DOCSLIB.ORG

American Militarism in US Congress

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

American Militarism in US Congress: Another Military Transformation from the 103rd to the 112th Congress By [Copyright 2015] KeeHyun Ahn Submitted to the graduate degree program in the Department of Political Science and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Chairperson Mark R. Joslyn ________________________________ Co-chair Michael S. Lynch ________________________________ Don Haider-Markel ________________________________ Jiso Yoon ________________________________ Adrian R. Lewis Date Defended: March 26 2015 ii The Dissertation Committee for KeeHyun Ahn certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: American Militarism in US Congress: Another Military Transformation from the 103rd to the 112th Congress ________________________________ Chairperson Mark R. Joslyn ________________________________ Co-chair Michael S. Lynch Date approved: March 26 2015 iii Abstracts The armed forces are maintained in two ways –in both the military way and the militaristic way. In this sense, every nation which has its own military has specific features of militarism, regardless of how dominant these features are over other parts of the society. The U.S. has its own type of militarism in the military and the society. In the United States, there is a belief that the US military should be number one in the world. This American public belief takes various shapes of military imperatives which connect every part of society with military and lead them to cooperate and support the realization of these imperatives. In Part I, the dissertation shows that military transformation in the post-Cold War era is an example that shows how American militarism works in American society. During this period, public opinion showed a positive and significant correlation with defense spending. Within the US military, American Militarism has led the Department of Defense and military services to the endless preparation for a future adversary in the situation of strategic uncertainty after the Cold War era. Defense related industries have strongly supported the military’s effort to be number one in military affairs. In the political arena, the congressional committee which is responsible for national defense seems inclined to be conservative in the matter of ideology – more conservative than the median in the House of Representatives. In Part II, the dissertation explores how American Militarism has influenced on the decisions of each legislator in the roll call votes on amendments regarding defense authorizations and appropriations bills. The result reveals that authorization process is more predictable than appropriation process. Furthermore, the result shows that the amount of PAC contributions to each legislator is a significant factors to determine legislators’ choices in roll call votes in authorization process even though ideological aspect of individual legislators ideology is still influential in decision making of each legislator. iv Acknowledgments When I hesitated to jump in the journey, My Lord – Jesus Christ showed me the way to go. During the journey, my wife and son – Jisun and Joonmo – always stayed with me and encouraged me. They are my great partners of the journey. We are the best team ever. My parents supported the journey and prayed for their son and his team in a long distance. In the journey, I met Great mentors. My advisor, Professor Mark Joslyn, advised me to stay positive even during the most difficult period of the journey. Professor Michael Lynch showed me where and how to explore during the journey. Professor Adrian Lewis gave me a compass to sail in the ocean of military history. Pastor Lanny Maddux did not hesitate to read all the text and gave me advices for better English writing. v Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction: US Armed Forces, Defense Policy, Congress and military transformation ...........................................................................................1 1. Overview of the dissertation ...................................................................................... 3 2. Defense policy as a policy domain ........................................................................... 5 3. Military Transformation and American Militarism .......................................... 8 A. F-35: Product of Military Transformation after the Cold War ...............................10 4. Politics of Weapon Procurement Programs ....................................................... 11 5. Congressional Budgetary Process and Defense Acquisition ....................... 13 6. Summary ........................................................................................................................... 15 Part I. Politics of Military transformation after the Cold War .. 17 Chapter 2. Historical Overview of Military Transformation and Militarism ......................................................................................................................... 17 1. RMA, Military Transformation, Military Reform? ........................................... 18 2. Theories of Military Transformation .................................................................... 20 3. Militarism in the United States ................................................................................ 24 4. Social and Political Context of the Military Transformation: What is the background of the military transformation? ..................................................... 28 A. Congress ...........................................................................................................................................29 B. Public opinion ................................................................................................................................30 Chapter 3. Militarism and Military Transformation – The US Military .... 34 1. The Base Force Plan ..................................................................................................... 35 2. The Bottom-Up Review ............................................................................................... 39 3. The Reports of Quadrennial Defense Review 1997 ........................................ 44 4. The Reports of Quadrennial Defense Review 2001 ........................................ 48 vi 5. The Reports of Quadrennial Defense Review 2006 ........................................ 50 6. The Reports of Quadrennial Defense Review 2010 ......................................... 53 7. The Reports of Quadrennial Defense Review 2014 ......................................... 54 8. Summary ............................................................................................................................ 56 Chapter 4. Militarism and Military Transformation – Congress and Public ................................................................................................................................... 58 1. Committees’ Responses to Military Transformation ..................................... 60 2. House Armed Services Committee Composition .............................................. 93 3. Public Opinion on US military and Defense Budget ....................................... 97 4. Summary ........................................................................................................................... 108 Chapter 5. Militarism and Military Transformation – Defense Industries ................................................................................................................................ 112 1. JCIDS, DAP, and PPBES ............................................................................................. 112 2. Military Transformation and Defense Industries ........................................ 119 3. F-35 JSF Program: A legacy Jet Fighter or Representative of Military Transformation ........................................................................................................... 123 A. Why does F-35 matter? .............................................................................................123 B. F-35 as a weapon system .........................................................................................126 C. A-X/A/FX and MRF: the Origins of the F-35 ..........................................................127 D. JSAT and JSF: Joint-ness and Industrial Bases ........................................................129 E. The Fifth Generation Jet Fighter: where does it come from? ....................................131 F. Military Transformation, American Militarism and JSF F-35 Program ..................134 Part II. Congressional decision making process ............................ 142 vii Chapter 6: Congressional Decision-Making and Budgetary Process ..... 145 1. Defense Policy as a Federal Policy ...................................................................... 145 2. Congress as a Political Institution ........................................................................ 148 A. The Process in which a Bill Takes in House .............................................................148 B. Partisanship (Party politics) ......................................................................................152 C. Ideological Position of Individual Legislator................................................................. 153 D. Armed Services Committee and Economic Benefits ...................................................
Recommended publications
  • House State and Local Government Committee House Bill 195 – Women Veterans’ Day Sponsor Testimony 1 MAY 2019

