DOCSLIB.ORG

From CK Glantz Vol III Book 2 +Index.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

© University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. Contents List of Maps, Tables, and Illustrations ix Preface xv Selected Abbreviations xxi Part I. Defeating German Relief Attempts, 1–19 December 1942 1. Competing German and Soviet Dilemmas 3 Context 3 Hitler, Manstein, and Paulus 4 The Stavka, Vasilevsky, and Vatutin 20 2. The Southwestern Front’s Battles along the Krivia and Chir Rivers, 1–15 December 39 Context: German Relief Plans 39 Soviet Plans and Preliminary Operations, 1–6 December 40 The Chir (Tormosin) Offensive, 7–15 December 46 3. The Stalingrad Front’s Defense against Operation Wintergewitter (Winter Tempest), 1–19 December 86 The Kotel’nikovo Axis and Preparations for Wintergewitter, 1–12 December 86 Operation Wintergewitter and the Battle for Verkhne-Kumskii, 12–19 December 107 4. The Don and Stalingrad Fronts’ Battle for the Stalingrad Pocket, 1–15 December 159 The Offensive, 1–5 December 159 Preparing the Way for 2nd Guards Army, 6–15 December 185 Conclusions 206 Part II. The Expanding Soviet Offensive, 16–31 December 1942 5. Operation Little Saturn and the Tormosin Offensive, 16–31 December 223 Context 223 Operation Little Saturn, 16–31 December 227 5th Tank, 5th Shock, and 2nd Guards Armies’ Tormosin Offensive, 16–31 December 245 © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. viii Contents 6. The End of Wintergewitter and Donnerschlag (Thunder Clap) and the Stalingrad Front’s Kotel’nikovo Offensive, 16–31 December 1943 286 Wintergewitter and Donnerschlag, 16–23 December 286 The Climax of Wintergewitter, 19–24 December 297 The Stalingrad Front’s Kotel’nikovo Offensive, 24–27 December 317 The Consequences of German Defeat 327 7. The Stalingrad Pocket, 16–31 December 333 Sixth Army’s Situation on 16 December 333 Combat Operations, 16–23 December 342 After Donnerschlag, 24–31 December 351 Conclusions 376 Part III. Operation Ring: The Destruction of Sixth Army, 1 January–2 February 1943 8. Sixth Army’s Situation, Preliminaries, and the Don Front’s Plan, 1–9 January 395 The Expanding Soviet Offensive 395 Sixth Army’s Situation 398 Preliminary Operations 407 Preparing Operation Ring [Kol’tso] 419 9. Destruction: The First Stage, 10–17 January 433 The Ultimatum 433 The Soviet Advance to the Rossoshka River, 10–14 January 435 From the Rossoshka River to Pitomnik, 15–17 January 481 10. Destruction: The Second Stage, 18–25 January 495 The Lull, 18–21 January 495 The Soviet Advance, 22–25 January 510 11. Destruction: The Finale, 26 January–2 February 529 Rokossovsky’s Plan 529 The Soviet Advance and Liquidation of Sixth Army’s Southern Pocket, 26–30 January 530 Paulus’s Surrender and the Soviet Liquidation of Sixth Army’s Northern Pocket, 31 January–2 February 559 The Aftermath 571 Conclusions 578 12. Context, Conclusions, and Summary Judgments 585 Notes 609 Selected Bibliography 679 Index 699 © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. Maps,Tables, and Illustrations MAPS 1. Army Group Don’s plan Wintergewitter [Winter Tempest], 1 December 1942 12 2. 5th Tank Army’s battle along the Chir River: situation, 2 December 1942 43 3. Situation along the Chir River, 6 December 1942 45 4. Situation along the Chir River, 7 December 1942 50 5. Situation along the Chir River, 8 December 1942 57 6. Situation along the Chir River, 9 December 1942 61 7. Situation along the Chir River, 11 December 1942 66 8. Situation along the Chir River, 13 December 1942 72 9. Situation along the Chir River, 15 December 1942 82 10. Fourth Panzer Army’s situation at 2200 hours, 10 December 1942 99 11. Kotel’nikovo axis: situation at 2200 hours, 11 December 1942 105 12. Stalingrad Front’s Kotel’nikovo defense, 12–23 December 1942 108 13. Kotel’nikovo axis: situation at 2200 hours, 12 December 1942 109 14. Kotel’nikovo axis: situation at 2200 hours, 13 December 1942 116 15. Kotel’nikovo axis: situation at 2200 hours, 14 December 1942 122 16. Kotel’nikovo axis: situation at 2200 hours, 15 December 1942 126 17. 4th Mechanized Corps’ fight for Verkhne-Kumskii, 14–15 December 1942 127 18. Kotel’nikovo axis: situation at 2200 hours, 16 December 1942 132 19. 4th Mechanized Corps’ fight for Verkhne-Kumskii, 16–17 December 1942 133 20. Kotel’nikovo axis: situation at 2200 hours, 17 December 1942 138 21. 1378th Rifle Regiment’s defense at Verkhne-Kumskii, 16–18 December 1942 139 22. Kotel’nikovo axis: situation at 2200 hours, 18 December 1942 144 23. Kotel’nikovo axis: situation at 2200 hours, 19 December 1942 149 24. 