WW2 : Panzer Grenadier: Little Saturn

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

WW2 : Panzer Grenadier: Little Saturn Panzer Grenadier: Little Saturn Little Saturn is a supplement for the Panzer Grenadier series, with 10 scenarios based on the battles of the Italian Eighth Army. Rating: Not Rated Yet Price Price £7.50 Ask a question about this product ManufacturerAVALANCHE PRESS Description In July 1942, Benito Mussolini scaled up the Italian participation on the Eastern Front as a show of Fascist solidarity. Seven new divisions departed for Russia, bringing the total deployed there to 10. By late autumn 1942, the Armata Italiana in Russia (ARMIR, also known as the Italian Eighth Army) was operating on a 250-kilometer front along the Don River, covering the left flank of the German 6th Army between Hungarian and Romanian forces. Heavy snow and severe frost were hampering troop movements, and defenses were minimal. The Soviets launched "Operation Uranus on 19 November 1942, aiming to encircle and isolate the German 6th Army with a double envelopment. To exploit this victory, the Soviet general staff planned a winter campaign of continuous and highly ambitious offensive operations, codenamed "Saturn." When the Germans attempted to relieve the trapped armies at Stalingrad, the Soviets moved up their Saturn timetable (renaming it Little Saturn) and launched a counteroffensive. They encircled the 200,000 soldiers of the Italian 8th Army on the Don. In February 1943, the surviving remnants of the Italian 8th Army were disbanded by Il Duce; a quiet end for the brave men of the ARMIR. Little Saturn is a supplement for the Panzer Grenadier series, with 10 scenarios based on the battles of the Italian Eighth Army. This module is not playable by itself, but requires use of the Battle of the Bulge, Eastern Front and Road to Berlin boxed games and Fronte Russo supplement. No other games or supplements are needed to enjoy all 10 scenarios. 1 / 1 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org).

Copy Link

Recommended publications

African Americans in WWII
RESOURCES IN THE DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER LIBRARY RELATING TO AFRICAN-AMERICANS EXPERIENCES IN WORLD WAR II AURAND, HENRY S.: Commanding General, 6th Service Command, 1942-1944; Commanding Officer, Normandy Base Section, 1944-1945; Commanding General, Services of Supply, China Theater, 1945; Commanding General, 6th Service Command, 1946; Commanding General, U.S. Army, Pacific Theater, 1949-1952: Papers, 1873-1967 Box 11: Diary Sept. 8, 1942 – Oct. 29, 1944. Dates for meetings with Truman Gibson, Jr. on following dates, September 28, 1944, September 5, 1944 (Representatives of Colored Press and T.K. Gibson, Jr), August 21, 1944, July 24, 1944, Col. Potter Campbell to confer re hotel for returned Negro soldiers; July 12 preview of film “The Negro Soldier,” February 21 T.K Gibson and showing of film “The Negro Soldier;” December 10, 1943 T.K. Gibson, Jr. Box 13: Personal Correspondence, 1944 D-H. Letter from Truman, Gibson, Jr. to General Aurand re March 6 showing of film “The Negro Soldier” and mention of visit of Brigadier General B.O. Davis. Box 14: Commanding General’s Staff Conferences (1). Remarks of CG at Staff Conference March 6, 1944, last paragraph contains reference to General Aurand’s favorable impression of film “The Negro Soldier.” Box 14: Remarks of CG at his Staff Conference in the Civic Theater 5/10/1943. General Aurand’s statements to effect that “I and all people must be color blind. We must not in any way differentiate between the pigmented races and the White races.” Box 21: History of Normandy Base Section. Box 21: History of Provost Marshall Section Normandy Base Section, Oct 1, 1944-May 9, 1945.