    House State and Local Government Committee House Bill 195 – Women Veterans’ Day Sponsor Testimony 1 MAY 2019

    House State and Local Government Committee House Bill 195 – Women Veterans’ Day Sponsor Testimony 1 MAY 2019 Chair Perales, Vice Chair Hood, and members of the House Armed Services and Veterans Affairs Committee thank you for the opportunity to testify today regarding House Bill 195. And thank you to my joint sponsor, Assistant Majority Whip Lanese, for working with me on this important piece of legislation. While President Truman signed the Women’s Armed Services Integration Act in 1948, it would be 45-years before the Pentagon, under the direction of Defense Secretary Les Aspin, would lift the ban on women serving on combat aircraft and warships in 1993. It took time for Aspin’s directive to make an impact. It wasn’t until 1998 that female fighter pilots flew into combat for the first time as part of a four- day bombing campaign on Iraq and Kathleen McGrath became the first woman to command a Navy warship. In that same year, Heather Wilson—now Secretary of the Air Force—was elected to represent New Mexico’s First Congressional District, becoming the first female military veteran to complete a full term in Congress. It was a privilege of mine to intern for her. In 2005, Leigh Ann Hester, an Army National Guard soldier would become the first woman since the end of WWII to earn the Silver Star for her service after she outmaneuvered 50-insurgent fighters in Iraq, assaulting and clearing two trenches 8-years before Secretary Leon Panetta lifted the ban on women serving in combat altogether. This is not to say the progress women veterans have made have been limited to our most recent history.
  • ("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7