3rd Guards (4th) Mechanized Corps’ withdrawal to the Myshkova River, 19 December 1942 150 25. Stalingrad pocket, 1 December 1942 162 26. Sixth Army’s Western Front, 1 December 1942 163 27. Stalingrad pocket’s Western Front, 4–5 December 1942 171 28. Stalingrad pocket’s Western Front, 6–7 December 1942 186 29. Stalingrad pocket, 8–10 December 1942 191 © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. x Illustrations 30. Stalingrad pocket’s Western Front, 7–10 December 1942 193 31. Stalingrad pocket’s Western Front, 11–14 December 1942 203 32. Operation Little Saturn: opposing force, 16 December 1942 229 33. Operational plan for Little Saturn 231 34. Soviet Little Saturn and Kotel’nikovo offensives, 16–31 December 1942 234 35. Situation along the Chir River, 16 December 1942 246 36. Situation along the Chir River, 18 December 1942 249 37. Situation along the Chir River, 19–20 December 1942 251 38. Situation along the Chir River, 22–24 December 1942 257 39. Plan for the Tormosin offensive: situation on 23–24 December 1942 260 40. 5th Tank Army’s advance on Chernyshkovskii: situation on 25–26 December 1942 263 41. 5th Tank Army’s advance: situation on 27 December 1942 266 42. 5th Tank Army’s advance: situation on 28 December 1942 268 43. 5th Tank Army’s advance: situation on 29 December 1942 269 44. 5th Tank Army’s advance: situation on 30–31 December 1942 270 45. Tormosin offensive: situation on 29 December 1942 274 46. Tormosin offensive: situation on 30 December 1942 278 47. Tormosin offensive: situation on 31 December 1942 282 48. Donnerschlag (Thunderclap): Sixth Army’s breakout plan, 17 December 1942 288 49. Wintergewitter and Donnerschlag, 19–23 December 1942 289 50. Kotel’nikovo axis: situation at 2200 hours, 20 December 1942 299 51. Kotel’nikovo axis: situation at 2200 hours, 21 December 1942 303 52. LVII Panzer Corps’ advance, 22 December 1942 310 53. Kotel’nikovo axis: situation at 2200 hours, 23 December 1942 312 54. Kotel’nikovo offensive: Stalingrad Front’s plan 319 55. Kotel’nikovo axis: situation on 24 and 25 December 1942 322 56. Kotel’nikovo axis: situation on 26 and 27 December 1942 325 57. Kotel’nikovo axis: situation at 2200 hours, 29 December 1942 328 58. Kotel’nikovo axis: situation at 2200 hours, 30 December 1942 329 59. Stalingrad pocket, 20 December 1942 345 60. Sixth Army’s revised plan for Donnerschlag (Thunderclap), 26 December 1942 362 61. Initial plan for Operation Kol’tso (Ring), 27 December 1942 373 62. Final plan for the first stage of Operation Kol’tso (Ring), with Stavka corrections 375 63. Stavka’s offensive plans, 13 December 1942–20 January 1943 396 64. Stavka’s offensive plans, 20–26 January 1943 397 65. Stalingrad pocket’s Western Front, 2 January 1943 402 © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. Illustrations xi 66. Stalingrad pocket’s Western Front, 5 January 1943 410 67. Stalingrad pocket’s Western Front, 6 January 1943 412 68. Stalingrad pocket’s Western Front, 8 January 1943 414 69. Don Front’s Operation Kol’tso (Ring), 10 January–2 February 1943 420 70. Opposing forces in the Stalingrad region, 10 January 1943 430 71. Operation Ring, 10–13 January 1943 436 72. 62nd Army’s attack plan, 9 January 1943 445 73. Operation Ring, 13–17 January 1943 478 74. Operation Ring, 17–25 January 1943 499 75. Operation Ring, 25–31 January 1943 533 76. 284th Rifle Division’s positions, 26–28 January 1943 535 77. Destruction of Sixth Army’s Southern Pocket, 28–31 January 1943 544 78. Destruction of Sixth Army’s Northern Pocket, 28 January– 2 February 1943 545 TABLES 1. Assembly and concentration of forces designated to participate in Operation Wintergewitter 41 2. Combat strength of selected 62nd Army formations fighting in Stalingrad city, 1–3 December 1942 168 3. Dispositions of the Stalingrad Front’s 2nd Guards and 51st Armies at dawn on 22 December 1942 (from right to left or west to east) 307 4. Combat rating and mobility of infantry, panzer-grenadier, and pioneer battalions subordinate to Sixth Army’s divisions, 16 November and 15 December 1942 335 5. Comparison of the combat strength of Sixth Army’s combat battalions (grenadier [infantry], panzer-grenadier, and pioneer), 16 November and 15 December 1942 338 6. Approximate locations of opposing forces in and around Sixth Army’s Stalingrad pocket, 16 December 1942 340 7. Combat rating and mobility of infantry, panzer-grenadier, and pioneer battalions subordinate to Sixth Army’s divisions, 15 and 21 December 1942 352 8. Comparison of the combat strength of Sixth Army’s combat battalions (grenadier [infantry], panzer-grenadier, and pioneer), 15 and 21 December 1942 354 9. Combat rating and mobility of infantry, panzer-grenadier, and pioneer battalions subordinate to Sixth Army’s divisions, 21 and 28 December 1942 367 10.
Recommended publications
  • African Americans in WWII

