 65th St. University of California, Santa Barbara Seattle, WA 98115 Santa Barbara, CA 93106 [email protected] (805) 893-2935 June 2005 Lyman Thorsteinson Western Fisheries Research Center Much of the research was performed under a coopera- U. S. Geological Survey tive agreement between the USGS’s Western Fisheries
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission Comision Interamericana Del Atun Tropical
    INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION COMISION INTERAMERICANA DEL ATUN TROPICAL Bulletin - Bolet(n Vol. 11, No. 8 THE INTESTINE AS A DIAGNOSTIC CHARACTER IN IDENTIFYING CERTAIN CLUPEOIDS (ENGRAULIDIDAE, CLUPEIDAE, DUSSUMIERIIDAE) AND AS A MORPHOMETRIC CHARACTER FOR COMPARING ANCHOVETA (CETENGRAULIS MYSTICETUSJ POPULATIONS EL INTESTINO COMO CARACTER DIAGNOSTICO PARA LA IDENTIFICA­ CION DE CIERTOS CLUPEOIDES (ENGRAULIDIDAE, CLUPEIDAE, DUSSUMIERIIDAE) y COMO CARACTER MORFOMETRICO PARA LA COMPARACION DE LAS POBLACIONES DE ANCHOVETA lCETENGRAULIS MYSTICETUSJ by - por WILHELM HARDER La Jolla, California 1958 CONTENTS - INDICE ENGLISH VERSION - VERSION EN INGLES Page INTRODUCTION ---.-------------------------------------------- 367 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF CLUPEOID ALIlvIENTARY TRACT ----------- 367 I~NGRAULIDIDAE -------------.-----------.---------------.---- 368 CLUPEIDAE . ---------------------------------------------------------- 370 DUSSUMIERIIDAE ---------- . 371 DIFFERENCES IN SPECIMENS OF CETENGRAULIS MYSTICETUS FROM DIFFERENT LOCALITIES - . -------------------- 371 ACKNO\VLEDGEMENTS ----------------------------------.------------------------------------ 372 FIGURES - ILUSTRACIONES ------------------------ 373 TABLES - TABLAS --- 378 SPANISI-I VERSION - VERSION EN ESPA:ÑOL Página INTRODUCCION ------------ 381 DESCRIPCION DEL TRACTO ALIl\1ENTICIO DE LOS CLUPEOIDES 382 ENGRAULIDIDAE . 382 CLUPEIDAE -----------. 384 DUSSUMIERIID.A.E --------------------- 385 DIFERENCIAS EN LOS EJEMPLARES DE CETENGRAULIS MYSTICETUS DE DISTINTAS LOCALIDADES
    [Show full text]
  • IN PREHISTORY the Lvolution of Archaic and Formative Cultures
    I PACIFIC LATIN AMERICA IN PREHISTORY The Lvolution of Archaic and Formative Cultures Edited by Michael Blake WSU PRESS Washington State University Press Pullman, Washington Washington State University Press PO Box 645910 Pullman, WA 99164-5910 Phone 800-354-7360; FAX 509-335-8568 ©1999 by the Board of Regents of Washington State University All rights reserved First printing 1999 Printed and bound in the United States of America on pH neutral, acid-free paper. Reproduction or transmission of material contained in this publication in excess of that permitted by copyright law is prohibited without permission in writing from the publisher. Libraly ofCongress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Pacific Latin America in prehistory: the evolution of archaic and formative cultures / edited by Michael Blake. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-87422-166-8 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Paleo-indians-Latin America-Pacific Coast. 2. Pacific Coast (Latin America)-Antiquities. 1. Blake, Michael, 1953­ . E65.P12 1999 911 '.8'091823-dc21 98-43834 ClF 8 Precolumbian Fishing on the Pacific Coast of Panama Richard G. Cooke and Anthony 1. Ranere Introduction: Estuarine skeletons in ontogenetic series (i.e., representing different Fishing in the Eastern Tropical Pacific life stages) in order to identify their ichthyofaunas to the satisfaction of the archaeologists who recover them so It is well known that the productivity, biotic diversity and painstakingly in the field. Objective interpretation of geological heterogeneity of large estuary-lagoon systems human exploitation requires baseline biological data on how along the Pacific coast of tropical America were causally individual species behave and are distributed in the many related to the precocity and intensity of sedentism and different sectors of an estuary.