    ("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7

    COMPLAINT BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION CBHMISSIOAl INTRODUCTXON - 1 The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee ("DSCC") 7-_. J _j. c files this complaint seeking an immediate investigation by the 7 c; a > Federal Election Commission into the illegal spending A* practices of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee (WRSCIt). As the public record shows, and an investigation will confirm, the NRSC and a series of ostensibly nonprofit, nonpartisan groups have undertaken a significant and sustained effort to funnel "soft money101 into federal elections in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended or "the Act"), 2 U.S.C. 5s 431 et seq., and the Federal Election Commission (peFECt)Regulations, 11 C.F.R. 85 100.1 & sea. 'The term "aoft money" as ueed in this Complaint means funds,that would not be lawful for use in connection with any federal election (e.g., corporate or labor organization treasury funds, contributions in excess of the relevant contribution limit for federal elections). THE FACTS IN TBIS CABE On November 24, 1992, the state of Georgia held a unique runoff election for the office of United States Senator. Georgia law provided for a runoff if no candidate in the regularly scheduled November 3 general election received in excess of 50 percent of the vote. The 1992 runoff in Georg a was a hotly contested race between the Democratic incumbent Wyche Fowler, and his Republican opponent, Paul Coverdell. The Republicans presented this election as a %ust-win81 election. Exhibit 1. The Republicans were so intent on victory that Senator Dole announced he was willing to give up his seat on the Senate Agriculture Committee for Coverdell, if necessary.
  • The Occupied Clinic Militarism and Care in Kashmir / Saiba Varma the OCCUPIED CLINIC the Occupied Clinic

    The Occupied Clinic Militarism and Care in Kashmir / Saiba Varma the OCCUPIED CLINIC the Occupied Clinic

    The Occupied Clinic Militarism and Care in Kashmir / Saiba Varma THE OCCUPIED CLINIC The Occupied Clinic Militarism and Care in Kashmir • SAIBA VARMA DUKE UNIVERSITY PRESS DURHAM AND LONDON 2020 © 2020 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper ∞ Text design by Amy Ruth Buchanan Cover design by Courtney Leigh Richardson Typeset in Portrait by Copperline Book Services Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Names: Varma, Saiba, [date] author. Title: The occupied clinic : militarism and care in Kashmir / Saiba Varma. Description: Durham : Duke University Press, 2020. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers:lccn 2019058232 (print) | lccn 2019058233 (ebook) isbn 9781478009924 (hardcover) isbn 9781478010982 (paperback) isbn 9781478012511 (ebook) Subjects: lcsh: Psychiatric clinics—India—Jammu and Kashmir. | War victims—Mental health—India—Jammu and Kashmir. | War victims—Mental health services— India—Jammu and Kashmir. | Civil-military relations— India—Jammu and Kashmir. | Military occupation— Psychological aspects. Classification:lcc rc451.i42 j36 2020 (print) | lcc rc451.i42 (ebook) | ddc 362.2/109546—dc23 lc record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2019058232 isbn ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2019058233 Duke University Press gratefully acknowledges the Office of Vice Chancellor for Research at the University of California, San Diego, which provided funds toward the publication of this book. Cover art: Untitled, from The Depth of a Scar series. © Faisal Magray. Courtesy of the artist. For Nani, who always knew how to put the world back together CONTENTS MAP viii NOTE ON TRANSLITERATION ix ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xi LETTER TO NO ONE xv INTRODUCTION. Care 1 CHAPTER 1.
  • Microsoft Political Action Committee Federal Candidate Contributions 2010 January 1, 2010 – December 31, 2010

    Microsoft Political Action Committee Federal Candidate Contributions 2010 January 1, 2010 – December 31, 2010

    Microsoft Corporation Tel 425 882 8080 One Microsoft Way Fax 425 936 7329 Redmond, WA 98052-6399 http://www.microsoft.com/ Microsoft Political Action Committee Federal Candidate Contributions 2010 January 1, 2010 – December 31, 2010 Candidate State Office Sought Amount Ann Kirkpatrick (D) AZ US House $3,500 Atty. Gen. Jack Conway (D) KY US Senate $2,000 Baron P. Hill (D) IN US House $2,500 Bill Foster (D) IL US House $1,000 Blanche Lambert Lincoln (D) AR US Senate $9,000 Bob Etheridge (D) NC US House $2,000 Bobby Bright (D) AL US House $3,000 Charles A. Wilson, Jr. (D) OH US House $1,000 Charles Djou (R) HI US House $2,000 Christopher P. Carney (D) PA US House $2,000 Daniel Benjamin Maffei (D) NY US House $1,000 David R. Obey (D) WI US House $1,500 Deborah Halvorson (D) IL US House $1,000 Earl Pomeroy (D) ND US House $2,500 Elizabeth Helen Markey (D) CO US House $2,000 F. Allen Boyd, Jr. (D) FL US House $4,000 Frank Michael Kratovil, Jr. (D) MD US House $3,000 Frederick C. Boucher (D) VA US House $2,500 Glenn C. Nye (D) VA US House $4,000 Harry E. Mitchell (D) AZ US House $1,000 Ike Skelton (D) MO US House $2,000 John A. Boccieri (D) OH US House $1,000 John H. Adler (D) NJ US House $2,000 John M. Spratt, Jr. (D) SC US House $1,000 Lincoln Davis (D) TN US House $3,000 Melissa Luburich Bean (D) IL US House $1,000 Michael Angelo Arcuri (D) NY US House $2,000 Michael E.
  • Washington Update