    African Americans in WWII

    RESOURCES IN THE DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER LIBRARY RELATING TO AFRICAN-AMERICANS EXPERIENCES IN WORLD WAR II AURAND, HENRY S.: Commanding General, 6th Service Command, 1942-1944; Commanding Officer, Normandy Base Section, 1944-1945; Commanding General, Services of Supply, China Theater, 1945; Commanding General, 6th Service Command, 1946; Commanding General, U.S. Army, Pacific Theater, 1949-1952: Papers, 1873-1967 Box 11: Diary Sept. 8, 1942 – Oct. 29, 1944. Dates for meetings with Truman Gibson, Jr. on following dates, September 28, 1944, September 5, 1944 (Representatives of Colored Press and T.K. Gibson, Jr), August 21, 1944, July 24, 1944, Col. Potter Campbell to confer re hotel for returned Negro soldiers; July 12 preview of film “The Negro Soldier,” February 21 T.K Gibson and showing of film “The Negro Soldier;” December 10, 1943 T.K. Gibson, Jr. Box 13: Personal Correspondence, 1944 D-H. Letter from Truman, Gibson, Jr. to General Aurand re March 6 showing of film “The Negro Soldier” and mention of visit of Brigadier General B.O. Davis. Box 14: Commanding General’s Staff Conferences (1). Remarks of CG at Staff Conference March 6, 1944, last paragraph contains reference to General Aurand’s favorable impression of film “The Negro Soldier.” Box 14: Remarks of CG at his Staff Conference in the Civic Theater 5/10/1943. General Aurand’s statements to effect that “I and all people must be color blind. We must not in any way differentiate between the pigmented races and the White races.” Box 21: History of Normandy Base Section. Box 21: History of Provost Marshall Section Normandy Base Section, Oct 1, 1944-May 9, 1945.
  • East German TO&Es 1980-1989 V1.3