[Show full text]
Ronald Macarthur Hirst Papers
http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt4f59r673 No online items Register of the Ronald MacArthur Hirst papers Processed by Brad Bauer Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California 94305-6010 Phone: (650) 723-3563 Fax: (650) 725-3445 Email: [email protected] © 2008 Hoover Institution Archives. All rights reserved. Register of the Ronald MacArthur 93044 1 Hirst papers Register of the Ronald MacArthur Hirst papers Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California Processed by: Brad Bauer Date Completed: 2008 Encoded by: Elizabeth Konzak and David Jacobs © 2008 Hoover Institution Archives. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Ronald MacArthur Hirst papers Dates: 1929-2004 Collection number: 93044 Creator: Hirst, Ronald MacArthur, 1923- Collection Size: 102 manuscript boxes, 4 card files, 2 oversize boxes (43.2 linear feet) Repository: Hoover Institution Archives Stanford, California 94305-6010 Abstract: The Ronald MacArthur Hirst papers consist largely of material collected and created by Hirst over the course of several decades of research on topics related to the history of World War II and the Cold War, including the Battle of Stalingrad, the Allied landing at Normandy on D-Day, American aerial operations, and the Berlin Airlift of 1948-1949, among other topics. Included are writings, correspondence, biographical data, notes, copies of government documents, printed matter, maps, and photographs. Physical location: Hoover Institution Archives Languages: Languages represented in the collection: English, German Access Collection is open for research. The Hoover Institution Archives only allows access to copiesof audiovisual items. To listen to sound recordings or to view videos or films during your visit, please contact the Archives at least two working days before your arrival.
[Show full text]
Of 22 Pages B
Great Patriotic War Geographic Index © 2020 Landis L. McGauhey Fresno California USA ISBN 978-0-578-71514-8 A. Brest, Belarus, Central Jump-Off Point of Invasion and its Distance From Other Vital Points Brest, Belarus bridge, River Bug 52.093566N,23.685708E 330km SW Minsk 640km SW Smolensk 1,000km SW Moscow 1,000km SW Peter/Lenin 515km NW Kyiv 800km NW Odesa 1,500km NW Volga/Stalin 915km NW Prokhorovka 2,000km NW Tbilisi ____ Page 1 of 22 pages B. Vital Points and Coordinates Point Coordinates Arad, Romania 46.180379N,21.322260E Batum, today Batumi, Georgia 41.638611N,41.637222E Beketonskaya, today Beketovskaya 48.599998N,44.482269E Belgorod, Russia 50.6000000N,36.6000000E Berdichev, today Berdychiv, Ukraine 49.907903N,28.587935E Beryozovka, Ukraine 50.907179N,36.209517E Breslau, today Wrocław, Poland 51.107943N, 17.033127E Bryansk Russia 53.278353N, 34.453125E Bunzlau, Poland, today Bolesławiec: 51.274788N,15.562836E Axis with Liegnitz, 475km on a SSW – NNE axis Bydgoszcz, Poland 53.120649N,18.007514E Courland 57.327559N, 21.576392E today, primarily, Kurzeme or Kurland Latvia, Danzig, Germany, today Gdansk, Poland 54.399259N,18.595052E Debaltsevo, today Debaltseve, Ukraine 48.339268N,38.407951E Dnepropetrovsk, today, Dnipro, Ukraine 48.477203N,34.987545E Dubno Ukraine 50.398781N,25.759649E Dubrovno, or Dubroŭna, Belarus 54.572195N,30.690142E Dvinsk, or Daugavpils Latvia 55.88494N,26.569748E Eberswalde, Germany 52.829530N,13.828135E Elista, Russia 46.316584N,44.27490E Ermolino, Russia 54.140719N,32.868347E Feodosiya, today, Feodosiyskiy
[Show full text]
Thinking Beyond Dead Germans by Capt Zachary Schwartz
IDEAS & ISSUES (STRATEGY & POLICY) Thinking Beyond Dead Germans Bias and our warped orientation on the Russian adversary by Capt Zachary Schwartz ecent articles in the Marine Corps Gazette have shed re- >Capt Schwartz is the Weapons Company Commander, 3/7 Mar. He is also a regu- newed light on the influence lar contributor to and co-founder of the Connecting File, an online newsletter for of German Military history, infantry company commanders. Rparticularly the German military of World War II, on the Marine Corps and the Maneuver Warfare Movement. mistakes made by the authors, omit- pragmatically propped up and pro- This influence is undeniable and has ted information that would have been moted the narrative of the nobility and been critical to the development of our embarrassing and placed the blame strength of German arms against the warfighting doctrine; however, a series for fiascos on third parties.”2 You can Communist threat.5 American military of biases are inherent in our embrace of probably go to your unit library right leaders began to accept and study the the German military experience. These now and find well-worn editions of Gen often-slanted accounts of SS and Heer biases deeply effect our understanding Heinz Guderian’s Panzer Leader, Gen officers. This uncomfortable acceptance of World War II Germany’s most hated Friedrich von Mellenthin Panzer Battles, of Nazi commanders continues to this adversary: Russia. To fully understand and the achingly titled Lost Victories day. In 2019, the Department of De- and execute maneuver warfare, we must by Field Marshal Erich Von Manstein.