    Washington Update

    WASHINGTON UPDATE A MONTHLY NEWSLETTER Vol 5 No 3 Published by the AUSA Institute of Land Warfare March 1993 PRESIDENT CLINTON'S ECONOMIC PLAN, ASPIN'S $10.8 BILLION BUDGET CUT hits the announced Feb. 17, calls for defense spending cuts of Army to the tune of $2.5 billion. The Army reportedly $127 billion in budget authority by 1997 from the pro­ met the Defense Secretary's Feb. 2 order to cut that posal of former President Bush. Details of just where the amount from a $64.1 billion proposed FY 1994 budget cuts will come must wait until release of the Clinton FY by offering to cancel a number of major weapons now in 1994 Defense budget-expected around the end of production or development and by accelerating the draw­ March. All that is known to date is that the President down of troops from Europe. How many of these will plans a 1.4 million active-duty force (vice Bush's 1.6 make it through the budget process is pure speculation at million); cuts the U.S. force in Europe to about 100,000, this point. The specific reductions won't be known until (Bush projected 150,000); freezes the SDI program at President Clinton sends his FY 1994 budget to Capitol $3.8 billion a year, (Bush saw $6.3 billion request for FY Hill (expected late March), but "Pentagon officials" have 1994 alone); and imposes a freeze on federal pay in­ commented in the media that the Army proposes to cut: creases in 1994 and limited raises thereafter.
  • The History and Politics of Defense Reviews

    The History and Politics of Defense Reviews

    C O R P O R A T I O N The History and Politics of Defense Reviews Raphael S. Cohen For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2278 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9973-0 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2018 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The 1993 Bottom-Up Review starts with this challenge: “Now that the Cold War is over, the questions we face in the Department of Defense are: How do we structure the armed forces of the United States for the future? How much defense is enough in the post–Cold War era?”1 Finding a satisfactory answer to these deceptively simple questions not only motivated the Bottom-Up Review but has arguably animated defense strategy for the past quarter century.
  • The Militarization of US Government Response to COVID-19 and What We Can Do About It About Face: Veterans Against the War March 23, 2020

    The Militarization of US Government Response to COVID-19 and What We Can Do About It About Face: Veterans Against the War March 23, 2020

    National Guard troops stand by as people wait to be tested for coronavirus in New Rochelle, New York, on March 13, 2020. Timothy A. Clary/AFP via Getty Images. The Militarization of US Government Response to COVID-19 and What We Can Do About It About Face: Veterans Against the War March 23, 2020 This statement was written by Drake Logan, a civilian ally to About Face, with input on content by About Face veteran members Lisa Ling, Krystal Two Bulls, Maggie Martin, Erica Manley, Shawn Fischer, Jovanni Reyes, Matt W. Howard, Derek S. Matthews, and Ramon Mejía. Editorial guidance was provided by Clare Bayard, civilian ally to About Face. Authorship is always collective. Summary: This document outlines six broad areas of current political need and opportunity as the US government ramps up the militarization of its response to the coronavirus epidemic. About Face is an organization of post-9/11 service-members and veterans who organize to end a foreign policy of permanent war and the use of military weapons, tactics, and values in communities across the United States. We present this statement in order to generate further conversation on these points both within and beyond our organization, as well as to enter the national media conversation on coronavirus response. Please reach out to About Face if you are a member or civilian who would like to be 1 involved in media work on these issues, or if you would like to help create further independent media. We need to begin by tackling these six areas of political need and opportunity in the time of coronavirus: (1) We need to engage in and spread praxes of community-based defense instead of militarized security.
  • 9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp

