DOCSLIB.ORG

National Park Service U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Park Service U.S National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Glen Canyon National Recreation Area Visitor Study Fall 2016 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of Lake Powell in Glen Canyon NRA Photograph courtesy of Glen Canyon NRA ON THE COVER Historic photograph of Lake Powell Photograph courtesy of Glen Canyon NRA Glen Canyon National Recreation Area Visitor Study Fall 2016 Lena Le, Matthew Strawn, and Kristen Petersen Social and Economic Sciences Research Center Washington State University Wilson-Short Hall # 133 Pullman, WA 99164-4014 January 2018 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service The study was conducted via a collaborative agreement between the National Park Service and Washington State University (CESU Task Agreement # P15AC00089). Survey questionnaire and protocols were approved by Office of Management Budget approval # 1024-0224. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available in digital format from the Social and Economic Sciences Research Center website (https://sesrc.wsu.edu/), and the Natural Resource Publications Management website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/nrpm/). To receive this report in a format optimized for screen readers, please email [email protected]. Please cite this publication as: Le, Y. and Strawn, M. 2017. Glen Canyon National Recreation Area Visitor Study: Fall 2016. Pullman, WA: Social and Economic Sciences Research Center at Washington State University. The “Summer survey” in this report refers to the Socioeconomic Monitoring Pilot study conducted by RSG in collaboration with the Social Science Branch, National Park Service. The full report can also be requested via Natural Resource Publications Management system. The Summer survey report should be cited as: Resource Systems Group (RSG). 2017. Glen Canyon National Recreation Area socioeconomic monitoring pilot implementation: Summer 2016. Natural Resource Report NPS/GLCA/NRR—2017/1520. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. The results in this report include unweighted frequencies of the Fall survey. If applicable, Fall survey results were also compared with unweighted frequencies of the Summer survey. ii Contents Page Contents ............................................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. xi Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................ xv About the Authors ........................................................................................................ xv Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 Presentation of the Results ........................................................................................ 2 Methods ................................................................................................................................ 3 Survey Design and Procedures ..................................................................................... 3 Sample size and sampling plan ................................................................................. 3 Questionnaire design ................................................................................................. 3 Survey procedure ...................................................................................................... 4 Data analysis ............................................................................................................. 4 Limitations ................................................................................................................. 5 Checking non-response bias ..................................................................................... 6 Results ................................................................................................................................. 7 Group and Visitor Characteristics ................................................................................... 7 Visitor group size ....................................................................................................... 7 Number of adults and children ................................................................................... 8 Visitor group type ....................................................................................................... 9 Visitors with organized groups ................................................................................. 10 United States visitors by state of residence ............................................................. 12 Visitors from counties in Utah .................................................................................. 14 International visitors by country of residence ........................................................... 14 Number of visits to park in the past 12 months ........................................................ 15 Number of visits to other national parks in the past 12 months ................................ 16 Visitor age ............................................................................................................... 17 Visitor gender .......................................................................................................... 18 Visitors of Hispanic/Latino ethnicity ......................................................................... 18 iii Visitor race .............................................................................................................. 19 Visitor language preference ..................................................................................... 20 Visitor level of education .......................................................................................... 22 Park Specific Management Considerations .................................................................. 23 Visitor awareness of park management ................................................................... 23 Visitor aware of rules/regulations ............................................................................. 24 Trip/Visit Characteristics and Preferences ................................................................... 27 Information sources prior to visit .............................................................................. 27 Forms of transportation used to travel to park ......................................................... 31 Number of vehicles used to travel to park ................................................................ 32 Parking problems experienced during this visit ........................................................ 33 Willingness to park at a designated area and ride a shuttle ..................................... 33 Length of stay .......................................................................................................... 