[Show full text]
Prussian Apocalypse: the Fall of Danzig 1945 Free Ebook
FREEPRUSSIAN APOCALYPSE: THE FALL OF DANZIG 1945 EBOOK Egbert Kieser,Tony Le Tissier | 256 pages | 19 Jul 2012 | Pen & Sword Books Ltd | 9781848846746 | English | South Yorkshire, United Kingdom Prussian Apocalypse: The Fall of Danzig, - Egbert Kieser - Google книги Harrowing collection of first-hand accounts of the conquest of Prussia and Danzig by Russian forces in the winter and spring ofas related largely by civilians though the boundary between Prussian Apocalypse : The Fall of Danzig, Egbert Kieser. Egbert Kiesers graphic account of the Red Armys assault on East Prussia in is one of the classic histories of the destruction of Hitlers Germany, and it has never before been available in English. Using extensive, firsthand, unforgettable eyewitness testimony, he documents in riveting detail the catastrophe that overtook German civilians and soldiers as they fled from the Soviet onslaught and their world collapsed around them. Tony Le Tissier, in this fluent and vivid translation of the original German text, brings to bear all his expert knowledge of the military defeat of the German armies in the East and the enormity of the human disaster that went Prussian Apocalypse: The Fall of Danzig 1945 it. Egbert Kieser was born in in Bad Salzungen, Thringen and studied philosophy and the history of art at Heidelberg University. He worked as a freelance journalist, writer and editor. The Eastern Front. Precipitate Flight. The Last Trains. The Fall of Elbing. The German 4th Armys Breakout. Over the Ice of the Frisches Haff. The Sinking of the Wilhelm Gustloff. The Sinking of the General von Steuben. Westwards over the Vistula.
[Show full text]
Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc
Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc. 7407 La Jolla Boulevard www.raremaps.com (858) 551-8500 La Jolla, CA 92037 [email protected] ОКРУЖЕНИЕ НЕМЕЦКО-ФАШИСТСКИХ ВОЙСК ПОД СТАЛИНГРАДОМ [Encirclement of the German-Fascist Troops at Stalingrad.] Stock#: 52933 Map Maker: Higher Party School under the CPSU (b) Date: 1950 circa Place: Moscow Color: Color Condition: VG+ Size: 26 x 19 inches Price: SOLD Description: Soviet Historical Broadside Celebrating the Defense of Stalingrad and Capture of the German 6th Army -- One of the Greatest Military Victories in History. The illustration at the top shows Josef Stalin, Vyacheslav Molotov, Kliment Voroshilov, Aleksandr Shcherbakov, Aleksandr Vasilevsky, and Konstantin Rokossovsky plotting Operation Uranus -- drawing out on a map the encirclement of the German 6th Army. The caption explains that the six men are planning the encirclement of "[Friedrich] Paulus's army in the vicinity of Stalingrad." The map at the bottom illustrates the troop movements of Operation Uranus, which ended the Siege of Stalingrad and resulted in the capture of the German 6th Army along with some 400,000 enemy soldiers. Drawer Ref: Russia Stock#: 52933 Page 1 of 2 Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc. 7407 La Jolla Boulevard www.raremaps.com (858) 551-8500 La Jolla, CA 92037 [email protected] ОКРУЖЕНИЕ НЕМЕЦКО-ФАШИСТСКИХ ВОЙСК ПОД СТАЛИНГРАДОМ [Encirclement of the German-Fascist Troops at Stalingrad.] According to the captions, it illustrates "The counter-offensive of the Soviet army and the encirclement of the German fascist troops (November 19-30, 1942)" and "Liquidation of the enemy's attempts to liberate the encircled grouping (December 1942)".