    [Show full text]
  • Resuspended Intertidal Microphytobenthos As Major Diet Component of Planktivorous Atlantic Anchoveta Cetengraulis Edentulus (E
    ECOTROPICA 14: 121–128, 2008 © Society for Tropical Ecology RESUSPENDED INTERTIDAL MICROPHYTOBENTHOS AS MAJOR DIET COMPONENT OF PLANKTIVOROUS ATLANTIC ANCHOVETA CETENGRAULIS EDENTULUS (ENGRAULIDAE) FROM EQUATORIAL MANGROVE CREEKS Uwe Krumme1*, Heike Keuthen2, Mario Barletta3, Ulrich Saint-Paul1 & Wolfgang Villwock2 1 Center for Tropical Marine Ecology (ZMT), Fahrenheitstr. 6, 28359 Bremen, Germany. 2 Zoological Institute and Zoological Museum, University of Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany. 3 Laboratory of Ecology and Management of Estuarine and Coastal Ecosystems, Departemento de Oceanografia – UFPE, Cidade Universitaria, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil Abstract. In the present study we examined the stomach contents of 49 Atlantic anchoveta, Cetengraulis edentulus (Engrau- lidae), caught with a block net from intertidal mangrove creeks at diurnal neap tides between June and September 1997 near Bragança (Pará, northern Brazil). On average the fish had eaten 0.53 % ± 0.35 SD of their wet weight, with fuller stomachs in June/July. Cetengraulis edentulus is a phytoplanktivorous filter-feeder. The principal food was composed of about half pelagic and half benthic diatoms, predominantly within a 20 to 200 µm size range. Coscinodiscus, other centric diatoms, and Nitzschia were abundant in the diet throughout the sample period. Sediment particles and detritus were also ingested. Our observations suggest that foraging occurs close to the substrate and throughout the water column in shallow turbid waters. The study indicates the importance of intertidal microphytobenthos production during low tide being made available to transient planktivorous fish at high tide by tidal resuspension. Atlantic anchoveta may occupy a central position in the food web of many Neotropical mangrove ecosystems along the Atlantic coast.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mtieucanjmllsellm
    A MtieucanJMllsellm PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N. Y. I0024 NUMBER 24 I 0 MARCH 25, I970 The Hyobranchial Apparatus of Teleostean Fishes of the Families Engraulidae and Chirocentridae BY GARETH J. NELSON1 In a previous study of the gill arches of teleostean fishes of the family Clupeidae, the writer defined certain phyletic trends, and on this basis erected an hypothesis of the phyletic interrelationships of the currently recognized subfamilies (Nelson, 1967a, fig. 9). To check these results, study of the gill arches is extended, in the present paper, to the families Engraulidae and Chirocentridae, which probably include the nearest Recent relatives of the Clupeidae. In addition, the structure of the branchiostegal apparatus is reviewed for all three families. On the basis of the new data, it is possible to arrive at a more precise conception of the phyletic interrelationships of the main groups of clupeiform fishes, and to propose a revised higher classification: ORDER CLUPEIFORMES SUBORDER DENTICIPITOIDEI SUBORDER CLUPEOIDEI SUPERFAMILY CHIROCENTROIDAE SUPERFAMILY ENGRAULOIDAE SUPERFAMILY PRISTIGASTEROIDAE SUPERFAMILY CLUPEOIDAE 1 Assistant Curator, Department of Ichthyology, the American Museum of Natural History. 2 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES NO. 2410 MATERIAL AND METHODS Specimens available included representatives of virtually all genera commonly recognized (e.g., by Norman, 1957; Hildebrand, 1943, 1963a, 1963b; Svetovidov, 1963; Whitehead, 1968a). They were generally small- to-medium adults. The hyobranchial apparatus was dissected as a unit from a given specimen, stained with alizarin (in aqueous 2% potassium hydroxide), and cleaned and examined under a binocular microscope. Drawings were prepared either freehand, with the aid of an ocular micrometer, or by tracing from photographs.