    East German TO&Es 1980-1989 V1.3

    East German TO&Es 1980-1989 v1.3 BATTLEGROUP CWEG-01 (a) The East German Army (NVA) had x2 Panzer Divisions (7th & Panzer Division 1980s (a) 9th) and x4 Panzer-Grenadier Divisions (1st, 4th, 8th & 11th). These were grouped into two higher administrative formations – the BATTLEGROUPS 3rd and 5th Military Districts. Each Military District had x1 Panzer Division and x2 Panzer-Grenadier Divisions, plus Army Support BG CWEG-03 Assets. Some sources record these formations as ‘Armies’, but in x3 Panzer Regiment reality the Military Districts were administrative formations only. In war the six East German divisions would have come under the BG CWEG-04 command of five of the six Soviet Armies in Germany (28th, 2nd Guards, 8th Guards, 20th Guards & 3rd Shock Armies, but not 1st x1 Panzer-Grenadier Regiment (Tracked) Guards Army), while the East German Army support assets would form the Army Troops of 2nd Guards Army and 8th Guards Army. BG CWEG-08 Consequently, East German divisions could have Soviet Army x1 Panzer-Reconnaissance Battalion Troops in support and vice versa. The East Germans were widely regarded as the most reliable of all Warpac armies (the expression ‘There’s none so fanatical as a convert’ springs to mind) and in x1 Pioneer Battalion (b) some cases were regarded as more combat-efficient than many Soviet units in Germany. FIRE SUPPORT ELEMENTS (b) The Divisional Pioneer Battalion had a single Pioneer Company that could be considered an ME for game purposes (ME CWEG- FSE CWEG-05 14), while the rest of the battalion consisted of road-building, Divisional Artillery Regiment bridging, amphibian, position preparation and demolition equipment, which is unlikely to feature very heavily in a game.
  • Analytical Tools for Economic Research of Small Municipalities and Gaming Techniques for Community Involvement (The Case of Voronezh Region in Russia) M.I

    Analytical Tools for Economic Research of Small Municipalities and Gaming Techniques for Community Involvement (The Case of Voronezh Region in Russia) M.I

    R-ECONOMY, 2020, 6(2), 111–124 doi: 10.15826/recon.2020.6.2.010 Original Paper doi 10.15826/recon.2020.6.2.010 Analytical tools for economic research of small municipalities and gaming techniques for community involvement (the case of Voronezh region in Russia) M.I. Solosina1 , I.N. Shchepina1, 2 1 Voronezh State University, Voronezh, Russia; e-mail: [email protected] 2 CEMIRAS, Moscow, Russia ABSTRACT KEYWORDS Relevance. The article deals with the issues of strategic territorial development in Russian regions and municipalities and the analytical tools for studying them. analytical tools, gaming While there is a diversity of tools for studying large municipalities, the choice of techniques, strategic territorial tools for smaller urban and rural settlements is quite limited. This is the research development, municipality, gap this study seeks to address. Research objective. This study focuses on the systemic approach case of municipal districts and settlements in Voronezh region. The aim is to show how the proposed methodology can be applied for such cases. Data and methods. The study relies on the methods of systemic analysis and synthesis, comparison and generalization, multidimensional statistics as well as on the use of gaming techniques. The data for the analysis were obtained from federal, re- gional and municipal statistics; municipal information systems of settlements of Voronezh region; municipal information system MISS ‘Volost’; and from the executive authorities of Voronezh region. Results. The analysis of the set of in- dicators, including the municipal product to GRP, for the period between 2006 FOR CITATION and 2015 has shown that the town of Liski is one of the leading municipalities in Voronezh district (the municipal product of Liskinsky accounts for over 5% of Solosina, M.I., Shchepina, I.N.
  • World War II-Related Exhibitions at the National Gallery of Art

