DOCSLIB.ORG

Statistical Study of Rock Drilling by Hypervelocity Jets from Explosive Shaped Charges

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Statistical Study of Rock Drilling by Hypervelocity Jets from Explosive Shaped Charges Scholars' Mine Doctoral Dissertations Student Theses and Dissertations 1971 Statistical study of rock drilling by hypervelocity jets from explosive shaped charges John William Brown Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/doctoral_dissertations Part of the Mining Engineering Commons Department: Mining Engineering Recommended Citation Brown, John William, "Statistical study of rock drilling by hypervelocity jets from explosive shaped charges" (1971). Doctoral Dissertations. 1850. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/doctoral_dissertations/1850 This thesis is brought to you by Scholars' Mine, a service of the Missouri S&T Library and Learning Resources. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STATISTICAL STUDY OF ROCK DRILLING BY HYPERVELOCITY JETS FROM EXPLOSIVE SHAPED CHARGES by JOHN WILLIAM BROWN, 19 42- A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-ROLLA In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in T2608 164 pages MINING ENGINEERING c.l 1971 &~£~ £i?L;;~~ 202886 @ 1972 JOHM WILLIAM BROWN ALL RIGHI'S RESERVED iii STATISTICAL STUDY OF ROCK DRILLING BY HYPERVELOCITY JETS FROM EXPLOSIVE SHAPED CHARGES ABSTRACT The drilling effect in rock of hypervelocity jets from explosive shaped charges was investigated experimentally to supplement a rapid excavation concept. The effects of the design factors of the charge and the mechanical properties of eight rock types were studied. Experiments were both designed and analyzed upon statistical principles. A full factorial experimental design was used for each of seven rock types. An analysis of variance and the k-ratio least­ significant-difference test were applied to the results. The optimum design of shaped charges for drilling was found to be independent of rock type and rock properties. For composition C-4 charges having cast iron liners, the optimum design for depth of penetration includes a standoff distance equal to 1~ times the charge diameter, a liner wall thickness of 0.030 times the diameter, and a liner apex angle of 45 degrees. The penetration depth is directly proportional to the size of the charge, and increases significantly with length/diameter ratio of the charge. Drilled depth does not vary significantly between cylindrical and cylindro-conical shaped charges, nor between cast iron and Armco iron liners. Composition C-4 explosive produces significantly greater drilled depths than does 100 percent blasting gelatin, which in turn is obviously better than 67 percent dynamite. iv The penetration process in rock is partially hydrodynamic but not completely so. The hydrodynamic theory does not agree well with the experimentally-determined relationship of the depth, diameter, and volume of penetration to scaled values of the jet/rock density ratio. The complementary effects of additional rock properties must be included to produce agreement between theory and experiment. Those additional properties which are most probably related causally to penetration are compressive strength, porosity, hardness, drillability, and modulus of elasticity. The phenomenology of penetration in high­ strength rock is consistently different from low- and medium-strength rock in terms of penetration depth, hole taper, the presence of spalled craters, delayed spallation, microseismic activity, and partial filling of the hole and plating of its walls by liner material. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Dr. George B. Clark--his thesis advisor and the director of the Rock Mechanics and Explosives Research Center--who suggested the project, obtained contracts to support the investigations, and directed the overall research program. He also wishes to thank the following: Drs. Charles J. Haas, Peter G. Hansen, Ronald R. Rollins, James J. Scott, and David A. Summers, who served on his doctoral committee; Mr. Upendra Parikh, who produced the microphotographs; Messrs. Bradford Hale and Clarence Rapier, who machined the shaped-charge components; and Miss Gini Miller, who typed the thesis. He is also grateful for the assistance of many staff members of the University. The author particularly wishes to mention with affection the inspira­ tion provided by his children, John, Russell, and Debra. The experimentation reported in this dissertation was conducted from November, 1967, to May, 1970. The author deeply appreciates the funding of contracts by the Department of Defense and by E. I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company, Inc. He also wishes to thank the Department of Mining, Petroleum, and Geological Engineering for fellowships during two semesters of this period, and the Denver Mining Research Center of the U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, for the use of an electronic calculator. Some of the results of this investigation were presented at the Twelfth Symposium on Rock Mechanics at the University of Missouri-Rolla in November, 1970 (Clark, Rollins, Brown, and Kalia, 1971). vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .........................•................................. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............•........................•.............. · v LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS .•••..••••..•.•...•......••..•.•..•.....•...•.•. x LIST OF TABLES ••.••••..•••..•.•.••••......•••••.•.•••.....•.•....• xiii 1 . INTRODUCTION •..•.•..•.••••..•...•.•...•..••...•••...••.•......••. 1 2 . REVIEW OF LITERATURE ••.....•.•.•.••••••......•.•••...•••.....•.• 10 I • THEORY OF JET FORMATION •••..•.•••••••...•••••...••...•..•• 10 I I • THEORY OF PENETRATION BY JET •...••••••..•••...•...•.•...•. 11 I I I . PHENOMENOLOGY ••.•..•.•.••.•••.•...•.••..•...•..•.•.•..••.• 14 A. Metals •....•.••.••••..••..•.•.•.•..•............•.•. 14 B . Rock ••.••••.•....•••..••..••••.•....••....•.....•..• 18 IV. INFLUENCE OF TARGET PROPERTIES ON PENETRATION ••.•.....••.. 20 A • Me t a 1 s . ........ 2 0 B. Rock •••..•..•••..••.••...••••.••.•...••.••.•...••... 21 V. DESIGN FACTORS OF THE SHAPED CHARGE .....•••.••.•••.....•.• 21 A • Me t a 1 s . • • . • • . • • • . • • . • . • . • . • . • . • . • . • . 2 1 B • Rock •••.•.•..•.•............•.....•....•.......•.... 2 6 3. DESIGN OF INVESTIGATION .....•.••......•.•...••..•.•••......••••. 28 I. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN ....••...••..........••........•......• 28 A. Preliminary experiments •••..•••.•...•.•...•...•••... 28 B. Factorial experiments on standoff, liner angle, and liner thickness ....•.•••.•.•.•..•......••.....•. 29 C. Other design factors •...•••••.••.....•••.•......•.•• 32 II. PROCEDURE •.•.••••....•.•..•••••..•..•.•.•..•••••.••.•...•• 32 A. Construction of shaped charges •.••••••..••••.••.•••• 32 vii B. Shaped-charge drilling experiments ................. 34 C. Mechanical properties of rock ...................... 35 III. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS ..................................... 35 4. RESULTS ......................................................... 38 I. DRILLED DEPTH VERSUS STANDOFF, LINER ANGLE, AND LINER THICKNESS FROM FACTORIAL EXPERIMENTS ON SEVEN ROCK TYPES ........•................................ 38 A. Means for all rock types ........................... 59 B. Pooled data for seven rock types ................... 60 C. Missouri granite ................................... 60 D. Jefferson City dolomite ............................ 60 E. Bedford limestone .................................. 61 F . Berea sands tone .................................... 61 G. Kitledge granite ................................... 