    [Show full text]
  • SYNOPSIS of BIOLOGICAL DATA on the ANCHOVETA Cetengraulis Mysticetus Günther, 1866
    FAO Fisheries Synopsis No. 43 FRm/S43 (Distribution restricted) SAST - Anchoveta - 1,21(06),015,03 SYNOPSIS OF BIOLOGICAL DATA ON THE ANCHOVETA Cetengraulis mysticetus Günther, 1866 Prepared by W.H. Bayliff FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 1969 DOCUMENTS OF THE FISHERY DOCUMENTS DE LA DIVISION DOCUMENTOS DELA DIRECCION RESOURCES AND EXPLOITATION DES RESSOURCES ET DE L'EX- DE RECURSOS PESQUEROS Y EX- DIVISION OF FAO DEPARTMENT PLOITATION PES PECHES DU DE- PLOTACION DEL DEPARTAMENTO OF FISHERIES PARTEMENT DES PECHES DE LA DE PESCA DE LA FAO FAO Documents whicharenotofficial Des documents qui ne figurent pas Esta Subdirección publica varias se- FAO publications are issued in several parmi les publications officielles de Ia ries de documentos que no pueden series.They aregiven arestricted FAO sont publiés dans diverses séries. considerarse como publicacionesofi- distribution andthisfactshould be lis font seulement l'objet d'une distri- ciales de la FAO. Todos ellos tienen indicatedifthey are cited. Most of butionrestreinte, aussi convient-il de distribución limitada, circunstancia que them are prepared as working papers le préciser lorsque ces documnts sont debe indicarse en el caso de ser ci- for meetings, or are summaries of infor- cités.IIs'agit le plus souvent\ de do- tados. La mayoría de lostítulos que mationforuseof member govern- cuments de travail préparés pour des figuran endichas series son docu- ments,organizations,andspecialists réunions, ou de résumés d'information mentos de trabajopreparadospara concerned. àl'intention des gouvernements des reuniones o resúmenes de información pays membres, ainsi que des organi- destinadosalos estados miembros, sations et spécialistes intéressés. Ces organizaciones y especialistasintere- séries sont les suivantes: sados.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Program
    Western Society of Naturalists 101st Meeting Program Western Society of Naturalists ~ 2020 ~ Secretariat Chris Harley Patrick Martone Mary O’Connor Depts. Of Botany and Zoology University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC V6T1z4 Francis Janes UVIC [email protected] 101ST ANNUAL MEETING NOVEMBER 5 - NOVEMBER 8 2020 VIRTUAL MEETING 2 Welcome to the 101st Annual Meeting of the Western Society of Naturalists! WSN’s roots can be traced back to 1910 when a group of biologists, concerned about the lack of scientific meetings on the west coast, formed the Biological Society of the Pacific (call this our larval phase). The BSP was intended to include “any person interested in scientific work of a research nature.” In 1915, the American Society of Naturalists invited the BSP to join as a Pacific chapter under the ASN banner. Although the BSP voted in favor, the merger was eventually rejected by the ASN Executive Committee, who felt that we might not be sufficiently selective in admitting members. Through this process, the BSP formally metamorphosed into the Western Society of Naturalists in 1916. The first annual meeting of the society that would become WSN featured four scientific presentations and a dinner. Since then, our meetings and our society have grown substantially, but we still proudly welcome everyone who is interested in scientific work of a research nature. This year, we celebrate our 101st meeting. The circumstances are unusual, we are in the midst of a global pandemic, and also in a period of increased commitment to our society’s diversity, equity and inclusion of all naturalists.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversidad Y Conservación Biodiversity and Conservation