    World War II-Related Exhibitions at the National Gallery of Art

    National Gallery of Art: Research Resources Relating to World War II World War II-Related Exhibitions at the National Gallery of Art During the war years, the National Gallery of Art presented a series of exhibitions explicitly related to the war or presenting works of art for which the museum held custody during the hostilities. Descriptions of each of the exhibitions is available in the list of past exhibitions at the National Gallery of Art. Catalogs, brochures, press releases, news reports, and photographs also may be available for examination in the Gallery Archives for some of the exhibitions. The Great Fire of London, 1940 18 December 1941-28 January 1942 American Artists’ Record of War and Defense 7 February-8 March 1942 French Government Loan 2 March 1942-1945, periodically Soldiers of Production 17 March-15 April 1942 Three Triptychs by Contemporary Artists 8-15 April 1942 Paintings, Posters, Watercolors, and Prints, Showing the Activities of the American Red Cross 2-30 May 1942 Art Exhibition by Men of the Armed Forces 5 July-2 August 1942 War Posters 17 January-18 February 1943 Belgian Government Loan 7 February 1943-January 1946 War Art 20 June-1 August 1943 Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Drawings and Watercolors from French Museums and Private Collections 8 August-5 September 1943 (second showing) Art for Bonds 12 September-10 October 1943 1DWLRQDO*DOOHU\RI$UW:DVKLQJWRQ'&*DOOHU\$UFKLYHV ::,,5HODWHG([KLELWLRQVDW1*$ Marine Watercolors and Drawings 12 September-10 October 1943 Paintings of Naval Aviation by American Artists
  • Reflections on Pearl Harbor Anniversaries Past Roger Dingman University of Southern California

    Reflections on Pearl Harbor Anniversaries Past Roger Dingman University of Southern California

    Reflections on Pearl Harbor Anniversaries Past Roger Dingman University of Southern California By any measure, the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was one of the decisive events of the twentieth century. For Americans, it was the greatest military disaster in memory-one which set them on the road to becoming the world's greatest military power. For Japanese, the attack was a momentary triumph that marked the beginning of their nation's painful and protracted transition from empire to economic colossus. Thus it is entirely appropriate, more than fifty years after the Pearl Harbor attack, to pause and consider the meaning of that event. One useful way of doing so is to look back on Pearl Harbor anniversaries past. For in public life, no less than in private, anniversaries can tell us where we are; prompt reflections on where we have been; and make us think about where we may be going. Indeed, because they are occa- sions that demand decisions by government officials and media man- agers and prompt responses by ordinary citizens about the relationship between past and present, anniversaries provide valuable insights into the forces that have shaped Japanese-American relations since 1941. On the first Pearl Harbor anniversary in December 1942, Japanese and Americans looked back on the attack in very different ways. In Tokyo, Professor Kamikawa Hikomatsu, one of Japan's most distin- guished historians of international affairs, published a newspaper ar- ticle that defended the attack as a legally and morally justifiable act of self-defense. Surrounded by enemies that exerted unrelenting mili- tary and economic pressure on it, and confronted by an America that refused accommodation through negotiation, Japan had had no choice but to strike.' On Guadalcanal, where they were locked in their first protracted battle against Japanese troops, Americans mounted a "hate shoot" against them to memorialize those who had died at Pearl Har- bor a year earlier.2 In Honolulu, the Advertiser editorial writer urged The ]journal of American-East Asian Relations, Vol.
  • British Responses to the Holocaust