62 H. Jasper quartzite ................................... 62 I. Buena gabbro ....................................... 62 J. St. Peter sandstone ................................ 63 II. DRILLED DIAMETER AND VOLUME VERSUS STANDOFF, LINER ANGLE, AND LINER THICKNESS FROM FACTORIAL EXPERIMENTS ON SEVEN ROCK TYPES .......................... 63 III. DRILLED DEPTH, DIAMETER, AND VOLUME VERSUS OTHER DESIGN FACTORS ..................................... 6 3 A. Charge size ........................................ 63 B. Charge shape . ........ 6 9 c. Charge length ...................................... 71 D. Type of explosive .................................. 71 E. Type of liner metal ................................ 71 IV. DRILLED DEPTH, DIAMETER, AND VOLUME VERSUS ROCK PROPERTIES .......................................... 7 2 V . PHENOMENOLOGY ...•......•................................. 8 5 viii 5 . DISCUSS ION ....•................................................ 91 I. DRILLED DEPTH VERSUS STANDOFF, LINER ANGLE, AND LINER THICKNESS FROM FACTORIAL EXPERIMENTS ON SEVEN ROCK TYPES ......................................... 91 II. DRILLED DEPTH, DIAMETER, AND VOLUME VERSUS OTHER DESIGN FACTORS ..................................... 9 3 III. DRILLED DEPTH, DIAMETER, AND VOLUME VERSUS ROCK PROPERTIES •..........•.......................•...... 9 5 IV. PHENOMENOLOGY .........•.................................. 96 V. SHAPED-CHARGE MATERIALS .....•........................... 100 VI. ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH, AND SAFETY HAZARDS .............•. 101 6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ..•.............................•...... 104 I . SUMMARY •................................................ 104 II. CONCLUSIONS ...........•.•............................... 104 III. RECOMMENDED FURTHER RESEARCH ............................ 107 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY ...............•....•.........•...•.......... 110 VITA .............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Technical Note
    NASA TN D-1493 O5 C,/ 1-4 I Q LOAJN' ? < TECHNICAL NOTE D-1493 ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS OF SPACE FLIGHT STRUCTURES H. METEOROID HAZARD Prepared by John R. Davidson and Paul E. Sandorff in collaboration with the NASA Research Advisory Committee on Missile and Space Vehicle Structures Langley Research Center Langley Station, Hampton, Va. NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON January 1963 TECH LIBRARY KAFB, NM Illllllll TABLE OF CONTENTS 0153^57 Page PREFACE li MEMBERS OF THE NASA RESEARCH ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON MISSILE AND SPACE VEHICLE STRUCTURES in SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 1 SYMBOLS -. 2 METEOROID ENVIRONMENT ^ Asteroidal Particles ; . k Cometary Particles 5 Tektites 8 Pertubation Forces 9 Observations of Meteors From the Earth 10 Satellites and Space Probes 15 Research in Progress 18 INTERACTION BETWEEN METEOROID ENVIRONMENT AND STRUCTURE 19 Historical Aspects of the Plate Perforation Problem 19 Physical Description of High-Speed Impact Phenomena 20 Modern Theories of Penetration 22 Experimental Data .__ 26 PROTECTION METHODS 30 Types of Structural Damage 30 Application of Meteoroid Flux Data and Impact Data to Design Problems 30 RESEARCH IN PROGRESS 36 Ground Research 36 Flight Test Research 36 RECOMMENDED METEOROID RESEARCH PROGRAM 36 REFERENCES kO BIBLIOGRAPHY 1*7 TABLES 49 FIGURES 61 PREFACE The exploration, study, and definition of the environmental conditions which exist in space beyond the earth's atmosphere form an essential part of the current space-age effort. The development of this science is of especial interest to the vehicle structures designer, who must make decisions today that will establish the capability and efficiency of the space hardware in use 5 °r 10 years hence.