34 Overnight accommodations/lodging ......................................................................... 35 Number of nights in the area ................................................................................... 36 Locations visited inside the park .............................................................................. 44 Activities participated in this visit.............................................................................. 45 Most important activity this visit ............................................................................... 49 Visitors with a physical condition ............................................................................. 51 Importance of facilities ............................................................................................. 53 Use of facilities ........................................................................................................ 55 Quality of facilities used ........................................................................................... 56 Importance of services ............................................................................................ 61 Use of services ........................................................................................................ 63 Quality of services used........................................................................................... 64 Additional services or facilities ................................................................................. 67 Importance of attributes and resources ................................................................... 69 Likelihood of visiting park in future ........................................................................... 71 Interpretive program /information services desired in future .................................... 73 Visitor Comment Summaries ....................................................................................... 74 iv What visitor groups like most and least ................................................................... 74 Overall quality .......................................................................................................... 81 References ........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PRELUDE to SEVEN SLOTS: FILLING and SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION of SEVEN BROAD CANYONS in the NAVAJO SANDSTONE, SOUTH-CENTRAL UTAH by David B
    PRELUDE TO SEVEN SLOTS: FILLING AND SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION OF SEVEN BROAD CANYONS IN THE NAVAJO SANDSTONE, SOUTH-CENTRAL UTAH by David B. Loope1, Ronald J. Goble1, and Joel P. L. Johnson2 ABSTRACT Within a four square kilometer portion of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, seven distinct slot canyons cut the Jurassic Navajo Sandstone. Four of the slots developed along separate reaches of a trunk stream (Dry Fork of Coyote Gulch), and three (including canyons locally known as “Peekaboo” and “Spooky”) are at the distal ends of south-flowing tributary drainages. All these slot canyons are examples of epigenetic gorges—bedrock channel reaches shifted laterally from previous reach locations. The previous channels became filled with alluvium, allowing active channels to shift laterally in places and to subsequently re-incise through bedrock elsewhere. New evidence, based on optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) ages, indicates that this thick alluvium started to fill broad, pre-existing, bedrock canyons before 55,000 years ago, and that filling continued until at least 48,000 years ago. Streams start to fill their channels when sediment supply increases relative to stream power. The following conditions favored alluviation in the study area: (1) a cooler, wetter climate increased the rate of mass wasting along the Straight Cliffs (the headwaters of Dry Fork) and the rate of weathering of the broad outcrops of Navajo and Entrada Sandstone; (2) windier conditions increased the amount of eolian sand transport, perhaps destabilizing dunes and moving their stored sediment into stream channels; and (3) southward migration of the jet stream dimin- ished the frequency and severity of convective storms.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Report: Grand Staircase-Escalante National
    CONTENTS 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Scoping Process ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Purpose of Scoping ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Scoping Outreach .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.2.1 Publication of the Notice of Intent ....................................................................................... 3 2.2.2 Other Outreach Methods ....................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Opportunities for Public Comment ................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Public Scoping Meetings .................................................................................................................. 4 2.5 Cooperating Agency Involvement ................................................................................................... 4 2.6 National Historic Preservation Act and Tribal Consultation ....................................................... 5 3 Submission Processing and Comment Coding .................................................................................... 5
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 40 Number 4 Article 2 12-31-1980 Terrestrial vertebrate fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin N. Duane Atwood U.S. Forest Service, Provo, Utah Clyde L. Pritchett Brigham Young University Richard D. Porter U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Provo, Utah Benjamin W. Wood Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Atwood, N. Duane; Pritchett, Clyde L.; Porter, Richard D.; and Wood, Benjamin W. (1980) "Terrestrial vertebrate fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 40 : No. 4 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol40/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. TERRESTRIAL VERTEBRATE FAUNA OF THE KAIPAROWITS BASIN N. Diiane Atwood', Clyde L. Pritchctt', Richard D. Porter', and Benjamin W. Wood' .\bstr^ct.- This report inehides data collected during an investigation by Brighani Young University personnel to 1976, as well as a literature from 1971 review. The fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin is represented by 7 species of salamander, toads, mnphihians (1 5 and 1 tree frog), 29 species of reptiles (1 turtle, 16 lizards, and 12 snakes), 183 species of birds (plus 2 hypothetical), and 74 species of mammals. Geographic distribution of the various species within the basin are discussed. Birds are categorized according to their population and seasonal status.