    British Responses to the Holocaust

    Centre for Holocaust Education British responses to the Insert graphic here use this to Holocaust scale /size your chosen image. Delete after using. Resources RESOURCES 1: A3 COLOUR CARDS, SINGLE-SIDED SOURCE A: March 1939 © The Wiener Library Wiener The © AT FIRST SIGHT… Take a couple of minutes to look at the photograph. What can you see? You might want to think about: 1. Where was the photograph taken? Which country? 2. Who are the people in the photograph? What is their relationship to each other? 3. What is happening in the photograph? Try to back-up your ideas with some evidence from the photograph. Think about how you might answer ‘how can you tell?’ every time you make a statement from the image. SOURCE B: September 1939 ‘We and France are today, in fulfilment of our obligations, going to the aid of Poland, who is so bravely resisting this wicked and unprovoked attack on her people.’ © BBC Archives BBC © AT FIRST SIGHT… Take a couple of minutes to look at the photograph and the extract from the document. What can you see? You might want to think about: 1. The person speaking is British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain. What is he saying, and why is he saying it at this time? 2. Does this support the belief that Britain declared war on Germany to save Jews from the Holocaust, or does it suggest other war aims? Try to back-up your ideas with some evidence from the photograph. Think about how you might answer ‘how can you tell?’ every time you make a statement from the sources.
  • Military Tribunal, Indictments

    Military Tribunal, Indictments

    MILITARY TRIBUNALS Case No. 12 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -against- WILHELM' VON LEEB, HUGO SPERRLE, GEORG KARL FRIEDRICH-WILHELM VON KUECHLER, JOHANNES BLASKOWITZ, HERMANN HOTH, HANS REINHARDT. HANS VON SALMUTH, KARL HOL­ LIDT, .OTTO SCHNmWIND,. KARL VON ROQUES, HERMANN REINECKE., WALTERWARLIMONT, OTTO WOEHLER;. and RUDOLF LEHMANN. Defendants OFFICE OF MILITARY GOVERNMENT FOR GERMANY (US) NORNBERG 1947 • PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c6a171/ TABLE OF CONTENTS - Page INTRODUCTORY 1 COUNT ONE-CRIMES AGAINST PEACE 6 A Austria 'and Czechoslovakia 7 B. Poland, France and The United Kingdom 9 C. Denmark and Norway 10 D. Belgium, The Netherland.; and Luxembourg 11 E. Yugoslavia and Greece 14 F. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 17 G. The United states of America 20 . , COUNT TWO-WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: CRIMES AGAINST ENEMY BELLIGERENTS AND PRISONERS OF WAR 21 A: The "Commissar" Order , 22 B. The "Commando" Order . 23 C, Prohibited Labor of Prisoners of Wal 24 D. Murder and III Treatment of Prisoners of War 25 . COUNT THREE-WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: CRIMES AGAINST CIVILIANS 27 A Deportation and Enslavement of Civilians . 29 B. Plunder of Public and Private Property, Wanton Destruc­ tion, and Devastation not Justified by Military Necessity. 31 C. Murder, III Treatment and Persecution 'of Civilian Popu- lations . 32 COUNT FOUR-COMMON PLAN OR CONSPIRACY 39 APPENDIX A-STATEMENT OF MILITARY POSITIONS HELD BY THE DEFENDANTS AND CO-PARTICIPANTS 40 2 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c6a171/ INDICTMENT
  • Erich Von Manstein and the War of Annihilation