    [Show full text]
  • Viscosity from Newton to Modern Non-Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics
    Viscosity from Newton to Modern Non-equilibrium Statistical Mechanics S´ebastien Viscardy Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, 3, Avenue Circulaire, B-1180 Brussels, Belgium Abstract In the second half of the 19th century, the kinetic theory of gases has probably raised one of the most impassioned de- bates in the history of science. The so-called reversibility paradox around which intense polemics occurred reveals the apparent incompatibility between the microscopic and macroscopic levels. While classical mechanics describes the motionof bodies such as atoms and moleculesby means of time reversible equations, thermodynamics emphasizes the irreversible character of macroscopic phenomena such as viscosity. Aiming at reconciling both levels of description, Boltzmann proposed a probabilistic explanation. Nevertheless, such an interpretation has not totally convinced gen- erations of physicists, so that this question has constantly animated the scientific community since his seminal work. In this context, an important breakthrough in dynamical systems theory has shown that the hypothesis of microscopic chaos played a key role and provided a dynamical interpretation of the emergence of irreversibility. Using viscosity as a leading concept, we sketch the historical development of the concepts related to this fundamental issue up to recent advances. Following the analysis of the Liouville equation introducing the concept of Pollicott-Ruelle resonances, two successful approaches — the escape-rate formalism and the hydrodynamic-mode method — establish remarkable relationships between transport processes and chaotic properties of the underlying Hamiltonian dynamics. Keywords: statistical mechanics, viscosity, reversibility paradox, chaos, dynamical systems theory Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Irreversibility 3 2.1 Mechanics. Energyconservationand reversibility . ........................ 3 2.2 Thermodynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling and Mapping of the Structural Deformation of Large Impact Craters on the Moon and Mercury
    MODELING AND MAPPING OF THE STRUCTURAL DEFORMATION OF LARGE IMPACT CRATERS ON THE MOON AND MERCURY by JEFFREY A. BALCERSKI Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY August, 2015 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of Jeffrey A. Balcerski candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Committee Chair Steven A. Hauck, II James A. Van Orman Ralph P. Harvey Xiong Yu June 1, 2015 *we also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein ~ i ~ Dedicated to Marie, for her love, strength, and faith ~ ii ~ Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................1 2. Tilted Crater Floors as Records of Mercury’s Surface Deformation .....................4 2.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................5 2.2 Craters and Global Tilt Meters ................................................................8 2.3 Measurement Process...............................................................................12 2.3.1 Visual Pre-selection of Candidate Craters ................................13 2.3.2 Inspection and Inclusion/Exclusion of Altimetric Profiles .......14 2.3.3 Trend Fitting of Crater Floor Topography ................................16 2.4 Northern
    [Show full text]
  • GRAIL Gravity Observations of the Transition from Complex Crater to Peak-Ring Basin on the Moon: Implications for Crustal Structure and Impact Basin Formation
    Icarus 292 (2017) 54–73 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus GRAIL gravity observations of the transition from complex crater to peak-ring basin on the Moon: Implications for crustal structure and impact basin formation ∗ David M.H. Baker a,b, , James W. Head a, Roger J. Phillips c, Gregory A. Neumann b, Carver J. Bierson d, David E. Smith e, Maria T. Zuber e a Department of Geological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA b NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA c Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences and McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA d Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA e Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: High-resolution gravity data from the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission provide Received 14 September 2016 the opportunity to analyze the detailed gravity and crustal structure of impact features in the morpho- Revised 1 March 2017 logical transition from complex craters to peak-ring basins on the Moon. We calculate average radial Accepted 21 March 2017 profiles of free-air anomalies and Bouguer anomalies for peak-ring basins, protobasins, and the largest Available online 22 March 2017 complex craters. Complex craters and protobasins have free-air anomalies that are positively correlated with surface topography, unlike the prominent lunar mascons (positive free-air anomalies in areas of low elevation) associated with large basins.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Concept 3: Key Planetary
    Science Concept 6: The Moon is an Accessible Laboratory for Studying the Impact Process on Planetary Scales Science Concept 6: The Moon is an accessible laboratory for studying the impact process on planetary scales Science Goals: a. Characterize the existence and extent of melt sheet differentiation. b. Determine the structure of multi-ring impact basins. c. Quantify the effects of planetary characteristics (composition, density, impact velocities) on crater formation and morphology. d. Measure the extent of lateral and vertical mixing of local and ejecta material. INTRODUCTION Impact cratering is a fundamental geological process which is ubiquitous throughout the Solar System. Impacts have been linked with the formation of bodies (e.g. the Moon; Hartmann and Davis, 1975), terrestrial mass extinctions (e.g. the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary extinction; Alvarez et al., 1980), and even proposed as a transfer mechanism for life between planetary bodies (Chyba et al., 1994). However, the importance of impacts and impact cratering has only been realized within the last 50 or so years. Here we briefly introduce the topic of impact cratering. The main crater types and their features are outlined as well as their formation mechanisms. Scaling laws, which attempt to link impacts at a variety of scales, are also introduced. Finally, we note the lack of extraterrestrial crater samples and how Science Concept 6 addresses this. Crater Types There are three distinct crater types: simple craters, complex craters, and multi-ring basins (Fig. 6.1). The type of crater produced in an impact is dependent upon the size, density, and speed of the impactor, as well as the strength and gravitational field of the target.