[Show full text]
Hungarian Infantry Forces in 1944
By Wayne Turner UPDATED ON 17 JUNE 2013 1 Hungarian Infantry Forces in 1944 After their experience on the Don River in the winter of to provide the two Hungarian Mountain Brigades and new 1942/43 the Hungarians instituted a number of changes to Border Guard units were raised to replace them. The Border their infantry forces in 1943. The first of these reforms was Guard came under the Army and also patrolled the borders known as the Szabolcs I plan and was updated in early 1944 in peacetime, but they also provided fortress companies for to the Szabolcs II plan. The new infantry divisions were based the guarding of strategic passes and fought if Hungary was around three 3-battalion infantry regiments (the forces on the invaded. Don were two regiment light divisions). They were upgraded The Székler Command has it roots in the traditions of the with heavier artillery, replacing the old 80mm field guns with Austro-Hungarian empire, which had a tradition of keeping 100mm howitzers and reinforced by 149mm howitzers. An irregular light border troops to harass any invading enemy effort was made to obtain heavier anti-tank weapons such (usually the Ottoman Turks). The Székely are the ethnic as the 75mm PaK40 from the Germans and each infantry Hungarian people of Transylvania. During World War II their regiment was issued with nine of these. Another lesson learned responsibility was the Székel Corner, the part of Hungary from the Germans was the need for the infantry to have their known as Northern Transylvania that jutted out over the own armour and the Assault Artillery was formed with the Romanian controlled territory of the rest of Transylvania.
[Show full text]
How Did the Red Army of the Soviet Union So Fiercely and Victoriously
The Story behind the Battle: How did the Red Army of the Soviet Union so fiercely and victoriously defend Stalingrad in 1942-43 despite the lack of trained officers, equipment, preparation, and morale in 1941? Carol Ann Taylor Student No. 30620882 Thesis for Honours Degree of Bachelor of Arts in History School of Social Sciences and Humanities Murdoch University 2012 This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Bachelor of Arts in History with Honours at Murdoch University, 2 November 2012 I declare that this thesis is a true account of my own work, unless indicated Signed: Carol Ann Taylor Date: 2 November 2012 Copyright Acknowledgement Form I acknowledge that a copy of this thesis will be held at Murdoch University Library. I understand that, under the provisions s51.2 of the Copyright Act 1968, all or part of this thesis may be copied without infringement of copyright where such a reproduction is for the purpose of study, and research. This statement does not signal any transfer of copyright away from the author. Signed: ................................................................................................ Full Name of Degree: Bachelor of Arts with Honours in History Thesis Title: The Story behind the Battle: How did the Red Army of the Soviet Union so fiercely and victoriously defend Stalingrad in 1942-43 despite the lack of trained officers, equipment, preparation, and morale in 1941? Author: Carol Ann Taylor Year: 2002 Abstract The victory over Axis forces by the Red Army during the Battle of Stalingrad in 1942-1943 is considered one of the major turning points of World War Two.
[Show full text]
The Adagio of Bruckner's 7Th: the Beginning of the End for the Nazis by Gilles Houle
The Adagio of Bruckner's 7th: The beginning of the end for the Nazis By Gilles Houle « No enemy plane will fly over the “ Reich ” territory. » (Hermann Göring) January 30 was the anniversary of the Nazi regime taking power. It was always a cause for celebration in the Nazi Party, usually with the « Führer » addressing a mass-rally of the Party faithful. The 10th anniversary, falling in 1943, should have been a particularly special event. It very nearly had been the opportunity to show that the Party was at the height of its powers, with German forces occupying virtually the whole of Europe. But the tide of War had turned - even though it would not be clearly seen as a definite reversal for some time. The change in fortunes was almost imperceptible to most Germans at the time, the Nazi regime would only admit to temporary setbacks. Yet, the looming defeat at Stalingrad was very difficult to present as just a « temporary » setback. On Saturday, 30 January 1943, « Reichmarshall » Hermann Göring entered the Air Ministry Building (« Reichsluftfahrtministerium ») on « Willhelm-Straße » with the intention of broadcasting an important speech from the « Ehrensaal » to commemorate the 10th anniversary of the Nazi Party « seizure of power » (« Machtergreifung ») and pay tribute to its leader, Adolf Hitler. Göring was to refer to the current situation in Stalingrad but without incriminating the « Führer » and his decade of rule. Entitled, « Appell an die Wehrmacht » , he was to speak to selected representatives of the « Wehrmacht » . In an attempt to downplay the catastrophic situation and the great losses already suffered there, he decided to turn to mythical elements as a means of propaganda - including an example to the Nibelung battle at Attila’s hall in an attempt to energize the « Wehrmacht » and the German people.