    Erich Von Manstein and the War of Annihilation

    Oliver von Wrochem. Erich von Manstein: Vernichtungskrieg und Geschichtspolitik. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh Verlag, 2006. 431 S. EUR 39.90, cloth, ISBN 978-3-506-72977-4. Reviewed by Jeff Rutherford Published on H-German (April, 2008) On May 7, 1953, the Swabian village of All‐ ers. The message was clear: Hitler's "most brilliant mendingen prepared for a festival. The mayor strategist" was ready to enter West German soci‐ had roused the village inhabitants early in the ety. morning, school was cancelled, the town was fes‐ In this timely, impressively researched study, tively decorated and, according to a member of Oliver von Wrochem describes this "idyllic the media who was present, nearly every child Heimat" occasion as "simultaneously a historical/ wore a bouquet of fowers. A brass band provided political signal and a memory/cultural event" (p. musical accompaniment. The few villagers initial‐ 260). Manstein's release symbolized the rehabili‐ ly unaware of the reason for the unusual events tation of the men who had served in Hitler's were quickly informed: Field Marshal Erich von Wehrmacht, though this rehabilitation was pri‐ Manstein, the most celebrated of Hitler's military marily due to the efforts of high-ranking officers commanders and most controversial of the post‐ to produce their own version of the war, a process war military internees, had been released from in which the former Field Marshal was intimately captivity and was coming to the village. When involved. Wrochem also details the complicity of Manstein addressed the crowd, he thanked them western governments, particularly the British, in for their support and exclaimed, "We no longer covering up the unsavory aspects of Nazi Ger‐ want to think about the difficulties of the past, but many's war against the Soviet Union to ensure only of the future" (p.
  • 202 Copyright © 2020 by Academic Publishing House Researcher S.R.O

    202 Copyright © 2020 by Academic Publishing House Researcher S.R.O

    European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2020, 9(1) Copyright © 2020 by Academic Publishing House Researcher s.r.o. All rights reserved. Published in the Slovak Republic European Journal of Contemporary Education E-ISSN 2305-6746 2020, 9(1): 202-211 DOI: 10.13187/ejced.2020.1.202 www.ejournal1.com WARNING! Article copyright. Copying, reproduction, distribution, republication (in whole or in part), or otherwise commercial use of the violation of the author(s) rights will be pursued on the basis of international legislation. Using the hyperlinks to the article is not considered a violation of copyright. The History of Education The Public Education System in Voronezh Governorate in the Period 1703–1917. Part 1 Aleksandr А. Cherkasov a , b , с , *, Sergei N. Bratanovskii d , e, Larisa A. Koroleva f a International Network Center for Fundamental and Applied Research, Washington, USA b Volgograd State University, Volgograd, Russian Federation с American Historical Association, Washington, USA d Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation e Institute of State and Law of RAS, Moscow, Russian Federation f Penza State University of Architecture and Construction, Penza, Russian Federation Abstract This paper examines the public education system in Voronezh Governorate in the period 1703–1917. This part of the collection represents an attempt to reproduce a picture of how the region’s public education system developed between 1703 and 1861. In putting this work together, the authors drew upon a pool of statistical data published in Memorandum Books for Voronezh Governorate, reports by the Minister of Public Education, and Memorandum Books for certain educational institutions (e.g., the Voronezh Male Gymnasium).
  • The Issues of War with Japan Coverage in the Presidential Project «Fundamental Multi-Volume Work» the Great Patriotic War of 1941 - 1945 «»

    The Issues of War with Japan Coverage in the Presidential Project «Fundamental Multi-Volume Work» the Great Patriotic War of 1941 - 1945 «»