    [Show full text]
  • 13. Martian Cratering and Implications for the Chronostratigraphy
    13. Martian Cratering and Implications for the Chronostratigraphy The record of large impact basins on differ- ent planetary bodies allows us to compare the characteristics of the heavy bombardment pe- riod and the end of planetary formation. Both the cratering record itself and the age distri- bution of the impact basins represent the pe- riod of highest impactor flux, decaying rapidly within the first half billion years of our solar system. In order to test the plausibility of the Martian chronology model (see Chapter 5), the ages of the large Martian impact basins, using the derived Martian production function, were determined and compared to lunar basin ages. For the Moon, the large basins were produced no later than about 3.8 to 3.9 Ga ago and a similar situation should exist for Mars, follow- ing the marker horizon idea (Wetherill, 1975). This idea is based on the assumption that solar system bodies have undergone a similar evo- lution since planetary formation. In the cra- Figure 13.1.: The crater size frequency distribu- tering record on any solid surface body, which tion measured for one of the oldest regions on Mars: has representative large old surface units, this Noachis Terra (map nomenclature: unit Npl1). first period of heavy bombardment is present in the general crater size–frequency distribution as well as the large basin record itself. According to our investigation, the oldest surface areas on than the visible highland surface, where crater Mars, roughly the Martian southern highlands, count ages are based on craters clearly recog- e. g. Noachis Terra, were formed between 4.0 nized by their morphology.
    [Show full text]
  • The George Wright Forum
    national park units A new method for setting preservation priorities Science vs. political interference in system planning What's a name worth? — The Yosemite trademark fight Why public financing is critical to parks Needed: Reliable funding for bison management Countering "ecomodernism" The George Wright Forum The GWS Journal of Parks, Protected Areas & Cultural Sites volume 33 number 1 • 2016 Mission The George Wright Society promotes protected area stewardship by bring­ ing practitioners together to share their expertise. Our Goal The Society strives to be the premier organization connecting people, plac­ es, knowledge, and ideas to foster excellence in natural and cultural resource management, research, protection, and interpretation in parks and equivalent reserves. Board of Directors Nathalie Gagnon, President • Ottawa, Ontario Jerry M. Mitchell, Vice President • Littleton, Colorado David J. Parsons, Secretary • Florence, Montana Ryan Sharp, Treasurer • Manhattan, Kansas Zarnaaz Bashir • Ashburn, Virginia David Graber • Three Rivers, California Barrett Kennedy • Baton Rouge, Louisiana Armando Quintero • San Rafael, California Chris Spence • Mill Valley, California Lynn Wilson • Cobble Hill, British Columbia Graduate Student Liaison to the Board Gina Depper • Clemson, South Carolina Executive Office David Harmon, Executive Director/ Co-editor, The George Wright Forum Emily Dekker-Fiala, Conference Coordinator Rebecca Conard, Co-editor, The George Wright Forum P. O. Box 65 • Hancock, Michigan 49930-0065 USA 1-906-487-9722 • [email protected] • www.georgewright.org O 2016 The George Wright Society. All rights reserved (No copyright is claimed for previously published material reprinted herein.) ISSN 0732-4715. Editorial and manuscript submission guidelines may be found at www.georgewright.org/forum. Text paper is made of 50% recycled fi­ bers.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Concept 3: Key Planetary Processes Are Manifested in the Diversity of Lunar Crustal Rocks