[Show full text]
WWII Operation Uranus
WWII Operation Uranus How the Soviets Trapped the German 6th Army in Stalingrad In the fall of 1942, the Red Army had its back to the wall once again. During the first six months of the 1941 German invasion of the Soviet Union, the Wehrmacht had killed or captured almost three million Russian soldiers. December brought the Soviet Winter Offensive, which sent the German Army reeling back at the cost of another million Russian dead. Hitler Takes Aim at the Oilfields in the Caucasus Overextended Soviet supply lines, coupled with the onset of the spring thaw, brought the offensive to a halt, allowing both sides to regroup. As replacements and reinforcements rushed to the front, Adolf Hitler began planning a new offensive that he hoped would economically strangle his communist enemy. Codenamed “Blau” (Blue), the offensive was aimed at seizing the oilfields in the northern Caucasus and establishing a defensive line running along the Don River from Stalingrad to Voronezh. The move would deprive the Russians of valuable oil and, at the same time, provide that much needed commodity to the German armed forces. It was an ambitious plan—one that would stretch German armies in southern Russian to their limit. To bolster the German attack forces, Hitler called upon his Italian and Romanian allies to supply 1 divisions for the offensive. In response, Mussolini ordered his 8th Italian Army to participate while Romanian dictator Ion Antonescu offered the 3rd and 4th Romanian Armies. Hungary and Slovakia also contributed to the cause. The Soviets’ Disastrous Results Stalin had ambitious plans of his own.
[Show full text]
Deadly Battle of WWII
OPERATION URANUS 0. OPERATION URANUS - Story Preface 1. STALINGRAD 2. SOVIET RESISTANCE 3. THE SIEGE OF STALINGRAD 4. VASILY ZAITSEV 5. TANIA CHERNOVA 6. STALINGRAD SNIPERS 7. THE DUEL 8. IS IT TRUE? 9. OPERATION URANUS 10. HITLER FORBIDS SURRENDER 11. GERMAN SURRENDER 12. THE SWORD OF STALINGRAD This image depicts a photo from the Ukrainian Central State Archive. It shows Soviet troops advancing at Kalac during November of 1942. This action was part of the effort to push the German army out of the Soviet Union. The photo was taken by an unnamed Soviet photojournalist. Thinking his conquest of Stalingrad was assured—or—perhaps pondering what to do if the Sixth Army failed him, Hitler spent the first part of November (1942) at Berghof, his now-destroyed home on the Obersalzberg Mountain. (Nearby Eagle's Nest, Eva Braun's favorite spot, is still a popular Berchtesgaden tourist destination.) The serenity of the mountain location, however, would provide little solace for the Nazi leader in the months to come. While Hitler rested amidst the stunning beauty of Bavaria, Stalin listened to his commanders finalize their brilliant plan ("Operation Uranus") to take back Stalingrad. For seven centuries, Russia had succesfully defended herself against invaders—why should this time be different? Initially unsure the Red Army could effectively mount a surprise counter offensive, Stalin was ultimately persuaded by Marshal Zhukov. The plan could work, but only a few men would know about it. Even field commanders were kept in the dark. Plans to launch the attack on November 9 were changed to November 19th, due to weather.
[Show full text]
The Battle of Stalingrad
The Battle of Stalingrad: The Turning Point on the Eastern Front in WWII F. Courtney Lockwood Senior Thesis 1 Contents List of Maps 3 Introduction: Setting The Stage 5 The Battle Part 1: September-November 1942 13 The Battle Part 2: November 1942-late January 1943 21 Surrender and the March into Captivity 42 National Myth: Propaganda, Vergeltung, Total War 50 The Shockwave of Stalingrad: Psychological Shift, German Morale, Shortcomings of German High Command 60 Conclusion: Russian Agency and the Legacy of Stalingrad 74 2 List of Maps German Invasion of Soviet Union 1941-1942 4 Operation Blau 9 German Advance on Stalingrad, Autumn 1942 14 Operation Uranus 21 Manstein’s Breakout Attempt/Operation Winter Storm 31 Operation Ring 38 3 ‘German Invasion of Soviet Union 1941-1942’ Source: after map in Showalter, D. (2009) Hitler’s Panzers, p. 2 4 Introduction: Setting the Stage The rise and fall of the Third Reich continues to fascinate and confuse historians today. In particular the war against Russia not only was a monumental undertaking for the Nazi State in terms of economic and military resources, but also the invasion included an inherent all or nothing attitude for the future of National Socialism. Russia tempted Germany with land, natural resources, and possibly an end to Bolshevism and Judaism. Southern Russia looked particularly ripe for Hitler as he focused on gaining control of the lucrative grain and oilfields in the Caucuses. A total victory in Russia also spelled out the demise of the Jews and Communists, as Hitler believed Judaism and Bolshevism were intertwined and the extermination of both would allow the Aryan race and ethnic Germans to assert their supremacy.
[Show full text]