    9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp

    Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page i THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page v CONTENTS List of Illustrations and Tables ix Member List xi Staff List xiii–xiv Preface xv 1. “WE HAVE SOME PLANES” 1 1.1 Inside the Four Flights 1 1.2 Improvising a Homeland Defense 14 1.3 National Crisis Management 35 2. THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEW TERRORISM 47 2.1 A Declaration of War 47 2.2 Bin Ladin’s Appeal in the Islamic World 48 2.3 The Rise of Bin Ladin and al Qaeda (1988–1992) 55 2.4 Building an Organization, Declaring War on the United States (1992–1996) 59 2.5 Al Qaeda’s Renewal in Afghanistan (1996–1998) 63 3. COUNTERTERRORISM EVOLVES 71 3.1 From the Old Terrorism to the New: The First World Trade Center Bombing 71 3.2 Adaptation—and Nonadaptation— ...in the Law Enforcement Community 73 3.3 . and in the Federal Aviation Administration 82 3.4 . and in the Intelligence Community 86 v Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page vi 3.5 . and in the State Department and the Defense Department 93 3.6 . and in the White House 98 3.7 . and in the Congress 102 4. RESPONSES TO AL QAEDA’S INITIAL ASSAULTS 108 4.1 Before the Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania 108 4.2 Crisis:August 1998 115 4.3 Diplomacy 121 4.4 Covert Action 126 4.5 Searching for Fresh Options 134 5.
  • CFIUS Releases Final FIRRMA Regulations

    CFIUS Releases Final FIRRMA Regulations

    ALERT MEMORANDUM CFIUS Releases Final FIRRMA Regulations January 22, 2020 If you have any questions concerning On January 13, 2020, the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) this memorandum, please reach out to released final regulations (the “Final Regulations”)1 implementing the your regular firm contact or the updates to the foreign investment review process of the Committee on following authors. Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”) contained in the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 WASHINGTON (“FIRRMA”). The Final Regulations, effective February 13, 2020, Paul Marquardt +1 202 974 1648 largely track the September 2019 proposed regulations (the “Proposed [email protected] Regulations”)2 to implement FIRRMA’s expansion of CFIUS’s jurisdiction. FIRRMA in turn codified existing CFIUS practice as it has John McGill +1 202 974 1625 evolved in recent years, particularly with respect to a focus on U.S. [email protected] businesses involving critical technologies, critical infrastructure, and sensitive personal data, and added a limited mandatory filing regime. The Nathanael Kurcab +1 202 974 1652 Final Regulations continue this incremental path by incorporating [email protected] revisions to address issues arising from public comments on the Proposed Regulations and the sunset of the CFIUS pilot program rules (the “Pilot Sameer Jaywant 3 +1 202 974 1882 Program”). [email protected] The Final Regulations apply to all transactions entered into (binding Hani Bashour +1 202 974 1934 agreement signed, public offer launched, proxies solicited, or options [email protected] exercised) after February 13, 2020. An interim rule defining an entity’s “principal place of business” is concurrently effective and open for comment until February 18, 2020.
  • The German Military and Hitler

    The German Military and Hitler

    RESOURCES ON THE GERMAN MILITARY AND THE HOLOCAUST The German Military and Hitler Adolf Hitler addresses a rally of the Nazi paramilitary formation, the SA (Sturmabteilung), in 1933. By 1934, the SA had grown to nearly four million members, significantly outnumbering the 100,000 man professional army. US Holocaust Memorial Museum, courtesy of William O. McWorkman The military played an important role in Germany. It was closely identified with the essence of the nation and operated largely independent of civilian control or politics. With the 1919 Treaty of Versailles after World War I, the victorious powers attempted to undercut the basis for German militarism by imposing restrictions on the German armed forces, including limiting the army to 100,000 men, curtailing the navy, eliminating the air force, and abolishing the military training academies and the General Staff (the elite German military planning institution). On February 3, 1933, four days after being appointed chancellor, Adolf Hitler met with top military leaders to talk candidly about his plans to establish a dictatorship, rebuild the military, reclaim lost territories, and wage war. Although they shared many policy goals (including the cancellation of the Treaty of Versailles, the continued >> RESOURCES ON THE GERMAN MILITARY AND THE HOLOCAUST German Military Leadership and Hitler (continued) expansion of the German armed forces, and the destruction of the perceived communist threat both at home and abroad), many among the military leadership did not fully trust Hitler because of his radicalism and populism. In the following years, however, Hitler gradually established full authority over the military. For example, the 1934 purge of the Nazi Party paramilitary formation, the SA (Sturmabteilung), helped solidify the military’s position in the Third Reich and win the support of its leaders.
  • Cities Under Siege: the New Urban Militarism by Stephen Graham