    Science Concept 3: Key Planetary Processes are Manifested in the Diversity of Lunar Crustal Rocks Science Concept 3: Key planetary processes are manifested in the diversity of crustal rocks Science Goals: a. Determine the extent and composition of the primary feldspathic crust, KREEP layer, and other products of differentiation. b. Inventory the variety, age, distribution, and origin of lunar rock types. c. Determine the composition of the lower crust and bulk Moon. d. Quantify the local and regional complexity of the current lunar crust. e. Determine the vertical extent and structure of the megaregolith. INTRODUCTION Formation and Evolution of the Moon The Moon is a unique environment, preserving crucial information about the early history and later evolution of the solar system. The lack of major surficial tectonic processes within the past few billion years or so, as well as the lack of significant quantities of surface water, have allowed for excellent preservation of the lithologies and geomorphological features that formed during the major planetary formation events. Fundamental discoveries during the Apollo program showed that the Moon is made up of a variety of volcanic and impact rock types that exhibit a particular range of chemical and mineralogical compositions. The key planetary processes conveyed by this diversity include planetary differentiation, volcanism, and impact cratering. Analysis of Apollo, Luna, and lunar meteoritic samples, as well as orbital data from a series of lunar exploration missions, generated geophysical models that strove to tell the story of the Moon. However, such models are restricted in the sense that they are based on information gathered from the samples that have so far been acquired.
    [Show full text]
  • Astroparticle Physics Claus Grupen
    Astroparticle Physics Claus Grupen Astroparticle Physics With contributions from Glen Cowan, Simon Eidelman, and Tilo Stroh ABC Prof. Dr. Claus Grupen University of Siegen Department of Physics Walter-Flex-Strasse 3 57068 Siegen Germany e-mail: [email protected] With contributions from: Dr. Glen Cowan Dipl. Phys. Tilo Stroh Royal Holloway, University of London University of Siegen Physics Department Department of Physics England Germany e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] Prof. Dr. Simon Eidelman Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk Russia e-mail: [email protected] Library of Congress Control Number: 2005924544 ISBN -10 3-540-25312-2 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York ISBN -13 978-3-540-25312-9 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Violations are liable for prosecution under the German Copyright Law. Springer is a part of Springer Science+Business Media springeronline.com c Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005 Printed in Germany The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • George David Birkhoff (1884-1944): Dutch-American Mathematician Extraordinaire
    George David Birkhoff (1884-1944): Dutch-American Mathematician Extraordinaire Huug van den Dool 4008 Beechwood Rd W-Hyattsville, MD 20782 Presented at the Fourteenth Conference for the Association for the Advancement of Dutch-American Studies (AADAS), Chicago Illinois, June 5-7 2003. Reference: Proceedings of 14th biennial AADAS conference, The Dutch in Urban America, p76-93. Editors R. Swierenga, D. Sinnema, and H. Krabbendam. The Joint Archives of Holland, ISBN 0- 9748422-0-6 Picture of George David Birkhoff in 1913, around the time he published his proof of Poincare s last geometric lemma. 1 Huug van den Dool George David Birkhoff (1884-1944): Dutch-American Mathematician Extraordinaire George David Birkhoff is America s premier mathematician of the first half of the twentieth century. His alma mater, the Illinois Institute of Technology, notes that this mathematical wonder & was said by many to have been the greatest mathematician in the world at the time of his death. 1 Birkhoff is included in every listing of great mathematicians of all times and places, and yet no Dutch American book of notables gives him any mention whatsoever. This paper seeks to redress that oversight by recounting the life and career of this famous second generation Dutch scientist. Birkhoff's Biography Birkhoff hailed from a notable and close-knit immigrant family, many of whom were singularly accomplished in their own ways. Grandfather George Birkhoff, Sr., a carpenter, immigrated in 1869 from Ooltgensplaat, Zuid Holland, to Chicago with his wife and seven children. Here his oldest son, George Jr., became the well-known Dutch consul, and another son David, became a physician.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Mechanics at Meteor Crater, Arizona