    [Show full text]
  • Map Showing Location of Selected Surface-Water Sites and Springs, Escalante River Drainage Basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah By
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 2004–5223 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, GRAND STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE NATIONAL MONUMENT Location of selected surface-water sites and springs, Escalante River drainage basin—Plate 1 Wilberg, D.E., and Stolp, B.J., 2004, Seepage Investigation and Selected Hydrologic Data for the Escalante River Drainage Basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah, 1909-2002 111°45' 111°05' 114 ° 113 ° 112 ° 111° 42 ° T. 30 S. T. 31 S. Great 15 Salt 110 ° 109 ° B 41 ° Lake ou Salt Lake City lde r M Provo ou 40 ° nt ain 39 ° Utah Study 38 ° area Garfield County Kane County 37 ° E a s t F o T. 31 S. r k T. 32 S. 21 East Fork Boulder Creek near Boulder EXPLANATION B o u Boundary of study area l d u e s Platea r Aquariu C r Boundary of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument e e k Road k e e r C C ir Stream c r e le e C D l 16 38°00' if Surface-water site and number k fs or 22 East Fork Deer Creek near Boulder t F 38°00' as Spring E +35 Mile marker—Labeled every 5 miles T. 32 S. T. 33 S. 12 Dixie National Forest s il n a i Tr a t n p u o Boulder rr o T u B M n i f f i D r e e T. 33 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon National Park
    GRAND CANYON NATIONAL PARK • A R I Z 0 N A • UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Grand Canyon [ARIZONA] National Park United States Department of the Interior Harold L. Ickes, Secretary NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Arno B. Cammerer, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1936 Rules and Regulations A HE following summary of rules is intended as a guide for all park visitors. You are respectfully requested to facilitate the best in park administration by carefully observing the regulations. Complete regu­ lations may be seen at the office of the Superintendent. Preservation of 7\[atural Features The first law of a national park is preservation. Disturbance, injury, or destruction in any way of natural features, including trees, flowers, and other vegetation, rocks, and all wildlife, is strictly prohibited. Penalties are imposed for removing fossils and Indian remains, such as arrowheads, etc. Camps Camp or lunch only in designated areas. All rubbish that will burn should be disposed of in camp fires. Garbage cans are provided for noninflammable refuse. Wood and water are provided in all designated camp grounds. Fires Fires are absolutely prohibited except in designated spots. Do not go out of sight of your camp, even for a few moments, without making sure that your fire is either out entirely or being watched. Dogs, Cats, or other Domestic Animals Such animals are prohibited on Government lands within the park except as allowed through permission of the Superintendent, secured from park rangers at entrances. Automobiles The speed limit of 35 miles an hour is rigidly enforced.
    [Show full text]
  • Halls Crossing
    National Park Service Glen Canyon National Recreation Area U.S. Department of the Interior Rainbow Bridge National Monument Vol. 10, No. 1, 2014 The official newspaper PHOTO: Bob Moffitt Discover Glen Canyon Welcome! only 13% of Glen Canyon National Recreation overlooks. For spectacular views of the canyon Area. The impounded waters offer unparalleled country, those with 4-wheel drive vehicles Glen Canyon National Recreation Area’s varied water-based recreational opportunities where can visit less accessible areas of the park like expanses of land and water offer more than you can boat, swim, fish, water ski, camp or Alstrom Point or the Burr Trail, which begins you may think. As a unit of the National Park take a boat tour to Rainbow Bridge or Antelope in Glen Canyon and continues into Capitol Reef Service, Glen Canyon preserves and protects Canyon. National Park. over 1.2 million acres for scenic, scientific, and recreational values. Glen Canyon’s vast acreage You may be surprised to know that almost half With such recreational diversity and so many can be divided into three prominent land and of the park is managed as a proposed wilderness places to discover, visitors are often inspired to water areas, each of which offers distinct types area, meaning there is minimal development and return for further exploration. Whether it’s by of experiences for visitors from around the visitors can enjoy a more remote experience. boat, car, or foot, we invite you to experience all globe. that Glen Canyon National Recreation Area has The remainder of the park offers areas that to offer.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Historic Bridge Inventory | Pages 164-191
    NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet section number G, H page 156 V E H I C U L A R B R I D G E S I N A R I Z O N A Geographic Data: State of Arizona Summary of Identification and Evaluation Methods The Arizona Historic Bridge Inventory, which forms the basis for this Multiple Property Documentation Form [MPDF], is a sequel to an earlier study completed in 1987. The original study employed 1945 as a cut-off date. This study inventories and evaluates all of the pre-1964 vehicular bridges and grade separations currently maintained in ADOT’s Structure Inventory and Appraisal [SI&A] listing. It includes all structures of all struc- tural types in current use on the state, county and city road systems. Additionally it includes bridges on selected federal lands (e.g., National Forests, Davis-Monthan Air Force Base) that have been included in the SI&A list. Generally not included are railroad bridges other than highway underpasses; structures maintained by federal agencies (e.g., National Park Service) other than those included in the SI&A; structures in private ownership; and structures that have been dismantled or permanently closed to vehicular traffic. There are exceptions to this, however, and several abandoned and/or privately owned structures of particular impor- tance have been included at the discretion of the consultant. The bridges included in this Inventory have not been evaluated as parts of larger road structures or historic highway districts, although they are clearly integral parts of larger highway resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Linen, Section 2, G to Indians
    Arizona, Linen Radio Cards Post Card Collection Section 2—G to Indians-Apache By Al Ring LINEN ERA (1930-1945 (1960?) New American printing processes allowed printing on postcards with a high rag content. This was a marked improvement over the “White Border” postcard. The rag content also gave these postcards a textured “feel”. They were also cheaper to produce and allowed the use of bright dyes for image coloring. They proved to be extremely popular with roadside establishments seeking cheap advertising. Linen postcards document every step along the way of the building of America’s highway infra-structure. Most notable among the early linen publishers was the firm of Curt Teich. The majority of linen postcard production ended around 1939 with the advent of the color “chrome” postcard. However, a few linen firms (mainly southern) published until well into the late 50s. Real photo publishers of black & white images continued to have success. Faster reproducing equipment and lowering costs led to an explosion of real photo mass produced postcards. Once again a war interfered with the postcard industry (WWII). During the war, shortages and a need for military personnel forced many postcard companies to reprint older views WHEN printing material was available. Photos at 43%. Arizona, Linen Index Section 1: A to Z Agua Caliente Roosevelt/Dam/Lake Ajo Route 66 Animals Sabino Canyon Apache Trail Safford Arizona Salt River Ash Fork San Francisco Benson San Xavier Bisbee Scottsdale Canyon De Chelly Sedona/Oak Creek Canyon Canyon Diablo Seligman
    [Show full text]
  • 237 265 273 15 Staat Und Verwaltung Las Vegas Bis
    STAAT UND VERWALTUNG 15 HIGHLIGHTS 21 ROUTENÜBERSICHT 29 LAS VEGAS BIS ZION NATIONAL PARK 33 A ZION NATIONAL PARK BIS BRYCE CANYON NATIONAL PARK 57 B ÜBER DEN SCENIC BYWAY 12 ZUM CAPITOL REEF NATIONAL PARK 75 C CAPITOL REEF NATIONAL PARK ZUM LAKE POWELL UND MESA VERDE NATIONAL PARK 99 D MESA VERDE NATIONAL PARK ÜBER MONUMENT VALLEY ZURÜCK ZUM LAKE POWELL 133 E LAKE POWELL ZUM GRAND CANYON NATIONAL PARK 163 F GRAND CANYON NATIONAL PARK ÜBER DIE ROUTE 66 ZUM LAKE MEAD UND LAS VEGAS 203 G WISSENSWERTES MIT SPRACHHILFE 237 STICHWORTVERZEICHNIS 265 KARTEN 273 AUSZUG AUS NatioNalparkroute uSa – SüdweSt 3. auflage ISBN 978-3-943176-23-0 © 2012 Conbook Medien GmbH. Alle Rechte vorbehalten. NP_USA_Suedwest_Innen_20120314.indd 1 15.03.2012 11:01:04 ɻ INHALTSVERZEICHNIS (,1/(,781* � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 9 67$$781'9(5:$/781*86$ � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � +,*+/,*+76 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 5287(1h%(56,&+7 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Panaca 319 Uvada Springs . 56 Cedar Caliente P Beryl Jct. Newcastle City 143 318 93 M S Cedar A E B=,211$7,21$/3$5.%,6 Ash A 317 Enterprise Old Breaks NM Springs D Acoma Irontown Kanaraville O Ruins W Kolop Canyon %5<&(&$1<211$7,21$/3$5. � � 57 Alamo Elgin 15 V Veyo Zion A Pine L 18 Valley NP Cedar Breaks L Toquerville 9 E E Shivwits Spring- Y G dale R Carp N Hurricane National Monument . . A Santa Clara Rock- R Washington Desert St. George 59ville NWR N O Hildale Red Canyon . M Colorado City R Littlefield 399 Mormon O Mossy Cave . M Valley Wash Mesquite Pipe Spring 168 NM Bunkerville Moapa 15 Wolf Hole Bryce Canyon National Park .