    Cities Under Siege: the New Urban Militarism by Stephen Graham

    Stirling International Journal of Postgraduate Research 1.2 (2013) Cities under Siege: The New Urban Militarism by Stephen Graham London: Verso, 2011. 402 pp plus introduction. ISBN 978-1-84467-762-7 (pbk) £14.99 As a historian who spends far too little time focusing on the here and now, but with a strong historical interest in the use of city and space in representations of authority, I was intrigued and excited at the opportunity to read Stephen Graham’s exposé on the modern cities and new urban militarism, particularly since the back cover acclamations promised ‘a rigorously, pioneering book’. Although the book is indeed interesting and opened my eyes to a number of things, unfortunately, there are a number of disappointments in store for readers. The book is long, and with over 400 pages of text to plough through it gives the average historical monograph a run for its money, even though as an academic field we are known for weighty door-stop volumes! Graham breaks the information down into ten chapters plus an introduction and the chapters are subsequently divided into shorter, more approachable sections. The introduction gives some key features of urban militarism/ military urbanism – most useful to a more general reader – as well as a breakdown of his approach and central goal: to reconcile the current split in the study of cities, which is divided between discussions of security, international 1 Stirling International Journal of Postgraduate Research 1.2 (2013) politics, and issues of urban security, and the debates regarding the impact of change on urban life studied in geography, architecture and anthropology.
  • SELECT and SPECIAL COMMITTEES of the HOUSE Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence

    SELECT and SPECIAL COMMITTEES of the HOUSE Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence

    SELECT AND SPECIAL COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence H±405 The Capitol, phone 225±4121 [Created pursuant to H. Res. 658, 95th Congress] Porter J. Goss, of Florida, Chairman. C.W. Bill Young, of Florida. Norman D. Dicks, of Washington. Jerry Lewis, of California. Julian C. Dixon, of California. Bud Shuster, of Pennsylvania. David E. Skaggs, of Colorado. Bill McCollum, of Florida. Nancy Pelosi, of California. Michael N. Castle, of Delaware. Jane Harman, of California. Sherwood L. Boehlert, of New York. Ike Skelton, of Missouri. Charles F. Bass, of New Hampshire. Sanford D. Bishop, of Georgia. Jim Gibbons, of Nevada. SUBCOMMITTEES Human Intelligence, Analysis and Counterintelligence Mr. McCollum, Chairman Mr. Shuster Mr. Skaggs Mr. Castle Mr. Dixon Mr. Bass Ms. Pelosi Mr. Bishop Technical and Tactical Intelligence Mr. Lewis, Chairman Mr. Young Mr. Dicks Mr. Boehlert Mr. Skaggs Mr. Gibbons Ms. Harman Mr. Skelton STAFF Chief Counsel.ÐPatrick B. Murray. Deputy Chief Counsel.ÐChristopher Barton. Democratic Counsel.ÐMichael W. Sheehy, 5±7690. Chief Clerk.ÐLydia M. Olson. Staff Director.ÐJohn I. Millis. Staff Assistants: Christopher Baugh, Anne Fogarty, Delores Jackson, Ilene Romack, 5±7690; Kelli Short. Chief of Registry/Security.ÐMary Jane Maguire. Deputy Chief of Registry/Security.ÐWilliam McFarland. Professional Staff: Catherine D. Eberwein, Mary Engebreth,L. Christine Healey, 5±7690; Calvin Humphrey, 5±7690; Kenneth M. Kodama, 5±7690; T. Kirk McConnell, 5±7690; Michael C. Meermans, Thomas Newcomb, Susan M. Ouellette, Diane S. Roark, Timothy R. Sample, Wendy Selig. Speaker's Designee.ÐGardner Peckham. Minority Leader's Designee.ÐBrett O'Brien, 5±7690.