    Vyatcheslav Zimonin Captain (Russia NAVY) Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor of Military University, Honored Scientist Of The Russian Federation and Academy of Natural Sciences The issues of war with Japan coverage in the Presidential project «Fundamental multi-volume work» The Great Patriotic War of 1941 - 1945 «» Fundamental multi-volume work «The Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945» is being developed in accordance with the Decree № 240-рп of May 5, 2008 of the President of the Russian Federation. The work is developed under the organizational leadership of the main drafting committee headed by the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation Army General Sergey Shoigu. Major General V.A. Zolotarev, well-known Russian scientist, Doctor of Historical and Legal Sciences, Professor, Academician of the Academy of Natural Sciences, State Councilor of the Russian Federation Deputy Chairman of the GRK is appointed as scientific director of the multi-volume work. Fundamental structure of a multivolume work: Volume 1 - «The main facts of the war,» Volume 2 - «The origin and the beginning of the war» Volume 3 - «Battles and actions that changed the course of the war,» Volume 4 - «Freeing of the USSR, 1944 « Volume 5 - «The final victory. Final operations of World War II in Europe. War with Japan « Volume 6 - «The Secret War. Intelligence and counterintelligence in the Great Patriotic War « Volume 7 - «Economy and weapons of war» Volume 8 - «Foreign policy and diplomacy of the Soviet Union during the war» Volume 9 - «Allies of the USSR in the war» Volume 10 - «The power, society and war» Volume 11 - «Policy and Strategy of Victory.
  • Ronald Macarthur Hirst Papers

    Ronald Macarthur Hirst Papers

    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt4f59r673 No online items Register of the Ronald MacArthur Hirst papers Processed by Brad Bauer Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California 94305-6010 Phone: (650) 723-3563 Fax: (650) 725-3445 Email: [email protected] © 2008 Hoover Institution Archives. All rights reserved. Register of the Ronald MacArthur 93044 1 Hirst papers Register of the Ronald MacArthur Hirst papers Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California Processed by: Brad Bauer Date Completed: 2008 Encoded by: Elizabeth Konzak and David Jacobs © 2008 Hoover Institution Archives. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Ronald MacArthur Hirst papers Dates: 1929-2004 Collection number: 93044 Creator: Hirst, Ronald MacArthur, 1923- Collection Size: 102 manuscript boxes, 4 card files, 2 oversize boxes (43.2 linear feet) Repository: Hoover Institution Archives Stanford, California 94305-6010 Abstract: The Ronald MacArthur Hirst papers consist largely of material collected and created by Hirst over the course of several decades of research on topics related to the history of World War II and the Cold War, including the Battle of Stalingrad, the Allied landing at Normandy on D-Day, American aerial operations, and the Berlin Airlift of 1948-1949, among other topics. Included are writings, correspondence, biographical data, notes, copies of government documents, printed matter, maps, and photographs. Physical location: Hoover Institution Archives Languages: Languages represented in the collection: English, German Access Collection is open for research. The Hoover Institution Archives only allows access to copiesof audiovisual items. To listen to sound recordings or to view videos or films during your visit, please contact the Archives at least two working days before your arrival.
  • River Flotillas in Support of Defensive Ground Operations: the Soviet Experience

    River Flotillas in Support of Defensive Ground Operations: the Soviet Experience

    The Journal of Slavic Military Studies ISSN: 1351-8046 (Print) 1556-3006 (Online) Journal homepage: http://tandfonline.com/loi/fslv20 River Flotillas in Support of Defensive Ground Operations: The Soviet Experience Lester W. Grau To cite this article: Lester W. Grau (2016) River Flotillas in Support of Defensive Ground Operations: The Soviet Experience, The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 29:1, 73-98, DOI: 10.1080/13518046.2016.1129875 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2016.1129875 Published online: 16 Feb 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 51 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=fslv20 Download by: [Combined Arms Research Library] Date: 09 May 2016, At: 10:45 JOURNAL OF SLAVIC MILITARY STUDIES 2016, VOL. 29, NO. 1, 73–98 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2016.1129875 River Flotillas in Support of Defensive Ground Operations: The Soviet Experience Lester W. Grau Foreign Military Studies Oce ABSTRACT In the history of warfare, ground and naval forces frequently have to cooperate. There are usually problems putting these two forces together since their missions, equipment, training, communications and mutual unfamiliarity get in the way. These problems are common during transport of ground force equipment and personnel aboard naval vessels, exacer- bated during amphibious landings and assaults and very di- cult when operating together along major rivers. This article analyzes the Soviet history of defensive river otilla combat during the rst period of the Great Patriotic War (World War II against Germany).