    SAN BASILIO BIODIVERSIDAD Y CONSERVACIÓN BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION SULA VANDERPLANK, FABIO FAVORETTO ISMAEL MASCAREÑAS & OCTAVIO ABURTO Página de derechos de autor 2020 / Copyright page 2020 Cómo citar: Vanderplank, S., F. Favoretto, Mascareñas, I. y O. Aburto. 2020. San Basilio: Biodiversidad y Conservación / Biodiversidad y Conservación. ISBN: 978-0-578-71118-8. 164 páginas. How to cite: Vanderplank, S., F. Favoretto, Mascareñas, I. & O. Aburto. 2020. San Basilio: Biodiversidad y Conservación/Biodiversity and Conservation. ISBN: 978-0-578-71118-8. 164 pages. Revisor de textos / Copy editor: Traductor / Translator: Karen Levyszpiro Diseñador / Designer: Amanda González Moreno Publicado por / Published by: International Community Foundation Imagen de la portada / Cover image credit: Bahía de San Basilio, Alan Harper Barra superior, der. a izq. / Top row, left to right: Callisaurus draconoides, Brad Hollingsworth; Mammillaria dioica ssp. dioica, Sophie Winitsky; Ramiro Arcos Aguilar; Micrathene whitneyi, Elia Benítez; Coreocarpus parthenioides var. parthenioides, Isaí Domínguez. Imagen de la contraportada / Backcover image credit: Bahía de San Basilio, Alan Harper Barra superior, der. a izq. / Top row, left to right: Lepus californicus, Kevin Clark; Alan Harper; Danaus gilippus, Elia Benítez; Orcinus orca, Diego Gamero. Primera impresión: copias 200, 2020 First printing: 200 copies, 2020 DER / RIGHT: Benigno Guerrero Vanderplank, Favoretto, Mascareñas & Aburto · 1 Alan Harper RESUMEN EJECUTIVO La bahía de San Basilio, Baja California Sur, es inmedia- y áreas de nueva colonización que ocurren por encima tamente notable para cualquier visitante por su impre- de la línea actual de flotación. Las riquezas biológicas de sionante paisaje y la heterogeneidad de los accidentes San Basilio siguen amenazadas. La biodiversidad en la geográficos y hábitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Importancia Topológica De Especies Carismáticas Y Comerciales En Una Red Trófica Del Golfo De California
    INSTITUTO POLITECNICO NACIONAL CENTRO INTERDISCIPLINARIO DE CIENCIAS MARINAS IMPORTANCIA TOPOLÓGICA DE ESPECIES CARISMÁTICAS Y COMERCIALES EN UNA RED TRÓFICA DEL GOLFO DE CALIFORNIA TESIS QUE PARA OBTENER EL GRADO DE MAESTRO EN CIENCIAS EN MANEJO DE RECURSOS MARINOS PRESENTA RUBÉN OLMO GILABERT LA PAZ, B.C.S., DICIEMBRE DEL 2017 DEDICATORIA Dedico este trabajo a todas las personas inconformistas, rebeldes y críticas que hacen que la humanidad avance éticamente. Para que la ciencia y la filosofía nos guíen en el desarrollo social y económico y para que los adultos recuperemos la curiosidad y la creatividad de los niños. Dedicado especialmente a mi sobrina Inés, ya que esta maestría, aunque muy provechosa, me separó de ella en sus primeros pasos. Espero recuperar el tiempo “perdido”, ya que la vista y el pelo perdido en estos bonitos dos años ya no volverán. Deseando lo mejor para mi hermana en la víspera del nacimiento de Julia. Dedicado también a mi familia porque sienten cada decisión y confían en mi forma de ser un tanto peculiar, porque se emocionan con cada logro. Y para mi madre, porque crecemos juntos desde hace mucho tiempo, nunca olvido nuestra frase: “Ningún camino fácil te hará llegar a algún lugar que merezca la pena” Y para mis mejores amigos que ya saben ellos quienes son y los he hechado de menos en este tiempo. Con ganas de chelas y tapas. AGRADECIMIENTOS A mi director, el Dr. Navia, director, profesor y mentor. Gracias Andrés por tu exigencia porque me hizo crecer y sacar lo mejor. Exigencia justificada con tu ejemplo, tu crítica constructiva y respetuosa y tu paciencia.
    [Show full text]