    if r IMPACT MECHANICS AT METEOR CRATER, ARIZONA, Eugene M; Shoemake^ Prepared on behalf of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission and published with the permission of the Commission Open file report U. S. Geological Survey OPES FILE REPORT/ This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Geological Survey Standards, or nomenclature. «-»--***»»»«»*-«*--*-* S Geology of tfot*o* C»mto***- *** ».**** .-. - » .-*- § ^Regional »!»§ .- - »«**«>.**-.* » *>* * ** S of lh« «r«t*r*~ 7 «f cT*t«r lnrm«tl»m»««****»****»***»«««M»*«««««* tl IS ; IT'"i : » ....^ 20 -«*sv i '< C«mpr«t alon fey «bock» *-* *- ** »«^-**»*»*- 20 * P«n«tT»ttcm liy Kydrodynmmlc ftow»» ** »****-*-*»^« $S - Di*pe***t ef m«teoTitlc material In th* «k0ek waT« . S? 'Energy, !<«, and velocity o£ naeteorite- --- *--«» 38 Acknowledgment--- --------»------- - ---*- -- - 44 References cited- » * - «.» * * ..» -,.. 45 It ' Wv>;-?;£.:',: . ';;. _ Illustrations * Pago. Figaro 1. Sketch gaologle map of Caayea Diafelo region, Ariaoaa. < § f - 2. Geologic map of aroa avooad Motoor CraUv, Arlaona* / 3. Geologic map of Meteor Crater* Ariaona * § , 4. Cross sections of Metoor Crater, Ariaoaa* aad 5. Compress Urn of rocks at Metaor Crater, Ari»oaa» a« a function of compression of the meteorite and of *,f»».' -*?. ';,;,vl* - 4. Density-pressure corves for iron, rocks* and rock* forming minermlt---------- . * * 27 - 7. Diagrammatic sketches showing sequence of events in formation of Meteor Crater, ArUona--- ~~-~ 43 Tables Table 1. Solutions of equation* 11, 12* and 14 for adopted values of / jm0 - 2,62gtn/cm, ' = 7.85fm/cna - II Impact mechanics at **«**<>* Crater. Ariaona Eugene Bi* Shoemaker U. S. Geot*g*«»* Survey Menio Par** California Meteor Crater U m bowl-shape* depression encompassed by m rim compo.ed cWefly <rf debri* etmeked to 1»1T«»« *£ different c«impo«itieii.
    [Show full text]
  • The Composition of the Lunar Crust: an In-Depth Remote Sensing View
    THE COMPOSITION OF THE LUNAR CRUST: AN IN-DEPTH REMOTE SENSING VIEW A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAIʻI AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS August 2016 By Myriam Lemelin Dissertation Committee: Paul G. Lucey, Chairperson G. Jeffrey Taylor Jeffrey J. Gillis-Davis Peter Englert Karen Meech Keywords: Moon; Remote sensing; Spectroscopy; Lunar crust; Central peak; Basin ring ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Five years ago I was working at the Lunar and Planetary Institute with amazing colleagues such as Carolyn Eve, David Blair, Kirby Runyon, Stephanie Quintana and Sarah Crites. We were discussing our future on our way back home from work, stopping to see the alligators and armadillos on the way, and they asked me what I wanted do next. If I could do anything, what would it be? I wanted to do a PhD in Hawaii with Paul Lucey. I feel very privileged that it happened, as it has been such a marking moment in my life, both from a science and a personnel perspective. I want to thank many people who contributed in making this experience incredible. I want to thank my advisor, Paul Lucey, for his endless creative ideas, his impressive knowledge and for allowing me to take part in many science meetings and conferences where I learned so much about various aspects of planetary sciences, and where I met numerous space enthusiast scientists. I want to thank my dissertation committee members, Jeff Taylor, Jeff Gillis-Davis, Peter Englert, and Karen Meech for their suggestions and comments.
    [Show full text]