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Trip Checklist
    Launch Date: ____________ Cliff Dwellers Date: _________ Confirmation # ___________ 12-DAY FULL CANYON OAR POWERED Pre-Trip Checklist Thank you for choosing Hatch River Expeditions for your Grand Canyon river rafting experience. We’re thrilled to have you aboard! However, booking your reservation is only the first step. Read over this packet and complete the items below to ensure that you’re ready for your expedition. ACCESS your Activity Manager & INVITE the other guests in your group (if any) to register under “Start Registration.” GO TO “View Info and Documents” & REVIEW our Policies, Physical Requirements, and Risk Advisory to Health-Care Providers and Participants. COMPLETE your registration under “Start Registration” & SIGN your Visitor’s Acknowledgement of Risk under “Sign Form.” PURCHASE Travel Insurance from Travel Insured (within 21 days) or from your preferred provider (by their deadline). BOOK any Transportation and Lodging you may need. (Your pre-trip lodging in Marble Canyon and post-trip flights to Las Vegas or Marble Canyon will be booked by Hatch.) MEET the folks who will be sharing your adventure on your trip’s social site in the “Photos” section of your Activity Manager. PAY the Remaining Balance for your trip – due to the Hatch office 120 days before your launch. REVIEW our Gear Checklist, begin acquiring items, and make sure to break in new purchases (especially shoes!). Optional: SUBMIT your Beverage Order Form directly to the Cliff Dwellers Lodge – due 6 weeks before your launch. Questions? If you can’t find the answer in this packet, check out the FAQs on hatchriverexpeditions.com! Still Stumped? Call or email our office: 800-856-8966 / [email protected] 12 DAY FULL CANYON OAR POWERED Policies Registration Forms Cancellations You must complete a Registration Form for every guest If you must cancel your reservation more than 120 on your reservation within 14 days of making your days before your trip, you must notify us in writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Monitoring for the Escalante River and Coyote Gulch in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area 2014 Summary Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Water Quality Monitoring for the Escalante River and Coyote Gulch in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area 2014 Summary Report Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SCPN/NRDS—2017/1134 ON THE COVER Water quality monitoring site ESC02 on the Escalante River in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. Photography by SCPN Water Quality Monitoring for the Escalante River and Coyote Gulch in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area 2014 Summary Report Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SCPN/NRDS—2017/1134 Melissa Dyer Stephen A. Monroe Stacy E. Stumpf National Park Service Southern Colorado Plateau Network 525 S. Beaver, Building 20 PO Box 5663 Flagstaff, AZ, 86011-5663 December 2017 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conserva- tion and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. Please direct any data requests to the water resources project manager or the SCPN data manager.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Invertebrates of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Cooperative Agreement Number JSA990024 Annual Report of Activities for 2000
    Aquatic Ecosystems and Invertebrates of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Cooperative Agreement Number JSA990024 Annual Report of Activities for 2000 Mark Vinson National Aquatic Monitoring Center Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Utah State University Logan, Utah 84322-5210 www.usu.edu/buglab 1 April 2001 i Table of contents Page Foreword ........................................................................... i Introduction ........................................................................ 1 Study area ......................................................................... 1 Long-term repeat sampling sites ........................................................ 2 Methods Locations and physical habitat ................................................... 3 Aquatic invertebrates Qualitative samples...................................................... 3 Quantitative samples ..................................................... 4 Laboratory methods ........................................................... 4 Results Sampling locations............................................................ 5 Habitat types................................................................. 6 Water temperatures ........................................................... 8 Aquatic invertebrates .......................................................... 8 Literature cited..................................................................... 13 Appendices 1. Aquatic invertebrates collected in the major habitats A. Alcove pools ......................................................
    [Show full text]